A prospective study of painful symptoms, small-fibre function and peripheral vascular disease in chronic painful diabetic neuropathy

Corneal nerve loss is related to the severity of painful diabetic neuropathy

Background and purpose

Previously it has been shown that patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) have greater corneal nerve loss compared to patients with painless diabetic neuropathy. This study investigated if the severity of corneal nerve loss was related to the severity of PDN.

Methods

Participants with diabetic neuropathy (n = 118) and healthy controls (n = 38) underwent clinical and neurological evaluation, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction testing and corneal confocal microscopy and were categorized into those with no (n = 43), mild (n = 34) and moderate‐to‐severe (n = 41) neuropathic pain.

Results

Corneal nerve fibre density (p = 0.003), corneal nerve fibre length (p < 0.0001) and cold perception threshold (p < 0.0001) were lower and warm perception threshold was higher (p = 0.002) in patients with more severe pain, but there was no significant difference in the neuropathy disability score (p = 0.5), vibration perception threshold (p = 0.5), sural nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.3) and amplitude (p = 0.7), corneal nerve branch density (p = 0.06) and deep breathing heart rate variability (p = 0.08) between patients with differing severity of PDN. The visual analogue scale correlated significantly with corneal nerve fibre density (r = −0.3, p = 0.0002), corneal nerve branch density (r = −0.3, p = 0.001) and corneal nerve fibre length (r = −0.4, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating curve analysis showed that corneal nerve fibre density had an area under the curve of 0.78 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.72 for the diagnosis of PDN.

Conclusions

Corneal confocal microscopy reveals increasing corneal nerve fibre loss with increasing severity of neuropathic pain and a good diagnostic outcome for identifying patients with PDN.

Changes in expression of Kv7.5 and Kv7.2 channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons in the streptozotocin rat model of painful diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), the most debilitating complication of diabetes mellitus, is resistant to current therapy. The pathogenesis of DPNP is still elusive, but several mechanisms have been proposed including abnormal hyperexcitability of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. The underlying molecular mechanisms of such aberrant hyperexcitability are incompletely understood. Using the streptozotocin (STZ) rat model of DPNP, we have recently provided evidence implicating neuronal K_v7 channels that normally exert a powerful stabilizing influence on neuronal excitability, in the abnormal hyperexcitability of DRG neurons and in pain hypersensitivity associated with DPNP. In the present immunohistochemical study, we sought to determine whether K_v7.2 and/or K_v7.5 channel expression is altered in DRG neurons in STZ rats. We found 35 days post-STZ: (1) a significant decrease in K_v7.5-immunoreactivity in small (<30 μm) DRG neurons (both IB4 positive and IB4 negative) and medium-sized (30-40 μm) neurons, and (2) a significant increase in K_v7.2-immunoreactivity in small (<30 μm) neurons, and a non-significant increase in medium/large neurons. The decrease in K_v7.5 channel expression in small and medium-sized DRG neurons in STZ rats is likely to contribute to the mechanisms of hyperexcitability of these neurons and thereby to the resulting pain hypersensitivity associated with DPNP. The upregulation of K_v7.2 subunit in small DRG neurons may be an activity dependent compensatory mechanism to limit STZ-induced hyperexcitability of DRG neurons and the associated pain hypersensitivity. The findings support the notion that K_v7 channels may represent a novel target for DPNP treatment.

Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials

AIM

To assess lower extremity decompression nerve surgery (DNS) to treat the consequences of diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, and related registries were searched through December 2017 to identify randomized, quasi-randomized or observational trials that evaluated the efficacy of lower extremity DNS on pain relief (primary outcome) or other secondary outcomes. Observational studies were included, given investigators' reluctance to use sham surgery controls. Outcome effect size was estimated, and a weighted average was calculated.

RESULTS

Eight of 23 studies evaluated pain relief, including a double-blind randomized controlled trial (with a sham surgery leg), an unblinded trial with a nonsurgical control leg, and 6 observational studies. All reported substantial pain relief post-DNS with average effect sizes between two and five. Unexpectedly, the double-blind trial showed improvement in the sham leg comparable to the DNS leg and exceeding the improvement observed in the nonsurgical leg in the unblinded study. Sensory testing showed generally favorable results supporting DNS, and nerve conduction velocities increased post-DNS relative to deterioration in controls. Ultrasound revealed fusiform nerve swelling near compression sites. Morphological results of DNS were generally favorable but inconsistent, whereas hemodynamic measures showed a positive effect on arterial parameters, as did transcutaneous oximetry (improved microcirculation). The incidence of initial and recurrent neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers appeared reduced post-DNS relative to the contralateral foot (borderline significant).

CONCLUSION

The data remain insufficient to recommend DNS for painful DPN, given conflicting and unexpectedly positive results involving sham surgery relative to unblinded controls. The generally supportive sensory and nerve conduction results are compromised by methodological issues, whereas more favorable results support DNS to prevent new or recurrent neuropathic foot ulcers. Future studies need to clarify subject selection vis-à-vis DPN vs superimposed compressed nerves, utilize appropriate validated instruments, and readdress use of sham surgical controls in light of recent results.

Predictors of response to treatment with actovegin for 6 months in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic polyneuropathy

AIMS

To evaluate two definitions of response and the predictive value of baseline covariates for response to actovegin treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with symptomatic diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN).

METHODS

Response to 6-months treatment with actovegin or placebo was defined as a clinically meaningful decline from baseline to 6months in (1) both Neuropathy Impairment Score of Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) ≥2 points and Total Symptom Score (TSS) >50% and (2) NIS-LL ≥2 points only. Nineteen baseline covariates were evaluated using separate logistic regression models and either both NIS-LL and TSS or NIS-LL response definitions.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis included 567 patients. Actovegin treatment compared to placebo was associated with better odds of response (OR [95% CI] of 1.73 [1.21-2.48] for definition 1 and 1.94 [1.33-2.84] for definition 2). Significant interaction with actovegin treatment was noted only for baseline use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensinogen converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), resulting in a reduced treatment response (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Actovegin treatment was associated with a clinically meaningful response in neuropathic symptoms and/or impairments in patients with symptomatic DSPN. Since only one predictor of response to actovegin treatment was identified, this drug seems an appropriate therapy for the majority of patients with DSPN.

Efficient conditioned pain modulation despite pain persistence in painful diabetic neuropathy

Despite persistent clinical pain in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy, longer pain duration was associated with more efficient CPM.

