Biochemical monitoring of carcinoma of prostate treated with an LH-RH analogue (Zoladex)

Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: pathogenesis, assessment and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The majority of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) will experience involvement of their gastrointestinal over the course of their disease. Despite the high prevalence of gastrointestinal involvement in SSc, the strategies pertaining to the assessment and treatment for this clinical dimension of SSc have historically been limited. However, the present review highlights recent research contributions that enhance our understanding of SSc-GI patient subsets and provides updates on pathogenic mechanisms of disease, assessment and symptom-directed management.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past few years, several studies have identified risk factors for more severe gastrointestinal disease in SSc and have provided insight to optimize diagnosis and management of SSc-GI symptoms. This article also provides a review of currently available investigations and therapies for individual SSc-GI disease manifestations and reflects on actively evolving areas of research, including our understanding the role of the gut microbiome in SSc.

SUMMARY

Here, we provide important updates pertaining to the risk stratification, assessment, diagnosis and management of SSc patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. These findings provide opportunities to enhance patient care and highlight exciting opportunities for future research.

Usefulness of Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir as Predictor of Androgen-Independent Progression of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

The objective of this study was to analyze the value of the nadir level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to predict androgen-independent progression (AIP) in metastatic prostate cancer patients after androgen deprivation therapy. In a group of 185 metastatic prostate cancer patients who received androgen deprivation therapy serum PSA was determined every three months until AIP occurred. Multiple regression analysis was performed to define independent clinical and PSA-related predictors of AIP. AIP was assumed to be present after two consecutive increases in serum PSA after the PSA nadir. Independent predictors of the duration of AIP-free survival (less than 12 months versus more than 12 months) were the extent of bone involvement (six or fewer hot spots versus more than six) with an odds ratio (O.R.) of 3.95, Gleason score (7 or less versus more than 7) with an O.R. of 3.47, and PSA nadir (2 μg/L or less versus more than 2 μg/L) with an O.R. of 14.63. AIP was independently predicted by the extent of bone involvement with an O.R. of 1.72, Gleason score with an O.R. of 1.74, PSA nadir with an O.R. of 3.22, and time to reach the PSA nadir (9 months or less versus more than 9 months) with an O.R. of 2.84. When patients were stratified according to these predictors, those with three good prognostic factors had a median AIP-free survival of 58 months while those with two, one or no good prognostic factors had a median AIP-free survival of 19 months, 12 months and 7 months, respectively. We conclude that the PSA nadir seems to be a good predictor of AIP in patients with metastatic prostate cancer after androgen deprivation therapy. Time to PSA nadir, extent of bone involvement and Gleason score are also independent predictors. The combination of these prognostic factors allows to stratify metastatic prostate cancer patients for the prediction of AIP.

Nadir prostate-specific antigen best predicts the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer

The objective of our study was to analyze the value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels before and after androgen suppression to predict the time to androgen-independent progression (AIP) in patients with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. A series of 283 prostate cancer patients under androgen suppression as a single treatment was studied. The disease was locally advanced in 98 patients and metastatic in the remainder 185. AIP was defined after 2 consecutive increases of serum PSA after the nadir value. The mean follow-up before AIP was 29.2 months (3-198). AIP was detected in 205 patients (72.4%). In 152 patients (74.1%), the event was detected within 24 months, while in 53 patients (25.9%), it was observed beyond 24 months. The multivariate analysis showed that the nadir PSA and the time to reach the nadir PSA were the most significant predictors of the time to AIP. The odds ratio of having a biochemical response greater than 24 months was 20 times higher in patients that achieved an undetectable PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or less. Moreover in those patients whose nadir PSA reached beyond 12 months after androgen suppression the odds ratio was 18 times higher. These results show that the ability to achieve an undetectable nadir PSA and the time to reach it are the most significant predictors of the time to AIP in patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer under androgen suppression as a single therapy.

