Stepwise algorithm using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for differential diagnosis of fat-poor angiomyolipoma in small renal masses: A prospective validation study

OBJECTIVES

To validate the diagnostic accuracy of a stepwise algorithm to differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from renal cancer in small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 223 patients with solid renal masses <4 cm and no visible fat on unenhanced computed tomography (CT). Patients were assessed using an algorithm that utilized the dynamic CT and MRI findings in a stepwise manner. The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated in patients whose histology was confirmed through surgery or biopsy. The clinical course of the patients was further analyzed.

RESULTS

The algorithm classified 151 (68%)/42 (19%)/30 (13%) patients into low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, respectively. Pathological diagnosis was made for 183 patients, including 10 (5.5%) with fp-AML. Of these, 135 (74%)/36 (20%)/12 (6.6%) were classified into the low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, and each group included 1 (0.7%)/3 (8.3%)/6 (50%) fp-AMLs, respectively, leading to the area under the curve for predicting AML of 0.889. Surgery was commonly opted in the low and intermediate AML probability groups (84% and 64%, respectively) for initial management, while surveillance was selected in the high AML probability group (63%). During the 56-month follow-up, 36 (82%) of 44 patients initially surveyed, including 13 of 18 (72%), 6 of 7 (86%), and 17 of 19 (89%) in the low/intermediate/high AML probability groups, respectively, continued surveillance without any progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating fp-AMLs. These findings may help in the management of patients with SRMs.

High peripheral neutrophil and monocyte count distinguishes renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma and predicts poor prognosis of renal cell carcinoma

Background

The presence of peripheral inflammatory cells has been linked to the prognosis of cancer. This study aims to investigate the distinct roles of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and absolute monocyte count (AMC) in differentiating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from renal angiomyolipoma (RAML), as well as their prognostic significance in RCC.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of peripheral immune cell data, clinicopathological data, and tumor characteristics in patients diagnosed with RCC or RAML from January 2015 to December 2021. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, as well as univariate and multivariate analyses, were employed to assess the diagnostic utility of AMC and ANC in differentiating between RCC and RAML. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was used to study the survival of RCC patients with different AMC and ANC. The prognostic value of AMC and ANC in RCC was investigated using COX univariate and multivariate analysis. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used for bioinformatic correlation analysis.

Results

A total of 1120 eligible patients were included in the study. The mean preoperative AMC and ANC in patients with RCC were found to be significantly higher compared to those in patients with RAML (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). High preoperative AMC and ANC significantly correlated with smoking history, tumor length, gross hematuria, and high T Stage, N stage, and pathological grade. In multivariate analyses, an ANC> 3.205 *10^9/L was identified to be independently associated with the presence of RCC (HR = 1.618, P = 0.008). High AMC and ANC were significantly associated with reduced OS and PFS (P < 0.05), and ANC may be an independent prognostic factor. Public database analysis showed that signature genes of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) were highly expressed in ccRCC.

Conclusions

Elevated preoperative ANC and AMC can distinguish RCC from RAML and predict poor prognosis in patients with RCC. Furthermore, the signature genes of TAMs and TANs exhibit high expression levels in clear cell RCC.

A case of renomedullary interstitial cell tumor: Radiologic-pathologic correlation

Renomedullary interstitial cell tumor (RMICT), referred to as a medullary fibroma, is almost always asymptomatic and incidentally identified either at autopsy or upon resection of the kidney for other reasons. Although a few cases of RMICTs that are large in size and clinically symptomatic have been reported, there are few reports of RMICTs contrasting imaging findings with pathological findings. In this report, we describe a relatively large RMICT case of 3 cm in size, focusing on the radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Multiparametric MRI of Solid Renal Masses: Principles and Applications of Advanced Quantitative and Functional Methods for Tumor Diagnosis and Characterization

Solid renal masses (SRMs) are increasingly detected and encompass both benign and malignant masses, with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) being the most common malignant SRM. Most patients with SRMs will undergo management without a priori pathologic confirmation. There is an unmet need to noninvasively diagnose and characterize RCCs, as significant variability in clinical behavior is observed and a wide range of differing management options exist. Cross-sectional imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are increasingly used for SRM characterization. Multiparametric (mp) MRI techniques can provide insight into tumor biology by probing different physiologic/pathophysiologic processes noninvasively. These include sequences that probe tissue microstructure, including intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and T₁ relaxometry; oxygen metabolism (blood oxygen level dependent [BOLD-MRI]); as well as vascular flow and perfusion (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI] and arterial spin labeling [ASL]). In this review, we will discuss each mpMRI method in terms of its principles, roles, and discuss the results of human studies for SRM assessment. Future validation of these methods may help to enable a personalized management approach for patients with SRM in the emerging era of precision medicine. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 2.

MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma With Minimal Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

Objectives

Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are different to distinguish minimal fat angiomyolipoma (mf-AML) with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics in the differentiation of fat-poor AMLs from other renal neoplasms.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with solid renal tumors without macroscopic fat and with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC (n=50) or mf-AML (n=19) who underwent conventional MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) were included. Clinical data including age, sex, tumor location, urine creatinine, and urea nitrogen were collected from medical records. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured from renal tumors. We used the ITK-SNAP software to manually delineate the regions of interest on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and IVIM-DWI from the largest cross-sectional area of the tumor. We extracted 396 radiomics features by the Analysis Kit software for each MR sequence. The hand-crafted features were selected by using the Pearson correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared between the models to obtain the optimal model for the differentiation of mf-AML and RCC. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the models.

