Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is useful for diagnosing sarcoidosis

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration facilitating diagnosis of sarcoidosis in a breast cancer patient with multiple lymphadenopathy: a case report

Background

Sarcoidosis is a benign systemic granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology. Cell-mediated immunity disorder is often found in sarcoidosis patients, and an association between malignant tumors and sarcoidosis has been suggested. Sarcoidosis and malignant disease can occur simultaneously or sequentially, leading to misdiagnosis and mistreatment. Sarcoidosis is diagnosed clinically, radiologically, and histologically. We report herein a case of sarcoidosis diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration from the mediastinal lymph nodes of a breast cancer patient.

Case presentation

The patient was a 70-year-old Asian woman who presented with right breast tumor. A 20-mm movable mass was identified in the inferolateral quadrant of the right breast, and mammography revealed a spiculated mass with calcification. Ultrasonography revealed a mass with internal hypoechogenicity, and biopsy revealed estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed multiple lymphadenopathy including mediastinal lymph nodes, with fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in those nodes suggesting breast cancer metastases. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of a mediastinal lymph node revealed noncaseous epithelioid granuloma. Due to a history of uveitis and elevated soluble interleukin 2 receptor, lymphadenopathy due to sarcoidosis and stage IIA breast cancer were diagnosed. Right partial mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were performed after preoperative chemotherapy. No exacerbation of sarcoidosis symptoms has been observed during treatment.

Conclusion

We report a case of breast cancer in which sarcoidosis could be diagnosed based on endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, a history of uveitis, and elevated soluble interleukin 2 receptor despite fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography suggesting multiple lymph node metastases. This report emphasizes the importance of differential diagnosis of lymph node involvements in cancer patients.

Effect of Needle Size on Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis with Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that most commonly involves the lungs. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an invaluable tool in the assessment of patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy. Objective: It has been hypothesized that use of the larger 19-gauge (G) needle with EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic sensitivity in sarcoidosis. However, it is unclear whether the existing literature supports this supposition. Data Sources: A literature search of Embase and Medline was performed by two reviewers. Included articles were evaluated for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data Extraction: For quantitative analysis, we performed a meta-analysis using a binary random-effects model to determine pooled sensitivity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on needle size, use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), study design, and prevalence of sarcoidosis in study group. Synthesis: Sixty-five studies with a total of 4,242 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity for diagnosis of sarcoidosis was 83.99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.22-86.53) among all studies. The 19G subgroup had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.73%; 95% CI, 89.72-97.74%; I² = 0.00%; P < 0.01) compared with the 21G subgroup (84.61%; 95% CI, 78.80-90.42%; I² = 69.83%), 22G subgroup (84.07%; 95% CI, 80.90-87.24%; I² = 85.21%) or unspecified 21G/22G subgroup (78.85%; 95% CI, 70.81-86.90%; I² = 84.47%). There were no significant differences with use of ROSE or prevalence of sarcoidosis or by study design. Conclusions: The use of 19G needles during EBUS-TBNA had the highest diagnostic sensitivity based on available studies. Further randomized controlled trials using 19G needles should be considered in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

T Lymphocyte Maturation Profile in the EBUS-TBNA Lymph Node Depending on the DLCO Parameter in Patients with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis (SA) is a systemic granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology with lung and mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs) as the main location. T lymphocytes play important role in the formation of granulomas in SA, but still little is known about the role of maturation profile in the development of inflammatory changes. The aim of this study was to determine the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells maturation profile in LNs and in peripheral blood (PB) and its relation to disease severity expressed by diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). 29 patients with newly pulmonary SA were studied. Flow cytometry was used for cells evaluation in EBUS-TBNA samples. We observed lower median proportion of T lymphocytes, CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells in patients with DLCO< 80% than in patients with normal diffusion (DLCO > 80%). Patients with DLCO < 80% had lower median proportion of effector and higher median proportion of central memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells than patients with DLCO > 80%. We reported for the first time that LNs CD4+ and CD8+ T cells maturation differs depending on the DLCO value in sarcoidosis. Lymphocytes profiles in LNs may reflect the immune status of patients with SA and can be analysed by flow cytometry of EBUS-TBNA samples.

Combination of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and conventional endoscopic techniques in sarcoidosis diagnosis. Optimal strategy to achieve high diagnostic yield

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of sarcoidosis is based on clinical status and radiologic specific findings. Tissue confirmation of noncaseating granulomas is crucial. Pathological confirmation of pulmonary sarcoidosis is most commonly accomplished by bronchoscopy, which has a diagnostic yield of approximately 60%-70%.

OBJECTIVES

In this prospective study, we analysed potential benefit of EBUS-TBNA and EBB combination, application of cell blocks and smears with puncturing more than one station of lymph nodes in order to determine optimal strategy in diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

About 133 patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis (stage I and stage II) were included in this study. Each patient underwent conventional bronchoscopy with endobronchial biopsy (EBB) followed by the EBUS and puncturing at least two different lymph node stations.

RESULTS

Positive cytopathological verification of sarcoidosis in our study was obtained in 123 patients (92.5%). EBUS-TBNA was diagnostic in 116 patients (87.2%). EBB was positive in 26 patients (19.55%). Combination of EBUS-TBNA and EBB statistically increased diagnostic yield of sarcoidosis to 92.5%. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA with EBB was 93.9%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining EBUS-TBNA from at least two lymph node stations and EBB increased diagnostic yield of sarcoidosis. Such diagnostic strategy had almost 93% of diagnostic yield in stage I and stage II of sarcoidosis. Taking into account the safety of the whole procedure with endobronchial ultrasonography combined with conventional endoscopy with EBB and its cost effectiveness, TBLB can be intended to diagnose stage III or IV of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure.

Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability.

Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality.

Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

Comparison of transbronchial needle aspiration with and without ultrasound guidance for diagnosing benign lymph node adenopathy

Background

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure performed to diagnose lymph node (LN) adenopathy. TBNA with and without endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guidance has a high diagnostic yield for malignant LN enlargement, but the value for diagnosing benign LN enlargement has been less thoroughly investigated.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 3540 patients with mediastinal LN enlargement who received TBNA. One hundred sixty-six patients with benign mediastinal lymphadenopathy were included and 293 LNs were biopsied. A positive result was defined as a specific histological abnormality. Conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and EBUS-TBNA, as well as cTBNA and transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), were compared. The subgroup analysis was stratified by disease type and LN size.

Results

A diagnosis was made in 76.84% of the EBUS-TBNA and 61.31% of the cTBNA (P < 0.05). EBUS-TBNA was superior to cTBNA for both granulomatous (65.18% vs. 45.45%, P < 0.05) and non-granulomatous disease (96.92% vs. 84.06%, P < 0.05). In contrast, the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was higher than that of cTBNA for LNs < 20 mm (79.44% vs. 64.29%, P < 0.05), but for LNs > 20 mm the difference was marginal. These findings were confirmed in a group of independent patients who received cTBNA plus EBUS-TBNA. The diagnostic yield did not differ between cTBNA and TBFB, but significantly increased to 76.67% when both modalities were employed.

Conclusions

EBUS-TBNA is the preferred minimally invasive diagnostic method for benign mediastinal LN disease. Combined cTBNA and TBFB is a safe and feasible alternative when EBUS is unavailable.

Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor level is a predictive marker for EBUS-TBNA-based diagnosis of sarcoidosis

Background:

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely available diagnostic tool for suspected stage I/II sarcoidosis. Combination of EBUS-TBNA and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) has been proposed as diagnostic procedure in clinical settings.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of combined EBUS-TBNA and TBLB and identify the markers correlated with a high diagnostic rate.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 37 patients with suspected stage I/II sarcoidosis with enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT) images. These patients had been scheduled to undergo EBUS-TBNA and TBLB. Serum levels of sarcoidosis markers (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE], soluble interleukin-2 receptor [sIL-2R], and lysozyme), CT findings, and examination techniques were evaluated as predictive markers for diagnosis.

Results:

Of the 37 patients, 32 had undergone both EBUS-TBNA and TBLB, while the remaining 5 patients had only undergone EBUS-TBNA. The diagnosis was confirmed by TBLB in 16 of the 32 patients (50.0%), EBUS-TBNA in 31 of the 37 patients (83.8%), and combined TBLB and EBUS-TBNA in all patients (100.0%). The serum level of sIL-2R, but not that of ACE or lysozyme, was correlated with successful diagnosis by EBUS-TBNA.

Conclusion:

In patients with stage I/II sarcoidosis, the serum level of sIL-2R is a promising and useful marker for predicting the diagnosis by EBUS-TBNA and reducing the burden of additional TBLB and its possible complications. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2020; 37 (1): 8-16)

Role of Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nonmalignant Diseases

Here we present a comprehensive review of the literature concerning the utility of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant conditions and discuss the associated complications. CP-EBUS has been conventionally used for the staging of lung cancer and sampling of mediastinal and hilar nodes. However, its application is not limited to malignant conditions, and it is gaining acceptance as a diagnostic modality of choice for nonmalignant conditions such as tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary embolism, thyroid lesions, and cysts. Moreover, its therapeutic value allows for extended applications such as mediastinal and thyroid cyst drainage, fiducial marker placement for radiation therapy, and transbronchial needle injection. The noninvasiveness, low complication rate, high diagnostic yield, and satisfactory sensitivity and specificity values are the main attributes that lend credence to the use of CP-EBUS as a standalone primary diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pulmonary medicine in the foreseeable future.

A novel, stepwise approach combining conventional and endobronchial ultrasound needle aspiration for mediastinal lymph node sampling

Background and Objectives:

Since the introduction of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), most pulmonary centers use this technique exclusively for mediastinal lymph node (LN) sampling. Conventional “blind” TBNA (cTBNA), however, is cheaper, more accessible, provides more tissue, and requires less training. We evaluated whether sampling of mediastinal LN using EBUS-TBNA or cTBNA according to a predefined set of criteria provides acceptable diagnostic yield.

Materials and Methods:

Sampling method was determined prospectively according to a predefined set of criteria based on LN station, LN size, and presumed diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were evaluated for each modality.

Results:

One hundred and eighty-six biopsies were carried out over a 3-year period (86 cTBNA, 100 EBUS-TBNA). Seventy-seven percent of LN biopsied by EBUS-TBNA were <20 mm, while 83% of cTBNA biopsies were ≥20 mm. Most common sites of cTBNA sampling were station 7, 4R, and 11R as opposed to 7, 11R, 4R, and 4 L in the case of EBUS-TBNA. Most common EBUS-TBNA diagnosis was malignancy versus sarcoidosis in cTBNA. EBUS-TBNA and cTBNA both had a true positive yield of 65%, but EBUS-TBNA had a higher true negative rate (21% vs. 2% for cTBNA) and a lower false negative rate (7% vs. 28%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for EBUS-TBNA were 90%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively, and for cTBNA were 68%, 100%, 100%, and 7%, respectively.

Conclusion:

A stepwise approach based on LN size, station, and presumed diagnosis may be a reasonable, cost-effective approach in choosing between cTBNA and EBUS-TBNA.

Impact of simulation training on performance and outcomes of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration performed by trainees in a tertiary academic hospital

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a high diagnostic yield and low complication rate. Whilst it has been included in international guidelines for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, current results are mostly based on EBUS experts performing EBUS-TBNA in centres of excellence. The impact of simulation training on diagnostic yield, complications, scope damage and repair cost in a real-world teaching hospital is unclear.

Methods

A review of our hospital EBUS-TBNA registry from August 2008 to December 2016 was performed. A positive diagnosis was defined as a confirmed histological or microbiological diagnosis based on EBUS sampling. Complications were classified as major or minor according to the British Thoracic Society guidelines. In addition, we assessed the cost of repairs for scope damage before and after simulation training was implemented. Using CUSUM analysis, the learning curves of individual trainees and the institution were plotted.

