A comparison of the effects of four intravenous solutions for the treatment of ketonuria during labour

Intravenous fluid rate of 250 mL/h versus 125 mL/h in nulliparous women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the type and rate of intravenous (IV) fluid administration during labor is still inconclusive and the studies assessing the impact of IV fluids had mixed results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of IV fluids at an infusion rate of 250 mL/h as compared with 125 mL/h on labor outcomes in nulliparous women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched six databases for relevant studies through a search strategy containing the relevant keywords "IV hydration", "IV fluids", and "labor" from the inception of these databases to May 1, 2023, without any applied restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Search results were imported to Covidence for screening of eligible articles for this review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of IV fluids at 250 mL/h on the outcomes of labor in nulliparous women at term (>37 weeks) as compared with 125 mL/h were included only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding the characteristics of included studies, participant's baseline characteristics, and concerned outcomes were collected in an Excel spreadsheet and all the concerned outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the meta-analysis models using RevMan 5.4.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 11 RCTs with 1815 patients showed that 250 mL/h infusion rate had a significant reduction in cesarean section rate (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.88, P = 0.002), the first stage of labor duration (MD -46.97, 95% CI -81.79 to -12.14, P = 0.008), the second stage of labor duration (MD -2.69, 95% CI -4.34 to -1.05, P = 0.001), prolonged labor incidence (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, P = 0.003), as compared with 125 mL/h. Also, the vaginal delivery rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = 0.009) was higher with a 250 mL/h infusion rate.

CONCLUSION

IV fluids at an infusion rate of 250 mL/h during labor in nulliparous women decreased the cesarean delivery rate, increased the vaginal delivery rate, shortened the first and second-stage labor duration, decreased the incidence of prolonged labor as compared with 125 mL/h. These findings suggest enhanced labor progression and a lower risk of labor complications with higher infusion rates. However, future research involving a more diverse population and exploring the potential benefits of combining IV infusion rates with other interventions, such as adding dextrose or less restrictive oral intake during labor, is needed.

Effect of Oral Carbohydrate Intake During Labor on the Rate of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate intake during physical exercise improves muscle performance and decreases fatigue. We hypothesized that carbohydrate intake during labor, which is a period of significant physical activity, can decrease the instrumental vaginal delivery rate.

METHODS

In a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, healthy adult pregnant women presenting with spontaneous labor were assigned to a "Carbohydrate" group (advised to drink 200 mL of apple or grape juice without pulp every 3 hours) or a "Fasting" group (water only). The primary outcome was the instrumental vaginal delivery rate. Secondary outcomes included duration of labor, rate of cesarean delivery, evaluation of maternal hunger, thirst, stress, fatigue, and overall feeling during labor by numeric rating scale (0 worst rating to 10 best rating), rate of vomiting, and hospital length of stay. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome was tested with the "Fasting" group as the reference group. The P values for secondary outcomes were adjusted for multiple comparisons. The differences between groups are reported with 99% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 3984 women were analyzed (2014 in the Carbohydrate group and 1970 in the Fasting group). There was no difference in the rate of instrumental delivery between the Carbohydrate (21.0%) and the Fasting (22.4%) groups (difference, -1.4%; 99% CI, -4.9 to 2.2). No differences were found between the Carbohydrate and the Fasting groups for the duration of labor (difference, -7 minutes; 99% CI, -25 to 11), the rate of cesarean delivery (difference, -0.3%; 99% CI, -2.4 to 3.0), the rate of vomiting (difference, 2.8%; 99% CI, 0.2-5.7), the degree of self-reported fatigue (difference, 1; 99% CI, 0-2), self-reported hunger (difference, 0; 99% CI, -1 to 1), thirst (difference, 0; 99% CI, -1 to 1), stress (difference, 0; 99% CI, -1 to 1), overall feeling (difference, 0; 99% CI, 0-0), and the length of hospitalization (difference, 0; 99% CI, -1 to 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Carbohydrate intake during labor did not modify the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery.

