Pegylated interferon-α2a in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma - a multicenter retrospective data analysis with 70 patients

BACKGROUND

Interferon-alpha is an important therapeutic option for the treatment of the cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Since the approved recombinant interferon-α-2a (IFN-α2a) has no longer been produced since January 2020, pegylated interferon-α2a (pegIFN-α2a) can be used as an alternative treatment, even though it is not approved for the treatment of CTCL. The aim of this multicentre study was to generate comprehensive data on the efficacy and tolerability of pegIFN-α2a in the treatment of CTCL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted with 70 patients with CTCL from twelve German skin centers.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients were included in the study, with 57.2% male and a mean age of 58.8 ± 14.9 years. Mycosis fungoides was present in 71.4% of cases and Sézary Syndrome in 28.6%. An overall response rate of 55.2% was observed with pegIFNα-2a therapy. In 50% of cases, therapy was discontinued after 63.6 ± 33.5 weeks. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events, which occurred in 68.6% of cases and which were classified as severe in 29.2%. Blood count changes, fatigue and liver toxicity occurred most frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis provides comprehensive data on the efficacy and tolerability of pegIFNα-2a therapy in patients with CTCL. In terms of response rates and side effect profile, pegIFNα-2a appears to be comparable to IFN-α2a therapy.

Real-world study of pegylated interferon α-2a to treat mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome using time to next treatment as a measure of clinical benefit: an EORTC CLTG study

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are chronic malignant diseases that typically necessitate diverse strategies to achieve remission. Systemic interferon (IFN)-α (subtypes 2a and 2b) has been used to treat MF/SS since 1984; however, its production was recently stopped. The recombinant pegylated (PEG) form of IFN-α-2a remains the only alternative IFN treatment, although it has not been approved for use in MF/SS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of PEG-IFN-α-2a in monotherapy and in combination with other treatments using time to next treatment (TTNT) as a measure of clinical therapeutic benefit in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We conducted an international, multicentre retrospective study of patients with MF and SS (of any stage) treated with PEG-IFN-α-2a from July 2012 to February 2022. Patients were included across 11 centres in 10 countries. The primary endpoints were to determine the TTNT of PEG-IFN-α-2a and adverse events (AEs) in MF/SS.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients were included [mean (SD) age 61 (13.1) years]; 42 (40.0%) had stage IA-IIA and 63 (60.0%) had stage IIB-IVB disease. PEG-IFN-α-2a was combined with other therapies in 67 (63.8%) patients, most commonly with extracorporeal photopheresis (36%) and bexarotene (22%). Patients with stage I-IIA disease achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 57%; the ORR in those with stage IIB-IVB disease was 51%. Combination treatment resulted in a median TTNT of 10.4 months (range 0.6-50.7) vs. 7.0 months (range 0.7-52.4) for those who received monotherapy (P < 0.01). Overall, the mean (SD) TTNT was 9.2 (10.6) months and the ORR was 53.3% (n = 56). A complete response was seen in 13% of patients and a partial response in 40%. AEs were described in 68.6% (n = 72) of patients. Flu-like symptoms (n = 28; 26.7%), lymphopenia (n = 24; 22.9%) and elevated liver function (n = 10; 9.5%) were the most frequently reported. Grade 3-4 AEs were reported in 23 (21.9%) patients, mostly related to myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG-IFN-α-2a for MF/SS resulted in an ORR of 53.3% and a mean (SD) TTNT of 9.2 (10.6) months. Combination regimens were superior to monotherapy and doses of 180 µg PEG-IFN-α-2a weekly were related to a higher ORR.

The efficacy of long-term psoralen plus ultraviolet A and low-dose interferon-a combination therapy in mycosis fungoides: A literature review

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Interferon (IFN)-a is often used in combination with psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) refractory to skin-targeted therapies in early or advanced stages. The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of combined PUVA and low-dose IFN-α-2a therapy in patients with early- and advanced-stage MF.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients who received a combination of PUVA twice or thrice a week and INF-a 3 MU thrice a week for at least 3 months were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment response was evaluated as complete remission (CR), partial remission, stable disease, or progression.

RESULTS

At the initiation, the majority of patients (66.2%) had early-stage disease. In 27.9% of cases, this was the initial treatment administered following the diagnosis of MF. The median duration of combination therapy was 11 months. Complete remission was achieved in 45.6% of the patients with an overall response rate of 60.3%. The mean duration of response was 5 months. Complete remission was statistically significantly higher in early-stage patients (p < .05). No statistically significant correlation was observed between CR and gender, histopathological features, or laboratory parameters. In patients with CR, 80% experienced relapse, significantly higher in early-stage patients (p < .05). However, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival between early and advanced stages (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study results indicated that PUVA + low-dose INF-a combination therapy was more effective in the early stage than in the advanced stage. Additionally, there was a high relapse rate after the cessation of treatment in patients who achieved CR.