Prognostic significance of the nadir prostate specific antigen level after hormone therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We determine whether the nadir prostate specific antigen (PSA) level after hormone therapy can be used to predict the progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the progressive status and survival of 177 patients with stage C or D prostate cancer who had received hormone therapy at our institution. The overall survival rate, incidence of progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer and interval until progression were analyzed with reference to the nadir PSA level. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the predictive factors for progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer, and the relative efficacy of the nadir PSA level in predicting progression was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

Median followup was 39 months (range 3 to 89) and 85.4% of patients (151) responded to treatment, of whom 77.5% (117) had progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer. Median time until nadir PSA levels were reached after hormone therapy was 8.1 months and median time until hormone refractory prostate cancer was 24.0 months. Nadir PSA levels were less than 0.2 ng./ml. in 31% of respondents, 0.2 to 1.0 ng./ml. in 23%, 1.1 to 10 ng./ml. in 42% and greater than 10 ng./ml. in 5%. These groups had similar clinicopathological characteristics. Nadir PSA levels correlated significantly with pretreatment PSA levels, Gleason scores and progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer (p = 0.01, p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively), and inversely correlated with the interval to the establishment of hormone refractory prostate cancer (r = -0.465, p <0.05). By univariate analysis bone metastasis, nadir PSA, PSA at 6 months after treatment and pretreatment PSA were significantly associated with progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer. Only the nadir PSA was calculated to be an independent factor by multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that nadir PSA predicted progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer after 2 years with an accuracy of 86.2%. With the lower limit of the nadir PSA level set to 1.1 ng./ml., sensitivity was 80.3% and specificity was 83.8%, and these levels were deemed the most appropriate. Furthermore, nadir PSA after hormone therapy was an independent prognosticator for survival, as were initial levels of hemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase.

CONCLUSIONS

The nadir PSA level after hormone therapy may be the most accurate factor predicting the progression to hormone refractory prostate cancer and is an independent prognostic factor for survival. Furthermore, a lower limit for the nadir PSA level of 1.1 ng./ml. gives optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Prognostic significance of changes in prostate-specific antigen in patients with metastasis prostate cancer after endocrine treatment

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer respond to androgen withdrawal therapy, but progression to androgen independence is frequently observed. To clarify the predictor of response to endocrine therapy, the role of PSA changes and the prognosis of the patients were evaluated in 115 Japanese cases of prostate cancer with distant metastases treated with androgen withdrawal therapy. When patients were divided according to the pretreatment PSA value (high, > or = 500, median; 500 > PSA > or = 100, low; 100 >), patients whose initial PSA levels were high had a worse cause-specific survival. PSA value at 3 or 6 months following endocrine treatment, PSA nadir, and percent decrease of PSA were associated with prolonged survival. Clinical relapse was observed in 68 patients. Patients with distant recurrence had shorter time to PSA elevation than those with local recurrence. In metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with androgen withdrawal, serial measurement of PSA could distinguish nonfavorable responders early in the course of treatment and assist in monitoring for disease progression.

Liarozole--a novel treatment approach for advanced prostate cancer: results of a large randomized trial versus cyproterone acetate. Liarozole Study Group

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of oral liarozole, the first retinoic acid metabolism-blocking agent (RAMBA) to be developed as differentiation therapy for human solid tumors, with that of cyproterone acetate (CPA), an antiandrogen for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Liarozole promotes differentiation of cancer cells by increasing the intratumoral levels of retinoic acid.

METHODS

A total of 321 patients with metastatic prostate cancer in relapse after first-line endocrine therapy entered a Phase III international multicenter study (recruitment from February 1992 to August 1994) comparing liarozole (300 mg two times daily) with CPA (100 mg two times daily).

