Reflux esophagitis after esophagectomy: impact of duodenogastroesophageal reflux

Changes in Acidity Levels in the Gastric Tube After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Reflux esophagitis and gastric tube ulcer sometimes cause severe clinical problems in patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We previously reported that acidity in the gastric tube was decreased for 1 year after esophagectomy, and that lower acidity levels were associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, the long-term changes in gastric acidity remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the long-term changes in gastric acidity after surgery. Eighty-nine patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer were analyzed. They underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, serum gastrin measurement, and H. pylori infection examination before surgery, at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The gastric acidity at 1 month and 1 year after surgery was significantly lower than that before surgery (p=0.003, p=0.003). However, there was no difference in gastric acidity before and 2 years after surgery. The gas tric acidity in H. pylori-infected patients was significantly lower in comparison to non-infected patients at each time point (p=0.0003, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). In H. pylori-infected patients, gastric acid ity was decreased for 1 year after surgery, and recovered within 2 years after surgery. However, no significant differences were observed in the acidity levels of non-infected patients during the 2-year follow-up period. The serum gastrin level increased after esophagectomy. The acidity levels in the gastric tube recovered within 2 years after surgery. Periodic endoscopy examination is recommended for early detection of acid-related disease, such as reflux esophagitis or gastric tube ulcer, after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Gastric Emptying is Accelerated in Patients With Gastric Tube Reconstruction Following Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is an attractive option for the treatment of early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. No optimal method of reconstruction after LPG has been established because of problems associated with postoperative reflux. Gastric tube reconstruction, a type of esophagogastrostomy, is a simple procedure, but it is associated with a high frequency of reflux esophagitis (RE). We investigated the relationship between RE and gastric emptying, along with nutritional parameters.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We compared gastric emptying in patients who had undergone curative LPG with gastric tube reconstruction for gastric cancer with that of patients after total gastrectomy (TG), distal gastrectomy (DG) and of healthy volunteers and patients after DG. The LPG group was divided into an RE LPG-RE (+) group and a non-reflux esophagitis (non-RE) an LPG-RE (-) group, and we compared gastric emptying and indices of nutrition, such as body weight and laboratory findings, between those among LPG-RE (+), LPG-RE (-), and TG groups.

RESULTS

The time lag between ingestion and peak 13 CO 2 expiration (T lag) in the healthy volunteer group was significantly shorter in the LPG group longer than those in the healthy volunteer LPG group and TG group. The T lag was significantly shorter in the RE LPG-RE (+) group than in the non-RE LPG-RE (-) group. The percentage change in body weight percentage in the non-RE LPG-RE (-) group was significantly larger than that in the RE LPG-RE (+) group at 12 months after surgery. Both the serum albumin and hemoglobin levels in the non-RE LPG-RE (-) tended to be preserved compared with those in the RE LPG-RE (+) group and TG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric emptying was accelerated after LPG, and was associated with RE. Our data suggest that RE could be associated with body weight loss after LPG.

Effect of Head-of-Bed Elevation on Nocturnal Reflux Symptoms of Esophageal Cancer Patients With Esophagectomy and Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Studies revealed the symptom of gastroesophageal reflux (GE reflux) disturb patients following esophageal reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of head-of-bed elevation by using the wedge-shaped pillow (WSP) on the reflux symptoms of patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy and reconstruction.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with nocturnal reflux symptoms following esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups. A 2-week crossover trial was performed using 2 sequences (drug only and drug plus WSP). The WSP was designed with a height of 20 cm, a length of 62 cm, and an elevation angle of 20 degrees and used with fabricated from memory foam. After 2 weeks, all of the patients received combined drug and WSP intervention for 3 months. Reflux symptoms were measured by Dysfunction After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer and examined by endoscopic observations prior to intervention and follow-up for 3 months.

RESULT

The average reflux symptom score for the combined drug and WSP treatment in the beginning 2 weeks was lower than that for the drug-only sequence. The severity of esophagitis was improved in 46.1%, and 38.5% showed a stabilization after 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined drug and WSP treatment may be beneficial in improving GE reflux symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nursing care professionals would suggest patients find a similar WSP to elevate the head of the bed to reduce the severity of nocturnal reflux symptoms after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction.

Subtotal stomach in esophageal reconstruction surgery achieves an anastomotic leakage rate of less than 1%

Aim

The objective of this retrospective, single‐institution study was to assess the safety and feasibility of reconstruction using subtotal stomach (SS) with esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Although several different gastric‐tube‐making and anastomotic methods have been reported, the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage with EC surgery is generally reported over 10%. Complications should be avoided, and patient quality of life (QOL) should be maintained postoperatively. We have used SS reconstruction and hand‐sutured cervical esophagus‐subtotal gastric anastomosis at the neck wound in EC surgery. Short‐ and long‐term outcomes in cases using SS are not well known.

Methods

Between January 2008 and September 2019, 300 patients underwent esophagectomy for EC and reconstruction using SS. The primary endpoint was the rate of anastomotic leakage. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidities, QOL, and changes in patients’ body weight and skeletal muscle weight.

