Performance characteristics and predictors of yield from transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

Novel electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy system for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules: a prospective, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Traditional electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is a real-time image-guided system and used with thick bronchoscopes for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). A novel ENB that could be used with thin bronchoscopes was developed. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the experience of using this ENB system in a real clinical scenario.

METHODS

This multicentre study enrolled consecutive patients with PPNs adopting ENB from March 2019 to August 2021. ENB was performed with different bronchoscopes, ancillary techniques and sampling instruments according to the characteristics of the nodule and the judgement of the operator. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints included the diagnostic yield of subgroups, procedural details and complication rate.

RESULTS

In total, 479 patients with 479 nodules were enrolled in this study. The median lesion size was 20.9 (IQR, 15.9-25.9) mm. The overall diagnostic yield was 74.9% (359/479). A thin bronchoscope was used in 96.2% (461/479) nodules. ENB in combination with radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS), a guide sheath (GS) and a thin bronchoscope was the most widely used guided method, producing a diagnostic yield of 74.1% (254/343). The median total procedural time was 1325.0 (IQR, 1014.0-1676.0) s. No severe complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

This novel ENB system can be used in combination with different bronchoscopes, ancillary techniques and sampling instruments with a high diagnostic yield and safety profile for the diagnosis of PPNs, of which the combination of thin bronchoscope, rEBUS and GS was the most common method in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03716284.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains a challenge for physicians. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been applied in the diagnosis of PPLs, but its diagnostic rate varies widely. The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to figure out the accuracy and safety of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of PPLs. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for relevant studies published from January 1, 2000 to December 30, 2021 and used PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) to worked out the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBNA in PPLs. Two reviewers independently performed the data extraction and assessed study quality. Statistical analysis was carried out via R software. In 7 studies of totally 510 patients of PPLs, the overall EBUS-TBNA diagnosis yield is 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.84) by the random effect model. EBUS-TBNA showed a higher accuracy of 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74) compared to 0.46 (95% CI 0.19-0.72) of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) when EBUS probe is adjacent to lesions. In the case of malignant lesions, the diagnostic rate of EBUS-TBNA is 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.88). Combined EBUS-TBNA with conventional bronchoscopy procedures showed the highest diagnostic yield (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87)). Collectively, EBUS-TBNA should be performed firstly in patients with PPLs suspected to lung cancer especially when the EBUS probe was adjacent to the lesions. No serious procedure-related complications were observed.

Inheritance and innovation of the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions

As the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, early detection and diagnosis are crucial to reduce the mortality of lung cancer. To date, the diagnosis of the peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains a major unmet clinical need. The urgency of diagnosing PPLs has driven a series of development of the advanced bronchoscopy-guided techniques in the past decades, such as radial probe-endobronchial ultrasonography (RP-EBUS), virtual bronchoscopy navigation (VBN), electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB), bronchoscopic transparenchymal nodule access (BTPNA), and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. However, these techniques also have their own limitations. In this review, we would like to introduce the development of diagnostic techniques for PPLs, with a special focus on biopsy approaches and advanced guided bronchoscopy techniques by discussing their advantages, limitations, and future prospects.

Suitability of transbronchial needle aspiration for genotyping peripheral pulmonary tumors

Background

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a sampling tool that has demonstrated a higher accuracy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL) compared to other techniques. However, there are no studies investigating the value of TBNA in defining the genotype of peripheral lung cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of TBNA in defining the molecular characteristics of peripheral lung cancer.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent TBNA for the diagnosis of a PPL at the Pulmonary Unit of the Azienda Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona (Italy) between January 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. TBNA was performed under fluoroscopic guidance and the additional support of an ultrasound miniprobe, with an ultrathin bronchoscope with a flexible 21G needle. Samples were smeared on glass slides for cytological evaluation and flushed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for cell-blocks.

Results

154 patients were enrolled:55 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 21 with squamous cell carcinoma. TBNA correctly diagnosed 43/55 (78.2%) patients with adenocarcinoma and 17/21 (81.0%) patients with squamous cell carcinoma, with a sensitivity of 77.5%. Complete genotyping for guiding targeted therapies was obtained in 52 patients (86.6%).

Conclusions

TBNA is a valid tool for the diagnosis of PPL, allowing a correct diagnosis and a complete genotyping of the tumors in a considerable proportion of patients.

