Integrin beta-3 L33P: a new insight into the pathogenesis of chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy?

Association between Genetic Variants and Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with NSCLC Treated with First-Line Platinum-Based Therapy

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, disabling side effect in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-based therapy. There is increasing evidence for associations between genetic variants and susceptibility to CIPN. The aim of this study was to further explore genetic risk factors for CIPN by investigating previously reported genetic associations. Methods: A multicenter prospective follow-up study (PGxLUNG, NTR NL5373610015) in NSCLC patients (stage II-IV) treated with first-line platinum-based (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy was conducted. Clinical evaluation of neuropathy (CTCAE v4.03) was performed at baseline and before each cycle (four cycles, every three weeks) of chemotherapy and at three and six months after treatment initiation. The relationship between 34 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 26 genes and any grade (grade ≥ 1) and severe (grade ≥ 2) CIPN was assessed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression modelling. Results: In total, 320 patients were included of which 26.3% (n = 84) and 8.1% (n = 26) experienced any grade and severe CIPN, respectively. The GG-genotype (rs879207, A > G) of TRPV1, a gene expressed in peripheral sensory neurons, was observed in 11.3% (n = 36) of the patients and associated with an increased risk of severe neuropathy (OR 5.2, 95%CI 2.1−12.8, adjusted p-value 0.012). A quarter (25%, n = 9/36) of the patients with the GG-genotype developed severe neuropathy compared to 6% (n = 17/282) of the patients with the AG- or AA-genotype. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed statistically significant associations between the GG-genotype (ORadj 4.7, 95%CI 1.8−12.3) and between concomitant use of paclitaxel (ORadj 7.2, 95%CI 2.5−21.1) and severe CIPN. Conclusions: Patients with the GG-genotype (rs879207) of TRPV1 have an almost 5-fold higher risk of developing severe neuropathy when treated with platinum-based therapy. Future studies should aim to validate these findings in an independent cohort and to further investigated the individualization of platinum-based chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Management of Side Effects in the Personalized Medicine Era: Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity

Pharmacogenomics is a powerful tool to predict individual response to treatment, in order to personalize therapy, and it has been explored extensively in oncology practice. Not only efficacy on the malignant disease has been investigated but also the possibility to predict adverse effects due to drug administration. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of those. This potentially severe and long-lasting/permanent side effect of commonly administered anticancer drugs can severely impair quality of life (QoL) in a large cohort of long survival patients. So far, a pharmacogenomics-based approach in CIPN regard has been quite delusive, making a methodological improvement warranted in this field of interest: even the most refined genetic analysis cannot be effective if not applied correctly. Here we try to devise why it is so, suggesting how THE "bench-side" (pharmacogenomics) might benefit from and should cooperate with THE "bed-side" (clinimetrics), in order to make genetic profiling effective if applied to CIPN.

Systematic review of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) following adjuvant oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin. It often persists and can adversely affect quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. This systematic review explored the proportions of patients with persistent CIPN and the reporting methods used.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched up to March 2021 for publications reporting CIPN outcomes following adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy at prespecified timepoints in participants with CRC. Secondary outcomes assessed the tools used to measure CIPN. Two authors reviewed full text publications for eligibility, data extraction and appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed where Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (any grade) was reported at the most frequent timepoints.

RESULTS

From 7895 citations identified, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria: six were randomised control trials, and 21 were non-randomised studies. Pooled prevalence of CIPN at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after chemotherapy were 58%, 45%, 32% and 24% respectively. The average prevalence of CIPN decreased by 26% per year after chemotherapy (pooled RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.72-0.75). Across all studies, ten separate tools were used as the primary measure of CIPN. Quality appraisal identified open-label design and inadequate reporting of participants lost to follow-up as the main methodological limitations.

CONCLUSION

Our summary of reported rates of persistent CIPN indicates substantial long-term toxicity affecting CRC survivors, and will help clinicians estimate CIPN risk and its change over time. The heterogeneity of CIPN measures identified in the review highlights the need for a standardised CIPN assessment.