The effects of intravenous dextrose 5%, Ringer's solution, and oral intake on the duration of labor stages in nulliparous women: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Background and objectives: Childbirth consists of a three-stage period beginning with uterine contractions and ending in the expulsion of the placenta. The present study was conducted to compare the effects of Ringer's solution, dextrose solution 5%, and oral intake on the duration of total labor and labor stages (primary outcome) and the frequency of oxytocin administration and prolonged labor (secondary outcome) in nulliparous women with spontaneous vaginal delivery.Materials and methods: The present randomized clinical trial was conducted on 201 nulliparous women in labor assigned with a randomized block design to three groups, each receiving either Ringer's solution plus oral fluids, dextrose solution 5% solution plus oral fluids or oral fluids alone. The solutions were intravenously administered at a rate of 125 ml/h in the groups receiving the solutions and the subjects in the oral fluids group could consume liquids of their choice (water, orange juice, and apple juice). The duration of total labor and labor stages (the active stage, the second, and third stages of labor) were recorded by the researcher in minutes. Furthermore, the frequency of oxytocin administration and prolonged labor were recorded by the researcher by using a checklist. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney's U-test, chi- square test and Fisher exact test.Results: The mean (±SD) duration of total labor was 301.2 (±50.0) minutes in the Ringer group, 171.9 (±36.4) in the dextrose 5% group, and 524.8 (±103.4) in the oral fluids group, suggesting a statistically significant intergroup difference (p < .001). The mean (±SD) duration of the active stage of labor was 276.7 (±91.3) minutes in the Ringer group, 150.6 (±78.5) in the dextrose 5% group, and 302.4 (±136.8) in the oral fluids group, suggesting a statistically significant intergroup difference (p < .001). A significant difference was also observed between the three groups in terms of the duration of the third stage of labor (p < .001); however, no significant differences were observed in terms of the duration of the second stage of labor (p = .058). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed between the three groups in terms of the need for oxytocin administration (p ≤ .001) and the frequency of prolonged labor (p = .001).Conclusion: The results suggest that the consumption of dextrose solution by nulliparous women reduces the duration of labor, the need for oxytocin administration and the frequency of prolonged labor compared to when Ringer's solution and oral fluids are used.

Dextrose intravenous fluid therapy in labor reduces the length of the first stage of labor

The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect on length of labor when patients receive IVF with or without dextrose. Searches were performed in electronic databases from inception of each database to May 2018. Trials comparing intrapartum IVF containing dextrose (i.e. intervention group) with no dextrose or placebo (i.e. control group) were included. Only trials examining low-risk pregnancies in labor at ≥36 weeks were included. Studies were included regardless of oral intake restriction. The primary outcome was the length of total labor from randomization to delivery. The meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. Sixteen trials (n = 2503 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Women randomized in the IVF dextrose group did not have a statistically significant different length of total labor from randomization to delivery compared to IVF without dextrose (MD -38.33 min, 95% CI -88.23 to 11.57). IVF with dextrose decreased the length of the first stage (MD -75.81 min, 95% CI -120.67 to -30.95), but there was no change in the second stage. In summary, use of IVF with dextrose during labor in low-risk women at term does not affect total length of labor, but it does shorten the first stage of labor.

Intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women

BACKGROUND

Several factors may influence the progression of normal labour. It has been postulated that the routine administration of intravenous fluids to keep women adequately hydrated during labour may reduce the period of contraction and relaxation of the uterine muscle, and may ultimately reduce the duration of the labour. It has also been suggested that intravenous fluids may reduce caesarean sections (CS) for prolonged labour. However, the routine administration of intravenous fluids to labouring women has not been adequately elucidated although it is a widely-adopted policy, and there is no consensus on the type or volume of fluids that are required, or indeed, whether intravenous fluids are at all necessary. Women may be able to adequately hydrate themselves if they were allowed oral fluids during labour.Furthermore, excessive volumes of intravenous fluids may pose risks to both the mother and her newborn and different fluids are associated with different risks.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the routine administration of intravenous fluids to low-risk nulliparous labouring women reduces the duration of labour and to evaluate the safety of intravenous fluids on maternal and neonatal health.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 February 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid administration to spontaneously labouring low-risk nulliparous women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine randomised trials with 1781 women. Three trials had more than two treatment arms and were included in more than one comparison.Two trials compared women randomised to receive up to 250 mL/hour of Ringer's lactate solution as well as oral intake versus oral intake only. For women delivering vaginally, there was a reduction in the duration of labour in the Ringer's lactate group (mean difference (MD) -28.86 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -47.41 to -10.30). There was no statistical reduction in the number of CS in the Ringer's lactate group (risk ratio (RR), 0.73 95% CI 0.49 to 1.08).Three trials compared women who received 125 mL/hour versus 250 mL/hour of intravenous fluids with free oral fluids in both groups. Women receiving a greater hourly volume of intravenous fluids (250 mL) had shorter labours than those receiving 125 mL (MD 23.87 minutes, 95% CI 3.72 to 44.02, 256 women). There was no statistically significant reduction in the number of CS in the 250 mL intravenous fluid group (average RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.54 to1.87, three studies, 334 women). In one study the number of assisted vaginal deliveries was lower in the group receiving 125 mL/hour (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81).Four trials compared rates of intravenous fluids in women where oral intake was restricted (125 mL/hour versus 250 mL/hour). There was a reduction in the duration of labour in women who received the higher infusion rate (MD 105.61 minutes, 95% CI 53.19 to 158.02); P < 0.0001, however, findings must be interpreted with caution as there was high heterogeneity amongst trials (I(2) = 53%). There was a significant reduction in CS in women receiving the higher rate of intravenous fluid infusion (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.21; P = 0.01). There was no difference identified in the assisted delivery rate (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.40). There was no clear difference between groups in the number of babies admitted to the NICU (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.17).Two trials compared normal saline versus 5% dextrose. Only one reported the mean duration of labour, and there was no strong evidence of a difference between groups (MD -12.00, 95% CI -30.09 to 6.09). A trial reporting the median suggested that the duration was reduced in the dextrose group. There was no significant difference in CS or assisted deliveries (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.43, two studies, 284 women) and (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.63, one study, 93 women) respectively. Only one trial reported on maternal hyponatraemia (serum sodium levels < 135 mmol/L ). For neonatal complications, there was no difference in the admission to NICU) or in low Apgar scores, however 33.3% of babies developed hyponatraemia in the dextrose group compared to 13.3 % in the normal saline group (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.93) (P = 0.03). One trial reported a higher incidence of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia in the dextrose group of babies. There was no difference in neonatal hypoglycaemic episodes between groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the administration of intravenous fluids compared with oral intake alone demonstrated a reduction in the duration of labour, this finding emerged from only two trials. The findings of other trials suggest that if a policy of no oral intake is applied, then the duration of labour in nulliparous women may be shortened by the administration of intravenous fluids at a rate of 250 mL/hour rather than 125 mL/hour. However, it may be possible for women to simply increase their oral intake rather than being attached to a drip and we have to consider whether it is justifiable to persist with a policy of 'nil by mouth'. One trial raised concerns about the safety of dextrose and this needs further exploration.None of the trials reported on the evaluation of maternal views of being attached to a drip during their entire labour. Furthermore, there was no objective assessment of dehydration. The evidence from this review does not provide robust evidence to recommend routine administration of intravenous fluids. Interpreting the results from trials was hampered by the low number of trials contributing data and by variation between trials. In trials where oral fluids were not restricted there was considerable variation in the amount of oral fluid consumed by women in different arms of the same trial, and between different trials. In addition, results from trials were not consistent and risk of bias varied. Some important research questions were addressed by single trials only, and important outcomes relating to maternal and infant morbidity were frequently not reported.

Oxidant balance markers at birth in relation to glycemic and acid-base parameters

In diabetic pregnancies, suboptimal glycemic control is a risk factor for fetal acidemia and stillbirth. We hypothesized that the diabetic intrauterine milieu (hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, changes in acid-base status) might predispose to oxidative stress. We studied 70 newborns whose mothers had pregestational diabetes (58 with type 1 diabetes mellitus) and 71 control newborns from nondiabetic mothers. Protein carbonyls (PCs), malondialdehyde, and 8-hydroxy-2'deoxyguanosine were measured in umbilical vein plasma as a reflection of protein, lipid, and DNA oxidative damage, respectively; glutathione peroxidase-3 (GPx3), an important circulating antioxidant enzyme, was also assayed. Despite satisfactory glycemic control in the majority of diabetic mothers, their newborns showed higher birth weight and relative hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and respiratory acidemia. The oxidant balance marker concentrations were not different at the P < .05 level between the 2 groups, and there was no relationship to maternal hemoglobin A(₁C) levels in the diabetic group. However, in the entire sample, increasing glucose levels at birth were related to lower GPx3 and higher PC concentrations; and GPx3 and PC concentrations were inversely correlated. In addition, a depressed pH or larger base-deficit at birth was related to higher PC and 8-hydroxy-2'deoxyguanosine concentrations. In conclusion, oxidant balance markers at birth are not affected by maternal diabetes per se and its long-term glycemic control, yet some markers are acutely tuned to metabolic cues including glucose and the acid-base environment.

A randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial comparing parenteral normal saline with and without dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare intravenous normal saline with and without dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparae.

