Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma showing Bcl-2 expression

Diverse Immunoprofile of Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate with an Emphasis on the Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) of the prostate is an uncommon histologic subtype whose prognostic factors and immunoprofile have not been fully defined.

METHODS

To define its prognostic factors and immunoprofile, the clinicopathological features, including biochemical recurrence (BCR), of 61 cases of DAC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarray constructs to assess the expression of prostate cancer-related and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling-related proteins.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 19.3 months, BCR occurred in 26 cases (42.6%). DAC demonstrated a wide expression range of prostate cancer-related proteins, including nine cases (14.8%) that were totally negative for pan-cytokeratin (PanCK) immunostaining. The mTOR signaling-related proteins also showed diverse expression. On univariate analysis, BCR was associated with high preoperative serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), large tumor volume, predominant ductal component, high Gleason score (GS), comedo-necrosis, high tumor stage (pT), lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margin. High expressions of phospho-mTOR (p-mTOR) as well as low expressions of PSA, phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (pS6) and PanCK were associated with BCR. On multivariable analysis, GS, pT, and immunohistochemical expressions of PanCK and p-mTOR remained independent prognostic factors for BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest GS, pT, and immunohistochemical expressions of PanCK and p-mTOR as independent prognostic factors for BCR in DAC. Since DAC showed diverse expression of prostate cancer-related proteins, this should be recognized in interpreting the immunoprofile of DAC. The diverse expression of mTOR-related proteins implicates their potential utility as predictive markers for mTOR targeted therapy.

The update of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Since initially described in 1967, prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has engendered a series of controversies on its origin, histological features, and biological behavior. Owing to the improvement of molecular biological technique, there are some updated findings on the characteristics of PDA. In the current review, we will mainly analyze its origin, clinical manifestations, morphological features, differential diagnosis, immunophenotype and molecular genetics, with the purpose of enhancing recognition of this tumor and making a correct diagnosis and treatment choice.

Improved differentiation between ductal and acinar prostate cancer using three-dimensional histology and biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to refine the methodology for discriminating the ductal (DAP) and acinar adenocarcinomas (AAP) of the prostate and confirm that prostate carcinoma of ductal origin is a more aggressive subtype.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 110 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases operated on between 2000 and 2006 and worked up using large-format "two-dimensional" (2D; 4 μm thick) and "three-dimensional" (3D; 1500 μm thick) histology sections was carried out, with an average follow-up of 5.1 years. The same material was also analysed for selected biomarkers in tissue microarray blocks. The most discriminatory biomarkers were then tested on preoperative core biopsy specimens from 24 of these patients.

RESULTS

3D histology classified 97/110 (88%) cases of AAP and 13/110 (12%) DAP, which was then confirmed in 2D specimens. The DAP cases had a significantly greater frequency of pT3a and more advanced cancers, > 20 mm tumour focus, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, Gleason score ≥ 7, positive margin, extracapsular extension, vascular invasion, seminal vesicle infiltration, biochemical/local recurrence, regional lymph-node metastases and distant metastases. Three biomarkers in combination (chromogranin A, epidermal growth factor receptor and p53] distinguished DAP from AAP with an accuracy of 94% (area under the curve 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.99). The same high accuracy was achieved using these three biomarkers on the preoperative specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 3D histology and the three selected biomarkers can help in accurately distinguishing DAP from AAP. The clear-cut distinction of two forms of prostate cancers by the approach advocated in this paper would allow AAP patients to undergo less radical treatment and would segregate DAP patients into a subset requiring more effective treatment regimens.

Immunohistochemical verification of ductal differentiation in prostate cancer

Recent studies have shown that patients with prostate carcinomas exhibiting ductal differentiation have an unfavourable prognosis compared with those with purely acinar adenocarcinomas. We studied the expression of nine immunohistochemical markers to evaluate their value in delineating carcinomas with and without ductal differentiation. Thirteen tumours showing cellular characteristics and growth patterns typical of ductal differentiation were identified among 110 analysed prostatectomy specimens. The levels of cytoplasmic expression of chromogranine A (69% vs 19%, p = 0.0003) and nuclear expression of p53 (76% vs 12%, p < 0.0001) as well as nuclear expression of Ki-67 (69% vs 26%, p = 0.0047) in the tumour cells, were found to be statistically significantly different in the two tumour categories. Assessment of chromogranine A, p53 and Ki-67 in prostate carcinoma may serve as useful adjunctive diagnostic tools for delineating more aggressive prostate cancer cases exhibiting ductal differentiation.

