1
|
Gustafsson PE, Fonseca-Rodríguez O, San Sebastián M, Burström B, Mosquera PA. Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:972. [PMID: 39174988 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11434-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Swedish Primary Health Care (PHC) system has, like in other European countries, undergone a gradual transition towards marketization and privatization, most distinctly through a 2010 choice reform. The reform led to an overall but regionally heterogenous expansion of private PHC providers in Sweden, and with evidence also pointing to possible inequities in various aspects of PHC provision. Evidence on the reform's impact on population-level primary health care performance and equity in performance remains scarce. The present study therefore aimed to examine whether the increase in private provision after the reform impacted on population-average rates of avoidable hospitalizations, as well as on corresponding socioeconomic inequities. METHODS This register-based study used a multiple-group interrupted time-series design for the study period 2001-2017, with the study population (N = 51 million observations) randomly drawn from the total Swedish population aged 18-85 years. High, medium, and low implementing comparison groups were classified by tertiles of increase in private PHC providers after the reform. PHC performance was measured by avoidable hospitalizations, and socioeconomic position by education and income. Interrupted time series analysis based on individual-level data was used to estimate the reform impact on avoidable hospitalization risk, and on inequities through the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). RESULTS All three comparisons groups displayed decreasing risk of avoidable hospitalizations but increasing socioeconomic inequities across the study period. Compared to regions with little change in provision after the reform, regions with large increase in private provision saw a steeper decrease in avoidable hospitalizations after the reform (relative risk (95%): 1.6% (1.1; 2.1)), but at the same time steeper increase in inequities (by education: 2.0% (0.1%; 4.0); by income: 2.2% (-0.1; 4.3)). CONCLUSIONS The study suggests that the increase in private health care centers, enabled by the choice reform, contributed to a small improvement when it comes to overall PHC performance, but simultaneously to increased socioeconomic inequities in PHC performance. This duality in the impact of the Swedish reform also reflects the arguments in the European health policy debate on patient choice PHC models, with hopes of improved performance but fears of increased inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per E Gustafsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.
| | | | - Miguel San Sebastián
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Bo Burström
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paola A Mosquera
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Footman K. The illusion of treatment choice in abortion care: A qualitative study of comparative care experiences in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med 2024; 348:116873. [PMID: 38615614 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Treatment choice is a key component of quality, person-centred care, but policies promoting choice often ignore how capacity to choose is unequally distributed and influenced by social structures. In abortion care, the choice of either medication or a procedure is limited in many countries, but the structuring of treatment choice from the perspective of people accessing abortion care is poorly understood. This qualitative study explored comparative experiences of abortion treatment choice in England and Wales, using in-depth interviews with 32 people who recently accessed abortion care and had one or more prior abortions. A codebook approach was used to analyse the data, informed by a multidisciplinary framework for understanding the relationship between choice and equity. Abortion treatment choice was structured by multiple intersecting mechanisms: limitations on the supply of abortion care, incomplete or unbalanced information from providers, and participants' socio-economic environments. Long waiting times or travel distances could reduce choice of both treatment options. In interactions with providers, participants described not being offered procedural abortions or receiving information that favoured medication abortion. Participants' socio-economic environments impacted the way they navigated decision-making and their ability to manage the experience of either treatment option. Individual preferences for care were shaped in part by the interplay between these structural barriers, creating an illusion of choice, as the health system bias towards medication abortion reinforced some participants' negative perceptions of procedural abortion. The erosion of choice, to the point it is rendered illusory, has unequal impacts on quality of care. People's needs for their abortion care are complex and diverse, and access to varied service models is required to meet these needs. Treatment choice could be expanded by integrating public and private non-profit sector provision, aligning time limits and workforce requirements for abortion care with international standards, addressing financial pressures on service delivery, and revising the language used to depict each treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katy Footman
- Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kesici Z, Yilmaz V. Insurance-based disparities in breast cancer treatment pathways in a universal healthcare system: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:112. [PMID: 36732811 PMCID: PMC9894738 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of healthcare system factors on treatment pathways for breast cancer has been studied extensively in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), but in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), this area is understudied. This article focuses on the experiences of breast cancer patients in Türkiye, a UMIC with a universal healthcare system. It explores variations in treatment pathways based on the type of health insurance provider (private or state). METHODS The study uses an exploratory qualitative method based on in-depth interviews with 12 breast cancer patients. The inclusion criteria were Turkish nationality, female gender, and having received treatment from a private hospital within one year of the interview. A purposeful sampling strategy was employed to recruit patients who had either social health insurance only or who had private health insurance in addition to their social health insurance. A two-stage thematic analysis of the interview data was conducted. First, we examined whether the type of insurance provider makes a difference in treatment pathways; we then identified healthcare system factors that explain these differences. RESULTS The study revealed two distinct pathways to treatment. These differ in terms of financial protection, service coverage, and patients' sense of equity. Patients with private insurance reported easy access to timely and comprehensive treatment. Those without, however, had to navigate complicated routes to treatment; they generally had to resort to seeking treatment from more than one hospital. We found two healthcare system factors that explained the differences: a failure to fully enforce the mandates of the state's social health insurance in the private hospital sector and growing reliance on private insurance to gain access to essential services. CONCLUSIONS Based on data from the Turkish case, we conclude that healthcare system factors are indeed influential in shaping treatment pathways for breast cancer in UMICs with universal healthcare. These factors include a failure to fully enforce the mandates of the state's social health insurance programme in the private hospital sector and a growing reliance on private insurance to gain access to essential services. We note that this contrasts dramatically with the situation in LMICs, where the main factors are low-quality care and shortages of medical staff, medicines, and technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Kesici
