Remifentanil for sedation and analgesia in a preterm neonate with respiratory distress syndrome

Sedation of newborn infants for the INSURE procedure, are we sure?

Background. Neonatal intubation is a stressful procedure that requires premedication to improve intubation conditions and reduce stress and adverse physiological responses. Premedication used during the INSURE (INtubation, SURfactant therapy, Extubation) procedure should have a very short duration of action with restoration of spontaneous breathing within a few minutes. Aims. To determine the best sedative for intubation during the INSURE procedure by systematic review of the literature. Methods. We reviewed all relevant studies reporting on premedication, distress, and time to restoration of spontaneous breathing during the INSURE procedure. Results. This review included 12 studies: two relatively small studies explicitly evaluated the effect of premedication (propofol and remifentanil) during the INSURE procedure, both showing good intubation conditions and an average extubation time of about 20 minutes. Ten studies reporting on fentanyl or morphine provided insufficient information about these items. Conclusions. Too little is known in the literature to draw a solid conclusion on which premedication could be best used during the INSURE procedure. Both remifentanil and propofol are suitable candidates but dose-finding studies to detect effective nontoxic doses in newborns with different gestational ages are necessary.

Sedation and analgesia to facilitate mechanical ventilation

Regardless of age, health care professionals have a professional and ethical obligation to provide safe and effective analgesia to patients undergoing painful procedures. Historically, newborns, particularly premature and sick infants, have been undertreated for pain. Intubation of the trachea and mechanical ventilation are ubiquitous painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit that are poorly assessed and treated. The authors review the use of sedation and analgesia to facilitate endotracheal tube placement and mechanical ventilation. Controversies regarding possible adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes after sedative and anesthetic exposure and in the failure to treat pain is also discussed.

Remifentanil/midazolam versus fentanyl/midazolam for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Common opioids for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated infants may tend to accumulate and cause prolonged sedation with an unpredictable extubation time. Remifentanil is a promising option due to its unique pharmacokinetic properties, which seem to be valid in adults as well as in infants.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants (<60 days) received either a remifentanil or fentanyl-based analgesia and sedation regimen with low dose midazolam. The primary endpoint of the trial was the extubation time following discontinuation of the opioid infusion. Secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety aspects.

RESULTS

Between November 2006 and March 2010, we screened 431 mechanically ventilated infants for eligibility. The intention to treat group included 23 infants who were assigned to receive either remifentanil (n = 11) or fentanyl (n = 12). Although this was designed as a pilot study, median extubation time was significantly shorter in the remifentanil group (80.0 min, IQR = 15.0-165.0) compared to the fentanyl group (782.5 min, IQR = 250.8-1,875.0) (p = 0.005). Remifentanil and fentanyl provided comparable efficacy with more than two-thirds of the measurements indicating optimal analgesia and sedation (66.4 and 70.2 %, respectively; p = 0.743). Overall, both groups had good hemodynamic stability and a comparably low incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

As neonates and young infants have a decreased metabolism of common opioids like fentanyl and are more prone to respiratory depression, remifentanil could be the ideal opioid for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated infants.

Anesthesia and analgesia in the NICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. A stepwise approach to treatment should include pain recognition, assessment, and treatment, starting with nonpharmacologic and progressing to pharmacologic methods for increasing pain. The most common nonpharmacologic techniques include nonnutritive sucking with and without sucrose, kangaroo care, swaddling, and massage therapy. Drugs used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs are discussed. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Experience of remifentanil in extremely low-birth-weight babies undergoing laparotomy

Premature babies experience pain and require adequate analgesia for any painful procedure. Fentanyl and morphine resulted in safe and effective anesthesia in the past; however, their pharmacokinetics may be impaired in preterm babies with multiorgan failure. Remifentanil, despite the absence of available pharmacokinetic data in preterm infants and few reports in newborns, demonstrated its advantages in children undergoing either major surgery or minor painful procedures and has been shown to be useful even in neonates, because its elimination is independent of organ function. We report two cases of babies born at 26 weeks' and 27 weeks' gestation, weighing 580 g and 400 g, respectively, undergoing laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis. Both received midazolam bolus and remifentanil infusion at high doses. This technique seems to be an advantageous alternative even in extremely low-birth-weight prematures. Furthermore, it becomes a technique of choice in these babies because the available ventilators are often not equipped with halogenated vaporizers. Particularly in intensive care, where there are no scavenger systems, it could allow to operate without moving out the preterm babies and avoiding stress and hypothermia.

