1
|
Hensley PJ, Labbate C, Zganjar A, Howard J, Huelster H, Durdin T, Pham J, Xiao L, Pallauf M, Lombardo K, Glezerman I, Singla N, Raman JD, Coleman J, Spiess PE, Margulis V, Potretzke AM, Matin SF. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Nomogram Predictive of Post-Nephroureterectomy Renal Function. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1313-1319. [PMID: 38307832 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The timing of perioperative nephrotoxic chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains controversial and strongly depends on predicted platinum eligibility after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The study objective was to develop and validate a multivariable nomogram to predict estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following RNU. METHODS This was a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with UTUC treated with RNU from 2000 to 2020 at seven high-volume referral centers. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy was risk-stratified. Patients were retrospectively randomly allocated 2:1 to discovery and validation cohorts. Discovery data were used to identify independent factors associated with GFR at 1-3 mo after RNU on linear regression, and backward selection was applied for model construction. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of predicted eGFR results within 30% of the corresponding observed eGFR. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS We included 1100 patients, of whom 733 were in the discovery and 367 were in the validation cohort. Multivariable predictors of postoperative eGFR decline included advanced age (odds ratio [OR] -0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.28 to -0.08), diabetes (OR -2.38, 95% CI -4.64 to -0.11), and hypertension (OR -2.24, 95% CI -4.16 to -0.32). Factors associated with favorable postoperative eGFR included larger tumor size (OR 10.57, 95% CI 7.4-13.74 for tumors >5 cm vs ≤2 cm) and preoperative eGFR (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.49). A composite nomogram predicted postoperative eGFR with good accuracy in both the discovery (80.5%) and validation (78.6%) cohorts. Limitations include exclusion of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS A nomogram that incorporates ubiquitous preoperative clinical variables can predict post-RNU eGFR and was validated with an independent cohort. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a tool that uses patient data to predict eligibility for chemotherapy after surgery to remove the kidney and ureter in patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Craig Labbate
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Howard
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Heather Huelster
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Urology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Trey Durdin
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Pham
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Kara Lombardo
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ilya Glezerman
- Department of Nephrology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu MZ, Chen JY, Lyu F, Gao XS, Ma MW, Li XY, Li HZ, Qin SB, Gao Y, Wang PY. Exploring Radiotherapy as a Promising Alternative for Managing Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Rescuing Chemotherapy-Intolerant Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102203. [PMID: 39241310 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients intolerant to chemotherapy. METHODS Data for 21 patients with advanced UTUC intolerant to chemotherapy were retrospectively collected. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (50-70 Gy/20-33 f) or partial-SABR boost to the lesions (50-60 Gy/20-25 f with tumor center boosted with 6-8 Gy/f, 3-5 f) for bulky tumors. RESULTS The median age was 75 years (range, 58-87 years). Primary tumor resection was performed for all patients and none underwent metastatic resection. Seventeen (81%) patients had oligometastasis (1-5 metastases) at diagnosis. Eighteen (85.7%) received irradiation to all tumor lesions. Lymph node metastasis was predominant in the whole group (17/21). Other lesions were distributed as local recurrence (7/21), bone metastases (2/21) and abdominal wall/muscle (2/21). The median follow-up time was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 15.2-48.7 months). Rate of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole group at 1 year were 90%, 46.6%, and 80.4%, respectively. At 3 years, LC, PFS and OS were 65.6%, 26.6%, and 40.9%, respectively. Fourteen patients developed acute mild gastrointestinal toxicity, generally of grade 1-2; 8 patients developed acute grade 1-2 hematological toxicity, consisting mainly of anemia and leukopenia. No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION For patients with advanced UTUC who are not able to tolerate chemotherapy, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Pei-Yan Wang
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Xu C, Mou Z, Hu Y, Yang C, Hu J, Chen X, Luo J, Zou L, Jiang H. Endoscopic Cryoablation Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:1453-1461. [PMID: 38693018 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Cryoablation is a traditional antitumor therapy with good prospects for development. The efficacy of endoscopic management as a kidney-sparing surgery for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains controversial. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of endoscopic cryoablation (ECA) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on survival outcomes, renal function, and complications. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data for 116 patients with newly diagnosed high-risk UTUC who underwent either ECA (n = 13) or RNU (n = 103) from March 25, 2019 to December 8, 2021. Propensity score matching (1:4) using the nearest neighbor method was performed before analysis. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (RFS), the change in renal function, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS At median follow-up of 28.2 mo for the ECA group and 27.6 mo for the RNU group, 2-yr OS (82% vs 84%), PFS (73% vs 71%), and intravesical RFS (81% vs 83%) rates after matching did not significantly differ. A decline in renal function was observed after RNU, but not after ECA. Five (41.7%) patients in the ECA group reported six TEAEs, and 17 patients (35.4%) in the RNU group reported 20 TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In comparison to RNU, ECA for UTUC resulted in noninferior oncological outcomes and superior preservation of renal function. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study suggests that a treatment called endoscopic cryoablation for high-risk cancer in the upper urinary tract can help in preserving kidney function, with similar survival outcomes to those after more extensive surgery. This option can be considered for selected patients with a strong preference for kidney preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiling Chen
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenyang Xu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zezhong Mou
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Hu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Yang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinzhong Hu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinan Chen
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianfeng Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Lujia Zou
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Haowen Jiang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Institute of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wong CHM, Liu K, Zhao H, Sabuncu K, Horuz R, Albayrak S, Pilar MD, Pes L, Rosette JDL, Teoh JYC. Chronic renal impairment predicts oncological outcomes in UTUC patients undergoing RNU. BMC Urol 2024; 24:250. [PMID: 39538261 PMCID: PMC11559099 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01627-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the relationship between pre-existing renal impairment and oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) using data from a multicentre international registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU were obtained from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry. Patients were categorised into normal pre-operative renal function and chronic renal impairment (CKD) groups, with CKD defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 mL/kg/1.73 m². Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to investigate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify confounding variables. RESULTS A total of 1393 patients diagnosed with UTUC who underwent RNU between 2014 and 2019 were analysed. 875 patients (62.4%) had normal renal function, whilst 528 patients (37.6%) had CKD prior to RNU. The two groups had similar proportions of bladder cancer history, comparable cardiovascular comorbidity, similar tumour stage, and comparable proportions receiving laparoscopic or robotic-assisted RNU. In multivariable cox regression analysis, CKD was found to be associated with inferior DFS (HR = 1.419; 95%CI = 1.060-1.898; p = 0.019). Upon multivariable analysis, pre-existing renal impairment and higher T stage (HR = 4.613; 95%CI = 1.829-4.712; p < 0.001) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.858; 95%CI = 1.229-2.807; p = 0.003) were also found to associate with worse DFS. Significant cardiovascular disease and higher T stage were associated with worse OS. Existing renal impairment at baseline did not have any significant associated with OS. CONCLUSION In this multicentre registry, preoperative chronic renal impairment was identified as an independent predictor of inferior DFS in patients undergoing RNU for non-metastatic UTUC. Preoperative CKD could serve as a clinical predictor of poorer oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Ho-Ming Wong
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kang Liu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hongda Zhao
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kubilay Sabuncu
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rahim Horuz
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selami Albayrak
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Del Pilar
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Laguna Pes
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roumiguié M, Seisen T, Masson-Lecomte A, Prost D, Allory Y, Xylinas E, Leon P, Bajeot AS, Pradère B, Marcq G, Neuzillet Y, Thibault C, Audenet F, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102722. [PMID: 39581669 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search for epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options and follow-up of UTUC was performed between 2022 and 2024 to evaluate available references and their levels of evidence. RESULTS UTUC is a rare malignancy with specific risk factors, including exposure to aristolochic acid and Lynch syndrome. Its diagnosis is based on the use of computed tomography urography and ureterorenoscopy with biopsies. A prognostic classification has been proposed to discriminate low- and high-risk lesions mainly on the basis of tumour grade (low/high) and imaging aspects (non-invasive/invasive). Tumour size (<2/≥2cm), focality (uni-/multifocal), and hydronephrosis (absent/present) are more relative risk factors. The standard of care for low-risk patients is currently conservative treatment involving ureterorenoscopy laser ablation, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is advised for those with high-risk disease. Adjuvant treatments after RNU include intravesical instillation of chemotherapy to decrease the risk of bladder recurrence and delivery of platinum-based chemotherapy in pT2-T4 and/or pN+ patients. First-line treatment for metastatic UTUC is based on the combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. For unfit patients, platinum-based chemotherapy plus nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab or platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab in those with at least stable disease can be proposed. The surveillance regimen and schedule depend on the disease stage. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to improving the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Roumiguié
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | | | - Doriane Prost
- Urology Department, Paris Saint Joseph Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Urology Department, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Sophie Bajeot
