The levodopa dose-sparing capacity of pergolide compared with that of bromocriptine in an open-label, crossover study

Restoring pars intermedia dopamine concentrations and tyrosine hydroxylase expression levels with pergolide: evidence from horses with pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction

Background

Pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) develops slowly in aged horses as degeneration of hypothalamic dopaminergic neurons leads to proliferation of pars intermedia (PI) melanotropes through hyperplasia and adenoma formation. Dopamine (DA) concentrations and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunoreactivity are markedly reduced in PI tissue of PPID-affected equids and treatment with the DA receptor agonist pergolide results in notable clinical improvement. Thus, we hypothesized that pergolide treatment of PPID-affected horses would result in greater DA and TH levels in PI tissue collected from PPID-affected horses versus untreated PPID-affected horses.

To test this hypothesis, pituitary glands were removed from 18 horses: four untreated PPID-affected horses, four aged and four young horses without signs of PPID, and six PPID-affected horses that had been treated with pergolide at 2 µg/kg orally once daily for 6 months. DA concentrations and TH expression levels in PI tissues were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and Western blot analyses, respectively.

Results

DA and TH levels were lowest in PI collected from untreated PPID-affected horses while levels in the pergolide treated horses were similar to those of aged horses without signs of PPID.

Conclusions

These findings provide evidence of restoration of DA and TH levels following treatment with pergolide. Equine PPID is a potential animal model of dopaminergic neurodegeneration, which could provide insight into human neurodegenerative diseases.

Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section. Part I: early (uncomplicated) Parkinson's disease

The aim of the study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of early (uncomplicated) Parkinson's disease (PD), based on a review of the literature. Uncomplicated PD refers to patients suffering from the classical motor syndrome of PD only, without treatment-induced motor complications and without neuropsychiatric or autonomic problems. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) database literature searches were conducted. National guidelines were requested from all European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) societies. Non-European guidelines were searched for using MEDLINE. Part I of the guidelines deals with prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), and prevention of motor and neuropsychiatric complications of therapy. For each topic, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence. Following this, recommendations for management are given, alongside ratings of efficacy. Classifications of evidence and ratings of efficacy are made according to EFNS guidance. In cases where there is insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement (good practice point) is made.

Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinsonʼs disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in the management of both advanced and early-stage Parkinson's disease. Unfortunately, randomized head-to-head comparative studies between the many different dopamine agonists now available are sparse. Indirect comparisons of dopamine agonists show that ergot derivatives, such as pergolide and cabergoline, are as effective as non-ergot derivatives, such as ropinirole and pramipexole, in ameliorating Parkinson's disease symptoms in patients in early or advanced stages of the condition. As far as safety and tolerability are concerned, no significant differences between dopamine agonists are found. However, some specific adverse events, such as somnolence and sleep attacks, seem less frequent in monotherapy studies with pergolide than in those with the non-ergot dopamine agonists; however, because of the lack of direct-comparison studies this cannot be proved conclusively. Randomized, controlled comparative studies between dopamine agonists are necessary to verify any possible differences in their effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Appropriate dosing of pergolide in monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in Parkinsonʼs disease

Pergolide is one of the most well-tested and widely used dopamine agonists for the treatment of Parkinson's disease; however, there is worrying evidence that sub-therapeutic dosing of pergolide is widespread in clinical practice. Clinical studies in Caucasians suggest that a pergolide dose of 3 mg/day provides the optimal efficacy to tolerability ratio and that, in Japanese patients, a dose in excess of 2.25 mg/day may be ideal. Whether pergolide is used early in patients with de-novo Parkinson's disease or as adjunctive therapy later in the disease, in order to optimize its clinical efficacy, it is recommended that practitioners aim to achieve at least these doses, or higher ones, if the drug is well tolerated.

Randomized, double-blind study of pramipexole with placebo and bromocriptine in advanced Parkinson's disease

We compared the efficacy and safety of pramipexole (PPX) with placebo in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) as an adjunct to levodopa. A bromocriptine (BR) group was included to enable determination of the noninferiority of PPX relative to BR as the standard treatment.