Results

Clinical model based on urine creatinine achieved an AUC of 0.802 (95%CI: 0.761-0.843). IVIM-based model based on f value achieved an AUC of 0.692 (95%CI: 0.627-0.757). T2WI-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.883 (95%CI: 0.852-0.914). IVIM-radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.874 (95%CI: 0.841-0.907). Combined radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.919 (95%CI: 0.894-0.944). Clinical-radiomics model yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.931 (95%CI: 0.907-0.955). The calibration curve and DCA confirmed that the clinical-radiomics model had a good consistency and clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The clinical-radiomics model may be served as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to differentiate mf-AML with RCC, which might facilitate the clinical decision-making process.

Utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: model development and external validation

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of radiomics features of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional study included two cohorts with pathologically confirmed renal tumors: 65 patients with ccRCC and 18 with fpAML in the model development cohort, and 17 with ccRCC and 13 with fpAML in the external validation cohort. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including DW-MRI. Radiomics analysis was used to extract 39 imaging features from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. The radiomics features were analyzed with unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. A random forest (RF) model was used to identify radiomics features important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC in the development cohort. The diagnostic performance of the RF model was evaluated in the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The cases in the developmental cohort were classified into three groups with different frequencies of fpAML by cluster analysis of radiomics features. RF analysis of the development cohort showed that the mean ADC value was important for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC, as well as higher-texture features including gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM)_long-run low gray-level enhancement (LRLGE), and GLRLM_low gray-level run emphasis (LGRE). The area under the curve values of the development [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.00] and validation cohorts (0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.00) were similar (P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics features of ADC maps are useful for differentiating fpAML from ccRCC.

MR texture analysis in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess the utility of magnetic resonance texture analysis (MRTA) in differentiating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma (lpAML) and oncocytoma.

METHODS

After ethical approval, 42 patients with 54 masses (34 RCC, 14 lpAML and six oncocytomas) who underwent MRI on a 1.5 T scanner (Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) between January 2011 and December 2012 were retrospectively included in the study. MRTA was performed on the TexRAD research software (Feedback Plc., Cambridge, UK) using free-hand polygonal region of interest (ROI) drawn on the maximum cross-sectional area of the tumor to generate six first-order statistical parameters. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to look for any statically significant difference. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to select the parameter with the highest class separation capacity [area under the curve (AUC)] for each MRI sequence.

RESULTS

Several texture parameters on MRI showed high-class separation capacity (AUC > 0.8) in differentiating RCC from lpAML and oncocytoma. The best performing parameter in differentiating RCC from lpAML was mean of positive pixels (MPP) at SSF 2 (AUC: 0.891) on DWI b500. In differentiating RCC from oncocytoma, the best parameter was mean at SSF 0 (AUC: 0.935) on DWI b1000.

CONCLUSIONS

MRTA could potentially serve as a useful non-invasive tool for differentiating RCC from lpAML and oncocytoma.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

There is limited literature addressing the role of MRTA in differentiating RCC from lpAML and oncocytoma. Our study demonstrated several texture parameters which were useful in this regard.

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: Incidence in a Japanese cohort and diagnostic utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

To show the epidemiological characteristics of epithelioid angiomyolipoma in a Japanese population, and to establish the preoperative diagnosis method of epithelioid angiomyolipoma.

METHODS

Among the 855 tumors of patients who underwent partial/radical nephrectomy or renal biopsy for presumed renal cell carcinoma between 2007 and 2018, 39 renal tumors were diagnosed as nonclassical angiomyolipoma, including epithelioid angiomyolipoma and fat-poor angiomyolipoma. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Furthermore, we analyzed computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging results, including diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging findings of epithelioid angiomyolipoma and fat-poor angiomyolipoma.

RESULTS

The incidence of epithelioid angiomyolipoma (n = 7) was 17.9% of surgically resected non-classical angiomyolipoma. The radiological appearance of epithelioid angiomyolipoma was hyperattenuating on unenhanced computed tomography images with iso or low intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value of the solid component in epithelioid angiomyolipoma was significantly lower than that in fat-poor angiomyolipoma (median 0.79 × 10^-3 vs 1.07 × 10^-3 mm² /s, P = 0.0019).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of epithelioid angiomyolipoma in our Japanese cohort was equivalent to that of the reported series in the USA. The apparent diffusion coefficient value is potentially useful to differentiate between epithelioid angiomyolipoma and fat-poor angiomyolipoma. Further research is required to establish the imaging diagnostic criteria for epithelioid angiomyolipoma.

Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of renal tumor subtypes and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiation of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal tumor types.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published until May 1, 2019, that reported ADC values of renal tumors. Methodological quality was evaluated. For the meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy of ADC for differentiation of ccRCC from other renal lesions, we applied a bivariate random-effects model and compared two subgroups of ADC measurement with vs. without cystic and necrotic areas.

