Dopaminergic behaviour in chicken retina and the effect of form deprivation

The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia

BACKGROUND

Myopia, commonly known as near-sightedness, has emerged as a global epidemic, impacting almost one in three individuals across the world. The increasing prevalence of myopia during early childhood has heightened the risk of developing high myopia and related sight-threatening eye conditions in adulthood. This surge in myopia rates, occurring within a relatively stable genetic framework, underscores the profound influence of environmental and lifestyle factors on this condition. In this comprehensive narrative review, we shed light on both established and potential environmental and lifestyle contributors that affect the development and progression of myopia.

MAIN BODY

Epidemiological and interventional research has consistently revealed a compelling connection between increased outdoor time and a decreased risk of myopia in children. This protective effect may primarily be attributed to exposure to the characteristics of natural light (i.e., sunlight) and the release of retinal dopamine. Conversely, irrespective of outdoor time, excessive engagement in near work can further worsen the onset of myopia. While the exact mechanisms behind this exacerbation are not fully comprehended, it appears to involve shifts in relative peripheral refraction, the overstimulation of accommodation, or a complex interplay of these factors, leading to issues like retinal image defocus, blur, and chromatic aberration. Other potential factors like the spatial frequency of the visual environment, circadian rhythm, sleep, nutrition, smoking, socio-economic status, and education have debatable independent influences on myopia development.

CONCLUSION

The environment exerts a significant influence on the development and progression of myopia. Improving the modifiable key environmental predictors like time spent outdoors and engagement in near work can prevent or slow the progression of myopia. The intricate connections between lifestyle and environmental factors often obscure research findings, making it challenging to disentangle their individual effects. This complexity underscores the necessity for prospective studies that employ objective assessments, such as quantifying light exposure and near work, among others. These studies are crucial for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of how various environmental factors can be modified to prevent or slow the progression of myopia.

Temporal bright light at low frequency retards lens-induced myopia in guinea pigs

Purpose

Bright light conditions are supposed to curb eye growth in animals with experimental myopia. Here we investigated the effects of temporal bright light at very low frequencies exposures on lens-induced myopia (LIM) progression.

Methods

Myopia was induced by application of -6.00 D lenses over the right eye of guinea pigs. They were randomly divided into four groups based on exposure to different lighting conditions: constant low illumination (CLI; 300 lux), constant high illumination (CHI; 8,000 lux), very low frequency light (vLFL; 300/8,000 lux, 10 min/c), and low frequency light (LFL; 300/8,000 lux, 20 s/c). Refraction and ocular dimensions were measured per week. Changes in ocular dimensions and refractions were analyzed by paired t-tests, and differences among the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

Results

Significant myopic shifts in refractive error were induced in lens-treated eyes compared with contralateral eyes in all groups after 3 weeks (all P < 0.05). Both CHI and LFL conditions exhibited a significantly less refractive shift of LIM eyes than CLI and vLFL conditions (P < 0.05). However, only LFL conditions showed significantly less overall myopic shift and axial elongation than CLI and vLFL conditions (both P < 0.05). The decrease in refractive error of both eyes correlated significantly with axial elongation in all groups (P < 0.001), except contralateral eyes in the CHI group (P = 0.231). LFL condition significantly slacked lens thickening in the contralateral eyes.

Conclusions

Temporal bright light at low temporal frequency (0.05 Hz) appears to effectively inhibit LIM progression. Further research is needed to determine the safety and the potential mechanism of temporal bright light in myopic progression.

Increased ocular dopamine levels in rabbits after blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head

The purpose was to quantify ocular dopamine in rabbits after stimulation of the optic nerve head with short-wavelength (blue) light to activate melanopsin expressed in the axons of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Dopamine levels in tears, aqueous humor, vitreous body, and retina (including choroid) were quantified after blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head of 15 rabbits with an optical fiber for 1 min, 10 min, or no stimulation (n = 5, each group). The left eye of all rabbits was operated on to introduce the optical fiber and stimulate the optic nerve, while the contralateral eye served as internal control. One minute of blue light stimulation significantly increased dopamine concentration in the vitreous body of the treated eyes compared to the contralateral ones (P = 0.015). Stimulation for 10 min significantly increased dopamine concentration in the vitreous body, as well as the aqueous humor (P < 0.05). Therefore, using an optical fiber approach to stimulate the optic nerve head with blue light significantly increased dopamine concentration in the aqueous humor and the vitreous body. This likely reflects an upregulation of retinal dopamine synthesis that could be attributed to ipRGC activation. However, the data provided in this study fell short of establishing a definitive link between dopamine release and ipRGC activation, mainly due to the lack of evidence supporting the expression of the melanopsin photopigment in the optic nerve.

