Robotic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique

Association between glycemia and outcomes of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The research aimed to provide the most recent and comprehensive analysis and evidence update comparing outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) based on different glycemia levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was conducted until September 2023. The purpose was to identify research that examined the effects of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and normoglycemia on NE outcomes. The hyperglycemic, normoglycemic and hypoglycemic group were compared. Outcomes measured were mortality, abnormal MRI, hearing or visual unfavorable outcomes, neurodevelopmental delay, cerebral palsy, and all unfavorable outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen literatures comprising 2,427 participants (1,233 with normoglycemia, 835 with hyperglycemia, and 359 with hypoglycemia) were considered. Pooled analysis showed more overall adverse outcomes, higher mortality and worse hearing or visual outcomes in the hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic group compared to the normoglycemic group. There was no notable distinction found in abnormal MRI and cerebral palsy among all groups. The hypoglycemic group exhibited greater neurodevelopmental delay than normoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining normal blood glucose levels in neonates with NE can help reduce the risk of adverse consequences such as hearing and visual impairment.

Comparison of AirSeal versus conventional insufflation system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy of the AirSeal Valveless Trocar Needle Insufflation System in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The study compared the differences in perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS). A systematic search of databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science was performed to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS) in RAPN. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024524335). The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) and postoperative pain scores between the two approaches. The review included four studies with 379 patients, 194 in the AIS group and 185 in the CIS group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar in all outcomes. SCE was significantly lower in the AIS group than in the CIS group [(OR) 0.30 (0.16, 0.54), p < 0.001]. Postoperative 12-h pain scores were also significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group [(WMD) - 0.93 (- 1.67, - 1.09), p = 0.014]. Both groups showed a significant reduction in length of hospitalization [(WMD) - 0.12 (- 0.84, 0.60), p = 0.746], thermal ischemia time [(WMD) 4.72 (- 5.71, 15.15), p = 0.375], amount of lost hemoglobin [(WMD) - 0.19 (- 0.53, 0.15), p = 0.284], pneumothorax [(OR) 0.13 (0.02,1.10), p = 0.062], mediastinal emphysema [(OR) 0.55 (0.20, 1.46), p = 0.230], and 4-h pain score [(WMD) - 0.25 (- 1.16, 0.65), p = 0.584]; no significant differences were observed. The incidence of subcutaneous emphysema SCE and 12-h pain scores were significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group. The AirSeal system demonstrated similar efficacy and a higher safety profile than the conventional insufflation system in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy; however, due to the lack of a randomized study on the topic, further data are needed.

A Comparison of Functional and Oncologic Outcomes between Partial Nephrectomy and Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease after Propensity Score Matching

Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for a small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and Methods: Patients with CKD who underwent either PN or RFA for SRM between 2005 and 2019 were included. Patients were stratified into two categories: CKD stage 2 and CKD stage 3 or higher. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis in patients with CKD stage 2 and CKD stage 3 or higher. We compared the functional and oncological outcomes between two groups according to CKD stage before and after PSM. Results: Among 1332 patients, 1195 patients were CKD stage 2 and 137 patients were CKD stage 3 or higher. After PSM analysis using age, pre-treatment eGFR, and clinical tumor size as matching variables, the PN and RFA groups had 270 and 135 CKD stage 2 patients, respectively, and both had 53 patients each with CKD stage 3 or higher. There were no significant differences in percent change in eGFR at 1 year post-operation between groups in patients with CKD stage 2 and stage 3 or higher. Among all patients with tissue-proven malignancy, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were significantly higher in the PN group. However, only the 5-year RFS was significantly higher in the PN group after matching. Conclusion: Mortality is low in patients with SRM, and functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two treatments. RFA could be an alternative treatment modality in patients who are poor candidates for surgery.

Roughness of the renal tumor surface could predict the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty of partial nephrectomy (PN) is essential to minimize the perioperative complications and to achieve a good surgical outcome. Recently, various scoring systems have been used to evaluate the difficulty of PN including R.E.N.A.L (Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location) nephrometry score. There were no scoring systems evaluating the roughness of the renal tumor surface and we hypothesized that the roughness of the renal tumor surface might affect the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of roughness of the renal tumor surface on the surgical outcome of RAPN.