Gene expression profiles of ductal versus acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Ductal adenocarcinoma is an uncommon variant of prostatic adenocarcinoma with a generally more aggressive clinical course than usual acinar adenocarcinoma. However, the molecular distinction between ductal and acinar adenocarcinomas is not well characterized. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the relatedness of ductal versus acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma by comparative gene expression profiling. Archived, de-identified, snap frozen tumor tissue from 5 ductal adenocarcinomas, 3 mixed ductal-acinar adenocarcinomas, and 11 acinar adenocarcinomas cases were analyzed. All cases of acinar and ductal adenocarcinomas were matched by Gleason grade. RNA from whole tissue sections of the 5 ductal and 11 acinar adenocarcinomas cases were subjected to gene expression profiling on Affymetrix U133Plus2 microarrays. Independently, laser-capture microdissection was also performed on the three mixed ductal-acinar cases and five pure acinar cases to isolate homogeneous populations of ductal and acinar carcinoma cells from the same tumor. Seven of these laser-capture microdissected samples (three ductal and four acinar cell populations) were similarly analyzed on U133Plus2 arrays. Analysis of data from whole sections of ductal and acinar carcinomas identified only 25 gene transcripts whose expression was significantly and at least two-fold different between ductal and acinar adenocarcinomas. A similar analysis of microdissected cell populations identified 10 transcripts, including the prolactin receptor, with more significant differences in expression of 5- to 27-fold between ductal and acinar adenocarcinomas cells. Overexpression of prolactin receptor protein in ductal versus acinar adenocarcinoma was confirmed by immunohistochemistry in an independent set of tumors. We conclude that ductal and acinar adenocarcinomas of the prostate are strikingly similar at the level of gene expression. However, several of the genes identified in this study, including the prolactin receptor, represent targets for further investigations on the molecular basis for histomorphological and clinical behavioral differences between acinar and ductal adenocarcinomas.

Sphingolipids and the sphingosine kinase inhibitor, SKI II, induce BCL-2-independent apoptosis in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Elevated BCL-2 is one mechanism of therapeutic resistance in prostate cancer (PC), and new approaches are needed to overcome such resistance.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of BCL-2 over-expression in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cells on their susceptibility to sphingolipids (SLs) and to the sphingosine kinase (SpK) inhibitor, SKI II.

RESULTS

In survival assays, no significant differences were observed in the responses to sphingosine or ceramide among parental PC-3 cells lacking detectable BCL-2 and BCL-2 over-expressing PC-3 transfectants; similarly, the responses to dimethyl-sphingosine (DMSP) of parental LNCaP cells and a BCL-2 over-expressing LNCaP transfectant were equivalent. SKI II induced protracted, BCL-2-independent survival loss in both PC-3 and LNCaP parental/transfectant pairs; in contrast, DMSP induced rapid cell shrinkage, caspase activation and caspase-dependent DNA fragmentation. DMSP-induced DNA fragmentation and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential were equivalent in BCL-2 transfectants and parental PC-3 cells and were not associated with BCL-2 downregulation. DMSP-mediated cytotoxicity was not associated with the enhanced production of reactive oxygen intermediates. SL analyses of parental and transfectant PC-3 cells did not reveal increased levels of sphingosine-1-phosphate in the BCL-2 transfectants; further, there only a modest early shift, corresponding to apoptotic onset, in pro- versus anti-apoptotic SLs in response to DMSP treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, in contrast to the inhibitory effects of BCL-2 on apoptosis induced by various agents in tumor cells, SKI II and selected pro-apoptotic SLs appear atypical in their independence from such inhibition, and may have merits as new candidates for treatment of AI PC.