Maturational pharmacokinetics of single intravenous bolus of propofol

Development and Evaluation of Ontogeny Functions of the Major UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes to Underwrite Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Pediatric Populations

Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) demonstrate variable expression in the pediatric population. Thus, understanding of age-dependent maturation of UGTs is critical for accurate pediatric pharmacokinetics (PK) prediction of drugs that are susceptible for glucuronidation. Ontogeny functions of major UGTs have been previously developed and reported. However, those ontogeny functions are based on in vitro data (i.e., enzyme abundance, in vitro substrate activity, and so on) and therefore, may not translate to in vivo maturation of UGTs in the clinical setting. This report describes meta-analysis of the literature to develop and compare ontogeny functions for 8 primary UGTs (UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17) based on published in vitro and in vivo studies. Once integrated with physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling models, in vivo activity-based ontogeny functions demonstrated somewhat greater prediction accuracy (mean squared error, MSE: 0.05) compared to in vitro activity (MSE: 0.104) and in vitro abundance-based ontogeny functions (MSE: 0.129).

Challenges of pediatric pharmacotherapy: A narrative review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics

PURPOSE

Personalized pharmacotherapy, including for the pediatric population, provides optimal treatment and has emerged as a major trend owing to advanced drug therapeutics and diversified drug selection. However, it is essential to understand the growth and developmental characteristics of this population to provide appropriate drug therapy. In recent years, clinical pharmacogenetics has accumulated knowledge in pediatric pharmacotherapy, and guidelines from professional organizations, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, can be consulted to determine the efficacy of specific drugs and the risk of adverse effects. However, the existence of a large knowledge gap hinders the use of these findings in clinical practice.

METHODS

We provide a narrative review of the knowledge gaps in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in the pediatric population, focusing on the differences from the perspective of growth and developmental characteristics. In addition, we explored PK/PD in relation to pediatric clinical pharmacogenetics.

RESULTS

The lack of direct and indirect biomarkers for more accurate assessment of the effects of drug administration limits the current knowledge of PD. In addition, incorporating pharmacogenetic insights as pivotal covariates is indispensable in this comprehensive synthesis for precision therapy; therefore, we have provided recommendations regarding the current status and challenges of personalized pediatric pharmacotherapy. The integration of clinical pharmacogenetics with the health care system and institution of educational programs for health care providers is necessary for its safe and effective implementation. A comprehensive understanding of the physiological and genetic complexities of the pediatric population will facilitate the development of effective and personalized pharmacotherapeutic strategies.

Predicting Volume of Distribution in Neonates: Performance of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling

The volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) in neonates is still often estimated through isometric scaling from adult values, disregarding developmental changes beyond body weight. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Vss prediction methods in neonates (Poulin & Theil with Berezhkovskiy correction (P&T+) and Rodgers & Rowland (R&R)) with isometrical scaling. PBPK models were developed for 24 drugs using in-vitro and in-silico data. Simulations were done in Simcyp (V22) using predefined populations. Clinical data from 86 studies in neonates (including preterms) were used for comparison, and accuracy was assessed using (absolute) average fold errors ((A)AFEs). Isometric scaling resulted in underestimated Vss values in neonates (AFE: 0.61), and both PBPK methods reduced the magnitude of underprediction (AFE: 0.82-0.83). The P&T+ method demonstrated superior overall accuracy compared to isometric scaling (AAFE of 1.68 and 1.77, respectively), while the R&R method exhibited lower overall accuracy (AAFE: 2.03). Drug characteristics (LogP and ionization type) and inclusion of preterm neonates did not significantly impact the magnitude of error associated with isometric scaling or PBPK modeling. These results highlight both the limitations and the applicability of PBPK methods for the prediction of Vss in the absence of clinical data.

The Impact of Low Cardiac Output on Propofol Pharmacokinetics across Age Groups-An Investigation Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling

BACKGROUND

pathophysiological changes such as low cardiac output (LCO) impact pharmacokinetics, but its extent may be different throughout pediatrics compared to adults. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling enables further exploration.

METHODS

A validated propofol model was used to simulate the impact of LCO on propofol clearance across age groups using the PBPK platform, Simcyp^® (version 19). The hepatic and renal extraction ratio of propofol was then determined in all age groups. Subsequently, manual infusion dose explorations were conducted under LCO conditions, targeting a 3 µg/mL (80-125%) propofol concentration range.

RESULTS

Both hepatic and renal extraction ratios increased from neonates, infants, children to adolescents and adults. The relative change in clearance following CO reductions increased with age, with the least impact of LCO in neonates. The predicted concentration remained within the 3 µg/mL (80-125%) range under normal CO and LCO (up to 30%) conditions in all age groups. When CO was reduced by 40-50%, a dose reduction of 15% is warranted in neonates, infants and children, and 25% in adolescents and adults.

CONCLUSIONS

PBPK-driven, the impact of reduced CO on propofol clearance is predicted to be age-dependent, and proportionally greater in adults. Consequently, age group-specific dose reductions for propofol are required in LCO conditions.

Premedication before laryngoscopy in neonates: Evidence-based statement from the French society of neonatology (SFN)

CONTEXT

Laryngoscopy is frequently required in neonatal intensive care. Awake laryngoscopy has deleterious effects but practice remains heterogeneous regarding premedication use. The goal of this statement was to provide evidence-based good practice guidance for clinicians regarding premedication before tracheal intubation, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and laryngeal mask insertion in neonates.