Transbronchial needle aspiration with endobronchial ultrasonography and ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

BACKGROUND

Although the efficacy of lung cancer treatment has improved, it is dependent on a reliable diagnosis via bronchoscopy. Transbronchial biopsy using ultrathin bronchoscopy can help detect small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), with a high diagnostic yield. However, the diagnosis rate using forceps biopsy when the radial endobronchial ultrasonography (rEBUS) probe is adjacent to a lesion tends to be low. Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) may improve the diagnostic yield from adjacent lesions. Recently, PeriView FLEX, a new TBNA needle that can be inserted into ultrathin bronchoscopes, has become available. We examined whether TBNA with PeriView FLEX and forceps biopsy improved adjacent lesion diagnosis when using ultrathin bronchoscopes.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 51 consecutive patients who underwent TBNA and forceps biopsy using ultrathin bronchoscopes under rEBUS for small PPLs at the Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between November 2019 and August 2020. The histological diagnosis rate using TBNA and forceps biopsy, TBNA alone, or forceps biopsy alone was compared between cases where the rEBUS probe was "Within" and "Adjacent To" the lesions.

RESULTS

The diagnosis rate using TBNA and forceps biopsy was 86.3% (95.7% vs. 78.6%; p = 0.08) for all lesions (Within cases vs. Adjacent To cases). The corresponding rate using TBNA alone was 68.6% (69.6% vs. 67.9%; p = 0.57), and that using forceps biopsy alone was 72.5% (91.3% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.0067).

CONCLUSIONS

Forceps biopsy with TBNA during ultrathin bronchoscopy for small PPLs improved the diagnostic yield when lesions were adjacent to the rEBUS probe.

Multi-modal tissue sampling in cone beam CT guided navigation bronchoscopy: comparative accuracy of different sampling tools and rapid on-site evaluation of cytopathology

Background

Advanced technological aids are frequently used to improve outcome of transbronchial diagnostics for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Even when lesion access has been confirmed by 3D imaging, obtaining an accurate tissue sample however remains difficult. In this single institution study, we evaluate the comparative accuracy of different sampling methodologies and the accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation of cytopathology (ROSE) in navigation bronchoscopy cases where imaging has confirmed the catheter to have accurately accessed the lesion.

Methods

All consecutive navigation bronchoscopies in between December 2017– June 2020 performed in a room with a cone beam CT (CBCT) system where catheter position was intra-procedurally confirmed to be within or adjacent to the lesion by cone beam CT and augmented fluoroscopy were included. Individual tool outcomes were compared against one another and follow-up outcome.

Results

A mean of 11.39 samples using 2.93 tools were obtained in 225 lesions (median diameter 15 mm, 195 patients). A correct diagnosis was most often obtained by forceps (accuracy 70.6%), followed by 1.1 mm cryoprobe (68.4%), needle aspiration (46.7%), 1.9 mm cryoprobe (41.2%), brush (30.3%) and lavage (23.7%). Procedural outcome corresponded to follow-up outcome in 75.1% of lesions (80.5% of patients). Accurately diagnosed lesions were sampled significantly more often (11.91 vs. 9.72 samples, P=0.014). In cases where procedural outcome proved malignant, ROSE had also detected this in 47.5%.

Conclusions

Of all clinically available biopsy tools, the forceps showed most often accurate. However, extensive multi-modal sampling resulted in highest diagnostic accuracy. A hypothetical multi-modal approach of only using forceps and needle aspiration provided eventual diagnostic outcome in 91.7% of successfully diagnosed lesions. In the circumstances of our study, confirmation of malignancy on ROSE did not reduce number of biopsies taken nor biopsy time. Future research on how to improve the accuracy and effectivity of tissue sampling is needed.

Technologies for targeting the peripheral pulmonary nodule including robotics

Bronchoscopic sampling of PPL was significantly advanced by the development of the endobronchial ultrasound guide sheath method in the 1990s. Since then, a range of technical and procedural techniques have further advanced diagnostic yields. These include the use of thinner bronchoscopes with better working channel diameters, understanding the importance of peripheral transbronchial needle aspiration, and virtual bronchoscopic assistance. These have enabled better sampling of smaller and more technically challenging lesions including ground-glass nodules. Most recently, robotic bronchoscopy has been developed which, among other refinements, allows fine control of visual bronchoscopic navigation by replacing movements directed by the hand with electronic consoles and trackballs, and innovatively integrate virtual with real bronchoscopic pathways. The requirement for PPL diagnosis and treatment is expected to increase with more chest CT performed as part of CT screening programmes.