Ubiquitous light-emitting diodes: Potential threats to retinal circadian rhythms and refractive development

The use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) has increased considerably in the 21st century with humans living in a modern photoperiod with brighter nights and dimmer days. Prolonged exposure to LEDs, especially at night, is considered a new source of pollution because it may affect the synthesis and secretion of retinal melatonin and dopamine, resulting in negative impacts on retinal circadian clocks and potentially disrupting retinal circadian rhythms. The control of ocular refraction is believed to be related to retinal circadian rhythms. Moreover, the global prevalence of myopia has increased at an alarming rate in recent decades. The widespread use of LEDs and the rapid increase in the prevalence of myopia overlap, which is unlikely to be a coincidence. The connection among LEDs, retinal circadian rhythms, and refractive development is both fascinating and confusing. In this review, we aim to develop a systematic framework that includes LEDs, retinal circadian rhythms and refractive development. This paper summarizes the possible mechanisms by which LEDs may disrupt retinal circadian rhythms. We propose that prolonged exposure to LEDs may induce myopia by disrupting retinal circadian rhythms. Finally, we suggest several possible countermeasures to prevent LED interference on retinal circadian rhythms, with the hope of reducing the onset and progression of myopia.

Interventions recommended for myopia prevention and control among children and adolescents in China: a systematic review

In 2018, a consortium of government bodies in China led by the Ministry of Education released the Comprehensive Plan to Prevent Nearsightedness among Children and Teenagers (CPPNCT), aiming to reduce the incidence of myopia and control myopic progression in China. Recommendations span from home-based to school-based interventions, including time outdoors, physical activity, light exposure, near-work activity, screen time, Chinese eye exercises, diet and sleep. To date, the levels of evidence for this suite of interventions have not been thoroughly investigated. This review has summarised the evidence of the interventions recommended by the CPPNCT in myopia prevention and control. Thus, the following statements are supposed by the evidence: (1) Increasing time outdoors and reducing near-work time are effective in lowering incident myopia in school-aged children. (2) All interventions have a limited effect on myopia progression. Ongoing research may lead to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of myopia development, the interaction of different interventions and recommendations, confounding variables and their true effect on myopia prevention, and the identification of those most likely to respond to specific interventions. This field may also benefit from longer-term studies of the various interventions or strategies covered within this review article, to better understand the persistence of treatment effects over time and explore more novel approaches to myopia control.

The biological basis of myopic refractive error

Myopia is among the most common refractive errors and is associated with the greatest risk of pathological outcomes. Most animals, including humans, are born with hyperopic errors. During development, axial elongation of the eye occurs and is regulated through a vision-dependent process, known as emmetropisation The extremely rapid changes in the prevalence of myopia and the dependence of myopia on the level of education indicate that there are very strong environmental impacts on the development of myopia. This conflicts with the common occurrence of familial patterns of inheritance of myopia, which suggests a role for genetic determination. There are more than 150 defined genetic syndromes in which familial high myopia is one of the features, including some that are not associated with other syndromes. The evidence for the roles of both nature and nurture in the aetiology of myopia is discussed. This review also examines the experimentally induced refractive errors associated with form-deprivation, recovery from form deprivation and the effects of both negative and positive lenses. In addition, it looks at the local and optical control of eye growth. Finally, the various control pathways for growth are considered. These include dopamine, ZENK-glucagon, retinoic acid and retinoic acid receptors, crystallin, seratonin and melatonin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and enkephalins, nitric oxide and various growth factors.

Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms

Myopia is far beyond its inconvenience and represents a true, highly prevalent, sight-threatening ocular condition, especially in Asia. Without adequate interventions, the current epidemic of myopia is projected to affect 50% of the world population by 2050, becoming the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although blurred vision, the predominant symptom of myopia, can be improved by contact lenses, glasses or refractive surgery, corrected myopia, particularly high myopia, still carries the risk of secondary blinding complications such as glaucoma, myopic maculopathy and retinal detachment, prompting the need for prevention. Epidemiological studies have reported an association between outdoor time and myopia prevention in children. The protective effect of time spent outdoors could be due to the unique characteristics (intensity, spectral distribution, temporal pattern, etc.) of sunlight that are lacking in artificial lighting. Concomitantly, studies in animal models have highlighted the efficacy of light and its components in delaying or even stopping the development of myopia and endeavoured to elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this process. In this narrative review, we (1) summarize the current knowledge concerning light modulation of ocular growth and refractive error development based on studies in human and animal models, (2) summarize potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of light on ocular growth and emmetropization and (3) highlight a potential pathway for the translational development of noninvasive light-therapy strategies for myopia prevention in children.

