Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) as an effective and safe procedure for large renal stones

A novel double-sheath negative-pressure versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney stone

This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a novel double-sheath negative-pressure minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (D-mPCNL) compared to conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (C-mPCNL) for large kidney stones. A total of 132 patients diagnosed with large kidney stones in our hospital were included in the study. Among them, sixty-eight patients underwent D-mPCNL, while sixty-four underwent C-mPCNL. Parameters such as operative duration, stone-free rate, incidence of postoperative complications, and the need for auxiliary procedures were evaluated between the two groups. Compared to the C-mPCNL group, the D-mPCNL group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time (41.97 ± 8.24 min vs. 52.30 ± 13.72 min; P < 0.000), lower rates of auxiliary procedures (5.9% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.041), and lower fever rates (2.9% vs. 14.1%; P = 0.021). The group also had a significantly higher primary stone-free rate (85.3% vs. 70.3%; P = 0.038). However, there were no statistically significant advantages in terms of the final stone-free rate, hemoglobin drops, and stone composition in the D-mPCNL group (P > 0.05). D-mPCNL is a novel surgical method that is safe and effective, reducing operative time, improving stone-free efficiency, and decreasing postoperative complications.

Comparative efficacy between retrograde intrarenal surgery with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study

Objective

To observe the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery combined with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (V-UAS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in patients with 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stone.

Patients and methods

A total of 173 patients with 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stone were prospectively randomized into two groups. Eighty-six in the V-UAS group and 87 cases as control in the MPCNL group. The SFRs at different times (Postoperative 1 day, 2nd week and 4th week) was considered as the primary outcome of the study. The secondary end points were operative time, postoperative hospital stay and operative complications.

Results

There was no obvious difference between two groups in patients' demographics and preoperative clinical characteristics (all P > 0.05). Postoperative data showed that the SFR at postoperative 1 day in the V-UAS group was significantly lower than that in the MPCNL group (73.2% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.034). However, there was no statistical significance between two groups in SFRs during postoperative 2 weeks and 4 weeks (All P > 0.05). The levels of WBC, CRP and PCT were all significant lower in the V-UAS group than those in the MPCNL group at the postoperative 24 h and 48 h (all P < 0.05). Postoperative complications included fever (≥38.5°C), bleeding, pain and urosepsis. In terms of the rates of fever, pain and urosepsis, MPCNL group were all significantly higher than those in the V-UAS group (10.3 vs. 2.4%, P = 0.031; 14.9 vs. 2.4%, P = 0.003; 4.6 vs. 0.0%, P = 0.044; respectively). No significant difference was found between two groups in bleeding. Meanwhile, postoperative hospital stay in the V-UAS group was more shorten than that in the MPCNL group (3.7 vs. 5.9 days, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our study showed that RIRS with V-UAS, a new partnership to treat 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stones, was satisfying as it achieved a high SFR rate and a low rate of infectious complications. This method was safe and reproducible in clinical practice.

Increased renal uptake and urine excretion of oxidized LDL is possibly associated with formation of large calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

Growing evidence have suggested an association between nephrolithiasis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) with unclear mechanism. Oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) induces atherosclerosis and was found to be the possible link between these two diseases. Our study aimed to examine the serum, urine and kidney expression of oxLDL in relation to large calcium oxalate (CaOx) renal stone disease.

METHODS

A total of 67 large CaOx dominant renal stone patients and 31 stone-free controls were enrolled in the prospective case-control study. All participants were without known CVD history. Serum, urine, and kidney biopsy were collected before and during percutaneous nephrolithotomy, respectively. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to assess serum and urine oxLDL, lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

RESULTS

There was no significantly difference in circulating oxLDL, but serum hsCRP was significantly near two-fold higher in nephrolithiasis patients. Serum hsCRP was also correlated with stone maximal length. Urine oxLDL was significantly higher in the nephrolithiasis group and correlated with serum hsCRP and stone maximal length. Increased oxLDL uptake in kidney was found in nephrolithiasis patients, whereas no significantly renal expression of oxLDL was observed in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The renal uptake of oxLDL with increased oxLDL excretion from large CaOx renal stone formers, independent of increased circulating oxLDL, is a novel pathological finding in kidney stone disease and brings attention to the possible involvement of renal steatosis in the process of urolithiasis formation.

Miniaturization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new?

