Children with the fragile X chromosome at schools for the mildly mentally retarded

Fragile X syndrome. I. An overview on its genetic mechanism

A large body of literature has accumulated within the last decade concerning the fragile X syndrome, the most common cause of X-linked mental retardation. The first article of this review summarizes the peculiar genetic mechanisms and molecular biology properties (eg, unstable DNA triplet repeats), which have been characterized since the detection of the FMR-1 gene in 1991. However, the most important question concerning the function of the FMR-1 gene is still an unresolved issue and is in need of future research. The second article of this review addresses the clinical picture, neuropsychological functioning and psychopathological characteristics of pre- and full mutation carriers.

Evaluation of school children at high risk for fragile X syndrome utilizing buccal cell FMR-1 testing

We describe a pilot project utilizing saliva to identify the FMR-1 mutation in high-risk special education students from four public school districts in Colorado. The program included presentations to special education teachers regarding fragile X syndrome, parental consent for testing, completion of a behavior checklist by the teachers, identification of special education students at high risk for fragile X syndrome, subsequent brief examination of face and hands, collection of a saliva sample by either Gatorade swish or brushing of the inside of the cheek, and analysis for the FMR-1 mutation by PCR. Equivocal samples were studied by direct DNA testing using Southern blot analysis, and abnormal results were confirmed by a blood analysis for the FMR-1 mutation. Mutant individuals received genetic counseling and medical and educational assessments to optimize treatment and intervention. This pilot project was met with enthusiasm by the schools. Of the first 439 students evaluated, 68% were male with an average age of 7.75 years; 13% were mentally retarded or autistic. Most students referred for the evaluation were learning disabled (51%) and/or had an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (35%). The overall prevalence of the FMR-1 mutation was 5 of 439 or 1.1%. This relatively low yield is probably due to the high number of non-retarded but learning disabled students tested. Of the mentally retarded patients tested, 3.5% were positive for the FMR-1 mutation; however, of the non-retarded or learning disabled patients, only 0.79% were FMR-1 positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The fragile-X syndrome. On the way to a behavioural phenotype

The fragile-X syndrome accounts for up to 10% of individuals with mental handicap, and 50% of cases of X-linked mental retardation. Knowledge of the genetic basis of mental functioning, psychopathology, and neuropsychology is being furthered by this recently recognised condition. The disorder has considerable significance for psychiatrists, particularly, but by no means exclusively, those working in the field of mental handicap and with children. This review outlines the slow clarification of this complex and important behavioural phenotype and the implications of these advances for identification, diagnosis, genetic counselling and a wide range of management interventions.

Fragile X frequency in a mentally retarded population in Brazil

Seventy-five male and 50 female students from 2 special schools for mildly, moderately retarded, or borderline individuals were screened clinically and cytogenetically in order to estimate the contribution of fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome to the cause of mental retardation in Brazil. We found 6 males (8%) from 4 families and 2 unrelated females (4%) with fra(X) chromosomes. One male and one female were isolated cases. The estimated frequency of Martin-Bell [fra(X)] syndrome among mentally impaired individuals in Brazil was similar to that previously reported in other countries.

The recurrence risks for mild idiopathic mental retardation

A genetic study of children attending ESN(M) schools in Coventry has shown a recurrence risk of idiopathic mental retardation in sibs lying between 1 in 4 and 1 in 5. There was also a prevalence of mental retardation in other relatives that was greater than the population prevalence, and was less for second degree relatives than for first degree, and less still for third degree relatives. Recurrence in sibs was greater if more than one first degree relative was affected. There was no suggestion of a contribution by X linked genes, once the fragile X syndrome had been excluded. The presence of perinatal and other environmental factors in the index children did not alter the recurrence risk for sibs except for very low birth weight. There was a low recurrence rate of mental retardation in Asian families, suggesting that they had a different distribution of intelligence from non-Asian families.