Visual conditions affecting eye growth alter diurnal levels of vitreous DOPAC

In chicks, the diurnal patterns of retinal dopamine synthesis and release are associated with refractive development. To assess the within-day patterns of dopamine release, we assayed vitreal levels of DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) using high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, at 4-h intervals over 24 h in eyes with experimental manipulations that change ocular growth rates. Chicks were reared under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle; experiments began at 12 days of age. Output was assessed by modelling using the robust variance structure of Generalized Estimating Equations. Continuous spectacle lensdefocus or form deprivation: One group experienced non-restricted visual input to both eyes and served as untreated "normal" controls. Three experimental cohorts underwent monocular visual alterations known to alter eye growth and refraction: wearing a diffuser, a negative lens or a positive lens. After one full day of device-wear, chicks were euthanized at 4-h intervals over 24 h (8 birds per time/condition). Brief hyperopic defocus: Chicks wore negative lenses for only 2 daily hours either in the morning (starting at ZT 0; n = 16) or mid-day (starting at ZT 4; n = 8) for 3 days. Vitreal DOPAC was assayed. In chicks with bilateral non-restricted vision, or with continuous defocus or form-deprivation, there was a diurnal variation in vitreal DOPAC levels for all eyes (p < 0.001 for each). In normal controls, DOPAC was highest during the daytime, lowest at night, and equivalent for both eyes. In experimental groups, regardless of whether experiencing a growth stimulatory input (diffuser; negative lens) or growth inhibitory input (positive lens), DOPAC levels were reduced compared both to fellow eyes and to those of normal controls (p < 0.001 for each). These diurnal variations in vitreous DOPAC levels under different visual conditions indicate a complexity for dopaminergic mechanisms in refractive development that requires further study.

Probing the Potency of Artificial Dynamic ON or OFF Stimuli to Inhibit Myopia Development

Purpose

To determine whether equiluminant artificial dynamic ON or OFF stimuli on a computer screen can induce bidirectional changes in choroidal thickness (ChTh) in both humans and chickens, and whether such changes are associated with bidirectional changes in retinal dopamine release in chickens.

Methods

Experiment 1: Before and after ON or OFF stimulation for 1 hour, ChTh was measured with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Experiment 2: chicks (n = 14) were raised under ON or OFF stimulation for 3 hours. ChTh was determined by OCT. Experiment 3: chicks were raised for 7 days either under room light (500 lux, n = 11), dynamic ON stimulus (700 lux, n = 15), or dynamic OFF stimulus (700 lux, n = 7). In addition, negative lenses were attached to their right eyes. After experiments 2 and 3, retinal and vitreal dopamine (DA), and its metabolites, were measured by HPLC-electrochemical detection.

Results

Experiment 1: Dynamic ON stimuli caused thicker choroids (+5.3 ± 2.0 μm), whereas OFF stimuli caused choroidal thinning (-4.7 ± 0.5 μm) (right eye data only, P < 0.001). Experiment 2: After 3 hours, chickens developed thicker choroids with ON stimuli (+37.4 ± 12.4 μm) and thinner choroids with OFF stimuli (-11.3 ± 3.6 μm, difference P < 0.01). Vitreal DA, 3-methoxytyramine, and homovanillic acid levels were elevated after ON stimulation, compared with the OFF (P < 0.05). Experiment 3: After 7 days, chickens with lenses developed more myopia both with ON and OFF stimulation, compared with room light. ON stimulation increased vitreal DA compared with OFF.

Conclusions

Artificial dynamic ON or OFF stimuli had similar effects on ChTh in humans and chickens, but more work will be necessary to determine whether such stimuli can be used as novel interventions of myopia.

Effects of the Tyrosinase-Dependent Dopaminergic System on Refractive Error Development in Guinea Pigs

Purpose

To determine if myopia in albino guinea pigs is linked to altered ocular dopamine (DA) levels in both the retinal and uveal dopaminergic systems.

Methods

Retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid were dissected from eyes of 2-week-old albino myopic (AM) and pigmented hyperopic (PH) guinea pigs. The levels of DA, dihydroxy-phenyl acetic acid (DOPAC), and homovanillic acid (HVA) were determined. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and tyrosinase activities were also measured. PH animals received daily unilateral peribulbar injections of either kojic acid (tyrosinase inhibitor) or vehicle for 2 to 4 weeks. Refractive errors and ocular axial dimensions were measured by eccentric infrared photoretinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography.

