1
|
Yilmaz S, Gunter RL, Kanters AE, Rosen DR, Lipman JM, Holubar SD, Hull TL, Steele SR. Segmental Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:1048-1055. [PMID: 38653494 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is performed in select patients who may be at increased risk for postoperative morbidity. OBJECTIVE To identify patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent segmental colectomy and assess their postoperative and long-term outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective case series. SETTING A tertiary care IBD center. PATIENTS Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surgery between 1995 and 2022. INTERVENTION Segmental colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative complications, early and late colitis, metachronous cancer development, completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates, and stoma at follow-up. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were included (20 [36.4%] women; age 67.8 (57.4-77.1) years at surgery; BMI 27.7 (24.2-31.1) kg/m 2 ; median follow-up 37.3 months). Thirty-two patients (58.2%) had ASA score of 3, 48 (87.3%) had at least 1 comorbidity, and 48 (87.3%) had Mayo endoscopic subscores of 0 to 1. Patients underwent right hemicolectomy (n = 28; 50.9%), sigmoidectomy (n = 17; 30.9%), left hemicolectomy (6; 10.9%), low anterior resection (n = 2; 3.6%), or a nonanatomic resection (n = 2; 3.6%) for endoscopically unresectable polyps (n = 21; 38.2%), colorectal cancer (n = 15; 27.3%), symptomatic diverticular disease (n = 13; 23.6%), and stricture (n = 6; 10.9%). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (29.1%; n = 7 [12.7%] Clavien-Dindo class III-V). Early and late postoperative colitis rates were 9.1% and 14.5%, respectively. Metachronous cancer developed in 1 patient. Four patients (7.3%) underwent subsequent completion proctocolectomy with ileostomy. Six patients (10.9%) had a stoma at follow-up. Two- and 5-year completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates were 91% and 88%, respectively. LIMITATIONS Retrospective study and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is associated with low postoperative complication rates, symptomatic early colitis and late colitis rates, metachronous cancer development, and the need for subsequent completion proctocolectomy. Therefore, it can be safe to consider select patients, such as the elderly with quiescent colitis and other indications, for colectomy. See Video Abstract . COLECTOMA SEGMENTARIA EN LA COLITIS ULCEROSA ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se realiza en pacientes seleccionados que pueden tener un mayor riesgo de morbilidad posoperatoria.OBJETIVO:Identificar pacientes con colitis ulcerosa sometidos a colectomía segmentaria y evaluar sus resultados postoperatorios y a largo plazo.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.AMBIENTE:Un centro de atención terciaria para enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales.PACIENTES:Pacientes con colitis ulcerosa intervenidos quirúrgicamente entre 1995 y 2022.INTERVENCIÓN(S):Colectomía segmentaria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Complicaciones postoperatorias, colitis temprana y tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico, tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa y estoma en el seguimiento.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron cincuenta y cinco pacientes [20 (36,4%) mujeres; 67,8 (57,4-77,1) años de edad al momento de la cirugía; índice de masa corporal 27,7 (24,2-31,1) kg/m2; mediana de seguimiento 37,3 meses]. La puntuación ASA fue III en 32 (58,2%) pacientes, 48 (87,3%) tenían al menos una comorbilidad y 48 (87,3%) tenían una subpuntuación endoscópica de Mayo de 0-1. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a hemicolectomía derecha (28, 50,9%), sigmoidectomía (17, 30,9%), hemicolectomía izquierda (6, 10,9%), resección anterior baja (2, 3,6%) o resección no anatómica (2, 3,6%) para; pólipos irresecables endoscópicamente (21, 38,2%), cáncer colorrectal (15, 27,3%), enfermedad diverticular sintomática (13, 23,6%) y estenosis (6, 10,9%). Se produjeron complicaciones postoperatorias en 16 (29,1%) pacientes [7 (12,7%) Clavien-Dindo Clase III-V]. Las tasas de colitis posoperatoria temprana y tardía fueron del 9,1% y el 14,5%, respectivamente. Un paciente desarrolló cáncer metacrónico. A 4 (7,3%) pacientes se les realizó posteriormente proctocolectomía completa con ileostomía. Seis (10,9%) pacientes tenían estoma en el seguimiento. Las tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa a dos y cinco años fueron del 91% y 88%, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se asocia con bajas tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias, tasas de colitis sintomática temprana y tasas de colitis tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico y la necesidad de una posterior proctocolectomía completa. Por lo tanto, puede ser seguro considerar pacientes seleccionados, como los ancianos con colitis inactiva y otras indicaciones de colectomía. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shelygin YA, Ivashkin VT, Belousova EA, Reshetov IV, Maev IV, Achkasov SI, Abdulganieva DI, Alekseeva OA, Bakulin IG, Barysheva OY, Bolikhov KV, Vardanyan AV, Veselov AV, Veselov VV, Golovenko OV, Gubonina IV, Denisenko VL, Dolgushina AI, Kashnikov VN, Knyazev OV, Kostenko NV, Lakhin AV, Makarchuk PA, Moskalev AI, Nanaeva BA, Nikitin IG, Nikitina NV, Odintsova AK, Omelyanovskiy VV, Оshchepkov AV, Pavlenko VV, Poluektova EA, Sitkin SI, Sushkov OI, Tarasova LV, Tkachev AV, Тimerbulatov VM, Uspenskaya YB, Frolov SA, Khlynova OV, Chashkova EY, Chesnokova OV, Shapina MV, Sheptulin AA, Shifrin OS, Shkurko TV, Shchukina OB. Ulcerative colitis (K51), adults. KOLOPROKTOLOGIA 2023; 22:10-44. [DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-1-10-44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu. A. Shelygin
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continous Professional Education
