The Quality of Surgical Care Project: benchmark standards of open resection for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Western Australia

Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risks

Computational biomechanics via finite element analysis (FEA) has long promised a means of assessing patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk with greater efficacy than current clinically used size-based criteria. The pursuit stems from the notion that AAA rupture occurs when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Quantification of peak (maximum) wall stress (PWS) has been at the cornerstone of this research, with numerous studies having demonstrated that PWS better differentiates ruptured AAAs from non-ruptured AAAs. In contrast to wall stress models, which have become progressively more sophisticated, there has been relatively little progress in estimating patient-specific wall strength. This is because wall strength cannot be inferred non-invasively, and measurements from excised patient tissues show a large spectrum of wall strength values. In this review, we highlight studies that investigated the relationship between biomechanics and AAA rupture risk. We conclude that combining wall stress and wall strength approximations should provide better estimations of AAA rupture risk. However, before personalized biomechanical AAA risk assessment can become a reality, better methods for estimating patient-specific wall properties or surrogate markers of aortic wall degradation are needed. Artificial intelligence methods can be key in stratifying patients, leading to personalized AAA risk assessment.

Fenestrated Endografting for Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A 7-Year Experience

Purpose:

To present a 7-year single-center clinical experience with fenestrated endografts and side branches.

Methods:

Between April 1999 and August 2006, 63 patients (57 men; mean age 70.5611.6 years, range 25–89) received custom-designed Zenith fenestrated endoprostheses for a variety of aneurysms (59 abdominal, 1 thoracoabdominal, and 3 thoracic). They were all unsuitable for standard EVAR owing to short aortic necks and high risk for open surgery.

Results:

Nineteen tube grafts and 44 composite bifurcated grafts with a total of 122 fenestrations and 58 side branches were used. Technical success was achieved in 55 (87.3%) patients and in 118 (96.7%) vessels. Treatment success was 93.7%. The mean follow-up was 23±18 months (median 14, range 6–77). Overall, 9 (7.4%) visceral branches were lost: 4 intraoperative, 2 perioperative, and 3 late. There were 12 (19.0%) endoleaks identified: 5 (7.9%: 4 type Ia and 1 fenestration-related type III) primary and 7 (11.1%: 4 type II, 1 type I, and 2 type III) secondary endoleaks; 4 resolved, 4 were treated, and 4 are under observation. At 77 months, 75.3% of patients were free of a reintervention. All reinterventions were performed within the first 14 months. Fourteen cases of renal impairment were seen [6 permanent (only 1 on dialysis) and 8 transient]. One (1.6%) conversion and 1 (1.6%) rupture were recorded; aneurysm-related mortality was 4.8% (3/63).

Conclusion:

The favorable outcomes in this study, which encompasses the team's learning curve with fenestrated endografts and side branches, support the use of these devices in selected patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

A substantial proportion of patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) die outside hospital. The objective of this study was to estimate the total mortality, including prehospital deaths, of patients with rAAA.

Methods

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis following the MOOSE guidelines. The Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All population-based studies reporting both prehospital and in-hospital mortality in patients with rAAA were included. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and heterogeneity, and pooled estimates of mortality from rAAA were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

From a total of 3667 studies, 24 retrospective cohort studies, published between 1977 and 2012, met the inclusion criteria. The quality of included studies varied, in particular the method of determining prehospital deaths from rAAA. The estimated pooled total mortality rate was 81 (95 per cent confidence interval 78 to 83) per cent. A decline in mortality was observed over time (P = 0·002); the pooled estimate of total mortality in high-quality studies before 1990 was 86 (83 to 89) per cent, compared with 74 (72 to 77) per cent since 1990. Some 32 (27 to 37) per cent of patients with rAAA died before reaching hospital. The in-hospital non-intervention rate was 40 (33 to 47) per cent, which also declined over the years.

Conclusion

The pooled estimate of total mortality from rAAA is very high, although it has declined over the years. Most patients die outside hospital, and there is no surgical intervention in a considerable number of those who survive to reach hospital.

Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients>80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of open repair in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in patients>80 years old is questioned by the perceived high operative risk of these patients. This issue has been investigated in the present meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

Studies on open repair of RAAA in patients>80 years old were identified in July 2010. The immediate and intermediate results were expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Linear regression and meta-regression were performed to evaluate the impact of variables on the immediate postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 29 studies showed that the risk of immediate postoperative mortality in patients>80 years old was significantly higher than in younger patients (risk ratio 1.440, 95%CI 1.365-1.519, I2 36.8%, P=0.002; risk difference 19.4%, 95% CI 16.4-22.4%, I2 38.8%, P=0.019). Pooled analysis of 36 studies showed an immediate postoperative mortality rate of 59.2% (95% CI 55.7-62.5, I2 35.62). Immediate postoperative mortality in patients<80 years old positively correlated with that of patients>80 years old (rho: 0.686, P<0.0001). Intermediate survival data of 111 operative survivors were available from six studies, and their pooled survival rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 82.4, 75.6, and 68.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and intermediate survival rates of patients>80 years old after open repair of RAAA are acceptable. These findings suggest a more confident approach toward emergency repair of RAAA in the very elderly.

Elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a seven-year experience

Introduction

The seven-year experience of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair of a vascular surgical unit in a teaching hospital was reviewed to determine the factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

Methods

All patients who underwent elective open repair of an AAA between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1998, were identified using International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Twenty-four variables were selected for investigation by reviewing the published literature and by discussion with local vascular surgeons. Data were obtained by retrospective medical record review. Variables were first analysed by univariate analysis, and those with a p-value up to 0.25 were included in multivariate analysis.

Results

Of the 219 patients reviewed, 8 (3.7%, 95% confidence interval, 1.6%, 7.1%) died during the admission. The mean age of patients was 69.9 years, and 81% of them were male. Univariate analysis found that female sex, renal artery involvement in the aneurysm, and aortic cross-clamp duration of 90 min or greater were significantly associated with mortality. Multivariate analysis found that female sex, use of a bifurcated graft, and performance of an additional procedure at the time of operation were the only variables independently associated with mortality.

Discussion

Use of a bifurcated graft was a significant prognostic variable on logistic regression analysis confirming that the technical difficulty of the operation and the morphology of the aneurysm are important factors in determining mortality. Why women may be at higher risk for death is unclear. This study also highlights that caution is required when interpreting raw audit data.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in outcome after intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

The aim of this study was to assess possible differences in mortality between men and women with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated either by elective repair or following aneurysm rupture.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase databases. Data were analysed by means of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Data were pooled and odds ratios (ORs) calculated for women compared with men.

Results

Sixty-one studies (516 118 patients) met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Twenty-six reported on elective open AAA repair, 21 on elective endovascular repair, 25 on open repair for ruptured AAA and one study on endovascular repair for ruptured AAA. Mortality rates for women compared with men were 7·6 versus 5·1 per cent (OR 1·28, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·09 to 1·49) for elective open repair, 2·9 versus 1·5 per cent (OR 2·41, 95 per cent c.i. 1·14 to 5·15) for elective endovascular repair, and 61·8 versus 42·2 per cent (OR 1·16, 95 per cent c.i. 0·97 to 1·37) in the group that had open repair for rupture. The group that had endovascular repair for ruptured AAA was too small for meaningful analysis.

Conclusion

Women with an AAA had a higher mortality rate following elective open and endovascular repair.

Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of restrictive versus standard fluid regime in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is associated with a significant morbidity (primarily respiratory and cardiac complications) and an overall mortality rate of 4% to 10%. We tested the hypothesis that perioperative fluid restriction would reduce complications and improve outcome after elective open AAA repair.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized control trial, patients undergoing elective open infra-renal AAA repair were randomized to a "standard" or "restricted" perioperative fluid administration group. Primary outcome measure was rate of major complications (MC) after AAA repair and secondary outcome measures included: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score; FiO2/PO2 ratio; Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio; Length-of-stay in, intensive care unit, high dependency unit, in-hospital. This prospective Randomized Controlled Trial was registered in a publicly accessible database and has the following ID number ISRCTN27753612.