Transitioning to Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Meeting the Challenge of Therapy Discontinuation and a Proposed Algorithm

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is an uncommon non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by skin involvement, with the most recognized subtypes being mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). Interferon has been an established treatment for MF/SS since 1984 and is integrated into management guidelines internationally. In 2019, manufacturers abruptly discontinued interferon-α2b and interferon-α2a. Many alternative systemic therapies in MF/SS remain unfunded or unavailable in Canada, presenting a unique challenge. Although off-label use of pegylated interferon is a logical substitute, there are no established dosing guidelines and limited published experience. This case series provides a single-center experience on pegylated interferon-α2b for treatment of MF/SS, a suggested management algorithm, and a review of the literature. All patients identified in the Calgary Cutaneous Lymphoma Program with stage IIB–IVB MF/SS treated with interferon-α2b (4.5–9 MU/week) were switched to once weekly pegylated interferon (90 μg, 0.5 mL) between February and July 2021. Response was monitored using the mSWAT and SkinDex-29 tools. Eight patients were switched to pegylated interferon, with a median disease duration of 69 months (range: 8–275 months). Five out of eight patients remain on pegylated interferon, with the remainder having switched to preplanned therapies. Two patients required dose reduction due to side effects, including grade II anemia and mood changes. The remaining patients had normal laboratory investigations and no additional side effects. Uncommon lymphomas like MF/SS have limited treatment options, and the impact of abrupt product discontinuation is substantial. We propose a management algorithm for the transition of patients from interferon to pegylated interferon.

Phototherapy combined with systemic agents for mycosis fungoides

The choice of tactics for managing a patient with mycosis fungoides is determined by the stage of the disease. In the early stages of mycosis fungoides, a treatment approach using external therapy and various ultraviolet irradiation spectra (UVB-311 nm and PUVA therapy) is preferable. With insufficient efficiency and / or short remissions in some patients, it is possible to use combined methods in the early stages: PUVA therapy or UVB-311 nm therapy. in combination with systemic therapy, including interferon (IFN) 2b preparations, methotrexate and retinoids. The results of original studies demonstrate an increase in the overall response rate when combining PUVA therapy with IFN- or retinoids in patients with stages IB-IIB. The effectiveness of combined treatment regimens using UVB-311 nm remains insufficiently studied.

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: focus on the current treatment scenario

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders, characterized by infiltration of the skin by mature malignant T cells. Mycosis fungoides is the most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, accounting for more than 60% of cases. Mycosis fungoides in the early-stage is generally an indolent disease, progressing slowly from some patches or plaques to more widespread skin involvement. However, 20% to 25% of patients progress to advanced stages, with the development of skin tumors, extracutaneous spread and poor prognosis. Treatment modalities can be divided into two groups: skin-directed therapies and systemic therapies. Therapies targeting the skin include topical agents, phototherapy and radiotherapy. Systemic therapies include biological response modifiers, immunotherapies and chemotherapeutic agents. For early-stage mycosis fungoides, skin-directed therapies are preferred, to control the disease, improve symptoms and quality of life. When refractory or in advanced-stage disease, systemic treatment is necessary. In this article, the authors present a compilation of current treatment options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Australian clinical practice statement

Primary cutaneous lymphomas represent a heterogeneous group of T- and B-cell lymphomas with distinct clinical presentations, histopathologic features, treatment approaches and outcomes. The cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, which include mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, account for the majority of the cutaneous lymphomas. This Clinical Practice Statement is reflective of the current clinical practice in Australia. An expanded form of the Clinical Practice Statement (and updates), along with helpful patient resources and access to support groups, can be found at the following (http://www.australasianlymphomaalliance.org.au).

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.

A Rare Case of Erdheim-Chester Disease (Non-Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis) with Concurrent Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocyte disorder most commonly characterized by multifocal osteosclerotic lesions of the long bones demonstrating sheets of foamy histiocyte infiltrates on biopsy with or without histiocytic infiltration of extraskeletal tissues. ECD can be difficult to diagnose since it is a very rare disease that can affect many organ systems. Diagnosis is based on the pathologic evaluation of involved tissue interpreted within the clinical context. Patients who have the BRAF V600E mutation are treated first line with vemurafenib. For those without the mutation with symptomatic ECD, conventional or PEGylated interferon alpha is recommended. For patients who are either intolerant or nonresponsive to interferon alpha, systemic chemotherapy with or without corticosteroids can be used. We present a rare case of Erdheim-Chester disease with concurrent Langerhans cell histiocytosis which occurs in only one fifth of the cases and often presents as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Dose-escalation study evaluating pegylated interferon alpha-2a in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

This open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous pegylated (40 kD) interferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PEG-IFN α-2a was administered subcutaneously at 180 (n = 4), 270 (n = 6), or 360 μg (n = 3) once weekly for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

RESULTS

PEG-IFN α-2a was generally well tolerated, with a moderate number of reductions or withholding of doses because of adverse events (AEs) (25% (n = 1), 66% (n = 4), and 0% (n = 0) in the 180-, 270-, and 360-μg/week groups, respectively). The only dose-limiting toxicity was a grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes in the 270-μg dose group. The most common AEs were fatigue, acute flu-like symptoms, and hepatic toxicity. The major response rate (CR or PR) was 50% in the 180-μg group (CR, 50%; PR, 0%), 83% in the 270-μg group (CR, 67%; PR, 17%), and 66% in the 360-μg group (CR, 33%; PR, 33%).

