Single application of high-intensity focused ultrasound as a first-line therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes

MRI/real-time ultrasound image fusion guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: a prospective comparative and functional analysis of different ablative techniques

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper was to compare safety and functional outcomes of total, hemi and focal ablation by the latest focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device.

METHODS

This is a prospective study including patients with low to intermediate-risk PCa treated with HIFU by Focal One^® device from 11/2018 to 3/2020. Before the treatment all patients underwent mp-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and standard biopsy. Patients were stratified according to the type of ablation: total, hemi- or focal ablation. Functional data (IPSS, Quality of Life [QoL], IIEF-5, maximum flow [Qmax] and post void residual [PVR] at flowmetry) were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Moreover, the urinary symptoms reported by patients at IPSS questionnaire were divided in "irritative" and "obstructive" and compared.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were enrolled. Median prostate volume and lesion diameter were 46 (IQR 25-75) mL and 10 (IQR 6-13) mm. 15, 50 and 35 patients underwent total, hemi- and focal ablation, respectively. No differences were found between them except for operative time (lower in the focal group, P<0.01). Significant lower incidence of irritative symptoms was identified in the focal group compared to the others (P<0.05 at 1 and 3 months of follow-up). No differences were found among the baseline status and the postoperative assessment in terms of obstructive IPSS items, IIEF-5, QoL, Qmax and PVR (all P value>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that patients' specific HIFU tailoring with the MRI/real-time TRUS Guidance by Focal One^® device is able to minimize the side effects of treatment.

Pre-Exposure to Stress-Inducing Agents Increase the Anticancer Efficacy of Focused Ultrasound against Aggressive Prostate Cancer Cells

Despite the initial success in treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa) using surgery, radiation or hormonal therapy, recurrence of aggressive tumors dictates morbidity and mortality. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is being tested as a targeted, noninvasive approach to eliminate the localized PCa foci, and strategies to enhance the anticancer potential of FUS have a high translational value. Since aggressive cancer cells utilize oxidative stress (Ox-stress) and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-stress) pathways for their survival and recurrence, we hypothesized that pre-treatment with drugs that disrupt stress-signaling pathways in tumor cells may increase FUS efficacy. Using four different PCa cell lines, i.e., LNCaP, C4-2B, 22Rv1 and DU145, we tested the in vitro effects of FUS, alone and in combination with two clinically tested drugs that increase Ox-stress (i.e., CDDO-me) or ER-stress (i.e., nelfinavir). As compared to standalone FUS, significant (p < 0.05) suppressions in both survival and recurrence of PCa cells were observed following pre-sensitization with low-dose CDDO-me (100 nM) and/or nelfinavir (2 µM). In drug pre-sensitized cells, significant anticancer effects were evident at a FUS intensity of as low as 0.7 kW/cm². This combined mechanochemical disruption (MCD) approach decreased cell proliferation, migration and clonogenic ability and increased apoptosis/necrosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Furthermore, although activated in cells that survived standalone FUS, pre-sensitization with CDDO-me and/or nelfinavir suppressed both total and activated (phosphorylated) NF-κB and Akt protein levels. Thus, a combined MCD therapy may be a safe and effective approach towards the targeted elimination of aggressive PCa cells.

Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy: Quality of Life and Functional Outcome

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate toxicity, oncological and functional outcome, and quality of life after salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy.

METHODS

A total of 13 patients undergoing salvage radiotherapy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer recurrence after HIFU therapy were included and followed up every 3 months. Oncological outcome (by PSA measurements), toxicity (according to CTCAE criteria), and functional outcome were evaluated. Quality of life was assessed by standardized questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months after salvage treatment.

RESULTS

Median age of patients was 80 years (interquartile range [IQR] 75-82). Patients underwent normofractionated salvage radiotherapy with median 73.6 Gy. PSA nadir was reached at 6 months and was 0.2 ng/mL. Median follow-up was 76 months (IQR 55-96). Biochemical recurrence occurred in 3 patients (23.1%) at a median of 36.4 months. No gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity ≥ grade 3 was noted during follow-up. Early and late grade II GI toxicity occurred in 1 patient (7.7%), respectively. GU toxicity grade II was noted in up to 53.8% at 3 months and 61.5% at 12 months. In terms of health-related quality of life, there was no statistically significant difference at 3 and 12 months compared to the baseline. Only differences were seen in sexual functioning (3 and 12 months) and in diarrhea (3 months), affecting patients' wellbeing.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Salvage radiotherapy after HIFU treatment can be performed safely, thereby providing acceptable recurrence-free survival without severe impact on post-interventional quality of life.