METHODS

A group of experts brought together by the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) addressed 4 fields related to premedication before upper airway access in neonates: (1) tracheal intubation; (2) less invasive surfactant administration; (3) laryngeal mask insertion; (4) use of atropine for the 3 previous procedures. Evidence was gathered and assessed on predefined questions related to these fields. Consensual statements were issued using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Among the 15 formalized good practice statements, 2 were strong recommendations to do (Grade 1+) or not to do (Grade 1-), and 4 were discretionary recommendations to do (Grade 2+). For 9 good practice statements, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert opinion. For tracheal intubation premedication was considered mandatory except for life-threatening situations (Grade 1+). Recommended premedications were a combination of opioid + muscle blocker (Grade 2+) or propofol in the absence of hemodynamic compromise or hypotension (Grade 2+) while the use of a sole opioid was discouraged (Grade 1-). Statements regarding other molecules before tracheal intubation were expert opinions. For LISA premedication was recommended (Grade 2+) with the use of propofol (Grade 2+). Statements regarding other molecules before LISA were expert opinions. For laryngeal mask insertion and atropine use, no specific data was found and expert opinions were provided.

CONCLUSION

This statement should help clinical decision regarding premedication before neonatal upper airway access and favor standardization of practices.

Propofol for endotracheal intubation in neonates: a dose-finding trial

OBJECTIVE

To find propofol doses providing effective sedation without side effects in neonates of different gestational ages (GA) and postnatal ages (PNA).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective multicentere dose-finding study in 3 neonatal intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Neonates with a PNA <28 days requiring non-emergency endotracheal intubation.

INTERVENTIONS

Neonates were stratified into 8 groups based on GA and PNA. The first 5 neonates in every group received a dose of 1.0 mg/kg propofol. Based on sedative effect and side effects, the dose was increased or decreased in the next 5 patients until the optimal dose was found.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the optimal single propofol starting dose that provides effective sedation without side effects in each age group.

RESULTS

After inclusion of 91 patients, the study was prematurely terminated because the primary outcome was only reached in 13% of patients. Dose-finding was completed in 2 groups, but no optimal propofol dose was found. Effective sedation without side effects was achieved more often after a starting dose of 2.0 mg/kg (28%) than after 1.0 mg/kg (3%) and 1.5 mg/kg (9%). Propofol-induced hypotension occurred in 59% of patients. Logistic regression analyses showed that GA and PNA did not predict effective sedation or the occurrence of hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective sedation without side effects is difficult to achieve with propofol and the optimal dose in different age groups of neonates could not be determined. The sedative effect of propofol and the occurrence of hypotension are unpredictable and show large inter-individual variability in the neonatal population.

Volatiles or TIVA: Which is the standard of care for pediatric airway procedures? A pro-con discussion

Anesthesia for pediatric airway procedures constitutes a true art form that requires training and experience. Communication between anesthetist and surgeon to establish procedure goals is essential in determining the most appropriate anesthetic management. But does the mode of anesthesia have an impact? Traditionally, inhalational anesthesia was the most common anesthesia technique used during airway surgery. Introduction of agents used for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) such as propofol, short-acting opioids, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine has driven change in practice. Ongoing debates abound as to the advantages and disadvantages of volatile-based anesthesia versus TIVA. This pro-con discussion examines both volatiles and TIVA, from the perspective of effectiveness, safety, cost, and environmental impact, in an endeavor to justify which technique is the best specifically for pediatric airway procedures.

Neonatal pharmacology and clinical implications

During the neonatal period, there is physiological immaturity of organs, systems and metabolic pathways that influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of administered drugs, the dosage of which should be constantly amended, considering the progressive increase in weight and the maturation of the elimination pathways. In this article, we analyse the main pharmacokinetic aspects (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) that exist during the neonatal period, to offer a description of the physiological background for variability in pharmacological dosing.

A sensitive liquid chromatography method for analysis of propofol in small volumes of neonatal blood

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sampling volumes of blood from neonates is necessarily limited. However, most of the published propofol analysis assays require a relatively large blood sample volume (typically ≥0.5 mL). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a sensitive method requiring a smaller sample volume (0.2 mL) to fulfill clinically relevant research requirements.

METHODS

Following simple protein precipitation and centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into the HPLC-fluorescence system and separated with a reverse phase column. Propofol and the internal standard (thymol) were detected and quantified using fluorescence at excitation and emission wavelengths of 270 nm and 310 nm, respectively. The method was validated with reference to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry. Accuracy (CV, %) and precision (RSD, %) were evaluated at three quality control concentration levels (0.05, 0.5 and 5 µg/mL).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Calibration curves were linear in the range of 0.005-20 µg/mL. Intra- and interday accuracy (-4.4%-13.6%) and precision (0.2%-5.8%) for propofol were below 15%. The calculated LOD (limit of detection) and LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) were 0.0021 µg/mL and 0.0069 µg/mL, respectively. Propofol samples were stable for 4 months at -20°C after the sample preparation. This method was applied for analyzing blood samples from 41 neonates that received propofol, as part of a dose-finding study. The measured median (range) concentration was 0.14 (0.03-1.11) µg/mL, which was in the range of the calibration curve. The calculated median (range) propofol half-life of the gamma elimination phase was 10.4 (4.7-26.7) hours.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A minimal volume (0.2 mL) of blood from neonates is required for the determination of propofol with this method. The method can be used to support the quantification of propofol drug concentrations for pharmacokinetic studies in the neonatal population.

A manual propofol infusion regimen for neonates and infants

AIMS

Manual propofol infusion regimens for neonates and infants have been determined from clinical observations in children under the age of 3 years undergoing anesthesia. We assessed the performance of these regimens using reported age-specific pharmacokinetic parameters for propofol. Where performance was poor, we propose alternative dosing regimens.