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- UROSUD Urology Department, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tuderti G, Mastroianni R, Proietti F, Wu Z, Wang L, Franco A, Abdollah F, Finati M, Ferro M, Tozzi M, Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Bhanvadia R, Margulis V, Bronimann S, Singla N, Hakimi K, Derweesh IH, Correa A, Helstrom E, Mendiola DF, Gonzalgo ML, David RB, Mehrazin R, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Yong C, Sundaram CP, Tufano A, Perdonà S, Ghoreifi A, Moghaddam FS, Djaladat H, Ditonno F, Antonelli A, Autorino R, Simone G. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and clinically positive nodes Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma treated with Nephroureterectomy: real-world data from the ROBUUST 2.0 Registry. World J Urol 2024; 42:575. [PMID: 39395052 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05267-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes, within a large multicenter cohort of Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with Nephroureterectomy. METHODS A multicenter retrospective analysis utilizing the Robotic surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Study registry was performed. Baseline, preoperative, perioperative, and pathologic variables of three groups of patients receiving surgery only, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. Categorical and continuous variables among the three subgroups were compared with Chi square and ANOVA tests. The impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes was assessed with the Kaplan Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS Overall, 1,994 patients were included. Overall and Clavien grade ≥3 complications rates were comparable among the three subgroups (p = 0.65 and p = 0.92). At Kaplan Meier analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved cancer-specific survival (p = 0.03) and overall survival (p = 0.03) probabilities of patients with cT ≥ 3 tumors and of those with positive cN (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with an improvement of cancer-specific survival in cT ≥ 3 patients (HR 0.44; p = 0.04), and of both cancer-specific survival (HR 0.50; p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.53; p = 0.02) probabilities in positive cN patients. CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter retrospective analysis suggests significant survival benefit in Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with either locally advanced or clinically positive nodes disease receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings can be regarded as "hypothesis generating", stimulating future trials focusing on such advanced stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marco Finati
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Tozzi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Stephan Bronimann
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nirmish Singla
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Hakimi
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andreas Correa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Emma Helstrom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Dinno F Mendiola
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Reuben Ben David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Courtney Yong
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Antonio Tufano
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Fondazione "G. Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Fondazione "G. Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Farshad S Moghaddam
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muramoto K, Urabe F, Koike Y, Yamamoto S, Suzuki H, Miyajima K, Fukuokaya W, Iwatani K, Imai Y, Igarashi T, Mori K, Aikawa K, Kimura S, Tashiro K, Yamada Y, Sasaki T, Sato S, Yuen SKK, Shimomura T, Furuta A, Tsuzuki S, Miki J, Kimura T. Perioperative renal function change and oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:332.e21-332.e32. [PMID: 38729868 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) on postoperative renal function in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has not been thoroughly explored. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis including 785 patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC. We assessed the preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) and factors related to the decline in eGFR. Additionally, we examined the effect of comorbidities (diabetes or hypertension) on the postoperative eGFR at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to investigate the clinical effect of RNUx on oncological outcomes, including non-urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR levels were 54.7 and 40.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 respectively. The proportions of patients with preoperative and postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 35.9% and 5.1%, respectively. The median decline in the eGFR after surgery was 26.8%. Patients with preoperative eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 demonstrated significantly lower odds of a postoperative decline in eGFR of 25% or more. The effect of comorbidities on postoperative eGFR at 1 year was significant (P = 0.048). The 3-year NUTRFS, CSS, and OS rates were 72.9%, 85.2%, and 81.5%, respectively. Preoperative chronic kidney disease was an independent factor associated with inferior NUTRFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION Different degrees of impairment of renal function occur among UTUC patients. Only 5.1% of patients retain a postoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Preoperative renal impairment was linked to reduced odds of postoperative eGFR decrease and associated with survival. In addition, the presence of comorbidities had a significant effect on the decline in eGFR. These findings emphasize the importance of developing evidence-based perioperative treatment strategies for UTUC patients with impaired renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuki Muramoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yuhei Koike
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shutaro Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Suzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Igarashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaya Sasaki
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steffi Kar Kei Yuen
- S.H.Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tatsuya Shimomura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Furuta
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kawamura T, Ikarashi D, Machida A, Tamura D, Matsuura T, Maekawa S, Kato R, Kanehira M, Takata R, Obara W. Changes in Renal Function After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer in Elderly Patients. Cureus 2024; 16:e61479. [PMID: 38952589 PMCID: PMC11215704 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Decreased renal function after radical nephroureterectomy is one of the most important complications because it contributes to the decision to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with changes in renal function after radical nephroureterectomy in elderly patients. Methodology A total of 145 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma were evaluated. The renal function was calculated preoperatively, postoperatively, and one month postoperatively, and the long-term change in renal function was investigated once a year. The association between clinical factors and changes in renal function following radical nephroureterectomy in univariate and multivariate analyses was stratified by age ≥75 years and <75 years. Results The median age of the patients was 71 years, with 94 patients (65%) aged <75 years and 51 patients (35%) aged ≥75 years. The median estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were 57.1 (21.8-100) preoperatively, 36.1 (9.1-100) postoperatively, and 42.4 (19.5-100) in one month after radical nephroureterectomy. The median eGFRs in elderly patients were 50.8 (21.8-85.4) preoperatively. In the elderly group, only 8% had an eGFR of ≥50 as cisplatin-eligible at one month postoperatively. The long-term renal function in the elderly may decline further than during the stable postoperative periods. In the multivariate analysis, hydronephrosis (HN) was a significant predictor of decreased renal function in patients aged ≥75 years between the pre- and postoperative periods. Conclusions Elderly patients with HN who have upper tract urothelial carcinoma have a lower risk of decreased renal function after radical nephroureterectomy. This result may be useful in determining adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Arisa Machida
- Hospital Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, JPN
| | | | | | | | - Renpei Kato
- Urology, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, JPN
| | | | - Ryo Takata
- Urology, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, JPN
| | - Wataru Obara
- Urology, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shinohara M, Hata S, Inoue T, Shibuya T, Ando T, Mimata H, Shin T. Simple predictors for the completion of scheduled gemcitabine‑cisplatin regimens based on real‑world urothelial cancer data. Mol Clin Oncol 2024; 20:37. [PMID: 38628558 PMCID: PMC11019467 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard first line of chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma. However, it is often difficult to complete scheduled GC therapy because of real-world adverse events. Therefore, the reasons behind delays, scheduled cancelations and determined predictive factors for completing scheduled GC therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from 2009 to 2020 received a 4-week GC therapy schedule in Oita University Hospital. Information was retrospectively extracted from medical records and all cycles were divided into two groups: One wherein all treatments were administered and completed on schedule and the other wherein treatment was either delayed or canceled in during the treatment schedule. Predictive factors were then statistically extracted between the two groups. In total, 70 patients received 201 cycles of a 4-week scheduled GC therapy. Of the 201 cycles, a total of 68 (33.8%) completed all scheduled treatments, while 133 (66.1%) did not complete the treatment as scheduled. In the group where administration was not completed on schedule, the factors of male, ureteral cancer, lower stage, <90% of gemcitabine and cisplatin dosage, solitary kidney, high creatinine level, low estimated glomerular filtration rate level, low platelet count and high alkaline phosphatase level at the initiation of each cycle were more significant. Additionally, the lowest anticancer drug percentage administration was on day 15. From these results, predictive factors for patients with various backgrounds who completed the scheduled 4-week GC therapy based on real-world data were identified. This information can be useful for clinical physicians when deciding the course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayuka Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Shinro Hata
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Toru Inoue
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Tadamasa Shibuya
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Tadasuke Ando
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Mimata
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Shin
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Renal Surgery and Urology, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Oita 879-5593, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Saito R, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Haitani T, Nagahama K, Ito M, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Hydronephrosis severity as a predictor of postoperative renal function decline following laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:464-472. [PMID: 38316710 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02468-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate factors, including the degree of hydronephrosis, that may be associated with decreased renal function after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS This study included 252 patients who underwent laparoscopic RNU with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 in three institutions. We assessed the association between hydronephrosis grade and perioperative renal function and performed a stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify factors associated with postoperative eGFR. Patients with preoperative eGFR ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were divided into a training set and an independent external validation set to develop a predictive model for postoperative renal function. RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR were 61.1 and 46.4 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The eGFR preservation rates were 66.9%, 66.6%, 88.1%, and 100.0% in groups without, with mild, moderate, and severe hydronephrosis, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors predictive of postoperative eGFR included sex, preoperative eGFR, clinical T stage (cT3-4), and the presence of moderate or severe hydronephrosis. Our predictive model, based on these factors, positively correlated with actual postoperative renal function, and the similarity in categories with or without renal function insufficiency between predicted and actual postoperative renal functions was 78% in both training and validation sets. CONCLUSION Moderate or severe hydronephrosis is associated with a modest postoperative decline in renal function, while mild hydronephrosis is not. Our predictive model may be useful in predicting postoperative renal function insufficiency and guiding decision-making for perioperative medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1 Fukakusa Mukaihata-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8555, Japan.