Results

There were 608 EBUS-TBNA procedures included in the study. The number of procedures performed by trainees who underwent conventional training was 331 and those who underwent simulation training performed 277 procedures. Diagnostic yield for trainees without simulation training was 88.2% vs. 84.5% for trainees with simulation training (P=0.179). There was no statistical difference in the diagnostic yield between the groups of trainees (OR: 0.781, 95% CI: 0.418-1.460, P=0.438) after adjusting for risk factors. There was an increase in overall complications from 13.6% to 16.6% (OR: 2.247, 95% CI: 1.297-3.891, P=0.004) after introduction of the simulation training, but a trend to decrease in major complications 3.6% to 0.7% (P=0.112). The cost for scope repairs for the trainees without simulation training was SGD 413.88 per procedure vs. SGD 182.79 per procedure for the trainees with simulation training, with the mean difference being SGD 231.09 per procedure (95% CI: 178.40-640.60, P=0.268). CUSUM analysis showed an increasing learning curve for the trainees with simulation training after an initial competency period.

Conclusions

There was no statistical difference in diagnostic yield from EBUS-TBNA and cost of scope damage after simulation training was introduced into our training program. Interestingly, there was an increase in minor complications. CUSUM analysis can provide additional information on institutional learning curves. The value of simulation training in EBUS-TBNA remains uncertain.

How Many Passes Are Needed for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Sarcoidosis? A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

While endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used as an initial diagnostic procedure for pathological confirmation of sarcoidosis, it is unclear how many passes are required to obtain diagnostic materials.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the number of needle passes needed for the diagnosis of stage I/II sarcoidosis using EBUS-TBNA.

METHODS

At three institutions, 109 patients with suspected stage I/II sarcoidosis were recruited and underwent 6 passes of EBUS-TBNA for the main target lesion. Additional EBUS-TBNA for other lesions was permitted. The cumulative yields of needle passes for detecting noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA for 184 lesions. EBUS-TBNA identified specimens containing granulomas in 81 of 92 patients (88%) with a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The cumulative yields through the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth passes for the main target lesion were 63, 75, 82, 85, 86 and 88%, respectively. In the 55 patients that underwent EBUS-TBNA for multiple lesions, the cumulative yields of 2 passes per lesion for 2 lesions (total of 4 passes) and of 4 passes for single lesions were 86 and 84%, respectively (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

If rapid on-site cytological evaluation is not available, we recommend at least 4 passes per patient for either single or multiple lesions with EBUS-TBNA for pathological diagnosis of stage I/II sarcoidosis.

Differential diagnosis of granulomatous lung disease: clues and pitfalls

Granulomatous lung diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that have a wide spectrum of pathologies with variable clinical manifestations and outcomes. Precise clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, pulmonary function testing, radiological imaging including high-resolution computed tomography and often histopathological assessment contribute to make a confident diagnosis of granulomatous lung diseases. Differential diagnosis is challenging, and includes both infectious (mycobacteria and fungi) and noninfectious lung diseases (sarcoidosis, necrotising sarcoid granulomatosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, hot tub lung, berylliosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, rheumatoid nodules, talc granulomatosis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis and bronchocentric granulomatosis). Bronchoalveolar lavage, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, transbronchial cryobiopsy, positron emission tomography and genetic evaluation are potential candidates to improve the diagnostic accuracy for granulomatous lung diseases. As granuloma alone is a nonspecific histopathological finding, the multidisciplinary approach is important for a confident diagnosis.

A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for the accurate differential diagnosis of granulomatous lung diseaseshttp://ow.ly/FxsP30cebtf

The complimentary role of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and endobronchial ultrasound fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is a novel technique that has proved to be useful in diagnosing various interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The use of TBLC to diagnose sarcoidosis in an unselected patient population is unknown, and could be complimentary to endobronchial ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 36 patients in a single, tertiary-care, academic medical center was conducted to describe the yield of both EBUS-FNA and TBLC in the diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis over a three year period. A grading system to evaluate the presence and extent of specific radiographic features on computed tomography chest imaging studies was compared to the results of EBUS-FNA and TBLC. Complications associated with the procedures were also noted.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic yield in our cohort (all pathologic diagnosis considered) was 80.6% (29 out of 36 patients had a definite pathologic diagnosis). Eighteen patients referred for possible sarcoidosis had a positive bronchoscopic specimen confirming the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. For those patients with a pathologic diagnosis of sarcoidosis, the diagnostic yield for EBUS-FNA and TBLC was 66.7% each (12 out of 18 patients), while the combined diagnostic yield for EBUS-FNA and TBLC increased to 100%. For all cases, the pneumothorax rate was 11.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC appears to be a safe and complimentary technique to diagnose sarcoidosis and could be considered part of the diagnostic armamentarium in bronchoscopic centers.

Conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Versus Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration, With or Without Rapid On-Site Evaluation, for the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) as a standalone modality is superior to conventional TBNA (c-TBNA) for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, the overall yield is not different if combined with endobronchial biopsy (EBB) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB). The utility of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in a comparative evaluation of EBUS-TBNA versus c-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Eighty patients with suspected sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1:1:1 into 4 groups: c-TBNA without ROSE (TBNA-NR), c-TBNA with ROSE (TBNA-R), EBUS-TBNA without ROSE (EBUS-NR), and EBUS-TBNA with ROSE (EBUS-R). EBB and TBLB were performed in all patients. Primary objective was detection of granulomas for combined procedure. Secondary objectives were individual procedure yields, sedation dose, and procedure duration. Patients without a diagnosis following c-TBNA subsequently underwent EBUS-TBNA.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis. Overall, granuloma detection was not significantly different between the 4 groups (68% in TBNA-NR, 89% in TBNA-R, 84% in EBUS-NR, and 83% in EBUS-R groups, P=0.49). The yield of c-TBNA in the TBNA-NR group was lower compared with that in TBNA-R group and EBUS-TBNA in EBUS groups (32%, 72%, 68%, and 67% for TBNA-NR, TBNA-R, EBUS-NR, and EBUS-R groups, respectively, P=0.04). Additional 20% patients were diagnosed when EBUS-TBNA was performed following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy procedure in the TBNA-NR group. Sedation requirement and procedure duration were significantly lower with c-TBNA as compared with EBUS-TBNA (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

When performing TBNA in the setting of suspected sarcoidosis, we found c-TBNA with ROSE and EBUS-TBNA (with or without ROSE) to be superior to c-TBNA alone. Whether c-TBNA with ROSE is equivalent to EBUS-TBNA cannot be determined from our study due to small sample size/low power.