STUDY DESIGN

In a double-blinded, controlled trial, term, nulliparae with singletons in active labor were randomized into 1 of 3 groups receiving either normal saline (NS), NS with 5% dextrose (D5NS), or NS with 10% dextrose (D10NS) at 125 mL/h. The primary outcome was total length of labor from onset of study fluid in vaginally delivered subjects. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 300 subjects enrolled, 289 met inclusion criteria and completed the study. In vaginally delivered subjects, significant differences were noted in the second stage (P = .01) and total length of labor (P = .02). No significant differences were observed in the cesarean section rates between the groups (P = .21). No differences were noted in maternal or neonatal secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a dextrose solution, regardless of concentration, was associated with a shortened labor course in term vaginally delivered nulliparae subjects in active labor.

Interventions for ketosis during labour

BACKGROUND

In labour, ketosis (the elevation of ketone bodies in the blood) is a common occurrence, due to increased physical stress, which is often compounded by reduced oral intake. The effect of ketosis on the mother and baby during labour is not clear, therefore, there is uncertainty as to whether ketosis is a normal physiological response or whether women with ketosis in labour require intervention (such as intravenous fluids or increased oral intake) for maternal and infant wellbeing. This uncertainty has resulted in differences in opinion and practice by those providing care for women in labour.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of intravenous fluids or increased oral intake administered to women in labour for the treatment of ketosis compared with no intervention (defined as no oral intake, ice chips only, or oral intake on demand) and to also assess the effects of different types of intravenous fluids administered.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2007), EMBASE (1988 to January 2007) and CINAHL (1982 to 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published and unpublished randomised trials in which additional oral intake or intravenous fluids, or both, were used for the treatment of women with ketosis in labour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed potentially eligible trials. The authors sought additional information on trial methods and outcome data to enable consideration of eligibility of studies. However, at the time of the review, no information was received.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six trials as potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. All six studies were excluded. Therefore no trials are included in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no information on which to base practice in the treatment of women with ketosis during labour. Further research is required to identify more clearly the association between ketosis in labour and pregnancy outcome. Future trials should examine the effects of no interventions and different types of intravenous and oral fluids on these clinically important outcomes, and include women's perception and satisfaction with care during labour and birth.

Carbohydrate solution intake during labour just before the start of the second stage: a double-blind study on metabolic effects and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of oral carbohydrate ingestion on clinical outcome and on maternal and fetal metabolism.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomised study.

SETTING

Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.

POPULATION

Two hundred and two nulliparous women.

METHODS

In labour, at 8 to 10 cm of cervical dilatation, the women were asked to drink a solution containing either 25 g carbohydrates or placebo. In a subgroup of 28 women, metabolic parameters were measured.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of instrumental deliveries, fetal and maternal glucose, free fatty acids, lactate, pH, Pco2, base excess/deficit and beta-hydroxybutyrate.

RESULTS

Drinking a carbohydrate-enriched solution just before starting the second stage of labour did not reduce instrumental delivery rate (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.3). Caesarean section rate was lower in the carbohydrate group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (1% vs 7%, RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-1.2). In the carbohydrate group, maternal free fatty acids decreased and the lactate increased. In the umbilical cord there was a positive venous-arterial lactate difference in the carbohydrate group and a negative one in the placebo group, but the differences in pH and base deficit were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Intake of carbohydrates just before the second stage does not reduce instrumental delivery rate. The venous-arterial difference in the umbilical cord suggested lactate transport to the fetal circulation but did not result in fetal acidaemia.

The effects of oral carbohydrate administration on fetal acid base balance

AIMS

Little evidence-based data are available on the effects of eating and drinking during labor. Intravenous glucose administration has been related to fetal metabolic acidosis. The question is, whether oral intake of carbohydrates effects the fetal acid-base balance.

METHODS

In a double blind, prospective placebo controlled study 100 nulliparous women were randomized at 8-10 cm of cervical dilatation. All women were asked to drink 200 cc of either a carbohydrate solution (containing 25 grams carbohydrates) or placebo. In all women, both arterial and venous umbilical cord pH, pCO2, pO2, HCO3- and base excess/deficit were assessed. In a subgroup of women, whose deliveries were complicated by mild signs of fetal distress, clinical outcome and acid-base status was described separately.

RESULTS

Fetal arterial umbilical cord pH were identical: 7.20 +/- 0.07 in the placebo group and 7.20 +/- 0.08 in the carbohydrate group and the base excess -6.6 +/- 2.8 versus 6.6 +/- 3.7. In the women with mild signs of fetal distress, no differences were observed as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral carbohydrate intake during labor seems to be safe regarding the fetal acid-base balance. Further study on the maternal and fetal metabolic parameters is essential to give a more complete picture.