METHODS

Simulations using a reported general purpose pharmacokinetic propofol model were used to predict propofol blood plasma concentrations during manual infusion regimens recommended for children 0-3 years. Simulated steady state concentrations were 6-8 µg.mL^-1 in the first 30 minutes that were not sustained during 100 minutes infusions. Pooled clinical data (n = 161, 1902 plasma concentrations) were used to determine an alternative pharmacokinetic parameter set for propofol using nonlinear mixed effects models. A new manual infusion regimen for propofol that achieves a steady-state concentration of 3 µg.mL^-1 was determined using a heuristic approach.

RESULTS

A manual dosing regimen predicted to achieve steady-state plasma concentration of 3 µg.mL^-1 comprised a loading dose of 2 mg.kg^-1 followed by an infusion rate of 9 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 for the first 15 minutes, 7 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 15 to 30 minutes, 6 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 30 to 60 minutes, 5 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 1 to 2 hours in neonates (38-44 weeks postmenstrual age). Dose increased with age in those aged 1-2 years with a loading dose of 2.5 mg.kg^-1 followed by an infusion rate of 13 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 for the first 15 minutes, 12 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 15 to 30 minutes, 11 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 30 to 60 minutes, and 10 mg.kg^-1 .h^-1 from 1 to 2 hours.

CONCLUSION

Propofol clearance increases throughout infancy to reach 92% that reported in adults (1.93 L.min.70 kg^-1 ) by 6 months postnatal age and infusion regimens should reflect clearance maturation and be cognizant of adverse effects from concentrations greater than the target plasma concentration. Predicted concentrations using a published general purpose pharmacokinetic propofol model were similar to those determined using a new parameter set using richer neonatal and infant data.

Practicalities of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target-controlled Infusion in Children

Propofol administered in conjunction with an opioid such as remifentanil is used to provide total intravenous anesthesia for children. Drugs can be given as infusion controlled manually by the physician or as automated target-controlled infusion that targets plasma or effect site. Smart pumps programmed with pharmacokinetic parameter estimates administer drugs to a preset plasma concentration. A linking rate constant parameter (keo) allows estimation of effect site concentration. There are two parameter sets, named after the first author describing them, that are commonly used in pediatric target-controlled infusion for propofol (Absalom and Kataria) and one for remifentanil (Minto). Propofol validation studies suggest that these parameter estimates are satisfactory for the majority of children. Recommended target concentrations for both propofol and remifentanil depend on the type of surgery, the degree of surgical stimulation, the use of local anesthetic blocks, and the ventilatory status of the patient. The use of processed electroencephalographic monitoring is helpful in pediatric total intravenous anesthesia and target-controlled infusion anesthesia, particularly in the presence of neuromuscular blockade.

Intravenous Propofol Allows Fast Intubation in Neonates and Young Infants Undergoing Major Surgery

Aim of the study: In selected surgical neonates and infants, the rapidity of induction and intubation may represent an important factor for their safety. Propofol is an anesthetic characterized by a rapid onset and fast recovery time that may reduce time of anesthetic induction and improve post-anesthetic outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anesthesia induction in full-term neonates and young infants after propofol bolus administration. Methods: A retrospective case-control study including infants below 6 months of age, undergoing general anesthesia between 2011 and 2013, was carried out. Patients that received intravenous propofol bolus to induce anesthesia were compared to patients who received inhaled sevoflurane. Time to reach successful orotracheal intubation (OTI) was measured in seconds. The quality of OTI was defined as "excellent," "good," and "poor," based on established classification and was reported. Hemodynamic parameters as systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were collected before OTI (t0), at OTI (t1), and at spontaneous breathing recovery (t2). Main adverse effects were recorded for both groups. Results are median (IQ range) or prevalence; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 160 infants were enrolled in the study, 80 received propofol and 80 inhaled sevoflurane. Major surgery (involving organs in the thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic cavities) was performed in 64 and 54% of patients in the propofol and sevoflurane group, respectively (p = 0.07). Patients in the propofol group showed a shorter time for OTI [11.5 (4.0-65) vs. 360.0 (228.0-720.0) seconds, (p < 0.0001)]. No difference was found in the quality of OTI between the two groups. No significant complications were recorded in either group. Conclusions: Propofol is a safe and effective anesthetic in neonates and infants permitting rapid induction of anesthesia and rapid intubation, without negative impact on the quality of intubation and haemodynamic compromise.

The use of PBPK modeling across the pediatric age range using propofol as a case

The project SAFEPEDRUG aims to provide guidelines for drug research in children, based on bottom-up and top-down approaches. Propofol, one of the studied model compounds, was selected because it is extensively metabolized in liver and kidney, with an important role for the glucuronidation pathway. Besides, being a lipophilic molecule, it is distributed into fat tissues, from where it redistributes into the systemic circulation. In the past, both bottom-up (Physiologically based pharmacokinetic, PBPK) and top-down approaches (population pharmacokinetic, popPK) were applied to describe its pharmacokinetics (PK). In this work, a combination of the two was used to check their performance to describe PK in children and neonates (both term and preterm) using propofol as a case compound. First, in vitro data was generated in human liver microsomes and recombinant enzymes and used to develop an adult PBPK model in Simcyp^®. Activity adjustment factors (AAFs) were calculated to account for differences between in vitro and in vivo enzyme activity. Clinical data were analyzed using a 3-compartment model in NONMEM. These data were used to construct a retrograde PBPK model and for qualification of the PBPK models. Once an accurate in vivo clearance was obtained accounting for the contribution of the different metabolic pathways, the resulting PBPK models were challenged with new data for qualification. After that, the constructed adult PPBK model for propofol was extrapolated to the pediatric population. Both the default built-in and in vivo derived ontogeny functions were used to do so. The models were qualified by comparing their predicted PK parameters to published values, and by comparison of predicted concentration-time profiles to available clinical data. Clearance values were predicted well, especially when compared with values obtained from trials where long-term sampling was applied, whereas volume of distribution was lower compared to the most common popPK model predictions. Concentration-time profiles were predicted well up until and including the preterm neonatal population. In this work, it was thus shown that PBPK can be used to predict the PK up to and including the preterm neonatal population without the use of pediatric in vivo data. This work adds weight to the need for further development of PBPK models, especially regarding distribution modeling and the use of in vivo derived ontogeny functions.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models are used in target-controlled-infusion (TCI) systems to determine the optimal drug administration to achieve a desired target concentration in a central or effect-site compartment. Our aim was to develop a PK-PD model for propofol that can predict the bispectral index (BIS) for a broad population, suitable for TCI applications.