| | - V. T. Ivashkin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - I. V. Reshetov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - I. V. Maev
- Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov
| | - S. I. Achkasov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continous Professional Education
| | | | | | - I. G. Bakulin
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
| | | | | | | | | | - V. V. Veselov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continous Professional Education
| | - O. V. Golovenko
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continous Professional Education
| | | | - V. L. Denisenko
- Educational Establishment Vitebsk State Order of Peoples’ Friendship Medical University
| | - A. I. Dolgushina
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «South-Ural State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
| | | | - O. V. Knyazev
- GBUZ Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after Loginov MHD
| | - N. V. Kostenko
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Astrakhan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| | | | | | - A. I. Moskalev
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
| | - B. A. Nanaeva
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
| | - I. G. Nikitin
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
| | | | - A. Kh. Odintsova
- GAUZ «RCH» of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan
| | | | - A. V. Оshchepkov
- GBUZ SO «SOKB No. 1» of the Ministry of Health of the Sverdlovsk Region
| | | | - E. A. Poluektova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - S. I. Sitkin
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
| | - O. I. Sushkov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
| | - L. V. Tarasova
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov»
| | - A. V. Tkachev
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Rostov State Medical University» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| | | | | | - S. A. Frolov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
| | - O. V. Khlynova
- Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner (PSMU) of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Feaderation
| | - E. Yu. Chashkova
- Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Irkutsk Scientific Center for Surgery and Traumatology»
| | | | - M. V. Shapina
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continous Professional Education
| | - A. A. Sheptulin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - O. S. Shifrin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - T. V. Shkurko
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
| | - O. B. Shchukina
- First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov of the Ministry of Health of Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen SL, Faye AS, Chang S. Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Older Adult: a Review of Postoperative Outcomes and Pouchitis Treatment. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 20:564-581. [PMID: 36844648 PMCID: PMC9957085 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-022-00405-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the preferred surgical treatment for patients with medically refractive ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous studies have suggested that outcomes of this procedure may be worse in older patients; however, more recent reports have suggested that IPAA in select patients is safe, feasible, and results in good quality of life. In this review, we discuss the recent literature surrounding clinical considerations and treatment management of IPAA in older adults. RECENT FINDINGS IPAA complication rates and adverse events are similar in the older adult population, as compared to the younger adult patient population. Although fecal urgency and incontinence may be more common among older adults, chronological age alone is not a contraindication for IPAA surgery, as good quality of life can still be achieved. In this review, we will also discuss the development of pouchitis after IPAA, particularly among older adults, as the emergence of newer biologic drugs has shifted the treatment landscape. SUMMARY IPAA can be a safe and effective treatment modality for older adults with UC, with high self-reported patient satisfaction. Patient optimization and careful case selection are vital to achieving these outcomes, and specialized preoperative assessments and counseling can help facilitate the proper treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina L. Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Adam S. Faye
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Department of Gastroenterology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 305 East 33rd Street, NY 10016 New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duraes LC, Liang J, Steele SR, Cengiz B, Delaney CP, Holubar SD, Gorgun E. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients - is advanced age a contraindication? ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2180-2184. [PMID: 35434821 PMCID: PMC9542127 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Aim We aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients. Methods We identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 2016. Patients were grouped according to age: 50–59, 60–69 and 70+ years. Short and long‐term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) were compared among the groups. Results Six hundred and one patients were identified (399 (66.4%) between 50–59 181 (30.1%) between 60–69, and 21 (3.5%) over 70 years of age). More males were in the 70+ arm, and more two‐stage procedures were performed in this group. Wound infection increased with age (P = 0.023). There was a trend of more fistula and pouchitis in the 70+ patients (P = 0.052 and P = 0.055, respectively). Pouch failure rate increased with age, and it was statistically significant in the 70+ cohort (P = 0.015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that pelvic sepsis (HR 4.8 (95% CI 1.5–15.4), P = 0.009), fistula (HR 6.0 (95% CI 1.7–21.5), and mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.4–14.7)), were independently associated with pouch failure. No difference was observed in the QOL among the groups, but pouch function was better for patients younger than 60 years. Conclusion In elderly patients with UC, IPAA may be offered with reasonable functional outcomes, and ileal pouch retention rates, as an alternative to the permanent stoma. Stapled anastomosis increases the chance of pouch retention and should be recommended as long as the distal rectum does not carry dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo C Duraes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bora Cengiz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Conor P Delaney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pedersen KE, Jia X, Holubar SD, Steele SR, Lightner AL. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2062-2074. [PMID: 33825296 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Despite good overall outcomes in most patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), there is still hesitation about performing an IPAA in older patients due to the comorbidity burden and concern about incontinence. The aim of this work was to identify short- and long-term outcomes in older patinets undergoing IPAA to determine the perioperative safety and long-term functional success of IPAA in older patients. METHOD A literature search was performed for all publications on IPAA in adults aged ≥50 years that reported short- and long-term outcomes. Data extraction included demographics, 30-day outcomes, long-term functional outcomes and pouch failure. Data were further separated by age group (50-65 and ≥65 years). Outcomes were compared between age groups. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Of 1053 publications reviewed, 13 full papers were included in the analysis. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 47.3% and 1.3%, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative rates of small bowel obstruction and pelvic sepsis were 7.6% and 9.9%, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 62 months, rates of pouchitis, incontinence and pouch failure were 13.9%, 17.5% and 7.5%, respectively. There was no statically significant difference in rates of short- or long-term functional outcomes based on age 50-65 versus ≥65 years. CONCLUSION Increasing age did not increase the rate of short- or long-term outcomes, including pouch failure. These data suggest that the decision for IPAA construction should not be based on age alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina E Pedersen
- College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Xue Jia
- Department of Qualitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pellino G, Reif de Paula T, Lawlor G, Keller DS. Restorative surgery for ulcerative colitis in the elderly: an analysis of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Tech Coloproctol 2020:10.1007/s10151-020-02327-1. [PMID: 32803500 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02327-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis(UC) can be performed as either 2- or 3-stage procedure. IPAA in the elderly has been reported as safe and feasible, but little work to date has assessed outcomes by procedure. The aim of our study was to assess use and short-term outcomes of 2- and 3-stage IPAA in older adults. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was searched for ≥ 65-year-old patients who underwent IPAA for UC in 2- or 3-stage from 2012 to 2016. The primary endpoint was the rate and trends of the two approaches over time. Secondary endpoints included 30-day adverse events and complication-associated costs. RESULTS Overall, 123 patients were included: 77.5% (n = 83) 2-stage and 40 (32.5%) 3-stage IPAA. Mean age was 68.7 ± 3.9 years, with 43 (34.9%) women. The use of the 3-stage IPAA increased over time (18.8% in 2012 vs. 33.3% in 2016), with decreasing use of 2-stage IPAA(81.3% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). The morbidity associated with the procedures decreased over time, overall (81.3% in 2012 and 51.5% in 2016, p < 0.001) and in each group individually. No differences were observed in postoperative complications across groups (45.8% 2-stage, 32.5% 3-stage). The overall mean costs of care when no postoperative complications occurred was $25,910, vs. $38,577 when any complication occurred (p < 0.001), but no differences were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS In a national analysis, there was a trend of increasing 3-stage vs. 2-stage IPAA for UC in older Americans. Complications and complication-associated costs were comparable across approaches, suggesting that the choice of procedure type should be based on the specific patient comorbidities and surgeon preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Reif de Paula
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - G Lawlor
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 8th Floor Herbert Irving Pavilion, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Restorative surgery for ulcerative colitis in the elderly: an analysis of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:1255-1262. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02315-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
8
|
LeBlanc JF, Wiseman D, Lakatos PL, Bessissow T. Elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Updated review of the therapeutic landscape. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4158-4171. [PMID: 31435170 PMCID: PMC6700701 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