METHODS

Overall, 161 patients underwent RAPN performed by the same surgeon between May 2016 and April 2019. We divided those tumors into two groups, like "roughness positive (tumor with roughness of tumor surface)" and "roughness negative (tumor without roughness of tumor surface)" according to the roughness of the endophytic region on preoperative computed tomography images. Clinical and pathological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-five and 78 tumors were identified roughness negative and positive, respectively. Cases with roughness positive showed a significantly longer operative time, console time, and ischemia time and had greater blood loss than those with roughness negative. Significant and independent predictors of ischemia time and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease were roughness of tumor surface, tumor size (not for eGFR decrease), and N score of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score.

CONCLUSION

Roughness of renal tumor surface was significantly and positively associated with ischemia time and the eGFR decrease rate.

Analysis of executional and procedural errors in dry‐lab robotic surgery experiments

Background

Analysing kinematic and video data can help identify potentially erroneous motions that lead to sub‐optimal surgeon performance and safety‐critical events in robot‐assisted surgery.

Methods

We develop a rubric for identifying task and gesture‐specific executional and procedural errors and evaluate dry‐lab demonstrations of suturing and needle passing tasks from the JIGSAWS dataset. We characterise erroneous parts of demonstrations by labelling video data, and use distribution similarity analysis and trajectory averaging on kinematic data to identify parameters that distinguish erroneous gestures.

Results

Executional error frequency varies by task and gesture, and correlates with skill level. Some predominant error modes in each gesture are distinguishable by analysing error‐specific kinematic parameters. Procedural errors could lead to lower performance scores and increased demonstration times but also depend on surgical style.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into context‐dependent errors that can be used to design automated error detection mechanisms and improve training and skill assessment.

A Modified Two-Layer Suture Technique for Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Single-Center Clinical Experience

Purposes

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a modified two-layer suture method during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) by a comparative analysis with the traditional two-layer suture.

Methods

A total of 60 LPN patients were enrolled in this study, of which 30 patients received the modified two-layer suture method and the remaining 30 patients underwent the traditional two-layer suture. Then, surgical characteristics including operative time, warm ischemic time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were recorded. Finally, univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the correlations of tumor characteristics, suture methods, and postoperative renal function.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two suture groups with respect to patient and tumor characteristics, postoperative creatinine level, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level. The modified suture group showed a significantly shorter clamping time and a less GFR level reduction than the traditional two-layer suture group (15 vs. 23 min; 42.32 ± 9.48 vs. 27.07 ± 7.88; p < 0.05). Additionally, the modified two-layer suture was an independent factor that influenced the clamping time and the level of GFR reduction.

Conclusion

The modified two-layer suture method is feasible and effective for LPN.

Comparison of Perioperative, Renal Functional, and Oncological Outcomes Between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: An Updated Evidence-Based Analysis

Objectives

We aimed to report the latest and largest pooled analysis and evidence update to compare the perioperative, renal functional, and oncological outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumors.

Patients and methods

We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to August 2021 for studies that compared the efficacy and/or safety between off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN for renal tumors. Outcomes measured were operating time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion rate, length of stay (LOS), complication rate, transfusion rate, long-term % decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), positive surgical margin rate, and recurrence rate.

Results

A total of 21 eligible articles involving 4,493 patients (1,274 off-clamp versus 3,219 on-clamp) were included for the evidence synthesis. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar in all outcomes except that lower R.E.N.A.L. score and smaller tumor size were observed in the off-clamp group. Pooled analysis showed shorter operative time, higher EBL, and lower complication rate in the off-clamp group. No significant difference was observed in the conversion rate, LOS, and transfusion rate. The recurrence rates were similar in the two groups, while a lower positive surgical margin rate was observed in the off-clamp group. Finally, the off-clamp group had a superior postoperative renal functional outcome.

Conclusions

Given the presence of heterogeneity and potential bias, urologists should select the clamp strategy based on their experience and patient-specific factors.