Introduction:

Alleviation of pain, by either medical or surgical therapy, is accompanied by transition from less efficient, or pro-nociceptive, to efficient conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Spontaneous decrease or resolution of pain with disease progression is reported for some patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

Objectives:

To explore whether CPM changes similarly in parallel to spontaneous resolution of pain in PDN patients.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, thirty-three patients with PDN underwent psychophysical assessment of pain modulation on the forearm, remote from the clinical pain.

Results:

Pain duration was not correlated with neuropathic pain intensity, yet, it correlated with CPM efficiency; patients with longer pain duration had same pain level, but more efficient CPM than those with short-pain duration (ρ = −0.417; P = 0.025, Spearman correlation). Patients with pain more than 2 years (median split) expressed efficient CPM that was not different from that of healthy controls. These patients also had lower temporal summation of pain than the short-pain duration patients group (P < 0.05). The 2 patient groups did not differ in clinical pain characteristics or use of analgesics.

Conclusion:

Pro-nociception, expressed by less efficient CPM and high temporal summation that usually accompanies clinical painful conditions, seems to “normalize” with chronicity of the pain syndrome. This is despite continuing pain, suggesting that pro-nociceptivity in pain syndromes is multifactorial. Because the pain modulation profile affects success of therapy, this suggests that different drugs might express different efficacy pending on duration of the pain in patients with PDN.

Practical Management of Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Purpose

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life, affecting sleep, mood, mobility, ability to work, interpersonal relationships, overall self-worth, and independence. The purpose of this article is to provide diabetes educators with current and essential tools for PDN assessment and management.

Methods

Medline and CINAHL database searches identified publications on the assessment and treatment of PDN. Identified research was evaluated, and information pertinent to diabetes educators was summarized.

Results

Recent advancements in assessment of neuropathic pain include identifying characteristics that distinguish between neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain. In the absence of treatment, research demonstrates that nerve damage may progress while pain diminishes. Many disease-modifying and symptom-management treatment options are available.

Conclusion

Good glycemic control is the first priority for both prevention and management of PDN. However, even with good glycemic control, up to 20% of patients will develop PDN. PDN recognition and assessment are critical to optimize management. Although several treatment modalities are available, few patients obtain complete pain relief. Recent advances in understanding the mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain should lead to better treatment and patient outcomes. Combination therapy, including nonpharmacologic modalities, may be required. Research evaluating the efficacy of combination therapy is needed.

Diabetic neuropathy: achieving best practice

Peripheral neuropathy is one of the commonest complications of diabetes and the commonest form of neuropathy in the developed world.1 Diabetic polyneuropathy encompasses several neuropathic syndromes, and the commonest presentation is chronic distal symmetrical neuropathy (DSP). DSP, often associated with autonomic neuropathy, has two clinical consequences: namely neuropathic pain and foot ulceration. Both often occur in the same individual, and cause severe curtailment of quality of life. The other, less common presentations of diabetic polyneuropathy include acute painful neuropathies, and focal neuropathies (amyotrophy, pressure palsies, truncal radiculopathies, mononeuropathies and mononeuritis multiplex).2 Table 1 shows a recent classification of diabetic polyneuropathy based upon the natural history of the various syndromes.3

Virus-Mediated Knockdown of Nav1.3 in Dorsal Root Ganglia of STZ-Induced Diabetic Rats Alleviates Tactile Allodynia

Diabetic neuropathic pain affects a substantial number of people and represents a major public health problem. Available clinical treatments for diabetic neuropathic pain remain only partially effective and many of these treatments carry the burden of side effects or the risk of dependence. The misexpression of sodium channels within nociceptive neurons contributes to abnormal electrical activity associated with neuropathic pain. Voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.3 produces tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents with rapid repriming kinetics and has been shown to contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability and ectopic firing in injured neurons. Suppression of Nav1.3 activity can attenuate neuropathic pain induced by peripheral nerve injury. Previous studies have shown that expression of Nav1.3 is upregulated in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons of diabetic rats that exhibit neuropathic pain. Here, we hypothesized that viral-mediated knockdown of Nav1.3 in painful diabetic neuropathy would reduce neuropathic pain. We used a validated recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV)-shRNA-Nav1.3 vector to knockdown expression of Nav1.3, via a clinically applicable intrathecal injection method. Three weeks following vector administration, we observed a significant rate of transduction in DRGs of diabetic rats that concomitantly reduced neuronal excitability of dorsal horn neurons and reduced behavioral evidence of tactile allodynia. Taken together, these findings offer a novel gene therapy approach for addressing chronic diabetic neuropathic pain.

Nociception at the diabetic foot, an uncharted territory

The diabetic foot is characterised by painless foot ulceration and/or arthropathy; it is a typical complication of painless diabetic neuropathy. Neuropathy depletes the foot skin of intraepidermal nerve fibre endings of the afferent A-delta and C-fibres, which are mostly nociceptors and excitable by noxious stimuli only. However, some of them are cold or warm receptors whose functions in diabetic neuropathy have frequently been reported. Hence, it is well established by quantitative sensory testing that thermal detection thresholds at the foot skin increase during the course of painless diabetic neuropathy. Pain perception (nociception), by contrast, has rarely been studied. Recent pilot studies of pinprick pain at plantar digital skinfolds showed that the perception threshold was always above the upper limit of measurement of 512 mN (equivalent to 51.2 g) at the diabetic foot. However, deep pressure pain perception threshold at musculus abductor hallucis was beyond 1400 kPa (equivalent to 14 kg; limit of measurement) only in every fifth case. These discrepancies of pain perception between forefoot and hindfoot, and between skin and muscle, demand further study. Measuring nociception at the feet in diabetes opens promising clinical perspectives. A critical nociception threshold may be quantified (probably corresponding to a critical number of intraepidermal nerve fibre endings), beyond which the individual risk of a diabetic foot rises appreciably. Staging of diabetic neuropathy according to nociception thresholds at the feet is highly desirable as guidance to an individualised injury prevention strategy.