Predictive factors for a successful diagnostic bronchoscopy of ground-glass nodules

INTRODUCTION:

Since the National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated the utility of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer, the detection rate of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) has increased. Endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is widely performed to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions, but there are not enough reports on the predictive ability of EBUS-GS in diagnosing GGNs. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive factors for a successful diagnostic bronchoscopy for GGNs.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy for GGNs from September 2012 to January 2016 were enrolled in this study. From these, cases who underwent EBUS-GS were selected. They were reviewed and analyzed to examine the association between the diagnostic yield and the following clinical factors: lesion size, lobar position, location, consolidation-to-tumor ratio, visibility on X-ray, use of virtual bronchoscopy, bronchus sign, guide sheath size, and number of biopsies.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 254 cases, of which 167 were diagnosed using EBUS-GS (65.7% diagnostic yield). Univariate analysis indicated that a positive bronchus sign was a significant factor for higher diagnostic yield (72.9% vs. 34.0%; P < 0.001). The use of virtual bronchoscopy also tended toward a higher yield, but the result was not significant (69.0% vs. 54.4%; P = 0.058). However, multivariate analysis indicated that both were significantly associated with higher diagnostic yield (P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 5.35; P < 0.001, OR: 1.97, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that a positive bronchus sign and the use of virtual bronchoscopy are positive predictive factors for successful diagnostic bronchoscopy of GGNs.

Accuracy and consequences of same-day, invasive lung cancer workup - a retrospective study in patients treated with surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Though widely used, little is known about accuracy and efficacy of same-day, invasive workup of suspected lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of same-day, invasive lung cancer workup (diagnosis and mediastinal staging), and to identify differences between patients without (Group A) or with (Group B) need for resampling.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients referred for surgical treatment for localised lung cancer after invasive diagnostic and staging workup at our unit. Data were extracted from electronic medical files. Surgical specimens served as gold standard for correct diagnosis and stage.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (peripheral lesion: 84%; mediastinal staging: 97%) were included. After same-day, invasive workup, 71% had no need for further invasive workup (Group A), while 29% had (Group B). Group A differed significantly from Group B in fewer invasive tests, fewer days from referral to surgery, and lower pneumothorax incidence, while no differences were observed in diagnostic accuracy, cancer subtype, tumour size, tumour stage, peripheral lesion, nodal involvement, gender, or presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tumour located in right upper lobe was associated with need for resampling.

DISCUSSION

Our retrospective study suggests that same-day, invasive workup for lung cancer is safe, accurate, and efficacious in reducing time to therapy, even in patients with small lesions and low tumour burden.

Transbronchial needle aspiration in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fluoroscopy-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has long been used in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), although its diagnostic performance varies considerably.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of TBNA in the diagnosis of PPLs, comparing its diagnostic yield with transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and assessing the main predictors of a successful aspirate.In 18 studies, the overall TBNA yield was 0.53 (95% CI 0.44-0.61). TBNA showed a higher accuracy when directly compared to TBB (0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.71) versus 0.45 (95% CI 0.37-0.54)). The subgroup analyses documented a higher TBNA yield when the computed tomography (CT) bronchus sign was present (0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.77) versus 0.51 (95% CI 0.38-0.64)), when rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was performed (0.62 (95% CI 0.43-0.79) versus 0.51 (95% CI 0.42-0.60)), in the case of malignant lesions (0.55 (95% CI 0.44-0.66) versus 0.17 (95% CI 0.11-0.24)) and for lesions >3 cm (0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.87) versus 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.63)).Conventional TBNA is a useful sampling technique for the diagnosis of PPL, with a higher diagnostic yield than TBB. The presence of CT bronchus sign, an underlying malignant process, lesion size >3 cm and ROSE employment are predictors of a higher yield.

Impact of the introduction of EBUS on time to management decision, complications, and invasive modalities used to diagnose and stage lung cancer: a pragmatic pre-post study

Background

Utilisation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is gaining popularity, however, its impact on clinical practice is unclear. This study aimed to determine the impact of the introduction of endobronchial ultrasound-guided procedures (EBUS) on time to management decision for lung cancer patients, and on the utilisation of other invasive diagnostic modalities, including CT-guided trans-thoracic needle aspiration (CT-TTNA), bronchoscopy, and mediastinoscopy.