[Review of upper urinary modified minimal invasive surgical technology]

Upper urinary surgery is an important area of urology surgery. Open surgery used to be the gold standard of upper urinary surgery. With the development of medical techniques, minimal invasive surgeries including laparoscopic and robot assisted-laparoscopic surgery have gradually replaced the open surgery. Because of the complexity and diversity of upper urinary diseases, surgeries sometimes are difficult, and minimal invasive surgeries require higher surgical abilities of urologists than open surgeries. In recent years, depending on our surgical experience and international reports, our team from three Chinese medical centers summarizes techniques of upper urinary minimal invasive surgeries. For malignant diseases, such as renal and ureteral carcinomas, it's important to totally remove the tumor first, and then to avoid the surgical injuries. We summarize surgical experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for moderately complex renal hilar tumors. Our team modified minimal invasive techniques for some complex tumors, including ring suture technique for renal hilar tumors, internal suspension technique for renal ventral tumors, and combination retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery with mini-flank incision for complex renal tumors. While for begin diseases, urologists should focus on the resections and surgical injuries at the same time. We have reported the novel technique of laparoscopic aspiration for central renal angiomyolipoma, making the surgery simple and available. For reconstruction surgeries, operations should be based on several principals. We generalize it as "4TB principals", which include "tension-free", "water-tight", "thin suture", "no touch of the key area" and "protecting the blood supply". Depending on the localization, length, and etiology of the strictures, different techniques are required. Our team summarize the pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation and ileal ureter replacement based on our surgical experience. For infant upper urinary surgeries, our team has made invasive surgeries that can be used in complex diseases, such as duplex kidney. Based on years of surgical techniques, our modified surgeries achieve a better subjective cosmetic result than the traditional surgeries. In the future, the standardized, practical, simple and individual minimal invasive surgical technique will become the main direction in the future researches.

A "pickup" stereoscopic camera with visual-motor aligned control for the da Vinci surgical system: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

The current state-of-the-art surgical robotic systems use only a single endoscope to view the surgical field. Research has been conducted to introduce additional cameras to the surgical system, giving rise to new camera angles that cannot be achieved using the endoscope alone. While this additional visualization certainly aids in surgical performance, current systems lack visual-motor compatibility with respect to the additional camera views. We propose a new system that overcomes this limitation.

METHODS

In this paper, we introduce a novel design of an additional "pickup" camera that can be integrated into the da Vinci Surgical System. We also introduce a solution to work comfortably in the various arbitrary views this camera provides by eliminating visual-motor misalignment. This is done by changing the working frame of the surgical instruments to work with respect to the coordinate system at the "pickup" camera instead of the endoscope.

RESULTS

Human user trials ([Formula: see text]) were conducted to evaluate the effect of visual-motor alignment with respect to the "pickup" camera on surgical performance. An inanimate surgical peg transfer task from the validated Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) Training Curriculum was used, and an improvement of 73% in task completion time and 80% in accuracy was observed with the visual-motor alignment over the case without it.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that there is a requirement to achieve visual-motor alignment when utilizing views from external cameras in current clinical surgical robotics setups. We introduce a complete system that provides additional camera views with visual-motor aligned control. Such a system would be useful in existing surgical procedures and could also impact surgical planning and navigation.

Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To perform a bicenter, retrospective study of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) and assess costs using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). We identified 355 consecutive patients who underwent RALPN at University of California Los Angeles and the University of Michigan during 2009-2016. We matched according to RENAL nephrometry score, date, and institution for 78 retroperitoneal versus 78 transperitoneal RALPN. Unadjusted analyses were performed using McNemar's Chi-squared or paired t test, and adjusted analyses were performed using multivariable repeated measures regression analysis. From multivariable models, predicted probabilities were derived according to approach. Cost analysis was performed using TDABC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients treated with retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal RALPN were similar in age (P = 0.490), sex (P = 0.715), BMI (P = 0.273), and comorbidity (P = 0.393). Most tumors were posterior or lateral in both the retroperitoneal (92.3%) and transperitoneal (85.9%) groups. Retroperitoneal RALPN was associated with shorter operative times (167.0 versus 191.1 min, P = 0.001) and length of stay (LOS) (1.8 versus 2.7 days, P < 0.001). There were no differences in renal function preservation or cancer control. In adjusted analyses, retroperitoneal RALPN was 17.6-min shorter (P < 0.001) and had a 76% lower probability of LOS at least 2 days (P < 0.001). Utilizing TDABC, transperitoneal RALPN added $2337 in cost when factoring in disposable equipment, operative time, LOS, and personnel.