Contributions of purinergic P2X3 receptors within the midbrain periaqueductal gray to diabetes-induced neuropathic pain

Hyperalgesia and allodynia are commonly observed in patients with diabetic neuropathy. The mechanisms responsible for neuropathic pain are not well understood. Thus, in this study, we examined the role played by purinergic P2X3 receptors of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) in modulating diabetes-induced neuropathic pain because this brain region is an important component of the descending inhibitory system to control central pain transmission. Our results showed that mechanical withdrawal thresholds were significantly increased by stimulation of P2X3 receptors in the dorsolateral PAG of rats (n = 12, P < 0.05 vs. vehicle control) using α,β-methylene-ATP (α,β-meATP, a P2X3 receptor agonist). In addition, diabetes was induced by an intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ) in rats, and mechanical allodynia was observed 3 weeks after STZ administration. Notably, the excitatory effects of P2X3 stimulation on mechanical withdrawal thresholds were significantly blunted in STZ-induced diabetic rats (n = 12, P < 0.05 vs. control animals) as compared with control rats (n = 12). Furthermore, the protein expression of P2X3 receptors in the plasma membrane of the dorsolateral PAG of STZ-treated rats was significantly decreased (n = 10, P < 0.05 vs. control animals) compared to that in control rats (n = 8), whereas the total expression of P2X3 receptors was not significantly altered. Overall, data of our current study suggest that a decrease in the membrane expression of P2X3 receptors in the PAG of diabetic rats is likely to impair the descending inhibitory system in modulating pain transmission and thereby contributes to the development of mechanical allodynia in diabetes.

Screening for neuropathic characteristics in failed back surgery syndromes: challenges for guiding treatment

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain screening tools have shown promise in identifying common neuropathic pain characteristics that derive from diverse etiologies (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia). However, no prior studies have specifically assessed whether these tools are capable of discerning the underlying pain mechanisms in the vast, heterogeneous group of patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).

DESIGN

In this clinical observational study, two tests for neuropathic pain characteristics, the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 (DN4) and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) questionnaires, were performed on 43 subjects with FBSS. Subjects underwent physical or neurosensory exam components of the DN4 and LANSS in the region of most severe pain (e.g., axial low back or lower extremities). DN4 and LANSS scores were correlated with clinical history and neurologic exam, pain-related quality of life questionnaires, and compared to an independent assessment of pain distribution.

RESULTS

The presence of neuropathic characteristics, determined by the DN4 (62% sensitivity, 44% specificity), LANSS (38% sensitivity, 75% specificity; cut-offs of 4 and 12, respectively), or their combination (20% sensitivity, 58% specificity) was associated with higher pain intensity as measured by the visual analog scale (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.042), modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.082), and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.001), and greater pain-related functional impairment as measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (DN4 > 4, P = 0.006; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.018). The percentage of subjects characterized as neuropathic by the DN4 and LANSS lacked concordance (67.4 vs. 25.6), and the distribution of most severe symptoms (i.e., axial vs radicular) did not correlate with subjects determined to have neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike other neuropathic syndromes, the neuropathic component of FBSS is less reliably identified by the LANSS and DN4.

Recent advances in the management of diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy

There is now little doubt that poor blood glucose control is an important risk factor for the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Furthermore, traditional cardiovascular risk factors for macrovascular disease appear to be associated with an increased risk of DPN. The recently established International Expert Group on Diabetic Neuropathy has recommended new criteria for the diagnosis of DPN in the context of clinical and research settings. Studies in experimental diabetes examining the pathogenesis of DPN have identified a number of metabolic abnormalities including polyol pathway hyperactivity, increased advanced glycation end‐point formation, alterations in the protein kinase C beta pathway through diacylglycerol and oxidative stress. There is now strong evidence implicating nerve ischemia as the cause of DPN. Studies in human and animal models have shown reduced nerve perfusion and endoneurial hypoxia. These endoneurial microvascular changes strongly correlate with clinical severity and the degree of nerve‐fiber pathology. Unfortunately, many compounds that have been effective in animal models of neuropathy have not been successful in human diabetic neuropathy. The only compounds found to be efficacious in human diabetic neuropathy, and are in clinical use, are the anti‐oxidant, α‐lipoic acid and the aldose reductase inhibitor, epalrestat. Overall, the evidence emphasizes the importance of vascular dysfunction, driven by metabolic change, in the etiology of DPN, and highlights potential therapeutic approaches. Epidemiological data on diabetic painful neuropathic pain (DPNP) are limited. In one population‐based study, the prevalence of DPNP, as assessed by a structured questionnaire and examination, was estimated at 16%. It was notable that, of these patients, 12.5% had never reported symptoms to their doctor and 39% had never received treatment for their pain. Thus, despite being common, DPNP continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. Pharmacological treatment of DPNP include tricyclic compounds, serotonin noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors, the anti‐oxidant α‐lipoic acid, anticonvulsants, opiates, membrane stabilizers, topical capsaicin and so on. Management of the patient with DPNP must be tailored to individual requirements and will depend on the presence of other comorbidities. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00083.x)

Painful diabetic neuropathy: clinical aspects

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of several clinical syndromes in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and presents a major challenge for optimal management. The epidemiology of PDN has not been extensively studied. On the basis of available data, the prevalence of pain ranges from 10% to 20% in patients with diabetes and from 40% to 50% in those with diabetic neuropathy. Neuropathic pain can be disabling and devastating, with a significant impact on the patient's quality of life and associated healthcare cost. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying PDN are similar to other neuropathic pain disorders and broadly invoke peripheral and central sensitization. The natural course of PDN is variable, with the majority of patients experiencing spontaneous improvement and resolution of pain. Quantifying neuropathic pain is difficult, especially in clinical practice, but has improved recently in clinical trials with the development of neuropathic pain-specific tools, such as the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Hyperglycemia-induced pathways result in nerve dysfunction and damage, which lead to hyperexcitable peripheral and central pathways of pain. Glycemic control may prevent or partially reverse DPN and modulate PDN.

Temperature threshold testing: a systematic review

The diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) has been recently defined as typical symptoms due to small nerve fiber dysfunction accompanied by reduced intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) or abnormal temperature threshold testing (TTT). Guidelines have been published for the assessment of IENFD. However, international guidelines for TTT are lacking. This paper presents a systematic literature review on reported TTT methods and provides recommendations for its future use in studies evaluating patients. A total of 164 papers fulfilled pre-defined requirements and were selected for review. Over 15 types of instruments are currently being used with a variety of methodological approaches for location, stimulus application, and sensation qualities examined. Consensus is needed to standardize the use of TTT as a diagnostic and follow-up tool in patients.