RESULTS

Accounting for differences in baseline prognostic factors, the adjusted hazard ratio for survival was 0.74 in favor of liarozole (P = 0.039), indicating a 26% lower risk of death than in patients treated with CPA. Median crude (unadjusted) survival time was the same in the liarozole group as in the CPA group (10.3 months). More patients showed a PSA response (at least 50% reduction in PSA from baseline) when treated with liarozole (20%) than with CPA (4%) (P < 0.001). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responders had a median survival benefit of 10 months over nonresponders, irrespective of treatment (hazard ratio 0.43; P = 0.0018). PSA response was apparent within 3 months in approximately 90% of patients who responded. Pain improved more in the liarozole group than in the CPA group (P = 0.03). PSA responders had lower median pain scores than nonresponders (1.7 versus 2.5) and better quality of life (median Functional Living Index-Cancer score 108 versus 98) at end point, ie, treatment discontinuation, as well as throughout the treatment period. Among the most frequently occurring adverse events in the liarozole group were dry skin (51% of patients), pruritus (25%), rash (16%), nail disorders (16%), and hair loss (15%). These adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity and did not affect the overall quality of life score. There were no detectable effects of either treatment on vital signs such as blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiogram, and body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Liarozole is superior to CPA in terms of PSA response, PSA progression, and survival, and is capable of maintaining patients' quality of life. The observed adverse events were mild to moderate in nature. These results show that liarozole is a possible treatment option after first-line endocrine therapy has failed.

Endocrine therapy of prostate cancer

Endocrine therapy is effective treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Most patients will benefit from androgen withdrawal in terms of symptomatic relief and delay in progression of diseases. It does not, however, cure patients with metastatic prostate cancer. This finding emphasizes the need for the development of effective nonendocrine therapies.

How is androgen-dependent metastatic prostate cancer best treated?

The principles of management of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer have changed little since the time of Huggins and his colleagues. Modern clinicians have many more weapons in their therapeutic armamentarium than those pioneers, but little progress has been made in improving the survival of men with this disease. The results of androgen deprivation are comparable using any one of a number of different monotherapy approaches. The use of combined androgen blockade may improve survival in men with minimal disease but at considerable economic cost and with significant impairment of quality of life. The benefit of this therapy for men with more extensive disease is uncertain. New modalities such as intermittent androgen blockade or combination therapies are exciting, but unproven.

A guide to the interpretation of serum prostate specific antigen levels

OBJECTIVE

To review the factors that affect the concentration of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the serum.

RESULTS

The discussion includes the structure of PSA; its distribution and metabolism; various analytical aspects of PSA measurements; the effects of clinical manipulations on PSA, including digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, cystoscopy, biopsy and transurethral resection of the prostate; factors affecting PSA levels in health, in benign disease, and in prostate cancer; the effect of various treatments on PSA; and the issue of reference ranges.

CONCLUSION

Laboratory staff and physicians must take many factors into consideration when interpreting PSA results.

Prognostic factors in metastatic prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy is the initial treatment choice for metastatic disease. When enrolling patients into androgen deprivation trials, it is important to consider stratification of enrollees based on prognostic factors that have been identified as important in determining the likelihood of response. Prognostic factors are also helpful in identifying which patients are less likely to respond to treatment; this information also would help to counsel patients. Performance status is an important prognostic factor; however, its impact is minimal because the great majority of men who receive treatment for advanced disease have a normal performance status. Hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, and a semiquantitative grading scale for the number of metastatic foci on the bone scan are useful prognostic factors. The pretreatment serum testosterone level is a powerful prognostic factor. Patients with a low serum testosterone level have a shorter progression-free survival than men whose pretreatment serum testosterone level is above normal. The prognostic importance of pretreatment serum testosterone level has been evaluated in studies using treatment methods that lower this level to castrate levels. Recently, we found that serum testosterone level was not a prognostic factor for men taking the nonsteroidal antiandrogen, Casodex (Zeneca, Wilmington, DE), which does not alter the serum testosterone level. The pretreatment serum prostatic-specific antigen also is a prognostic factor. This antigen may be the best single method for monitoring patients in regard to response to or progression following therapy. The return of the prostatic-specific antigen level to normal (< 4 ng/ml), or the decline in the prostatic-specific antigen level of > 90% indicates a prolonged progression-free survival. In the future, it will be interesting to incorporate both the initial prognostic factors as well as monitor the prostatic-specific antigen into a multivariate analysis, which will be highly predictive of a man's response to treatment.