RESULTS

We included 48 studies (2588 lesions) in the systematic review and 13 studies (1126 lesions) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in ADC of renal parenchyma using b values of 0-800 vs. 0-1000 (p = 0.08). ADC measured on selected portions (sADC) excluding cystic and necrotic areas differed significantly from whole-lesion ADC (wADC) (p = 0.002). Compared to ccRCC, minimal-fat angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC showed significantly lower sADC while oncocytoma exhibited higher sADC. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate ccRCC from other tumors were 80% (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and 78% (95% CI, 0.64-0.89), respectively, for sADC and 77% (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and 77% (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) for wADC. sADC offered a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than wADC (0.852 vs. 0.785, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values of kidney tumors that exclude cystic or necrotic areas more accurately differentiate ccRCC from other renal tumor types than whole-lesion ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Selective ADC of renal tumors, excluding cystic and necrotic areas, provides better discriminatory ability than whole-lesion ADC to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.852 vs. 0.785, respectively (p = 0.02). • Selective ADC of renal masses provides moderate sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 78%, respectively, for differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. • Selective ADC excluding cystic and necrotic areas are preferable to whole-lesion ADC as an additional tool to multiphasic MRI to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions whether the highest b value is 800 or 1000.

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors.

METHODS

Multiple b value DWIs and DKIs were performed in 180 patients with renal tumors, which were divided into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), non-ccRCC, and benign renal tumor group. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters for predicting malignant renal tumors was compared.

RESULTS

The ADC, D, and MD values of ccRCCs were higher, while D*, f, and MK values were lower than those of benign renal tumors (all p < 0.025). The D* and f values of non-ccRCCs were lower than those of benign renal tumors (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The difference of ADC, D, MD, and MK values between non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The ADC, D, MD, and f values of ccRCCs were higher, while MK values were lower than those of non-ccRCCs (all p < 0.001). The AUC values of ADC, D, D*, f, MK, and MD were 0.849, 0.891, 0.708, 0.656, 0.862, and 0.838 for differentiating ccRCCs from benign renal tumors, respectively. The AUC values of D* and f were 0.772 and 0.866 for discrimination between non-ccRCCs and benign renal tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

IVIM parameters are the best, while DWI and DKI parameters have similar performance in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.

KEY POINTS

• The D value is the best parameter for differentiating ccRCC from benign renal tumors. • The f value is the best parameter for differentiating non-ccRCC from benign renal tumors. • Conventional DWI and DKI have similar performance in differentiating malignant and benign renal tumors.

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Differentiation of Minimal Fat Angiomyolipoma from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic value of whole-tumor quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram and texture analysis for differentiation of minimal fat angiomyolipoma (MFAML) from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients with MFAML and 113 patients with ccRCC pathologically proven. All patients performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 0, 800s/mm²). Whole-tumor regions of interest were drawn on all slices of diffusion-weighted imaging to obtain histogram and texture parameters, including the mean ADC, median ADC, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th percentiles ADC, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy. The Student's t test was used to compare the parameters between MFAML and ccRCC. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was used to compare the diagnostic value of each significant parameter.

RESULTS

MFAML had significantly lower mean ADC, median ADC, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th percentiles ADC than ccRCC (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Skewness of MFAML was significantly higher than that of ccRCC (p = 0.016). However, standard deviation, kurtosis, and entropy were not significantly different (p = 0.409, p = 0.085, p = 0.206, respectively). The 90th percentile ADC generated the highest AUC (AUC, 0.854; Sensitivity, 78.8%; Specificity, 81.5%) for differentiating MFAML from ccRCC.

CONCLUSION

Whole-tumor ADC histogram and texture analysis could be considered a useful and noninvasive method to help differentiate MFAML of ccRCC with higher accuracy.

Renal Angiomyolipoma Based on New Classification: How to Differentiate It From Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe useful imaging features for differentiating angiomyolipoma (AML) subtypes from renal cell carcinoma subtypes.

CONCLUSION

A newer radiologic classification of renal AML consists of fat-rich AML (≤ -10 HU), fat-poor AML (> -10 HU; tumor-to-spleen ratio < 0.71; signal intensity index, > 16.5%), and fat-invisible AML (> -10 HU; tumor-to-spleen ratio, > 0.71; signal intensity index, < 16.5%). Each subtype must be differentiated from the renal cell carcinoma subtype because of overlapping imaging features.

High signal renal tumors on DWI: the diagnostic value of morphological characteristics

PURPOSE

To assess the usefulness of morphological characteristics of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant renal tumors from benign renal tumors, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from non-clear cell RCC at 3.0 T.

METHODS

The study included 249 patients with 251 histopathologically confirmed renal tumors that showed high signal on DWI. For each tumor, two radiologists independently evaluated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and morphological characteristics of DWI. The differences in the quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features determined by the readers were assessed. The ADC values between malignant and benign renal tumors and between clear cell and non-clear cell RCC were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. The proportional differences of morphological characteristics of DWI between malignant and benign renal tumors and between clear cell and non-clear cell RCC were compared using Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the quantitative and qualitative MRI features determined by the readers. The ADC values for malignant renal tumors were statistically significantly higher than those for benign renal tumors (p < 0.05), and the ADC values for clear cell RCC were statistically significantly higher than those for non-clear cell RCC (p < 0.05). The proportion of morphological characteristics of DWI between malignant and benign renal tumors was statistically significantly different at ring, nodular, flaky high signal. The proportion of morphological characteristics of DWI between clear cell and non-clear cell RCC was statistically significantly different at uniform high signal.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphological characteristics of DWI are useful in differentiating renal tumors.

