Latent infection with Epstein-Barr virus in odontogenic disorders: comparison among ameloblastoma, dentigerous cyst and odontogenic keratocyst

The Prevalence of EBV and KSHV in Odontogenic Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Odontogenic lesions evolve as a result of altered dental development. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the coinfection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) in radicular cysts, dentigerous cysts, odontogenic keratocysts, and ameloblastomas.

METHODS

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to analyse 66 cases of odontogenic lesions for the presence of EBV-DNA and KSHV-DNA. These lesions were 15 radicular cysts, 16 dentigerous cysts, 18 odontogenic keratocysts, and 17 ameloblastomas.

RESULTS

EBV-DNA was detected in 24 (36.4%) of the studied samples as follows: 6 samples (40.0%) of radicular cysts, 4 (25.0%) of dentigerous cysts, 10 (55.6 %) of odontogenic keratocysts, and 4 (23.5%) of ameloblastomas (P = .168). KSHV-DNA was found in 16 (24.2%) of the studied samples as follows: 1 sample (6.7%) of radicular cysts, 6 (37.5%) of dentigerous cysts, 8 (44.4 %) of odontogenic keratocysts, and 1 (5.9%) of ameloblastomas (P = .001). Additionally, EBV and KSHV were positively correlated in all studied samples (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Both EBV and KSHV are found in odontogenic cysts and ameloblastomas. KSHV and EBV are more prevalent in odontogenic keratocysts than in other studied odontogenic lesions. Further, there is a high prevalence of EBV and KSHV coinfection in odontogenic cysts and ameloblastomas.

The anecdote of viral etiopathogenia in ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst: Why don't we let it go?

BACKGROUND

Ameloblastoma (AM) and odontogenic Keratocyst (OKC) are destructive odontogenic lesions of the gnathion. Although their exact pathogeneses are not yet totally understood, the viral etiopathogenesis in AM and KCOT has been proposed. True to syndromic keratocystic odontogenic tumor (sKCOT) and non-syndromic OKC is the high recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVES

Given that shared pathways trailed by AM and by sKCOT/OKC have been suggested, this study, however, contrasts the expression of AM and OKC for viral antibodies.

METHOD

A total of archival 80 paraffin blocks of cases of parakeratinized odontogenic keratocyst (non-syndromic KCOTs) and of ameloblastomas (n = 40 for each) were included in this study to be sectioned and stained for two immunohistochemical markers: anti-human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein.

RESULTS

All the submitted cases of AM and parakeratinized OKC were negative for both markers: anti-HPV and anti-LMP-1.

CONCLUSIONS

Although results could have been biased, given the same ethnic group and territory examined in this study, all cases were negative for both markers. Therefore, the viral contribution to the etiopathogenesis in AM and OKC could not be established in this study.

Human cytomegalovirus is present in odontogenic cysts

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies suggest that some viruses, including human cytomegalovirus (CMV), may be involved in the pathogenesis of periapical lesions. Since periapical cysts (PCs) represent the next stage in the evolution of periapical granuloma, it seemed reasonable to investigate the presence of CMV in PCs and any possible relationship between its presence and the clinical features of those cysts, as well as to compare the results obtained with corresponding findings in non-inflammatory lesions, like odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs).

METHODS

Samples of 33 PCs and 10 OKCs, obtained at the time of surgery, were used for the detection of CMV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Presence of the virus was correlated with clinical and radiographic features of the cysts.

RESULTS

CMV was detected in 18 PCs (54.5%) and six OKCs (60%). The presence of CMV was more frequent in cyst samples collected from patients who reported previous episodes of acute infection. The presence of sinus tract was more frequent in CMV-positive cysts and CMV presence was less frequent in a group of cysts showing signs of acute inflammation at the time of sample collection. The mean sizes of CMV-positive and CMV-negative PCs were almost the same; CMV-positive OKCs were slightly larger than CMV-negative OKCs. None of these results proved to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The presence of CMV in the cystic wall is a common feature of both inflammatory and non-inflammatory odontogenic cysts. Although this study has not proved that CMV affects pathogenesis of odontogenic cysts, such a possibility could not be ruled out.

Molecular pathology of odontogenic tumors

Odontogenic tumors are lesions derived from the elements of the tooth-forming apparatus and are found exclusively within the jawbones. This review represents a contemporary outline of our current understanding of the molecular and genetic alterations associated with the development and progression of odontogenic tumors, including oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, oncoviruses, growth factors, telomerase, cell cycle regulators, apoptosis-related factors, regulators of tooth development, hard tissue-related proteins, cell adhesion molecules, matrix-degrading proteinases, angiogenic factors, and osteolytic cytokines. It is hoped that better understanding of related molecular mechanisms will help to predict the course of odontogenic tumors and lead to the development of new therapeutic concepts for their management.

Aberrant gene expression in epithelial cells of mixed odontogenic tumors

Comparative investigations of odontogenic cells in normally forming teeth and tumors may provide insights into the mechanisms of the differentiation process. The present study is devoted to late phenotypic markers of ameloblast and odontoblast cells, i.e., proteins involved in biomineralization. The in situ expression of amelogenins, keratins, collagens type III and IV, vimentin, fibronectin, osteonectin, and osteocalcin was performed on normal and tumor odontogenic human cells. The pattern of protein expression showed some similarities between ameloblasts and odontoblasts present in normally developing human teeth and cells present in neoplastic tissues of ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontomas, and complex odontomas. Amelogenins (for ameloblasts) and osteocalcin (for odontoblasts) were detected in cells with well-organized enamel and dentin, respectively. In contrast, "mixed" cells located in epithelial zones of mixed odontogenic tumors co-expressed amelogenins and osteocalcin, as shown by immunostaining. The presence of osteocalcin transcripts was also demonstrated by in situ hybridization in these cells. Keratins and vimentin were detected in the same epithelial zones. Tumor epithelial cells were associated with various amounts of polymorphic matrix (amelogenin- and osteocalcin-immunoreactive), depending on the types of mixed tumors. No osteocalcin labeling was found in epithelial tumors. This study confirms that the differentiation of normal and tumor odontogenic cells is accompanied by the expression of some common molecules. Furthermore, the gene products present in normal mesenchymal cells were also shown in odontogenic tumor epithelium. These data may be related to a tumor-specific overexpression of the corresponding genes transcribed at an undetectable level during normal development and/or to an epithelial-mesenchymal transition proposed to occur during normal root formation. A plausible explanation for the results is that the odontogenic tumor epithelial cells are recapitulating genetic programs expressed during normal odontogenesis, but the tumor cells demonstrate abnormal expression patterns for these genes.