1
|
Fénélon-Dimanche R, Guénette L, Trudel-Bourgault F, Yousif A, Lalonde G, Beauchesne MF, Collin J, Blais L. Development of an electronic tool (e-AdPharm) to address unmet needs and barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to patients. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 17:506-513. [PMID: 32402728 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacists are best placed to improve medication adherence because they frequently interact with patients and have been trained to manage medication-related problems. Therefore, it is essential to equip pharmacists adequately to detect non-adherent patients quickly and intervene to improve medication adherence. OBJECTIVE To design e-AdPharm, a tool that addresses unmet needs and barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to patients with chronic diseases. METHODS A qualitative study using 4 focus group discussions with community pharmacists was conducted with a semi-structured interview guide and discussions lasting for 1-2 h. The discussions covered the barriers and needs of pharmacists related to medication adherence support provided to patients, their expectations of an electronic tool based on prescription refills to help them provide this support, and the design of the tool. Focus group data were coded and analyzed using an iterative process, with thematic and descriptive analyses. RESULTS Twenty-six community pharmacists participated. Lack of time and motivation from pharmacists and patients were common barriers to the provision of medication adherence support. Accordingly, community pharmacists wished to measure medication adherence quickly, provide easily interpretable data to patients on their medication use, and raise the patient's awareness of non-adherence. The pharmacists expressed their need to have an electronic tool to share medication adherence information with the treating physician. Regarding the design of e-AdPharm, the pharmacists wanted a table displaying medication adherence with a color code representing adherence level. They also stressed the importance of a structured section enabling them to continuously document the interventions made and the need for patient follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS e-AdPharm meet the needs and overcome the barriers of community pharmacists to provide medication adherence support to their patients. Future studies should examine the feasibility of implementing e-AdPharm in community pharmacies and test its efficacy for improving medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rébecca Fénélon-Dimanche
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Line Guénette
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec Research Centre, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec, Québec, Canada.
| | | | - Alia Yousif
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Geneviève Lalonde
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Marie-France Beauchesne
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
| | - Johanne Collin
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Lucie Blais
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Endowment Pharmaceutical Chair AstraZeneca in Respiratory Health, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fénélon-Dimanche R, Guénette L, Yousif A, Lalonde G, Beauchesne MF, Collin J, Blais L. Monitoring and managing medication adherence in community pharmacies in Quebec, Canada. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020; 153:108-121. [PMID: 32206156 DOI: 10.1177/1715163520902494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Community pharmacists have direct access to prescription refill information and regularly interact with their patients. Therefore, they are in a unique position to promote optimal medication use. Objectives To describe how community pharmacists in Quebec, Canada, identify nonadherent patients, monitor medication use and promote optimal medication adherence. Methods An invitation to complete a web-based survey was published online through different platforms, including a Facebook pharmacists' group, an electronic newsletter, a pharmacy network forum and e-mail. The survey included questions on participant characteristics, methods used by pharmacists to identify nonadherent patients and monitor medication use and interventions they used to promote medication adherence. Results In total, 342 community pharmacists completed the survey. The participants were mainly women (71.6%), staff pharmacists (56.7%) and aged 30 to 39 years (34.2%). The most common method to identify nonadherent patients was to check gaps between prescription refills (98.8%). The most common intervention to promote adherence was patient counselling (82.5%). The most common barriers to identifying nonadherent patients were lack of time (73.1%) and lack of prescription information (65.8%), whereas the most common barriers to intervening were anticipation of a negative reaction from their patients (91.2%) and lack of time (64%). Conclusion Lack of time and lack of prescription information are frequent challenges encountered by community pharmacists regarding effective monitoring and management of patients with poor medication adherence. Pharmacists could benefit from electronic tools based on prescription refills that would provide quick and easily interpretable information on their patients' medication adherence. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rébecca Fénélon-Dimanche
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Line Guénette
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Alia Yousif
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Geneviève Lalonde
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Marie-France Beauchesne
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Johanne Collin
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| | - Lucie Blais
- Faculty of Pharmacy (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal
- Research Centre, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île de Montréal (Fénélon-Dimanche, Yousif, Lalonde, Beauchesne, Collin, Blais), Montréal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval (Guénette), Québec
- CHU de Québec Research Centre (Guénette), Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Québec
- Research Centre, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (Beauchesne), Sherbrooke, Québec