Diagnostic Imaging for Solid Renal Tumors: A Pictorial Review

The prognosis of renal tumors depends on histologic subtype. The increased use of abdominal imaging has resulted in an increase in the number of small renal incidentaloma in recent decades. Of these incidentally discovered tumors, 20% are benign lesions warranting conservative management, but most are renal cell carcinomas that warrant a more aggressive therapeutic approach due to their malignant potential. Dedicated diagnostic renal imaging is important for characterization of renal tumors to facilitate treatment planning. This review discusses the ability to detect and differentiate renal cell carcinoma subtypes, angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma based on ultrasound imaging, computed tomography, multiparametric magnetic resonance, and nuclear imaging.

Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the utility of volumetric histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from reduced-FOV DWI for small (≤ 4 cm) solid renal mass subtypes at 3-T MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 38 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 16 papillary RCCs, 18 chromophobe RCCs, 13 minimal fat angiomyolipomas (AMLs), and seven oncocytomas evaluated with preoperative MRI. Volumetric ADC maps were generated using all slices of the reduced-FOV DW images to obtain histogram parameters, including mean, median, 10th percentile, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, 90th percentile, and SD ADC values, as well as skewness, kurtosis, and entropy. Comparisons of these parameters were made by one-way ANOVA, t test, and ROC curves analysis.

RESULTS

ADC histogram parameters differentiated eight of 10 pairs of renal tumors. Three subtype pairs (clear cell RCC vs papillary RCC, clear cell RCC vs chromophobe RCC, and clear cell RCC vs minimal fat AML) were differentiated by mean ADC. However, five other subtype pairs (clear cell RCC vs oncocytoma, papillary RCC vs minimal fat AML, papillary RCC vs oncocytoma, chromophobe RCC vs minimal fat AML, and chromophobe RCC vs oncocytoma) were differentiated by histogram distribution parameters exclusively (all p < 0.05). Mean ADC, median ADC, 75th and 90th percentile ADC, SD ADC, and entropy of malignant tumors were significantly higher than those of benign tumors (all p < 0.05). Combination of mean ADC with histogram parameters yielded the highest AUC (0.851; sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 86.1%).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative volumetric ADC histogram analysis may help differentiate various subtypes of small solid renal tumors, including benign and malignant lesions.

Comparison of MDCT, MRI and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of focal renal lesions: The defender, challenger, and winner!

Purpose:

To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the characterization of focal renal lesions. We also compared MDCT and MRI in the staging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and twenty adult patients underwent MDCT (40-row and 128-row scanners), MRI (at 1.5 T), and DWI (at b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm²) for characterization of 225 renal lesions. There were 65 malignant neoplasms (44 RCCs), 25 benign neoplasms, 25 abscesses, 45 pseudotumors, 15 hemorrhagic cysts, and 50 benign cysts. A composite gold standard including histology, typical imaging criteria, and follow-up imaging was employed. To determine the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities, area-under-curve (AUC) was calculated by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis and compared. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies and confidence levels with MDCT, MRI, and MRI + DWI. Cross-tabulation was used to assess the precision of MDCT and MRI in RCC staging.

Results:

AUC for MDCT (0.834) and MRI (0.841) in the classification of benign and malignant lesions were within corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) (P = 0.88) whereas MRI + DWI had significantly better performance (AUC 0.968, P = 0.0002 and 0.0004, respectively). Both CT and MRI had low specificity (66.9% and 68.8%, respectively), which increased substantially with DWI (93.8%) owing to correct diagnosis of pseudotumors. MRI was superior to CT in diagnosing necrotic RCC and hemorrhagic cysts. MRI + DWI had the highest accuracy (94.2%) in assigning the definitive diagnosis and 97.6% lesions were diagnosed with very high confidence, significantly better than CT and MRI. Both CT and MRI had the same accuracy (86.1%) in RCC staging and evaluation of intravascular thrombi.

Conclusions:

Characterization of renal lesions was most accurate with MRI + DWI. The latter is also the most suitable modality in diagnosing pseudotumors and evaluating patients with renal dysfunction. CT and MRI were equivalent in RCC staging.

Pancreatic tumors in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis complex

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are not included in the diagnostic criteria for tuberous sclerosis complex, although an association has been described.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis complex and define MRI characteristics of the tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the abdominal MRI scans of 55 children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis complex for the presence of a pancreatic mass. The scans were performed over a period of 7 years to monitor renal pathology. We obtained each patient's clinical history and treatment protocol from the hospital's electronic medical records.

RESULTS

A solid pancreatic mass was identified in 5/55 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3-20%) patients (4 male) with a mean age of 12.6 years. Four of the lesions were located in the pancreatic tail and one in the pancreatic body. All of the lesions were solid, ovoid and well demarcated, with a mean diameter of 3.1 cm. The masses uniformly demonstrated T1 and T2 prolongation, but their diffusion behavior and post-contrast enhancement varied. The two surgically resected lesions were synaptophysin (+) non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on pathology. Two of the patients who did not have surgery were treated with everolimus; one of the lesions has shown interval decrease in size and the other has remained stable.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic tumor is relatively common in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis complex.