Objective

To summarize recent advancements in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in surgical technique, stone removal strategy, lithotripsy, and surgical model from the current literature.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of relevant English-language articles up to October 2022 using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The following keywords were used in the search: "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "mini-PCNL", "mini-perc", "mPCNL", and "miniaturization".

Results

A series of new progress has been made in many aspects of mini-PCNL, such as further reduction of tract size-needle perc and further improvement of robotic-assisted PCNL-artificial intelligence-powered robotic devices.

Conclusion

Many studies and trials have been conducted to reduce morbidity and increase the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL. It is crucial to realize that miniaturization of PCNL requires not only a smaller percutaneous tract size, but also an adjustment strategically in renal access, stone removal, lithotripsy, and surgical model in general. More large-scale prospective research needs to be carried out to further validate and optimize the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL.

Factors Affecting Residual Stone Rate, Operative Duration, and Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Background and objectives: Although minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) has demonstrated its efficacy, complete stone clearance was not always achieved, necessitating a second procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with residual stone rate, operative duration, complications, and hospital stay, in order to develop algorithms for pre-operative prognosis and planning. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved 163 Bulgarian patients who underwent MPCNL with Holmium: YAG lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones. Patients were considered stone-free if no visible fragments (<3 mm) were found on nephroscopy at the end of the procedure, as well as on postoperative X-ray and abdominal ultrasound on the first postoperative day. Results: Immediate postoperative stone-free outcome was attained for 83.43% of the patients (136/163). Residuals were associated with staghorn stones (OR = 72.48, 95% CI: 5.76 to 91.81); stones in two locations (OR = 21.91, 95% CI: 4.15 to 137.56); larger stone size (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.006 to 1.25); and higher density (OR = 1.03, 95% CI:1.005 to 1.06). The overall categorization accuracy for these factors was 93.80%, AUC = 0.971 (95% CI: 0.932 to 0.991), 89.71% sensitivity, and 96.30% specificity. Predictors of prolonged operative duration were staghorn stones and volume, R-square (adj.) = 39.00%, p < 0.001. Longer hospitalization was predicted for patients with hydronephrosis and staghorn stones, R-square (adj.) = 6.82%, p = 0.003. Post-operative complications were rare, predominantly of Clavien-Dindo Grade 1, and were more frequent in patients with hydronephrosis. We did not find a link between their occurrence and the outcome of MPCNL. Conclusions: Staghorn stones and stones in more than one location showed the strongest association with residual stone rate. Staghorn stones and larger volume were linked with a longer operative duration. Hydronephrosis increased the risk of complications and longer hospitalization.

Assessment of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Calculi Treatment

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction is a novel imaging technique widely used to improve surgical operations. Some studies have identified its role in Urology for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objective: To explore the potential benefits of 3D reconstruction technology in PCNL for complex renal calculi treatment. Methods: A retrospective study involving 139 patients with complex kidney stones who underwent PCNL was conducted between September 30, 2018, to September 30, 2019. Group A patients (72) underwent the 3D reconstruction technique before PCNL, while group B (67) did not. The operation time, the duration of the hospital stay, the puncture accuracy, the decrease in hemoglobin concentration, the stone clearance rate, and the postoperative complications were noted and compared between the two groups. Results: The initial stone clearance rates 2 weeks after PCNL were 81.9 and 64.2% in groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). The first-time puncture success rates were 87.5 and 47.8 % in groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). Group A had a shorter operation time than group B (62 vs. 79 min, P < 0.05). Besides, the 3D reconstructive technique-assisted patients (91.7%) had no or mild complications, compared with (74.6%) group B patients. There was no significant difference in hemoglobin decline and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusions: The 3D reconstruction technology is an effective adjunct to PCNL in the complex renal calculi treatment.

Double-Sheath Vacuum Suction Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Large Renal Stones

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe a novel double-sheath vacuum suction minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) to overcome the deficiencies of the conventional procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2019 and December 2019, 65 patients (37 males and 28 females) with a mean age of 41 years (range 23-69) underwent mini-PCNL with double-sheath vacuum suction. It consisted of an F20 Y-shaped sheath as an outer sheath and an F16 Y-shaped sheath as an inner sheath, in which the inner sheath was longer than the outer sheath. The oblique arm of the outer sheath and the inner sheath was connected to the perfusion inflow and the vacuum suction, respectively. A 550-μm holmium-YAG laser was introduced for stone fragmentation through the working channel of the mini-nephroscope, which was no longer connected to the perfusion fluid.