SUMMARY

In two high-volume, tertiary centers, retroperitoneal RALPN is associated with reduced operative times and shortened LOS in posterior and lateral tumors, whereas sharing similar clinicopathologic outcomes, which may translate into lower healthcare costs. Further investigation into anterior tumors is needed.

Suture techniques during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis of peri-operative outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence on renorrhaphy techniques and to assess their impact on peri-operative outcomes after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed in January 2018 without time restrictions, using MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement recommendations. Studies providing sufficient details on renorrhaphy techniques during laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and comparative studies focused on peri-operative outcomes were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 and 19 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. The overall quality of evidence was low. Specific tumour features (i.e. size, hilar location, anatomical complexity, nearness to renal sinus and/or urinary collecting system), surgeon's experience, robot-assisted technology, as well as the aim of reducing warm ischaemia time and the amount of devascularized renal parenchyma preserved represented the key factors driving the evolution of the renorrhaphy techniques during MIPN over the past decade. Quantitative synthesis showed that running suture was associated with shorter operating and ischaemia time, and lower postoperative complication and transfusion rates than interrupted suture. Barbed suture had lower operating and ischaemia time and less blood loss than non-barbed suture. The single-layer suture technique was associated with shorter operating and ischaemia time than the double-layer technique. No comparisons were possible concerning renal functional outcomes because of non-homogeneous data reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Renorrhaphy techniques significantly evolved over the years, improving outcomes. Running suture, particularly using barbed wires, shortened the operating and ischaemia times. A further advantage could derive from avoiding a double-layer suture.

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney

Background

To estimate oncologic and functional outcomes for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) for tumors in a solitary kidney.

Methods

Nineteen patients with sporadic renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney were treated with RFA, and 21 patients were treated with PN between November 2008 and September 2015. Basic demographic information including age, gender, operative and pathological data, complications, renal function, oncological outcomes, was obtained for each patient. Statistical analysis was done to test for the correlation of clinical and pathological features, renal function outcomes, as well as oncological outcomes of RFA and PN. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0.

Results

No significant differences were indicated between the RFA and PN with respect to mean patient age, tumor size, as well as intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean length of hospitalization (P = 0.019) and mean operative time (P = 0.036) was significantly shorter in RFA, with the median estimated blood loss being greater in PN (P = 0.001). The mean serum creatinine level 24 h following operation were significantly higher than preoperative creatinine in PN (P = 0.009), but did not reach statistical significance in RFA. Local recurrence were detected in only 1 patient (5%) in PN and 3 patients (18.75%) in RFA (P = 0.4). One patient developed pulmonary metastasis and one exhibited tumor persistence in RFA, none were present in PN.

Conclusions

Radiofrequency Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Tumors in a Solitary Kidney were all safe and effective, with each method having distinct advantages. It is the decision of the patient and urologist to pick the best approach.