METHODS

Propofol PK data were obtained from 30 previously published studies, five of which also contained BIS observations. A PK-PD model was developed using NONMEM. Weight, age, post-menstrual age (PMA), height, sex, BMI, and presence/absence of concomitant anaesthetic drugs were explored as covariates. The predictive performance was measured across young children, children, adults, elderly, and high-BMI individuals, and in simulated TCI applications.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 433 propofol concentration and 28 639 BIS observations from 1033 individuals (672 males and 361 females) were analysed. The age range was from 27 weeks PMA to 88 yr, and the weight range was 0.68-160 kg. The final model uses age, PMA, weight, height, sex, and presence/absence of concomitant anaesthetic drugs as covariates. A 35-yr-old, 170 cm, 70 kg male (without concomitant anaesthetic drugs) has a V₁, V₂, V₃, CL, Q₂, Q₃, and k_e0 of 6.28, 25.5, 273 litres, 1.79, 1.75, 1.11 litres min^-1, and 0.146 min^-1, respectively. The propofol TCI administration using the model matches well with recommendations for all age groups considered for both anaesthesia and sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a PK-PD model to predict the propofol concentrations and BIS for broad, diverse population. This should be useful for TCI in anaesthesia and sedation.

Experience with the use of propofol for radiologic imaging in infants younger than 6 months of age

BACKGROUND

There is an increased risk associated with procedural sedation of infants younger than 6 months of age. The use of propofol for radiologic imaging of this age group is not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that adverse events are higher in the infant population receiving propofol for radiologic imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken of 304 infants younger than 6 months old who received propofol for procedural sedation from October 2012 to February 2015. Patient demographics, propofol dosing, sedation-related adverse events and interventions were collected. Serious adverse events were defined as laryngospasm, aspiration, the need for admission, cardiac arrest or death.

RESULTS

Procedural sedation for radiologic imaging was successful in 301/304 (99%) of infants using propofol. Of these 304 patients, 130 (42.8%) patients were female, and 240 of the 304 (79%) were between 3 and 6 months of age. The majority of patients (172/304 [56.6%]) were American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status Class II. There were 57 sedation-related, minor adverse events in 39 out of 304 (12.8%) patients. Thirteen of the 304 (4.3%) patients had 14 serious adverse events, with airway obstruction the most common. Eighty interventions were required in 56/304 (18.4%) patients. The most common interventions were continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in 25/304 patients (8.2%) and jaw thrust in 15/304 (4.9%). The median induction propofol dose was 4.7 mg/kg. A need for an increase in the propofol infusion rate during the procedure was noted in 162/304 (53.3%) infants. No significant predictors of sedation-related adverse events were detected.

CONCLUSION

Propofol can be used for radiologic imaging of infants younger than 6 months of age with a high success rate. Practitioners should be mindful of significantly higher dosing requirements and a higher incidence of airway events, which can be easily identified and managed by a team of experienced sedation providers.

Neonatal pain management: still in search for the Holy Grail

Inadequate pain management but also inappropriate use of analgesics in early infancy has negative effects on neurodevelopmental outcome. As a consequence, neonatal pain management is still in search for the Holy Grail. At best, effective pain management is based on prevention, assessment, and treatment followed by a re-assessment of the pain to determine if additional treatment is still necessary. Unfortunately, epidemiological observations suggest that neonates are undergoing painful procedures very frequently, unveiling the need for effective preventive, non-pharmacological strategies. In addition, assessment is still based on validated, multimodal, but subjective pain assessment tools. Finally, in neonatal intensive care units, there is a shift in clinical practices (e.g., shorter intubation and ventilation), and this necessitates the development and validation of new pharmacological treatment modalities. To illustrate this, a shift in the use of opioids to paracetamol has occurred and short-acting agents (remifentanil, propofol) are more commonly administered to neonates. In addition to these new modalities and as part of a more advanced approach of the developmental pharmacology of analgesics, pharmacogenetics also emerged as a tool for precision medicine in neonates. To assure further improvement of neonatal pain management the integration of pharmacogenetics with the usual covariates like weight, age and/or disease characteristics is needed.

Bispectral index under propofol anesthesia in children: a comparative randomized study between TIVA and TCI

BACKGROUND

In children, only a few studies have compared different modes of propofol infusion during a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil. The aim of this study was to compare Bispectral Index (BIS) profiles (percentage of time spent at adequate BIS values) between four modes of propofol infusion: titration of the infusion rate on clinical signs (TIVA0 ), titration of the infusion rate on the BIS (TIVABIS ), target controlled infusion (TCI) guided by the BIS either with the Kataria model (TCI KBIS ) or the Schnider model (TCI SBIS ).

METHODS

Sixty-six children (aged from 4 to 14 years) were prospectively randomized into one of the four groups. In the TIVA0 group, the anesthesiologist was blinded to the BIS. In each group, the percentage of time with adequate BIS values (45-55), the bias, and imprecision were calculated.