Prognostic significance of changes in prostate-specific markers after endocrine treatment of stage D2 prostatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value was determined of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) measured before and after endocrine treatment in 57 patients with newly diagnosed Stage D2 prostatic cancer.

METHODS

Therapy included orchiectomy or administration of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogues or an antiandrogen.

RESULTS

The absolute pretreatment PSA (elevated in 100% of patients) but not PAP (abnormal in 93%) predicted disease progression (P < 0.0011), i.e., a poor response to therapy. Fifty-three patients responded to androgen deprivation with a decrease in PSA level. This declined to normal at 3 and 6 months in 25% of patients. Forty-nine percent had a greater than 90% decrease in their PSA level. By 1 year, 58% of patients had progressive disease. Both the nadir PSA level and the percent decline from the pretreatment level at 3 and 6 months predicted the progression-free interval (P < 0.001). Patients with a 90% or greater decline in PSA had a prolonged progression-free survival. Serial PAP levels were similarly prognostic.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that PSA was better than PAP in evaluating patients before and after androgen-deprivation therapy. The nadir level of both markers was an important tool to predict progression-free survival in patients with metastatic prostatic cancer.

Levels of prostate specific antigen that predict skeletal spread in prostate cancer

The ability of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and serum acid phosphatase (SAP) to identify skeletal spread was evaluated in untreated patients with prostatic cancer. Twenty patients with scintigraphic evidence of metastatic disease in bone (M1) at diagnosis were compared with 50 untreated patients in whom scans were repeatedly negative during long-term surveillance. Using the present laboratory upper limit of normal (ULN) of 3 iu/l, the sensitivity and specificity of SAP for M1 disease were 80 and 86% respectively. Stepwise discriminant analysis demonstrated that SAP was able to stage patients correctly (bone scan positive or negative) with 81% predictive accuracy at an optimum cut-off limit of 4.6 iu/l. By contrast, whilst PSA (Hybritech) was 100% sensitive for skeletal disease at 10 ng/ml--at the expense of poor (36%) specificity--analysis determined that an optimum cut-off limit of 58 ng/ml led to 79% predictive accuracy for disease in bone. It was concluded that PSA levels > 58 ng/ml are highly indicative of spread to the skeleton, even in the absence of radiological or scintigraphic evidence of metastases.

The Clinical Usefulness of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen After Hormonal Therapy of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

We longitudinally followed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in 48 patients who were treated with either orchiectomy, monthly luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone injection or continuous diethylstilbestrol for stage D2 prostate adenocarcinoma and achieved an objective response. Of the patients 34 had clinical evidence of disease progression (median remission duration 19 months). Median length of followup for the 14 patients who remained in remission was 42 months. Pretreatment performance status, pretreatment extent of metastases as measured by a bone scan and post-treatment nadir PSA level were univariately correlated with remission duration. After adjustment for the 2 former pretreatment variables, a highly significant independent effect of the nadir PSA level on remission duration persisted. Patients whose post-treatment nadir PSA level decreased below 4 ng./ml. had a significantly longer remission duration than those whose nadir PSA remained elevated (median 42 versus 10 months, p less than 0.0001). No cases were observed to progress (as defined by our criteria independent of PSA level) while the serial post-treatment PSA levels continued to decrease or remained at a plateau after reaching the nadir. The time at which the PSA began to increase once the nadir was reached predated objective evidence of progression in all patients except 2 in whom the 2 events occurred simultaneously (mean lead time 7.3 +/- 5.0 months). We conclude that following serial PSA levels in patients treated with androgen ablation for metastatic prostate cancer can aid in distinguishing favorable from nonfavorable responders early in the course of therapy and greatly assist in monitoring for progression.

Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology

The perfect tumor marker would be one that was produced solely by a tumor and secreted in measurable amounts into body fluids, it should be present only in the presence of cancer, it should identify cancer before it has spread beyond a localized site (i.e., be useful in screening), its quantitative amount in bodily fluids should reflect the bulk of tumor, and the level of the marker should reflect responses to treatment and progressive disease. Unfortunately, no such marker currently exists, although a number of useful but imperfect markers are available. The predominant contemporary markers are discussed here by chemical class, as follows: glycoprotein markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA); mucinous glycoproteins, including CA 15-3, CA 19-9, mucinous-like cancer antigen and associated antigens, and CA 125; enzymes, including prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP); hormones and related endocrine molecules, including calcitonin, thyroglobulin, and catecholamines; and, molecules of the immune system, including immunoglobulins and beta-2-microglobulin. The biologic properties of each group of tumor markers are discussed, along with our assessment of their role in clinical medicine today.

Prostatic specific antigen and the prediction of prognosis in metastatic prostatic cancer

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were studied in the EORTC trial of zoladex plus flutamide versus orchidectomy in metastatic prostatic cancer. Forty-four of 60 patients had a decrease of PSA to less than or equal to 10 ng/ml at 3 to 6 months after treatment. The combination of a PSA less than 10 ng/ml after 3 to 6 months treatment and less than 15 spots on the bone scintigram at entry gave the highest probability of not having progressed by 24 months. A rising PSA anticipated bone progression by 6 to 12 months in 13 of 28 patients (46%). The PSA at entry to the trial was related to survival; a discriminant of 300 ng/ml distinguished a poor and better risk group. The lowest level of PSA reached during the first 6 months of treatment was also a univariate survival factor.

Prostate-specific antigen testing in untreated and treated prostatic adenocarcinoma

The isolation and purification of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the development of a radioimmunoassay for this antigen represent major advancements for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and the monitoring of response to therapy in patients with this disease. Both monoclonal and polyclonal assays for PSA are available. In attempts to correlate pathologic tumor stage and PSA levels, tumors of higher stage (pathologic stages C1, C2, D1, and D2) have been associated with elevated PSA levels. Increased PSA levels have also been found in patients with benign prostatic diseases (benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatitis). PSA has been shown to be an excellent marker after radical prostatectomy and for monitoring of radiation therapy. Patients with a persistently elevated PSA level for more than 6 months postoperatively should be assessed for residual or recurrent local or systemic disease. Thus far, routine use of PSA testing as a mass screening modality for prostatic cancer has not been considered cost-effective.

The influence of reversible androgen deprivation on serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

This study was designed to investigate the relationship of serum prostate-specific antigen to prostatic size and hormonal stimulation. Seven patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were treated for six months with nafarelin acetate and then followed for an additional six months. Nafarelin acetate is a potent luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist which causes reversible testosterone deprivation resulting in involution of the prostate. During therapy and follow up, serum prostate-specific antigen correlated with: 1) serum testosterone (p less than 0.001); 2) quantity of prostatic epithelium (p less than 0.001); and 3) prostatic size (p less than 0.05). Before therapy, serum prostate-specific antigen (mean +/- SD) was 0.43 +/- 0.2 ng./ml. per gram of epithelium. This did not change significantly after six months of androgen deprivation (0.48 +/- 0.36), although the ratios of prostate-specific antigen to testosterone and to prostatic size each changed significantly. Despite testosterone levels in the castrate range at six months, five of seven patients had serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations above the female range and three of seven patients had prostatic biopsies containing columnar epithelium which stained positively for prostate-specific antigen. These results demonstrate that serum prostate-specific antigen is related to prostatic size, prostatic epithelial weight, and testosterone stimulation. However, prostatic size is not a good predictor of serum prostate-specific antigen because there is tremendous variation in the relative amount of epithelium in a prostate; in this study the ratio of prostatic size to epithelial weight varied threefold. Furthermore, although testosterone determines prostatic size and amount of prostatic epithelium, it may not totally control prostate-specific antigen production.