Diagnosing Hodgkin Lymphoma From an Endobronchial Ultrasound Core Needle Biopsy

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) commonly presents as isolated mediastinal adenopathy. Although there is evidence to support minimally invasive techniques such as endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) fine-needle aspiration as the initial diagnostic test for suspected lymphoma involving the mediastinum, it consistently performs the poorest at definitively diagnosing HL for a variety of reasons, and therefore histology specimens are usually required. We present a case of HL presenting as isolated mediastinal adenopathy that was definitively diagnosed on EBUS using a 22 G coring needle in which cellular and histologic specimens were obtained, allowing the core biopsy to be fixed in formalin and treated as a surgical specimen. The patient started treatment soon after the procedure without requiring any further invasive tests. Although it seems intuitive that a coring EBUS needle would be advantageous in diseases such as HL, further studies are needed before definitive recommendations can be made.

Usefulness of Conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Sampling of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is recognized as a valuable tool for the sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes. In this study, we report data about the diagnostic yield of conventional TBNA in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer.

METHODS

All patients with suspected lung cancer who underwent bronchoscopy with conventional TBNA in the years 2008 to 2012 were evaluated. TBNA was performed on mediastinal lymph nodes enlarged at chest computed tomography scan and/or with increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. Cytologic results derived from TBNA have been compared, with the final diagnosis obtained with other more invasive procedures and/or with a clinical-radiologic follow-up of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

TBNA was performed on 375 patients. However, 19 patients were lost to follow-up, and data from 356 patients with a total 459 TBNA specimens were analyzed. TBNA was positive for metastatic involvement of lymph nodes in 172 of 282 patients with cancer, with a sensitivity of 61%. Sensitivity achieved 65% when we considered the total of 459 TBNA specimens. The overall diagnostic accuracy of TBNA was 69%. The nodal stations more frequently examined were 7 (subcarinal: 190 TBNAs), 4R (right lower paratracheal: 147 TBNAs), and 10R (right hilar: 76 TBNAs), with a sensitivity of 66%, 66%, and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conventional TBNA remains a useful method for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, with a good diagnostic yield in several nodal stations.

Yield of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: impact of operator and cytopathologist experience

Background

Studies have reported a high diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. We sought to review the yield of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis at our institution over time, and examine factors that may influence this yield.

Methods

Patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis between December 2008 and November 2011 were identified. EBUS was performed without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of samples. The final diagnosis was based on the results of all invasive diagnostic procedures and/or clinical follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effect of various factors on yield.

Results

43 patients underwent 45 EBUS-TBNA procedures for suspected sarcoidosis. A total of 115 lymph nodes were sampled. The 21 G needle was used in 51% of procedures. The mean number of lymph node stations sampled was 2.6 (SD 0.7) and the mean number of needle passes per procedure was 7.8 (SD 2.0). Non-necrotising granulomatous inflammation was detected in EBUS-TBNA samples from 34/45 (76%) procedures. The overall diagnostic yield increased to 36/45 (80%) following a cytopathology review for this study. Needle gauge, number of lymph node stations sampled and number of needle passes were not associated with diagnostic yield. The yield of EBUS-TBNA increased significantly after the first 15 procedures performed for suspected sarcoidosis; the 2 additional cases diagnosed after the cytopathology review were part of this early experience.

Conclusions

EBUS-TBNA is a valuable technique for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis when performed without ROSE. The yield of the procedure improved significantly over time, based on operator and cytopathologist experience.

Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

The diagnosis of sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease, is based on a compatible clinical-radiological picture and the histological evidence of noncaseating granulomas. Other diseases mimicking sarcoidosis, mostly infections and other granulomatoses, have to be excluded. There is no single test for sarcoidosis, and the presence of granulomas alone does not establish the diagnosis. Symptoms of sarcoidosis are not specific and can be markedly different according to organ involvement and disease course. Respiratory symptoms and fatigue are the most common symptoms at any stage of disease. Histological confirmation is not needed for Löfgren's or Heerfordt's syndrome and asymptomatic bihilar lymphadenopathy. The radiological staging system is still based on chest radiography, and computed tomography is not mandatory for routine follow-up. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography may be of value in special cases. For assessment of lung involvement and follow-up, pulmonary function tests are necessary with vital capacity being the most important single parameter and diffusion capacity the most sensitive. Bronchoscopy with biopsy is the most common procedure for detection of granulomas, when there is no easier biopsy site like skin or peripheral lymph nodes. Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration has replaced mediastinoscopy for evaluation of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with a high diagnostic yield. Despite numerous studies, no single biomarker can be reliably used for correct diagnosis or exclusion of sarcoidosis. Genetic testing, despite promising advances, has still not been included in routine care for sarcoidosis patients. The long-term prognosis of sarcoidosis depends on the different organ manifestations: Cardiac or central nervous involvement, together with respiratory complications, is critical. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for comprehensive care of the sarcoidosis patient.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is useful as an initial procedure for the diagnosis of lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for evaluating hilar, mediastinal and central parenchymal lesions has been well established. However, its utility for diagnosing lymphoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of EBUS-TBNA for the definitive diagnosis of de novo lymphoma with subtype classification.