Results

Retinal DA levels were similar between the two strains, but AM eyes had higher levels of DOPAC. RPE/choroid DA and tyrosinase activity in AM eyes were lower than in PH eyes (P < 0.01); however, the DA turnover was higher (P < 0.05). After 2 weeks of kojic acid treatment, PH eyes developed significant myopia, accompanied by elongated vitreous chambers and axial lengths. Inhibition of tyrosinase activity was linearly correlated with a myopic refraction shift (R = 0.79, P < 0.01). PH animals that received 62.5 ng/mL kojic acid treatment daily for 2 weeks followed by 625 ng/mL for 2 more weeks became more myopic and had deeper anterior chambers compared to those that received the 62.5 ng/mL dose over this period (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

The uveal tyrosinase-dependent dopaminergic system is involved in the development of guinea pig refraction. Enhancing uveal tyrosinase activity might slow down the development of myopia.

Dopamine signaling and myopia development: What are the key challenges

In the face of an "epidemic" increase in myopia over the last decades and myopia prevalence predicted to reach 2.5 billion people by the end of this decade, there is an urgent need to develop effective and safe therapeutic interventions to slow down this "myopia booming" and prevent myopia-related complications and vision loss. Dopamine (DA) is an important neurotransmitter in the retina and mediates diverse functions including retina development, visual signaling, and refractive development. Inspired by the convergence of epidemiological and animal studies in support of the inverse relationship between outdoor activity and risk of developing myopia and by the close biological relationship between light exposure and dopamine release/signaling, we felt it is timely and important to critically review the role of DA in myopia development. This review will revisit several key points of evidence for and against DA mediating light control of myopia: 1) the causal role of extracellular retinal DA levels, 2) the mechanism and action of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors and 3) the roles of cellular/circuit retinal pathways. We examine the experiments that show causation by altering DA, DA receptors and visual pathways using pharmacological, transgenic, or visual environment approaches. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the safety issues of a DA-based treatment strategy and some approaches to address these issues. The review identifies the key questions and challenges in translating basic knowledge on DA signaling and myopia from animal studies into effective pharmacological treatments for myopia in children.

Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors prevent the growth-inhibiting effects of quinpirole

PURPOSE

Both dopamine and nitric oxide (NO) have been implicated in the signal cascade mediating ocular growth inhibition. If both are part of the same pathway, which precedes the other? We tested the hypothesis that dopamine acts upstream of NO, by using two NOS inhibitors in combination with the dopamine agonist quinpirole, and measured the effects on ocular growth rate.

METHODS

Chicks wore -10 D lenses or diffusers (FD) for 4 days starting at age 13 days. Experimental eyes received daily 20 μL injections of the following: quinpirole-lens: n = 12, FD: n = 20; n-ω-propyl-L-arginine (NPA)-lens: n = 6, FD: n = 4; quinpirole + NPA-lens: n = 17, FD: n = 19; and quinpirole + L-NIO-lens: n = 12, FD: n = 12. Saline injections were done as controls. High-frequency ultrasonography was done at the start, and on day 5, prior to injections and 3 hours later. Refractions were measured on day 5.

RESULTS

As expected, quinpirole prevented the development of axial myopia in both paradigms. When quinpirole was combined with either NOS inhibitor, however, eyes became myopic compared to quinpirole (FD: NPA: -5.9 D vs. -3.4 D; L-NIO: -5.8 D vs. -3.4 D; lens: NPA: -3.5 D vs. -0.4 D; p < 0.05 for all; L-NIO was not significant). This was the result of a disinhibition of vitreous chamber growth versus quinpirole (FD: NPA: 401 vs. 275 μm/4 d; L-NIO: 440 vs. 275 μm/4 d; LENS: NPA: 407 vs. 253µm/4 d; L-NIO: 403 vs. 253 μm/4 d; p < 0.05). Only NPA prevented the quinpirole-induced choroidal thickening in lens-wearing eyes (0 vs. 31 μm/3 h; p < 0.05). Choroidal thickening was not inhibited by either drug in FD eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine acts upstream of NO and the choroidal response in the signal cascade mediating ocular growth inhibition in both form deprivation and negative lens wear. That neither NOS inhibitor inhibits choroidal thickening in FD eyes suggests that the choroidal mechanisms differ in the two paradigms.

Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?

In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.

Myopic shift and outdoor activity among primary school children: one-year follow-up study in Beijing

Purpose

To assess whether a change in myopia related oculometric parameters of primary school children in Beijing was associated with indoors and outdoors activity.

