A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to ultrasonic fetal measurement in the third trimester

Race and geography impact validity of maximum allowable standing height equations for para-athletes

World Athletics use maximum allowable standing height (MASH) equations for para-athletes with bilateral lower extremity amputations to estimate stature and limit prosthesis length since longer prostheses can provide running performance advantages. The equations were developed using a white Spanish population; however, validation for other races and geographical groups is limited. This study aimed to determine the validity of the MASH equations for Black and white Americans and whether bias errors between calculated and measured stature were similar between these populations. Sitting height, thigh length, upper arm length, forearm length, and arm span of 1899 male and 1127 female Black and white Americans from the Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel database were input into the 6 sex-specific MASH equations to enable comparisons of calculated and measured statures within and between Black and white groups. Two of 12 MASH equations validly calculated stature for Black Americans and 3 of 12 equations were valid for white Americans. Bias errors indicated greater underestimation or lesser overestimation of calculated statures in 10 equations for Black compared to white Americans and in 2 equations for white compared to Black Americans. This study illustrates that race and geography impact the validity of MASH equations.

Comparison Study of Low-Cost Ultrasound Devices for Estimation of Gestational Age in Resource-Limited Countries

We investigated how accurately low-cost ultrasound devices can estimate gestational age (GA) using both the standard plane and the obstetric sweep protocol (OSP). The OSP can be taught to health care workers without prior knowledge of ultrasound within one day and thus avoid the need to train dedicated sonographers. Three low-cost ultrasound devices were compared with one high-end ultrasound device. GA was estimated with the head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) using both the standard plane and the OSP. The results revealed that the HC, AC and FL can be used to estimate GA using low-cost ultrasound devices in the standard plane within the inter-observer variability presented in the literature. The OSP can be used to estimate GA by measuring the HC and the AC, but not the FL. This study shows that it is feasible to estimate GA in resource-limited countries with low-cost ultrasound devices using the OSP. This makes it possible to estimate GA and assess fetal growth for pregnant women in rural areas of resource-limited countries.

Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

OBJECTIVE

To assess a comprehensive package of ultrasound quality control in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21^st Project, a large multicenter study of fetal growth.

METHODS

Quality control (QC) measures were performed for 20 313 ultrasound scan images obtained prospectively from 4321 fetuses at 14-41 weeks' gestation in eight geographical locations. At the time of each ultrasound examination, three fetal biometric variables (head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL)) were measured in triplicate on separately generated images. All measurements were taken in a blinded fashion. QC had two elements: (1) qualitative QC: visual assessment by sonographers at each study site of their images based on specific criteria, with 10% of images being re-assessed at the Oxford-based Ultrasound Quality Unit (compared using an adjusted kappa statistic); and (2) quantitative QC: assessment of measurement data by comparing the first, second and third measurements (intraobserver variability), remeasurement of caliper replacement in 10% (interobserver variability), both by Bland-Altman plots and plotting frequency histograms of the SD of triplicate measurements and assessing how many were above or below 2 SD of the expected distribution. The system allowed the sonographers' performances to be monitored regularly.

RESULTS

A high level of agreement between self- and external scoring was demonstrated for all measurements (κ = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99) for HC, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) for AC and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) for FL). Intraobserver 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ultrasound measures for HC, AC and FL were ± 3.3%, ± 5.6% and ± 6.2%, respectively; the corresponding values for interobserver LoA were ± 4.4%, ± 6.0% and ± 5.6%. The SD distribution of triplicate measurements for all biometric variables showed excessive variability for three of 31 sonographers, allowing prompt identification and retraining.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative and quantitative QC monitoring was feasible and highly reproducible in a large multicenter research study, which facilitated the production of high-quality ultrasound images. We recommend that the QC system we developed is implemented in future research studies and clinical practice. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome

Clinical decisions are often based on the results of third trimester sonograms, particularly with small or large babies and so accuracy of estimating fetal weight (EFW) is essential. There are numerous EFW formula available and yet in Australia no one formula has been recommended for use due to the lack of clinical evidence as to their accuracy. Objectives: 1 To assess inter/intra observer error for fetal parameter measurements with multiple observers. 2 To compare six of the most commonly used EFW formulae and analyse inter/intra formulae variations for different weight range. Method: EFW of 121 pregnancies assessed within 7 days of birth by measuring the BPD, OFD, HC, AC, FL and comparing to actual birth weight. Results: Inter-observer error: 1.3 to 3.1%. Intra-observer error: 1.1 to 1.9% depending on fetal parameter. Accuracy of each EFW formula changed with different weight ranges. For all formulae the highest random error occurred in the macrosomic group. The lowest random error in all weight groups was the Hadlock B formula incorporating the HC/AC/FL (7.7%). Conclusion: Considering the possible problems of head moulding this study suggests the use of: Hadlock FP et al (1982) - Formula B - incorporating HC/AC/FL.

Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements

OBJECTIVE

To assess intra- and interobserver variability of fetal biometry measurements throughout pregnancy.

METHODS

A total of 175 scans (of 140 fetuses) were prospectively performed at 14-41 weeks of gestation ensuring an even distribution throughout gestation. From among three experienced sonographers, a pair of observers independently acquired a duplicate set of seven standard measurements for each fetus. Differences between and within observers were expressed in measurement units (mm), as a percentage of fetal dimensions and as gestational age-specific Z-scores. For all comparisons, Bland-Altman plots were used to quantify limits of agreement.

RESULTS

When using measurement units (mm) to express differences, both intra- and interobserver variability increased with gestational age. However, when measurement of variability took into account the increasing fetal size and was expressed as a percentage or Z-score, it remained constant throughout gestation. When expressed as a percentage or Z-score, the 95% limits of agreement for intraobserver difference for head circumference (HC) were ± 3.0% or 0.67; they were ± 5.3% or 0.90 and ± 6.6% or 0.94 for abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), respectively. The corresponding values for interobserver differences were ± 4.9% or 0.99 for HC, ± 8.8% or 1.35 for AC and ± 11.1% or 1.43 for FL.

CONCLUSIONS

Although intra- and interobserver variability increases with advancing gestation when expressed in millimeters, both are constant as a percentage of the fetal dimensions or when reported as a Z-score. Thus, measurement variability should be considered when interpreting fetal growth rates.

Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound examination of the fetus is a powerful tool for assessing gestational age and detecting obstetric problems but is rarely available in developing countries. The aim of this study was to assess the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of fetal biometry by locally trained health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.

METHODS

One expatriate doctor and four local health workers participated in the study, which included examinations performed on every fifth pregnant woman with a singleton pregnancy between 16 and 40 weeks' gestation, and who had undergone an early dating ultrasound scan, attending the antenatal clinic in Maela refugee camp. At each examination, two examiners independently measured biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL), with one of the examiners obtaining duplicate measurements of each parameter. Intraobserver measurement error was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and interobserver error was assessed by the Bland and Altman 95% limits of agreement method.

RESULTS

A total of 4188 ultrasound measurements (12 per woman) were obtained in 349 pregnancies at a median gestational age of 27 (range, 16-40) weeks in 2008. The ICC for BPD, HC, AC and FL was greater than 0.99 for all four trainees and the doctor (range, 0.996-0.998). For gestational ages between 18 and 24 weeks, interobserver 95% limits of agreement corresponding to differences in estimated gestational age of less than +/- 1 week were calculated for BPD, HC, AC and FL. Measurements by local health workers showed high levels of agreement with those of the expatriate doctor.

CONCLUSIONS

Locally trained health workers working in a well organized unit with ongoing quality control can obtain accurate fetal biometry measurements for gestational age estimation. This experience suggests that training of local health workers in developing countries is possible and could allow effective use of obstetric ultrasound imaging.

Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review

OBJECTIVE

To review the prevalence of and our ability to identify macrosomic (birthweight >4000 g) fetuses. Additionally, based on the current evidence, propose an algorithm for treatment of suspected macrosomia.

STUDY DESIGN

A review.

RESULTS

According to the National Vital Statistics, in the United States, the prevalence of newborns weighing at least 4000 g has decreased by 10% in seven years (10.2% in 1996 and 9.2% in 2002) and 19% for newborns with weights >5000 g (0.16% and 0.13%, respectively). Bayesian calculations indicates that the posttest probability of detecting a macrosomic fetus in an uncomplicated pregnancy is variable, ranging from 15% to 79% with sonographic estimates of birth weight, and 40 to 52% with clinical estimates. Among diabetic patients the post-test probability of identifying a newborn weighing >4000 g clinically and sonographically is over 60%. Among uncomplicated pregnancies, there is sufficient evidence that suspected macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery. For pregnancies complicated by diabetes, with a prior cesarean delivery or shoulder dystocia, delivery of a macrosomic fetus increases the rate of complications, but there is insufficient evidence about the threshold of estimated fetal weight that should prompt cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

Due to the inaccuracies, among uncomplicated pregnancies suspicion of macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery.

Reproducibility Indices Applied to Cervical Pressure Pain Threshold Measurements in Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVES

To apply various statistical indices for reproducibility analysis of pressure pain threshold measurements and to derive a preferred pressure pain threshold measurement protocol based on these indices.

METHODS

The pressure pain threshold of 3 pairs of right and left homologous cervical region sites were measured in 20 healthy subjects (10 women, 10 men) using a hand-held pressure algometer. Measurements took place on 2 occasions (test 1 and test 2) separated by a mean interval of 1 week. On each testing session, the site-related pressure pain thresholds were measured 3 times each according to 2 different protocols. Protocol A consisted of a repetitive order, namely 3 consecutive measurements at each site before proceeding to the next, whereas protocol B consisted of an alternate order in which 3 consecutive rounds of all individually tested sites took place. For test 1, protocol A was followed by protocol B with an hour interval. For test 2, the reverse order took place.

RESULTS

The findings revealed no significant differences between the two protocols and indicated a significant rise (P < 0.0001) in the absolute scores from test 1 to test 2 in both protocols. Absolute values (mean +/-SD) derived from the entire sample of pressure pain threshold sites ranged from 140 +/- 60 to 198.7 +/- 95 kPa (1.60 +/- 0.6 to 1.99 +/- 0.95 kg/cm, respectively). No significant gender or side differences were noted. Pearson r as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient revealed good to excellent reproducibility for both protocols and for all sites measured: r = 0.79-0.94 and intraclass correlation coefficient(3,3) = 0.85-0.96, respectively. To define site-specific cutoff values indicating change at the 95% confidence level, 1.96*SEM was calculated, and its values ranged from 31.6 to 58.2 kPa, which correspond to 16.8% to 32.8% of the absolute mean values. In addition, the limits of agreement, which depict the individual test-retest differences relative to their mean, indicated a heteroscedastic trend.

DISCUSSION

The two protocols yielded very similar results. However, on the grounds of patient's comfort and compliance as well as facility of application, protocol B stands out as the more preferred between the two.

The importance of quality management in fetal measurement

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate factors contributing to inaccuracy in fetal measurements and to assess the clinical importance of measurement quality.