High-quality data remains scarce in terms of optimal management strategies in the elderly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population. Indeed, available trials have been mostly retrospective, of small sample size, likely owing to under-representation of such a population in the major randomized controlled trials. However, in the last five years, there has been a steady increase in the number of published trials, helping clarify the estimated benefits and toxicity of the existing IBD armamentarium. In the Everhov trial, prescription strategies were recorded over an average follow-up of 4.2 years. A minority of elderly IBD patients (1%-3%) were treated with biologics within the five years following diagnosis, whilst almost a quarter of these patients were receiving corticosteroid therapy at year five of follow-up, despite its multiple toxicities. The low use of biologic agents in real-life settings likely stems from limited data suggesting lower efficacy and higher toxicity. This minireview will aim to highlight current outcome measurements as it portends the elderly IBD patient, as well as summarize the available therapeutic strategies in view of a growing body of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Frédéric LeBlanc
- Department of Adult Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Daniel Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Department of Adult Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1083, Hungary
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Department of Adult Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment for patients undergoing colectomy to maintain intestinal continuity. Earlier studies have suggested that outcomes are worse in elderly patients who underwent IPAA. However, more recent reports have shown that IPAA outcomes in the elderly are comparable to younger patients. We review the recent medical literature regarding outcomes and treatments for common complications in elderly IPAA patients. RECENT FINDINGS Compared to younger patients, IPAA in the elderly is not associated with increased major surgical complications, but is associated with increased length of stay and re-admission rate for dehydration in older patients. Rates of fecal incontinence after IPAA were similar between younger and older patients. Sacral nerve stimulation has shown early promise as a possible treatment for fecal incontinence after IPAA, but more research is needed. Pouchitis is a common complication, and antibiotics remain first-line treatment options. Other treatment options include mesalamines, steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. The efficacy of newer biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab has been reported, but more data is needed. IPAA is safe in the elderly with high self-reported patient satisfaction. However, the elderly IPAA patient warrants special consideration regarding outcomes and management.
Collapse
|
10
|
McKenna NP, Mathis KL, Pemberton JH, Lightner AL. The Impact of Age at Time of Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis on Short and Long-Term Outcomes in Adults. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24:1857-1865. [PMID: 29718243 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited knowledge on ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) function when performed on patients older than age 50 years. The aim of this study was to determine if surgery on those older than age 50 years impacts short-term complications or long-term function. METHODS A retrospective review of all patients undergoing IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis at a single tertiary referral center between 2002 and 2013 was conducted. Short-term postoperative complications and long-term function and quality of life were analyzed according to age at pouch formation (age >50 vs age ≤50 years). RESULTS A total of 911 patients who underwent IPAA (542 male) were included, with 178 patients (20%) age >50 years and 733 (80%) ≤50 years. Patients >50 years had higher American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) scores and increased rates of obesity and dysplasia or cancer at the time of colectomy, and were less often on steroids (all P < 0.01). Over a median follow-up of 5 years, older patients reported increased daytime incontinence (60% vs 37%, P < 0.01) and pad usage (34% vs 11%, P < 0.01) at up to 1.5 years post-IPAA, after which time the groups became similar. Other functional outcomes, including pouch failure and quality of life, were similar between the 2 groups across the follow-up periods. CONCLUSION Performing an IPAA on carefully selected patients older than age 50 years has minor, transient differences in pouch function compared with patients younger than age 50 years. Assuming appropriate patient selection, IPAA should continue to be offered to older patients without increased risk of compromised function or of pouch failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John H Pemberton
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Surgery in ulcerative colitis: When? How? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 32-33:71-78. [PMID: 30060941 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronically-remitting inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by a contiguous inflammation of the colonic mucosa affecting the rectum that generally extends proximally in a continuous manner through the entire colon. Patients typically experience intermittent exacerbations, with symptoms characterized by bloody diarrhea associated with urgency and tenesmus. The anatomical extent of mucosal involvement is the most important factor determining disease course and is an important predictor of colectomy. The precise etiology of UC is unknown. However, a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors seems to have a key role in the development of the disease. UC usually is mildly active but it can be a life-threatening condition because of colonic and systemic complications, and later in the disease course due to the development of colorectal cancer. Interestingly, even if pathogenetic features detected in patients with sporadic CRC can be also found in UC-related colorectal cancer (UC-CRC), this latter is, usually, driven by an inflammation-driven pathway rising from a non-neoplastic inflammatory epithelium to dysplasia to cancer. Thus, a long-term follow-up with colonoscopy surveillance has been recommended. Approximately 15% of UC patients develop an acute attack