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee CU, Lee JH, Lee HW, Chung JH, Song W, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Sung HH. Analysis of progression after elective distal ureterectomy and effects of salvage radical nephroureterectomy in patients with distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3497. [PMID: 38347103 PMCID: PMC10861547 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54232-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
We compared the progression patterns after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and elective distal ureterectomy (DU) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter. Between Jan 2011 and Dec 2020, 127 patients who underwent RNU and 46 who underwent elective DU for distal ureteral cancer were enrolled in this study. The patterns of progression and upper tract recurrence were compared between the two groups. Progression was defined as a local recurrence and/or distant metastasis after surgery. Upper tract recurrence and subsequent treatment in patients with DU were analyzed. Progression occurred in 35 (27.6%) and 10 (21.7%) patients in the RNU and DU groups, respectively. The progression pattern was not significantly different (p = 0.441), and the most common progression site was the lymph nodes in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pT2 stage, concomitant lymphovascular invasion, and nodal stage were significant predictors of disease progression. Upper tract recurrence was observed in nine (19.6%) patients with DU, and six (66.7%) patients had a prior history of bladder tumor. All patients with upper tract recurrence after DU were managed with salvage RNU. Elective DU with or without salvage treatment was not a risk factor for disease progression (p = 0.736), overall survival (p = 0.457), cancer-specific survival (p = 0.169), or intravesical recurrence-free survival (p = 0.921). In terms of progression patterns and oncological outcomes, there was no difference between patients who underwent RNU and elective DU with/without salvage treatment. Elective DU should be considered as a therapeutic option for distal ureter tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hye Won Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ye Y, Zheng Y, Li J, Miao Q, Lin M, Chen J, Ruan H, Zhang X. Endoscopic excision versus radical nephroureterectomy for non-muscle invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based large cohort study. Heliyon 2023; 9:e22408. [PMID: 38107280 PMCID: PMC10724554 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As an important kidney-sparing treatment for upper urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), whether endoscopic excision can be performed without sacrificing oncologic outcomes remains indefinite. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and efficacy of endoscopic excision, in patients with non-muscle invasive UTUC (NMIUTUC) and compare them to those of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we reviewed 4347 cases with NMIUTUC (cTis/Ta/T1-N0-M0,≤ 5.0 cm) between 2004 and 2020. Surgical treatment modalities included endoscopic excision and RNU. Propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize the selection bias between endoscopic excision and RNU, selecting 1:1 matched patients in the two group. Results A total of 794 patients with NMIUTUC were included after matching (397:397). Patients who underwent endoscopic excision had worse survival outcomes compared with those of patients who underwent RNU (5-year OS: 65.3 % vs. 80.3 %, p < 0.0001; 5-year DSS: 83.2 % vs. 94.0 %, p = 0.00021). After stratification by anatomical sites, the effect of endoscopic excision for NMI renal pelvis cancer was worse than RNU (5-year OS, 62.9 % vs. 82.8 %; 5-year DSS, 78.8 % vs. 91.6 %), while in NMI ureteral cancer, there is no statistically significant difference in OS and DSS between endoscopic excision and RNU. Further stratification according to tumor grade revealed equivalent tumor control effects of endoscopic excision and RNU in low-grade NMI ureteral cancer (5-year OS: 67.7 % vs. 72.5 %, p = 0.23; 5-year DSS: 87.2 % vs. 93.1 %, p = 0.17); while for renal pelvis tumor and high-grade ureteral tumor, endoscopic excision was related with significantly inferior prognosis. Conclusions Only for low-grade NMI ureteral cancer, endoscopic excision and RNU are oncologically equivalent, indicating that endoscopic excision might be an effective option for low-grade NMI ureteral cancer. This result needs to be further verified in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhong Ye
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yongqiang Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Junteng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Qi Miao
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Mei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China
| | - Jiawei Chen
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Hailong Ruan
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Xiaoping Zhang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Franco A, Ditonno F, Feng C, Manfredi C, Sturgis MR, Farooqi M, Del Giudice F, Coogan C, Ferro M, Zhang C, Wu Z, Yang B, Wang L, Autorino R. Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4585. [PMID: 37760553 PMCID: PMC10527300 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is represented by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The choice of surgical technique in performing UTUC surgery continues to depend on several factors, including the location and extent of the tumor, the patient's overall health, and very importantly, the surgeon's skill, experience, and preference. Although open and laparoscopic approaches are well-established treatments, evidence regarding robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) is growing. Aim of our study was to perform a critical review on the evidence of the last 5 years regarding surgical techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive RNU, mostly focusing on RANU. Reported oncological and function outcomes suggest that minimally invasive RNU is safe and effective, showing similar survival rates compared to the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Carol Feng
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Morgan R. Sturgis
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Mustafa Farooqi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (C.Z.); (Z.W.); (B.Y.); (L.W.)
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (A.F.); (F.D.); (C.F.); (C.M.); (M.R.S.); (M.F.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Okuyama Y, Hatakeyama S, Tabata R, Fujimori D, Kawashima Y, Tanaka T, Fujita N, Okamoto T, Mori K, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Matsuoka T, Sato S, Ohyama C. Impact of nephroureterectomy on postoperative renal function in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Int J Urol 2023; 30:649-657. [PMID: 37130800 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of radical nephroureterectomy on postoperative renal function in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 645 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy between January 2000 and May 2022. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Secondary outcomes included the rate of eGFR decline, identification of factors related to eGFR decline, and the impact of comorbidities (diabetes or cardiovascular disease) on postoperative eGFR at 1 year. RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR levels were 55.6 and 43.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. The rate of patients with preoperative and postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 40.9% and 9.0%, respectively. The median decline in eGFR after surgery was 25.1%. The presence of preoperative unilateral hydronephrosis and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was significantly associated with a low decline of postoperative eGFR and poor survival. The impact of the presence of comorbidities on postoperative eGFR at 1 year was significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Impaired renal function is prevalent in patients with UTUC. The rate of patients with postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 9.0%. The presence of preoperative renal impairment was significantly related to a low decline in postoperative eGFR and poor survival. The presence of comorbidities had a significant effect on eGFR decline 1 year after radical nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiharu Okuyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Ryuji Tabata
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Daiji Fujimori
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Yohei Kawashima
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Sato
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evmorfopoulos K, Mitrakas L, Karathanasis A, Zachos I, Tzortzis V, Vlachostergios PJ. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Rare Malignancy with Distinct Immuno-Genomic Features in the Era of Precision-Based Therapies. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1775. [PMID: 37509415 PMCID: PMC10376290 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, occurring in 5-10% of patients diagnosed with UC, and involves the renal pelvis, calyces, or ureters. UTUC can be sporadic or hereditary as a clinical manifestation of Lynch syndrome. Therapeutic management of these patients is challenging. Following risk stratification of localized disease, patients with low-grade UTUC may undergo kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and/or chemoablation with mitomycin-c instillation to reduce recurrence. In high-grade disease, RNU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard of care. For decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic disease. The aim of the present review is to summarize recent advances in UTUC's therapeutic management through the lens of its genomic and immune landscape. Accumulating knowledge on the genetic and immune aspects of UTUC tumors has increased our understanding of their underlying biology, supporting a luminal papillary, T-cell depleted contexture and enrichment in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) expression. These advances have fueled successful clinical testing of several precision-based therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, and agents targeting the FGFR axis such as erdafitinib and other kinase inhibitors, allowing their entry into the therapeutic armamentarium and improving the prognosis of these patients. Not all patients respond to these precision-based targeted therapies; thus, validating and expanding the toolkit of potential biomarkers of response or resistance, including molecular subtypes, FGFR pathway gene alterations, DNA repair gene defects, tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), nectin-4, TROP2, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), are key to maximizing the benefit to these particular subgroups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Evmorfopoulos