Remifentanil in neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia practice

Remifentanil is a relatively new ultrashort action synthetic opioid. Studies on the use of remifentanil in neonatology have emerged demonstrating its effectiveness and safety in neonates. The present study describes the use of remifentanil in both full-term and premature newborns, highlighting the theoretical benefits for this population in terms of both neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia. A Medline search was undertaken of all reviews and reports about the use of remifentanil in neonates published between 1996 and 2009 using MeSH search terms 'remifentanil', 'analgesia', 'anaesthesia', 'newborn' and 'neonate'. The review points that remifentanil has been used with advantages in newborns including preterm neonates and even for foetal anaesthesia. It proved to be a good option to attenuate the hemodynamic/endocrine markers of stress related to surgery. Owing to its unique pharmacokinetic profile, shorter extubation times can be achieved what makes the drug also a good option for short duration invasive procedures in NICUs (InSurE). A concern on its use is that the hemodynamic response (hypotension) may become significant when the drug is associated to other drugs like sevoflurane.

CONCLUSION

Remifentanil seems to be an effective and safely used opioid for neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia practice.

Drugs of choice for sedation and analgesia in the neonatal ICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal ICU are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. The drugs most commonly used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. This article discusses the indications for and advantages and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Drugs of choice for sedation and analgesia in the neonatal ICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal ICU are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. The drugs most commonly used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. This article discusses the indications for and advantages and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Early awakening and extubation with remifentanil in ventilated premature neonates

BACKGROUND

Morphine is one of the most commonly used drugs for sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, but its pharmacological profile has limitations, such as prolonged duration of action, especially in premature neonates. Because of its very short context-sensitive half-time, remifentanil has rapid onset and quickly decreases in plasma concentration after interrupting administration. The aim of the present study was to compare a continuous infusion of remifentanil and morphine during mechanical ventilation of premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

Twenty premature neonates (28-34 weeks) with RDS were randomized in a prospective double-blinded study to receive either a continuous infusion of morphine (n = 10) or remifentanil (n = 10) for mechanical ventilation. The length of time to awaken and extubate the neonate after interrupting opioid administration was recorded. We also recorded stress (COMFORT scale), pain response [Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS)], hemodynamic and ventilatory variables as well as adverse effects secondary to infusion of the specific opioid.

RESULTS

After terminating infusion, the length of time required to awaken and extubate the neonates was 18.9- and 12.1-fold longer, respectively, in the morphine group than in the remifentanil group. Both groups produced good quality sedation and analgesia as evaluated by the NIPS and COMFORT scores. No major side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show an interesting potential for the use of remifentanil in premature neonates. Remifentanil allowed an adequate level of sedation and analgesia as well as rapid recovery after discontinuation. However, further properly designed clinical trials are needed before it can be generally recommended.

Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates

A double-blind, randomised controlled study was conducted to evaluate the intubation conditions in 20 preterm neonates following the use of either morphine or remifentanil as premedication. The findings suggest that the overall intubation conditions were significantly better (p=0.0034) in the remifentanil group than in the morphine group. No severe complications were observed in either group.

Experience with remifentanil in neonates and infants

Remifentanil is a relatively new synthetic opioid, which is not licensed worldwide for neonates and infants. Because of its unique pharmacokinetic properties with a short recovery profile, it could be the ideal opioid for neonates and infants, who are especially sensitive to respiratory depression by opioids. Therefore, we conducted a MEDLINE search on all articles dealing with the use of remifentanil in this important subgroup of patients. Most experience with remifentanil in neonates and infants is as maintenance anaesthesia during surgery. In approximately 300 neonates and infants, remifentanil proved to be an effective and safely used opioid for this indication. However, very limited data exist on remifentanil for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated paediatric intensive care patients. Further research with remifentanil in neonates and infants should focus on this group of patients because remifentanil, with its very short context-sensitive half-life, could result in shorter extubation times compared with commonly used opioids such as morphine or fentanyl.