Pilot study of salvage laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer

Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review (French ccAFU)

The aim of this study was to systematically review the current evidence regarding the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) for recurrent prostate cancer. A systematic review was conducted throughout September 2022 using the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Embase databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies. A total of 55 studies (3836 patients) met our eligibility criteria. The vast majority of men included had radiation therapy (including brachytherapy) as their first-line treatment (n = 3240, 84%). Other first-line treatments included HIFU (n = 338, 9%), electroporation (n = 59, 2%), proton beam therapy (n = 54, 1.5%), cryotherapy (n = 34, 1%), focal vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (n = 22, 0.6%), and transurethral ultrasound ablation (n = 19, 0.5%). Median preoperative PSA, at the time of recurrence, ranged from 1.5 to 14.4 ng/mL. The surgical approach was open in 2300 (60%) cases, robotic in 1465 (38%) cases, and laparoscopic in 71 (2%) cases. Since 2019, there has been a clear increase in robotic versus conventional surgery (1245 versus 525 cases, respectively). The median operative time and blood loss ranged from 80 to 297 min and 75 to 914 mL, respectively. Concomitant lymph node dissection was performed in 2587 cases (79%). The overall complication rate was 34%, with a majority of Clavien grade I or II complications. Clavien ≥ 3 complications ranged from 0 to 64%. Positive surgical margins were noted in 792 cases (32%). The median follow-up ranged from 4.6 to 94 months. Biochemical recurrence after sRP ranged from 8% to 51.5% at 12 months, from 0% to 66% at 22 months, and from 48% to 59% at 60 months. The specific and overall survival rates ranged from 13.4 to 98% and 62 to 100% at 5 years, respectively. Urinary continence was maintained in 52.1% of cases. sRP demonstrated acceptable oncological outcomes. These results, after sRP, are influenced by several factors, and above all by pre-treatment assessment, including imaging, with the development of mpMRI and metabolic imaging. Our results demonstrated that SRP can be considered a suitable treatment option for selected patients, but the level of evidence remains low.

The role of lymph node dissection in salvage radical prostatectomy for patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of lymph node dissection on the outcomes of patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from radiation-recurrent patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent SRP from 2000-2016. None of the patients had clinical lymph node involvement before SRP. The effect of the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) and the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastases free survival, and overall survival (OS) was tested in multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

About 334 patients underwent SRP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Lymph node involvement was associated with increased risk of BCR (p < .001), metastasis (p < .001), and overall mortality (p = .006). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, an increased number of RLNs significantly lowered the risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, p = .01). In patients with positive lymph nodes, a higher number of RLNs and a lower number of PLNs were associated with improved freedom from BCR (HR 0.89, p = .001 and HR 1.34, p = .008, respectively). At a median follow-up of 23.9 months (interquartile range, 4.7-37.7), neither the number of RLNs nor the number of PLNs were associated with OS (p = .69 and p = .34, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pathologic lymph node involvement increased the risk of BCR, metastasis and overall mortality in radiation-recurrent PCa patients undergoing SRP. The risk of BCR decreased steadily with a higher number of RLNs during SRP. Further research is needed to support this conclusion and develop a precise therapeutic adjuvant strategy based on the number of RLNs and PLNs.

Prognostic value of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in different malignancies. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative AGR for oncological outcomes in patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) treated with salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients with radiation recurrent PCa who underwent SRP at five referral centers. Levels of albumin and globulin were obtained before SRP and used to calculate the preoperative AGR level. The optimal cut off value of preoperative AGR was 1.4. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall 89 (41.6%) patients had a low preoperative AGR. Low serum AGR was associated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in univariable Cox regression analysis (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.06-2.43, P=0.026). When adjusted for the effects of established preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic confounders in different multivariable Cox regression models, this association did not retain its statistical significance. Moreover, preoperative AGR was not associated with metastasis free survival (P=0.21), overall survival (P=0.91) or cancer specific survival (P=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with radiation recurrent PCa undergoing SRP, low preoperative AGR was associated with the risk of BCR only in univariable analysis. There was no association with metastasis or survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate this biomarker in the setting of primary PCa and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from a local therapy.

Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is not uncommon, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate management after radiation treatment failure. This article seeks to explore the currently utilized modalities for salvage treatment for radiorecurrent PCa. We focused our review on the oncologic outcomes and reported toxicity rates in the latest studies examining salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), salvage cryotherapy (SCT), salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and re-irradiation.

RECENT FINDINGS

There does not appear to be any significant difference in overall survival for more invasive salvage radical prostatectomy compared to the minimally invasive salvage approaches. Additionally, there seems to be a trend towards lower morbidity rates associated with minimally invasive and focal salvage treatment. We are encouraged by the results presented in this review and find that there is clearly a role for emerging minimally invasive and focal therapies as durable options for salvage treatment in patients with radiorecurrent PCa.

Salvage local therapy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer - where are we?

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer among males in Europe and a leading cause of cancer deaths, with similar proportion in other developed countries. For more than twenty years, external-beam radiation therapy, alongside with radical prostatectomy, has been used as a primary radical therapeutic approach for localized prostate cancer. Yet, EBRT failures relate to 22-69% following curative radiotherapy (± androgen deprivation therapy). Additionally, a proportion of these men will have a biopsy-proven local recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Medline and Web of Science databases were searched without a time limit during March 2016 using the terms 'prostate cancer' in conjunction with 'radiotherapy', 'recurrence', 'biochemical', 'salvage', 'brachytherapy', 'prostatectomy', 'HIFU', 'cryotherapy' and 'focal'. The search was limited to the English, Polish, German and Spanish literature.

RESULTS

Currently, salvage treatment after failed radiotherapy includes radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy and ablative whole-gland therapies, such as cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound. New approaches, so called focal salvage therapy, involve ablation of only the zone of recurrence in order to decrease tissue injury and therefore to diminish morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

At present no authoritative recommendations can be concluded because of the absence of randomized data with standardized definitions and protocols. Nevertheless, we believe that local salvage treatment should be at least considered in patients after biochemical relapse following radiotherapy.

Salvage robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for the management of renal cell carcinoma following failed stereotactic radiotherapy

With proper patient selection, this study suggests a robot-assisted laparoscopic approach may be utilized in the salvage management of renal tumors following failed stereotactic radiosurgery.

Nephron-sparing surgery is currently the standard of care for the management of small renal masses. While both neoadjuvant and adjuvant conventional external beam radiotherapy have failed to demonstrate an oncologic benefit for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, more recent work aims to explore the utility of stereotactic radiotherapy. We present the case of a 70-year-old woman who failed primary treatment of a small renal mass with the CyberKnife radiotherapy system and describe her successful salvage treatment with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. This case demonstrates the safety of robotic surgery for the management of renal tumors following failed stereotactic radiotherapy.