Investigating four 'myths' surrounding dysphagia in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. A multi-institutional study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

A phase II study of capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (FP) remains the mostly used regimen for metastatic esophageal squamous carcinoma. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) as a first-line chemotherapy in a homogenous cohort of patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received 60 mg/m(2) of cisplatin intravenously (IV) on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/dose orally twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until the documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient's refusal. Immunohistochemical studies against thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) were performed to seek predictive markers for treatment response.

RESULTS

Between December 2003 and March 2006, 45 patients entered the study. All patients had histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The overall response rate (ORR) was 57.8% (95% CI, 43.3-72.2) with 0 CR and 26 PRs. The median duration of response in responders was 4.6 months (1.0-15.6 months). With a median follow-up duration of 25.7 months (10.8-42.6 months), the median time to progression was 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.0) and the median survival time was 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.5-13.9). Common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events were anorexia (18/191, 9.4%), fatigue (9/191, 4.7%), constipation (6/191, 3.1%), hand-foot syndrome (6/191, 3.1%) and diarrhea (4/191, 2.1%). The most common grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (33/191, 17.3%), followed by leucopenia (11/191, 5.8%), anemia (2/191, 1.0%) and thrombocytopenia (1/191, 0.5%). There was no treatment-related death. Neither TS nor TP showed predictive value for treatment response.

CONCLUSION

The XP regimen demonstrated a promising antitumor activity in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which may potentially replace the FP regimen.

Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is rising rapidly in Western Europe and North America. It is an aggressive disease with early lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination. TNM cancer staging systems predict survival on the basis of the anatomic extent of the tumor. However, the adequacy of the current TNM staging system for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is questioned repeatedly. Numerous prognostic factors have been described, but are not included in the TNM system. This review describes clinical parameters, aspects of operative technique, response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy, complications and established pathologic determinants found in the resection specimen that have a prognostic impact. Furthermore, their potential application in the clinical setting in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ is discussed. Future directions to improve staging systems are given.

The proteolysis-inducing factor: in search of its clinical relevance in patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer

The proteolysis-inducing factor is a putative mediator of cancer-associated weight loss. The goal of this study was to examine for the first time: (i) its prevalence in patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer; and (ii) whether it possibly correlated with weight loss and anorexia and whether it predicted tumor response and patient survival. This study recruited 41 patients as part of a phase II therapeutic, chemotherapy protocol for patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer. Patient eligibility criteria were designed to select a group of patients who would tolerate treatment with the drugs capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Urine for assaying the proteolysis-inducing factor was obtained at registration and then 6 weeks later. Patients completed the FACT-E questionnaire every 6 weeks and had their weights checked at the same interval. Patients were followed prospectively for tumor response and patient survival. Twenty-three (56%) patients had the proteolysis-inducing factor in their urine at registration, and 18 (64%) had it at 6 weeks. There was no statistically significant correlation between the presence of the proteolysis-inducing factor and weight loss or between its presence and anorexia. Moreover, there was no evidence that the presence of the proteolysis-inducing factor in urine was able to predict tumor response or patient survival. The proteolysis-inducing factor in urine does not appear to be tied to weight loss, anorexia, tumor response, or patient survival in the clinical setting of metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia and nutritional management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of oropharyngeal dysphagia has received growing attention recently. Specialists from many disciplines are involved and the results of developments in dysphagia management are published in a range of journals. This review reports on recent developments in the diagnosis and clinical management of dysphagia.

RECENT FINDINGS

New instruments have been developed recently for diagnosis. Clinical observations have been made that promise to provide a better understanding of the various deficits involved. Deficiencies in both recognizing and managing dysphagia have been highlighted and recent reviews published.

SUMMARY

New techniques for quantifying the type and degree of dysphagia in patients are described. Prospective studies have emphasized that dysphagia frequently remains imperfectly diagnosed; some of these newer less expensive techniques may improve diagnosis. The benefits of using multidisciplinary teams for the effective management of dysphagia have been emphasized by a number of investigators. Quality of life issues in dysphagia are becoming more widely recognized and recommendations designed to improve patients' quality of life have been made, including improvements in nutrition and the use of psychological counselling. Cochrane Reviewers have identified shortcomings in the dysphagia knowledge base and have stressed the need for more properly controlled and randomized clinical trials.

Oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia: a phase II study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

PURPOSE

The synergic combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine has demonstrated activity against various gastrointestinal cancers, including colon cancer. We therefore undertook this phase II study to test this first-line combination in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with histologic or cytologic confirmation of the above malignancy were recruited. The cohort had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of 0, 1 and 2 in 47%, 51%, and 2%, respectively. Median age was 61 years (range 32-80). All had adequate organ function. Initially, patients were prescribed 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice a day, on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Four treatment-related deaths in the first 24 patients led to a reduction in capecitabine to 850 mg/m2 orally twice a day, days 1-14, for the remainder of the cohort.

RESULTS

The tumor response rate was 35% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 23% to 50%]. All responses were partial; seven of 24 occurred before the capecitabine dose reduction, and eight of 19 after. Median time to tumor progression was 4 months (95% CI 3.1-4.6), and median survival 6.4 months (95% CI 4.6-10). To date, there have been 36 deaths. Four were treatment-related (one infection, two myocardial infarctions, one respiratory failure), and all occurred before the capecitabine dose reduction. Notable grade 4 events from the entire cohort included diarrhea (two patients), vomiting (three), dyspnea (one), thrombosis (two) and anorexia (two). Grade 3 events included nausea (12 patients), diarrhea (12), fatigue (10), abdominal pain (seven), vomiting (six), dyspnea (six), hypokalemia (six), dehydration (five), hypokalemia (five) and infection (four).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin and capecitabine in combination demonstrates activity in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia. The lower dose (capecitabine 850 mg/m2 orally twice a day, days 1-14, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) yielded an acceptable toxicity profile and merits further study.