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Lampros Mitrakas
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Karathanasis
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Zachos
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Vassilios Tzortzis
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios
- Department of Urology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Medical Oncology, IASO Thessalias Hospital, 41500 Larissa, Greece
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sui Q, Hu Z, Jin X, Bian Y, Liang J, Zhang H, Yang H, Lin Z, Wang Q, Zhan C, Chen Z. The genomic signature of resistance to platinum-containing neoadjuvant therapy based on single-cell data. Cell Biosci 2023; 13:103. [PMID: 37291676 PMCID: PMC10249226 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-023-01061-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) becomes the first-line option for advanced tumors, while patients who are not sensitive to it may not benefit. Therefore, it is important to screen patients suitable for NACT. METHODS Single-cell data of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) before and after cisplatin-containing (CDDP) NACT and cisplatin IC50 data of tumor cell lines were analyzed to establish a CDDP neoadjuvant chemotherapy score (NCS). Differential analysis, GO, KEGG, GSVA and logistic regression models were performed by R. Survival analysis were applied to public databases. siRNA knockdown in A549, PC9, TE1 cell lines, qRT-PCR, western-blot, cck8 and EdU experiments were used for further verification in vitro. RESULTS 485 genes were expressed differentially in tumor cells before and after neoadjuvant treatment for LUAD and ESCC. After combining the CDDP-associated genes, 12 genes, CAV2, PHLDA1, DUSP23, VDAC3, DSG2, SPINT2, SPATS2L, IGFBP3, CD9, ALCAM, PRSS23, PERP, were obtained and formed the NCS score. The higher the score, the more sensitive the patients were to CDDP-NACT. The NCS divided LUAD and ESCC into two groups. Based on differentially expressed genes, a model was constructed to predict the high and low NCS. CAV2, PHLDA1, ALCAM, CD9, IGBP3 and VDAC3 were significantly associated with prognosis. Finally, we demonstrated that the knockdown of CAV2, PHLDA1 and VDAC3 in A549, PC9 and TE1 significantly increased the sensitivity to cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS NCS scores and related predictive models for CDDP-NACT were developed and validated to assist in selecting patients who might benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihai Sui
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhengyang Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xing Jin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yunyi Bian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jiaqi Liang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Huiqiang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zongwu Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qun Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Cheng Zhan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Zhencong Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wei W, Liu J, Wang L, Duan X, Ding D. Segmental ureterectomy for high-risk ureteral carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Urol 2023; 23:103. [PMID: 37277741 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND EAU guidelines strongly recommend kidney sparing surgery (KSS) as the primary treatment option for the low-risk UTUC patients. While there are few reports involving the KSS treated for the high-risk counterparts, especially the ureteral resection. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the segmental ureterectomy (SU) for the patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 20 patients from May 2017 to December 2021 who underwent segmental ureterectomy (SU) in Henan Provincial People's Hospital. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Besides, the ECOG scores and postoperative complications were also included. RESULTS As of December 2022, the mean OS was 62.1months (95%CI:55.6-68.6months) and the mean PFS was 45.0months (95%CI:35.9-54.1months). The median OS and median PFS were not reached. The 3-year OS rate was 70% and the 3-year PFS rate was 50%. The percentage of Clavien I and II complications was 15%. CONCLUSION For the selected patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma, the efficacy and safety of segmental ureterectomy were satisfactory. But we still need to conduct prospective or randomized study to validate the value of SU in patients with high-risk ureteral carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wei
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingdian Wang
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Duan
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zimpfer A, Kdimati S, Mosig M, Rudolf H, Zettl H, Erbersdobler A, Hakenberg OW, Maruschke M, Schneider B. ERBB2 Amplification as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092414. [PMID: 37173881 PMCID: PMC10177383 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) occur in about 5-10% of all urothelial carcinomas and are frequently discovered in high-stage disease. We aimed to evaluate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) protein expression immunohistochemically and ERBB2 amplification in UTUCs by fluorescence in situ hybridization, applying a tissue microarray technique. ERBB2 overexpression and ERBB2 amplification were defined according to the recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) for breast cancer and gastric carcinoma (GC), revealing scores of 2+ and 3+ in 10.2% and 41.8% of UTUCs, respectively. The performance parameters showed obviously higher sensitivity of ERBB2 immunoscoring according to the ASCO/CAP criteria for GC. ERBB2 amplification was detected in 10.5% of UTUCs. ERBB2 overexpression was more likely to be found in high-grade tumors and was associated with tumor progression. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) in cases with ERBB2 immunoscores of 2+ or 3+ according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines for GC. UTUCs with ERBB2 amplification showed a significantly shorter PFS in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Irrespective of their ERBB2 status, patients with UTUC treated with platin showed a significantly lower PFS than UTUC patients who had not received any platin-based therapy. In addition, UTUC patients with a normal ERBB2 gene status who had not received platin-based therapy showed significantly longer overall survival. The results suggest that ERBB2 is a biomarker for progression in UTUCs and may define a distinct subgroup of UTUCs. As previously shown, ERBB2 amplification is infrequent. However, the small number of patients diagnosed with ERBB2-amplified UTUC might benefit from ERBB2-targeted cancer therapy. In clinical-pathological routine diagnostics, the determination of ERBB2 amplification is an established method in some defined entities and also successful in small samples. Still, the simultaneous use of ERBB2 immunohistochemistry and ERBB2 in situ hybridization would be important in order to record the low rate of amplified UTUC cases as completely as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Zimpfer
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Said Kdimati
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Melanie Mosig
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Henrik Rudolf
- Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Heike Zettl
- Clinical Cancer Registry, University of Rostock, 18055 Rostock, Germany
| | - Andreas Erbersdobler
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Matthias Maruschke
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
- Department of Urology, HELIOS Hanseklinikum, 18435 Stralsund, Germany
| | - Björn Schneider
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Luo HL, Chang YL, Liu HY, Wu YT, Sung MT, Su YL, Huang CC, Wang PC, Peng JM. VCAN Hypomethylation and Expression as Predictive Biomarkers of Drug Sensitivity in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24087486. [PMID: 37108649 PMCID: PMC10139123 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Versican (VCAN), also known as extracellular matrix proteoglycan 2, has been suggested as a potential biomarker in cancers. Previous research has found that VCAN is highly expressed in bladder cancer. However, its role in predicting outcomes for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is not well understood. In this study, we collected tissues from 10 patients with UTUC, including 6 with and 4 without lymphovascular invasion (LVI), a pathological feature that plays a significant role in determining metastasis. Results from RNA sequencing revealed that the most differentially expressed genes were involved in extracellular matrix organization. Using the TCGA database for clinical correlation, VCAN was identified as a target for study. A chromosome methylation assay showed that VCAN was hypomethylated in tumors with LVI. In our patient samples, VCAN expression was also found to be high in UTUC tumors with LVI. In vitro analysis showed that knocking down VCAN inhibited cell migration but not proliferation. A heatmap analysis also confirmed a significant correlation between VCAN and migration genes. Additionally, silencing VCAN increased the effectiveness of cisplatin, gemcitabine and epirubicin, thus providing potential opportunities for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Ting Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Tse Sung
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Li Su
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Chia Wang
- Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| | - Jei-Ming Peng
- Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Clinical Characteristics and Current Status of Treatment for Recurrent Bladder Cancer after Surgeries on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13051004. [PMID: 36900148 PMCID: PMC10000489 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13051004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare, but highly malignant, disease with an estimated annual incidence of 2 cases per 100,000 people. The main surgical treatment modalities for UTUC are radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection. After surgery, intravesical recurrence (IVR) can occur in up to 47% of patients, and 75% of them present with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, there are few studies focused on the diagnosis and treatment of postoperatively recurrent bladder cancer for patients with previous UTUC history (UTUC-BC), and many of the influencing factors are still controversial. In this article, we performed a narrative review of the recent literature, mainly summarizing the factors influencing postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC and discussing the subsequent prevention, monitoring, and treatment tools for it.