METHODS

Patients with lymphoma who underwent EBUS-TBNA for diagnostic purposes at a single institution between March 2004 and May 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 971 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA during the study period, 19 patients, who did not have a previous history of lymphoma, had a final diagnosis of lymphoma. EBUS-TBNA provided a diagnosis accompanied with subtype classification in 6 patients (32%), a suspicious but not definitive classification in 10 patients (53%), and a negative classification in 3 patients (16%). Immunohistochemical staining for definitive diagnosis was performed in 15 of 16 patients (94%), with suspicious results from routine hematoxylin and eosin staining. No procedure-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a useful initial diagnostic procedure, aiding decisions for the management of patients with suspected lymphoma, even though the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosing lymphoma with subtype classification was lower than previously reported.

Ten Years of Linear Endobronchial Ultrasound: Evidence of Efficacy, Safety and Cost-effectiveness

Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is one of the major landmarks in the history of bronchoscopy. In the 10 years since it was introduced, a vast body of literature on the procedure and its results support the use of this technique in the study of various mediastinal and pulmonary lesions. This article is a comprehensive, systematic review of all the available scientific evidence on the more general indications for this technique. Results of specific studies on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness available to date are examined. The analysis shows that EBUS-TBNA is a safe, cost-effective technique with a high grade of evidence that is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and mediastinal staging of patients with suspected or confirmed lung cancer. However, more studies are needed to guide decision-making in the case of a negative result. Evidence on the role of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and extrathoracic malignancies is also high, but much lower when used in the study of tuberculosis, lymphoma and for the re-staging of lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nevertheless, due to its good safety record and lack of invasiveness compared to surgical techniques, the grade of evidence for recommending EBUS-TBNA as the initial diagnostic test in patients with these diseases is very high in most cases.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration vs conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is superior to conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA) in the staging of lung cancer. However, its efficiency in diagnosis of sarcoidosis when combined with endobronchial biopsy (EBB) and transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) has not been studied. This randomized controlled trial compares diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA vs cTBNA in combination with EBB and TBLB.

METHODS

Patients with clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1 to EBUS-TBNA or cTBNA. All patients underwent TBLB and EBB. The primary outcome was detection of granulomas. The secondary end points were the individual and cumulative yields of various procedures, serious adverse events, and procedure time.

RESULTS

Of the 130 patients, sarcoidosis was diagnosed in 117 (62 cTBNA, 55 EBUS-TBNA). The two groups were similar at baseline. Granulomas were demonstrated in 104 (53 cTBNA, 51 EBUS-TBNA) patients and were similar in two groups (85.5% vs 92.7%, P = .34). Individually, EBUS-TBNA had the highest yield (41 of 55, 74.5%), which was better than cTBNA (30 of 62, 48.4%, P = .004) or EBB (40 of 111, 36.3%, P < .0001) but not TBLB (78 of 112, 69.6%, P = .54). Adding EBB/TBLB to cTBNA led to an increase in granuloma detection, whereas the addition of TBLB (but not EBB) significantly enhanced the yield of EBUS-TBNA. The procedure time was significantly longer with EBUS-TBNA. No major adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Individually, EBUS-TBNA has the highest diagnostic yield in sarcoidosis, but it should be combined with TBLB for the optimal yield. The diagnostic yield of cTBNA (plus EBB and TBLB) is similar to EBUS-TBNA plus TBLB.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01908868; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Determining factors in diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

BACKGROUND

Although the role of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in pulmonary sarcoidosis has previously been investigated, the determining factors in diagnosing sarcoidosis by EBUS-TBNA without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) are unclear.

METHODS

Patients with clinically and radiographically suspected sarcoidosis underwent EBUS-TBNA without ROSE in a prospective study. Presence of non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas was pathologic evidence of sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

The EBUS-TBNA was performed in 120 patients, 111 of whom had confirmed sarcoidosis. For the patients with sarcoidosis (62 stage I, 49 stage II) EBUS-TBNA provided sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 93.69%, 100%, 100%, 56.25%, and 94.17%, respectively, in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was associated with disease stage, but not associated with serum angiotensin converting enzyme level, number of lymph node stations sampled per patient, or total number of passes performed per patient. At EBUS-TBNA, 284 mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were aspirated in 111 patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that short-axis diameter and more than 1 needle pass per lymph node were independent risk factors associated with positive pathology. No major procedure-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is a safe procedure with high sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis, having a higher diagnostic yield in stage I than stage II. To obtain a higher diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in pulmonary sarcoidosis without ROSE, operators should select the largest mediastinal or hilar lymph node accessible and puncture with 3 to 5 passes.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosis of sarcoidosis in clinically unselected study populations

Literature suggests that ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has excellent performance characteristics for diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, many authors challenge the external validity of EBUS-TBNA results, as most studies were performed in referral centres by highly experienced investigators, and included populations with very high sarcoidosis prevalence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the role of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of sarcoidosis in studies enrolling consecutive patients with lymphadenopathy detected at imaging studies, regardless of the suspected underlying clinical aetiology. The Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were screened to identify the pertinent literature. Quality of eligible studies was assessed by Quality Assessment, Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 criteria. Pooled diagnostic yield, sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed. Subgroup analysis was planned to identify possible sources of study heterogeneity. Fourteen studies, collectively involving 2097 patients, fulfilled eligibility criteria. The median prevalence of sarcoidosis was 15%. EBUS-TBNA had a pooled diagnostic yield of 0.79 (standard deviation, 0.24), a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.88) and a pooled specificity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Only subgroup analysis exploring the influence of study design seemed to influence the observed inter-study heterogeneity for sensitivity, retrospective studies showing worst sensitivity than prospective ones. The results of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of sarcoidosis in clinically unselected populations are excellent and compare favourably with published results from studies conducted in selected populations. High-quality trials would be needed to evaluate factors possibly explaining the observed heterogeneity in sensitivity.

Teaching conventional transbronchial needle aspiration. A continuum

Proponents of the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) propose that in this era of EBUS-TBNA, training for conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) should be abandoned. The authors of this editorial provide the opposing view. C-TBNA has a short and a steep learning curve and adds to the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in a cost-effective fashion. Considering its simplicity, availability, affordability, safety, and several unique indications, C-TBNA continues to contribute to the welfare of patients worldwide. It should remain as an integral part of pulmonary fellowship training programs.