Diffusion-Weighted Genitourinary Imaging

This review article aims to provide an overview on of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MR imaging) in the urogenital tract. Compared with conventional cross-sectional imaging methods, the additional value of DW-MR imaging in the detection and further characterization of benign and malignant lesions of the kidneys, bladder, prostate, and pelvic lymph nodes is discussed as well as the role of DW-MR imaging in the evaluation of treatment response.

Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma

PURPOSE

To determine the utility of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models in differentiating between minimal fat angiomyolipoma (MFAML) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-one patients with pathologically confirmed MFAML (n = 27) or ccRCC (n = 104) underwent multi-b value DWI (0∼1700 s/mm² ) imaging at 3.0 Tesla MRI. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a monoexponential model. A pseudo-ADC (D_p ), true ADC (D_t ), and perfusion fraction (f_p ) were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α) and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. All parameters were compared between MFAML and ccRCC by using the Student's t test. Receiver operating characteristic and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis were used for statistical evaluations.

RESULTS

ADC, D_t , and α values were significantly lower in the MFAML group than in the ccRCC group (P < 0.001). D_p , f_p , and DDC values were slightly higher in the MFAML group than in the ccRCC group; however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.136, 0.090, and 0.424, respectively). The AUC values for both α (0.953) and D_t (0.964) were significantly higher than those for ADC (0860), D_p (0.605), f_p (0.596), and DDC (0.477) in the differentiation of MFAML from ccRCC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α) and D_t may provide additional information and could lead to improved differentiation with better sensitivity and specificity between MFAML and ccRCC compared with conventional diffusion parameters.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:240-247.

Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the utility of multiparametric MRI in differentiating minimal-fat angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in small renal tumors with predominantly low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with pathologically identified renal tumors (1-4 cm) with predominantly low signal intensity on T2-weighted images without visible fat on unenhanced CT images were enrolled. Clinical and MRI variables (tumor-to-renal cortex signal intensity [SI] ratio on T2-weighted images [T2 ratio], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], and SI index) on chemical-shift images were evaluated.

RESULTS

The ADC was significantly lower in RCC than in minimal-fat AML (p = 0.001). The T2 ratio and signal intensity index were not significantly different between RCC (p = 0.31) and minimal-fat AML (p = 0.74). Multivariate analysis showed that ADC (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; p = 0.02) and male sex (OR, 46.7; p < 0.001) were the independent predictors of RCC. For differentiating minimal-fat AML from RCC, the ROC AUC of ADC was 0.781. When ADC and sex were combined, the AUC significantly increased to 0.937 with a cutoff value of 1.129 × 10^-3 mm²/s. For making the diagnosis of minimal-fat AML if the ADC was greater than the threshold, sensitivity was 89.7% and specificity was 88.2% (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In small renal tumors with predominantly low SI on T2-weighted images, ADC is useful for differentiating minimal-fat AML from RCC. Combining ADC with male sex increases the accuracy of RCC prediction.

Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in distinguishing between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and fat poor angiomyolipoma (AML).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-three patients with pathologically confirmed renal tumors were included in the study. All patients underwent renal 1.5T MRI, including IVIM protocol with 8 b values (0-800 s/mm²). The ADC, diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D^*), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. One-way ANOVA was used for comparing ADC and IVIM-derived parameters among clear cell RCC (ccRCC), non-ccRCC and fat poor AML. The diagnostic performance of these parameters was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

The ADC were significantly greater in ccRCCs than that of non-ccRCCs and fat poor AMLs (each p < 0.010, respectively). The D and D^* among the three groups were significantly different (all p < 0.050). The f of non-ccRCCs were less than that of ccRCCs and fat poor AMLs (each p < 0.050, respectively). In ROC analysis, ADC and D showed similar area under the ROC curve (AUC) values (AUC = 0.955 and 0.964, respectively, p = 0.589) in distinguishing between ccRCCs and fat poor AMLs. The combination of D > 0.97 × 10^-3 mm²/s, D^* < 28.03 × 10^-3 mm²/s, and f < 13.61% maximized the diagnostic sensitivity for distinguishing non-ccRCCs from fat poor AMLs. The final estimates of AUC (95% confidence interval), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for the entire cohort were 0.875 (0.719-0.962), 100% (23/23), 75% (9/12), 88.5% (23/26), 100% (9/9), and 91.4% (32/35), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ADC and D showed similar diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between ccRCCs and fat poor AMLs. The IVIM-derived parameters were better than ADC in discriminating non-ccRCCs from fat poor AMLs.

Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating human renal lesions (benignity or malignancy): a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for differentiating malignant and benign human renal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature was performed to identify previous research related to the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI for determining whether human renal lesions were benign or malignant. ADC values were extracted from normal renal tissue and different lesion types. Data were extracted to assess the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI for differentiating malignant and benign human renal lesions, as well as running threshold effect and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Nine publications with 11 subsets were eligible for data extraction and diagnostic performance calculation. A total of 988 apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements were included. The differences in ADC values between benign lesions (2.47 ± 0.81 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and malignant lesions (1.81 ± 0.41 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The diagnostic odds ratio, the overall positive, negative likelihood ratios, pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% CI were 20.05 (95% CI 12.56-32.02), 3.32 (95% CI 2.13-5.18), 0.20 (95% CI 0.15-0.27), 88% (95% CI 0.84-0.91) and 72% (95% CI 0.67-0.76), respectively. The area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic was 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that DW-MRI had a relatively good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign human renal lesions. We preliminarily recommend that DW-MRI is performed with a maximum b value ranging from 800 to 1000 s/mm(2) at 3.0 T for imaging protocol, and that DW-MRI should be used with caution when the study population includes children.

Clinical applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of renal lesions - a systematic review

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is an established technique to detect the changes of the diffusion of water in biological tissues and reflect the pathophysiological process on the molecular level. It is a promising non-invasive imaging modality in detection of microstructural and functional changes in pathologies of kidney. To systematically review the research advancement of the DW-MRI in diagnosis of renal lesions, a systematic literature search was performed up to 8 October 2014 using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases for articles reporting on DW-MRI in diagnosis of renal lesions. Only articles with full data about DW-MRI application with potential implication in solving usually encountered clinical challenges about renal lesions were finally examined. The clinical application of DW-MRI allows a better understanding of some pathologic conditions of the kidney including renal insufficiency, renal artery stenosis, ureteral obstruction, foetal kidney disease, hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis. In addition, DW-MRI can also provide clinicians with the information of function evaluation of renal allograft and curative effect assessment of renal tumour. In summary, performance of renal DW-MRI, presuming that measurements are high quality, will further boost this modality, particularly for early detection of diffusion renal conditions, as well as more accurate characterization of renal lesions.

[Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys]

Interest in functional renal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has significantly increased in recent years. This review article provides an overview of the most important functional imaging techniques and their potential clinical applications for assessment of native and transplanted kidneys, with special emphasis on the clarification of renal tumors.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Renal Cell Carcinoma

As the most common neoplasm arising from the kidney, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to have a significant impact on global health. Conventional cross-sectional imaging has always served an important role in the staging of RCC. However, with recent advances in imaging techniques and postprocessing analysis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) now has the capability to function as a diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic biomarker for RCC. For this narrative literature review, a PubMed search was conducted to collect the most relevant and impactful studies from our perspectives as urologic oncologists, radiologists, and computational imaging specialists. We seek to cover advanced MR imaging and image analysis techniques that may improve the management of patients with small renal mass or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Small Solid Renal Tumors (≤ 4 cm) at 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement obtained with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to distinguish renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) from small benign solid renal tumors (≤ 4 cm).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 49 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed small solid renal tumors, and seven healthy volunteers were imaged using nonenhanced MRI and DW-MRI. The ADC map was calculated using the b values of 0, 50, 400, and 600 s/mm 2 and values compared via the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. The utility of ADC for differentiating RCCs and benign lesions was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Multiple nonenhanced MRI features were analyzed by Logistic regression.

RESULTS

The tumors consisted of 33 cases of clear-cell RCCs (ccRCCs) and 16 cases of benign tumors, including 14 cases of minimal fat angiomyolipomas and 2 cases of oncocytomas. The ADCs showed significant differences among benign tumors ([0.90 ± 0.52] × 10-3 mm 2 /s), ccRCCs ([1.53 ± 0.31] × 10-3 mm 2 /s) and the normal renal parenchyma ([2.22 ± 0.12] × 10-3 mm 2 /s) (P < 0.001). Moreover, there was statistically significant difference between high and low-grade ccRCCs (P = 0.004). Using a cut-off ADC of 1.36 × 10-3 mm 2 /s, DW-MRI resulted in an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity equal to 0.839, 75.8%, and 87.5%, respectively. Nonenhanced MRI alone and the combination of imaging methods led to an AUC, sensitivity and specificity equal to 0.919, 93.9%, and 81.2%, 0.998, 97%, and 100%, respectively. The Logistic regression showed that the location of the center of the tumor (inside the contour of the kidney) and appearance of stiff blood vessel were significantly helpful for diagnosing ccRCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

DW-MRI has potential in distinguishing ccRCCs from benign lesions in human small solid renal tumors (≤ 4 cm), and in increasing the accuracy for diagnosing ccRCCs when combined with nonenhanced MRI.

Angiomyolipoma (AML) without visible fat: Ultrasound, CT and MR imaging features with pathological correlation

OBJECTIVE

To compare imaging findings with histopathology in AML without visible fat (AMLwvf).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

With IRB approval, we identified 18 AMLwvf that underwent CT between 2002-2014. A radiologist measured NECT-attenuation, corticomedullary (CM) and nephrographic (NG) enhancement, echogenicity relative to renal cortex (RC) (N = 5), T2W (T2AML/T2RC) signal-intensity (SI), and chemical-shift SI ([SIIN-PHASE - SIOPPOSED-PHASE]/SIIN-PHASE) indices (N = 6). A pathologist re-evaluated 15/18 AMLwvf for 1) < or > 25% adipocytes/high-power-field (HPF), 2) "many or few" blood vessels. Comparisons were performed using chi-square and independent t-tests.