Determining lines of therapy in patients with solid cancers: a proposed new systematic and comprehensive framework

The complexity of neoplasia and its treatment are a challenge to the formulation of general criteria that are applicable across solid cancers. Determining the number of prior lines of therapy (LoT) is critically important for optimising future treatment, conducting medication audits, and assessing eligibility for clinical trial enrolment. Currently, however, no accepted set of criteria or definitions exists to enumerate LoT. In this article, we seek to open a dialogue to address this challenge by proposing a systematic and comprehensive framework to determine LoT uniformly across solid malignancies. First, key terms, including LoT and 'clinical progression of disease' are defined. Next, we clarify which therapies should be assigned a LoT, and why. Finally, we propose reporting LoT in a novel and standardised format as LoT N (CLoT + PLoT), where CLoT is the number of systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT) administered with curative intent and/or in the early setting, PLoT is the number of SACT given with palliative intent and/or in the advanced setting, and N is the sum of CLoT and PLoT. As a next step, the cancer research community should develop and adopt standardised guidelines for enumerating LoT in a uniform manner.

Oncologic outcome, side effects and comorbidity of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for localized prostate cancer. A review

Introduction

Prostate cancer is considered one of the most important health problems. Due to the increased number of diagnosed patients and the inability to distinguish aggressive tumors, minimally-invasive procedures have become increasingly interesting. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an alternative option to radical surgery to treat prostate cancer. To date, however, data on side effects and comorbidities of this technique are still not conclusive.

Methods and results

We reviewed the literature to concentrate on side effects and comorbidities of HIFU treatment of prostate cancer with the following key words: hifu, high intensity focused ultrasound, ultrasonic therapy, transrectal hifu, prostate ablation, side effects, comorbidities. MedLine and Embase via Ovid database were searched. Selection criteria were: English language, articles published between 2001 and 2015, case series including at least 100 participants and reported data on side effects and comorbidities. Sixteen uncontrolled studies were identified. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) were found in the literature comparing side effects and comorbidities of HIFU to other routine approaches to prostate cancer treatment.

Conclusion

HIFU seems to be a promising minimally-invasive treatment for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, especially for patients who are unfit for radical surgery. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods and RCT are required to properly assess the impact of side effects and comobidities related to the HIFU technique in comparison with other therapies to treat prostate cancer.

•

HIFU is a promising minimally-invasive treatment for prostate cancer, especially in patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease.

•

To date, the most proper indication to HIFU is for patients who are not fit for, or are unwilling to undergo, radical surgery.

•

The most common complications are impotence, urinary incontinence, acute urinary retention and urethral fistula.

•

High-intensity focused ultrasound is a safe and effective procedure.

Phenotypic alterations in liver cancer cells induced by mechanochemical disruption

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly fatal disease recognized as a growing global health crisis worldwide. Currently, no curative treatment is available for early-to-intermediate stage HCC, characterized by large and/or multifocal tumors. If left untreated, HCC rapidly progresses to a lethal stage due to favorable conditions for metastatic spread. Mechanochemical disruption of cellular structures can potentially induce phenotypic alterations in surviving tumor cells that prevent HCC progression. In this paper, HCC response to mechanical vibration via high-intensity focused ultrasound and a chemical disruptive agent (ethanol) was examined in vitro and in vivo. Our analysis revealed that mechanochemical disruption caused a significant overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in multiple HCC cell lines (HepG2, PLC/PRF/5, and Hep3B). This led to a decrease in cell viability and long-term proliferation due to increased expression and activity of death receptors TNFR1 and Fas. The cells that survived mechanochemical disruption had a reduced expression of cancer stem cell markers (CD133, CD90, CD49f) and a diminished colony-forming ability. Mechanochemical disruption also impeded HCC migration and their adhesion to vascular endothelium, two critical processes in hematogenous metastasis. The HCC transformation to a non-tumorigenic phenotype post mechanochemical disruption was confirmed by a lack of tumor spheroid formation in vitro and complete tumor regression in vivo. These results show that mechanochemical disruption inhibits uncontrolled proliferation and reduces tumorigenicity and aggressiveness of HCC cells through ROS overproduction and associated activation of TNF- and Fas-mediated cell death signaling. Our study identifies a novel curative therapeutic approach that can prevent the development of aggressive HCC phenotypes.

