DEVELOPMENT OF MALE GENITAL LICHEN SCLEROSUS IN PENILE RECONSTRUCTION SKIN GRAFTS AFTER CANCER SURGERY: AN UNREPORTED COMPLICATION

Penile Lichen Sclerosis: A Surgical Perspective of its Aetiology and Treatment

Penile lichen sclerosis is a longstanding inflammatory disease of the skin with a controversial aetiology. Penile lichen sclerosis (PLS) is a growing, inflammatory dermatitis of the anogenital region, which involves the meatus, prepuce, penile shaft, and glans penis. Although the accurate aetiology of PLS is contentious, multiple factors including genetics, autoimmunity, infections of human papillomavirus, hepatitis C, Epstein-Barr virus, risk factors (hormonal and trauma), etc., can be considered to be a part of the etiopathogenesis of PLS. The initial clinical presentations of penile lichen sclerosis are white plaques, atrophied skin, erythema, erosions, and sclerosis in the anogenital region. When the disease advances, the following can occur, including meatal constraints, telangiectasia, petechiae, soreness, papular lesions, tightness of the foreskin, difficulties in passing urine, itching, tenderness on erections, pain, cracking, bleeding, redness, rashes, tightness at frenulum, and dysuria. This disease has a dangerous course of action and if untreated it may be linked with severe urologic and sexual morbidities. PLS is usually treated with medical and surgical interventions like topical or intralesional steroids and circumcision. The role of circumcision is very critical in the course of action and prognosis of PLS, and its treatment is dependent on the stage of the disease. This review brings up the knowledge regarding epidemiology, etiopathology, clinical presentation, and management of PLS with an emphasis on the role of circumcision.

Outcomes for Management of Lichen Sclerosus Urethral Strictures by 3 Different Techniques

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes from a large, single institution series of patients with lichen sclerosus (LS) who underwent surgical management of their urethral strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients who underwent surgical management of their LS urethral strictures from 2003 to 2014, comparing outcomes of patients undergoing a single-stage buccal mucosa graft (BMG) urethroplasty, 2-stage BMG urethroplasty, or perineal urethrostomy (PU). Demographic and surgical outcomes data were collected for all patients.

RESULTS

Of the 79 patients, the mean follow-up was 32.4 months, mean age was 50.1 years, and the mean body mass index was 35.7, with morbid obesity (body mass index > 35) in 48% of the cohort. The mean stricture length was 9.6 cm (1.5-21 cm), with 62% of patients having a bulbopendulous stricture. Of the 37 patients who were planned for a 2-stage BMG urethroplasty, 9 (24%) patients had stricture recurrence or recurrent LS in the first-stage BMG. Single-stage BMG urethroplasty was performed in 20 patients with a mean stricture length of 9.47 cm (4-21 cm) and a success rate of 75%. Fourteen patients from the cohort received a PU as the primary treatment, with a success rate of 93%.

CONCLUSION

Management of LS strictures continues to pose challenges to the reconstructive surgeon due to the high rate of stricture recurrence and often progression. Patients undergoing single-stage or 2-stage reconstruction often require revision and must be carefully observed for recurrent urethral stricture. PU offers the highest degree of success and should be considered for all patients.

Male genital lichen sclerosus

Male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease responsible for male sexual dyspareunia and urological morbidity. An afeared complication is squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis. The precise etiopathogenesis of MGLSc remains controversial although genetic, autoimmune and infective (such as human papillomavirus (HPV) hepatitis C (HCV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Borrelia) factors have been implicated: Consideration of all the evidence suggests that chronic exposure of susceptible epithelium to urinary occlusion by the foreskin seems the most likely pathomechanism. The mainstay of treatment is topical ultrapotent corticosteroid therapy. Surgery is indicated for cases unresponsive to topical corticosteroid therapy, phimosis, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture, carcinoma in situ (CIS) and squamous cell carcinoma.