RESULTS

All procedures were successful. Mean operation time was 50.2 min (range 39-83). Mean hemoglobin decrease was 5.2 g/L (range 1.0-15.5), and no patient needed a blood transfusion. One patient (1.5%) with low fever (<38°C) at day 1 had returned to normal at day 2 without administration of antibiotics. There were no Clavien grade 2-4 complications. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.4 days (range 2-6). The initial stone-free rate of PCNL was 81.53% (53 of 65 patients). One month after surgery, the final stone-free rate increased to 90.77% (59/65 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The double-sheath vacuum suction mini-PCNL is a safe and effective modality for large renal stones, which might increase the efficiency of stone extraction with low intrapelvic pressure.

Double-sheath vacuum suction versus vacuum-assisted sheath minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of large renal stones: single-center experience

PURPOSE

To compare double-sheath vacuum suction minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (DS-mini-PCNL) with vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (VS-mini-PCNL) and to better define the potential benefits of DS-mini-PCNL.

METHODS

Between July 2019 and May 2020, 117 patients with large radiopaque renal stones underwent mini-PCNL. Of these, 63 underwent DS-mini-PCNL and 54 underwent VS-mini-PCNL. For VS-mini-PCNL, a F20 Y-shaped sheath was used and the oblique arm of the sheath was connected to the vacuum suction. For DS-mini-PCNL, the oblique arm of a F20 Y-shaped sheath (the outer sheath) and a F16 Y-shaped sheath (the inner sheath) was connected to the perfusion inflow and the vacuum suction, respectively. A 550-μm holmium-YAG laser was used for stone fragmentation.

RESULTS

Compared with VS-mini-PCNL group, DS-mini-PCNL group had significantly shorter operative time (35.78 ± 7.77 min vs. 44.56 ± 13.19 min; P = 0.000) and significantly lower fever rate (1.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.048). It was not significantly different between the two groups despite the higher initial stone-free rate seen for DS-mini-PCNL group relative to VS-mini-PCNL group (87.7% vs. 81.5%, P = 0.346). Auxiliary procedure rates were 4.8% (three patients) in DS-mini-PCNL group and 16.7% (nine patients) in VS-mini-PCNL group, with a significant difference (P = 0.034). The difference in the final stone-free rate between the two groups was rendered insignificant (93.8% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.510).

CONCLUSIONS

DS-mini-PCNL is a safe and effective modality for large renal stones, which could increase the efficiency of stone extraction and decrease infectious complications compared with VS-mini-PCNL.

Clinical Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum Cleaner Effect or with a Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose: To compare outcomes of two different miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques: minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) with the vacuum cleaner effect and vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (vmPCNL). Materials and Methods: Data from 104 (66.7%) patients who underwent vmPCNL and 52 (33.3%) patients who underwent MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed. Patient demographics and peri- and postoperative data were recorded, and propensity score matching was performed. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to identify variables associated with operative time (OT) and patient effective dose. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with infectious complications and stone-free (SF) status. Results: Patient demographics and stone characteristics were comparable between groups. vmPCNL was associated with shorter OT (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time, and patient effective dose (4.2 mSv vs 7.9 mSv; p < 0.001). A higher rate of infectious complications was found in the MIP group (25.0% vs 7.7%, p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed that stone volume, multiple stones, and MIP procedure (all p values ≤0.02) were associated with longer OT. Similarly, OT and the MIP procedure (p ≤ 0.02) were associated with higher patient effective dose. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the stone volume, positive preoperative bladder urine culture, and MIP procedure (all p values ≤0.02) were associated with postoperative infectious complications. vmPCNL was not associated with the SF rate. Conclusions: Mini-PCNL performed with continuous active suction is associated with lower rates of infectious complications, shorter OT, and lower patient effective dose than MIP.

Risk factors for deterioration of renal function after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi

Background

Nowadays, it has not been reported in detail which factors have adverse effects on renal function after PNCL surgery in solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi. To evaluate the risk factors that deteriorate the renal function in solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi between March 2014 and Jun 2019. Renal function-related indexes were collected pre-operatively, and at 1 and 6 months post-operatively. These pre- and post-operative indexes were compared to study the risk factors on renal function.