Mechanisms and management of diabetic painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy

Although a number of the diabetic neuropathies may result in painful symptomatology, this review focuses on the most common: chronic sensorimotor distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN). It is estimated that 15-20% of diabetic patients may have painful DSPN, but not all of these will require therapy. In practice, the diagnosis of DSPN is a clinical one, whereas for longitudinal studies and clinical trials, quantitative sensory testing and electrophysiological assessment are usually necessary. A number of simple numeric rating scales are available to assess the frequency and severity of neuropathic pain. Although the exact pathophysiological processes that result in diabetic neuropathic pain remain enigmatic, both peripheral and central mechanisms have been implicated, and extend from altered channel function in peripheral nerve through enhanced spinal processing and changes in many higher centers. A number of pharmacological agents have proven efficacy in painful DSPN, but all are prone to side effects, and none impact the underlying pathophysiological abnormalities because they are only symptomatic therapy. The two first-line therapies approved by regulatory authorities for painful neuropathy are duloxetine and pregabalin. α-Lipoic acid, an antioxidant and pathogenic therapy, has evidence of efficacy but is not licensed in the U.S. and several European countries. All patients with DSPN are at increased risk of foot ulceration and require foot care, education, and if possible, regular podiatry assessment.

Painful and painless diabetic neuropathy: one disease or two?

Painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) is generally considered a variant of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) but the identification of distinctive aspects that characterize painful compared with painless DPN has however been addressed in many studies, mainly with the purpose of better understanding the mechanisms of neuropathic pain in the scenario of peripheral nerve damage of DPN, of determining risk markers for pain development, and also of recognizing who might respond to treatments. This review is aimed at examining available literature dealing with the issue of similarities and differences between painful and painless DPN in an attempt to respond to the question of whether painful and painless DPN are the same disease or not and to address the conundrum of why some people develop the insensate variety of DPN whilst others experience distressing pain. Thus, from the perspective of comparing painful with painless forms of DPN, this review considers the clinical correlates of PDPN, its distinctive framework of symptoms, signs, and nerve functional and structural abnormalities, the question of large and small fiber involvement, the peripheral pain mechanisms, the central processing of pain and some new insights into the pathogenesis of pain in peripheral polyneuropathies and PDPN.

Quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic unilateral radicular neuropathic pain and active spinal cord stimulation

Objectives.  Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option for chronic radicular neuropathic pain syndromes. This prospective study was performed to examine the peripheral effects of SCS on sensation using quantitative sensory testing (QST). Materials and Methods.  We measured two consecutive QST measurements for thermal, tactile-static, tactile-dynamic, vibratory, and pain sensation of the lower limbs in seven patients with chronic unilateral radicular neuropathic pain who underwent SCS implantation for their pain. Measurements were performed when SCS was turned off and once again during SCS and subsequent reduced pain levels. Results.  Baseline QST demonstrated significantly increased thresholds for tactile and warm and cold detection in the pain area. With SCS active, a significant reduction of the cold and warm perception and mechanical detection thresholds was found on the painful side (p < 0.01). Although not significant (p > 0.01), altered sensory thresholds with active SCS also were found at the healthy side where no paresthesias were felt. Conclusion.  SCS leads to bilateral subclinical effects even if the evoked paresthesias are only unilateral. Pain perception thresholds are not altered with therapeutic SCS.

Pharmacologic management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is a debilitating and distressing complication that occurs in patients with diabetes mellitus. This article provides an overview of diabetic peripheral neuropathy focusing on DPNP.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of diabetic neuropathy and neuropathic pain. A comprehensive and systematic Medline search of the published literature for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was done from 1965 to December 2012. Studies not in English language were excluded.

EXPERT OPINION

Neuropathic pain is difficult to treat, and patients rarely experience complete pain relief. Despite several pharmacological agents being used in the treatment of DPNP, only duloxetine and pregabalin have evidence-based support for controlling DPNP.

Guidelines in the management of diabetic nerve pain: clinical utility of pregabalin

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes. It presents as a variety of syndromes for which there is no universally accepted unique classification. Sensorimotor polyneuropathy is the most common type, affecting about 30% of diabetic patients in hospital care and 25% of those in the community. Pain is the reason for 40% of patient visits in a primary care setting, and about 20% of these have had pain for greater than 6 months. Chronic pain may be nociceptive, which occurs as a result of disease or damage to tissue with no abnormality in the nervous system. In contrast, neuropathic pain is defined as "pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system." Persistent neuropathic pain interferes significantly with quality of life, impairing sleep and recreation; it also significantly impacts emotional well-being, and is associated with depression, anxiety, and noncompliance with treatment. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a difficult-to-manage clinical problem, and patients with this condition are more apt to seek medical attention than those with other types of diabetic neuropathy. Early recognition of psychological problems is critical to the management of pain, and physicians need to go beyond the management of pain per se if they are to achieve success. This evidence-based review of the assessment of the patient with pain in diabetes addresses the state-of-the-art management of pain, recognizing all the conditions that produce pain in diabetes and the evidence in support of a variety of treatments currently available. A search of the full Medline database for the last 10 years was conducted in August 2012 using the terms painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, painful diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy, painful diabetic neuropathy and pain in diabetes. In addition, recent reviews addressing this issue were adopted as necessary. In particular, reports from the American Academy of Neurology and the Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy were included. Unfortunately, the results of evidence-based studies do not necessarily take into account the presence of comorbidities, the cost of treatment, or the role of third-party payers in decision-making. Thus, this review attempts to give a more balanced view of the management of pain in the diabetic patient with neuropathy and in particular the role of pregabalin.

Maladaptive dendritic spine remodeling contributes to diabetic neuropathic pain

Diabetic neuropathic pain imposes a huge burden on individuals and society, and represents a major public health problem. Despite aggressive efforts, diabetic neuropathic pain is generally refractory to available clinical treatments. A structure-function link between maladaptive dendritic spine plasticity and pain has been demonstrated previously in CNS and PNS injury models of neuropathic pain. Here, we reasoned that if dendritic spine remodeling contributes to diabetic neuropathic pain, then (1) the presence of malformed spines should coincide with the development of pain, and (2) disrupting maladaptive spine structure should reduce chronic pain. To determine whether dendritic spine remodeling contributes to neuropathic pain in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats, we analyzed dendritic spine morphology and electrophysiological and behavioral signs of neuropathic pain. Our results show changes in dendritic spine shape, distribution, and shape on wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons within lamina IV-V of the dorsal horn in diabetes. These diabetes-induced changes were accompanied by WDR neuron hyperexcitability and decreased pain thresholds at 4 weeks. Treatment with NSC23766 (N(6)-[2-[[4-(diethylamino)-1-methylbutyl]amino]-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl]-2-methyl-4,6-quinolinediamine trihydrochloride), a Rac1-specific inhibitor known to interfere with spine plasticity, decreased the presence of malformed spines in diabetes, attenuated neuronal hyperresponsiveness to peripheral stimuli, reduced spontaneous firing activity from WDR neurons, and improved nociceptive mechanical pain thresholds. At 1 week after STZ injection, animals with hyperglycemia with no evidence of pain had few or no changes in spine morphology. These results demonstrate that diabetes-induced maladaptive dendritic spine remodeling has a mechanistic role in neuropathic pain. Molecular pathways that control spine morphogenesis and plasticity may be promising future targets for treatment.