Methods

Hospital records of new primary lung cancer patients presenting in 2007 and 2008 (Pre-EBUS cohort) and in 2010 and 2011 (Post-EBUS cohort) were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

The Pre-EBUS cohort included 234 patients. Of the 326 patients in the Post-EBUS cohort, 90 had an EBUS procedure (EBUS-TBNA for 19.0 % and EBUS-GS for 10.4 % of cases). The number of CT-TTNAs and bronchoscopies decreased following the introduction of EBUS (p = 0.015 and p < 0.001 respectively). Of 162 CT-TTNAs, 59 (36 %) resulted in complications compared to 1 complication each for bronchoscopy and EBUS-GS, and no complications from EBUS-TBNA. Fewer complications occurred overall in the Post-EBUS cohort compared to the Pre-EBUS cohort (p = 0.0264). The median time to management decision was 17 days (IQR 24) for the Pre-EBUS and 13 days (IQR 21) for the Post-EBUS cohort (p = 0.07). Within the Post-EBUS cohort, median time to management decision was longer for the EBUS group (n = 90) than the Non-EBUS group (17 days (IQR 29) vs. 10 days (IQR 10), p < 0.001). For half of EBUS-TBNA patients (n = 28, 50.0 %) and EBUS-GS patients (n = 14, 50.0 %), EBUS alone provided sufficient diagnostic and/or staging information; these patients had median time to management decision of 10 days. Regression analysis revealed that the number of imaging events, inpatient, and outpatient visits were significant predictors of time to management decision of >28 days; EBUS was not a predictor of time to management decision.

Conclusions

The introduction of EBUS led to fewer CT-TTNAs and bronchoscopies and did not impact on the time to management decision. EBUS-TBNA or EBUS-GS alone provided sufficient information for diagnosis and/or regional staging in half of the lung cancer patients referred for this investigation.

Transbronchial needle aspirations vs. percutaneous needle aspirations

Over the last decade, the increasing diffusion of innovative and more powerful imaging guided techniques has further broadened the bronchoscopist's horizons in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral pulmonary nodules/masses (PPN/M). However, in most of institutions worldwide, due to the lack of resources and specific skills, the routinely diagnostic approach to PPN/M is still represented by imaging-guided transbronchial needle aspirations (TBNA) and percutaneous needle aspirations (PCNA). So far, no randomized clinical trials directly comparing the accuracy of the two procedures are available, and a standardized strategy that defines the proper role of each technique has yet to be established. In fact, the choice between these procedures is mostly influenced by "environmental" factors, such as operator's experience and local resources, rather than by an established algorithm, based on selected clinical scenarios. Data from literature indirectly suggest a higher sensitivity of PCNA compared to transbronchial approach, especially when lesions are peripheral and less than 2 cm. On the other hand, the transbronchial approach has been shown to have a better safety profile. Moreover, it offers the advantages to provide, during a single examination, a pathological diagnosis of nodules, information on mediastinal staging and airways involvement, and to identify potential synchronous lesions. In this context, it would be reasonable to firstly perform flexible bronchoscopy with TBNA, and, in case of inconclusive results, PCNA. In conclusions, both the techniques have been shown to be useful in the diagnostic pre-operative work-up of PPN/M. In order to optimize the diagnostic yield and to minimize the risk of patients they should not to be considered as two alternative options, but, rather, as two complementary techniques integrated in a standardized algorithm.

(18)F-FDG uptake predicts diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy in peripheral lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Recent advances in endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) have enabled better visualization of distal airways, while virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) has been shown useful as a guide to navigate the bronchoscope. However, indications for utilizing VBN and EBUS-GS are not always clear. To clarify indications for a bronchoscopic examination using VBN and EBUS-GS, we evaluated factors that predict the diagnostic yield of a transbronchial biopsy (TBB) procedure for peripheral lung cancer (PLC) lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 194 patients with 201 PLC lesions (≤3cm mean diameter), and analyzed the association of diagnostic yield of TBB with [(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography and chest computed tomography (CT) findings.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield of TBB using VBN and EBUS-GS was 66.7%. High maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), positive bronchus sign, and ground-glass opacity component shown on CT were all significant predictors of diagnostic yield, while multivariate analysis showed only high (18)F-FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥2.8) and positive bronchus sign as significant predictors. Diagnostic yield was higher for PLC lesions with high (18)F-FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥2.8) and positive bronchus sign (84.6%) than for those with SUVmax <2.8 and negative bronchus sign (33.3%). High (18)F-FDG uptake was also correlated with tumor invasiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

High (18)F-FDG uptake predicted the diagnostic yield of TBB using VBN and EBUS-GS for PLC lesions. (18)F-FDG uptake and bronchus sign may indicate for the accurate application of bronchoscopy with those modalities for diagnosing PLC.