- grid.11220.300000 0001 2253 9056Social Policy Forum Research Centre, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Volkan Yilmaz
- grid.15596.3e0000000102380260School of Law and Government, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perrotta M, Hamper J. Patient informed choice in the age of evidence-based medicine: IVF patients' approaches to biomedical evidence and fertility treatment add-ons. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:225-241. [PMID: 36369731 PMCID: PMC10100272 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
With the increasing offer of fertility treatment by a largely privatised sector, which has involved the proliferation of treatment add-ons lacking evidence of effectiveness, In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) patients are expected to make informed choices on what to include in their treatment. Drawing on interviews with 51 individuals undergoing fertility treatment, this article explores patients' approaches to medical evidence interpretation and its role in their decisions to include add-ons. While most IVF patients share understandings of what counts as medical evidence, our findings show how their approaches also differ. Our analysis focuses on how patients negotiate the notion of medical evidence and its relation to other forms of experience or knowledge. We present four different approaches to evidence in IVF: (1) delegating evaluations of evidence to experts; (2) critically assessing available evidence; (3) acknowledging the process of making evidence; and (4) contextualising evidence in their lived experience of infertility. We suggest that patients' choice to include add-ons is not due to a lack of information on or understanding of evidence, but rather should be interpreted as part of the complexity of patients' experiences of infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Perrotta
- Department of People and OrganisationsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Josie Hamper
- Department of People and OrganisationsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pavithra A, Mannion R, Sunderland N, Westbrook J. Speaking up as an extension of socio-cultural dynamics in hospital settings: a study of staff experiences of speaking up across seven hospitals. J Health Organ Manag 2022; ahead-of-print:245-271. [PMID: 36380424 PMCID: PMC10424643 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-04-2022-0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to understand the significance of how employee personhood and the act of speaking up is shaped by factors such as employees' professional status, length of employment within their hospital sites, age, gender and their ongoing exposure to unprofessional behaviours. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Responses to a survey by 4,851 staff across seven sites within a hospital network in Australia were analysed to interrogate whether speaking up by hospital employees is influenced by employees' symbolic capital and situated subjecthood (SS). The authors utilised a Bourdieusian lens to interrogate the relationship between the symbolic capital afforded to employees as a function of their professional, personal and psycho-social resources and their self-reported capacity to speak up. FINDINGS The findings indicate that employee speaking up behaviours appear to be influenced profoundly by whether they feel empowered or disempowered by ongoing and pre-existing personal and interpersonal factors such as their functional roles, work-based peer and supervisory support and ongoing exposure to discriminatory behaviours. ORIGINALITY/VALUE The findings from this interdisciplinary study provide empirical insights around why culture change interventions within healthcare organisations may be successful in certain contexts for certain staff groups and fail within others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Pavithra
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research
,
Australian Institute of Health Innovation
, Sydney,
Australia
| | - Russell Mannion
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation
, Sydney,
Australia
- Health Services Management Centre
,
University of Birmingham
, Birmingham,
UK
| | - Neroli Sunderland
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research
,
Australian Institute of Health Innovation
, Sydney,
Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research
,
Australian Institute of Health Innovation
, Sydney,
Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choińska AK, Maślach D. Selected aspect of Pierre Bourdieu's "Praxis" in the area of decision-making about therapy and medical care. PRZEGLAD EPIDEMIOLOGICZNY 2022; 76:314-329. [PMID: 36520065 DOI: 10.32394/pe.76.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
In the era of increasingly developing medical services, decision-making about therapy and care is conditioned not only by medical and psychological factors, but also by increasingly institutional and social factors. Which of the factors of the social environment and medical institutions play the greatest role in the process of deciding on therapy and medical care? In seeking answers to the questions posed, reference was made to the theory of "praxis" by P. Bourdieu. These theoretical concepts: habitus, capital field, have been presented in such a way that it is possible to see their impact on the decisions of patients and medical staff and to take into account the dependencies and mutual influences between them. The article refers to Polish and English-language literature. Research results and theoretical conclusions on the impact of social factors and the direct institutional environment on the decision formation of various entities involved in the decision-making process have been presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dominik Maślach
- Department of Public Health, Medical University of Białystok
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The social meanings of choice in living-with advanced breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114047. [PMID: 34090104 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Individual choice is valorised as a core social value; yet the necessity and desirability of making choices takes on new significance for people living with incurable cancer who are required to make often difficult decisions about treatment, care and family life, amidst considerable vulnerability and precariousness. There has been comparatively little exploration of how choice is negotiated and made meaningful under the spectre of incurability and a contracted future. In this paper, drawing on multiple qualitative interviews with 38 women with metastatic breast cancer, we explore how they experience and give meaning to choice in relation to their health (and beyond) in their daily lives. Our analysis highlights that while exercising choice was sometimes a concealed or silent pursuit, choice was always a socially negotiated and temporally unfolding process, nested within relational and interpersonal dynamics. Choices were also often constrained, even foreclosed, due to situational and relational dynamics. Yet even in the absence of choice, the idea of choice-as-control was discursively embraced by women. We argue that greater attention is needed to the affective, temporal and economic dimensions of choice, and how treatment decisions are asymmetrically structured when considered within the normative context of cancer.