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN α-2a at doses up to 360 μg once weekly was well tolerated in patients with CTCL up to the highest dose group and showed good response rates. Due to their good tolerance even in high doses, they might be an option for patients not tolerating standard IFN-α preparations. However, for this purpose and to evaluate comparability between standard and PEG-IFN larger clinical trials are needed, alone and in combination with oral photochemotherapy (PUVA).

Guidelines for phototherapy of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: A consensus statement of the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet light (UVL) is a long established treatment for mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Treatments have traditionally included broadband, narrowband ultraviolet B light (UVB) and psoralen plus ultraviolet A light photochemotherapy (PUVA), but more recently, treatment options have expanded to include UVA1 and excimer laser. UVL is used either as monotherapy or as an adjuvant to systemic therapy, demonstrating efficacy in many cases that equal or surpass systemic medications. Despite its utility and duration of use, the current practice of using UVL guidelines for psoriasis to treat patients with MF/SS is problematic because the goals of prolonging survival and preventing disease progression are unique to CTCL compared to psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to develop separate guidelines for phototherapy for MF/SS for both clinical practice and for clinical trials.

METHODS

Literature review and cutaneous lymphoma expert consensus group recommendations.

RESULTS

This paper reviews the published literature for UVB and UVA/PUVA in MF/SS and suggests practical standardized guidelines for their use.

LIMITATIONS

New standardization of phototherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines should allow the comparison of results with phototherapy in MF/SS across different stages of patients, centers, and in combination with other agents in practice and in clinical trials.

The Use of Interferons in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Interferons are polypeptides that naturally occur in the human body as a part of the innate immune response. By harnessing these immunomodulatory functions, synthetic interferons have shown efficacy in combating various diseases including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. This article closely examines the qualities of interferon alfa and interferon gamma and the evidence behind their use in the 2 most common types of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, namely, mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Erdheim-Chester disease: characteristics and management

Erdheim-Chester disease is a rare CD68(+), CD1a(-) non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis with multiorgan involvement. The etiology of Erdheim-Chester disease is unclear; there are no known associated infectious or hereditary genetic abnormalities. However, somatic BRAF mutations have recently been identified in these patients. Historically, the literature regarding the management of Erdheim-Chester disease consisted of case reports and small case series with anecdotal therapeutic responses to agents including, but not limited to, cytotoxic chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, cladribine, corticosteroids, IFN-α, the BCR-ABL/KIT inhibitor imatinib mesylate, the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra, the TNF-inhibitor infliximab, and recently the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. We performed a search of the literature using PubMed with the terms Erdheim Chester disease, without date limitations, including case reports, case series, original articles, and previous review articles. In the absence of large-scale studies, experience-based management prevails. The present review details our approach to the management of patients with Erdheim-Chester disease.

Systematic review of combination therapies for mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

A variety of therapeutic options are available for mycosis fungoides, the most prevalent subtype of cutaneous T cell lymphomas, but thus far, no regimen has been proven to be curative. A combination of treatments is a well-established strategy to increase the therapeutic efficacy. However, data from clinical trials analyzing such combinations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the available evidence on combination therapies with emphasis on the combination of psoralen with UVA phototherapy (PUVA), interferon-alpha and bexarotene with another treatment.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of the databases Embase, Cochrane, Medline, and Medline in Process.

RESULTS

Combination of PUVA with interferon-alpha or retinoids did not result in an increased overall response rate. Addition of methotrexate but not retinoids to interferon-alpha may increase the overall response rate. Bexarotene was investigated in one trial each with vorinostat, methotrexate or gemcitabine, whereby only methotrexate possibly enhanced the effect of bexarotene.

CONCLUSION

For mycosis fungoides, no combination treatment has been demonstrated to be superior to monotherapy. Based on our analysis, we conclude that in certain clinical situations, patients may benefit from a combination of PUVA with interferon-alpha or a retinoid or a combination of the latter two. Furthermore, patients in advanced stages may benefit from the combination of methotrexate and interferon-alpha or bexarotene. Finally, the combination of bexarotene with either vorinostat or gemcitabine did not increase the overall response rate but resulted in more pronounced side effects and cannot be recommended.