of severe colitis, and 30% of these patients require colectomy. The initial treatment strategy in UC typically follows the traditional step-up approach. One third of the patients will not respond to steroid therapy and cyclosporine and infliximab are the most common salvage agents employed in these cases in order to avoid emergent surgery. Unfortunately, although a significant short-term benefit have been observed after infliximab treatment, the colectomy rate have remained stable. Surgery in UC depends on the stage of the disease as well as patient's status and is divided into the following settings: urgent, emergent and elective. Despite many efforts the surgical management of UC remains a significant challenge. A multidisciplinary management of UC is key in order to define the best timing and the best procedure for each patient in an individualized basis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zangenberg MS, Horesh N, Kopylov U, El-Hussuna A. Preoperative optimization of patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:1663-1676. [PMID: 29051981 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2915-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a challenging task. The aim of preoperative optimization (PO) is to decrease the risk of complications and reduce the length of postoperative stay. The aim of this study was to review and grade the available evidence, attain clear recommendations, and point out potential future research. METHODS Studies were identified from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and scanning reference lists in relevant papers. English-written studies examining PO in adult patients with IBD were included. Eight PO factors were investigated. RESULTS Management of IBD is a multidisciplinary task. Steroid withdrawal is recommended while steroid stress dose is not recommended. Thiopurines appear to be safe, but it may be prudent to plan the procedure remotely from the last dose of an anti-TNF agent. Nutritional risk screening is recommended to unveil and correct any malnutrition. Thrombosis prophylaxis prior to surgery is well supported by evidence while extended 4-week prophylaxis needs further research. Percutaneous ultrasound or CT-guided drainage for intra-abdominal abscesses is recommended, but it is unclear for how long supplementary antibiotics (ABs) should be used. Oral AB 24 h prior to open surgery might improve outcome if given as complementary to IV perioperative AB. Mechanical bowel preparation is not supported by evidence. Comorbidities must be treated accordingly prior to surgical intervention. Smoking cessation can be beneficial for wound healing. CONCLUSION Multimodel PO intervention in IBD patients is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nir Horesh
- Department of Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Alaa El-Hussuna
- Department of Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R, Ardizzone S, Armuzzi A, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Burisch J, Gecse KB, Hart AL, Hindryckx P, Langner C, Limdi JK, Pellino G, Zagórowicz E, Raine T, Harbord M, Rieder F. Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 1: Definitions, Diagnosis, Extra-intestinal Manifestations, Pregnancy, Cancer Surveillance, Surgery, and Ileo-anal Pouch Disorders. J Crohns Colitis 2017; 11:649-670. [PMID: 28158501 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1165] [Impact Index Per Article: 166.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Magro
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Porto; MedInUP, Centre for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines; Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Rami Eliakim
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastrointestinal Unit ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-University of Milan-Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Unit Complesso Integrato Columbus, Gastroenterological and Endocrino-Metabolical Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, University Hospital Santiago De Compostela (CHUS), A Coruña, Spain
| | - Johan Burisch
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark
| | - Krisztina B Gecse
- First Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest,Hungary
| | | | - Pieter Hindryckx
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Cord Langner
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust; Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Unit of General Surgery, Second University of Naples,Napoli, Italy
| | - Edyta Zagórowicz
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Department of Oncological Gastroenterology Warsaw; Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge,UK
| | - Marcus Harbord
- Imperial College London; Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London,UK
| | - Florian Rieder
- Department of Pathobiology /NC22, Lerner Research Institute; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition/A3, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Colombo F, Sahami S, de Buck Van Overstraeten A, Tulchinsky H, Mege D, Dotan I, Foschi D, Leo CA, Warusavitarne J, D'Hoore A, Panis Y, Bemelman W, Sampietro GM. Restorative Proctocolectomy in Elderly IBD Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Study on Safety and Efficacy. J Crohns Colitis 2017; 11:671-679. [PMID: 27927720 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Restorative proctocolectomy in elderly inflammatory bowel disease [ IBD] patients is controversial and limited data are available on the outcomes of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients, in a multicentre survey from European referral centres. METHODS The International Pouch Database [IPD] combined 101 variables. Patients aged ≥ 65 years were matched on the basis of open versus laparoscopic surgery with a control group of consecutive younger unselected patients with a ratio of 1:2. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed t test, chi square and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier function, and log-rank tests where appropriate. RESULTS In the IPD, 77 patients aged ≥ 65 years [Group A] and 154 control patients [Group B] were identified. Elderly patients had more comorbidities [p = 0.0001], longer disease duration [p = 0.001], less extensive disease [p = 0.006], more previous abdominal operations [p = 0.0006], surgery for cancer or dysplasia more frequently [p = 0.0001], fewer single-stage procedures [p = 0.03], more diversions after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] [p = 0.05], and a higher laparoscopic conversion rate [p = 0.04]. Postoperative complications and pouch failure were similar between the groups, but Group A had more Clavien-Dindo IV-V complications [p = 0.04], and longer length of stay [p = 0.007]. Laparoscopy was associated with a shorter duration of surgery [p = 0.0001], and length of stay [p = 0.0001], and the same complication rate as open surgery. CONCLUSIONS Restorative proctocolectomy can be performed in selected elderly patients, but there is a higher risk of postoperative complications and longer length of stay in this group. Laparoscopy is associated with shorter operating time and length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Colombo
- Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Milan, Italy
| | - Saloomeh Sahami
- Academisch Medisch Centrum, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hagit Tulchinsky
- Sourasky Medical Centre, Division of Surgery Colorectal Unit, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Diane Mege
- Hopital Beaujon, Pole des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Clichy, France
| | - Iris Dotan
- Sourasky Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Diego Foschi
- Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - André D'Hoore
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yves Panis
- Hopital Beaujon, Pole des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Clichy, France
| | - Willem Bemelman
- Academisch Medisch Centrum, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gianluca M Sampietro
- Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Department of Surgery - IBD Surgical Unit, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leitner GC, Vogelsang H. Pharmacological- and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches in inflammatory bowel disease in adults. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7:5-20. [PMID: 26855808 PMCID: PMC4734954 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i1.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a group of chronic inflammatory conditions mainly of the colon and small intestine. Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the most frequent types of IBD. IBD is a complex disease which arises as a result of the interaction of environmental, genetic and immunological factors. It is increasingly thought that alterations of immunological reactions of the patients to their own enterable bacteria (microfilm) may contribute to inflammation. It is characterized by mucosal and sub mucosal inflammation, perpetuated by infiltration of activated leukocytes. CD may affect the whole gastrointestinal tract while UC only attacks the large intestine. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a steroid-free long lasting remission in both entities. UC has the possibility to be cured by a total colectomy, while CD never can be cured by any operation. A lifelong intake of drugs is mostly necessary and essential. Medical treatment of IBD has to be individualized to each patient and usually starts with anti-inflammatory drugs. The choice what kind of drugs and what route administered (oral, rectal, intravenous) depends on factors including the type, the localization, and severity of the patient's disease. IBD may require immune-suppression to control symptoms such as prednisolone, thiopurines, calcineurin or sometimes folic acid inhibitors or biologics like TNF-α inhibitors or anti-integrin antibodies. For both types of disease (CD, UC) the same drugs are available but they differ in their preference in efficacy between CD and UC as 5-aminosalicylic acid for UC or budesonide for ileocecal CD. As therapeutic alternative the main mediators of the disease, namely the activated pro-inflammatory cytokine producing leukocytes can be selectively removed via two apheresis systems (Adacolumn and Cellsorba) in steroid-refractory or dependent cases. Extracorporeal photopheresis results in an increase of regulatory B cells, regulatory CD8(+) T cells and T-regs Type 1. Both types of apheresis were able to induce clinical remission and mucosal healing accompanied by tapering of steroids.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ramage L, Qiu S, Georgiou P, Tekkis P, Tan E. Functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in older patients: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:481-92. [PMID: 26754072 PMCID: PMC4773498 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2475-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is performed in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis with a view to restoration of GI continuity and prevention of permanent faecal diversion. Debate exists as to its safety in older patients. This review aims to assess functional outcomes and safety of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) in older compared to younger patients. METHODS Literature search was performed for age-stratified studies which assessed functional outcomes of IPAA. Twelve papers were included overall. Patients were categorized into 'older' and 'younger' groups. Analysis was split into three separate parts: 1. Age cut-off of 50 ± 5 years (with sensitivity analysis); 2. Age cut-off of 65 ± years; 3. Long-term outcomes (>10 years). RESULTS With an age cut-off of 50 years (4327 versus 513 patients), complication rates were comparable with the exception of an increased rate of small-bowel obstruction in the younger patients (p = 0.034). At 1 year, 24-h stool frequency was significantly higher in the older patient group (p < 0.0001). Daytime (p < 0.0001) and night-time (p < 0.0001) incontinence