METHODS

One hundred images of biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC) and abdominal circumference (AC) measurements were collected from six centers (1800 measurements); the proportion meeting quality criteria was assessed. Four hundred images of AC were collected from one center, each image measured by ellipse fitting and tracing methods; clinical agreement between the methods was assessed. Fetal weight estimation (EFW) errors were compared between quality controlled and non-quality controlled studies. Images of three ACs on each of 400 fetuses were collected; where one measurement failed to meet quality criteria, it was compared with an optimal measurement on the same fetus.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine percent, 87% and 60% of BPD, HC and AC, respectively, met all quality criteria. Limits of agreement between ellipse and traced AC were -4.7 mm to 12.5 mm; 22% of sections were non-elliptical. EFW errors were significantly different but were confounded by differences in time to delivery. Limits of agreement between optimal and suboptimal AC measurements were -15.1 mm to 7.7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

AC quality criteria are less easily recognized and obtained than those for head measurements; training, adherence to protocols and audit are important. Differences between ellipse and traced AC may not justify the use of separate charts; the number of non-elliptical sections suggests that ellipse fitting is not appropriate. Comparison between EFW errors is not a suitable tool for audit. Failure to meet quality criteria results in clinically significant errors.

Repeatability of measurement of uterine artery pulsatility index using transvaginal color Doppler

OBJECTIVE

To assess the repeatability of measuring the pulsatility index of the uterine arteries using transvaginal color Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The pulsatility index was measured in 100 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine transvaginal Doppler examination of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks. To assess the repeatability of different components of variability, six measurements of the uterine artery pulsatility index were made on one of the uterine arteries in each patient.

RESULTS

Six measurements of the pulsatility index were successfully measured in all 100 patients, resulting in a total of 600 measurements. The repeatability was unrelated to the pulsatility index. On 95% of occasions the intraobserver, interobserver and waveform tracing repeatability was less than 0.24, 0.27 and 0.14, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of the pulsatility index using transvaginal color Doppler is highly reproducible when the examination is carried out by well-trained operators.

Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia

The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence that, including estimates of fetal macrosomia in patient care, will decrease adverse perinatal outcomes. A literature search for the years 1980 to 1999 was used. Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injuries occur more often in macrosomic than in non-macrosomic neonates. However, 26 to 58 percent of shoulder dystocias and 24 to 44 percent of brachial plexus injuries occur to babies weighing less than 4000 gm. Persistence of impairment is extremely rare. Neither historical nor clinical factors have strong positive predictive values for macrosomia. From 15 to 81 percent of the babies predicted to be macrosomic are confirmed by birth weight. Of babies determined to be macrosomic at birth, only 50 to 100 percent were successfully predicted. Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injuries are unpredictable events. Available evidence suggests that planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight do not reduce the incidence of shoulder dystocia and do not decrease adverse outcomes attributable to fetal macrosomia.

Ultrasonographic estimate of birth weight at 24 to 34 weeks: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The study was intended to compare the accuracies of ultrasonographic estimates of birth weights among infants born between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation at 3 tertiary centers.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective study subjects were matched for gestational age (1:1); all underwent ultrasonographic examination within 2 weeks of delivery. The estimates of birth weight were obtained according to 26 published regression equations and their accuracies were assessed with the mean standardized absolute error. For each center the equation with the lowest error was selected to generate (1) receiver-operating characteristic curves for an estimate to identify actual weight < 1500 g and (2) prediction limit calculations to determine the estimate that ensures at 70% confidence a birth weight > 1500 g.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one cases were analyzed at each center. Comparison of the 26 mean standardized errors at each center indicated that (1) the range was rather wide (eg, 89 +/- 87 to 365 +/- 313 g/kg) and (2) 73% (19/26) of the equations had significantly (P < .05) different accuracies. Receiver-operator characteristic curves show that fetal weight estimates of > or = 1600 g at 2 centers and > or = 1700 g at the third center are required to predict actual birth weight < 1500 g. Prediction limit calculation suggests that different fetal weight estimates (> 1600 g at center 1, > 1900 g for the center II, and > 1800 g at center III) are needed to predict actual weight > 1500 g with a 70% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonographic estimates of weight for preterm infants, as obtained from 26 equations, are characterized by a rather wide range of accuracy; for most of the equations the accuracies of estimates differ markedly among centers.

Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine

Minimal measurement error (reliability) during the collection of interval- and ratio-type data is critically important to sports medicine research. The main components of measurement error are systematic bias (e.g. general learning or fatigue effects on the tests) and random error due to biological or mechanical variation. Both error components should be meaningfully quantified for the sports physician to relate the described error to judgements regarding 'analytical goals' (the requirements of the measurement tool for effective practical use) rather than the statistical significance of any reliability indicators. Methods based on correlation coefficients and regression provide an indication of 'relative reliability'. Since these methods are highly influenced by the range of measured values, researchers should be cautious in: (i) concluding acceptable relative reliability even if a correlation is above 0.9; (ii) extrapolating the results of a test-retest correlation to a new sample of individuals involved in an experiment; and (iii) comparing test-retest correlations between different reliability studies. Methods used to describe 'absolute reliability' include the standard error of measurements (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV) and limits of agreement (LOA). These statistics are more appropriate for comparing reliability between different measurement tools in different studies. They can be used in multiple retest studies from ANOVA procedures, help predict the magnitude of a 'real' change in individual athletes and be employed to estimate statistical power for a repeated-measures experiment. These methods vary considerably in the way they are calculated and their use also assumes the presence (CV) or absence (SEM) of heteroscedasticity. Most methods of calculating SEM and CV represent approximately 68% of the error that is actually present in the repeated measurements for the 'average' individual in the sample. LOA represent the test-retest differences for 95% of a population. The associated Bland-Altman plot shows the measurement error schematically and helps to identify the presence of heteroscedasticity. If there is evidence of heteroscedasticity or non-normality, one should logarithmically transform the data and quote the bias and random error as ratios. This allows simple comparisons of reliability across different measurement tools. It is recommended that sports clinicians and researchers should cite and interpret a number of statistical methods for assessing reliability. We encourage the inclusion of the LOA method, especially the exploration of heteroscedasticity that is inherent in this analysis. We also stress the importance of relating the results of any reliability statistic to 'analytical goals' in sports medicine.

Evaluating measurement variability in clinical investigations: the case of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of studies seeking to establish measurement properties (reliability and validity) of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume.

DESIGN

Online searching of the MEDLINE database between 1966 and 1995, and scanning of bibliography of known studies on ultrasonic bladder volume estimation. Study selection and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Each article was evaluated for suitability of the reference standard, adequacy of reported blinding of the observers and appropriateness of the statistical index of concordance. The last two of these guidelines were applied to reliability studies (evaluating the relation among observed ultrasonic estimations), and all three guidelines were applied to validity studies (evaluating the relation of ultrasonic estimation with a definitive measurement).

POPULATION

One hundred and twenty-five participants enrolled in the five reliability studies and 769 participants in the 27 validity studies selected for appraisal of their quality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rate of study compliance with preset criteria for high quality.

RESULTS

None of the studies complied with all of the criteria for high methodologic quality. In the five reliability studies, investigators did not report adequate blinding of observers in three (60%) and an appropriate index of reliability was not used in any. Among the 27 validity studies, there was a lack of a suitable reference standard in 6 (22%), an inadequate blinding in 25 (93%), and an inappropriate index of validity in all (100%).

CONCLUSION

Based on our guidelines for quality assessment, a large proportion of studies on measurement properties was found to have inadequate methods, raising concern about the credibility of the reliability and validity estimates reported. These deficiencies highlight the lack of rigour employed in the design, conduct and analysis of reliability and validity studies, which has the potential for leading to patient mismanagement due to biases in the assessment of measurement variability in clinical investigations.