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alsayed KA, Ghoraba MK. Assessment of diabetic patients' adherence to insulin injections on basal-bolus regimen in diabetic care center in Saudi Arabia 2018: Cross sectional survey. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8:1964-1970. [PMID: 31334163 PMCID: PMC6618221 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_276_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Since insulin became a focal point of diabetes management, several studies have been carried out to monitor and improve patient outcomes. Adherence insulin therapy is an important part of diabetes management. Aim: This study reviews the responses of patients being managed in a diabetic care setting in monitoring their adherence to basal bolus insulin therapy. Method: A pre-validated questionnaire containing 18 questions was administered to patients in the diabetic care unit of the Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: The levels of adherence with basal bolus insulin therapy was 61.9%. There is no considerable difference in adherence levels of male and female respondents with 31.62% and 31.58% respectively. The younger age groups (14-29) had the highest adherence levels at 65.75%. Higher levels of patient literacy and the location also have a positive relationship with adherence. Conclusion: To improve adherence levels, dosing should be made with consideration for patient convenience, and patients should be encouraged to build positive psychological relationships. Further studies should look to studying outcomes of therapy, and markers should be developed to monitor patient progress on therapy regimen regularly. The aspect of short clinic visits is another major consideration that needs to be look into properly to understand and monitor patients’ proper adherence toward the basal bolus insulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid A Alsayed
- Family Medicine Resident, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long H, Bartlett YK, Farmer AJ, French DP. Identifying Brief Message Content for Interventions Delivered via Mobile Devices to Improve Medication Adherence in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Rapid Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e10421. [PMID: 30626562 PMCID: PMC6329430 DOI: 10.2196/10421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Current interventions to support medication adherence in people with type 2 diabetes are generally resource-intensive and ineffective. Brief messages, such as those delivered via short message service (SMS) systems, are increasingly used in digital health interventions to support adherence because they can be delivered on a wide scale and at low cost. The content of SMS text messages is a crucial intervention feature for promoting behavior change, but it is often unclear what the rationale is for chosen wording or any underlying mechanisms targeted for behavioral change. There is little guidance for developing and optimizing brief message content for use in mobile device–delivered interventions. Objective This review aimed to (1) identify theoretical constructs (ie, the targets that interventions aim to change) and behavioral strategies (ie, features of intervention content) found to be associated with medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes and (2) map these onto a standard taxonomy for behavior change techniques (BCTs, that is, active ingredients of interventions used to promote behavioral change, to produce an evidence-based set of approaches that have shown promise of improving adherence in previous studies and which could be further tested in digital health interventions. Methods A rapid systematic review of existing relevant systematic reviews was conducted. MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to April 10, 2017. Inclusion criteria were (1) systematic reviews of quantitative data if the studies reviewed identified predictors of or correlates with medication adherence or evaluated medication adherence–enhancing interventions and included adult participants taking medication to manage a chronic physical health condition, and (2) systematic reviews of qualitative studies of experiences of medication adherence for adult participants with type 2 diabetes. Data were extracted on review characteristics and BCTs, theoretical constructs, or behavioral strategies associated with improved adherence. Constructs and strategies were mapped onto the BCT version 1 taxonomy. Results A total of 1701 references were identified; 25 systematic reviews (19 quantitative reviews, 3 qualitative reviews, and 3 mixed-method reviews) were included. Moreover, 20 theoretical constructs (eg, self-efficacy) and 19 behavioral strategies (eg, habit analysis) were identified in the included reviews. In total, 46 BCTs were identified as being related to medication adherence in type 2 diabetes (eg, habit formation, prompts or cues, and information about health consequences). Conclusions We identified 46 promising BCTs related to medication adherence in type 2 diabetes on which the content of brief messages delivered through mobile devices to improve adherence could be based. By using explicit systematic review methods and linking our findings to a standardized taxonomy of BCTs, we have described a novel approach for the development of digital message content. Future brief message interventions that aim to support medication adherence could incorporate the identified BCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Long
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yvonne K Bartlett
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Farmer