Collapse
|
22
|
Qiu Y, Zhang X, Dong Z, Zhang Y, Zhai Q, Lv S, Wei Q. Comparable survival benefits of partial ureterectomy to radical nephroureterectomy in non-metastatic ureter carcinoma: a population-matched study. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:579-588. [PMID: 36472798 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03429-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to compare the long-term oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder cancer recurrence (BCR) among patients with ureter carcinoma who received nephroureterectomy (RNU) or partial ureterectomy (PU). METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015 of patients with ureter carcinoma who underwent RNU or PU. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline data. The Kaplan-Meier method with subgroup analysis was conducted to verify the effect of the two surgery types. Fine-Gray competing risk regression estimated the cumulative incidence of BCR. RESULTS A total of 2509 patients were involved; 665 (26.5%) patients underwent PU, and 1844 (73.5%) patients underwent RNU. Patients who underwent PU experienced a similar OS and CSS compared with those who underwent RNU in both PSM cohorts (HR [hazard ratio], 1.07 (0.93-1.23); P = 0.37; HR, 1.10 (0.91-1.31); P = 0.32, respectively), adjust model (HR, 0.99 (0.88-1.11); P = 0.87; HR, 1.05 (0.90-1.20); P = 0.55, respectively), and the subgroup analysis. For BCR, the patients who underwent PU were associated with a similar risk of developing BCR compared with those that received RNU, according to the univariate competing risk model (P = 0.47), adjust model (HR, 1.00 (0.73-1.37); P = 1), and subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION RNU did not confer a distinct survival advantage compared with PU, which supports the role of PU in treating patients with ureter carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Qiu
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xuehua Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ziyan Dong
- Department of Adult Surgery, Guangdong Women and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yifan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiliang Zhai
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shidong Lv
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Subclassification of pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. World J Urol 2023; 41:767-776. [PMID: 36739339 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04300-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) varies. The current study aimed to further classify patients with pT3 UTUC into different survival outcome groups based on tumor location and site of invasion. METHODS This retrospective study included 323 patients with pT3 UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy at 11 hospitals in Japan. Histological and clinical data were obtained via a chart review. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed the effect of different variables on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median age of the patients was 72 years. Patients with pT3 UTUCs were divided into two groups: those with renal parenchymal invasion only (pT3a, n = 95) and those with peripelvic or periureteral fat invasion (pT3b, n = 228). pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with hydronephrosis, low preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), histological nodal metastasis, nuclear grade 3, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ, and positive surgical margin. Based on the univariate analyses, patients with pT3b UTUC had a significantly lower 5-year RFS (42.4% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.0001), 5-year CSS (54.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.0002), and 5-year OS (47.8% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.0001) than those with pT3a UTUC. According to the multivariate analyses, nodal metastasis, LVI, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative eGFR, nuclear grade (RFS only), surgical margin (RFS only), and Charlson comorbidity index (OS only), but not pT3b stage, were associated with survival. CONCLUSION Compared with pT3a UTUC, pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with worse histological features, consequently resulting in unsatisfactory survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
24
|
Bianchi A, von Deimling M, Pallauf M, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Majdoub M, Motlagh RS, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Shariat SF. Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:177-195. [PMID: 36440477 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies. AREAS COVERED Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management. EXPERT OPINION Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kawada T, Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Pallauf M, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pradere B, Fajkovic H, Enikeev D, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Araki M, Shariat SF. Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Endoscopic Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:236-240. [PMID: 36463089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
We systematically reviewed the literature and summarized oncologic and safety outcomes for endoscopic management (EM) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Studies comparing oncologic and/or safety results for EM versus RNU in patients with UTUC were included in our review. Overall, 13 studies met the criteria, and five studies were included in a meta-analysis using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). EM was associated similar OS (HR 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-2.16), CSS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.99-1.91), and BRFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61-1.55) to RNU, while 28-85% of patients treated with EM experienced upper tract recurrence across the studies. EM required more interventions with a higher cumulative risk of complications and lower likelihood of renal preservation. In summary, EM for low-grade UTUC had comparable survival outcomes to RNU at the cost of higher local recurrence rates resulting in a need for long-term rigorous surveillance and repeated interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected cases of cancer in the upper urinary tract, surgical treatment via a telescope inserted through the urethra or the skin (endoscope) results in cancer control outcomes that are comparable to those after removal of the kidney and ureter. However, because of its higher rate of local recurrence, this approach requires repeated endoscopic treatment sessions. Patients should be well informed about these issues to help in shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
26
|
Neuzillet Y, Seisen T, Traxer O, Allory Y, Audenet F, Leon P, Loriot Y, Pradère B, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Masson-Lecomte A, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1164-1194. [PMID: 36400481 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhu S, Yu C, Wang C, Ding G, Cheng S. Case report: Significant benefits of tislelizumab combined with anlotinib in first-line treatment of metastatic renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with sarcomatoid carcinoma differentiation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:969106. [PMID: 36330483 PMCID: PMC9623047 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.969106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with sarcomatoid carcinoma differentiation is a very dangerous malignant tumor and extremely rare in clinical practice. In general, these tumors with a dismal prognosis, and there is no standard treatment. Case presentation In this case, an 81-year-old male patient was diagnosed with right renal pelvic carcinoma. After an open right radical nephroureterectomy, postoperative pathological examination showed infiltrating urothelial carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation. Overexpression of programmed death ligand-1 by immunohistochemistry. The carcinoma recurred 4.5 months after surgery. After informed, tislelizumab combined with anlotinib were used as first-line treatment. The patients showed a clinical partial response that lasted for 20 months. Conclusion This case demonstrates the efficacy of tislelizumab combined with anlotinib in patients diagnosed with metastatic renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with sarcomatoid carcinoma differentiation. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first application of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibin Zhu
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chenhao Yu
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chongwei Wang
- Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guoqing Ding
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Guoqing Ding, ; Sheng Cheng,
| | - Sheng Cheng
- Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Guoqing Ding, ; Sheng Cheng,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Labbate CV, Hensley PJ, Miest TS, Qiao W, Adibi M, Shah AY, Chery L, Papadopoulos J, Siefker-Radtke AO, Gao J, Guo CC, Czerniak BA, Navai N, Kamat AM, Dinney CP, Campbell MT, Matin SF. Longitudinal GFR trends after neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:454.e17-454.e23. [PMID: 35961847 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Renal function dictates sequencing and eligibility for definitive therapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We investigated longitudinal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy prior to RNU for UTUC from 2000 to 2019 were included. GFR was calculated by CKD-Epi before chemotherapy, before RNU, 1 to 3 months, and 12 months post-RNU. Pathologic stage and overall survival were compared in those with stable GFR (+/-10% of baseline) to the rest of the cohort. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-two patients received ≥3 cycles of NAC, with 121 (79%) receiving at least 1 cycle of cisplatin. Renal function dropped by mean of 22.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 from the beginning of chemotherapy to 1-year post-surgery. In patients receiving cisplatin, a mean decline of 26.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 was observed vs. 8.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 without cisplatin-based NAC (P < 0.01). GFR after RNU was unchanged between 3 and 12 months postoperatively. At 1 to 3 months after RNU, 19% of patients had GFR<30 ml/min/1.73m2. Improvement in GFR during NAC was associated with invasive final pathologic stage (P = 0.018) and worse overall survival (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS In patients managed with NAC prior to RNU, renal function stabilizes at 1 to 3 months post-operatively and remains clinically similar for cisplatin or non-cisplatin-based therapy. Improvement in GFR during NAC was associated with higher pathologic stage and poorer survival, especially in those receiving non-cisplatin-based therapy, an observation that requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig V Labbate
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tanner S Miest
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Qiao
- Biostatistics and Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mehrad Adibi
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lisly Chery
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John Papadopoulos
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jianjun Gao
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles C Guo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bogdan A Czerniak
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Neema Navai