Collapse
|
8
|
Preserving social equity in marketized primary care: strategies in Sweden. HEALTH ECONOMICS, POLICY, AND LAW 2021; 16:216-231. [PMID: 32758326 DOI: 10.1017/s1744133120000092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
A primary care choice reform launched in Sweden in 2010 led to a rapid growth of private providers. Critics feared that the reform would lead to an increased tendency among new, profit-driven, providers, to select patients with lower health risks. Even if open risk selection is prohibited, providers can select patients in more subtle ways, such as establishing their practices in areas with higher health status. This paper investigates to what extent strategies were employed by local governments to avoid risk selection and whether there were any differences between left- and right-wing governments in this regard. Three main strategies were used: risk adjustment of the financial reimbursements on the basis of health and/or socio-economic status of listed patients; design of patient listing systems; and regulatory requirements regarding the scope and content of the services that had to be offered by all providers. Additionally, left-wing local governments were more prone than right-wing governments to adopt risk adjustment strategies at the onset of the reform but these differences diminished over time. The findings of the paper contribute to our understanding of how social inequalities may be avoided in tax-based health care systems when market-like steering models such as patient choice are introduced.
Collapse
|
9
|
Irvine A, Drew P, Bower P, Ardern K, Armitage CJ, Barkham M, Brooks H, Connell J, Faija CL, Gellatly J, Rushton K, Welsh C, Bee P. 'So just to go through the options…': patient choice in the telephone delivery of the NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies services. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2021; 43:3-19. [PMID: 32959917 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
This article considers patient choice in mental healthcare services, specifically the ways that choice is enabled or constrained in patient-practitioner spoken interaction. Using the method of conversation analysis (CA), we examine the language used by practitioners when presenting treatment delivery options to patients entering the NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service. Analysis of 66 recordings of telephone-delivered IAPT assessment sessions revealed three patterns through which choice of treatment delivery mode was presented to patients: presenting a single delivery mode; incrementally presenting alternative delivery modes, in response to patient resistance; and parallel presentation of multiple delivery mode options. We show that a distinction should be made between (i) a choice to accept or reject the offer of a single option and (ii) a choice that is a selection from a range of options. We show that the three patterns identified are ordered in terms of patient-centredness and shared decision-making. Our findings contribute to sociological work on healthcare interactions that has identified variability in, and variable consequences for, the ways that patients and practitioners negotiate choice and shared decision-making. Findings are discussed in relation to tensions between the political ideology of patient choice and practical service delivery constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Irvine
- Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, York, UK
| | - Paul Drew
- Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kerry Ardern
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Brooks
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Janice Connell
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cintia L Faija
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Judith Gellatly
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Rushton
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Charlotte Welsh
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dartanto T, Pramono W, Lumbanraja AU, Siregar CH, Bintara H, Sholihah NK, Usman. Enrolment of informal sector workers in the National Health Insurance System in Indonesia: A qualitative study. Heliyon 2020; 6:e05316. [PMID: 33163673 PMCID: PMC7609471 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the main challenges facing the expansion of universal health coverage (UHC) in developing countries like Indonesia is the high prevalence of those working in the informal sector who must voluntarily register in the National Health Insurance System (NHIS). This condition hinders some from being covered by the NHIS. Following Bourdieu's concepts of field, capital and habitus, this research aims to analyse some aspects that influence the decision of informal sector workers to join the NHIS in Indonesia. We conducted qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews of 29 informants and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in the three selected regions of Deli Serdang (North Sumatera), Pandeglang (Banten) and Kupang (East Nusa Tenggara). Using thematic content analysis and several triangulation processes, this study found that three main factors influence the decisions of those working in the informal sector to join the NHIS: health conditions, family and peers, and existing knowledge and experience. The stories provided by the informants regarding their decision-making processes in joining NHIS also reveal the necessary and sufficient conditions that enable informal sector workers to join the NHIS, which are individual-specific and which may differ between people, depending on individual characteristics, regional socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and belief systems. These three factors are all necessary conditions to support the joining of informal sector workers into the NHIS. This study suggests that one possible route for expanding the UHC coverage of informal sector workers is through maximising the word-of-mouth effect by engaging local or influential leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teguh Dartanto