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doggrell SA. A review of interventions ≥ 6 months by pharmacists on adherence to medicines in cardiovascular disease: Characteristics of what works and what doesn't. Res Social Adm Pharm 2018; 15:119-129. [PMID: 29656935 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonadherence to cardiovascular medicines occurs in 60% of subjects with chronic cardiovascular disease and leads to poor outcomes. In an attempt to improve adherence and cardiovascular outcomes, interventions are often used. Interventions may involve a pharmacist, but it is not always clear whether these are effective. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review is to determine whether interventions by pharmacists, alone, discussing adherence to medicines, improve adherence to medicines for cardiovascular disease. Subsequently, the review links the characteristics of the individual studies with effectiveness or lack of effect. The second objective of this review is to consider whether any improvement in adherence with interventions by pharmacist is associated with better clinical outcomes. METHODS A literature search of PubMed and CINAHL for 'pharmacist', 'medicine' with 'adherence' or 'compliance' or 'persistence' was undertaken. To be included in this review, papers had to be of a pharmacist working alone and in person in an intervention of subjects with hypertension, hyperlipidemia (prior to or after a coronary artery event) or heart failure. The paper had to be published in a peer review journal, with a measure of adherence to medicines. The effectiveness of the intervention had to be evaluated after ≥6 months. RESULTS Only 3 out of 8 interventions by pharmacists in hypertension, and 5 out of 12 interventions in subjects with hyperlipidemia led to improved adherence to medicines. In contrast, all 6 interventions by a pharmacist in subjects with heart failure were successful in improving adherence. One characteristic of successful interventions by pharmacists to improve adherence to cardiovascular medicines is that they must be more than brief/single interventions. A second characteristic is that the intervention should not involve subjects who are already highly adherent, as it is unlikely adherence can be improved in this population. Only 2 of 3 successful interventions in hypertension were associated with small reductions in blood pressure, and only one intervention in hyperlipidemia was shown to decrease LDL-cholesterol to a small extent. In subjects with heart failure, 5 of the 6 successful studies of the successful interventions by pharmacists to increase adherence also showed improved clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS When planning an intervention to improve adherence to medicines and cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with hypertension or hyperlipidemic, by a pharmacist alone, or as part of a multi-faceted interventions, it is essential to use an intervention that has been shown to be effective, as most interventions are not effective at improving adherence or only improve adherence and clinical outcomes to a small extent. In heart failure, there is well documented evidence of interventions by pharmacists that do improve clinical outcomes, which should be adopted widely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Anne Doggrell
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, GPO 2343, QLD, 4002, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farmer AJ, McSharry J, Rowbotham S, McGowan L, Ricci-Cabello I, French DP. Effects of interventions promoting monitoring of medication use and brief messaging on medication adherence for people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized trials. Diabet Med 2016; 33:565-79. [PMID: 26470750 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To assess the impact of interventions promoting the monitoring of medication use and brief messaging to support medication adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to investigate the extent of theory use to guide intervention development. METHODS We systematically searched for controlled trials, published from 1990 onwards in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane library, that evaluated interventions based on monitoring and brief messaging to support medication adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes, to examine the effectiveness of such interventions. RESULTS A total of 11 trials, comparing 15 interventions, were identified. Only a small minority presented a low risk of bias. Three interventions were based on delivering brief messages, six were based on monitoring medication adherence, and six used both strategies. Messaging interventions included the use of short message service text messages, web-based feedback, and messages delivered through monitoring devices. Monitoring interventions included remote self-reporting of medication and telephone calls with healthcare staff. Improvements in medication adherence were observed in six interventions, although effect sizes were generally moderate. Only two interventions improved both adherence and clinical outcomes. A meta-analysis of five trials (eight interventions) combining monitoring and messaging strategies showed that the pooled difference in medication adherence between intervention and control was moderate and not statistically significant [standardized mean difference = 0.22 (95% CI -0.05; 0.49)]. Only four trials were based on explicit theoretical frameworks. CONCLUSIONS Although interventions based on messaging and monitoring have the potential to improve medication adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes, evidence of their efficacy is limited and additional high-quality, theory-based research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Farmer
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J McSharry
- National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - L McGowan
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - I Ricci-Cabello
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D P French
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Systematic Review of Interventions Addressing Adherence to Anti-Diabetic Medications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes--Components of Interventions. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0128581. [PMID: 26053004 PMCID: PMC4460122 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Poor adherence to anti-diabetic medications contributes to suboptimal glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A range of interventions have been developed to promote anti-diabetic medication adherence. However, there has been very little focus on the characteristics of these interventions and how effectively they address factors that predict non-adherence. In this systematic review we assessed the characteristics of interventions that aimed to promote adherence to anti-diabetic medications. Method Using appropriate search terms in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PUBmed, and PsychINFO (years 2000–2013), we identified 52 studies which met the inclusion criteria. Results Forty-nine studies consisted of patient-level interventions, two provider-level interventions, and one consisted of both. Interventions were classified as educational (n = 7), behavioural (n = 3), affective, economic (n = 3) or multifaceted (a combination of the above; n = 40). One study consisted of two interventions. The review found that multifaceted interventions, addressing several non-adherence factors, were comparatively more effective in improving medication adherence and glycaemic target in patients with T2D than single strategies. However, interventions with similar components and those addressing similar non-adherence factors demonstrated mixed results, making it difficult to conclude on effective intervention strategies to promote adherence. Educational strategies have remained the most popular intervention strategy, followed by behavioural, with affective components becoming more common in recent years. Most of the interventions addressed patient-related (n = 35), condition-related (n = 31), and therapy-related (n = 20) factors as defined by the World Health Organization, while fewer addressed health care system (n = 5) and socio-economic-related factors (n = 13). Conclusion There is a noticeable shift in the literature from using single to multifaceted intervention strategies addressing a range of factors impacting adherence to medications. However, research limitations, such as limited use of standardized methods and tools to measure adherence, lack of individually tailored adherence promoting strategies and variability in the interventions developed, reduce the ability to generalize the findings of the studies reviewed. Furthermore, this review highlights the need to develop multifaceted interventions which can be tailored to the individual patient’s needs over the duration of their diabetes management.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vignon Zomahoun HT, de Bruin M, Guillaumie L, Moisan J, Grégoire JP, Pérez N, Vézina-Im LA, Guénette L. Effectiveness and Content Analysis of Interventions to Enhance Oral Antidiabetic Drug Adherence in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2015; 18:530-540. [PMID: 26091607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Revised: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/08/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the pooled effect size of oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) adherence-enhancing interventions and to explore which of the behavior change techniques (BCTs) applied in the intervention groups modified this pooled intervention effect size. METHODS We searched relevant studies published until September 3, 2013, on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Current Contents Connect, and Web of Science. Selected studies were qualitatively synthesized, and those of at least medium quality were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used to pool effectiveness (Hedges's g) and to examine heterogeneity (Higgins I(2)). We also explored the influence on the pooled effectiveness of unique intervention BCTs (those delivered to the intervention groups but not control groups in a trial) by estimating their modifying effects. RESULTS Fourteen studies were selected for the qualitative synthesis and 10 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effectiveness of the interventions was 0.21 (95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.47; I(2) = 82%). Eight unique BCTs were analyzed. "Cope with side effects" (P = 0.003) and "general intention formation" (P = 0.006) had a modifying effect on the pooled effectiveness. The pooled effectiveness of the interventions in which "cope with side effects" was applied was moderate (0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.96; I(2) = 56%). CONCLUSIONS The overall effectiveness of OAD adherence-enhancing interventions that have been tested is small. Helping patients cope with side effects or formulate desired treatment outcomes could have an impact on the effectiveness of OAD adherence-enhancing interventions. Only those interventions that include helping patients to cope with side effects appear to be particularly effective in improving OAD adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Marijn de Bruin
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Scotland
| | - Laurence Guillaumie
- CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Jocelyne Moisan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Grégoire
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Norma Pérez
- CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im
- CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Line Guénette
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec Research Center Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit and Chair on adherence to treatments, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sapkota S, Brien JA, Greenfield J, Aslani P. A systematic review of interventions addressing adherence to anti-diabetic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes--impact on adherence. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118296. [PMID: 25710465 PMCID: PMC4339210 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2014] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The global prevalence of diabetes is increasing. Medications are a recommended strategy to control hyperglycaemia. However, patient adherence can be variable, impacting health outcomes. A range of interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes have focused on improving treatment adherence. This review evaluates the impact of these interventions on adherence to anti-diabetic medications and focuses on the methods and tools used to measure adherence. Method Medline, Embase, CINAHL, IPA, PUBmed, and PsychINFO were searched for relevant articles published in 2000–2013, using appropriate search terms. Results Fifty two studies addressing adherence to anti-diabetic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Each study was assessed for research design, method(s) used for measuring medication adherence, and impact of intervention on medication adherence and glycaemic control. Fourteen studies were published in 2000–2009 and 38 in 2010–2013. Twenty two interventions led