αvβ3 Integrin Antagonists Enhance Chemotherapy Response in an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Model

Pancreatic cancer decreases survival time and quality of life because of drug resistance and peripheral neuropathy during conventional treatment. This study was undertaken to investigate whether αvβ3 integrin receptor antagonist compounds NDAT and XT199 can suppress the development of cisplatin resistance and cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in an orthotopic pancreatic SUIT2-luc cancer cell mouse model. Anticancer effects of these compounds and their combination with cisplatin were assessed in this tumor mouse model with bioluminescent signaling and histopathology, and a cytokine assay was used to examine expression of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α from plasma samples. To determine the neuroprotective effects of the compounds on cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, behavioral hind-limb posture of the mice was evaluated. The combination therapy of NDAT or XT199 with cisplatin elicited greater inhibition of tumor growth and increased tumor necrosis compared to cisplatin alone. NDAT and XT199 in combination with cisplatin significantly decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α and significantly increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in comparison to cisplatin alone. Cisplatin-treated groups showed stocking-glove hind-limb posture, whereas NDAT and XT199 with cisplatin-treated groups displayed normal hind-limb posture. Results clearly suggest that NDAT and XT199 treatment with cisplatin that inactivates NF-κB may contribute to increased antitumor and anti-inflammatory efficacy as well as alleviate cisplatin-mediated loss of motor function in this pancreatic tumor mouse model.

The molecular genetics of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can adversely affect completion of systemic anti-cancer treatment and cause long-term morbidity. Increasingly pharmacogenetic studies have been performed to explore susceptibility to this important adverse effect. A systematic review was conducted to identify pharmacogenetic studies, assess their quality and findings and undertake meta-analysis where possible. 93 studies were included. Notable methodological issues included lack of standardisation and detail in phenotype definition and acknowledgement of potential confounding factors. Insufficient data was presented in many studies meaning only a minority could be included in meta-analysis showing mainly non-significant effects. Nonetheless, SNPs in CYP2C8, CYP3A4, ARHGEF10, EPHA and TUBB2A genes (taxanes), FARS2, ACYP2 and TAC1 (oxaliplatin), and CEP75 and CYP3A5 (vincristine) are of potential interest. These require exploration in large cohort studies with robust methodology and well-defined phenotypes. Seeking standardisation of phenotype, collaboration and subsequently, individual-patient-data meta-analysis may facilitate identifying contributory SNPs which could be combined in a polygenic risk score to predict those most at risk of CIPN.

Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy is a common, dose-dependent adverse effect of several antineoplastics. It can lead to detrimental dose reductions and discontinuation of treatment, and severely affects the quality of life of cancer survivors. Clinically, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy presents as deficits in sensory, motor, and autonomic function which develop in a glove and stocking distribution due to preferential effects on longer axons. The pathophysiological processes are multi-factorial and involve oxidative stress, apoptotic mechanisms, altered calcium homeostasis, axon degeneration and membrane remodeling as well as immune processes and neuroinflammation. This review focusses on the commonly used antineoplastic substances oxaliplatin, cisplatin, vincristine, docetaxel, and paclitaxel which interfere with the cancer cell cycle-leading to cell death and tumor degradation-and cause severe acute and chronic peripheral neuropathies. We discuss drug mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic disposition relevant to the development of peripheral neuropathy, the epidemiology and clinical presentation of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, emerging insight into genetic susceptibilities as well as current understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment approaches.

Informative gene network for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Host genetic variability has been implicated in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). A dose-limiting toxicity for chemotherapy agents, CIPN is also a debilitating condition that may progress to chronic neuropathic pain. We utilized a bioinformatics approach, which captures the complexity of intracellular and intercellular interactions, to identify genes for CIPN.

METHODS

Using genes pooled from the literature as a starting point, we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to generate gene networks for CIPN.

RESULTS

We performed IPA core analysis for genes associated with platinum-, taxane- and platinum-taxane-induced neuropathy. We found that IL6, TNF, CXCL8, IL1B and ERK1/2 were the top genes in terms of the number of connections in platinum-induced neuropathy and TP53, MYC, PARP1, P38 MAPK and TNF for combined taxane-platinum-induced neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Neurotoxicity is common in cancer patients treated with platinum compounds and anti-microtubule agents and CIPN is one of the debilitating sequela. The bioinformatic approach helped identify genes associated with CIPN in cancer patients.