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li S, Chen X, Zheng J, Liu X. Reduced Preoperative Glomerular Filtration Rate Is Associated With Adverse Postoperative Oncological Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Surg 2022; 9:872273. [PMID: 35548184 PMCID: PMC9082599 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.872273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the association between perioperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and postoperative oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU),and to evaluate the effect of sex on this association. Methods The medical records of patients with UTUC who underwent RNU between January 2012 and December 2017 at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on preoperative eGFRs: normal eGFR (>60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 179), moderately reduced eGFR (45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 45), and severely reduced eGFR (≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 36). Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of preoperative eGFR on prognosis. Results Patient mean age was 66.7 ± 9.6 years, and 47.9% were female. Multivariate regression analysis based on Cox proportional risk models and Kaplan-Meier survival rates showed that lower preoperative eGFR was associated with decreased OS, PFS, and CSS. In the adjusted Cox regression model, patients with normal and moderately reduced eGFRs had a decreased hazard for mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.26] and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.18-0.73), respectively (P < 0.001). The smooth fitting curve suggested a linear relationship between eGFR and prognostic survival. Additionally, sensitivity subgroup analyses verified an inverse relationship between the reduced eGFR and OS. Women had a lower eGFR and worse oncological outcomes than men. A nomogram for OS was developed based on multivariate analysis with a C-index of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.728-0.779). Conclusion Preoperative renal insufficiency is strongly associated with a higher risk of cancer progression and a lower survival probability. It is important to identify preoperative renal insufficiency in patients with UTUC, particularly female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xuefeng Liu
- Department of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Grossmann NC, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Katayama S, Fankhauser CD, Xylinas E, Margulis V, Moschini M, Abufaraj M, Bandini M, Lonati C, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes from a Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:227-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
31
|
Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Mollica V, Schiavina R, Fiorentino M, Brunocilla E, Ardizzoni A, Massari F. Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a change of paradigm? A meta-analysis of aggregate data. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:e61-e68. [PMID: 34387596 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eligible studies were identified using Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Platinum-based AC was associated with improved DFS, while the benefit in OS and CSS was not statistically significant compared to observation. Conversely, platinum-based AC showed a modest OS benefit in an analysis combing multivariable HRs with estimated HRs from Kaplan-Meier curves. Our results suggest that platinum-based AC is associated with improved DFS and a modest OS benefit in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wu Z, Chen Q, Djaladat H, Minervini A, Uzzo RG, Sundaram CP, Rha KH, Gonzalgo ML, Mehrazin R, Mazzone E, Marcus J, Danno A, Porter J, Asghar A, Ghali F, Guruli G, Douglawi A, Cacciamani G, Ghoreifi A, Simone G, Margulis V, Ferro M, Tellini R, Mari A, Srivastava A, Steward J, Al-Qathani A, Al-Mujalhem A, Bhattu AS, Mottrie A, Abdollah F, Eun DD, Derweesh I, Veccia A, Autorino R, Wang L. A Preoperative Nomogram to Predict Renal Function Insufficiency for Cisplatin-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy (ROBUUST Collaborative Group). Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:173-181. [PMID: 33549537 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative renal function impairment represents a main limitation for delivering adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). OBJECTIVE To create a model predicting renal function decline after minimally invasive RNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 490 patients with nonmetastatic UTUC who underwent minimally invasive RNU were identified from a collaborative database including 17 institutions worldwide (February 2006 to March 2020). Renal function insufficiency for cisplatin-based regimen was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 3 mo after RNU. Patients with baseline eGFR >50 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 361) were geographically divided into a training set (n = 226) and an independent external validation set (n = 135) for further analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, a nomogram to predict postoperative eGFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m2 was built based on the coefficients of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) logistic regression. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical use of the nomogram were investigated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The model that incorporated age, body mass index, preoperative eGFR, and hydroureteronephrosis was developed with an area under the curve of 0.771, which was confirmed to be 0.773 in the external validation set. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement. Besides, the model was converted into a risk score with a cutoff value of 0.583, and the difference between the low- and high-risk groups both in overall death risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.59, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific death risk (HR: 5.19, p < 0.001) was statistically significant. The limitation mainly lies in its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS A nomogram incorporating immediately available clinical variables can accurately predict renal insufficiency for cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after minimally invasive RNU and may serve as a tool facilitating patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We have developed a model for the prediction of renal function loss after radical nephroureterectomy to facilitate patient selection for perioperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Koon H Rha
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elio Mazzone
- OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium;ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Jamil Marcus
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alyssa Danno
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Aeen Asghar
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Antoin Douglawi
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Steward
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ali Al-Qathani
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ahmad Al-Mujalhem
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Amit Satish Bhattu
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Daniel D Eun
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yuan Y, Wang Y, Zhang N, Mao X, Huang Y, Huang J, Ji N. Influence of American Society of Anesthesiologists Score on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Large-Sample Study in Two Institutions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:723669. [PMID: 34671552 PMCID: PMC8521060 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.723669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction As a research team of urologists and an anesthetist, we sought to investigate the prognostic significance of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). ASA physical status (ASA-PS) classification not only was found to be associated with increased comorbidities but also independently factors for predicting morbidity and mortality. Accurate risk assessment was being particularly important for patients being considered for surgery. Methods Records for 958 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU were reviewed. Clinicopathologic variables, including ASA-PS, were assessed at two institutions. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analyses. We measured the independent predictive value of ASA-PS for mortality by multivariate regression. Association of ASA-PS and clinicopathologic variables was assessed. Results The group of patients with ASA = 2/3 had a shorter 5-year OS (67.6% and 49.9%), CSS (72.9% and 58.1%), and MFS (75.1% and 58.5%). The median follow-up time was 39 months. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the group with ASA = 2/3 had significantly poorer OS, CSS, and MFS. Adjusting for multiple potential confounding factors, multivariate analyses suggested that ASA score was an independent predictor of OS, CSS, and MFS (p = 0.004, p = 0.005, p < 0.001). Conclusion Higher ASA scores were independently associated with lower survival rate. This capability, along with its simplicity, makes it a valuable prognostic metric. It should be seriously referenced in UTUC patients being considered for RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yichu Yuan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiqiu Wang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiawa Mao
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yiran Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Na Ji
- Department of Anesthesia, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kim MH, Yuk HD, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate as a Prognostic Factor in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4155. [PMID: 34575266 PMCID: PMC8472261 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative renal function is associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The purpose of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to determine the association of preoperative renal function with oncological outcome in patients who underwent RNU. We searched articles published up to March 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase by combining "urothelial carcinoma", "radical nephroureterectomy", and "estimated glomerular filtration rate". We also manually screened the reference list for publications following general guidelines recommended by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The relationship between preoperative renal function and survival was expressed as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). This review and meta-analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 4668 patients who received RNU. Pooled analysis showed significant negative association of preoperative renal function with PFS (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.80, p < 0.00001), CSS (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.38-1.92, p < 0.00001), and OS (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.35, p < 0.00001). Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who received RNU showed a significant negative association of preoperative renal function with survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea; (M.H.K.); (H.D.Y.); (C.W.J.); (C.K.); (H.H.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luo HL, Liu HY, Chang YL, Sung MT, Chen PY, Su YL, Huang CC, Peng JM. Hypomethylated RRBP1 Potentiates Tumor Malignancy and Chemoresistance in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22168761. [PMID: 34445467 PMCID: PMC8395942 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Ribosome-binding protein 1 (RRBP1) is a potential oncogene in several cancer types. However, the correlation between RRBP1 expression and the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. In this study, we identified that RRBP1 is associated with carcinogenesis and metastasis in UTUC using a methylation profiling microarray. High correlations between RRBP1 and cancer stages, nodal metastasis status, molecular subtypes, and prognosis in bladder urothelial cancer (BLCA) were found. Aberrant DNA methylation in the gene body region of RRBP1 was determined in UTUC tissues by methylation-specific PCR. RRBP1 expression was significantly increased in UTUC tissues and cell lines, as determined by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. RRBP1 depletion significantly reduced BFTC909 cell growth induced by specific shRNA. On the other hand, molecular subtype analysis showed that the expression of RRBP1 was associated with genes related to cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and basal markers. A patient-derived organoid model was established to analyze patients' responses to different drugs. The expression of RRBP1 was related to chemoresistance. Taken together, these results provide the first evidence that RRBP1 gene body hypomethylation predicts RRBP1 high expression in UTUC. The data highlight the importance of RRBP1 in UTUC malignancy and chemotherapeutic tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan; (H.-L.L.); (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.); (P.-Y.C.)
| | - Hui-Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan; (H.-L.L.); (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.); (P.-Y.C.)
| | - Yin-Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan; (H.-L.L.); (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.); (P.-Y.C.)
| | - Ming-Tse Sung
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan;
| | - Po-Yen Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan; (H.-L.L.); (H.-Y.L.); (Y.-L.C.); (P.-Y.C.)