Methods

The longitudinal school-based study included school children who were examined in 2011 and who were re-examined in 2012. The children underwent a comprehensive eye examination including ocular biometry by optical low-coherence reflectometry and non-cycloplegic refractometry. Parents and children had a detailed interview including questions on time spent indoors and outdoors.

Results

Out of 681 students examined at baseline, 643 (94.4%) returned for follow-up examination. Within the one-year period, mean time spent daily outdoors increased by 0.4±0.9 hours, mean axial length by 0.26±0.49 mm, the ratio of axial length divided by anterior corneal curvature (AL/CC) by 0.03±0.06, and myopic refractive error by −0.06±0.89 diopters. In multivariate analysis, elongation of axial length was significantly associated with less total time spent outdoors (P = 0.02; standardized coefficient beta −0.12) and more time spent indoors with studying (P = 0.007; beta: 0.14) after adjustment for maternal myopia (P = 0.02; beta: 0.12). An increase in AL/CC was significantly associated with less time spent outdoors (P = 0.01; beta:−0.12) after adjustment for paternal myopia (P = 0.003; beta: 0.15) and if region of habitation was excludedors for leisure (P = 0.006; beta:−0.13), with less total time spent outdoors (P = 0.04; beta:−0.10), or with more time spent i. An increase in myopic refractive error, after adjustment for age, was significantly associated with less time spent outdo ndoors with studying (P = 0.005; beta: 0.13).

Conclusions

A change in oculometric parameters indicating an increase in myopia was significantly associated with less time spent outdoors and more time spent indoors in school children in Greater Beijing within a study period of one year. Our study provides additional information on the potentially helpful role of outdoors activity in the prevention of myopia. Public health care measures such as school agendas may potentially take it into account.

An updated view on the role of dopamine in myopia

A large body of data is available to support the hypothesis that dopamine (DA) is one of the retinal neurotransmitters involved in the signaling cascade that controls eye growth by vision. Initially, reduced retinal DA levels were observed in eyes deprived of sharp vision by either diffusers ("deprivation myopia", DM) or negative lenses ("lens induced myopia", LIM). Simulating high retinal DA levels by intravitreal application of a DA agonist can suppress the development of both DM and LIM. Also more recent studies using knock-out mouse models of DA receptors support the idea of an association between decreased DA levels and DM. There seem to be differences in the magnitude of the effects of DA on DM and LIM, with larger changes in DM but the degrees of image degradation by both treatments need to be matched to support this conclusion. Although a number of studies have shown that the inhibitory effects of dopamine agonists on DM and LIM are mediated through stimulation of the D2-receptor, there is also recent evidence that the balance of D2- and D1-receptor activation is important. Inhibition of D2-receptors can also slow the development of spontaneous myopia in albino guinea pigs. Retinal DA content displays a distinct endogenous diurnal, and partially circadian rhythm. In addition, retinal DA is regulated by a number of visual stimuli like retinal illuminance, spatial frequency content of the image, temporal contrast and, in chicks, by the light input from the pineal organ. A close interaction was found between muscarinergic and dopaminergic systems, and between nitric oxide and dopaminergic pathways, and there is evidence for crosstalk between the different pathways, perhaps multiple binding of the ligands to different receptors. It was shown that DA agonists interact with the immediate early signaling molecule ZENK which triggers the first steps in eye growth regulation. However, since long treatment periods were often needed to induce significant changes in retinal dopamine synthesis and release, the role of dopamine in the early steps is unclear. The wide spatial distribution of dopaminergic amacrine cells in the retina and the observation that changes in dopamine levels can be locally induced by local retinal deprivation is in line with the assumption that dopaminergic mechanisms control both central and peripheral eye growth. The protective effect of outdoor activity on myopia development in children seems to be partly mediated by the stimulatory effect of light on retinal dopamine production and release. However, the dose-response function linking light exposure to dopamine and to the suppression of myopia is not known and requires further studies.

Image defocus and altered retinal gene expression in chick: clues to the pathogenesis of ametropia

PURPOSE

Because of the retina's role in refractive development, this study was conducted to analyze the retinal transcriptome in chicks wearing a spectacle lens, a well-established means of inducing refractive errors, to identify gene expression alterations and to develop novel mechanistic hypotheses about refractive development.

METHODS

One-week-old white Leghorn chicks wore a unilateral spectacle lens of +15 or -15 D for 6 hours or 3 days. With total RNA from the retina/(retinal pigment epithelium, RPE), chicken gene microarrays were used to compare gene expression levels between lens-wearing and contralateral control eyes (n = 6 chicks for each condition). Normalized microarray signal intensities were evaluated by analysis of variance, using a false discovery rate of <10% as the statistical criterion. Selected differentially expressed genes were validated by qPCR.