NPO during labor. Is there any scientific validation?

Maternal death from pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has virtually disappeared in the United Kingdom. The one case documented in the most recent triennial report was a woman with multiorgan failure in intensive care and is probably not relevant to the current debate [1]. Although not so well documented, other Western countries seem to be experiencing the same decline in maternal death from this cause. At the same time, the burden of proof is falling increasingly on obstetric anesthesiologists as obstetricians and midwives demand that NPO policies should be rejected, unless anesthesiologists can prove that they are necessary. Without any proof of benefit, many midwives actively encourage eating in women who do not really want to eat. A hospital manager who wants to divert money to other areas of health care might make the same argument about employing less experienced--and therefore cheaper--anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists on the labor floor. Although no self-respecting obstetric anesthesiologist would accept such a situation, there is still no randomized controlled trial that proves that experienced anesthesiologists reduce maternal mortality. Similarly it is difficult for a mother to comprehend the negligible risk of pulmonary aspiration during labor while her care providers insist that it would be more dangerous for her to cross a busy road! Against a background of conflicting advice from midwives and medical practitioners, the mother is likely to eat if she feels so inclined. Pulmonary aspiration is a rare complication, so even if a light diet in labor became acceptable, it is likely that it would take many years for a subsequent increase in maternal mortality to become apparent. It would be disappointing if mistakes made by a previous generation had to be relearned in the twenty-first century. Increasingly, media-controlled pressure groups dictate health fashions, and the physicians frequently can only stand on the sidelines and advise. Most obstetric anesthesiologists agree that a rigid NPO policy in labor is no longer appropriate and that at least water or ice chips should be allowed. Current evidence suggests that solids and semi-solids should be avoided once a woman is in active labor or requests analgesia. The appropriate advice is to allow a carefully audited introduction of isotonic drinks. These drinks seem to be an effective medium for providing calories while minimizing any increase in gastric volume, and such a policy would be unlikely to reverse the reduction in aspiration that has been achieved over the past 50 years.

Intravenous therapy for women in labor: implementation of a practice change

BACKGROUND

Intravenous therapy for women in labor has been routinely administered in many North American hospitals since the 1950s. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a change in intravenous therapy practice.

METHODS

The evaluation study, using a posttest, quasi-experimental design, examined the responses of women in labor and nurses to a questionnaire. Proxy prestudy cohort data were used for comparison of some patient outcomes. The convenience sample comprised 219 women admitted to the labor and delivery unit of a community hospital in Toronto, Ontario, between August and October 1997.

RESULTS

Under the new intravenous therapy protocol, 26 percent of the women in labor did not receive intravenous therapy compared with 100 percent under the old protocol. The primary reasons for therapy were to enable administration of prescribed medication and bolus intravenous administration associated with epidural anesthesia. At the first after-delivery void, 61 percent of study women-65 percent of those who received intravenous therapy and 50 percent of those who received no intravenous therapy-tested negative for ketonuria. All 119 comments from nurses indicated comfort with their judgments related to the initiation of intravenous therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in the intravenous therapy protocol was supported by the study findings. Nurses should increase patient education about drinking and eating adequately throughout labor if appropriate, and resuming adequate fluid and food intake as quickly as possible after childbirth.

Fetal monitoring with lactate

Lactate is a metabolite that can safely and easily can be determined in fetal scalp blood using new microvolume (5-20 microliters) lactate meters. However, new lactate analysing methods need their own reference values. There are factors other than hypoxia that might increase fetal lactate levels, although this does not disqualify this parameter for intrapartum surveillance. Available data on fetal lactate determination give support that it can simplify FBS in labour and is likely to predict fetal tissue hypoxia at least as well as is pH determination. Prospective randomized studies are needed before the method can be introduced into clinical practice. As a predictor of neonatal outcome, lactate can substitute pH in routine assessment of cord artery blood at delivery.

Maternal and newborn levels of glucose, sodium and osmolality after preloading with three intravenous solutions during elective cesarean sections

The influence of maternal i.v. loading with 1500 ml fluid prior to epidural anesthesia and elective cesarean section was studied in 60 healthy parturients near term. Three different solutions were used. Normal saline 0.9%, Hartmann's solution and dextrose 5%. A significant rise in glucose level accompanied by a significant decrease in sodium level was found in mothers and newborns of the group hydrated with the dextrose solution.