- Research Cluster on Poverty, Social Protection and Development Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Depok, Depok, 16424, Indonesia
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Wahyu Pramono
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Alvin Ulido Lumbanraja
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Chairina Hanum Siregar
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Hamdan Bintara
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Nia Kurnia Sholihah
- Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Campus UI Salemba, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Usman
- PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero), Sahid Sudirman Center 47-48 floor, Jakarta, 10220, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reyes S, Suarez S, Allen-Philbey K, Yildiz Ö, Mathews J, Anjorin G, Edwards F, Jain C, Turner B, Marta M, Gnanapavan S, Schmierer K, Giovannoni G. Socioeconomic status and disease-modifying therapy prescribing patterns in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 41:102024. [PMID: 32143179 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescribing patterns in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS). METHODS A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among pwRRMS treated with a DMT in the neuroinflammation service at The Royal London Hospital (Barts Health NHS Trust). Study data were collected between July and September 2017. SES was determined by patient income and education extracted from the English Index of Multiple Deprivation. Based on their efficacy, DMTs were categorized as moderate efficacy (Glatiramer Acetate and Beta-Interferons), high efficacy (Cladribine, Fingolimod and Dimethyl Fumarate) and very-high efficacy therapies (Natalizumab and Alemtuzumab). Multinomial logistic regressions were performed for univariate and multivariate models to assess differences between SES and DMT prescribing patterns. RESULTS Treatment consisted of moderate efficacy (n = 76, 12%), high efficacy (n = 325, 51.3%) and very-high efficacy therapies (n = 232, 36.7%). Medians for income and education deciles were 4 (IQR 3-7) and 6 (IQR 4-8), respectively. After multinomial logistic regression analysis, patient income was not associated with increased odds of being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.04; p = 0.177) or very-high efficacy DMTs (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.06; p = 0.371). Similarly, patient education was not associated with being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03; p = 0.139) or very-high efficacy therapies (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.04; p = 0.188). CONCLUSIONS SES was not predictive of DMT prescribing patterns in pwRRMS. Whilst this appears reassuring within this universal health care setting, the same methodology needs to be applied to other MS services for comparison. Data could then be further interrogated to explore potential socioeconomic inequities in DMT prescribing patterns across the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saúl Reyes
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom.
| | - Sebastian Suarez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Centre, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Kimberley Allen-Philbey
- Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Özlem Yildiz
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Joela Mathews
- Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Grace Anjorin
- Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Freya Edwards
- Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Cherry Jain
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Turner
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Monica Marta
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Sharmilee Gnanapavan
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus Schmierer
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin Giovannoni
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, 7000 Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schenkman S, Bousquat AEM. Alteridade ou austeridade: uma revisão acerca do valor da equidade em saúde em tempos de crise econômica internacional. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2019; 24:4459-4473. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320182412.23202019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo Nas últimas décadas, o sistema capitalista, transformado por meio de crises mais agressivas e globais, tem submetido a sociedade à austeridade fiscal e tensionado a garantia dos direitos à saúde, como imposição para ampliar a eficiência e efetividade dos sistemas de saúde. A equidade em saúde, por outro lado, opera como fator protetor em relação aos efeitos nocivos da austeridade sobre a saúde da população. O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o efeito da crise financeira global quanto à valorização da equidade em saúde frente à efetividade nas comparações internacionais de eficiência dos sistemas de saúde na literatura científica. Realizada revisão integrativa, com busca nas bases de dados PubMed e BVS, de 2008-18, com análise cross-case. O equilíbrio entre equidade e efetividade deve ser buscado desde o financiamento até os resultados em saúde, de modo eficiente, como forma de fortalecimento dos sistemas de saúde. A escolha entre alteridade ou austeridade deve ser feita de forma explícita e transparente, com resiliência dos valores societais e princípios de universalidade, integralidade e equidade.