Updates on Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity (OXAIPN)

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXAIPN) is of great clinical interest as it ranks among the most common dose limiting toxicities of oxaliplatin (OXA) administration with an obvious impact on the outcome of cancer patients. In addition, OXAIPN has a detrimental effect on the quality of life of cancer patients because it can be long lasting or even permanent. It has a unique spectrum of clinical presentation, being manifested with two distinct syndromes: the acute neurotoxicity that appears soon after OXA administration and is usually transient, and the chronic cumulative syndrome that resembles the characteristics of all platinum compounds. Despite advances in research in relation to the elucidation of the true OXAIPN pathogenesis, characteristics and management, there are still several open issues to be addressed. One of the most important open issues is to determine reliable biomarkers to allow prompt identification of patients at high risk to develop OXAIPN and towards this view well designed genome wide analyses are warranted to adequately address this gap in knowledge. Recent updates are provided in this article in relation to the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, pharmacogenetics and management of OXAIPN.

Management of side effects in the personalized medicine era: chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Pharmacogenomics has been establishing itself as a powerful tool to predict individual response to treatment, in order to personalize therapy management; this field has been explored in particular in Oncology. Not only efficacy on the malignant disease has been investigated, but also the possibility to predict adverse effects due to drug administration. Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of those. This potentially severe and long-lasting/permanent side effect of commonly administered anticancer drugs can severely impair Quality of Life (QoL) in a large cohort of long survival patients. So far, a pharmacogenomics-based approach in CIPN regard has been quite delusive, making a methodological improvement warranted in this field of interest: even the most refined genetic analysis cannot be effective if not applied correctly. Here, we try to devise why it is so, suggesting how THE "bench-side" (Pharmacogenomics) might benefit from and should cooperate with THE "bed-side" (Clinimetrics), in order to make genetic profiling effective if applied to CIPN.

Platinum-induced neurotoxicity and preventive strategies: past, present, and future

Neurotoxicity is a burdensome side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy that prevents administration of the full efficacious dosage and often leads to treatment withdrawal. Peripheral sensory neurotoxicity varies from paresthesia in fingers to ataxic gait, which might be transient or irreversible. Because the number of patients being treated with these neurotoxic agents is still increasing, the need for understanding the pathogenesis of this dramatic side effect is critical. Platinum derivatives, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, harm mainly peripheral nerves and dorsal root ganglia neurons, possibly because of progressive DNA-adduct accumulation and inhibition of DNA repair pathways (e.g., extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinass), which finally mediate apoptosis. Oxaliplatin, with a completely different pharmacokinetic profile, may also alter calcium-sensitive voltage-gated sodium channel kinetics through a calcium ion immobilization by oxalate residue as a calcium chelator and cause acute neurotoxicity. Polymorphisms in several genes, such as voltage-gated sodium channel genes or genes affecting the activity of pivotal metal transporters (e.g., organic cation transporters, organic cation/carnitine transporters, and some metal transporters, such as the copper transporters, and multidrug resistance-associated proteins), can also influence drug neurotoxicity and treatment response. However, most pharmacogenetics studies need to be elucidated by robust evidence. There are supportive reports about the effectiveness of several neuroprotective agents (e.g., vitamin E, glutathione, amifostine, xaliproden, and venlafaxine), but dose adjustment and/or drug withdrawal seem to be the most frequently used methods in the management of platinum-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. To develop alternative options in the treatment of platinum-induced neuropathy, studies on in vitro models and appropriate trials planning should be integrated into the future design of neuroprotective strategies to find the best patient-oriented solution.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adults: a comprehensive update of the literature

Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in oncology/hematology practice, causing toxic peripheral neuropathy, include taxanes, platinum compounds, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and antiangiogenic/immunomodulatory agents. This review paper intends to put together and discuss the spectrum of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) characteristics so as to highlight areas of future research to pursue on the topic. Current knowledge shows that the pathogenesis of CIPN still remains elusive, mostly because there are several sites of involvement in the peripheral nervous system. In any case, it is acknowledged that the dorsal root ganglia of the primary sensory neurons are the most common neural targets of CIPN. Both the incidence and severity of CIPN are clinically under- and misreported, and it has been demonstrated that scoring CIPN with common toxicity scales is associated with significant inter-observer variability. Only a proportion of chemotherapy-treated patients develop treatment-emergent and persistent CIPN, and to date it has been impossible to predict high-and low-risk subjects even within groups who receive the same drug regimen. This issue has recently been investigated in the context of pharmacogenetic analyses, but these studies have not implemented a proper methodological approach and their results are inconsistent and not really clinically relevant. As such, a stringent approach has to be implemented to validate that information. Another open issue is that, at present, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any of the already tested chemoprotective agents to prevent or limit CIPN. The results of comprehensive interventions, including clinical, neurophysiological, and pharmacogenetic approaches, are expected to produce a consistent advantage for both doctors and patients and thus allow the registration and analysis of reliable data on the true characteristics of CIPN, eventually leading to potential preventive and therapeutic interventions.

Pathobiology of cancer chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a type of neuropathic pain that is a major dose-limiting side-effect of potentially curative cancer chemotherapy treatment regimens that develops in a "stocking and glove" distribution. When pain is severe, a change to less effective chemotherapy agents may be required, or patients may choose to discontinue treatment. Medications used to alleviate CIPN often lack efficacy and/or have unacceptable side-effects. Hence the unmet medical need for novel analgesics for relief of this painful condition has driven establishment of rodent models of CIPN. New insights on the pathobiology of CIPN gained using these models are discussed in this review. These include mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress that are implicated as key mechanisms in the development of CIPN. Associated structural changes in peripheral nerves include neuronopathy, axonopathy and/or myelinopathy, especially intra-epidermal nerve fiber (IENF) degeneration. In patients with CIPN, loss of heat sensitivity is a hallmark symptom due to preferential damage to myelinated primary afferent sensory nerve fibers in the presence or absence of demyelination. The pathobiology of CIPN is complex as cancer chemotherapy treatment regimens frequently involve drug combinations. Adding to this complexity, there are also subtle differences in the pathobiological consequences of commonly used cancer chemotherapy drugs, viz platinum compounds, taxanes, vincristine, bortezomib, thalidomide and ixabepilone, on peripheral nerves.

Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colorectal cancer: many questions with few answers

Oxaliplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent effective against advanced colorectal cancer. Unlike with other platinum-based agents, the main side effect of oxaliplatin is polyneuropathy. Oxaliplatin-induced polyneuropathy (OIPN) has a unique profile, which can be divided into acute and chronic neurotoxicity. Early identification of the neurotoxicity and alterations in dose or schedule for the medication could prevent the development of chronic symptoms, which, once established, may take many months or years to resolve or even persist throughout life with a substantial effect on quality of life. There is no doubt that the use of pharmacogenomic methods to identify genetic bases of interindividual differences in drug response has led to what is called tailoring treatment. Yet there are some challenges regarding the application of these differences. Many efforts have been made to prevent or treat OIPN. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the acute and chronic forms of OIPN will be a key component of future advances in the prevention and treatment of OIPN. The aim of this review is to highlight the clinical presentation, assessment, and management of OIPN, as well as the underlying pathophysiologic and pharmacogenomic background.

Peripheral neuropathies from chemotherapeutics and targeted agents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

Peripheral neuropathies induced by chemotherapy (CIPN) are an increasingly frequent problem. Contrary to hematologic adverse effects, which can be treated with hematopoetic growth factors, neither prophylaxis nor specific treatment is available, and only symptomatic treatment can be offered. Neurotoxic drugs are becoming a major dose-limiting factor. The epidemiology is still unclear. Several drug-dependent pathogenetic mechanisms exist. CIPN are predominately sensory, length-dependent neuropathies that develop after a typical cumulative dose. Usually, the appearance of CIPN is dose dependent, although in at least 2 drugs (oxaliplatin and taxanes), immediate toxic effects occur. The most frequent substances causing CIPN are platin compounds, vinka alkaloids, taxanes, and bortezomib and thalidomide. The role of synergistic neurotoxicity caused by previously given chemo-therapies and concomitant chemotherapies and the role pre-existent neuropathy on the development of a CIPN is not clear. As the number of long-term cancer survivors increases and a new focus on long-term effects of chemotherapy-induced neuropathies emerge, concepts of rehabilitation need to be implemented to improve the patients' functions and quality of life.

