School immunisation certificates--a review over time in a disadvantaged community

Effectiveness and acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing uptake of vaccinations in preschool children: systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND

Uptake of preschool vaccinations is less than optimal. Financial incentives and quasi-mandatory policies (restricting access to child care or educational settings to fully vaccinated children) have been used to increase uptake internationally, but not in the UK.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence on the effectiveness, acceptability and economic costs and consequences of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing the uptake of preschool vaccinations.

DESIGN

Systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment (DCE) with questionnaire.

SETTING

Community, health and education settings in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Qualitative study - parents and carers of preschool children, health and educational professionals. DCE - parents and carers of preschool children identified as 'at high risk' and 'not at high risk' of incompletely vaccinating their children.

DATA SOURCES

Qualitative study - focus groups and individual interviews. DCE - online questionnaire.

REVIEW METHODS

The review included studies exploring the effectiveness, acceptability or economic costs and consequences of interventions that offered contingent rewards or penalties with real material value for preschool vaccinations, or quasi-mandatory schemes that restricted access to 'universal' services, compared with usual care or no intervention. Electronic database, reference and citation searches were conducted.

RESULTS

Systematic review - there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the interventions considered are effective. There was some evidence that the quasi-mandatory interventions were acceptable. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on economic costs and consequences. Qualitative study - there was little appetite for parental financial incentives. Quasi-mandatory schemes were more acceptable. Optimising current services was consistently preferred to the interventions proposed. DCE and questionnaire - universal parental financial incentives were preferred to quasi-mandatory interventions, which were preferred to targeted incentives. Those reporting that they would need an incentive to vaccinate their children completely required around £110. Those who did not felt that the maximum acceptable incentive was around £70.

LIMITATIONS

Systematic review - a number of relevant studies were excluded as they did not meet the study design inclusion criteria. Qualitative study - few partially and non-vaccinating parents were recruited. DCE and questionnaire - data were from a convenience sample.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little current evidence on the effectiveness or economic costs and consequences of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations. Universal incentives are likely to be more acceptable than targeted ones. Preferences concerning incentives versus quasi-mandatory interventions may depend on the context in which these are elicited.

FUTURE WORK

Further evidence is required on (i) the effectiveness and optimal configuration of parental financial incentive and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations - if effectiveness is confirmed, further evidence is required on how to communicate this to stakeholders and the impact on acceptability; and (ii) the acceptability of parental financial incentive and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations to members of the population who are not parents of preschool children or relevant health professionals. Further consideration should be given to (i) incorporating reasons for non-vaccination into new interventions for promoting vaccination uptake; and (ii) how existing services can be optimised.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012003192.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Validity of measles immunization certificates submitted upon enrollment in an elementary school in Korea

OBJECTIVES

To increase the booster vaccination rate, the Korean government legislated a measles vaccination for elementary school students in 2001, requiring parents to submit a certificate of vaccination upon the admission of the students to elementary school. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of measles vaccination certificates which were issued to parents.

METHODS

Using questionnaire survey data of 890 general practitioners and 9,235 parents in 2005, we investigated the evidence for booster vaccination certificates of measles.

RESULTS

In the survey of general practitioners, 59.5% of the certificates depended on the medical records of clinic, 13.5% was immunization booklets, 23.7% was re-immunizations, 1.9% was confirmation of record of other clinics, and 1.4% was parents' statements or requests without evidence. In the survey of parents, 36.2% of the certificates depended on the medical records of clinic, 43.4% was immunization booklets, 18.0% was reimmunizations, and 2.4% was parents statements or requests without evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that a majority of the booster vaccination certificates of measles was issued on the basis of documented vaccinations and it means that the implementation of the law requiring the submission of elementary school students' vaccination certificates has been very successful in Korea.

A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs)

Patients, policymakers, providers, payers, employers, and others have increasing interest in using personal health records (PHRs) to improve healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency. While organizations now invest millions of dollars in PHRs, the best PHR architectures, value propositions, and descriptions are not universally agreed upon. Despite widespread interest and activity, little PHR research has been done to date, and targeted research investment in PHRs appears inadequate. The authors reviewed the existing PHR specific literature (100 articles) and divided the articles into seven categories, of which four in particular--evaluation of PHR functions, adoption and attitudes of healthcare providers and patients towards PHRs, PHR related privacy and security, and PHR architecture--present important research opportunities. We also briefly discuss other research related to PHRs, PHR research funding sources, and PHR business models. We believe that additional PHR research can increase the likelihood that future PHR system deployments will beneficially impact healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency.

Measles vaccination coverage among five-year-old children: implications for disease elimination in Australia

OBJECTIVES

To (i) assess under-reporting of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations to the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR); (ii) estimate MMR coverage among five-year-old children and the proportion immune to measles infection; (iii) identify factors related to non-uptake of MMR vaccination.

METHODS

We analysed ACIR data for a birth cohort of approximately 64,000 children aged five years. The parents of a sample of 506 children with no ACIR record for the second MMR vaccination (MMR2), due at four years of age, were interviewed by telephone to assess under-reporting to the ACIR and reasons for non-uptake of MMR vaccination.

RESULTS

Parents reported that 22% (n = 111) of the surveyed 506 children had received MMR2 before their fifth birthday, and 42% (n = 214) by approximately 5.5 years of age. After correcting for this level of under-reporting to the ACIR, MMR2 coverage for the entire cohort at five years of age was 52.9% (95% CI 52.3-53.4), and increased to 84.1% (95% CI 83.4-84.8) by approximately 5.5 years of age. This was 4.3% and 8.2%, respectively, higher than ACIR coverage estimates at the two ages. Based on the corrected MMR coverage estimates, 93% of the cohort was immune to measles due to vaccination. The most common parent-reported reason for incomplete vaccination was lack of knowledge about the MMR vaccination schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Measles elimination in Australia will require continued effort in vaccination coverage and timeliness among pre-school children. School-entry requirements are important for MMR2 uptake. Strategies are needed to improve reporting to the ACIR for more accurate measurement of coverage.