Mechanochemical Disruption Suppresses Metastatic Phenotype and Pushes Prostate Cancer Cells toward Apoptosis

Chemical-based medicine that targets specific oncogenes or proteins often leads to cancer recurrence due to tumor heterogeneity and development of chemoresistance. This challenge can be overcome by mechanochemical disruption of cancer cells via focused ultrasound (FUS) and sensitizing chemical agents such as ethanol. We demonstrate that this disruptive therapy decreases the viability, proliferation rate, tumorigenicity, endothelial adhesion, and migratory ability of prostate cancer cells in vitro. It sensitized the cells to TNFR1-- and Fas--mediated apoptosis and reduced the expression of metastatic markers CD44 and CD29. Using a prostate cancer xenograft model, we observed that the mechanochemical disruption led to complete tumor regression in vivo. This switch to a nonaggressive cell phenotype was caused by ROS and Hsp70 overproduction and subsequent impairment of NFκB signaling. FUS induces mechanical perturbations of diverse cancer cell populations, and its combination with agents that amplify and guide remedial cellular responses can stop lethal cancer progression. IMPLICATIONS: Mechanochemical disruption therapy in which FUS is combined with ethanol can be curative for locally aggressive and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Primary whole-gland ablation for localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: The important predictors of biochemical recurrence

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictive factors of biochemical recurrence for patients undergoing high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients receiving whole-gland prostate ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer from 2009 to 2015. All the patients received pre-high-intensity focused ultrasound radical transurethral resection of the prostate. We included perioperative parameters as follows: age, preoperative prostate volume, stage of operation, initial prostate-specific antigen, T stage, postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir, Gleason score, time to prostate-specific antigen nadir and the presence of prostate-specific antigen biochemical recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for investigating predictors of recurrence, and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used for the cut-off values of prostate-specific antigen nadir.

RESULTS

Among 182 patients, 26.9% had prostate-specific antigen biochemical recurrence after high-intensity focused ultrasound during the median follow-up period of 32.21 months. Gleason score ≥7 (Gleason score 7, hazard ratio 2.877, P = 0.027), stage ≥T2b (T2b, hazard ratio 3.16, P = 0.027) and prostate-specific antigen nadir (hazard ratio 1.11, P < 0.001) were statistically significant, whereas there was no significance in prostate volume and initial prostate-specific antigen. We posit that a cut-off level of prostate-specific antigen nadir 0.43 ng/mL might be considered as an independent predictive factor for prostate-specific antigen biochemical recurrence in high-intensity focused ultrasound patients in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001, hazard ratio 7.39, 95% confidence interval 3.56-15.37), and created a new nadir-related prediction model for biochemical recurrence prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.43 ng/mL can be considered an important predictive factor for biochemical recurrence in primary whole-prostate gland high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment, and the nadir-related prediction model might provide a reference for early salvage treatment. Furthermore, Gleason score ≥7, stage ≥T2b might be associated with unfavorable outcomes, although prostate volume and higher initial prostate-specific antigen appear not to be associated with biochemical recurrence for the high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment.

Quality of life and functional outcome after infravesical desobstruction and HIFU treatment for localized prostate cancer

Background

To evaluate quality of life, functional and oncological outcome after infravesical desobstruction and HIFU treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Methods

One hundred thirty-one patients, treated with TURP and HIFU in a single institution were followed up for oncological and functional outcome. Oncological outcome was quantified by biochemical recurrence free survival using the Stuttgart and Phoenix criteria. Quality of life was assessed by usage of standardized QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires. In addition, functional questionnaires such as IPSS and IIEF-5 were used. Complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results