Results

Totally 71 solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi were included with a male-to-female ratio of 53:18 and mean age of 54.3±10.2 years old. The mean pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine were 55.1±18.9 mL/min/1.73 m² and 130.9±41.0 µmol/L, respectively. The mean diameter of largest stones was 5.0±1.7 cm, and the stone-free rate was 71.8%. Univariate analysis showed urinary tract infection (UTI) was a significant risk factor for deteriorating renal function after PCNL. At 1 to 6 months after surgery, renal function deteriorated by both UTI and combined diseases. The surgical side at the right kidney, mild hydronephrosis, and surgical time without 20 min or beyond 40 min can deteriorate renal function. Multivariate analysis demonstrated UTI was the main factor leading to deteriorated renal function with increasing serum creatinine and declining eGFR.

Conclusions

Preoperative UTI can deteriorate the renal function at 1 month after PCNL, and diabetes can deteriorate the postoperative renal function at 6 months after PCNL. Controlled perioperative UTI, diabetes and factors play a crucial role in protecting renal function after PCNL for solitary kidney patients with staghorn calculi.

Percutaneous Cystolitholapaxy Using the LithoClast Trilogy for Multiple Bladder Stones

Background: Multiple large bladder calculi are traditionally managed through open cystolithotomy or transurethrally in patients who have an open bladder neck. Open procedures are technically challenging in patients who may have had multiple previous open surgeries, and may be associated with significant morbidity in patients with a high comorbid burden. Therefore, a percutaneous approach to such stones has been used especially when there is a closed bladder neck, and has been shown to be effective. There are a number of available devices for breaking stones in these approaches, the newest of which is the LithoClast Trilogy™ (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) device, a probe that provides ultrasonic and mechanical calculi fragmentation and suction in a single instrument. Case Presentation: We describe the first reported case of percutaneous cystolitholapaxy using the LithoClast Trilogy device in a 41-year-old woman with spina bifida, and multiple large bladder calculi with a history of ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff formation, and a bladder neck closure for neuropathic bladder. The calculi measured 31 and 25 mm, and had a volume of 19.6 and 7.9 cm³ and average HU of 408 and 462, respectively. The calculi were composed of 37% calcium phosphate and 63% magnesium ammonium phosphate. Conclusion: We demonstrate that this approach can be used as a viable alternative to open surgery, which is of particular importance for complex patients who have undergone multiple previous open operations, and who may have a high comorbid burden.

RIRS with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath versus MPCNL for the Treatment of 2-4 cm Renal Stone

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of outcomes between RIRS with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (V-UAS) and MPCNL in the treatment of renal stone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

28 patients with 2-4 cm renal stone were treated using RIRS with 14/16 F V-UAS. The outcomes were compared to those who underwent MPCNL with 16 F Amplatz sheath using a matched-pair analysis in a 1 : 2 scenario. Matching criteria included stone size, location and laterality, gender, age, BMI, and degree of hydronephrosis. Patients' demographics, perioperative and postoperative characteristics, complications, stone-free rate (SFR), and auxiliary procedures were compared.

RESULTS

Mean operative times for the RIRS and MPCNL groups were 72.4 ± 21.3 minutes and 67.4 ± 25 minutes (P = 0.042). Postoperative pain was significantly less in the RIRS group. The initial SFR was 50% for the RIRS group and 73.2% for the MPCNL group (P = 0.035). The final SFR at postoperative three months improved to 89.3% for the RIRS group and 92.9% for the MPCNL group (P = 0.681). The auxiliary procedure rates were higher in the RIRS group (42.9% vs. 25%, P = 0.095). The overall complication rate in the RIRS group was lower, but the significant difference was not found.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of 2-4 cm renal stone, using V-UAS in RIRS can improve surgical efficiency with lower postoperative early pain scores. Comparing with MPCNL, its initial SFR was more depressed, and there is still a trend towards requiring more auxiliary procedures to achieve comparable final SFR.

Risk Factors for Urosepsis after Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection

The purpose of this study was to assess risk factors of urosepsis after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in patients with preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and to explore preventive measures. Between 2008 and 2016, patients with preoperative UTI who underwent MPCNL for upper urinary tract stones were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into nonurosepsis and urosepsis groups. Perioperative outcomes of all patients were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Risk factors for post-MPCNL urosepsis were investigated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. A total of 843 patients including 22 patients with postoperative urosepsis (urosepsis group) and 821 patients without urosepsis (nonurosepsis group) were finally included in this study. All patients with postoperative urosepsis were cured and discharged after treatment. In univariate analysis it was demonstrated that the incidence of urosepsis after MPCNL was significantly correlated with channel size (P=0.001), surgical time (P=0.003), as well as the tear of the collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla (P=0.004). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that smaller channel size (OR = 11.192, 95% CI: 2.425-51.650, P=0.002), longer surgical time (OR = 6.762, 95% CI: 1.712-17.844, P=0.008), and tear of collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla (OR = 5.531, 95% CI 1.228-14.469, P=0.012) were independent risk factors for urosepsis following MPCNL in patients with preoperative UTI. In conclusion, in patients with preoperative UTI undergoing MPCNL for upper urinary tract stones, smaller channel size, prolonged operation time, as well as tear of the collection system and percutaneous renal channel crossing the renal papilla are independent risk factors for postoperative urosepsis. Therefore, it is indicated that, in clinical practice, it is of great significance to choose appropriate channel size and avoid renal injury and control surgical time to prevent the urosepsis after MPCNL in patients with preoperative UTI.

Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience

Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures have gained increased popularity in recent years. They aim to reduce percutaneous tract size in order to lower complication rates, while maintaining high stone-free rates. Recently, miniaturized PCNL techniques have further expanded, and can currently be classified into mini-PCNL, minimally invasive PCNL (MIP), Chinese mini-PCNL (MPCNL), ultra-mini-PCNL (UMP), micro-PCNL, mini-micro-PCNL, and super-mini-PCNL (SMP). However, despite its minimally-invasive nature, its potential superiority in terms of safety and efficacy when compared to conventional PCNL is still under debate. The aim of this review is to summarise different available modalities of miniaturized PCNL, details of instruments involved, and their corresponding safety and efficacy. In particular, this article highlights the role of the SMP and our experience with this novel technique in management of urolithiasis. Overall, miniaturized PCNL techniques appear to be safe and effective alternatives to conventional PCNL for both adult and pediatric patients. Well-designed, randomized studies are required to further investigate and identify specific roles of miniaturized PCNL techniques before considering them as standard rather than alternative procedures to conventional PCNL.

Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre

OBJECTIVE

We report on the comparison of clinical results of the early phase of implementation of minimally invasive PNL (MIP) in a mentor-based approach with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2010 until January 2015 MIP was performed in 190 patients. Stone and patient characteristics were recorded in prospective manner. Perioperative complications were recorded within the Clavien-Classification. The first 120 consecutive patients undergoing MIP were evaluated and divided into three groups of 40 patients each. Mentor-based introduction of MIP was done within the first 40 patients (group A). Further patients were treated on routine clinical practice basis (group B and C). Treatment outcome was compared within the three groups.

RESULTS

The groups did not significantly differ with regard to patient characteristics, operation time and decline in haemoglobin. In the mentor-based series mean stone size was 21.7 ± 12.6 vs. 15.6 ± 7.9 and 16.1 ± 8.4 mm in group B and C (p = 0.033). Primary stone-free rates were 65, 87.5 and 87.5% for the three groups (p = 0.015). Stone-free rate was higher in smaller and simple stones. Overall, complication rate was 41.7% including 36.7% Clavien grade I and II complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MIP can be implemented safe and effectively with mentor-based approach. MIP has a high safety profile, which allows high safety and efficacy of MIP at the time of implementation.

Mini PCNL for renal calculi: does size matter?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) system for renal calculi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) procedures with the MIP system were enrolled. Patient position, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, puncture location, stone clearance, postoperative drainage and complications were recorded, and features unique to MIP were noted.

RESULTS

In all, 30 patients underwent 32 mPCNL procedures. The mean stone size was 17 (10.75-21.25) mm and the mean number of stones was 1 (1-2). The median stone clearance rate was 96.5 (95-100)%. The complication rate was 9.3%. No patient required a transfusion. In addition to these outcomes, we noted that the MIP system has many advantages over conventional PCNL (cPCNL). It is easy to learn and can be performed in both supine and prone positions. It is safe for supracostal puncture, provides excellent access to nearly all calyces and upper ureter, has multiple stone treatment options, can be used as an adjunct to cPCNL, and can be performed as a tubeless procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our experience with the MIP system has shown several advantages over cPCNL. mPCNL with the MIP system has several features that suggest it should be considered as an alternative or adjunct to cPCNL, ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel

CONTEXT

Miniaturized instruments for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), utilizing tracts sized ≤22 Fr, have been developed in an effort to reduce the morbidity and increase the efficiency of stone removal compared with standard PNL (>22 Fr).