A study of patients with isolated mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy undergoing EBUS-TBNA

Background

Isolated mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (IMHL) may be caused by benign and malignant disorders or be ‘reactive’. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a reported low negative predictive value (NPV) in IMHL, necessitating mediastinoscopy in selected patients. The aim of this study was to examine the NPV of EBUS-TBNA in an IMHL population and determine whether clinical variables differentiate between pathological and reactive IMHL.

Methods

Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients with IMHL referred to a single UK centre for EBUS-TBNA.

Results

100 patients with IMHL had EBUS-TBNA during the study (March 2010–February 2013), mean age 58.6±15.7 years, 63% men, 70% white British and mean follow-up 16.8±8.6 months. Pathological cause of IMHL established in 52 patients (sarcoidosis n=20, tuberculosis n=18, carcinoma n=7, lymphoma n=6, benign cyst n=1), 43 from EBUS-TBNA. 48/57 negative EBUS-TBNA samples were true negatives reflecting reactive lymphadenopathy in 48%. The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was 91% and NPV was 84.2% (95% CI 72.6% to 91.5%). Multivariate analysis of clinical covariates showed age (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13; p=0.033), the presence of a relevant comorbidity (OR 9.49, 95% CI 2.20 to 41.04; p=0.003) and maximum lymph node size (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.83; p=0.00004) to differentiate between reactive and pathological IMHL. Stratification of the study population according to comorbidity and maximum lymph node size (<20 mm) identified a low-risk cohort (n=32) where the NPV of EBUS-TBNA was 93.8% (95% CI 79.9% to 98.3%).

Conclusions

Reactive lymphadenopathy accounts for a significant proportion of patients with IMHL. In carefully selected patients with IMHL and a negative EBUS-TBNA, surveillance rather than further invasive sampling may be an appropriate strategy.

Prospective analysis of efficacy and safety of an individualized-midazolam-dosing protocol for sedation during prolonged bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

Newer more advanced techniques in bronchoscopy may require longer procedure times, although a standard protocol for sedation during prolonged bronchoscopy has not yet been defined.

METHODS

We designed a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study (UMIN trial number 000003971) using patient questionnaires and vital sign monitoring to assess the efficacy and safety of a standardized midazolam dosing protocol based on gender and age for use during bronchoscopy. The loading dose of midazolam was 0.075mg/kg for men ≤65 years old and women ≤70 and 0.05mg/kg for men ≥66 years and women ≥71 years, with subsequent doses of one-half the loading dose to be administered every 20min. The primary endpoint was tolerability and secondary endpoints included anxiety and recall of procedure, willingness to undergo repeat procedure, and complications. Safety was evaluated in terms of monitored changes in blood pressures, ECG, oxygen saturation, and CO2 content in expiration during the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 204 patients were included in the study. Overall, 163 patients (79.9%) reported "no distress" during the procedure, 185 patients (90.7%) reported "no anxiety," and 175 (85.8%) replied that they would accept a repeat procedure, if necessary. The mean minimum oxygen saturation was 90.2% and the mean maximum expiratory CO2 level was 37.7mmHg. There were no serious complications related to the protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The midazolam dosing protocol examined in this study was safe and effective. It is simple, and it could easily be translated to routine clinical practice.

Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosis of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an accurate and minimally invasive technique used routinely for investigation of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. However, few studies have addressed its role in comparison to the traditional diagnostic approaches of transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), endobronchial biopsy (EBB), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. We evaluated the usefulness of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis compared to TBLB, EBB, and BAL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis (stage I and II) on chest radiography and chest computed tomography were included. All 33 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA, TBLB, EBB, and BAL during the same session between July 2009 and June 2011. EBUS-TBNA was performed at 71 lymph node stations.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 33 patients, were diagnosed with histologically proven sarcoidosis; two patients were compatible with a clinical diagnosis of sarcoidosis during follow-up; and two patients were diagnosed with metastatic carcinoma and reactive lymphadenopathy, respectively. Among 29 patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis in combination with EBUS-TBNA, TBLB, and EBB, only EBUS-TBNA and TBLB revealed noncaseating granuloma in 18 patients and one patient, respectively. The overall diagnostic sensitivities of EBUS-TBNA, TBLB, EBB, and BAL (CD4/CD8 ≥3.5) were 90%, 35%, 6%, and 71%, respectively (p<0.001). The combined diagnostic sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA, TBLB, and EBB was 94%.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA was the most sensitive method for diagnosing stage I and II sarcoidosis compared with conventional bronchoscopic procedures. EBUS-TBNA should be considered first for the histopathologic diagnosis of stage I and II sarcoidosis.

Endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial needle aspiration vs. conventional transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses: A meta-analysis

Whether an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is required for transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses is currently a disputed subject. Previous studies have demonstrated that EBUS-TBNA performs better compared to conventional TBNA as it is capable of sampling in real-time compared with conventional TBNA. However, some clinicians consider conventional TBNA to be sufficient for diagnosis. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated these two methods according to diagnostic yield. A search was conducted through PubMed, Embase and the proceedings of major conferences, for studies comparing TBNA with EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. The identified studies were evaluated for publication bias and heterogeneity. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the fixed-effects model. Five studies, including a total of 407 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The EBUS-TBNA arm was associated with a significantly higher OR compared to that of the TBNA arm in terms of diagnostic yield (OR=2.72, 95% CI: 1.72-4.30, P<0.001). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (I²=0%, P=0.540) or publication bias (Egger's test, P=0.568; Begg-Mazumdar test, P=0.806). In conclusion, EBUS-TBNA and conventional TBNA are safe and provide good diagnostic yield in the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal masses and lymphadenopathies; however, EBUS-TBNA performs better compared to conventional TBNA, with a shorter aspiration time and higher sensitivity.