RESULTS

Very few retina/RPE transcripts were differentially expressed after plus lens wear. In contrast, approximately 1300 transcripts were differentially expressed under each of the minus lens conditions, with minimal overlap. For each condition, low fold-changes typified the altered transcriptome. Differentially regulated genes under the minus lens conditions included many potentially informative signaling molecules and genes whose protein products have roles in intrinsic retinal circadian rhythms.

CONCLUSIONS

Plus or minus lens wear induce markedly different, not opposite, alterations in retina/RPE gene expression. The initial retinal responses to defocus are quite different from those when the eye growth patterns are well established, suggesting that different mechanisms govern the initiation and persistence or progression of refractive errors. The gene lists identify promising signaling candidates and regulatory pathways for future study, including a potential role for circadian rhythms in refractive development.

Effects of direct intravitreal dopamine injection on sclera and retina in form-deprived myopic rabbits

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate morphologic changes of retina and sclera in form-deprived myopic rabbits following intravitreal dopamine injection.

METHODS

Neonatal rabbits were monocularly deprived of form vision by suturing the right eyelids after natural eye opening. In the form deprivation (FD) group, the right eye received FD alone. In the dopamine-form deprivation (DA-FD) group, the deprived eye received an intravitreal injection of 20 microg of dopamine every 5 days for a total of 4 injections. In the saline-FD group, the deprived eye received saline injections to the same schedule as the DA-FD group. The untreated contralateral eyes were used as controls. After an 8-week treatment period, the effects of DA on sclera and retina anterior and posterior to the equator were evaluated by light and electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Treated eyes in the FD and saline-FD groups developed form deprivation myopia. These eyes had markedly reduced scleral thickness and smaller diameter scleral collagen fibrils posterior to the equator. In addition, the normal gradient of fibril size from the outer to the inner layers of the posterior sclera was absent in the treated eyes of both the FD and saline-FD groups. In contrast, posterior scleral thickness was greater in DA-FD eyes than in contralateral controls. A distinct swelling of retinal pigment epithelium mitochondria was observed in the treated eye of the DA-FD group, but no obvious retinal abnormalities were found in the treated eyes of the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The sclera, especially posterior sclera, plays an important role in both the induction and inhibition of myopia. An additional finding was that changes in the sclera of rabbits with low myopia were similar to those of the sclera of other mammals with high myopia. The results of this study will contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms of myopia development and inhibition by intravitreal dopamine injection.

Dopaminergic agents affect the ability of brief periods of normal vision to prevent form-deprivation myopia

Placing a translucent diffuser over the eye of a chick causes the eye to grow excessively, resulting in form-deprivation myopia. For chickens kept on a 12:12 h light/dark cycle, removing the diffuser for 3 h during the light period protects against the excessive growth, but if the bird is kept in the dark for this 3-h period, the protective effect is abolished. Injecting dopamine agonists into the eye during this 3-h dark period restores the protective effect, which can be blocked by dopamine antagonists injected just prior to diffuser removal in the light. These responses are mediated by D2 receptors, suggesting that the protective effect of normal vision against form-deprivation is mediated through the stimulation of dopamine release and activation of D2-dopamine receptors.

Evaluation of inner retinal function in myopia using oscillatory potentials of the multifocal electroretinogram

PURPOSE

Oscillatory potentials have been suggested to arise from the inner retina at the level of amacrine cells and inner plexiform layer and they are thought to provide a non-invasive assessment of inner retinal function. We sought to investigate the response dynamics of the inner retina of adult emmetropes and myopes by analysing the oscillatory potentials of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in these groups.

METHODS

Eleven emmetropes and 18 myopes underwent mfERG testing using VERIS 5.1.5X. Myopes were further separated based on whether their myopia was stable (n=9) or progressing (n=9). Oscillatory potentials were recorded using a modified mfERG stimulation technique, the slow flash paradigm, and they were extracted using band-pass filtering from 100 to 300 Hz. The slow flash mfERG stimulus array consisted of 103-scaled hexagons and flickered according to a pseudorandom binary m-sequence (2(13)-1). Amplitudes and implicit times of the first-order oscillatory potentials were analysed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the implicit time of the oscillatory potentials of the emmetropes, stable myopes and progressing myopes (F(2,25)=3.663, p=0.043). Progressing myopes had significantly shorter implicit times compared to emmetropes (p=0.026 by 1.0-4.7 ms) and stable myopes (p=0.043 by 0.8-1.3 ms), whereas implicit times of stable myopes and emmetropes were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in amplitude of the oscillatory potentials between the groups (F(2,25)=0.890, p=0.426).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in multifocal oscillatory potentials between stable and progressing myopes were found. This finding is further evidence of an inner retinal involvement in human myopia progression and may suggest an underlying alteration to dopaminergic or GABAergic retinal systems.