One hundred thirty-one patients with a mean age of 72.8 years (SD: 6.0) underwent HIFU for prostate cancer (29.0% low risk, 58.8% intermediate risk, 12.2% high risk). PSA nadir was 0.6 ng/ml (SD: 1.2) after a mean of 4.6 months (SD: 5.7). Biochemical recurrence free survival defined by Stuttgart criteria was 73.7%, 84.4% and 62.5% for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients after 22.2 months. Complications were grouped according to Clavien-Dindo and occurred in 10.7% (grade II) and 11.5% (grade IIIa) of cases. 35.1% of patients needed further treatment for bladder neck stricture. Regarding incontinence, 14.3%, 2.9% and 0% of patients had de novo urinary incontinence grade I°, II° and III° and 3.8% urge incontinence due to HIFU treatment. Patients were asked for the ability to have intercourse: 15.8%, 58.6% and 66.7% of patients after non-, onesided and bothsided nervesparing procedure were able to obtain sufficient erection for intercourse, respectively. Regarding quality of life, mean global health score according to QLQ-C30 was 69.4%.

Conclusion

HIFU treatment for localized prostate cancer shows acceptable oncological safety. Quality of life after HIFU is better than in the general population and ranges within those of standard treatment options compared to literature. HIFU seems a safe valuable treatment alternative for patients not suitable for standard treatment.

Guidance on patient consultation. Current evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in healthy men and treatment options for men with proven localised prostate cancer

The main objective of this review is to summarise, for primary and secondary care doctors, the management options and current supporting evidence for clinically localised prostate cancer. We review all aspects of management including current guidelines on early cancer detection and the importance of informed consent on PSA-based screening and assess the most common treatment options and the evidence for managing patients with low-, medium-, and high-risk disease.

Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focussed Ultrasound for Localised Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

High-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) has been used for 10 yr to treat localised prostate cancer (PCa).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systematically the evidence on the efficacy and side effects of HIFU in the primary treatment of localised PCa.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a critical review and appraisal of Medline (Ovid), PreMedline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews publications on HIFU up to May 2013. One systematic review and 18 primary studies, all case series, were eligible.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Outcomes were summarised and evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Low-quality evidence suggests an overall survival rate after Ablatherm HIFU ranging from 80% to 89% for >5 yr. The PCa survival rate ranges from 97% to 99% for >5 yr. Effect of HIFU on quality of life remains undetermined. Erectile dysfunction was the most frequent adverse event reported from zero but up to 74% of patients. Adverse events affecting the urinary tract occurred in 0.7-31% of patients, bladder outlet obstruction in 4-51.5%, and they were more frequent in patients who had transurethral resection of the prostate the same day or within 2 d of HIFU. Outcomes vary for low- and high-risk categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Good quality evidence on the efficacy of HIFU treatment for localised PCa is lacking.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed all the data on treatment with high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) for localised prostate cancer (PCa). The quality of the evidence is very low because the information is based on a series of patients who received HIFU treatment with no comparison with active surveillance or radical treatment. Case series suggest an overall survival rate up to 89% and a PCa survival rate up to 99% after 5 yr, but these numbers vary according to the patient's risk category. Longer term and effects on quality of life are unknown.

Single application of high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary therapy of localized prostate cancer: Treatment-related predictors of biochemical outcomes

Objective

Recent reports on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localized prostate cancer suggest that preoperative risk groups of tumor recurrence are strong predictors of oncological outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of treatment-related factors in relation to patient characteristics for biochemical outcomes after HIFU.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included patients treated from December 2002 to December 2010 for localized prostate cancer with two generations of Ablatherm^® HIFU devices (A1 and A2). All the patients underwent single HIFU treatment session under the concept of whole-gland therapy. Prostate surgery was performed before HIFU to downsize enlarged glands. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was discontinued before HIFU. Biochemical failure (BCF) was defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir + 1.2 ng/mL (Stuttgart definition). Predictors of BCF were determined using Cox regression models. As covariates, patient-related factors (age, tumor characteristics, ADT) were compared with treatment-related factors (prostate volume, HIFU device generation, conduct of therapy, prostate edema, patient movement, anesthetic modalities).

Results

Three hundred and twenty-three (98.8%) out of 327 consecutive patients were evaluable for BCF. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 51.2 (36.6-80.4) months. The overall BCF-rate was 23.8%. In multivariate analyses, higher initial PSA-values (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; p < 0.001) and higher D'Amico risk stages (HR: 3.45; p < 0.001) were patient-related predictors of BCF. Regarding treatment-related factors, the A2 HIFU device was associated with a decreased risk of BCF (HR: 0.51; p = 0.007), while prostate edema had an adverse effect (HR: 1.8; p = 0.027). Short follow-up and retrospective study design are the primary limitations.