Utility and morphologic features of granulomas on rapid on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is increasingly used to sample central lung lesions and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. We investigate the utility of EBUS-guided FNA and concomitant rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to diagnose granulomas, the morphologic characteristics of granulomas on ROSE, and how the diagnosis of granulomas changed the clinical impression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All pathologic reports and associated clinical records of patients who had EBUS-guided FNA of the lungs or mediastinal lymph nodes that yielded granulomas were reviewed with at least a 1-year follow-up after EBUS-guided FNA. All ROSE slides were rereviewed to evaluate granulomas for quantity, necrosis, and cohesion.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, 882 EBUS-guided FNAs were performed. One hundred and twelve patients (49% male, average age 50.8 years, range 16-83) had 161 EBUS-guided FNAs that yielded granulomas (18%). The etiologies of the granulomas were as follows: sarcoidosis (54%), infection (12%), malignancy (5%), inflammatory bowel disease-related lymphadenopathy (1%), and no specific clinical etiology (28%). Of the patients with EBUS-guided FNAs, 98 had ROSE performed (87.5%) and granulomas were seen in 70 of these patients (71%). Granulomas associated with sarcoidosis were mostly well-formed and non-necrotizing (90%). The results of the EBUS-guided FNA changed or redefined the clinical diagnosis in 79 patients (71%).

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-guided FNA with concurrent ROSE is a useful technique for the diagnosis of granulomas. The quality and quantity of granulomas detected during ROSE may suggest an etiology and help direct ancillary testing.

Linear EBUS in staging non-small cell lung cancer and diagnosing benign diseases

As an evolving technique, linear endobronchial ultrasound is becoming the first choice and standard of care not only to diagnose the malignant and benign mediastinal lesions but also to stage non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women. The disease causes more death compared with colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers combined in the United States. Staging of lung cancer determines the prognosis. The type of lung cancer has changed in the past few decades. The frequency of adenocarcinoma has increased, whereas squamous cell carcinoma now is less frequent. Determining the cell type and its molecular characteristics allow targeted treatments in adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis of indeterminate mediastinal lymph nodes or masses and staging lung cancer might be challenging. This article will review the principles and clinical utility of endobronchial ultrasound in mediastinal lesions.

Diagnostic value of blood clot core during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is being increasingly used in the sampling of pulmonary masses and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The blood clot core (BCC) often obtained during EBUS-TBNA may not be a true core and therefore may not be submitted for histological analysis. The frequency in which the blood clot core is positive in patients with negative cytology undergoing EBUS-TBNA is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of the blood clot core obtained during EBUS-TBNA.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review was performed from January through September 2011 for all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA at The Ohio State University. The data collection included cytology and histology results for each procedure. Blood clot cores obtained from the EBUS-TBNA needle were sent in formalin for histological examination.

RESULTS

Seventy patients underwent EBUS-TBNA and 51 (72.8 %) patients had procedures that yielded a BCC for histology and aspirate for cytology. Forty-nine percent of patients with a BCC were diagnosed with malignancy. Of those with a BCC obtained, five (9.8 %) patients diagnosed with malignancy were done so based only on the results of blood clot core alone with negative cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood clot cores obtained at EBUS-TBNA contain diagnostic material and should be subjected histopathological examination. When blood clot cores are sent for analysis, there is the potential to spare up to 10 % of patients more invasive diagnostic biopsy procedures.

Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing lung cancer: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Although rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) is widely used during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), its role remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of ROSE during EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients highly suspected of having lung cancer who had hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy or a tumor adjacent to the central airway were enrolled in this study and randomized to undergo EBUS-TBNA with or without ROSE.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with visible endobronchial lesions were excluded in the analysis. Thus, a total of 108 patients (55 in the ROSE group, 53 in the non-ROSE group) were analyzed. Additional procedures including EBUS-TBNA for lesions other than the main target lesion and/or transbronchial biopsy in the same setting were performed in 11% of patients in the ROSE group and 57% in the non-ROSE group (p < 0.001). Mean puncture number was significantly lower in the ROSE group (2.2 vs. 3.1 punctures, p < 0.001), and mean bronchoscopy time was similar between both groups (22.3 vs. 22.1 min, p = 0.95). The sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing lung cancer were 88 and 89% in the ROSE group, and 86 and 89% in the non-ROSE group, respectively. No complications were associated with the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE during EBUS-TBNA is associated with a significantly lower need for additional bronchoscopic procedures and puncture number.

Echoic features of lymph nodes with sarcoidosis determined by endobronchial ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique with a high diagnostic yield used in the investigation of mediastinal diseases including sarcoidosis. Although previous reports have discussed the echoic features of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer, few have addressed those features of mediastinal lymph nodes with sarcoidosis. We therefore investigated whether the echoic features of lymph nodes with sarcoidosis are distinct when compared to those of metastatic lymph nodes in lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was held in one university hospital between April 2007 and June 2011. EBUS-guided biopsies were performed on 219 patients, and thus resulting in sarcoidosis diagnoses in 53 patients. We quantitatively analyzed the echoic morphologic features of 42 lymph nodes from 34 sarcoidosis patients and 59 lymph nodes from 44 patients with lung cancer using digital image analyzing software.

RESULTS

In patients with sarcoidosis, 64.3% of the lymph nodes had a round shape, 71.4% had a distinct margin, and 88.1% exhibited homogeneous echogenicity. A germinal center structure was observed in 71.4% of the cases. In the context of shape and margin, no significant difference could be observed between sarcoidosis and lung cancer metastasis. However, homogeneous low echogenicity and the presence of a germinal center structure were observed in sarcoidosis more frequently than in lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Homogeneous low echogenicity and the presence of a germinal central structure may be distinctive echoic features of lymph nodes with sarcoidosis. Analyzing the echogenicity of the mediastinal lymph nodes may help to distinguish sarcoidosis from lung cancer.

Modified technique for obtaining mediastinal samples with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results from a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a widely-accepted method for obtaining both benign and malignant mediastinal lymph node samples. We present the results obtained with a modification that simplifies sampling, known as fine-needle capillary sampling or EBUS-FNC.