rates were also significantly higher in older patients. Overall, function deteriorated with time across all ages; however, after 10 years, there was no significant difference in incontinence rates between age groups. Dehydration and electrolyte loss was a significant problem in patients over 65 (p < 0.0001). Despite differences in postoperative function, quality of life was comparable between groups; however, only a few studies reported quality of life data. CONCLUSION IPAA is safe in older patients, although treating clinicians should bear in mind the increased risk of dehydration. Postoperative function is worse in older patients, but seems to level out with time and does not appear to significantly impact on overall quality of life and patient satisfaction. Assessment for suitability for RPC should not be based on chronological age in isolation. It is imperative that the correct support is given to older patients with worsened postoperative function in order to maintain patient satisfaction and adequate quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Ramage
- />Colorectal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK , />Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH UK
| | - Sheng Qiu
- />Colorectal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK , />Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH UK
| | - Panagiotis Georgiou
- />Colorectal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK , />Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH UK
| | - Paris Tekkis
- />Colorectal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK , />Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH UK
| | - Emile Tan
- />Colorectal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK , />Department of Surgery and Cancer, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guillem JG, Bertelsen C. Total proctocolectomy for rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome: indications and considerations. COLORECTAL CANCER 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.15.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY Patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer present a unique clinical challenge. Management of the primary rectal cancer and prophylactic removal of the colon should be considered. In patients requiring a mesorectal excision, a combined prophylactic colon removal can be considered. Although surveillance of the colon with frequent colonoscopies is an alternative, concerns of metachronous colon cancer development support prophylactic removal of the colon as an alternative. Since data are not available to confirm superiority of either approach, the final decision is greatly dependent upon a patient's wishes and preferences. Patients interested in pursuing simultaneous prophylactic colon removal can be offered total proctocolectomy with either ileal pouch anal-anastomosis as a sphincter-preserving alternative or a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose G Guillem
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, 1275 York Avenue, C1077, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Corinna Bertelsen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, 633 3rd Avenue, 1584A, New York, NY 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, Windsor A, Colombel JF, Allez M, d'Haens G, d'Hoore A, Mantzanaris G, Novacek G, Öresland T, Reinisch W, Sans M, Stange E, Vermeire S, Travis S, van Assche G. [Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis Part 2: Current management (Spanish version)]. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2015; 80:32-73. [PMID: 25769217 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Dignass
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso.
| | | | - A Sturm
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - A Windsor
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - J-F Colombel
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - M Allez
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G d'Haens
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - A d'Hoore
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G Mantzanaris
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G Novacek
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - T Öresland
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - W Reinisch
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - M Sans
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - E Stange
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - S Vermeire
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - S Travis
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Trigui A, Frikha F, Rejab H, Ben Ameur H, Triki H, Ben Amar M, Mzali R. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Points of controversy. J Visc Surg 2014; 151:281-8. [PMID: 24999229 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the most commonly used procedure for elective treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its original description, the procedure has been modified in order to obtain optimal functional results with low morbidity and mortality, and yet provide a cure for the disease. In this review of the literature of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, we discuss these technical modifications, limiting our discussion to the current points of controversy. The current "hot topics" for debate are: indications for ileal pouch-anal or ileo-rectal anastomosis, indications for pouch surgery in the elderly, indeterminate colitis and Crohn's disease, the place of the laparoscopic approach, transanal mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis vs. the double-stapled technique, the use of diverting ileostomy and the issue of the best route for delivery of pregnant women. Longer follow-up of patients and increased knowledge and experience with pouch surgery, coupled with ongoing prospective evaluation of the procedure are required to settle these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Trigui
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia.