to improvements in adherence to anti-diabetic medications, while only nine improved both medication adherence and glycaemic control. A single strategy could not be identified which would be guaranteed to improve anti-diabetic medication adherence consistently. Nonetheless, most interventions were successful in influencing one or more of the outcomes assessed, indicating the usefulness of these interventions under certain circumstances. Self-report, particularly the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities questionnaire was the most commonly used tool to assess medication adherence, although other self-report tools were used in more recent studies. Overall, there was a slight increase in the number of studies that employed multiple methods to assess medication adherence in studies conducted after 2008. Conclusion The diversity of interventions and adherence measurements prevented a meta-analysis of the impact of interventions on adherence to therapy, highlighting the need for more consistency in methods in the area of adherence research. Whilst effective interventions were identified, it is not possible to conclude on an effective intervention that can be generalised to all patients with type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujata Sapkota
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jo-anne Brien
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jerry Greenfield
- Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincent Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Parisa Aslani
- Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saffari M, Ghanizadeh G, Koenig HG. Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes 2014; 8:275-285. [PMID: 24793589 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2014] [Revised: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes type 2 is an increasing problem worldwide that may be managed through education. Text-messaging using a cell phone can assist with self-care. The aim of this study was to systematically review the impact of education through mobile text-messaging on glycemic control. METHODS The design was a systematic review with meta-analysis. Five electronic databases were searched to access English studies involving a randomized controlled trial design that used text-messaging educational interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes during an 11-year period (2003-2013). Studies were evaluated using a quality assessment scale adapted from Jadad scale and Cochrane handbook. Extraction of data was carried out by two reviewers. A random-effect model with a standardized mean difference and Hedges's g indices was used for conducting the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted and a Funnel plot was used to examine publication bias. RESULTS Ten studies overall were identified that fulfilled inclusion criteria, involving a total of 960 participants. The mean age of the sample was 52.8 years and majority were females. Data were heterogeneous (I(2)=67.6). Analyses suggested a publication bias based on Egger's regression (P<0.05). HbA1c was reduced significantly in experimental groups compared to control groups (P<0.001). The effect size for glycemic control in studies that used text-messaging only was 44%. For studies that used both text-messaging and Internet, the effect size was 86%. CONCLUSION Mobile text-messaging for educating Type 2 diabetics appears to be effective on glycemic control. Further investigations on mobile applications to achieve educational goals involving other diseases are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Saffari
- Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Health Education Department, School of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Ghader Ghanizadeh
- Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Harold G Koenig
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
García-Pérez LE, Alvarez M, Dilla T, Gil-Guillén V, Orozco-Beltrán D. Adherence to therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2013; 4:175-94. [PMID: 23990497 PMCID: PMC3889324 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-013-0034-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 424] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Adherence to therapy is defined as the extent to which a person's behavior in taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider. Patients presenting with type 2 diabetes mellitus are initially encouraged to maintain a healthy diet and exercise regimen, followed by early medication that generally includes one or more oral hypoglycemic agents and later may include an injectable treatment. To prevent the complications associated with type 2 diabetes, therapy frequently also includes medications for control of blood pressure, dyslipidemia and other disorders, since patients often have more than three or four chronic conditions. Despite the benefits of therapy, studies have indicated that recommended glycemic goals are achieved by less than 50% of patients, which may be associated with decreased adherence to therapies. As a result, hyperglycemia and long-term complications increase morbidity and premature mortality, and lead to increased costs to health services. Reasons for nonadherence are multifactorial and difficult to identify. They include age, information, perception and duration of disease, complexity of dosing regimen, polytherapy, psychological factors, safety, tolerability and cost. Various measures to increase patient satisfaction and increase adherence in type 2 diabetes have been investigated. These include reducing the complexity of therapy by fixed-dose combination pills and less frequent dosing regimens, using medications that are associated with fewer adverse events (hypoglycemia or weight gain), educational initiatives with improved patient-healthcare provider communication, reminder systems and social support to help reduce costs. In the current narrative review, factors that influence adherence to different therapies for type 2 diabetes are discussed, along with outcomes of poor adherence, the economic impact of nonadherence, and strategies aimed at improving adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis-Emilio García-Pérez
- Global Medical Affairs, Medical Department, Lilly, S.A., Avda. de la Industria 30, 28108, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|