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the efficacy and safety of miniaturized PNL for removing renal calculi.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Since it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, the data were summarized in a narrative synthesis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After screening 2945 abstracts, 18 studies were included (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], six nonrandomized comparative studies, and 10 case series). Thirteen studies were full-text articles and five were only available as congress abstracts. The size of tracts used in miniaturized procedures ranged from 22 Fr to 4.8 Fr. The largest mean stone size treated using small instruments was 980mm². Stone-free rates were comparable in miniaturized and standard PNL procedures. Procedures performed with small instruments tended to be associated with significantly lower blood loss, while the procedure duration tended to be significantly longer. Other complications were not notably different between PNL types. Study designs and populations were heterogeneous. Study limitations included selection and outcome reporting bias, as well as a lack of information on relevant confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies suggest that miniaturized PNL is at least as efficacious and safe as standard PNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only two of which were RCTs. Furthermore, the tract sizes used and types of stones treated were heterogeneous. Hence, the risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Removing kidney stones via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) using smaller sized instruments (mini-PNL) appears to be as effective and safe as using larger (traditional) instruments, but more clinical research is needed.

Superperc: A new technique in minimally-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Introduction:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone significant changes in recent years in the quest for improving efficacy and reducing morbidity. Newer minimally-invasive modalities of PCNL such as mini-PCNL, ultra-mini PCNL, and micro-PCNL have evolved with advancement in optics and technology. However, with these newer advancements, migration of small fragments produced with laser lithotripsy remains a concern, which may result in incomplete stone clearance. We describe a new technique of PCNL termed “Superperc”, that utilizes suction to remove all the fragments and maintain one-way flow.

Methods:

This was a prospective observational study involving 52 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL with the Superperc technique from April 2014 to June 2015. Surgery was performed using a pediatric ureteroscope used as a nephroscope and a specially designed sheath with a suction attachment. The Superperc uses a 10/12 F tract size, specially designed Superperc sheath (Shah Sheath) with suction mechanism and a pediatric ureteroscope (4.5/6 Fr, Richard Wolf) as nephroscope.

Results:

The mean age of the group was 41.8 years (range 6–84) with 33 males and 19 females. Mean stone size was 19.11 mm (range 10–37 mm) and mean operative time was 40.9 min (range 26–92 min). Twenty-seven renal units had upper calyceal puncture, whereas 12 had middle, 8 lower calyceal and 5 had two punctures. DJ stent was placed in 20 patients, whereas 32 patients were totally tubeless. Only three patients required a nephrostomy tube. The mean hemoglobin drop was 0.32 g with no blood transfusion. Postoperatively, three patients had a mild fever and one had transient hematuria. The stone clearance rate in our study was 96.15% and the mean hospital stay was 31.5 h (range 22–76 h).

Conclusion:

Superperc is a new technique of minimally-invasive PCNL and can be successfully done with minimal modification in armamentarium, with the potential advantage of good stone clearance.

Miniaturization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy Smaller, but better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures have reached big popularity in the past years. Following the idea that decreasing the diameter of the instruments would decrease the complication rate instruments with outer diameter down to 4,8 Fr was established. In this review, we want to take a critical insight of the most popular miniaturized procedures, regarding the key advantages and disadvantages of the miniaturized instruments.

RECENT FINDINGS

For all techniques displayed, a number of studies are available to support their effectivity in the given range of indication. Naturally, the body of evidence for M-sized instruments is largest, as it exists in the armamentarium since long, whereas studies comparing small or extrasmall and extraextrasmall to standard or among each other are rare. However, large studies comparing miniaturized procedures with conventional PCNL in randomized controlled fashion are still lacking, too.

SUMMARY

Miniaturization and attending developments such as ultrasonographic-guided puncture, single step dilatation of the tract, low irrigation pressure in open systems and a tubeless procedure lead to lower complication rates in PCNL. All of the established procedures have their own range of indication with regard to size and location of the stone. They amplified the possibility of a customized therapy for each patient.

Mitrofanoff cystolitholopaxy and bladder biopsy using a mini-PCNL kit

Bladder calculi are a common complication of urinary tract augmentation with an incidence of up to 50%.1 Aside from traditional transurethral approaches, management options include lithotripsy,2 or hybrid techniques using a combination of endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches. 3 Although Mitrofanoff cystolitholopaxy has been previously described,4 we describe a further modification of the technique with concomitant bladder biopsy in a neuropathic patient using a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) kit.