RESULTS

The propofol consumption was similar in the four groups. During the maintenance phase, the percentage of time spent in the targeted BIS range was significantly lower in the TIVA0 group compared to the three other groups (TIVA0 : 31% ± 22, TIVABIS : 59% ± 17, TCI KBIS : 53% ± 12, TCI SBIS : 56% ± 17). The bias was not statistically different between the four groups, but the imprecision was larger for the TIVA0 group. Compared to the Kataria model, the Schnider model was associated with shorter time delay to reach the desired BIS, to eyes opening, and to tracheal extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol administration using manual infusion guided by clinical signs was associated with higher risks of over- or underdosage when compared to BIS-guided administrations. When propofol infusion was guided by the BIS, no major difference was found between TIVA and TCI (either with the Kataria or the Schnider model). This study highlights the need of a pharmacodynamic feedback during propofol anesthesia in children.

Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation

Propofol is an intravenous agent used commonly for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, procedural, and critical care sedation in children. The mechanisms of action on the central nervous system involve interactions at various neurotransmitter receptors, especially the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor. Approved for use in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration in 1989, its use for induction of anesthesia in children less than 3 years of age still remains off-label. Despite its wide use in pediatric anesthesia, there is conflicting literature about its safety and serious adverse effects in particular subsets of children. Particularly as children are not "little adults", in this review, we emphasize the maturational aspects of propofol pharmacokinetics. Despite the myriad of propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies and the ability to use allometrical scaling to smooth out differences due to size and age, there is no optimal model that can be used in target controlled infusion pumps for providing closed loop total intravenous anesthesia in children. As the commercial formulation of propofol is a nutrient-rich emulsion, the risk for bacterial contamination exists despite the Food and Drug Administration mandating addition of antimicrobial preservative, calling for manufacturers' directions to discard open vials after 6 h. While propofol has advantages over inhalation anesthesia such as less postoperative nausea and emergence delirium in children, pain on injection remains a problem even with newer formulations. Propofol is known to depress mitochondrial function by its action as an uncoupling agent in oxidative phosphorylation. This has implications for children with mitochondrial diseases and the occurrence of propofol-related infusion syndrome, a rare but seriously life-threatening complication of propofol. At the time of this review, there is no direct evidence in humans for propofol-induced neurotoxicity to the infant brain; however, current concerns of neuroapoptosis in developing brains induced by propofol persist and continue to be a focus of research.

Total intravenous anesthesia will supercede inhalational anesthesia in pediatric anesthetic practice

Inhalational anesthesia has dominated the practice of pediatric anesthesia. However, as the introduction of agents such as propofol, short-acting opioids, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine a monumental change has occurred. With increasing use, the overwhelming advantages of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have emerged and driven change in practice. These advantages, outlined in this review, will justify why TIVA will supercede inhalational anesthesia in future pediatric anesthetic practice.

The allometric exponent for scaling clearance varies with age: a study on seven propofol datasets ranging from preterm neonates to adults

AIM

For scaling clearance between adults and children, allometric scaling with a fixed exponent of 0.75 is often applied. In this analysis, we performed a systematic study on the allometric exponent for scaling propofol clearance between two subpopulations selected from neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents and adults.

METHODS

Seven propofol studies were included in the analysis (neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents, adults1 and adults2). In a systematic manner, two out of the six study populations were selected resulting in 15 combined datasets. In addition, the data of the seven studies were regrouped into five age groups (FDA Guidance 1998), from which four combined datasets were prepared consisting of one paediatric age group and the adult group. In each of these 19 combined datasets, the allometric scaling exponent for clearance was estimated using population pharmacokinetic modelling (nonmem 7.2).

RESULTS

The allometric exponent for propofol clearance varied between 1.11 and 2.01 in cases where the neonate dataset was included. When two paediatric datasets were analyzed, the exponent varied between 0.2 and 2.01, while it varied between 0.56 and 0.81 when the adult population and a paediatric dataset except for neonates were selected. Scaling from adults to adolescents, children, infants and neonates resulted in exponents of 0.74, 0.70, 0.60 and 1.11 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For scaling clearance, ¾ allometric scaling may be of value for scaling between adults and adolescents or children, while it can neither be used for neonates nor for two paediatric populations. For scaling to neonates an exponent between 1 and 2 was identified.

Neonatal clinical pharmacology

Effective and safe drug administration in neonates should be based on integrated knowledge on the evolving physiological characteristics of the infant who will receive the drug and the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a given drug. Consequently, clinical pharmacology in neonates is as dynamic and diverse as the neonates we admit to our units while covariates explaining the variability are at least as relevant as median estimates. The unique setting of neonatal clinical pharmacology will be highlighted based on the hazards of simple extrapolation of maturational drug clearance when only based on 'adult' metabolism (propofol, paracetamol). Second, maturational trends are not at the same pace for all maturational processes. This will be illustrated based on the differences between hepatic and renal maturation (tramadol, morphine, midazolam). Finally, pharmacogenetics should be tailored to neonates, not just mirror adult concepts. Because of this diversity, clinical research in the field of neonatal clinical pharmacology is urgently needed and facilitated through PK/PD modeling. In addition, irrespective of already available data to guide pharmacotherapy, pharmacovigilance is needed to recognize specific side effects. Consequently, pediatric anesthesiologists should consider to contribute to improved pharmacotherapy through clinical trial design and collaboration, as well as reporting on adverse effects of specific drugs.

A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid commonly used as an anesthetic and also increasingly popular as a sedative agent in neonates. Initial dosage regimens in this population are often empirically derived from adults on a body weight basis. However, ontogenic maturation processes related to drug disposition are not necessarily always body weight correlates. We developed a predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model that includes growth and maturation physiologic changes for fentanyl in neonatal care.