Early surgical outcomes and oncological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To describe a multicentre experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in northern England, with focus on early surgical outcomes and oncological results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing RAPN at four tertiary referral centres in northern England in the period 2012-2015 were included for analysis. RAPN was performed via a transperitoneal approach using a standardized technique. Prospective data collection was performed to capture preoperative characteristics (including R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score), and peri-operative and postoperative data, including renal function. Correlations between warm ischaemia time (WIT), positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, complication rates, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores and learning curve were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients (mean age 58.1 ± 13 years, mean ± sd body mass index 27.3 ± 7 kg/m² ) were included, with a median (range) follow-up of 12 (3-36) months. The mean ± sd tumour size was 30.6 ± 10 mm, mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was 6.1 ± 2 and 55% of tumours were left-sided. Mean ± sd operating console time was 141 ± 38 min, WIT 16.7 ± 8 min and estimated blood loss 205 ± 145 mL. There were five conversions (2%) to open/radical nephrectomy. The overall complication rate was 16.4% (Clavien I, 1.6%; Clavien II, 8.8%; Clavien III, 6%; Clavien IV/V; 0%). Pathologically, 82.4% of tumours were malignant and the overall PSM rate was 7.3%. The mean ± sd preoperative and immediate postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates were 92.8 ± 27 and 80.8 ± 27 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively (P = 0.001). In all, 66% of patients remained in the same chronic kidney disease category postoperatively, and none of the patients required dialysis during the study period. 'Trifecta' (defined as WIT < 25 min, negative surgical margin status and no peri-operative complications) was achieved in 68.4% of patients overall, but improved with surgeon experience. PSM status and long WIT were significantly associated with early learning curve.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest multicentre RAPN study in the UK. Initial results show that RAPN is safe and can be performed with minimal morbidity. Early oncological outcomes and renal function preservation data are encouraging.

Use of the Satinsky clamp for hilar clamping during robotic partial nephrectomy: indications, technique, and multi-center outcomes

A Satinsky clamp may be a backup option for hilar clamping during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) if there are challenges with application of bulldog clamps, but there are potential safety concerns. We evaluate outcomes of RPN using Satinsky vs. bulldog clamps, and provide tips for safe use of the Satinsky as a backup option. Using a multi-center database, we identified 1073 patients who underwent RPN between 2006 and 2013, and had information available about method of hilar clamping (bulldog clamp vs. Satinsky clamp). Patient baseline characteristics, tumor features, and perioperative outcomes were compared between the Satinsky and bulldog clamp groups. A Satinsky clamp was used for hilar clamping in 94 (8.8 %) RPN cases, and bulldog clamps were used in 979 (91.2 %) cases. The use of a Satinsky clamp was associated with greater operative time (198 vs. 175 min, p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (EBL, 200 vs. 100 ml, p < 0.001), warm ischemia time (WIT, 20 vs. 19 min, p = 0.036), transfusion rate (12.8 vs. 4.8 %, p = 0.001), and hospital stay (3 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001). Tumor characteristics and number of renal vessels were similar between groups. There were six intraoperative complications in the Satinsky clamp group, but none were directly related to the Satinsky clamp. On multivariable analysis, the use of the Satinsky clamp was not associated with increase in intraoperative or Clavien ≥3 postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rate or percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate. A Satinsky clamp can be a backup option for hilar clamping during challenging RPN cases, but requires careful technique, and was rarely necessary.

Ring Suture Technique in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar Cancer: A New Renorrhaphy Technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a ring suture technique during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) for management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the renal hilum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data for patients with renal hilar cancer who underwent RLPN from January 2010 to March 2015 were collected. All surgeries involved the ring suture technique, following the same procedure: the renal artery was dissected and clamped, the tumor was enucleated from the kidney, defects of the vascular and collecting system were repaired, and then the edge of the renal parenchyma was sutured continuously along the border. Finally, the renal artery clamp was removed, and any injury of the vascular system was repaired if necessary. We retrospectively analyzed renal ischemic time, blood loss, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Among the 17 patients, 11 were male (median age 61 years, range 42-71 years). Mean tumor diameter was 3.4 ± 0.9 cm and median R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was 8 (range 6-10). The mean warm ischemic time was 23.0 ± 9.2 minutes and median blood loss during surgery was 110 mL (range 70-350 mL); we had no case of uncontrollable massive bleeding. Radical nephrectomy was used in one case because of tumor embolus in a branch of the renal vein. All patients recovered well following surgery. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of RCC in all cases, with the main subtype clear-cell carcinomas (88.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ring suture technique is safe and effective for management of renal hilar cancer during RLPN for selected patients.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis

INTRODUCTION

We sought to evaluate the association of obesity with surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) using a large, multicentre database.