Minimally invasive versus conventional large-bore percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large-sized renal calculi: Surgeon's preference?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of patients with large renal stone burden. MIP has proven its efficacy and safety in the management of small renal calculi. However, conventional PCNL is still considered the standard method for treatment of large renal stones in the upper urinary tract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of two longitudinal databases in two tertiary referral centres for complex stone disease identified 133 consecutive patients who were treated by either MIP or PCNL for renal stones 20 mm or larger between January 2009 and August 2012. Clinical data and outcome measures of the two methods were compared by Student's t test, chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly shorter and hospital stay was significantly longer in conventional PCNL compared to MIP (p = 0.002 and < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in primary stone-free rate or complication rate between the two methods. Only higher graded complications (above Clavien grade II) were significantly more common in conventional PCNL (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

MIP is equally effective as conventional PCNL in the treatment of large renal calculi. Both methods have a similar complication rate. The shorter operative time in PCNL may be based on the larger diameter and quicker retrieval of large fragments; the longer mean hospital stay may be caused by the handling of the nephrostomy tube. The current data suggest that the choice of the method mainly depends on the surgeon's preference.

Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of patients with medullary sponge kidney

The purpose of this study was to review the safety and efficacy of the minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of medullary sponge kidney patients with complex renal calculi. Sixteen medullary sponge kidney patients with complex renal calculi underwent minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures in our center were entered into this retrospective study. The data analyzed included patients' demographics, stone burden, operative time, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications according to the modified Clavien system, and stone-free rate. All the patients in this study had complex renal stones that included 14 multiple stones and 3 partial staghorn calculi. The mean stone surface area was 779.5 ± 421.1 mm(2). Preoperative urinary tract infection was noted in 5 (31.2 %) patients. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy was successfully completed in 15 renal units in 14 patients. Two patients failed the procedure. The mean operative time was 87.3 ± 32.3 min. Mean hemoglobin drop was 25.3 ± 16.5 g/L. An initial stone-free rate of 60 % was achieved after the procedure, and the final stone-free rate was 86.6 % after auxiliary second look and/or shock-wave lithotripsy. Clavien grade I and II complications occurred in 3 (21.4 %) patients including the one (7.1 %) patient who required transfusion. All the complications were managed conservatively. No major complications occurred. This retrospective analysis confirmed that minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy was a safe alternative treatment for the medullary sponge kidney patients with complex renal calculi. This procedure provided an acceptable stone-free rate and low incidence of high-grade complications. Stone-free rate further could be further improved with auxiliary procedures.

Introducing a Novel In Vitro Model to Characterize Hydrodynamic Effects of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Systems

PURPOSE

To widen the understanding of the fluid mechanics during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a new in vitro model for empiric studies was developed. Our first aim was to characterize common PCNL systems with regard to their intrapyelocaliceal pressure and their irrigation flow volume as possible parameters of hydrodynamic invasiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The model is based on a watertight cylindrical cast. Low pressure miniaturized PCNL (miniPCNL) systems and conventional PCNL systems were tested. Intrapelvic pressure and the total of irrigation flow volume per minute were measured for each PCNL system at 10 predefined levels of irrigation pressure between 40 and 130 cm H2O.

RESULTS

Linear regression showed a linear relation between irrigation pressure and intrapelvic pressure. Compared with miniPCNL systems, conventional PCNL sheaths with closed Rutner sidearm generate significantly higher intrapelvic pressures. Opening the Rutner sidearm leads to a decrease in intrapelvic pressure to the level of the open mini PCNL systems. Polynomal regression revealed a square root relation between irrigation pressure and irrigation flow volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro model is suitable for obtaining reliable and valid data of intrapelvic pressure and irrigation flow volume of commonly used PCNL systems. Conventional PCNL sheaths with opened Rutner sidearm provide intrapelvic pressure and irrigation volume similar to miniPCNL. Consequently, a relevant difference of the hydrodynamic impact between conventional and miniPCNL systems are not necessarily to be assumed. Regression analysis revealed a new starting point for further empiric research of fluid mechanics during PCNL.

A novel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique: safety and efficacy report

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and determine the complications of ultrasound-guided 16 F tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by review of over 1000 cases in a Chinese hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 1368 patients underwent 16 F tract PCNL in the hospital between March 2007 and July 2013. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia in all cases. Central venous puncture was chosen as a puncture device. Complications, residual stones, stone clearance and the need for auxiliary treatments were evaluated. Management experience was evaluated with respect to the complications.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 275 out of 1368 patients (20.1%). There were 102 Clavien grade 1 (7.4%), 121 grade 2 (8.8%) and 48 grade 3 (3.5%) complications, but no grade 4 or 5 complications. Access to the kidney was established in 99.7% of cases and 82.0% of cases had complete stone clearance without undergoing further PCNL. Auxiliary treatments included shockwave lithotripsy in 135 patients, second-phase PCNL in 49 patients and ureteroscopy in 63 patients. Three cases of rare complications occurred, including a double-J stent translocated to the chest, and intraoperative acute pulmonary edema and heart failure. Severe intraoperative or postoperative complications should be managed immediately.