Interactive automatic fetal head measurements from ultrasound images using multimedia computer technology

We have developed a tool to automatically detect inner and outer skull boundaries of a fetal head in ultrasound images. These boundaries are used to measure biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumference (HC). The algorithm is based on active contour models and takes 32 s on a Sun SparcStation 20/71. A high-performance desktop multimedia system called MediaStation 5000 (MS5000) is used as a model for our future ultrasound subsystem. On the MS5000, the optimized implementation of this algorithm takes 248 ms. The difference (between the computer-measured values on MS5000 and the gold standard) for BPD and HC was 1.43% (sigma = 1.00%) and 1.96% (sigma = 1.96%), respectively. According to our data analysis, no significant differences exist in the BPD and HC measurements made on the MS5000 and those measurements made on the Sun SparcStation 20/71. Reduction in the overall execution time from 32 s to 248 ms will help making this algorithm a practical ultrasound tool for sonographers.

Automatic fetal head measurements from sonographic images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We designed an image processing technique to automatically measure the biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumference (HC) from prenatal sonograms. We evaluated the performance of the algorithm by comparing the resulting measurements with those made by experienced sonographers.

METHODS

Thirty-five digitized sonograms of the fetal head were obtained during routine imaging. The BPD and HC were automatically computed by detecting the inner and outer boundaries of the fetal skull using the computer vision technique known as the "active contour model." Six experienced sonographers also measured the BPD and HC on these images.

RESULTS

The algorithm failed to locate the boundaries in two of the 35 cases. For the remaining cases, the mean absolute difference between the automated measurements and the average of the six observers was 1.4% for BPD and 2.9% for HC. The correlations were .999 for the BPD and .994 for the HC. The computer's measurements were no different from the six observers' measurements than the observers' measurements were from one another.

CONCLUSION

The tested algorithm effectively and accurately measures BPD and HC automatically. We are currently in the process of integrating this algorithm into an ultrasound machine.

Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To study prospectively the prediction power, at different gestations, of clinical and ultrasound measurements for fetal size in diabetic pregnancy.

SETTING

A large combined obstetric diabetic clinic in a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and eighty-one pregnancies in which women had scans at least two of three specific time points and who were delivered of singletons after 34 weeks: 73% were pre-gestational insulin-dependent diabetics, the others were pre-gestational White class A or gestational diabetics.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinical estimates of fundal height and fetal size and ultrasound estimates of abdominal circumference and head circumference were routinely carried out at gestational ages of 28, 34 and 38 weeks or before delivery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Standardised birthweight, corrected for gestation and parity. The relation with clinical and ultrasound measurements was investigated using multiple linear regression and the capability of the measurements to predict macrosomic births (> 95th centile of normals) using receiver-operator characteristic curves.

RESULTS

All measurements are poor predictors of eventual standardised birthweight. Prediction improves with closeness to delivery. Prediction is significantly improved by adding ultrasound to clinical information, but at 34 weeks or later this only contributes 8% of the variance. There is no difference in the prediction power for macrosomia between clinical and ultrasound measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Even regular serial scanning and clinical examination will not always diagnose the macrosomic fetus in diabetic pregnancy. In our hands, clinical examination is as predictive as ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound does add to clinical prediction power but only to a small extent. Ultrasound should be used in a selected way, as defined by clinical findings, and with recognition and understanding of the errors and biases involved.

Ultrasound anthropometric reliability

Method errors and reliabilities were estimated for seven sonographic measurements in pregnancies of 106 women examined between January and July 1989. Teams of two experienced sonographers replicated the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), transabdominal distance (TAD), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). Multilevel modeling procedures were used to estimate the variance components. Significant (p < 0.01) covariates in the fixed part of the model included an increase in error with greater parity, estimated menstrual age (EMA), and maternal abdominal wall thickness (taken at the umbilicus). Intraobserver reliability ranged from 85.2% (AC) to 99.3% (FDL); interobserver reliability ranged from 80.8% (TAD) to 92.4% (FDL). Method errors, describing the expected error for 68% of the measurements taken, ranged from 0.8 mm to 7.7 mm (intraobserver) and from 1.2 mm to 7.8 mm (interobserver). These results suggest that large error components should be considered in the interpretation of the reliability of ultrasonographically obtained measurements.

