Effect of enprostil on glucose and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes

Effect of misoprostol (PGE1) on glucose metabolism in type-2-diabetic and control subjects

In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that prostaglandins of the E series enhance muscle glucose uptake. We examined the effect of acute misoprostol (PGE1) administration on whole body insulin-mediated glucose disposal, as well as the major intracellular pathways of glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetic (n = 10) and non-diabetic (n = 4) subjects. Each subject received two 240-min euglycaemic insulin (40 mU/m2/min) clamp studies with tritiated glucose and indirect calorimetry. During one of the insulin clamp studies, 200 microg of misoprostol was ingested at 90 and 150 min after the start of the insulin infusion. Insulin-mediated total body glucose disposal, glycolysis, glycogenesis and glucose oxidation were similar during the insulin clamp studies performed without and with misoprostol in both the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. These results demonstrate that the acute administration of misoprostol does not enhance insulin-mediated glucose disposal in either type-2-diabetic or non-diabetic subjects.

Enprostil impairs cholesterol and fat absorption

BACKGROUND

Enprostil, a synthetic dehydroprostaglandin E2 structural analogue primarily developed for treatment of gastritis, has been shown also to lower serum cholesterol.

METHODS

We studied cholesterol metabolism in seven hypercholesterolemic subjects before, during, and after a low-dose enprostil (18 micrograms/day) treatment, measuring serum lipids, cholesterol absorption by an oral double-isotope method, fecal cholesterol elimination by the balance technique, and fecal fat. In addition, an oral fat load test with vitamin A was performed.

RESULTS

The drug treatment reduced serum concentrations of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by 8.2% and 7.9% (p < 0.05), respectively, and cholesterol absorption efficiency by 18% (p < 0.05), and increased fecal output of neutral sterols by 20% (p < 0.05), bile acids by 24% (NS), and cholesterol synthesis by 30% (p < 0.05). Postabsorptive concentrations of triglycerides and vitamin A in chylomicrons were reduced 3-4 h after the intake of the test meal. Fecal fat excretion was doubled during the enprostil treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Enprostil reduces serum cholesterol concentrations, apparently by inhibiting cholesterol absorption so that fecal cholesterol elimination is increased in association with a mild fat malabsorption. Enhanced intestinal motility may contribute to these changes, frequently causing abdominal fullness or mild pain without diarrhea.