Collapse
|
13
|
Visser LM, Benschop YW, Bleijenbergh IL, van Riel AC. Unequal Consumers: Consumerist healthcare technologies and their creation of new inequalities. ORGANIZATION STUDIES 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/0170840618772599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
14
|
Aggarwal A, Bernays S, Payne H, van der Meulen J, Davis C. Hospital Choice in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:e67-e73. [PMID: 29680734 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS There is limited evidence about how patients respond to hospital choice policies, the factors that inform and influence patient choices or how relevant these policies are to cancer patients. This study sought to evaluate hospital choice policies from the perspective of men who received treatment for prostate cancer in the English National Health Service. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of 25 men across England. Fourteen men had chosen to receive treatment at a cancer centre other than their nearest. Interviews were recorded and analysed concurrently with data collection. RESULTS Men highlight that the geographical configuration of specialist services, the perceived urgency of the condition and the protocolisation of treatment pathways all limit their choice of a specialist treatment centre. Diseases such as cancer appear not to be well suited to the patient choice model, given the lack of hospital-level outcome data. Men instead use proxy measures of quality, leaving them vulnerable to influence by marketing and media reports. Men wishing to consider other treatment centres need to independently collect and appraise complex treatment-related information, which creates socioeconomic inequities in access to treatments. A positive impact of the choice agenda is that it enables patients to 'exit care' not meeting their expectations. DISCUSSION Policy makers have failed to consider the organisational, disease-specific and socio-cognitive factors that influence a patient's ability to choose their cancer treatment provider. Valid comparative hospital-level performance information is required to guide patients' choices, otherwise patients will continue to depend on informal sources, which will not necessarily improve their health care outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - S Bernays
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - H Payne
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - C Davis
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haimes E, Taylor K. Sharpening the cutting edge: additional considerations for the UK debates on embryonic interventions for mitochondrial diseases. LIFE SCIENCES, SOCIETY AND POLICY 2017; 13:1. [PMID: 28092013 PMCID: PMC5236032 DOI: 10.1186/s40504-016-0046-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In October 2015 the UK enacted legislation to permit the clinical use of two cutting edge germline-altering, IVF-based embryonic techniques: pronuclear transfer and maternal spindle transfer (PNT and MST). The aim is to use these techniques to prevent the maternal transmission of serious mitochondrial diseases. Major claims have been made about the quality of the debates that preceded this legislation and the significance of those debates for UK decision-making on other biotechnologies, as well as for other countries considering similar legislation. In this article we conduct a systematic analysis of those UK debates and suggest that claims about their quality are over-stated. We identify, and analyse in detail, ten areas where greater clarity, depth and nuance would have produced sharper understandings of the contributions, limitations and wider social impacts of these mitochondrial interventions. We explore the implications of these additional considerations for (i) the protection of all parties involved, should the techniques transfer to clinical applications; (ii) the legitimacy of focussing on short-term gains for individuals over public health considerations, and (iii) the maintenance and improvement of public trust in medical biotechnologies. We conclude that a more measured evaluation of the content and quality of the UK debates is important and timely: such a critique provides a clearer understanding of the possible, but specific, contributions of these interventions, both in the UK and elsewhere; also, these additional insights can now inform the emerging processes of implementation, regulation and practice of mitochondrial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Haimes
- PEALS (Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences) Research Centre, Newcastle University, 4th Floor Claremont Bridge, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK
| | - Ken Taylor
- PEALS (Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences) Research Centre, Newcastle University, 4th Floor Claremont Bridge, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Greenhalgh J, Dalkin S, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Wright J, Meads D, Black N, Valderas JM, Pawson R. Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr05020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe feedback of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data is intended to support the care of individual patients and to act as a quality improvement (QI) strategy.ObjectivesTo (1) identify the ideas and assumptions underlying how individual and aggregated PROMs data are intended to improve patient care, and (2) review the evidence to examine the circumstances in which and processes through which PROMs feedback improves patient care.DesignTwo separate but related realist syntheses: (1) feedback of aggregate PROMs and performance data to improve patient care, and (2) feedback of individual PROMs data to improve patient care.InterventionsAggregate – feedback and public reporting of PROMs, patient experience data and performance data to hospital providers and primary care organisations. Individual – feedback of PROMs in oncology, palliative care and the care of people with mental health problems in primary and secondary care settings.Main outcome measuresAggregate – providers’ responses, attitudes and experiences of using PROMs and performance data to improve patient care. Individual – providers’ and patients’ experiences of using PROMs data to raise issues with clinicians, change clinicians’ communication practices, change patient management and improve patient well-being.Data sourcesSearches of electronic databases and forwards and backwards citation tracking.Review methodsRealist synthesis to identify, test and refine programme theories about when, how and why PROMs feedback leads to improvements in patient care.ResultsProviders were more likely to take steps to improve patient care in response to the feedback and public reporting of aggregate PROMs and performance data if they perceived that these data were credible, were aimed at improving patient care, and were timely and provided a clear indication of the source of the problem. However, implementing substantial and sustainable improvement to patient care required system-wide approaches. In the care of individual patients, PROMs function more as a tool to support patients in raising issues with clinicians than they do in substantially changing clinicians’ communication practices with patients. Patients valued both standardised and individualised PROMs as a tool to raise issues, but thought is required as to which patients may benefit and which may not. In settings such as palliative care and psychotherapy, clinicians viewed individualised PROMs as useful to build rapport and support the therapeutic process. PROMs feedback did not substantially shift clinicians’ communication practices or focus discussion on psychosocial issues; this required a shift in clinicians’ perceptions of their remit.Strengths and limitationsThere was a paucity of research examining the feedback of aggregate PROMs data to providers, and we drew on evidence from interventions with similar programme theories (other forms of performance data) to test our theories.ConclusionsPROMs data act as ‘tin openers’ rather than ‘dials’. Providers need more support and guidance on how to collect their own internal data, how to rule out alternative explanations for their outlier status and how to explore the possible causes of their outlier status. There is also tension between PROMs as a QI strategy versus their use in the care of individual patients; PROMs that clinicians find useful in assessing patients, such as individualised measures, are not useful as indicators of service quality.Future workFuture research should (1) explore how differently performing providers have responded to aggregate PROMs feedback, and how organisations have collected PROMs data both for individual patient care and to improve service quality; and (2) explore whether or not and how incorporating PROMs into patients’ electronic records allows multiple different clinicians to receive PROMs feedback, discuss it with patients and act on the data to improve patient care.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005938.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Greenhalgh