Levodopa-induced response fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease: strategies for management

Fluctuations in response to levodopa in patients in the advanced stages of idiopathic Parkinson's disease occur frequently and are a difficult problem to treat. Patients who are treated with levodopa have an additional 10% risk of experiencing response fluctuations with each year of treatment: 50% of patients have this problem after 5 years of receiving levodopa therapy and almost 100% of patients after 10 years. The mechanisms by which response fluctuations occur are only partially understood and can be divided into three main types: (i) presynaptic neuronal degeneration leading to a lack of buffering of released levodopa, which is mainly related to wearing-off phenomena; (ii) postsynaptic changes in dopamine receptor sensitivity and number, partially caused by the presynaptic changes, which are clinically related to at-random response fluctuations; and (iii) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic influences of exogenously administered dopaminergic agents. Several oral and parenteral treatment strategies are recommended to manage response fluctuations, such as optimisation of dopamine receptor agonist therapy in combination with a reduction of the levodopa load; use of slow-release levodopa formulations; use of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors; an increase of levodopa dose frequency; use of high-dose amantadine; and intermittent or continuous use of apomorphine and/or levodopa. Continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors with dopaminergic agents is one of the crucial basic steps in the treatment of patients at an advanced stage of Parkinson's disease, and the preferential use of dopamine receptor agonists has proven to be successful in the prevention and treatment of response fluctuations.

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.

Long-term Medical Treatment for Parkinson's Disease

The authors of this paper view Parkinson's disease (PD) as a clinically defined progressive syndrome of resting limb tremor, bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, and a shuffling unsteady gait that responds well to dopaminergic medications. Parkinson's disease is a not a single entity, but rather a syndrome with diverse causes, with both genetic and environmental risk factors. The clinician's concern is to rule out other entities, especially those having another specific treatment, and to give PD patients the best short- and long-term benefit, with the least possible unwanted side effects.

Cost-effectiveness of pergolide compared to bromocriptine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a decision-analytic model

OBJECTIVE

To develop a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of pergolide versus bromocriptine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

A Markov decision-analytic model is used to examine cost-effectiveness. The model ran for 20 cycles of 6 months' duration, and the patients progress through six stages: Hoehn-Yahr stages 1-5 and death. The transitional probabilities for each stage are derived from a 12-year longitudinal study of patients with PD. The costs in the model are derived from an expert panel containing six Australian neurologists. A review of the randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of pergolide versus bromocriptine was undertaken. Five studies were identified, with four showing that pergolide offers superior efficacy when compared to bromocriptine. The Mizuno et al. (1995) study was the largest of the controlled trials and also measured patient Hoehn-Yahr status before and after treatment. This was identified as the most appropriate source of relative efficacy data for the model. The model examined various scenarios based on alternate durations of superior clinical benefit with pergolide compared to bromocriptine. The main analysis assumed that patients in each arm of the model would have identical Hoehn-Yahr status by the fifth year. Sensitivity analysis was used to determine cost-effectiveness in the case where the therapeutic benefit was of a shorter duration.

RESULTS

The Mizuno study indicates that an additional 19.09% of patients improved by at least one stage on pergolide over bromocriptine, with an odds ratio of 2.26 (p < .01). The total health care cost per patient over the 10-year period was $46,323 in the pergolide treatment arm and $47,351 in the bromocriptine treatment arm, an incremental saving of $1028. Patients also spent extra time in Hoehn-Yahr stages 1, 2, and 3. In sensitivity analyses, when the benefit from pergolide expired between 6 months and 5 years after treatment cessation, cost savings ranged from $68 to $2535.

CONCLUSION

Pergolide is cost saving and more efficacious than bromocriptine, and is therefore cost-effective.

Pergolide versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced motor complications in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of adjunct pergolide therapy versus bromocriptine in patients with Parkinson's disease, already established on levodopa and suffering the long-term complications of therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Handsearching of the neurology literature as part of the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group's strategy. Examination of the reference lists of identified studies and other reviews. Contact with Eli Lilly Company and Sandoz Limited.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of pergolide versus bromocriptine in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was abstracted independently by each author and differences settled by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Three short-term trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the review. Pergolide was superior to bromocriptine regarding UPDRS and NYPDS motor and NYPDS ADL scores in two trials. More patients recorded a 'marked' or 'moderate improvement' in clinician's global impression score with pergolide than bromocriptine in two studies. Insufficient evidence on fluctuations and dyskinesia was available to draw any conclusions. No significant differences between the agonists were seen in levodopa dose reduction, drop outs or adverse events.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although pergolide is superior to bromocriptine in reducing motor impairments and disability, no firm conclusions regarding levodopa-induced motor complications can be reached. Levodopa dose reduction, adverse events and withdrawals from treatment are similar for the two agonists. The small advantage of pergolide in efficacy does not take into account its additional cost compared with bromocriptine.