Chapman S, Schofield WN. Lifesavers and Samaritans: emergency use of cellular (mobile) phones in Australia.
ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 1998;
30:815-819. [PMID:
9805524 DOI:
10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00034-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There has been highly publicised concern about possible radiation health effects from mobile phones and towers, but scant attention has been paid to the use of mobile phones in reducing notification times in emergencies.
METHOD
National random telephone survey of Australian mobile phone users (n = 720) and extrapolation to national user population (n = 5.1 million).
FINDINGS
Using a cellular phone, 1 in 8 users have reported a traffic accident; 1 in 4 a dangerous situation; 1 in 16 a non-road medical emergency; 1 in 20 a crime; and 1 in 45 being lost in the bush or being in difficulty at sea.
INTERPRETATION
Any debate about the net health impact of mobile phone proliferation must balance possible negative effects (cancer, driving incidents) with the benefits from what appears to be their widespread use in rapidly reporting emergencies and in numerous acts of often health-relevant 'cellular Samaritanism'.
Collapse