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sonia Dalkin
- Department of Public Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kate Gooding
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Elizabeth Gibbons
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Judy Wright
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Meads
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nick Black
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ray Pawson
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fotaki M. Relational ties of love – A psychosocial proposal for ethics of compassionate care in health and public services. PSYCHODYNAMIC PRACTICE 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2016.1238159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Fotaki
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blom AW, Artz N, Beswick AD, Burston A, Dieppe P, Elvers KT, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Jepson P, Johnson E, Lenguerrand E, Marques E, Noble S, Pyke M, Sackley C, Sands G, Sayers A, Wells V, Wylde V. Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundTotal hip replacements (THRs) and total knee replacements (TKRs) are common elective procedures. In the REsearch STudies into the ORthopaedic Experience (RESTORE) programme, we explored the care and experiences of patients with osteoarthritis after being listed for THR and TKR up to the time when an optimal outcome should be expected.ObjectiveTo undertake a programme of research studies to work towards improving patient outcomes after THR and TKR.MethodsWe used methodologies appropriate to research questions: systematic reviews, qualitative studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), feasibility studies, cohort studies and a survey. Research was supported by patient and public involvement.ResultsSystematic review of longitudinal studies showed that moderate to severe long-term pain affects about 7–23% of patients after THR and 10–34% after TKR. In our cohort study, 10% of patients with hip replacement and 30% with knee replacement showed no clinically or statistically significant functional improvement. In our review of pain assessment few research studies used measures to capture the incidence, character and impact of long-term pain. Qualitative studies highlighted the importance of support by health and social professionals for patients at different stages of the joint replacement pathway. Our review of longitudinal studies suggested that patients with poorer psychological health, physical function or pain before surgery had poorer long-term outcomes and may benefit from pre-surgical interventions. However, uptake of a pre-operative pain management intervention was low. Although evidence relating to patient outcomes was limited, comorbidities are common and may lead to an increased risk of adverse events, suggesting the possible value of optimising pre-operative management. The evidence base on clinical effectiveness of pre-surgical interventions, occupational therapy and physiotherapy-based rehabilitation relied on small RCTs but suggested short-term benefit. Our feasibility studies showed that definitive trials of occupational therapy before surgery and post-discharge group-based physiotherapy exercise are feasible and acceptable to patients. Randomised trial results and systematic review suggest that patients with THR should receive local anaesthetic infiltration for the management of long-term pain, but in patients receiving TKR it may not provide additional benefit to femoral nerve block. From a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective, local anaesthetic infiltration was a cost-effective treatment in primary THR. In qualitative interviews, patients and health-care professionals recognised the importance of participating in the RCTs. To support future interventions and their evaluation, we conducted a study comparing outcome measures and analysed the RCTs as cohort studies. Analyses highlighted the importance of different methods in treating and assessing hip and knee osteoarthritis. There was an inverse association between radiographic severity of osteoarthritis and pain and function in patients waiting for TKR but no association in THR. Different pain characteristics predicted long-term pain in THR and TKR. Outcomes after joint replacement should be assessed with a patient-reported outcome and a functional test.ConclusionsThe RESTORE programme provides important information to guide the development of interventions to improve long-term outcomes for patients with osteoarthritis receiving THR and TKR. Issues relating to their evaluation and the assessment of patient outcomes are highlighted. Potential interventions at key times in the patient pathway were identified and deserve further study, ultimately in the context of a complex intervention.Study registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN52305381.FundingThis project was funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley W Blom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Neil Artz
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew D Beswick
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amanda Burston
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul Dieppe
- Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Karen T Elvers
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rachael Gooberman-Hill
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul Jepson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Johnson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Erik Lenguerrand
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Elsa Marques
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mark Pyke
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Gina Sands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Adrian Sayers
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Victoria Wells
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Vikki Wylde
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sheppard MK. The paradox of non-evidence based, publicly funded complementary alternative medicine in the English National Health Service: An explanation. Health Policy 2015; 119:1375-81. [PMID: 25837235 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Despite the unproven effectiveness of many practices that are under the umbrella term 'complementary alternative medicine' (CAM), there is provision of CAM within the English National Health Service (NHS). Moreover, although the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was established to promote scientifically validated medicine in the NHS, the paradox of publicly funded, non-evidence based CAM can be explained as linked with government policy of patient choice and specifically patient treatment choice. Patient choice is useful in the political and policy discourse as it is open to different interpretations and can be justified by policy-makers who rely on the traditional NHS values of equity and universality. Treatment choice finds expression in the policy of personalised healthcare linked with patient responsibilisation which finds resonance in the emphasis CAM places on self-care and self-management. More importantly, however, policy-makers also use patient choice and treatment choice as a policy initiative with the objective of encouraging destabilisation of the entrenched healthcare institutions and practices considered resistant to change. This political strategy of system reform has the unintended, paradoxical consequence of allowing for the emergence of non-evidence based, publicly funded CAM in the NHS. The political and policy discourse of patient choice thus trumps evidence based medicine, with patients that demand access to CAM becoming the unwitting beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Sheppard