Neonatal morphometric indices of fetal growth: analysis of observer variability

Measurements of triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference (MAC), head circumference (HC) and crown-heel length were performed by two observers in 30 healthy neonates. Intra-observer standard deviation for all measurements, calculated using one-way analysis of variance, was small and similar for each observer. Inter-observer variability was assessed using limits of agreement. There were small, systematic, differences between observers for measurements of triceps skinfold thickness and crown-heel length, and for calculated ponderal index (PI). When related to respective published reference ranges, the 95% prediction intervals for subscapular (-0.51, 0.68 mm) and triceps (-0.65, 0.29 mm) skinfold thicknesses were less than those for the MAC/HC ratio (-2.1, 1.9) and PI (-0.23, 0.28). The results indicate that skinfold thickness measurements are a more robust measure and, therefore, may be of greater value in the assessment of neonates with suspected fetal growth retardation.

Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: analysis of inter- and intra-observer variability

Standard ultrasound measurements were performed by two observers in 40 third-trimester fetuses. Observers were blinded to the results of the measurements. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated using two published formulae. The intra-observer standard deviation for EFW, assessed using one-way analysis of variance, was < 75 g for both observers. The 95% prediction intervals for inter-observer comparisons of EFW, calculated using the limits of agreement method, were -187.3 g to 139.8 g, and -159.9 g to 124.3 g, using the two formulae. The results suggest that measurements of EFW are reproducible. The prediction interval is comparable to the weekly fetal weight increment in normal fetuses.

Intrapartum amniotic fluid index and its relationship to fetal distress

Amniotic fluid index was measured in 50 consecutive laboring women after membrane rupture. The 10th percentile of the normal range was 6.2 cm. Thirty-three women had a repeat measurement by a second observer. Although there was no systematic bias between the two observers, the limits of agreement were wide: 95% of the measurements by one observer were between 0.59 and 2.07 times those of the second. Closer agreement was observed when amniotic fluid index was low (less than 6.2 cm). The relationship between intrapartum amniotic fluid index and fetal distress was then investigated in a further 60 laboring women. When compared with women with a normal intrapartum amniotic fluid index, women with a low amniotic fluid index had higher incidences of fetal heart rate abnormalities during the first stage of labor (64% vs 20%, p less than 0.01), meconium (grade II or III) at delivery (64% vs 35%, p less than 0.05), and operative delivery for fetal distress (57% vs 17%, p less than 0.01). Umbilical artery pH and Apgar scores were, however, similar for the two groups. Measurement of intrapartum amniotic fluid index may be an appropriate method for selecting women suitable for intrapartum aminoinfusion.

Effectiveness of ultrasound determination of fetal abdominal circumference and fetal ponderal index in the diagnosis of asymmetrical growth retardation

A total of 310 unselected women attending an antenatal clinic was screened for growth retardation by ultrasound between 34 and 36 weeks gestation, by measuring the fetal abdominal circumference (AC) and femoral length (FL), from which the 'fetal ponderal index' (AC/FL) was calculated. Asymmetrical growth retardation in the newborn was assessed by Rohrer's ponderal index and the mid-arm/occipito-frontal circumference (MAC/OFC) ratio within 72 h of birth, a neonatal ponderal index or MAC/OFC ratio below the 10th centile being considered abnormal. The sensitivities of an AC below the 25th centile in identifying a birthweight, neonatal ponderal index or MAC/OFC ratio below the 10th centile were 86, 62 and 67% respectively, the specificities being 80, 78 and 76%. The sensitivities of a fetal ponderal index below the 25th centile in identifying a neonatal ponderal index or MAC/OFC ratio below the 10th centile were 52 and 47% respectively, the specificities being 77 and 77%. A possible reason for the poor performance of the fetal ponderal index is discussed.