METHODS

Key pharmacokinetic variables and principles (protein binding, clearance, distribution) as related to fentanyl pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic behavior in adults (tricompartmental model) and to neonatal physiologic data (organ weights and blood flows, body composition, renal and hepatic function, etc.) were used to guide the building of a semi-physiologic ontogenic model. The model applies to a normal-term neonate without any other intervention. Then, extension to a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic link model for fentanyl was made. The final model was evaluated by predicting the time course of plasma concentrations and the effect of a standard regimen of 10.5 μg/kg over a 1-h period followed by 1.5 μg/kg/h for 48 h.

RESULTS

Hepatic clearance was linked to ontogeny of unbound fraction and of α1-acid glycoprotein. All parameters were reduced in the neonate compared to adults but in a differing proportion due to qualitative changes in physiology that are analyzed and accounted for. Systemic clearance (CLS), volume of the central compartment (V1) and steady-state volume of distribution predicted by the model were 0.028 L/min, 1.26 L, and 22.04 L, respectively. Weight-corrected parameters generally decreased in adults compared with neonates, but differentially, e.g., CLS = 0.0093 versus 0.0088 L/min/kg, while V1 = 0.42 versus 0.18 L/kg (neonates vs. adults). Under such complexity a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model is the appropriate method for rational efficacy targeting. Fentanyl pharmacodynamics in neonates were considered to be similar to those in adults except for the equilibrium rate constant, which was also scaled on an ontogenic basis. The model adequately predicted the reported mean expected concentration-time profiles for the standard regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling showed that the usually prescribed dosage regimens of fentanyl in neonates may not always provide the optimum degree of sedation. The model could be used in optimal design of clinical trials for this vulnerable population. Prospective clinical testing is the reasonable next step.

A pharmacokinetic standard for babies and adults

The pharmacokinetic behavior of medicines used in humans follows largely predictable patterns across the human age range from premature babies to elderly adults. Most of the differences associated with age are in fact due to differences in size. Additional considerations are required to describe the processes of maturation of clearance processes and postnatal changes in body composition. Application of standard approaches to reporting pharmacokinetic parameters is essential for comparative human pharmacokinetic studies from babies to adults. A standardized comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in children and adults is shown for 46 drugs. Appropriate size scaling shows that children (over 2 years old) are similar to adults. Maturation changes are generally completed within the first 2 years of postnatal life; consequently babies may be considered as immature children, whereas children are just small adults.

Is indirect hyperbilirubinemia a useful biomarker of reduced propofol clearance in neonates?

AIM

Large interindividual variability in neonatal propofol clearance is documented which, in part, can be explained by postmenstrual age (PMA) and postnatal age (PNA). We aimed to document whether indirect bilirubin, instead of or in addition to PNA, could improve predictability of propofol clearance and serve as a useful biomarker of reduced propofol clearance in neonates.

METHODS

Indirect serum bilirubin was introduced as a dichotomous or continuous variable (both age-normalized) in a previously developed three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, based on 235 concentration-time points obtained in 25 neonates after single bolus administration of propofol. For pharmacokinetic analysis, nonlinear mixed effect modeling 6.2 was used.

RESULTS

The covariates PMA and PNA explained 67% of the interindividual variability compared with 45% in the model with PMA and bilirubin.

CONCLUSION

Age, reflected by PMA and PNA, is a more relevant clinical predictor of neonatal propofol clearance compared with PMA and raised indirect hyperbilirubinemia.

Neonatal pharmacology: extensive interindividual variability despite limited size

Providing safe and effective drug therapy to neonates requires knowledge of the impact of development on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Although maturational changes are observed throughout childhood, they are most prominent during the first year of life. Several of these processes overlap, making development an extremely dynamic system in the newborn compared with that in infants, children, or adults. Changes in body composition and porportions, liver mass, metabolic activity, and renal function collectively affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of medications. Instead of simply adapting doses by scaling adult or pediatric doses on the basis of a patient's weight and/or body surface area, integrated knowledge of clinical maturation and developmental pharmacology is critical to the safe and effective use of medications in neonates. Unfortunately, the effects of human ontogeny on both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have not been well established in these early stages of life, and information regarding the influence of developmental changes on the pharmacodynamics of medications is even more limited. Theoretically, age-dependent variations in receptor number and affinity for drugs have significant potential to influence an individual's response to drug therapy. In this review, some of the relevant covariates of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in neonates are reviewed and illustrated based on the published literature.

Allometric or lean body mass scaling of propofol pharmacokinetics: towards simplifying parameter sets for target-controlled infusions

Uncertainty exists as to the most suitable pharmacokinetic parameter sets for propofol target-controlled infusions (TCI). The pharmacokinetic parameter sets currently employed are clearly not universally applicable, particularly when patient attributes differ from those of the subjects who participated in the original research from which the models were derived. Increasing evidence indicates that the pharmacokinetic parameters of propofol can be scaled allometrically as well as in direct proportion to lean body mass (LBM). Appraisal of hitherto published studies suggests that an allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic parameter set may be applicable to a wide range of patients ranging from children to obese adults. On the other hand, there is evidence that propofol pharmacokinetic parameters, scaled linearly to LBM, provide improved dosing in normal and obese adults. The 'Schnider' pharmacokinetic parameter set that has been programmed into commercially available TCI pumps cannot be employed at present for morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 kg/m2), because of anomalous behaviour of the equation used to calculate LBM, resulting in administration of excessive amounts of propofol. Simulations of TCI using improved equations to calculate LBM indicate that the Schnider model delivers similar amounts of propofol to morbidly obese patients as do the allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic parameter sets. These hypotheses deserve further investigation. To facilitate further investigation, researchers are encouraged to make their data freely available to the WorldSIVA Open TCI Initiative (http://opentci.org).