- Law Department, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fotaki M. Can consumer choice replace trust in the National Health Service in England? Towards developing an affective psychosocial conception of trust in health care. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2014; 36:1276-1294. [PMID: 25470326 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Trust has long been regarded as a vitally important aspect of the relationship between health service providers and patients. Recently, consumer choice has been increasingly advocated as a means of improving the quality and effectiveness of health service provision. However, it is uncertain how the increase of information necessary to allow users of health services to exercise choice, and the simultaneous introduction of markets in public health systems, will affect various dimensions of trust, and how changing relations of trust will impact upon patients and services. This article employs a theory-driven approach to investigate conceptual and material links between choice, trust and markets in health care in the context of the National Health Service in England. It also examines the implications of patient choice on systemic, organisational and interpersonal trust. The article is divided into two parts. The first argues that the shift to marketisation in public health services might lead to an over-reliance on rational-calculative aspects of trust at the expense of embodied, relational and social attributes. The second develops an alternative psychosocial conception of trust: it focuses on the central role of affect and accounts for the material and symbolic links between choice, trust and markets in health care.
Collapse
|
21
|
Holman D. What help can you get talking to somebody?’ Explaining class differences in the use of talking treatments. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2014; 36:531-548. [PMID: 25650443 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Talking treatments are underused in England by working-class people: their higher rates of common mental disorders compared with their middle-class counterparts are not matched by an increased use of these treatments. Given that,overall, talking treatments are effective in tackling depression and anxiety,understanding their underuse is important. Based upon semi-structured interview data I argue that a framework centred on individuals' cultural dispositions towards treatment can help with this task. Following Bourdieu, such dispositions can be traced to social structural conditioning factors, together comprising the habitus. Four key dispositions emerge from the data: verbalisation and introspection, impetus for emotional health, relation to medical authority and practical orientation to the future. In turn, these dispositions are rooted in the material, health, occupational and educational characteristics of working-class circumstances. Tracing these circumstances offers suggestions for increasing the use of this service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Holman
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Öcek ZA, Çiçeklioğlu M, Yücel U, Özdemir R. Family medicine model in Turkey: a qualitative assessment from the perspectives of primary care workers. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2014; 15:38. [PMID: 24571275 PMCID: PMC3942270 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A person-list-based family medicine model was introduced in Turkey during health care reforms. This study aimed to explore from primary care workers' perspectives whether this model could achieve the cardinal functions of primary care and have an integrative position in the health care system. METHODS Four groups of primary care workers were included in this exploratory-descriptive study. The first two groups were family physicians (FP) (n = 51) and their ancillary personnel (n = 22). The other two groups were physicians (n = 44) and midwives/nurses (n = 11) working in community health centres. Participants were selected for maximum variation and 102 in-depth interviews and six focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured form. RESULTS Data analysis yielded five themes: accessibility, first-contact care, longitudinality, comprehensiveness, and coordination. Most participants stated that many people are not registered with any FP and that the majority of these belong to the most disadvantaged groups in society. FPs reported that 40-60% of patients on their lists have never received a service from them and the majority of those who use their services do not use FPs as the first point of contact. According to most participants, the list-based system improved the longitudinality of the relationship between FPs and patients. However, based on other statements, this improvement only applies to one quarter of the population. Whereas there was an improvement limited to a quantitative increase in services (immunisation, monitoring of pregnant women and infants) included in the performance-based contracting system, participants stated that services not among the performance targets, such as family planning, postpartum follow-ups, and chronic disease management, could be neglected. FPs admitted not being able to keep informed of services their patients had received at other health institutions. Half of the participants stated that the list-based system removed the possibility of evaluating the community as a whole. CONCLUSIONS According to our findings, FPs have a limited role as the first point of contact and in giving longitudinal, comprehensive, and coordinated care. The family medicine model in Turkey is unable to provide a suitable structure to integrate health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeliha Asli Öcek
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
| | - Meltem Çiçeklioğlu
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ummahan Yücel
- Ege University Izmir Atatürk School of Health, Department of Midwifery, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Raziye Özdemir
- Karabuk University School of Health, Department of Midwifery, Karabuk, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Exit, voice, and loyalty in the Italian public health service: macroeconomic and corporate implications. ScientificWorldJournal 2013; 2013:292745. [PMID: 24348148 PMCID: PMC3857716 DOI: 10.1155/2013/292745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The paper analyses how customers of public health organizations can express their dissatisfaction for the services offered to them. The main aim is to evaluate the effects that possible dissatisfaction of Italian public health service customers can have on public health organizations. We adopted the methodological scheme developed by Hirschman with exit, voice, and loyalty, considering the macroeconomic and corporate implications that it causes for Italian public health organizations. The study investigated the effects developed by exit of the patients on the system of financing of local health authorities considering both the corporate level of analysis and the macroeconomic level. As a result, local health authority management is encouraged to pay greater attention to the exit phenomena through the adoption of tools that promote loyalty, such as the promotion of voice, even if exit is not promoting, at a macroeconomic level, considerable attention to this phenomenon.