METHODS

We identified 1836 patients who underwent RPN from five academic centres from 2006-2014. A total of 806 patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between obese and non-obese patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the association of obesity on RPN outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 806 (44%) patients were obese with median BMI of 33.8kg/m(2). Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had greater median tumour size (2.9 vs. 2.5cm, p<0.001), mean RENAL nephrometry score (7.3 vs. 7.1, p=0.04), median operating time (176 vs. 165 min, p=0.002), and median estimated blood loss (EBL, 150 vs. 100 ml, p=0.002), but no difference in complications. Obesity was not an independent predictor of operative time or EBL on regression analysis. Among obese patients, males had a greater EBL (150 vs. 100 ml, p<0.001), operative time (180 vs. 166 min, p<0.001) and warm ischemia time (WIT, 20 vs. 18, p=0.001), and male sex was an independent predictor of these outcomes on regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, multicentre study on RPN, obesity was not associated with increased complications and was not an independent predictor of operating time or blood loss. However, in obese patients, male gender was an independent predictor of greater EBL, operative time, and WIT. Our results indicate that obesity alone should not preclude consideration for RPN.

Robotic surgical skill acquisition: What one needs to know?

Robotic surgery has been eagerly adopted by patients and surgeons alike in the field of urology, over the last decade. However, there is a lack of standardization in training curricula and accreditation guidelines to ensure surgeon competence and patient safety. Accordingly, in this review, we aim to highlight ‘who’ needs to learn ‘what’ and ‘how’, to become competent in robotic surgery. We demonstrate that both novice and experienced open surgeons require supervision and mentoring during the initial phases of robotic surgery skill acquisition. The experienced open surgeons possess domain knowledge, however, need to acquire technical knowledge under supervision (either in simulated or clinical environment) to successfully transition to robotic surgery, whereas, novice surgeons need to acquire both domain as well as technical knowledge to become competent in robotic surgery. With regard to training curricula, a variety of training programs such as academic fellowships, mini-fellowships, and mentored skill courses exist, and cater to the needs and expectations of postgraduate surgeons adequately. Fellowships provide the most comprehensive training, however, may not be suitable to all surgeon-learners secondary to the long-term time commitment. For these surgeon-learners short-term courses such as the mini-fellowships or mentored skill courses might be more apt. Lastly, with regards to credentialing uniformity in criteria regarding accreditation is lacking but earnest efforts are underway. Currently, accreditation for competence in robotic surgery is institutional specific.

Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step guide

OBJECTIVE

To describe a step-by-step guide for successful implementation of the retroperitoneal approach to robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient is placed in the flank position and the table fully flexed to increase the space between the 12th rib and iliac crest. Access to the retroperitoneal space is obtained using a balloon-dilating device. Ports include a 12-mm camera port, two 8-mm robotic ports and a 12-mm assistant port placed in the anterior axillary line cephalad to the anterior superior iliac spine, and 7-8 cm caudal to the ipsilateral robotic port.

RESULTS

Positioning and port placement strategies for successful technique include: (i) Docking robot directly over the patient's head parallel to the spine; (ii) incision for camera port ≈1.9 cm (1 fingerbreadth) above the iliac crest, lateral to the triangle of Petit; (iii) Seldinger technique insertion of kidney-shaped balloon dilator into retroperitoneal space; (iv) Maximising distance between all ports; (v) Ensuring camera arm is placed in the outer part of the 'sweet spot'.