CONCLUSION

An ultrasound-guided mini-tract PCNL is safe and convenient, even for patients with complicated stones.

A prospective comparative study of haemodynamic, electrolyte, and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVES

To report the haemodynamic, electrolyte, and metabolic changes of a prospective clinical trial comparing minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal stones.

METHODS

In all, 71 patients who had undergone MPCNL (37) or PCNL (34) were prospectively assessed. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were monitored, and samples for electrolyte estimation and arterial blood gas analysis were drawn at the start, 30th, 60th, 90th, and 120th min of irrigation and 24 h later after both procedures.

RESULTS

In the PCNL group, no significant changes occurred in heart rate, arterial blood pressure, electrolytes, and pH. In the MPCNL group, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and serum sodium levels kept stably during and after irrigation; the decrease in potassium levels was found from the 30th to 120th min of irrigation and did not recovery until 24 h later after operation (P < 0.05), but the potassium levels was normal during the entire observation period; the increase in Cl(-) levels was noted at the 120th min of irrigation (P < 0.05); there was a decreasing trend of pH from the start to the 120th min of irrigation (P < 0.05) and 24 h later after operation this trend attenuated (P < 0.05); the changes in base excess levels were in accordance with those in pH levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Although haemodynamic and electrolyte changes remains stable, a trend towards metabolic acidosis is obvious as the irrigation time goes by during MPCNL compared with PCNL. Therefore, arterial blood gases should be monitored during and after MPCNL in patients with prolonged irrigation time.

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study of the management of small and large renal stones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP) between small (<2 cm) and large (>2 cm) renal calculi, because although MIP has proved its efficacy in small lower caliceal stones, the efficacy in large renal calculi has been questioned.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data from 191 consecutive minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) procedures at a single institution from January 2007 to March 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. All stone sizes and complexity were included (98 were <2 cm and 93 were ≥ 2 cm). We performed a comparative analysis of procedures for calculi <2 cm and ≥ 2 cm regarding the stone-free rate, the need for auxiliary procedures, and complications. The Student t test for parametric continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fischer's exact test for nominal variables were applied.

RESULTS

The primary stone-free rate was significantly lower for the large than for the small stones (76.3% vs 90.8%, P = .007), and the secondary stone-free rate after one auxiliary procedure (second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureterorenoscopy, or shock wave lithotripsy) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (94.6% vs 98.9%, P = .1). The total complication rate was not significantly different (26.9% vs 19.4%, P = .2) between the 2 groups either. Grade III complications occurred in 5.2% of all patients, and no grade IV or V complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Using MIP, the total stone-free rate was greater for the small than for the large calculi; however, most patients could be rendered stone-free with the use of one auxiliary procedure. The high success rate and low rate of higher grade complications justify the application of MIP for large stones.

Considerations in minimally invasive surgery for renal and ureteric calculi: a bicenter quality control study

BACKGROUND

The use of minimally invasive surgery is increasing. Evaluating the quality of care brings new sights in the optimization of operating techniques.

METHODS

We included all procedures performed in two hospitals during 2010 and 2011. A total of 264 patients were included in the ureterorenoscopy (URS) group and 77 patients in the percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) group. Data were gathered by retrospectively reviewing medical records.

RESULTS

Mean stone diameter in the URS group was 9 mm. Patients suffered from a single stone in 79% of the cases. Calculi in the distal ureter, defined as the part of the ureter below the lower border of the sacroiliac joint, were most likely to be removed. A stone-free status was reached in 69% of the cases using URS. Mean stone diameter in the PCNL group was 23 mm. PCNL was successful in 70% of the cases in Haga Hospital versus 53% in Medisch Centrum Haaglanden. Incidence of complications was comparable between the hospitals (p = 0.5). Outcome and quality of both PCNL and URS was not influenced by sex, age or body mass index.

CONCLUSION

The clinical results were comparable with results in the literature. Further improvement can be made by optimization of technical aspects and centralization of treatment by urologists experienced in minimally invasive techniques.