METHODS

A prospective observational study with 44 consecutive patients who underwent EBUS at the University of Navarra Clinic in Pamplona (Spain). All samples were obtained by EBUS-FNC instead of by conventional EBUS-TBNA. No suction was used, and the internal stylus was not completely withdrawn at any time.

RESULTS

The examination of the mediastinum by means of EBUS identified the presence of lymphadenopathies or mediastinal masses in 38 patients (86.4%). Samples were taken from more than one lymph node in 23 patients (52.3%). EBUS-FNC provided adequate and representative material for interpretation in all patients, and diagnostic performance was 87%. Sensitivity for the detection of lung cancer with EBUS-FNC was 84%. Mild complications were only recorded in two patients (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that EBUS-FNC is a safe technique, comparable to EBUS-TBNA in efficacy, and is able to obtain adequate samples.

Repair costs for endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopes

BACKGROUND

The development of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has revolutionized the diagnostic approach to lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The capital costs associated with implementing EBUS are easily obtained from manufacturers, but the ongoing maintenance and repair costs are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to delineate the maintenance and repair costs associated with EBUS.

METHODS

For the period between October 2005 and June 30, 2009, the number of procedures and the maintenance and repair costs for both EBUS and flexible bronchoscopes were recorded. Two BF-160UCF-OL8 (Olympus, Canada) linear convex EBUS bronchoscopes were used for EBUS procedures during the course of the study. Total costs were calculated on a yearly basis and on a per procedure basis for EBUS and standard bronchoscopes and are presented in Canadian and US dollars ($1 CAN=$0.88 USD).

RESULTS

During the period of October 2005 and June 2009, a total of 949 linear convex EBUS procedures and 2767 flexible bronchoscopies were carried out. During this period, 13 separate repair issues were encountered with the EBUS bronchoscopes and control unit. The total cost for maintenance and repair of the EBUS and flexible bronchoscopes was $110,151.46 ($96,933.28 USD) and $67,301.49 ($59,225.31 USD), respectively. The average cost per procedure for EBUS and flexible bronchoscopy was $116.00 ($102.08 USD) and $24.32 ($21.42 USD), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of EBUS repairs per procedure is significant and illustrates the importance of understanding the ongoing maintenance issues inherent in these delicate pieces of medical equipment.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration prevents mediastinoscopies in the diagnosis of isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a prospective trial

RATIONALE

Patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy (IML) are a common presentation to physicians, and mediastinoscopy is traditionally considered the "gold standard" investigation when a pathological diagnosis is required. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as an alternative to mediastinoscopy in patients with lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and health care costs of EBUS-TBNA as an alternative initial investigation to mediastinoscopy in patients with isolated IML.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter single-arm clinical trial of 77 consecutive patients with IML from 5 centers between April 2009 and March 2011. All patients underwent EBUS-TBNA. If EBUS-TBNA did not provide a diagnosis, then participants underwent mediastinoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

EBUS-TBNA prevented 87% of mediastinoscopies (95% confidence interval [CI], 77-94%; P < 0.001) but failed to provide a diagnosis in 10 patients (13%), all of whom underwent mediastinoscopy. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA in patients with IML were 92% (95% CI, 83-95%) and 40% (95% CI, 12-74%), respectively. One patient developed a lower respiratory tract infection after EBUS-TBNA, requiring inpatient admission. The cost of the EBUS-TBNA procedure per patient was £1,382 ($2,190). The mean cost of the EBUS-TBNA strategy was £1,892 ($2,998) per patient, whereas a strategy of mediastinoscopy alone was significantly more costly at £3,228 ($5,115) per patient (P < 0.001). The EBUS-TBNA strategy is less costly than mediastinoscopy if the cost per EBUS-TBNA procedure is less than £2,718 ($4,307) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a safe, highly sensitive, and cost-saving initial investigation in patients with IML. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00932854).

Prospective study of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes versus transbronchial lung biopsy of lung tissue for diagnosis of sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been reported to be an accurate and safe method to confirm a pathologic diagnosis of sarcoidosis. However, only a few retrospective or small prospective studies have been published on EBUS-TBNA versus transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), which has been the standard method for making a pathologic diagnosis of sarcoidosis so far. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and TBLB through a flexible bronchoscope in patients with stage I and II sarcoidosis.

METHODS

A total of 62 patients with suspected stage I and II sarcoidosis were included in this prospective study. EBUS-TBNA was performed (2 lymph nodes, 2 needle passes for each lymph node), followed by TBLB (5 biopsy specimens from multiple lung segments) in the same setting. The final diagnosis of sarcoidosis was based on clinicoradiologic compatibility and pathologic findings.

RESULTS

Of the 62 patients enrolled, 54 were given a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and TBLB for sarcoidois by showing noncaseating epithelioid cell granuloma was 94% (stage I, 97%; stage II, 88%) and 37% (stage I, 31%; stage II, 50%), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < .001). One case of pneumothorax and 3 cases of moderate bleeding (7%) resulted from TBLB, and 1 case of severe cough (2%) from EBUS-TBNA.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for stage I and II sarcoidosis is higher than for TBLB.

Scientific evidence and principles for the use of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), using the radial EBUS probe and convex-probe EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, are increasingly advocated for a wide array of minimally invasive thoracic procedures. The effectiveness of EBUS-guided procedures has been demonstrated to a degree that, in many institutions, EBUS is becoming standard of practice for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in lung cancer, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, and for bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions. Its role in other bronchoscopic procedures requires further study despite an already strong body of literature: diagnosis of lymphoma and benign infectious disease, diagnosis of early lung cancer and airway wall disorders, imaging of thoracic vascular disease such as pulmonary embolism, and therapeutic procedures such as placement of fiducial markers. In this article, we illustrate some of the principles of EBUS, describe major technical aspects pertaining to the procedure itself and provide a narrative review of original research addressing proposed roles of EBUS in a variety of indications. In closing, we describe future perspectives including new educational processes and philosophies that could favorably impact the rapid and safe dissemination of this evolving technology into clinical practice.