Conclusion

Success in a single HIFU session depends not merely on tumor characteristics, but also on treatment-related factors. Ablation is more efficacious with the technically advanced A2 HIFU device. Heat-induced prostate edema might adversely affect the outcome.

Focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defect through enhancement of cell proliferation

A number of studies have reported the therapeutic potential of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for induction of bone repair. This study investigated whether bone regeneration might be enhanced by application of focused LIPUS to selectively stimulate fractured calvarial bone. To accomplish this, bone defects were surgically created in the middle of the skull of rats that were subsequently exposed to focused LIPUS. Bone regeneration was assessed by repeated computed tomography imaging after the operation, as well as histologic analysis with calcein, hematoxylin and eosin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen assay. At 6 wk after surgery, bone formation in the focused LIPUS-treated group improved significantly relative to the control. Interestingly, new bone tissue sprouted from focused LIPUS target points. Histologic analysis after exposure to focused LIPUS revealed that proliferating cells were significantly increased relative to the control. Taken together, these results suggest that focused LIPUS can improve re-ossification through enhancement of cell proliferation in calvarial defect sites.

Single high intensity focused ultrasound session as a whole gland primary treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: 10-year outcomes

Objectives. To assess the treatment outcomes of a single session of whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods. Response rates were defined using the Stuttgart and Phoenix criteria. Complications were graded according to the Clavien score. Results. At a median follow-up of 94months, 48 (44.4%) and 50 (46.3%) patients experienced biochemical recurrence for Phoenix and Stuttgart definition, respectively. The 5- and 10-year actuarial biochemical recurrence free survival rates were 57% and 40%, respectively. The 10-year overall survival rate, cancer specific survival rate, and metastasis free survival rate were 72%, 90%, and 70%, respectively. Preoperative high risk category, Gleason score, preoperative PSA, and postoperative nadir PSA were independent predictors of oncological failure. 24.5% of patients had self-resolving LUTS, 18.2% had urinary tract infection, and 18.2% had acute urinary retention. A grade 3b complication occurred in 27 patients. Pad-free continence rate was 87.9% and the erectile dysfunction rate was 30.8%. Conclusion. Single session HIFU can be alternative therapy for patients with low risk PCa. Patients with intermediate risk should be informed about the need of multiple sessions of HIFU and/or adjuvant treatments and HIFU performed very poorly in high risk patients.

Urodynamic evaluation after high-intensity focused ultrasound for patients with prostate cancer

This prospective study assesses the impact of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) on lower urinary tract by comparing pre- and postoperative symptoms and urodynamic changes. Thirty consecutive patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer underwent urodynamic study before HIFU and then at 3–6 months after surgery. Continence status and symptoms were analyzed by means of International Prostate Symptoms Score IPSS and International Index Erectile Function IIEF5. As a result, there were a significant improvement in bladder outlet, maximum flow at uroflowmetry, and reduction in postvoid residual PVR at 6-month follow-up and a concomitant significant reduction of detrusor pressure at opening and at maximum flow. De novo overactive bladder and impaired bladder compliance were detected in 10% of patients at 3 months, with progressive improvement at longer follow-up. Baseline prostate volume and length of the procedure were predictors of 6-month IPSS score and continence status. In conclusion, following HIFU detrusor overactivity, decreased bladder compliance and urge incontinence represent de novo dysfunction due to prostate and bladder neck injury during surgery. However, urodynamic study shows a progressive improvement in all storage and voiding patterns at 6-month follow-up. Patients with high prostate volume and long procedure length suffered from irritative symptoms even at long term.

Multidisciplinary care and management selection in prostate cancer

The management of prostate cancer is complicated by the multitude of treatment options, the lack of proven superiority of one modality of management, and the presence of physician bias. Care at a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic offers patients the relative convenience of consultation with physicians of multiple specialties within the confines of a single visit and appears to serve as a venue in which patients can be counseled regarding the risks and benefits of available therapies in an open and interactive environment. Physician bias may be minimized in such an environment, and patient satisfaction rates are high. Available data suggest that low-risk patients who are seen at a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic appear to select active surveillance in greater proportion. However, relatively few studies have investigated the other added value that multidisciplinary clinics provide to the patient or health care system, and therefore, additional studies assessing the impact of multidisciplinary care in the management of patients with prostate cancer are needed.