RESULTS

73.3%(11/15) of AMLwvf had <25% adipocytes/HPF and 86.7%(13/15) had "many" blood vessels. NECT-attenuation was 41.8(±6.9) HU. 61.1 %(11/18) of AMLwvf were hyper-attenuating and 38.9%(7/18) iso-attenuating; attenuation was associated with %-adipocytes/HPF, (p = 0.01). CM/NG enhancement were 63.3(±20.8)/51.7(±15.5) HU. 72.2%(13/18) of AMLwvf had wash-out enhancement, with no association with amount of blood vessels at pathology, (p = 0.68). No difference in echogenicity was noted by histology (p > 0.05). All AMLwvf were T2-hypointense (SI ratio = 0.61 [±0.1]). 2/6 AMLwvf showed SI drop on chemical-shift MRI; both were iso-attenuating and were associated with >25% adipocytes/HPF (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

AMLwvf are typically T2-hypointense and hyper-attenuating with wash-out enhancement due to abundant smooth muscle and vessels respectively. Iso-attenuating AMLwvf with microscopic fat on MRI contain more adipocytes/HPF.

KEY POINTS

• Five percent of AML do not demonstrate detectable fat on imaging • These AML are hyperattenuating and T2-hypointense due to abundant smooth muscle • These AML show washout enhancement without association to vessel count at histopathology • Iso-attenuating AML with microscopic fat on MRI show >25% adipocytes/HPF • The term "AML without visible fat" is proposed to reduce ambiguity.

Diagnostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Renal Cancer

Background. This study aimed to investigate whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could contribute to the discrimination between benign and malignant renal cancer. Methods. We searched the PubMed electronic database for eligible studies. STATA 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The SMD and 95% CI were calculated. Results. Decreased ADC signal was seen in all renal cancer patients (cancer tissue versus normal tissue: SMD = 1.63 and 95% CI = 0.96~2.29, P < 0.001; cancer tissue versus benign tissue: SMD = 2.22 and 95% CI = 1.53~2.90 and P < 0.001, resp.). MRI machine type-stratified analysis showed that decreased ADC signal was found by all included MRI machine types in cancer tissues compared with benign cancer tissues (all P < 0.05). The ADC values of renal cancer patients were significantly lower than those of normal controls for all included P values (all P < 0.05), and there was a decreased ADC signal at b-500, b-600, b-1000, b-500, and 1000 gradients compared with benign cancer tissues (all P < 0.05). Conclusion. Our study concluded that decreased ADC signal presented in DWI may be essential for the differential diagnosis of renal cancer.

Hepatic angiomyolipoma with special attention to radiologic imaging

Background

Angiomyolipoma is a unique mesenchymal neoplasm composed of blood vessels as well as smooth muscle and adipose cells. The liver is a less common site of origin, and hepatic angiomyolipoma is often an incidental finding on diagnostic imaging or is identified on evaluation of nonspecific symptoms.

Case presentation

We experienced four patients who were diagnosed histologically with hepatic angiomyolipoma. The preoperative diagnoses were angiomyolipoma in two patients, hepatocellular carcinoma in one, and cavernous hemangioma in one. Three patients were treated with hepatectomy (one laparoscopic and two open approaches), and the diagnosis was completed by histological investigation of the resected specimen. The remaining one was diagnosed from tumor needle biopsy. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respiratory triggering using b values of 0 and 800 s/mm² was employed. An apparent diffusion coefficient map was generated from b values of 0 and 800 s/mm² for calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient. The apparent diffusion coefficient values were calculated as 3.66, 1.21, 1.80, and 0.91 in patients 1 to 4, respectively. In MRI imaging, fat component was clearly demonstrated with chemical shift imaging in three patients. Early venous return was detected in three patients with computed tomography angiography.

Conclusion

Fat component and early venous return are important for a correct diagnosis of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Unfortunately, apparent diffusion coefficient values in hepatic angiomyolipoma were overlapping with those in other benign and malignant tumors.

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a useful tool in differentiating renal tumors

BACKGROUND

To determine the clinical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating renal tumors.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched using combinations of keywords and free words relating to renal tumor, ADC and DW-MRI. Based on carefully selected inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant case-control studies were identified and the related clinical data was acquired. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College station, TX).

RESULTS

Sixteen case-control studies were ultimately included in the present meta-analysis. These 16 high quality studies contained a combined total of 438 normal renal tissues and 832 renal tumor lesions (597 malignant and 235 benign). The results revealed that ADC values of malignant renal tumor tissues were markedly lower than normal renal tissues and benign renal tumor tissues. ADC values of benign renal tumor tissues were also significantly lower than normal renal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC measurement by DW-MRI provided clinically useful information on the internal structure of renal tumors and could be an important radiographic index for differentiation of malignant renal tumors from benign renal tumors.