Association between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy has been investigated in a number of published studies. However, most of these studies were based on small sample sizes and the results remained inconsistent. To assess the relationship between GSTP1 gene Ile105Val polymorphism and its susceptibility to oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, a meta-analysis of previous studies was conducted.

METHODS

Two investigators independently searched studies published up to December 2012 from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. The pooled effect was calculated as odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed-effect or random-effect model.

RESULTS

Twelve prospective trials and two retrospective clinical trials involving 2,191 participants met the inclusion criteria. Combined analyses of these studies showed no significant associations between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, yielding OR of 1.08 (95 %CI 0.67-1.74, P = 0.754) in dominant model. Similar results were also obtained in recessive model (OR = 1.67, 95 %CI 0.56-4.93, P = 0.357) and allelic analysis (OR = 1.22, 95 %CI 0.67-2.24, P = 0.513). Since significant heterogeneity across studies, the pooled effects were calculated by random-effect model. No evidence of publication biases was identified in this meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism was related to the occurrence of neurotoxicity in oxaliplatin-treated patients. Given the limited number of studies and potential bias, large-scale and well-designed clinical trials should be needed to confirm these hypotheses.

Peripheral neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (XELOX): a prospective evaluation of 150 colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To report our prospective experience on the incidence and pattern of oxaliplatin (OXA)-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXA-IPN) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with either FOLFOX-4 or XELoda + OXaliplatin (XELOX).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty patients scheduled to be treated with either FOLFOX or XELOX for CRC were prospectively monitored at baseline and followed-up during chemotherapy. The incidence and severity of symptoms secondary to OXA-IPN were recorded using three different types of assessment, i.e. the motor and neurosensory National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria, version 3.0 (NCI-CTCv3), the clinical version of the total neuropathy score (TNSc) and electrophysiological scores.

RESULTS

Patients treated with either FOLFOX-4 or XELOX manifested similar incidence rates and severities of acute OXA-IPN. However, FOLFOX-4 was associated with increased incidence of chronic neurotoxicity, compared with XELOX-treated patients (n = 64/77 versus 44/73; P = 0.002), at a very similar OXA median cumulative dose during both regimens. Both the NCI-CTCv3 and TNSc demonstrated that the severity of cumulative OXA-IPN in FOLFOX-4-treated patients is higher than in those treated with XELOX.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of acute neurotoxicity during FOLFOX-4 therapy is similar to XELOX. However, it seems that FOLFOX-4 is more neurotoxic than XELOX in terms of cumulative OXA-IPN, despite comparable OXA cumulative dose.

Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin use in palliative and adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is frequently limited by cumulative neurotoxicity, leading to reduced quality of life and decreased dose. The mechanism of this neurotoxicity is unclear, but may relate to neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels involving calcium chelation by a metabolite of the drug. Various preventative measures have been tested to reduce the incidence of neurotoxicity, including calcium and magnesium infusions, dose interruption of the drug, and prophylactic neuromodulatory agents. Despite the promising efficacy of these measures, they are not universally accepted. Less is known about the best way to treat established neurotoxicity, which is permanent in some patients, although venlafaxine has shown promise in small clinical trials. This paper analyzes the extent, cause and risk factors for neuropathy, and the potential preventative and therapeutic treatments for oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in the era of pharmacogenomics

Development of advanced and high-throughput methods to study variability in human genes means we can now use pharmacogenomic analysis not only to predict response to treatment but also to assess the toxic action of drugs on normal cells (so-called toxicogenomics). This technological progress could enable us to identify individuals at high and low risk for a given side-effect. Pharmacogenomics could be very useful for stratification of cancer patients at risk of developing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity, one of the most severe and potentially permanent non-haematological side-effects of modern chemotherapeutic agents. However, study data reported so far are inconsistent, which suggests that methodological improvement is needed in clinical trials to obtain reliable results in this clinically relevant area.