Retinal adaptation responses revealed by global flash multifocal electroretinogram are dependent on the degree of myopic refractive error

PURPOSE

There is evidence that the inner retina is involved in eye growth control processes and the development of myopia. We sought to investigate the response dynamics of the inner retina of adult emmetropes and myopes using the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) paradigm.

METHODS

Fourteen myopes and 10 emmetropic subjects (mean age: 21.0+/-2.8 years) underwent mfERG testing using VERIS 5.1.5X. The global flash stimulus array consisted of 103-scaled hexagons which flickered according to a pseudorandom binary m-sequence (2(13)-1). The stimulation sequence was modified by inserting three frames, a dark frame, a global (full screen) flash, and another dark frame. The amplitude and implicit time of the two distinct waveform features, an early direct component (DC) and a later induced component (IC) of the first-order kernel were analyzed. Retinal responses were averaged over rings of increasing eccentricity, or into nasal and temporal hemifields.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the DC and IC response amplitude and myopic refractive error, i.e., the greater the myopic error, the greater the response amplitude. However, when comparing between the two refractive error groups, DC and IC response amplitudes of emmetropes and myopes were similar, even after compensating for the effect of axial length. There were no significant differences in implicit times of the DC and IC in emmetropes and myopes.

CONCLUSIONS

Global flash mfERG responses of emmetropes and myopes were not found to be significantly different. The measured retinal adaptation response however varied according to the degree of myopia. We hypothesize that dopamine, a neurotransmitter that plays a key role in retinal adaptation and is known to be reduced in myopic eyes, may be involved in the retinal adaptation effect observed.

Delayed mfERG responses in myopia

It has been suggested that changes in the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) responses in myopes are primarily due to the increased axial length that accompanies myopia development. We investigated the characteristics of mfERG responses between emmetropes and myopes and determined the contribution of axial length to the mfERG data in 30 subjects (10 emmetropes and 20 myopes) using VERIS I. The amplitude and implicit time of the first positive peak (P1) of the first-order kernel were analyzed. We found that P1 implicit time in myopes was significantly longer by 1.3-3.1 ms than that of the emmetropes and this was not explained by the myopes having greater axial lengths than the emmetropes. Axial length contributed to 15% of the implicit time total variance while refractive error accounted for 27%. Delayed mfERG responses observed in myopes were not attributable to the anatomical change that accompanies myopia and may suggest underlying differences in retinal function that result from being myopic.

Local patterns of image degradation differentially affect refraction and eye shape in chick

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual blur as a mechanism for modulating eye shape.

METHODS

Chicks wore a unilateral full goggle or one of several goggles modified with apertures. After 2 weeks, eyes were measured with refractometry, ultrasound, and calipers, and three retinal regions were assayed for dopamine and DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid).

RESULTS

Goggled eyes were diffusely enlarged or enlarged predominantly along the axial dimension, depending on the goggle. Myopia developed under goggle types inducing primarily axial growth and under some of the goggles inducing diffuse eye expansion. Enlarged eyes remained emmetropic beneath other goggles that caused diffuse eye expansion. Reductions in retinal dopamine and DOPAC were proportional to the eye growth and refraction effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Localized image degradation can cause myopia with predominantly axial expansion, myopia with more diffuse vitreous chamber expansion, or eye expansion without myopia. Robust expansion of the equatorial diameter alone was not observed. The associated alterations in retinal dopamine metabolism are consistent with a hypothesized role of dopaminergic amacrine cells in the visual regulation of eye growth. Besides refraction and overall size, visual blur can affect eye shape; but the goggle responses do not correspond to a simple summation of blur signals across the retina. Therefore, other mechanisms seemingly are needed to account for the full range of refractions and ocular shapes seen in chicks and, by analogy, in humans.

Effects of direct intravitreal dopamine injections on the development of lid-suture induced myopia in rabbits

BACKGROUND

Dopamine (DA) storage and release are reduced in form deprivation myopia (FDM) in a wide range of species, from chicks to primates. FDM can be prevented by treatment with DA agonists such as apomorphine, and paradoxically by the dopamine neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine. In this study, we increased the DA levels by direct intravitreal DA injections to learn if FDM can be suppressed in a rabbit model.