Collapse
|
24
|
MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Lippel K, Neilson C, Franche RL, Pugliese D. The ideal of consumer choice in social services: challenges with implementation in an Ontario injured worker vocational retraining programme. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35:2171-9. [DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.771704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
25
|
Kovandžić M, Funnell E, Hammond J, Ahmed A, Edwards S, Clarke P, Hibbert D, Bristow K, Dowrick C. The space of access to primary mental health care: A qualitative case study. Health Place 2012; 18:536-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2011] [Revised: 10/27/2011] [Accepted: 01/29/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
26
|
Sonneveld RE, Wensing M, Bronkhorst EM, Truin GJ, Brands WG. The estimation of patients' views on organizational aspects of a general dental practice by general dental practitioners: a survey study. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:263. [PMID: 21989235 PMCID: PMC3204231 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2011] [Accepted: 10/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Considering the changes in dental healthcare, such as the increasing assertiveness of patients, the introduction of new dental professionals, and regulated competition, it becomes more important that general dental practitioners (GDPs) take patients' views into account. The aim of the study was to compare patients' views on organizational aspects of general dental practices with those of GDPs and with GDPs' estimation of patients' views. Methods In a survey study, patients and GDPs provided their views on organizational aspects of a general dental practice. In a second, separate survey, GDPs were invited to estimate patients' views on 22 organizational aspects of a general dental practice. Results For 4 of the 22 aspects, patients and GDPs had the same views, and GDPs estimated patients' views reasonably well: 'Dutch-speaking GDP', 'guarantee on treatment', 'treatment by the same GDP', and 'reminder of routine oral examination'. For 2 aspects ('quality assessment' and 'accessibility for disabled patients') patients and GDPs had the same standards, although the GDPs underestimated the patients' standards. Patients had higher standards than GDPs for 7 aspects and lower standards than GDPs for 8 aspects. Conclusion On most aspects GDPs and patient have different views, except for social desirable aspects. Given the increasing assertiveness of patients, it is startling the GDP's estimated only half of the patients' views correctly. The findings of the study can assist GDPs in adapting their organizational services to better meet the preferences of their patients and to improve the communication towards patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger E Sonneveld
- Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Philips van Leijdenlaan 25, 6525 EX Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Agency versus structure or nature versus nurture: When the new twist on an old debate is not that new after all. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73:639-42; discussion 643-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2011] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
28
|
Robertson R, Burge1 P. The impact of patient choice of provider on equity: Analysis of a patient survey. J Health Serv Res Policy 2011; 16 Suppl 1:22-8. [DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To understand the impact on equity of giving patients a choice of provider. Methods A postal survey of 5997 patients in four areas of England about choice at their recent referral and, using a discrete choice experiment, how they would choose in hypothetical situations. Binary logistic regression and a series of multinomial and nested logit models were used to analyse the data to discover whether patients with particular characteristics were more likely to: think choice is important; be offered a choice; and, choose a non-local provider. Results The response rate was 36%. Choice was more important to older patients aged 51-80 years, patients from non-white backgrounds, women, those with no qualifications and those with a bad past experience of their local hospital. There were no significant differences in who was offered a choice in terms of education, age group or ethnicity. In both real and hypothetical situations patients with no formal qualifications and those living in urban centres were more likely to choose their local hospital, and patients with a bad or mixed past experience at the local hospital were more likely to choose an alternative. In hypothetical choices those who do not normally travel by car and without Internet access were more likely to choose their local hospital irrespective of that hospital's characteristics. Conclusions More educated, affluent patients were no more likely to be offered a choice than other population groups, but there does appear to be a social gradient in who chose to travel beyond the local area for treatment. If these results were replicated across England, there is at least the potential risk that when local hospitals are failing, patient choice could result in inequitable access to high quality care, rather than enhancing equity as the policy's architects had hoped.
Collapse
|