CONCLUSION

The retroperitoneal approach to RPN permits direct access to the renal hilum, no need for bowel mobilisation and excellent visualisation of posteriorly located tumours.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: inching toward gold standard

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) offers excellent and lasting oncologic control. Technical refinements in apical dissection, such as the retroapical approach of synchronous urethral transection, and adoption of real-time frozen section analysis of the excised prostate during RARP have substantially reduced positive surgical margin rates, particularly in high-risk disease patients. Furthermore, precision offered by the robotic platform and technical evolution of radical prostatectomy, including enhanced nerve sparing (veil), have led to improved potency and continence outcomes as well as better safety profile in patients undergoing surgical therapy for prostate cancer.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in contemporary practice

Laparoscopic renal surgery is associated with reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stay, enhanced cosmesis, and more rapid convalescence relative to open renal surgery. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a minimally invasive, nephron-sparing alternative to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN) for the management of small renal masses. While offering similar oncological outcomes to laparoscopic RN, the technical challenges and prolonged learning curve associated with LPN limit its wider dissemination. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), although still an evolving procedure with no long-term data, has emerged as a viable alternative to LPN, with favorable preliminary outcomes. This article provides an overview of the role of RAPN in the management of renal cell carcinoma. The clinical indications and principles of surgical technique for this procedure are discussed. The oncological, renal functional, and perioperative outcomes of RAPN are also evaluated, as are complication rates.

Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The use of robotic assistance for the partial nephrectomy procedure has emerged as an alternative that may help some of the technical challenges of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The main concerns in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy relates to a steeper 'learning curve', prolonged warm ischaemia times and the potential for postoperative haemorrhage. The article delineates the dynamics of patient preparation, the surgical team, surgical technique & post-operative care to conclude that robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative to both open and laparoscopic techniques. Partial nephrectomy has shown both improved overall patient survival and more effective preservation of renal function, when compared with radical nephrectomy. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has several potential advantages over the laparoscopic approach. Robotic assistance allows urologists to perform this complex reconstructive procedure more quickly, with improved precision and dexterity, tremor elimination and improved visualization. The present article aims to delineate the dynamics of patient preparation and surgical team, surgical technique and postoperative care. The oncological outcomes and disease-free survival of partial nephrectomy have been found to be equivalent to open partial nephrectomy [1-4].

[Simplified renorrhaphy using self-retaining barbed suture during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a challenging procedure that requires quick and effective intracorporeal suturing, that could limit widespread adoption. Refinements of surgery have improved warm ischemia times and facilitated renal reconstruction. We present a technique that makes renorrhaphy easier using Self-Retaining Barbed Suture (SRBS) weaving two threads.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two patients with carcinoma of the kidney, 3.4 and 1.5 cm respectively, were subjected to the LPN. The SRBS is an absorbable polygluconate with small projections along its axis which are anchored in the tissue, distributing the tension of the suture line and eliminating the need for knots. Renorrhaphy was performed using the SRBS by two continuous suture lines without knots, setting the sutures with clips of Hem-o-lok(®) and adjusting it with the technique of «sliding clip», without placing «bolsters» inside the renal parenchymal defect.

RESULTS

Operative time was 156 minutes and 163 minutes, intraoperative bleeding was 50 ml and 850 ml, the warm ischemia time was 14.3 minutes and 23 minutes and follow-up time was 7 months and 3 months in the first and second cases respectively. The hospital stay was 5 days and there were no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Simplified renorrhaphy using SRBS is effective, hemostatic, facilitates the renal reconstruction, and can help reduce the warn ischemia time.

Robot-assisted urological surgery: Current status and future perspectives

Objectives

To discuss the current status of robot-assisted urological surgery.

Methods

We searched PubMed for articles published from 2008 using the search terms ‘advances’, ‘robotic surgery equipment’ and ‘instrumentation’. We also searched PubMed for articles describing the latest developments in reconstructive techniques for lower and upper urinary tract procedures. Finally, we searched PubMed for original articles containing the terms ‘robotic surgery training’ and ‘credentialing’.

Results

With each release of hardware or ancillary instrumentation, the reconstructive abilities of the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) improve. Recent developments in reconstructive capabilities of robotic urological surgery include posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, barbed sutures for urethrovesical anastomosis, sliding-clip renorrhaphy for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, and repair of pelvic organ prolapse. The safe implementation of robotic surgery is aided by new guidelines in credentialing and proctoring, and the introduction of virtual reality simulators for training.

Conclusion

Robotic urological surgery is rapidly developing and expanding globally. To achieve the highest levels of safety for patients, surgeons must ensure that the implementation of robotic surgery is an integrative and effective process.