| | - F Frikha
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| | - H Rejab
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| | - H Ben Ameur
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| | - H Triki
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| | - M Ben Amar
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| | - R Mzali
- Department of general and digestive surgery, Habib Bourguiba Teaching Hospital, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39:459-77. [PMID: 24405149 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2013] [Revised: 11/03/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients represent an increasing proportion of the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population. AIM To critically review available data regarding the care of elderly IBD patients. METHODS Bibliographic searches (MEDLINE) up to June 2013. RESULTS Approximately 10-15% of cases of IBD are diagnosed in patients aged >60 years, and 10-30% of the IBD population are aged >60 years. In the elderly, IBD is easily confused with other more common diseases, mainly diverticular disease and ischaemic colitis. The clinical features of IBD in older patients are generally similar to those in younger patients. Crohn's disease (CD) in elderly patients is characterised by its predominantly colonic localisation and uncomplicated course. Proctitis and left-sided ulcerative colitis are more common in patients aged >60 years. Infections are associated with age and account for significant mortality in IBD patients. The treatment of IBD in the elderly is generally similar. However, the therapeutic approach in the elderly should be 'start low-go slow'. The benefit of thiopurines in older CD patients remains debatable. Although the indications for anti-tumour necrosis factors in the elderly are generally similar to those for younger patients, lower response and higher adverse events have been reported in the elderly. Surgery in elderly patients does not generally differ. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis can be successful, provided the patient retains good anal sphincter function. CONCLUSIONS Management of the older IBD patient differs from that of younger patients; therefore, conventional practice algorithms may have to be modified to account for advanced age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Connelly TM, Koltun WA. The surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysplasia. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 7:307-21; quiz 322. [PMID: 23639089 DOI: 10.1586/egh.13.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Surgical management of colonic dysplasia discovered in the inflammatory bowel disease patient is controversial. Total proctocolectomy (TPC) is the most definitive treatment for the eradication of undiagnosed synchronous dysplasias and/or carcinomas and the prevention of subsequent metachronous lesions in both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, TPC is not always an attractive option owing to patient comorbidities and patient preference. Historically, dysplasia has been most studied in patients with UC, where the option of reconstruction without a stoma makes TPC more acceptable. Due to a relative lack of research on CD-related dysplasia, surveillance and treatment of CD dysplasia has followed paradigms based on UC data. However, due to pathophysiological differences in CD versus UC, options for surgical management in CD may be more varied than simple TPC, particularly in the less healthy surgical candidate and those who refuse end ileostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Connelly
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, Windsor A, Colombel JF, Allez M, D'Haens G, D'Hoore A, Mantzaris G, Novacek G, Oresland T, Reinisch W, Sans M, Stange E, Vermeire S, Travis S, Van Assche G. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis 2012; 6:991-1030. [PMID: 23040451 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 692] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2012] [Accepted: 09/03/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine 1, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Wilhelm-Epstein-Str. 4, D-60431 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Williams J. What we know now: pouch surgery 40 years on. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2012; 21:S20-1. [PMID: 23123620 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.sup16.s20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
For many patients, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (also called ileo-anal pouch surgery) not only eradicates disease but also preserves the anal sphincter, enabling the patient to defecate in the normal way. Pouch surgery is approaching 40 years and within this time has become the 'gold standard' in surgical management for ulcerative colitis and familial adeomatous polyposis. Much of the research over the years has explored surgical techniques and pouch function, failure and satisfaction, as well as long-term follow-up; however, some pouch problems continue to be a mystery. This short article aims to bring us up to date with what we know now that might have been beneficial to know then.
Collapse
|
24
|
de Zeeuw S, Ahmed Ali U, Donders RART, Hueting WE, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJHM. Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27:843-53. [PMID: 22228116 PMCID: PMC3378834 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1402-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive update of the outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). DATA SOURCES An extensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library was conducted. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION All studies published after 2000 reporting on complications or functional outcome after a primary open IPAA procedure for UC or FAP were selected. Study characteristics, functional outcome, and complications were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS A review with similar methodology conducted 10 years earlier was used to evaluate developments in outcome over time. Pooled estimates were compared using a random-effects logistic meta-analyzing technique. Analyses focusing on the effect of time of study conductance, centralization, and variation in surgical techniques were performed. RESULTS Fifty-three studies including 14,966 patients were included. Pooled rates of pouch failure and pelvic sepsis were 4.3% (95% CI, 3.5-6.3) and 7.5% (95% CI 6.1-9.1), respectively. Compared to studies published before 2000, a reduction of 2.5% was observed in the pouch failure rate (p = 0.0038). Analysis on the effect of the time of study conductance confirmed a decline in pouch failure. Functional outcome remained stable over time, with a 24-h defecation frequency of 5.9 (95% CI, 5.0-6.9). Technical surgery aspects did not have an important effect on outcome. CONCLUSION This review provides up to date outcome estimates of the IPAA procedure that can be useful as reference values for practice and research. It is also shows a reduction in pouch failure over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharonne de Zeeuw
- Department of Surgery, (Division of Abdominal Surgery), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Functional Outcome and Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Elderly Patients. ACTA FACULTATIS MEDICAE NAISSENSIS 2012. [DOI: 10.2478/v10283-012-0006-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
26
|
Vidall C. Should we recycle more than our plastic? BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2011; 20:S20. [PMID: 21647007 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.sup9.s20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
For many patients, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (also called ileoanal pouch surgery) not only eradicates disease but also preserves the anal sphincter, enabling the patient to defecate in the normal way. Pouch surgery is approaching 40 years and within this time has become the ‘gold standard’ in surgical management for ulcerative colitis and familial adeomatous polyposis. Much of the research over the years has explored surgical techniques and pouch function, failure and satisfaction, as well as long-term follow-up; however, some pouch problems continue to be a mystery. This short article aims to bring us up to date with what we know now that might have been beneficial to know then.
Collapse
|