METHODS

Seven-day-old rabbits were deprived of pattern vision by the suturing the right eyelids after natural eye opening. In the first group (FD, n=20), the right eye received form deprivation (FD) alone. In the second group (DA-FD, n=16), the deprived eye of 7-day-old rabbits received four intravitreal injections of 20 microg dopamine every 5 days. In the third group (saline-FD, n=16), the deprived eye received saline injections with the same schedule. The contralateral eye remained untreated as a control. At the end of the 8-week deprivation period, the effects of DA on refractive error, corneal curvature and ocular dimensions were assessed by streak retinoscopy, keratometry and A-scan ultrasonography, respectively.

RESULTS

Eight weeks of FDM induced a myopic shift of -2.70+/-0.87 D (n=20) in treated eyes compared with contralateral eyes. The major structural correlate of the myopia appeared to be elongation of the vitreous chamber (0.7+/-0.3 mm, n=20) and axial elongation (0.9+/-0.3 mm, n=20), respectively. Repeated intravitreal injections of DA fully prevented the myopic shift (-0.06+/-0.37 D), elongation of the vitreous chamber (0.1+/-0.3 mm, n=16) and axial elongation (0.3+/-0.2 mm, n=16) due to lid suture, whereas saline injections had slight effect.

CONCLUSIONS

FD by suturing eyelids is an effective technique to induce a significant myopic shift, vitreous chamber and axial elongation in rabbits as a model of myopia development. These changes associated with FD were retarded by intravitreal injections of DA.

The role of the retinal pigment epithelium in eye growth regulation and myopia: a review

Myopia is increasing in prevalence world-wide, nearing epidemic proportions in some populations. This has led to expanded research efforts to understand how ocular growth and refractive errors are regulated. Eye growth is sensitive to visual experience, and is altered by both form deprivation and optical defocus. In these cases, the primary targets of growth regulation are the choroidal and scleral layers of the eye that demarcate the boundary of the posterior vitreous chamber. Of significance to this review are observations of local growth modulation that imply that the neural retina itself must be the source of growth-regulating signals. Thus the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), interposed between the retina and the choroid, is likely to play a critical role in relaying retinal growth signals to the choroid and sclera. This review describes the ion transporters and signal receptors found in the chick RPE and their possible roles in visually driven changes in eye growth. We focus on the effects of four signaling molecules, otherwise implicated in eye growth changes (dopamine, acetylcholine, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and glucagon), on RPE physiology, including fluid transport. A model for RPE-mediated growth regulation is proposed.

Spatial, temporal, and intensive determinants of dopamine release in the chick retina

The retinal dopaminergic system is a global regulator of retinal function. Apart from the fact that the rates of dopamine synthesis and release are increased by increasing illumination, the visual image parameters that influence dopaminergic function are mostly unknown. Roles for spatial and temporal frequency and image contrast are suggested by the effects of form-deprivation with a diffusing goggle. Form-deprivation reduces the rates of dopamine synthesis and release, and induces myopia, which is prevented by dopamine agonists. Our purpose here was to identify visual stimulus parameters that activate dopaminergic amacrine cells and elicit dopamine release. White Leghorn cockerels 4–7 days old were exposed to 2 h of form-deprivation, reduced light intensity, or stimuli of varied temporal or spatial frequency. Activation of dopaminergic neurons, labeled for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), was assessed with immunocytochemistry for c-Fos, and dopamine release was measured by HPLC analysis of dopamine metabolite accumulation in the vitreous body. Form-deprivation did not reduce TH+ cell activation or vitreal dopamine metabolite accumulation any more than did neutral-density filters of approximately equal transmittance. TH+ cell activation and vitreal metabolite accumulation were not affected significantly by exposure to 2, 5, 10, 15, or 20 Hz stroboscopic stimulation on a dark background, or by sine-wave gratings of 0.089, 0.44, 0.89, 1.04, or 3.13 cycles/deg compared to a uniform gray target of equal mean luminance. These data indicate that the retinal dopaminergic system does not respond readily to short-term changes in visual stimulus parameters, other than light intensity, under the conditions of these experiments.

Deprivation of form vision suppresses diurnal cycling of retinal levels of leu-enkephalin

Deprivation of form vision by the fitting of translucent occluders suppressed the diurnal cycling of enkephalinergic amacrine cells (the ENSLI amacrine cells), in the chicken. Daily periods of normal vision or enforcing temporal contrast using strobe lighting appeared to restore normal functioning of the ENSLI cells. These results suggest that the ENSLI cells are involved in retinal circuits that assess the quality of the visual image and control eye growth.