RESULTS

Overall 22 patients were randomized, 1 was excluded on a priori criteria, leaving standard group (11) and restricted group (10) for analysis. No significant difference was noted between groups in respect to age, gender, American Society Anesthesiology class, Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity scores, operation time, and operation blood loss. There were no in-hospital deaths and no 30-day mortality. The cumulative fluid balance on day 5 postoperative was for standard group, 8242 +/- 714 mL, compared with restricted group, 2570 +/- 977 mL, P < 0.01. MC were significantly reduced in the restricted group (n = 10), 1 MC, compared with standard group (n = 11), 14 MC, P < 0.024. Total and postoperative length-of-stay in-hospital was significantly reduced in the restricted group, 9 +/- 1 and 8 +/- 1 days, compared with standard group, 18 +/- 5 and 16 +/- 5 days, P < 0.01 and P < 0.025, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serious complications are common after elective open AAA repair, and we have shown for the first time that a restricted perioperative fluid regimen can prevent MC and significantly reduce overall hospital stay.

Positive fluid balance is associated with complications after elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is associated with cardiac and respiratory complications and an overall mortality rate of 2 to 8%. We hypothesised that excessive fluid administration during the perioperative period contributes to complications and poor outcome after AAA repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Medical records were analysed for fluid balance and complications in 100 consecutive patients treated by open AAA repair at a single centre between 2002-2005. Mortality and all major adverse events (MAE) such as myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrhythmia (Arr), pulmonary oedema (PO), pulmonary infection (PI), and acute renal failure (ARF) were included in the analysis. Level of care and hospital stay, were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no in-hospital deaths. MAE occurred in 40/100 (40%): MI (6%); Arr (14%); PO (14%); PI (25%); ARF (8%). Complications were not predicted by preoperative cardiovascular risk factors, operative and clamp time, or blood loss. Patients with complications had significantly greater cumulative positive fluid balance on postoperative day 0 (p<0.01), day 1 (p<0.05), day 2 (p<0.03) and day 3 (p<0.04). This relationship also existed for individual complications such as MI, and pulmonary oedema. These patients had significantly longer ICU/HDU (p<0.002) and hospital stay (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serious complications are common after elective open AAA repair, and we have shown that positive fluid balance is predictive of major adverse events increased HDU/ICU and overall hospital stay.

Outcomes of Fenestrated Endografts in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Western Australia (1997–2004)

PURPOSE

To describe a 7-year experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using fenestrated Zenith endovascular endografts.

METHODS

Six endovascular surgeons from 7 medical centers in Perth, Western Australia, contributed data to this retrospective study of 58 AAA patients (51 men; mean age 75.5+/-8.5 years, range 60-94) treated with fenestrated endografts. Fenestrations were applied to 116 target vessels; more than half of patients had >/=2 target vessels. The results were based on satisfactory deployment of the stent-graft and fenestrations (technical success), technical success and no complications (procedural success), and aneurysm exclusion with no endoleak, rupture, unresolved complications, or dialysis (treatment success).

RESULTS

Technical success was 82.8% for patients (90.5% for target vessels), procedural success was 74.1%, and treatment success was 94.8%. There were no cases of conversion or rupture. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4% (n=2). Over a mean follow-up of 1.4+/-1.2 years, 10 (17.2%) patients experienced loss of a target vessel (9.5% of target vessels). Factors associated with target vessel loss were no stent, >60 degrees neck angulation, multiple renal vessels, and vessel diameter </=4 mm. Four (6.9%) patients developed renal impairment, but none required dialysis. Fourteen (24.1%) patients had a secondary intervention. Unresolved endoleaks persisted in 1 (1.7%) patient.