| | - Yu-Li Su
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan;
| | - Chun-Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan;
| | - Jei-Ming Peng
- Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-7317123-8597
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ghandour RA, Freifeld Y, Cheaib J, Singla N, Meng X, Kenigsberg A, Bagrodia A, Woldu S, Hoffman-Censits J, Enikeev D, Rapoport L, Petros FG, Raman JD, Pierorazio PM, Matin SF, Margulis V. Predictive model for systemic recurrence following cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy for high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:788.e15-788.e21. [PMID: 34330655 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Systemic recurrence (SR) carries a dismal prognosis. We sought to determine risk factors associated with SR in this setting. METHODS We evaluated a multi-center database of patients with UTUC who received cisplatin-based NAC before RNU. Final pathology at RNU was dichotomized into ypT<2 vs ypT≥2. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with SR. Three groups were defined based on the number of significant risk factors (groups 1, 2, 3 for 0-1, 2, 3 risk factors, respectively) and evaluated for recurrence-free survival (RFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS 106 patients were identified between 2004 and 2018. Median age was 67.0 years [IQR = 61-73.3]; 57 (54%) and 49 (46 %) patients received MVAC and GC, respectively. Final pathological stage was ypT<2 in 57 (54%); 23% (24/106) had SR. On univariable analysis, pathological variables on final specimen including ypT≥2, lymphovascular invasion (ypLVI), and nodal involvement were associated with SR. On multivariable analysis, ypLVI OR = 4.1 (95% CI 1.2-13.6; P = 0.024) and pathological nodal involvement OR = 4.5 (95% CI 1.3-15.7; P = 0.017) were predictive of recurrence. Stratifying by the number of risk factors, the 2-year RFS was 95%, 55%, and 18% for groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (log-rank <0.001). CONCLUSION This model evaluates the risk of SR following NAC and RNU to guide counseling and decision-making after surgery. Adverse pathological variable including ypLVI and nodal involvement, in combination with ypT-stage, are strongly associated with SR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashed A Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Joseph Cheaib
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alexander Kenigsberg
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jean Hoffman-Censits
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow
| | - Leonid Rapoport
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Philip M Pierorazio
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rouprêt M, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Pignot G, Masson-Lecomte A, Compérat E, Houédé N, Larré S, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S52-S77. [PMID: 33349430 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30750-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION -The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS - A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS - The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION - These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, Montpellier Université, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, Bamias A, Lebret T, Shariat SF, Park SH, Ye D, Agerbaek M, Enting D, McDermott R, Gajate P, Peer A, Milowsky MI, Nosov A, Neif Antonio J, Tupikowski K, Toms L, Fischer BS, Qureshi A, Collette S, Unsal-Kacmaz K, Broughton E, Zardavas D, Koon HB, Galsky MD. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:2102-2114. [PMID: 34077643 PMCID: PMC8215888 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2034442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 513] [Impact Index Per Article: 171.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean F Bajorin
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Michael Schenker
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Thierry Lebret
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dingwei Ye
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Mads Agerbaek
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Deborah Enting
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Ray McDermott
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Pablo Gajate
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Avivit Peer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Alexander Nosov
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - João Neif Antonio
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Krzysztof Tupikowski
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Laurence Toms
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Bruce S Fischer
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Anila Qureshi
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Sandra Collette
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Edward Broughton
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Dimitrios Zardavas
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Henry B Koon
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (D.F.B), Weill Cornell Medical College (S.F.S.), and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (M.D.G.) - all in New York; Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.A.W.); the Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany (J.E.G.); Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania (M.S.); Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville (B.P.V.), and Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid (P.G.) - both in Spain; Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan (Y.T.); National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens (A.B.); the Urology Department, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.L.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna (S.F.S.); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.F.S.); Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (S.F.S.); the Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow (S.F.S.), and Federal State Budget Institution N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg (A.N.) - both in Russia; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.P.); Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (D.Y.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (M.A.); Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London (D.E.); St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin (R.M.); Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (A.P.); University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (M.I.M.); Hospital de Amor de Barretos-Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil (J.N.A.); the Subdivision of Urology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.); and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (L.T., B.S.F., A.Q., S.C., K.U.-K., E.B., D.Z., H.B.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yamada Y, Nakagawa T, Miyakawa J, Kawai T, Tabata M, Kaneko T, Taguchi S, Naito A, Hikatsu M, Sato Y, Murata T, Matsumoto A, Miyazaki H, Suzuki M, Enomoto Y, Nishimatsu H, Kondo Y, Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Kume H. Smaller decline of renal function after nephroureterectomy predicts poorer prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1577-1586. [PMID: 34047345 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Renal function is frequently impaired in the patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the impact of renal function and its change after surgery on survival rates in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. METHODS The study cohort comprised 755 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent nephroureterectomy between 1995 and 2016 at nine hospitals in Japan. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the three-variable Japanese equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation from serum creatinine level and age. Outcomes were recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used. RESULTS Median patients' age was 72 years old. Pre- and post-surgical median estimated glomerular filtration rate were 55.5 and 42.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate decline after surgery, which represents function of the affected side kidney, was 13.1 ml/min/1.73 m2. The 5-year recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals were 68.3, 79.4 and 74.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline were associated with poorer recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals, but post-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate was not. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decline was more significant poor-prognosticator than preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. Proportions of the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 before surgery were 50.6 and 73.2% in organ-confined disease and locally advanced disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). After surgery, they were 91.6 and 89.8%, respectively (P = 0.3896). CONCLUSIONS Lower preoperative renal function, especially of the affected side kidney, was significantly associated with poor prognosis after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Many patients with locally advanced disease have reduced renal function at diagnosis and even more after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukio Yamada
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jimpei Miyakawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Tabata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Naito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hikatsu
- Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Murata
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hideyo Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motofumi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nishimatsu
- Department of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Grossmann NC, Araki M, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev D, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Compérat E, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Accuracy and Clinical Utility of a Tumor Grade- and Stage-based Predictive Model in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:761-768. [PMID: 34053904 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among various clinicopathologic factors used to identify low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), tumor grade and stage are of utmost importance. The clinical value added by inclusion of other risk factors remains unproven. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of a tumor grade- and stage-based (GS) model to identify patients with UTUC for whom kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) could be attempted. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this international study, we reviewed the medical records of 1240 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Complete data needed for risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were available for 560 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if risk factors were associated with the presence of localized UTUC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GS, EAU, and NCCN models in predicting pathologic stage were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 198 patients (35%) had clinically low-grade, noninvasive tumors, and 283 (51%) had ≤pT1disease. On multivariable analyses, none of the EAU and NCCN risk factors were associated with the presence of non-muscle-invasive UTUC among patients with low-grade and low-stage UTUC. The GS model exhibited the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value among all three models. According to the GS, EAU, and NCCN models, the proportion of patients eligible for KSS was 35%, 6%, and 4%, respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed that the net benefit of the three models was similar within the clinically reasonable range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS The GS model showed favorable predictive accuracy and identified a greater number of KSS-eligible patients than the EAU and NCCN models. A decision-making algorithm that weighs the benefits of avoiding unnecessary kidney loss against the risk of undertreatment in case of advanced carcinoma is necessary for individualized treatment for UTUC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed the ability of three models to predict low-grade, low-stage disease in patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract. No risk factors other than grade assessed on biopsy and stage assessed from scans were associated with better prediction of localized cancer. A model based on grade and stage may help to identify patients who could benefit from kidney-sparing treatment of their cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: show me the evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:66-67. [PMID: 33196539 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
43
|