Single session of high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer: treatment outcomes and potential effect as a primary therapy

Purpose

To investigate the treatment outcomes of a single-session high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using the Sonablate^® for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Methods

Biochemical failure was defined according to the Stuttgart definition [a rise of 1.2 ng/ml or more above the nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA)] and the Phoenix definition (a rise of 2 ng/ml or more above the nadir PSA). Disease-free survival rate was defined using the Phoenix criteria and positive follow-up biopsy.

Results

A total of 171 patients were identified. Fifty-two (30.4 %) patients were identified to be with D’Amico low risk, 47 (27.5 %) with intermediate risk, and 72 (42.1 %) with high risk. In the median follow-up time of 43 months, there was 44 (25.7 %) and 36 (21.1 %) patients experienced biochemical failure for Stuttgart and Phoenix definition with mean (±SD) time to failure of 17.8 ± 2.1 and 19.4 ± 2.3 months, respectively. A total of 44 (25.7 %) patients were diagnosed as disease failure. Cox multivariate analysis revealed PSA nadir level (PSA cutoff = 0.2 ng/ml; HR = 9.472, 95 % CI 4.527–19.820, p < 0.001) and D’amico risk groups [HR = 3.132 (95 % CI 1.251–6.389), p = 0.033] were the predictor for failure in single-session HIFU.

Conclusions

Single-session HIFU treatment using the Sonablate^® seems to be potentially curative approach. When treated carefully with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or preoperative transurethral resection of the prostate, higher-risk disease might be able to choose this minimally invasive procedure as primary therapy.

La Radioterapia Nel Trattamento Del Carcinoma Della Prostata: Indicazioni, Evoluzione Tecnologica e Approcci Integrati

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous, indolent or sometimes aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and without proved superiority. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in the disease history. Technological evolution with Intensity Modulate Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) allowed improvement, with significant results on local control and survival. Hypofractionation, Stereotactic Body RT (SBRT) and new brachytherapy approachs are still under investigation, with promising opportunities. Adjuvant vs salvage postoperative RT, hormone association, prophylactic pelvic irradiation are still under debate, but guidelines express overlapping indications.

Multidisciplinary managements will be the future for care optimization, providing the best tool for holistic and informed patients' choice.

MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound as a New Method of Drug Delivery

Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery under the guidance of an imaging modality can improve drug disposition and achieve site-specific drug delivery. The term focal drug delivery has been introduced to describe the focal targeting of drugs in tissues with the help of imaging and focused ultrasound. Focal drug delivery aims to improve the therapeutic profile of drugs by improving their specificity and their permeation in defined areas. Focused-ultrasound- (FUS-) mediated drug delivery has been applied with various molecules to improve their local distribution in tissues. FUS is applied with the aid of microbubbles to enhance the permeability of bioactive molecules across BBB and improve drug distribution in the brain. Recently, FUS has been utilised in combination with MRI-labelled liposomes that respond to temperature increase. This strategy aims to "activate" nanoparticles to release their cargo locally when triggered by hyperthermia induced by FUS. MRI-guided FUS drug delivery provides the opportunity to improve drug bioavailability locally and therefore improve the therapeutic profiles of drugs. This drug delivery strategy can be directly translated to clinic as MRg FUS is a promising clinically therapeutic approach. However, more basic research is required to understand the physiological mechanism of FUS-enhanced drug delivery.

Real-time magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound focal therapy for localised prostate cancer: preliminary experience

Five patients with unifocal, biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) evident on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were treated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation before radical prostatectomy (RP). An endorectal probe featuring a phased-array focused ultrasound transducer was positioned for lesion ablation under MRI guidance. The tissue temperature and accumulation of thermal damage in the target zone was monitored during the procedure by MRI thermometry. Overlap between the ablation area and the devascularisation of the target lesion was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI performed immediately after treatment. The procedure was uneventful, and no adverse events were observed. RP was safely performed without significant surgical difficulties in relation to the previous MRgFUS treatment. The histopathology report showed extensive coagulative necrosis, with no residual tumour in the ablated area. Significant bilateral residual tumour, not evident on pretreatment MRI, was observed outside the treated area in two patients. MRgFUS ablation of focal localised PCa is feasible and, if confirmed in appropriate studies, could represent a valid option for the focal treatment of localised PCa.