Clinical Approach to the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Painful neuropathy is a common and often progressive complication of diabetes. Patients frequently report symptoms of tingling, burning, lancinating pain, hyperesthesia and allodynia. The natural history of the disease may vary from intermittent mild symptoms to severe chronic daily pain; the latter is often associated with diminished quality of life. There are a variety of pharmaceutical agents from different medicinal categories available for the symptomatic treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy, however selecting an agent is often challenging given the breadth of choices and lack of consistent guidelines. As a result, many patients remain untreated or undertreated.This article presents a practical clinical approach to the treatment of pain in diabetic neuropathy. Recommendations for first, second and third line medications are based on specific evidence for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy as well as safety, tolerability, drug interactions and cost. Additional topics of discussion include breakthrough pain, opioid use and topical therapies. This review does not comprehensively discuss all possible treatments for painful neuropathy, but provides a systematic approach designed to guide clinicians in tailoring therapies to the individual patient.

Cannabinoid-mediated modulation of neuropathic pain and microglial accumulation in a model of murine type I diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequency of diabetes mellitus and its relationship to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and neuropathic pain (NeP), our understanding of underlying mechanisms leading to chronic pain in diabetes remains poor. Recent evidence has demonstated a prominent role of microglial cells in neuropathic pain states. One potential therapeutic option gaining clinical acceptance is the cannabinoids, for which cannabinoid receptors (CB) are expressed on neurons and microglia. We studied the accumulation and activation of spinal and thalamic microglia in streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic CD1 mice and the impact of cannabinoid receptor agonism/antagonism during the development of a chronic NeP state. We provided either intranasal or intraperitoneal cannabinoid agonists/antagonists at multiple doses both at the initiation of diabetes as well as after establishment of diabetes and its related NeP state.

RESULTS

Tactile allodynia and thermal hypersensitivity were observed over 8 months in diabetic mice without intervention. Microglial density increases were seen in the dorsal spinal cord and in thalamic nuclei and were accompanied by elevation of phosphorylated p38 MAPK, a marker of microglial activation. When initiated coincidentally with diabetes, moderate-high doses of intranasal cannabidiol (cannaboid receptor 2 agonist) and intraperitoneal cannabidiol attenuated the development of an NeP state, even after their discontinuation and without modification of the diabetic state. Cannabidiol was also associated with restriction in elevation of microglial density in the dorsal spinal cord and elevation in phosphorylated p38 MAPK. When initiated in an established DPN NeP state, both CB1 and CB2 agonists demonstrated an antinociceptive effect until their discontinuation. There were no pronociceptive effects demonstated for either CB1 or CB2 antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention of microglial accumulation and activation in the dorsal spinal cord was associated with limited development of a neuropathic pain state. Cannabinoids demonstrated antinociceptive effects in this mouse model of DPN. These results suggest that such interventions may also benefit humans with DPN, and their early introduction may also modify the development of the NeP state.

Human cerebral neuropathology of Type 2 diabetes mellitus

The cerebral neuropathology of Type 2 diabetes (CNDM2) has not been positively defined. This review includes a description of CNDM2 research from before the 'Pubmed Era'. Recent neuroimaging studies have focused on cerebrovascular and white matter pathology. These and prior studies about cerebrovascular histopathology in diabetes are reviewed. Evidence is also described for and against the link between CNDM2 and Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. To study this matter directly, we evaluated data from University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center (UK ADC) patients recruited while non-demented and followed longitudinally. Of patients who had come to autopsy (N = 234), 139 met inclusion criteria. These patients provided the basis for comparing the prevalence of pathological and clinical indices between well-characterized cases with (N = 50) or without (N = 89) the premortem diagnosis of diabetes. In diabetics, cerebrovascular pathology was more frequent and Alzheimer-type pathology was less frequent than in non-diabetics. Finally, a series of photomicrographs demonstrates histopathological features (including clinical-radiographical correlation) observed in brains of persons that died after a history of diabetes. These preliminary, correlative, and descriptive studies may help develop new hypotheses about CNDM2. We conclude that more work should be performed on human material in the context of CNDM2.

Switching from pathogenetic treatment with alpha-lipoic acid to gabapentin and other analgesics in painful diabetic neuropathy: a real-world study in outpatients

In this retrospective real-world study, we aimed to evaluate whether switching from the pathogenetic treatment option alpha-lipoic acid to drugs for symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain such as gabapentin would be associated with changes in efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A cohort of 443 diabetic patients with chronic painful neuropathy were treated with alpha-lipoic acid 600 mg qd orally for a mean period of 5 years. After stopping this treatment, 293 patients were switched to gabapentin (600-2400 mg/day), while 150 patients remained untreated because of no acute symptoms. In the untreated group, 110 (73%) patients developed neuropathic symptoms as soon as 2 weeks after the end of treatment with alpha-lipoic acid. In the group started on gabapentin, 131 (45%) patients had to stop taking the drug due to intolerable side effects. Among the patients treated with gabapentin 132 (45%) were responders on an average dose of 1200 mg/day, whereas 161 (55%) were nonresponders at gabapentin doses up to 2400 mg/day. These patients required an alternative treatment which consisted of pregabalin, carbamazepine, amitriptyline, tramadol, or morphine as monotherapy or in combination. The daily costs for alpha-lipoic acid were considerably lower than those for gabapentin or several frequently used drug combinations. The frequency of outpatient visits was 3.8 times per 3 months during the treatment period with alpha-lipoic acid, while it increased to 7.9 per 3 months after switching to gabapentin or the other pain medications. In conclusion, switching from long-term treatment with alpha-lipoic acid to central analgesic drugs such as gabapentin in painful diabetic neuropathy was associated with considerably higher rates of side effects, frequencies of outpatient visits, and daily costs of treatment. The pathogenic treatment option represents for the practicing diabetologist an effective, safe, and cost-effective treatment option for the majority of patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.

Painful diabetic neuropathy: epidemiology, natural history, early diagnosis, and treatment options

OBJECTIVE

To facilitate the clinician's understanding of the basis and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

BACKGROUND

PDN is one of several clinical syndromes in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and presents a major challenge for optimal management.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for articles specific to PDN, using Medline databases between 1966 and 2007.