Imaging findings of common benign renal tumors in the era of small renal masses: differential diagnosis from small renal cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives

The prevalence of small renal masses (SRM) has risen, paralleling the increased usage of cross-sectional imaging. A large proportion of these SRMs are not malignant, and do not require invasive treatment such as nephrectomy. Therefore, differentation between early renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign SRM is critical to achieve proper management. This article reviews the radiological features of benign SRMs, with focus on two of the most common benign entities, angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma, in terms of their common imaging findings and differential features from RCC. Furthermore, the role of percutaneous biopsy is discussed as imaging is yet imperfect, therefore necessitating biopsy in certain circumstances to confirm the benignity of SRMs.

Ten uncommon and unusual variants of renal angiomyolipoma (AML): radiologic-pathologic correlation

Classic (triphasic) renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is currently classified as a neoplasm of perivascular epithelioid cells. For diagnosis of AML, the use of thin-section non-contrast enhanced CT (NECT) improves diagnostic accuracy; however, identifying gross fat within a very small AML is challenging and often better performed with chemical-shift MRI. Although the presence of gross intra-tumoural fat is essentially diagnostic of AML; co-existing intra-tumoural fat and calcification may represent renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Differentiating AML from retroperitoneal sarcoma can be difficult when AML is large; the feeding vessel and claw signs are suggestive imaging findings. AML can haemorrhage, with intra-tumoural aneurysm size >5 mm a more specific predictor of future haemorrhage than tumor size >4 cm. Diagnosis of AML in the setting of acute haemorrhage is complex; comparison studies or follow-up imaging may be required. Not all AML contain gross fat and imaging features of AML without visible fat overlap with RCC; however, homogeneity, hyperdensity at NECT, low T2-weighted signal intensity and, microscopic fat are suggestive features. Patients with tuberous sclerosis often demonstrate a combination of classic and minimal fat AML, but are also at a slightly increased risk for RCC and should be imaged cautiously. Several rare pathological variants of AML exist including AML with epithelial cysts and epithelioid AML, which have distinct imaging characteristics. Classic AML, although benign, can be locally invasive and the rare epithelioid AML can be frankly malignant. The purpose of this review is to highlight the imaging manifestations of 10 uncommon and unusual variants of AML using pathological correlation.

[Two cases of epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney]

Two cases of epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney are reported. A 62-year-old female with incidental left renal tumor underwent laparoscopic leftpartial nephrectomy under a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. A pathological examination revealed epithelioid angiomyolipoma. The second case was that of a 35-year-old female with back pain. A laparoscopic right nephrectomy revealed epithelioid angiomyolipoma. This recently identified variant of angiomyolipoma is sometimes associated with aggressive clinical behavior including local recurrence and metastasis.

Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?

OBJECTIVE

This study was an attempt to identify key CT features that can potentially be used to differentiate between lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an analysis of patients who received nephrectomy or renal biopsy from 2002 to 2011 with suspected RCC. We included tumors smaller than 7 cm with a completed three-phase CT examination. A radiologist and a urology fellow, blinded to histopathologic diagnosis, recorded the imaging findings by consensus and compared the values for each parameter between lipid-poor angiomyolipoma, RCC subtypes, and RCC as a group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for each univariate significant feature.

RESULTS

The sample in our study consisted of 132 patients with 135 renal tumors, including 51 men (age range, 26-84 years; mean age, 57 years) and 81 women (age range, 29-91 years; mean age, 57 years). These tumors included 33 lipid-poor angiomyolipomas, 54 clear-cell RCC, 31 chromophobe RCC, and 17 papillary RCC. Multivariate analysis revealed four significant parameters for differentiating RCC as a group from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma (angular interface, p = 0.023; hypodense rim, p = 0.045; homogeneity, p = 0.005; unenhanced attenuation > 38.5 HU, p < 0.001), five for clear-cell RCC, two for chromophobe RCC, and one for papillary RCC. Lipid-poor angiomyolipoma and clear-cell RCC showed early strong enhancement and a washout pattern, whereas chromophobe RCC and papillary RCC showed gradual enhancement over time.

CONCLUSION

Specific CT features can potentially be used to differentiate lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced MRI can only distinguish to a limited extent between malignant and benign focal renal lesions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to review renal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for different renal lesions that can be applied in clinical practice.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to identify relevant articles published 2004-2011 on renal DWI of focal renal lesions. ADC values were extracted by lesion type to determine whether benign or malignant. The data table was finalised in a consensus read. ADC values were evaluated statistically using meta-regression based on a linear mixed model. Two-sided P value <5 % indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis is based on 17 studies with 764 patients. Renal cell carcinomas have significant lower ADC values than benign tissue (1.61 ± 0.08 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s vs 2.10 ± 0.09 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P < 0.0001). Uroepithelial malignancies can be differentiated by lowest ADC values (1.30 ± 0.11 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). There is a significant difference between ADC values of renal cell carcinomas and oncocytomas (1.61 ± 0.08 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s vs 2.00 ± 0.08 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of ADC values can help to determine between benign and malignant lesions in general but also seems able to differentiate oncocytomas from malignant tumours, hence potentially reducing the number of unnecessarily performed nephrectomies.

KEY POINTS

• This meta-analysis assesses the role of diffusion-weighted MRI in renal lesions. • ADC values obtained by DW MRI have been compared for different renal lesions. • ADC values can help distinguish between benign and malignant tumours. • Differentiating oncocytomas from malignant tumours can potentially reduce inappropriate nephrectomies.