Prediction of drug clearance in children 3 months and younger: an allometric approach

BACKGROUND

Sometimes it might not be possible to conduct a pharmacokinetic (PK) study in neonates and infants. Under these circumstances, one would like to predict PK parameters in this age group. Because drug clearance is the most important PK parameter, the objective of this study was to describe an allometric method to predict drug clearance in children ≤3 months.

METHODS

In total, 43 drugs (107 observations) were randomly selected for this study. The age of the children ranged from 0 to 1 year. Children were divided into two groups: ≤3 months and ≥3 months to 1 year. Drug clearance (CL) in children was predicted using the following equation: CL in the child=adult CL×(weight of the child/70)(0.75 or 1.0 or 1.2).

RESULTS

The results of the study indicated that the exponent 1.2 performs better in the prediction of drug clearance than exponent 1.0 or 0.75 for children ≤3 months. By contrast, exponent 1.0 provided better prediction for children ≥3 months to 1 year than exponent 1.2. Exponent 0.75 provided the worst results leading to substantial prediction error in children 0-1 year (in many instances more than 1000% prediction error).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, it appears that exponent 1.2 is the best method out of three methods for reasonably accurate prediction of drug clearance in children ≤3 months old. However, exponent 1.2 will underpredict drug clearance in children older than 3 months. The suggested approach could be used to support the choice of the initial dose in clinical trials for children ≤3 months old.

Perinatal pharmacology: applications for neonatal neurology

The principles of clinical pharmacology also apply to neonates, but their characteristics warrant a tailored approach. We focus on aspects of both developmental pharmacokinetics (concentration/time relationship) and developmental pharmacodynamics (concentration/effect relationship) in neonates. We hereby aimed to link concepts used in clinical pharmacology with compound-specific observations (anti-epileptics, analgosedatives) in the field of neonatal neurology. Although in part anecdotal, we subsequently illustrate the relevance of developmental pharmacology in the field of neonatal neurology by a specific intervention (e.g. whole body cooling), specific clinical presentations (e.g. short and long term outcome following fetal exposure to antidepressive agents, the development of new biomarkers for fetal alcohol syndrome) and specific clinical needs (e.g. analgosedation in neonates, excitocytosis versus neuro-apoptosis/impaired synaptogenesis).

Performance evaluation of paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in healthy young children

BACKGROUND

The performance of eight currently available paediatric propofol pharmacokinetic models in target-controlled infusions (TCIs) was assessed, in healthy children from 3 to 26 months of age.

METHODS

Forty-one, ASA I-II children, aged 3-26 months were studied. After the induction of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil, a propofol bolus dose of 2.5 mg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 8 mg kg(-1) h(-1) was given. Arterial blood samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 min post-bolus, at the end of surgery, and at 1, 3, 5, 30, 60, and 120 min after stopping the infusion. Model performance was visually inspected with measured/predicted plots. Median performance error (MDPE) and the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) were calculated to measure bias and accuracy of each model.

RESULTS

Performance of the eight models tested differed markedly during the different stages of propofol administration. Most models underestimated propofol concentration 1 min after the bolus dose, suggesting an overestimation of the initial volume of distribution. Six of the eight models tested were within the accepted limits of performance (MDPE<20% and MDAPE<30%). The model derived by Short and colleagues performed best.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that six of the eight models tested perform well in young children. Since most models overestimate the initial volume of distribution, the use for TCI might result in the administration of larger bolus doses than necessary.

Persistent hiccups associated with epidural ropivacaine in a newborn

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of persistent hiccups associated with epidural ropivacaine in a newborn infant.

CASE SUMMARY

A term female infant (3.05 kg) received epidural ropivacaine for pain control during and after an operative procedure to correct a tracheoesophageal fistula. Three intermittent doses of ropivacaine were administered during the operative period (total dose 2.29 mg/kg) followed by a continuous epidural (caudal) infusion (0.1% ropivacaine; initial dose 0.23 mg/kg/h plus fentanyl 0.46 μg/kg/h). The infant was extubated in the recovery area and transferred to the intensive care unit. Within hours of transfer, she developed persistent hiccups. The epidural infusion was titrated for pain control, up to 0.32 mg/kg/h (ropivacaine). The hiccup frequency increased to every 10-30 seconds, with the patient appearing hypotonic with lip trembling and intermittent tongue fasciculation. An electroencephalogram did not show any epileptiform activity or focal features consistent with seizure activity. The epidural infusion was reduced to 0.26 mg/kg/h (ropivacaine), with dramatic improvement in hiccups and tone. The infusion was discontinued and complete resolution of hiccups was observed.

DISCUSSION

Ropivacaine is commonly used for infiltration anesthesia and peripheral and epidural block anesthesia. Use of the Naranjo probability scale determined that our patient's hiccups were probably caused by ropivacaine. To our knowledge, this is the first report of persistent hiccups associated with epidural ropivacaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider the potential of neurotoxicity, manifested as persistent hiccups, when epidural ropivacaine is administered to young infants.

A comparison of simple allometric and maturation models for the prediction of morphine clearance in pediatrics

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to predict morphine clearance in children (preterm neonates to 10-month-old infants) by maturation models that include age and weight and to compare the predictive performance of morphine maturation models with simple allometric models.

METHODS

Age, weight, and morphine clearance data were obtained from the literature. A maturation model (n=60) for morphine was developed using data from preterm and term neonates to 5-year-old children. The allometric models were developed using the same data as the maturation model. The predictive performance of the models was tested in 88 children of different age groups.

RESULTS

The maturation and allometric models predicted morphine clearance in children with the same degree of accuracy or error. Out of 88 subjects, the prediction error of 50% or less was observed in slightly >60% of the subjects. Almost 40% of the subjects showed a prediction error >50%, 20% of which showed an error ≥ 100%. Although both the maturation and allometric models provided a good prediction of morphine clearance in many children, they were less accurate for many others.