RESULTS

The epidemiology of PDN has not been well established and on the basis of available data the prevalence of pain is 10% to 20% in patients with diabetes and from 40% to 50% in those with diabetic neuropathy. It has a significant impact on the quality of life and health care costs. Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying PDN are similar to other neuropathic pain disorders and are broadly characterized as peripheral and central sensitization. The natural course of PDN is variable, with many patients experiencing spontaneous improvement and resolution of pain. Hyperglycemia-induced pathways result in nerve dysfunction and damage, which lead to hyperexcitable peripheral and central pathways of pain. Glycemic control may prevent or partially reverse DPN and modulate PDN. Quantifying neuropathic pain is difficult, especially for clinical trials, although this has improved recently with the development of neuropathic pain-specific tools, such as the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Current therapeutic options are limited to symptomatic treatment and are similar to other types of neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of the peripheral and central mechanisms resulting in PDN is likely to promote the development of more targeted and effective treatment.

Strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic pain secondary to diabetic peripheral sensory polyneuropathy

This article proposes a strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic pain due to diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy, based on 15 years of experience in French pain-management centres and on the available literature. In the diabetic patient with chronic pain in the lower limbs, the first step in the diagnostic process is to identify the neuropathic origin of the pain. The second step is to evaluate the patient's medical history and make a rigorous baseline assessment of the neuropathic pain symptoms to determine an effective pain-management strategy. In the third step, adequate and well-tolerated treatment directed towards a variety of painful symptoms is selected, taking into account other co-morbidities such as anxiety and depression. This report reports on the clinical aspects of neuropathic pain exhibited by patients with diabetic sensory polyneuropathy, and the key factors in their diagnosis and treatment, based on the results of meta-analyses and on a recent expert consensus.

Animal models of painful diabetic neuropathy: the STZ rat model

Painful peripheral neuropathy is a common secondary complication of diabetes. The streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rat is the most commonly employed animal model used to study mechanisms of painful diabetic neuropathy and to evaluate potential therapies. A low dose STZ protocol is described for inducing experimental diabetes in the rat. Several behavioral assays are described, which are routinely used to assess different aspects of neuropathic pain in this animal model of diabetes mellitus, including mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia.

Painful diabetic neuropathy: treatment and future aspects

Around one of three diabetic patients is affected by distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) which represents a major health problem, as it may present with partly excruciating neuropathic pain and is responsible for substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Treatment is based on four cornerstones: (1) multifactorial intervention aimed at (near)-normoglycaemia and reduction in cardiovascular risk factors, (2) treatment based on pathogenetic mechanisms, (3) symptomatic treatment, and (4) avoidance of risk factors and complications. Among the pathogenetic treatments only alpha-lipoic acid and epalrestat are available for treatment in several countries. Neuropathic pain, which is present in 8-26% of diabetic patients, exerts a substantial impact on the quality of life, particularly by causing considerable interference in sleep and enjoyment of life. Non-pharmacologic options such as nerve or muscle stimulation should always be given consideration. Among the centrally acting analgesic drugs for many years mainly the tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), carbamazepine, gabapentin, and opioids have been used to treat neuropathic pain. More recently, significant pain relief has been reported in clinical trials of painful diabetic neuropathy using agents such as the dual selective serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), duloxetine and the anticonvulsant pregabalin, a specific modulator of the alpha(2)delta subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channels. A promising new anticonvulsant is lacosamide. In future, drug combinations might also include those aimed at symptomatic pain relief and quality of life on one hand and improvement or slowing the progression of the underlying neuropathic process on the other hand.

Concurrent activation of the somatosensory forebrain and deactivation of periaqueductal gray associated with diabetes-induced neuropathic pain

We combined behavioral testing with brain imaging using (99m)Tc-HMPAO (Amersham Health) to identify CNS structures reflecting alterations in pain perception in the streptozotocin (STZ) model of type I diabetes. We induced diabetic hyperglycemia (blood glucose >300 mg/dl) by injecting male Sprague-Dawley rats with STZ (45 mg/kg i.p.). Four weeks after STZ-diabetic rats exhibited behaviors indicative of neuropathic pain (hypersensitivity thermal stimuli) and this hypersensitivity persisted for up to 6 weeks. Imaging data in STZ-diabetic rats revealed significant increases in the activation of brain regions involved in pain processing after 6 weeks duration of diabetes. These regions included secondary somatosensory cortex, ventrobasal thalamic nuclei and the basolateral amygdala. In contrast, the activation in habenular nuclei and the midbrain periaqueductal gray were markedly decreased in STZ rats. These data suggest that pain in diabetic neuropathy may be due in part to hyperactivity in somatosensory structures coupled with a concurrent deactivation of structures mediating antinociception.

Management of painful diabetic neuropathy: what is new or in the pipeline for 2007?

Approximately one of three diabetic patients is affected by distal symmetric polyneuropathy, which represents a major health problem because it may present with partly excruciating neuropathic pain and is responsible for substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Treatment is based on three cornerstones: 1) multifactorial intervention aimed at (near)-normoglycemia and reduction in cardiovascular risk factors; 2) treatment based on pathogenetic mechanisms; and 3) symptomatic treatment. Among the pathogenetic treatments, alpha-lipoic acid is the only available drug in several countries. Significant relief of neuropathic pain has recently been reported for duloxetine and pregabalin. Among at least 50 new drugs for treatment of neuropathic pain in the pipelines, there are several promising candidates such as lacosamide. Individual tolerability remains a major aspect in any treatment decision.

Comparable myelinated nerve pathology in feline and human diabetes mellitus

The occurrence of diabetic neuropathy in cats provides an opportunity to study the development and treatment of neurological complications not present in diabetic rodent models, where few pathological alterations are evident. The present study further defines pathological alterations in nerve biopsies from 12 cats with spontaneously occurring diabetes mellitus. Peroneal nerve biopsies displayed concurrent injury to both Schwann cells and axons of myelinated fibers that was remarkably similar to that present in human diabetic neuropathy. In addition to demyelination, remyelination (constituting 20-84% of the total myelinated fiber population) was indicated by fibers with inappropriately thin myelin sheaths. Unlike our previous investigations, striking axonal injury was apparent, and consisted of dystrophic accumulations of membranous debris or neurofilaments, as well as degenerative fiber loss resulting in a 50% decrease in myelinated fiber density. In spite of extensive fiber loss, regenerative clusters were apparent, suggesting that axonal regeneration was not completely frustrated. These data highlight the potential utility of feline diabetic neuropathy as a model that faithfully replicates the nerve injury in human diabetes mellitus.

Treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy: Update 2006

At least one of four diabetic patients is affected by distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP), which represents a major health problem, as it may present with partly excruciating neuropathic pain and is responsible for substantial morbidity, increased mortality, and impaired quality of life. Treatment is based on four cornerstones: (a) causal treatment aimed at (near)-normoglycemia, (b) treatment based on pathogenetic mechanisms, (c) symptomatic treatment, and (d) avoidance of risk factors and complications. Recent experimental studies suggest a multifactorial pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. From the clinical point of view it is important to note that, on the basis of these pathogenetic mechanisms, therapeutic approaches could be derived, some of which are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Among these agents only alpha-lipoic acid is available for treatment in several countries and epalrestat in Japan. Although several novel analgesic drugs, such as duloxetine and pregabalin, have recently been introduced into clinical practice, the pharmacological treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy remains a challenge for the physician. Individual tolerability remains a major aspect in any treatment decision. Epidemiological data indicate that not only increased alcohol consumption but also the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, smoking, and visceral obesity, play a role in development and progression of diabetic neuropathy and, hence, need to be prevented or treated.

Dysfunction in multiple primary afferent fiber subtypes revealed by quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic vincristine-induced pain

Vincristine is one of the frontline chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of numerous lymphoid neoplasias. The main dose-limiting complication of vincristine is the development of painful peripheral neuropathy. Although clinical reports have appeared in the literature detailing the symptoms of vincristine neuropathy, quantitative sensory testing data that might yield insight to dysfunction in subsets of primary afferents are lacking. In this report, pain descriptors and anatomical distributions of sensory abnormalities were collected in each patient. Touch detection threshold, sharpness detection threshold, the thresholds for the detection of skin warming, heat pain, skin cooling, and the perception of cooling-induced pain were measured in patients with chronic vincristine-induced pain in each area of sensory abnormality and in skin perceived as outside the affected areas. Elevated touch detection thresholds were observed both within and outside areas affected by pain and sensory abnormality. Elevated sharpness and warm detection thresholds were noted only in areas affected by pain. These data suggest that chronic vincristine-induced pain is associated with dysfunction in Abeta, Adelta, and C caliber primary afferent fibers. Deficits in Abeta fibers appear to precede and presage deficits in the other fiber types, whereas deficits in Adelta- and C-fiber function appear to be specifically associated with the generation of pain.

The natural history of chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in a community diabetes population

AIMS

To examine the natural history of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy (CPDN).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 350 people with diabetes was performed during 1998-1999 to assess the prevalence of CPDN in the community. Fifty-six patients with CPDN were identified and were followed up an average of 5 years later.

RESULTS

From the original cohort, 12 patients had died and 14 had moved away or were unable to participate in the follow-up study. Thus 30 patients with CPDN [21 male, mean (SD) age 68.6 years (9.4), mean (SD) duration of diabetes 15.4 years (8.7)] were re-assessed. Seven (23%) had been pain free for at least 12 months and 23 continued to report neuropathic pain of similar quality and severity [total McGill Pain Questionnaire Score median (interquartile range) at follow-up 22 (16-39) vs. 20 (16-33) at baseline, P = 0.3; mean (SD) visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain over the preceding 24 h 5.3 cm (2.9) vs. 4.6 cm (2.5) at baseline, P = 0.1]. Only 65% had ever received treatment for CPDN despite 96% (22/23) reporting pain to their physician; 43.5% had received antidepressants, 17.4% anticonvulsants, 39% opiates and 30% had tried complementary therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The neuropathic pain of CPDN can resolve completely over time in a minority (23%). In those in whom painful neuropathic symptoms had persisted over 5 years, no significant improvement in pain intensity was observed. Despite the improvement in treatment modalities for chronic pain in recent years, patients with CPDN continue to be inadequately treated.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: clinical and quality-of-life issues

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is estimated to be present in 50% of people living with diabetes mellitus (DM). Comorbidities of DM, such as macrovascular and microvascular changes, also Interact with DPN and affect its course. In patients with DM, DPN Is the leading cause of foot ulcers, which in turn are a major cause of amputation in the United States. Although most patients with DPN do not have pain, approximately 11% of patients with DPN have chronic, painful symptoms that diminish quality of life, disrupt sleep, and can lead to depression. Despite the number of patients affected by DPN pain, little consensus exists about the pathophysiology, best diagnostic tools, and primary treatment choices. This article reviews the current knowledge about and presents recommendations for diagnostic assessment of DPN pain based on a review of the literature.

Zonisamide in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic neuropathy is a form of neuropathic pain frequently encountered as a complication of diabetes mellitus types I and II. Pharmacotherapy is one modality of treatment for this distressing and often disabling condition, but there is no medication available that consistently provides adequate pain relief with acceptable safety and tolerability. Tricyclic antidepressants, certain antiepileptic drugs, and opioids have been shown in randomized, controlled trials to be of benefit in painful diabetic neuropathy, although none has Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved labeling for this indication.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the safety and efficacy of zonisamide in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. This pilot study is the first randomized, controlled trial of zonisamide for the treatment of any neuropathic pain disorder.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-two patients 18-80 years of age with type I or type II diabetes mellitus and at least a 3-month history of painful diabetic neuropathy were screened in the study, and 25 were randomized to zonisamide (N = 13) or placebo (N = 12). The study drug was titrated over a 6-week period and continued at a fixed dosage for a 6-week maintenance period. The mean dosage of zonisamide for the maintenance phase was 540 mg/day.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients kept a daily log of their pain using both a 0-100 mm visual analog scale and a 0-10 Likert scale.

RESULT

Pain scores on both the visual analog scale and the Likert scale decreased more for the zonisamide group compared with the placebo group, regardless of whether the comparison was made for the intent-to-treat population, the population that entered the maintenance phase, or the completer population, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Tolerability of zonisamide was only fair in this study, which had a high number of dropouts from the zonisamide group.

CONCLUSION

A larger randomized, controlled trial is needed to establish the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide for painful diabetic neuropathy.

Representation of Somatosensory Modalities in Pathways Ascending from the Spinal Anterolateral Funiculus to the Thalamus Demonstrated by Lesions in Man

Patients with cordotomies (16), and brainstem (17) or thalamic (30) infarcts, all except cordotomies verified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been subjected to quantitative sensory perception threshold testing (QST) for touch (von Frey), mechanical pain, sharpness, innocuous warmth and cold, and heat pain in the maximally affected body area and its unaffected contralateral mirror image region. Some patients were tested twice at widely spaced time intervals; no qualitative differences were found. Results show that all modalities are dissociable from one another by lesions at all levels tested, so that there must be separable representation for each of the six modalities tested. In the lower (crossed symptoms and signs), but not the upper (uncrossed symptoms), deficits for all modalities (except for touch) were more marked than at higher levels. At the level of the thalamus, deficits for innocuous and noxious thermal modalities but not for mechanical pain were recorded in the case of lesions of the principal somatosensory relay nucleus (VPL/Vc), while more medial thalamic lesions resulted in deficits for mechanical pain but not for heat pain or innocuous thermal modalities; there is a marked deficit for sharpness caused by lesions at both thalamic sites.