CONCLUSION

Fenestrated endografts extend the treatment options for infrarenal AAAs with necks unsuitable for standard endovascular repair. This early data show a trend toward higher mortality of selected patients with fenestrated endografts than for standard stent-graft repair, but the mortality rate is comparable to open repair. Target vessel occlusion predominantly results from pre-existing disease or the lack of a stent. The lessons learned from this experience contributed toward guidelines for users of fenestrated endografts.

Improving the evidence base for promoting quality and equity of surgical care using population-based linkage of administrative health records

This paper highlights the uses of population-based linkage of administrative health records to improve the quality, safety, and equity of surgical care. The primary focus of the paper is on the transfer of this type of research into policy and practice. In the modern era of evidence-based medicine, it is essential that not only is new evidence incorporated into clinical practice, but that the implementation and associated costs are monitored; this requires the setting of appropriate benchmarking criteria. Furthermore, it is imperative that all members of the population receive optimal health care and people are not discriminated against because of socio-economic, locational, or racial factors. The use of data linkage can assist with examining these aspects of health care and this paper provides real-life examples such as costs and adverse events from laparoscopic cholecystectomy, event monitoring for post-operative venous thrombosis, and inequalities in cancer care. The influence of these studies on clinical practice and policy is also discussed. Furthermore, this paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of data linkage research and how to avoid pitfalls. Health researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers will find the discussion of these issues useful in their everyday practice.

Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men reduces mortality.

DESIGN

Population based randomised controlled trial of ultrasound screening, with intention to treat analysis of age standardised mortality.

SETTING

Community based screening programme in Western Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

41,000 men aged 65-83 years randomised to intervention and control groups.

INTERVENTION

Invitation to ultrasound screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Deaths from abdominal aortic aneurysm in the five years after the start of screening.

RESULTS

The corrected response to invitation to screening was 70%. The crude prevalence was 7.2% for aortic diameter > or = 30 mm and 0.5% for diameter > or = 55 mm. Twice as many men in the intervention group than in the control group underwent elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (107 v 54, P = 0.002, chi2 test). Between scheduled screening and the end of follow up 18 men in the intervention group and 25 in the control group died from abdominal aortic aneurysm, yielding a mortality ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.11). Any benefit was almost entirely in men aged between 65 and 75 years, where the ratio was reduced to 0.19 (0.04 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

At a whole population level screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms was not effective in men aged 65-83 years and did not reduce overall death rates. The success of screening depends on choice of target age group and the exclusion of ineligible men. It is also important to assess the current rate of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm as in some communities this may already approach a level that reduces the potential benefit of population based screening.

Indications for operative management of abdominal aortic aneurysms

The increasing incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms, along with the more frequent use of screening techniques, has resulted in greater numbers of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The questions of frequency of surveillance and timing of intervention are the two most controversial issues faced by surgeons dealing with this condition. Most management decisions are based on the size of the aneurysm but other factors must also be considered. This review makes recommendations on the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms according to the current available evidence.

In-hospital mortality from abdominal aortic surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: Vascular Anaesthesia Society audit

Background

The mortality rate associated with elective aortic aneurysm repair is widely assumed to be in the region of 5 per cent. This figure does not take into consideration the effect of pre-existing risk factors. The Vascular Anaesthesia Society of Great Britain and Ireland conducted a large audit to estimate the in-hospital mortality rate associated with non-emergency infrarenal aortic surgery throughout the British Isles, and to determine the influence of risk factors on mortality rate.

Methods

This was a multicentre, prospective audit of 177 hospitals throughout the UK and Ireland. Data were collected by questionnaire to include all patients undergoing elective or urgent surgery for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm or aortoiliac occlusive disease over 4 months.

Results

Nine hundred and thirty-three patients were recruited into the audit. The overall mortality rate was 7·3 per cent. Factors increasing the risk of death by up to fivefold included age over 74 years, urgent surgery, operation for occlusive disease, limited exercise capacity, a history of severe angina or cardiac failure, the presence of ventricular ectopics and abnormalities suggesting ischaemic heart disease on electrocardiography.

Conclusion

Although the in-hospital mortality rate was similar to previously published figures, the rate increased considerably when commonly encountered risk factors were present.