CONCLUSIONS

High intersubject variability in morphine clearance probably led to less than adequate performance of the models. However, there could be many drugs for which intersubject variability in clearance might not be as high as morphine clearance and in those situations these models could perform reasonably well.

Propofol for procedural sedation/anaesthesia in neonates

BACKGROUND

Elective medical or surgical procedures are commonplace for neonates admitted to NICU. Agents such as opioids are commonly used for achieving sedation/analgesia/anaesthesia for such procedures; however, these agents are associated with adverse effects. Propofol is used widely in paediatric and adult populations for this purpose. The efficacy and safety of the use of propofol in neonates has not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of propofol treatment compared to placebo or no treatment or alternate active agents in neonates undergoing sedation or anaesthesia for procedures. To conduct subgroup analyses according to method of propofol administration (bolus or continuous infusion), type of active control agent (neuromuscular blocking agents with or without the use of sedative, analgesics or anxiolytics), type of procedure (endotracheal intubation, eye examination, other procedure), and gestational age (preterm and term).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1950 to September 30, 2010), EMBASE (1980 to September 30, 2010) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2) for eligible studies without language restriction. We searched reference lists of identified articles and abstracts submitted to Pediatric Academic Societies (2002 to 2009), and international trials registries for eligible articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of propofol versus placebo, no treatment or other sedative/anaesthetic/analgesic agents in isolation or combination used in neonates for procedures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected and analysed data in accordance with the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

One open-label randomised controlled trial of 63 neonates was eligible for inclusion. Thirty-three neonates in the propofol group were compared to 30 infants in the morphine-atropine-suxamethonium group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infants who required multiple intubation attempts (39% in the propofol group versus 57% in the morphine-atropine-suxamethonium group; RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.29). Times required to prepare medication, to complete the procedure and for recovery to previous clinical status were shorter in the propofol group. No difference in clinically significant side effects was observed; however, the number of events was small.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No practice recommendation can be made based on the available evidence regarding the use of propofol in neonates. Further research is needed on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in neonates and once a relatively safe dose is identified, randomised controlled trials assessing the safety and efficacy of propofol are needed.

Tips and traps analyzing pediatric PK data

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling has elucidated aspects of developmental pharmacology of value to the anesthetic community. The increasing sophistication of modeling techniques is associated with pitfalls that may not be readily apparent to readers or investigators. While size and age are considered primary covariates for PK models, the impact of birth on clearance maturation is poorly documented, dose in obese children is poorly investigated, pharmacologic implications of physiologic changes poorly portrayed, disease progression on drug response poorly depicted and the impact of metabolites on effect poorly illustrated. This review identifies some of these pitfalls and suggests ideas to circumvent or investigate these hazards.

Knowledge-driven approaches for the guidance of first-in-children dosing

Pediatric pharmacokinetic and pediatric safety and efficacy studies are, in most cases, a mandatory activity during the drug development process in North America and Europe. Pharmacokinetic modeling in anticipation of the pediatric clinical trial should take a data or knowledge-driven approach by employing either top-down or bottom-up approaches to assessing differential age-related dosing. These two approaches depend on different starting information and are likely to be used in conjunction with each other for the purposes of defining pediatric dosing guidelines. This review primarily focuses on the available bottom-up, mechanistic models for predicting age-dependent drug absorption, distribution and elimination, and their integration through the whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. The bottom-up approach incorporating adult and pediatric whole-body PBPK models for optimizing age-related dosing is detailed for a drug currently undergoing pediatric development.

Developmental pharmacology of tramadol during infancy: ontogeny, pharmacogenetics and elimination clearance

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To illustrate the complex interaction between ontogeny, i.e., age-dependent maturation, genetic polymorphisms and renal elimination clearance during infancy, based on developmental disposition of intravenous tramadol during infancy.

BACKGROUND

Tramadol (M) is metabolized by O-demethylation (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 2D6) to the pharmacodynamic active metabolite O-demethyl tramadol (M1). This metabolite is subsequently eliminated by renal route while M1 formation will in part depend on ontogeny, i.e., age-dependent activity and CYP2D6 polymorphisms. However, these pathways do not mature simultaneously.

METHODS

A pooled pharmacokinetic analysis of earlier reported time-concentration profiles in neonates and infants was performed with subsequent simulation of the impact of ontogeny, polymorphisms and renal elimination clearance during infancy.

RESULTS

Tramadol plasma time-concentration profile changes with postmenstrual age. The highest metabolite concentrations occur in the 52-week infant, where M1 formation clearance (hepatic, CYP2D6) is already mature but metabolite elimination clearance (through glomerular filtration rate) is immature.

DISCUSSION

The phenotypic observations might in part explain unanticipated (side-)effects of tramadol. In addition to the compound-specific clinical implications, it is important to stress that the maturational trends in the elimination processes described can be considered for other compounds (e.g., codeine) that undergo similar elimination routes.

Propofol and children--what we know and what we do not know

The pharmacokinetics of propofol are relatively well described in the pediatric population. Recent work has confirmed the validity of allometric scaling for predicting propofol disposition across different species and for describing pediatric ontogenesis. In the first year of life, allometric models require adjustment to reflect ontogeny of maturation. Pharmacodynamic data for propofol in children are scarcer, because of practical difficulties in data collection and the limitations of currently available depth of anesthesia monitors for pediatric use. Hence, questions relating to the comparative sensitivity of children to propofol, and differences in time to peak effect relative to adults, remain unanswered. K(eo) half-lives have been determined for pediatric kinetic models using time to peak effect techniques but are not currently incorporated into commercially available target-controlled infusion pumps.