Electrical spinal cord stimulation in the long-term treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy

AIMS

Electrical spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) is a technique for the management of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy (CPDN) affecting the lower limbs. We assessed the efficacy and complication rate of ESCS implanted at least 7 years previously in eight patients.

METHODS

After a trial period of percutaneous stimulation, eight male patients had been implanted with a permanent system. Mean age at implantation was 53.5 years and all patients were insulin treated with stage 3 severe disabling CPDN of at least 1 year's duration. The ESCS was removed from one patient at 4 months because of system failure and one patient died 2 months after implantation from a myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Six patients were reviewed a mean of 3.3 years post-implantation. With the stimulator off, McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ) scores (a measure of the quality and severity of pain) were similar to MPQ scores prior to ESCS insertion. Pain scores (visual analogue scale) were measured with the stimulator off and on, respectively: background pain [74.5 (63-79) mm vs. 25 (17-33) mm, median (interquartile range), P = 0.03), peak pain (85 (80-92) mm vs. 19 (11-47) mm, P = 0.03]. There were two further cardiovascular deaths (these patients had continued pain relief) and the four surviving patients were reassessed at 7.5 (range 7-8.5) years: background pain [73 (65-77) mm vs. 33 (28-36) mm, median (interquartile range)], peak pain [86 (81-94) mm vs. 42 (31-53) mm]. Late complications (> 6 months post-insertion) occurred in two patients; electrode damage secondary to trauma requiring replacement (n = 1), and skin peeling under the transmitter site (n = 1). One patient had a second electrode implanted in the cervical region which relieved typical neuropathic hand pains.

CONCLUSIONS

ESCS can continue to provide significant pain relief over a prolonged period of time with little associated morbidity.

Pregabalin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, 8-week trial (with subsequent open-label phase) evaluated the effectiveness of pregabalin in alleviating pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). For enrollment, patients must have had at baseline: 1- to 5-year history of DPN pain; pain score > or =40 mm (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] visual analogue scale); average daily pain score of > or =4 (11-point numerical pain rating scale [0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain]). One hundred forty-six (146) patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 70) or pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 76). Primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score from daily patient diaries (11-point numerical pain rating scale). Secondary measures included SF-MPQ scores; sleep interference scores; Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC); Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey scores; and Profile of Mood States (POMS) scores. Safety assessment included incidence and intensity of adverse events, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory evaluations. Pregabalin produced significant improvements versus placebo for mean pain scores (P < 0.0001); mean sleep interference scores SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.0001); total SF-MPQ score (P < 0.01); SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (P < 0.03); PGIC (P = 0.001); and Total Mood Disturbance and Tension-Anxiety components of POMS (P < 0.03). Pain relief and improved sleep began during week 1 and remained significant throughout the study (P < 0.01). Pregabalin was well tolerated despite a greater incidence of dizziness and somnolence than placebo. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and did not result in withdrawal. Pregabalin was safe and effective in decreasing pain associated with DPN, and also improved mood, sleep disturbance, and quality of life.

Cooling detection thresholds in the assessment of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy: comparison of CASE IV and Medoc instruments

OBJECTIVE

Cooling detection threshold testing may be an important quantitative method for assessing polyneuropathy, in that it has traditionally been viewed as a measure of small-fiber involvement. The present study sought to determine the agreement between two common testing devices and to determine whether these are concordant in their association with predictor variables for diabetic sensory polyneuropathy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 83 patients with diabetes (10 patients with type 1 diabetes and 73 patients with type 2 diabetes) and a wide spectrum of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy severity underwent concurrent cooling detection threshold testing using the Medoc and CASE IV instruments. Common predictor variables for diabetic sensory polyneuropathy were measured on the same day.

RESULTS

Measurements of cooling detection thresholds by both instruments were highly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.81, P < 0.001) and demonstrated a high degree of agreement by the method of Bland and Altman (95% distribution critical values for the difference in cooling detection thresholds, +7.5 and -5.6 degrees C). Cooling detection thresholds by both instruments were strongly correlated with clinical indicators of large-fiber neuropathy but not with the symptoms of small-fiber neuropathy (pain).

CONCLUSIONS

These two instruments available for assessment of cooling detection thresholds are interchangeable for research in diabetic sensory polyneuropathy. However, this modality is equivalent to other modalities of quantitative sensory threshold testing in its association with indicators of large-fiber neuropathy and does not seem to provide an advantage for the prediction of small-fiber involvement.

Antihyperalgesic effects of cizolirtine in diabetic rats: behavioral and biochemical studies

Although clinically well controlled at the metabolic level, type I diabetes resulting from an insufficient insulin secretion remains the cause of severe complications. In particular, diabetes can be associated with neuropathic pain which fails to be treated by classical analgesics. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of a novel non opioid analgesic, cizolirtine, to reduce mechanical hyperalgesia associated with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes, in the rat. Cizolirtine was compared to paroxetine, an antidepressant drug with proven efficacy to relieve painful diabetic neuropathy. Under acute conditions, cizolirtine (30 and 80 mg/kgi.p.) significantly increased paw withdrawal and vocalization thresholds in the paw pressure test in diabetic rats displaying mechanical hyperalgesia. The antihyperalgesic effects of cizolirtine persisted under chronic treatment conditions, since pre-diabetes thresholds were recovered after a two week-treatment with the drug (3 mg/kg/day, s.c.). In this respect, cizolirtine was as efficient as paroxetine (5 mg/kg per day, s.c.) which, however, was inactive under acute treatment conditions. Measurements of the spinal release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) through intrathecal perfusion under halothane-anesthesia showed that acute administration of cizolirtine (80 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly diminished (-36%) the peptide outflow in diabetic rats suffering from neuropathic pain. This effect as well as the antihyperalgesic effect of cizolirtine were prevented by the alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor antagonist idazoxan (2 mg/kg, i.p.). These data suggest that the antihyperalgesic effect of cizolirtine in diabetic rats suffering from neuropathic pain implies an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-dependent presynaptic inhibition of CGRP-containing primary afferent fibers.