Endovascular repair of acute AAAs under local anesthesia with bifurcated endografts: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

To evaluate endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) under local anesthesia in the acute setting.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2001, 47 patients with an acute AAA were evaluated for endovascular repair after informed consent, provided they were in a stable, albeit hypotensive condition. The patients underwent urgent computed tomography to assess suitability for endovascular repair; 16 were eligible for stent-graft repair: 9 were frank ruptures and 7 were symptomatic aneurysms. Complications and outcome of endovascular repair were evaluated; mortality was compared to a contemporaneous surgical cohort.

RESULTS

Seven (23%) of 31 patients having a standard surgical procedure died in the study period compared to 1 (6%) of 16 patients undergoing endovascular repair (following conversion to surgery because of calcified access vessels). Twelve (75%) of the endovascular repairs were performed under local anesthesia; no complications with this mode of anesthesia were encountered. The median duration of the endovascular procedures was 110 minutes (range 75-240); median blood loss was 250 mL (range 100-2800 mL). Only 4 patients required blood transfusion, and only 8 patients required admission to the intensive care unit. There were 3 postoperative complications (1 ischemic colitis, 1 renal failure, 1 groin hematoma). During follow-up, 3 endograft patients received stent-graft extensions in uneventful procedures. Two patients died at 9 and 16 months from cardiac causes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility and possible advantages of endovascular repair under local anesthesia in selected acute AAA patients. Further studies are needed to prove the advantages over open repair.

Initial results of ultrasound screening for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in Western Australia: relevance for endoluminal treatment of aneurysm disease

BACKGROUND

Increased life expectancy in men during the last thirty years is largely due to the decrease in mortality from cardiovascular disease in the age group 29--69 yr. This change has resulted in a change in the disease profile of the population with conditions such as aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) becoming more prevalent. The advent of endoluminal treatment for AAA has encouraged prophylactic intervention and fueled the argument to screen for the disease. The feasibility of inserting an endoluminal graft is dependent on the morphology and growth characteristics of the aneurysm. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for AAA in men aged 65--83 yr in Western Australia for the purpose of determining the norms of the living anatomy in the pressurized infrarenal aorta.

AIMS

To examine (1) the diameters of the infra-renal aorta in aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal cases, (2) the implications for treatment modalities, with particular reference to endoluminal grafting, which is most dependent on normal and aneurysmal morphology, and (3) any evidence to support the notion that northern Europeans are predisposed to aneurysmal disease.

METHODS

Using ultrasound, a randomized control trial was established in Western Australia to assess the value of a screening program in males aged 65--83 yr. The infra-renal aorta was defined as aneurysmal if the maximum diameter was 30 mm or more. Aortic diameter was modelled both as a continuous (in mm) and as a binary outcome variable, for those men who had an infra-renal diameter of 30 mm or more. ANOVA and linear regression were used for modelling aortic diameter as a continuum, while chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used in comparing men with and without the diagnosis of AAA.

FINDINGS

By December 1998, of 19,583 men had been invited to undergo ultrasound screening for AAA, 12,203 accepted the invitation (corrected response fraction 70.8%). The prevalence of AAA increased with age from 4.8% at 65 yr to 10.8% at 80 yr (chi(2)=77.9, df=3, P<0.001). The median (IQR) diameter for the non-aneurysmal group was 21.4 mm (3.3 mm) and there was an increase (chi(2)=76.0, df=1, P<0.001) in the diameter of the infra-renal aorta with age. Since 27 mm is the 95th centile for the non-aneurysmal infra-renal aorta, a diameter of 30 mm or more is justified as defining an aneurysm. The risk of AAA was higher in men of Australian (OR=1.0) and northern European origin (OR=1.0, 95%CL: 0.9, 1.2) compared with those of Mediterranean origin (OR=0.5, 95%CL: 0.4, 0.7).

CONCLUSION

Although screening has not yet been shown to reduce mortality from AAA, these population-based data assist the understanding of aneurysmal disease and the further development and use of endoluminal grafts for this condition.