Ishiyama Y, Kondo T, Kubota S, Shimada K, Yoshida K, Takagi T, Iizuka J, Tanabe K. Therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy for older patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a propensity score matching study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:802-809. [PMID: 33434927 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Regional lymphadenectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is sometimes avoided in older patients to reduce surgical burden. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy in older patients undergoing curative therapy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. METHODS The patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract older than 75 years at the time of surgery and without lymph node or distant metastasis who underwent curative therapy at two tertiary hospitals between 1994 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete-lymphadenectomy was performed as per our protocol. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival and metastasis-free survival after surgery were evaluated between complete-lymphadenectomy and no/incomplete-lymphadenectomy groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS The original cohort included 150 patients (median age, 80.71 years), and complete-lymphadenectomy was performed in 42 (28.00%) patients. Patients in complete-lymphadenectomy group were younger and less likely to be aged >80 years (both, P < 0.0001). After matching, 30 patients were allocated to each group and the ages were comparable (78.58 vs. 77.48 years, P = 0.1738). High-grade perioperative complication rates did not differ between groups both before and after matching. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival and metastasis-free survival were significantly longer in the complete-lymphadenectomy group both before and after matching (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that complete-lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic benefits for older patients. The decision to perform complete-lymphadenectomy must be based on the patient's physical condition, rather than his/her chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Ishiyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kubota
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East. 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Katsunori Shimada
- Department of Biostatistics, STATZ Institute, Inc. 1-18 Haramachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0053, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University. 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim TH, Lee CU, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Sung HH. Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7828. [PMID: 33837237 PMCID: PMC8035162 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rodrigues Pessoa R, Morrison JC, Konety B, Gershman B, Maroni P, Kukreja JB, Cost N, Flaig T, Kessler E, Sharma P, Kim SP. National trends in clinical and pathologic staging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:832.e9-832.e15. [PMID: 33820697 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With growing support of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), current biopsy methods are challenging, and little is known as to the degree to which patients would appropriately receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from biopsy alone. Herein, we sought to assess the rates of appropriate clinical use of NAC and identify clinicopathologic factors associated with aggressive UTUC amongst patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically localized disease. METHODS From 2004 to 2013, we identified all treatment naïve patients diagnosed with clinically localized, high grade UTUC (cTa-4Nx) who underwent RNU from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Pathologic criteria for NAC (pT2-4N0,x; pTanyN1) from RNU represented the primary outcome. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify covariates associated with primary outcome to determine appropriate use of NAC. RESULTS During the study interval, 5,362 patients were diagnosed with clinically localized UTUC and underwent RNU. Overall, 49.1% of patients presented with an unknown primary tumor stage (Tx) and 24.5% had invasive UTUC from biopsy. On multivariable analysis, upper tract tumor size was associated with invasive UTUC eligible for NAC (all P < 0.05). Amongst patients with cTx UTUC from biopsy, half of patients had pathologic noninvasive UTUC (pTa,is,1) from RNU and would be overtreated with NAC. CONCLUSION Significant uncertainty persists in assigning primary upper tract tumor depth and represents a key barrier to widespread implementation of NAC for patients with high grade UTUC. Further research is needed to more accurately determine clinical criteria to identify patients for NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey C Morrison
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Rush University Medical Center, Division of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Boris Gershman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Boston, MA
| | - Paul Maroni
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Janet B Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Nicholas Cost
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Thomas Flaig
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Elizabeth Kessler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, TX
| | - Simon P Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Yale University, Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
The Consequences of Inadvertent Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2021; 154:127-135. [PMID: 33766715 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine factors associated with performing inadvertent radical nephrectomy (RN) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and to assess the impact of radical nephrectomy on overall survival (OS) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (NU). METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with UTUC of the renal pelvis who were diagnosed with renal cortical tumors and underwent RN (n = 820) with subsequent surgical pathology demonstrating urothelial carcinoma were identified. These patients were compared to those diagnosed with renal pelvis tumors who appropriately underwent NU (n = 16,464) between 2005 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine patient, facility and tumor-related factors associated with undergoing RN. The impact of surgery (RN vs NU) on OS was determined by Cox-regression after propensity score matching. RESULTS A total of 4.7% patients with UTUC underwent inadvertent RN. Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.62, 95%CI 1.23-2.13), larger tumors, advanced tumor stage, and high-grade tumors (P < 0.0001) were associated with RN. However, surgery at a facility performing a higher volume of NU/year was associated with lower odds of having RN performed (aOR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75-0.97). After propensity score matching, the 5-year OS was 39.9% for those undergoing RN vs 49.9% for those undergoing NU (hazard ratio 1.45, 95%CI 1.30-1.62). CONCLUSION Inadvertent RN is not uncommon, occurring in almost 5% of patients with UTUC in the NCDB. Patients who underwent RN had significantly worse OS as compared to those treated with NU. These data highlight that accurate diagnosis of UTUC is paramount and clinicians should not hesitate to perform further workup when imaging findings are equivocal.
Collapse
|
47
|
Murakami T, Kikuchi E, Ide H, Umezawa Y, Takahashi T, Izawa M, Hakozaki K, Shigeta K, Ogihara K, Kobayashi H, Kanai K, Maeda T, Yoshimine S, Mizuno R, Nishimoto K, Oya M. Oncological outcomes of dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 2:322-330. [PMID: 35474877 PMCID: PMC8988766 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction were associated with worse clinical outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients. Patients and methods One hundred and fifty one metastatic UC patients who received first‐line gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) salvage chemotherapy without a previous history of peri‐surgical chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Patients with endogenous creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min or more were treated with a full dose of cisplatin, while those with 45‐59 and 30‐44 mL/min were treated with 75% and 50% doses, respectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on the average administered dose of cisplatin of 100% (Group A, N = 43), 99%‐75% (Group B, N = 59), and less than 75% (Group C, N = 49), and therapeutic responses and the toxicity of GC were compared. Results Complete response rates were 9.3%, 13.6%, and 14.3% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. One‐year progression‐free survival rates were 22.9%, 31.1%, and 36.7% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. One‐year cancer‐specific survival rates were 56.1%, 71.1%, and 68.3% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. A multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that the dose of cisplatin was not an independent prognostic factor for disease progression and cancer death. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of severe adverse events. Conclusions Dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction did not worsen clinical outcomes for metastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsushi Murakami
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Department of Urology Saitama City Hospital Saitama Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Department of Urology St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan
| | - Hiroki Ide
- Department of Urology Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Yuta Umezawa
- Department of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan
| | - Takayuki Takahashi
- Department of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan
| | - Mizuki Izawa
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Department of Urology Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Kyohei Hakozaki
- Department of Urology National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama Japan
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Koichiro Ogihara
- Department of Urology Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Kunimitsu Kanai
- Department of Urology National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital Saitama Japan
| | - Takahiro Maeda
- Department of Urology Kawasaki Municipal Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | | | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Koshiro Nishimoto
- Department of UroOncology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
De Lorenzis E, Albo G, Longo F, Bebi C, Boeri L, Montanari E. Current Knowledge on Genomic Profiling of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12030333. [PMID: 33668859 PMCID: PMC7996334 DOI: 10.3390/genes12030333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent research in next-generation sequencing characterized the genomic landscape of urothelial cancer. However, the majority of the studies focused on bladder cancer (BC). Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC) and BC share some histological characteristics, but, considering the differences in terms of embryologic precursors, epidemiology, genetics, medical and surgical management and response to therapy, UTUC and BC should be considered as two distinct diseases. Our objective is to analyze through a literature search the latest updates and the current knowledge about the genomics of UTUC. We also evaluate genetic differences between BC and UTUC and the potential implications for systemic therapy. Molecular subtyping and variant histology and their correlation with response to chemotherapy were also explored. In summary, the most frequent genomic variations in UTUC included FGFR3, chromatin remodeling genes, TP53/MDM2 and other tumor suppressors/oncogenes. The genomics of UTUC, integrated with clinical data, could drive the selection of patients who could benefit from targeted therapy or off-label treatment. Routine implementation of tumor genomic characterization in UTUC patients should therefore be contemplated and evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa De Lorenzis
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-55034546; Fax: +39-02-50320584
| | - Giancarlo Albo
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Longo
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
| | - Carolina Bebi
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
- University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
- University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.A.); (F.L.); (C.B.); (L.B.); (E.M.)
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Margulis V, Ghandour RA, Singla N. Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Indications and Technique. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To acquaint urologists with aristolochic acid nephropathy, an iatrogenic disease that poses a distinct threat to global public health. In China alone, 100 million people may currently be at risk. We illustrate the power of molecular epidemiology in establishing the cause of this disease. RECENT FINDINGS Molecular epidemiologic approaches and novel mechanistic information established a causative linkage between exposure to aristolochic acid and urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and upper urinary tract. Noninvasive tests are available that detect urothelial cancers through the genetic analysis of urinary DNA. Combined with cytology, some of these tests can detect 95% of patients at risk of developing bladder and/or upper urothelial tract cancer. Robust biomarkers, including DNA-adduct and mutational signature analysis, unequivocally identify aristolochic acid-induced tumours. The high mutational load associated with aristolochic acid-induced tumours renders them candidates for immune-checkpoint therapy. SUMMARY Guided by recent developments that facilitate early detection of urothelial cancers, the morbidity and mortality associated with aristolochic acid-induced bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinomas may be substantially reduced. The molecular epidemiology tools that define aristolochic acid-induced tumours may be applicable to other studies assessing potential environmental carcinogens.
Collapse
|