Results

Anastomotic leakage was observed in two patients (0.67%), and pneumonia was observed in nine patients (3.0%). Fifteen patients (5.0%) had an anastomotic stenosis requiring a bougie. Nausea occurred in 11 patients (3.7%), and dumping syndrome occurred in seven patients (2.3%). Dysphagia and early feeling of abdominal fullness scores tended to be high after surgery but gradually decreased after 6 months. Good results were obtained for reflux feeling scores. Body weight changed with an average decrease of −2 ± 3.71 kg (P = .071) over 5 years.

Conclusion

Reconstruction using SS resulted in an extremely low rate of anastomotic leakage and good QOL postoperatively in patients with EC.

Associations between the severity of reflux esophagitis in children and changes in oxidative stress, serum inflammation, vasoactive intestinal peptide and motilin

Changes in the levels of serum oxidative stress indexes, gastrointestinal hormones and inflammatory factors in children with different severity of reflux esophagitis (RE) were detected. Sixty child patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) via gastroscopy were selected and divided into non-erosive reflux disease group (NERD group, n=12) and RE group (n=48) according to whether there was esophageal mucosal injury. In RE group, the patients were further divided into grade I RE group (n=15), grade II RE group (n=18) and grade III RE group (n=15) based on the severity of mucosal injury. None of the child patients took PPI and domperidone within 2 weeks before enrollment. The content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) in the esophageal mucosa was detected. The changes in the levels of serum vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), motilin, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined. The DeMeester score was the highest in grade III RE group, followed by grade II RE group, grade I RE group and NERD group (P<0.05). The content of MDA in the esophageal mucosa was higher in RE group than that in NERD group, and the T-SOD activity declined with the increased severity of injury (P<0.05). In the three RE groups, the level of plasma VIP was significantly higher, while the motilin level was remarkably lower than those in NERD group (P<0.05). With the increased severity of disease, the expression levels of serum IL-1β, IL-8 and TNF-α in RE group were gradually raised (P<0.05). RE patients have strong oxidative stress and inflammatory response, an increased level of serum VIP, a regulator of gastrointestinal motility, and a decreased level of motilin. Controlling the changes in the above factors using effective treatment means can improve the development of GERD.

Impact of the Level of Anastomosis on Reflux Esophagitis Following Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Among patients who undergo gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy, it is generally accepted that the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) is significantly lower in patients with neck anastomosis than in those with intrathoracic anastomosis. However, the true impact of the level of anastomosis on RE currently remains unclear.

METHODS

We examined 53 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and neck anastomosis. The level of anastomosis was assessed by measuring the distance from the sternal notch to the stapled ring by computed tomography. The relative level of anastomosis was calculated by the distance from the sternal notch to the most caudal side of the stapled ring (mm)/height (cm).

RESULTS

The relative level of anastomosis in 30 (56.6%) patients showed <0, which indicated that anastomosis in these patients was located at a lower level than the sternal notch. The mean relative level of anastomosis was significantly lower in patients with RE (grade A to D) than in those without RE (grade N) (-0.062 vs. -0.012 mm/cm, respectively; p = 0.043). RE was more severe with a lower relative level of anastomosis (p for trends = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The level of anastomosis in patients with gastric tube reconstruction following esophagectomy was associated with the incidence of RE. The displacement of anastomosis into the thoracic cavity was detected in approximately half of the patients with neck anastomosis. RE was more severe with a lower level of anastomosis, even in patients with neck anastomosis.

The psychological impact of symptoms related to esophagogastric cancer resection presenting in primary care: A national linked database study

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate incidence, risk factors and impact of postoperative symptoms following esophagogastric cancer resection in primary care.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy for cancer from 1998 to 2010 with linked records in Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episodes Statistics and Office of National Statistics databases were studied. The recording of codes for reflux, dysphagia, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, dumping, diarrhea, steatorrhea, appetite loss, weight loss, pain and fatigue were identified up to 12 months postoperatively. Psychiatric morbidity was also examined and its risk evaluated by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 58.6% (1029/1755) of patients were alive 2 years after surgery. Of these, 41.1% had recorded postoperative symptoms. Reflux, dysphagia, dyspepsia and pain were more frequent following esophagectomy compared with gastrectomy (p < 0.05). Complications (OR = 1.40 95%CI 1.00-1.95) and surgical procedure predicted postoperative symptoms (p < 0.05). When compared with partial gastrectomy, esophagectomy (OR = 2.03 95%CI 1.26-3.27), total gastrectomy (OR = 2.44 95%CI 1.57-3.79) and esophagogastrectomy (OR = 2.66 95%CI 1.85-2.86) were associated with postoperative symptoms (p < 0.05). The majority of patients with postoperative psychiatric morbidity had depression or anxiety (98%). Predictors of postoperative depression/anxiety included younger age (OR = 0.97 95%CI 0.96-0.99), complications (OR = 2.40 95%CI 1.51-3.83), psychiatric history (OR = 6.73 95%CI 4.25-10.64) and postoperative symptoms (OR = 1.78 95%CI 1.17-2.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 40% of patients had symptoms related to esophagogastric cancer resection recorded in primary care, and were associated with an increase in postoperative depression and anxiety.