Conformational change of the transmembrane helices II and IV of metabotropic glutamate receptor involved in G protein activation

The intracellular C-terminal domain of mGluR6 contains ER retention motifs

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 (mGluR6) predominantly localizes to the postsynaptic sites of retinal ON-bipolar cells, at which it recognizes glutamate released from photoreceptors. The C-terminal domain (CTD) of mGluR6 contains a cluster of basic amino acids resembling motifs for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention. We herein investigated whether these basic residues are involved in regulating the subcellular localization of mGluR6 in 293T cells expressing mGluR6 CTD mutants using immunocytochemistry, immunoprecipitation, and flow cytometry. We showed that full-length mGluR6 localized to the ER and cell surface, whereas mGluR6 mutants with 15- and 20-amino acid deletions from the C terminus localized to the ER, but were deficient at the cell surface. We also demonstrated that the cell surface deficiency of mGluR6 mutants was rescued by introducing an alanine substitution at basic residues within the CTD. The surface-deficient mGluR6 mutant still did not localize to the cell surface and was retained in the ER when co-expressed with surface-expressible constructs, including full-length mGluR6, even though surface-deficient and surface-expressible constructs formed heteromeric complexes. The co-expression of the surface-deficient mGluR6 mutant reduced the surface levels of surface-expressible constructs. These results indicate that basic residues in the mGluR6 CTD served as ER retention signals. We suggest that exposed ER retention motifs in the aberrant assembly containing truncated or misfolded mGluR6 prevent these protein complexes from being transported to the cell surface.

Analysis of positive and negative allosteric modulation in metabotropic glutamate receptors 4 and 5 with a dual ligand

As class C GPCRs and regulators of synaptic activity, human metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) 4 and 5 are prime targets for allosteric modulation, with mGlu5 inhibition or mGlu4 stimulation potentially treating conditions like chronic pain and Parkinson’s disease. As an allosteric modulator that can bind both receptors, 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) is able to negatively modulate mGlu5 or positively modulate mGlu4. At a structural level, how it elicits these responses and how mGluRs undergo activation is unclear. Here, we employ homology modelling and 30 µs of atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to probe allosteric conformational change in mGlu4 and mGlu5, with and without docked MPEP. Our results identify several structural differences between mGlu4 and mGlu5, as well as key differences responsible for MPEP-mediated positive and negative allosteric modulation, respectively. A novel mechanism of mGlu4 activation is revealed, which may apply to all mGluRs in general. This involves conformational changes in TM3, TM4 and TM5, separation of intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) from ICL1/ICL3, and destabilization of the ionic-lock. On the other hand, mGlu5 experiences little disturbance when MPEP binds, maintaining its inactive state with reduced conformational fluctuation. In addition, when MPEP is absent, a lipid molecule can enter the mGlu5 allosteric pocket.

The anatomy of mammalian sweet taste receptors

All sweet-tasting compounds are detected by a single G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), the heterodimer T1R2-T1R3, for which no experimental structure is available. The sweet taste receptor is a class C GPCR, and the recently published crystallographic structures of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 1 and 5 provide a significant step forward for understanding structure-function relationships within this family. In this article, we recapitulate more than 600 single point site-directed mutations and available structural data to obtain a critical alignment of the sweet taste receptor sequences with respect to other class C GPCRs. Using this alignment, a homology 3D-model of the human sweet taste receptor is built and analyzed to dissect out the role of key residues involved in ligand binding and those responsible for receptor activation. Proteins 2017; 85:332-341. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Glutamate acts as a partial inverse agonist to metabotropic glutamate receptor with a single amino acid mutation in the transmembrane domain

Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), a prototypical family 3 G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), has served as a model for studying GPCR dimerization, and growing evidence has revealed that a glutamate-induced dimeric rearrangement promotes activation of the receptor. However, structural information of the seven-transmembrane domain is severely limited, in contrast to the well studied family 1 GPCRs including rhodopsins and adrenergic receptors. Homology modeling of mGluR8 transmembrane domain with rhodopsin as a template suggested the presence of a conserved water-mediated hydrogen-bonding network between helices VI and VII, which presumably constrains the receptor in an inactive conformation. We therefore conducted a mutational analysis to assess structural similarities between mGluR and family 1 GPCRs. Mutational experiments confirmed that the disruption of the hydrogen-bonding network by T789Y(6.43) mutation induced high constitutive activity. Unexpectedly, this high constitutive activity was suppressed by glutamate, the natural agonist ligand, indicating that glutamate acts as a partial inverse agonist to this mutant. Fluorescence energy transfer analysis of T789Y(6.43) suggested that the glutamate-induced reduction of the activity originated not from the dimeric rearrangement but from conformational changes within each protomer. Double mutational analysis showed that the specific interaction between Tyr-789(6.43) and Gly-831(7.45) in T789Y(6.43) mutant was important for this phenotype. Therefore, the present study is consistent with the notion that the metabotropic glutamate receptor shares a common activation mechanism with family 1 GPCRs, where rearrangement between helices VI and VII causes the active state formation.

Encephalopsin (OPN3) protein abundance in the adult mouse brain

Encephalopsin belongs to the family of extraretinal opsins having a putative role in CNS tissue photosensitivity. Encephalopsin mRNA has earlier been localized in rodent brains, but expression and localization of the protein has not yet been reported. In this study, we aimed to define encephalopsin protein abundance and localization in the rodent brain. The distribution and localization of encephalopsin protein in a mouse brain and selected peripheral tissues were analysed in ten mice, using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. The specificity of immunoreaction was validated by primary antibody omitting and immunizing peptide blocking experiment. We found encephalopsin protein abundant in the mouse brain, but not in the periphery. Encephalopsin protein was present in neurons of the mouse cerebral cortex, paraventricular area, and cerebellar cells. Our results show that encephalopsin is expressed at the protein level in different brain areas of the mouse. Therefore, the suggested idea that encephalopsin plays a role in non-visual photic processes seems to be applicable. Evidently, further investigations are needed to find out the signalling mechanisms, and the potential physiological role of encephalopsin in phototransduction due to the changes in ambient light.

The intra-molecular activation mechanisms of the dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 differ depending on the type of G proteins

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGlu1) functions as a homodimer and activates not only the Gq but also the Gi/o and Gs pathways. Because of the dimeric configuration, different pathways could be activated either through the glutamate-bound subunit (cis-activation) and/or the other one (trans-activation). We here examined whether the intra-molecular activation mechanisms in the mGlu1 differ depending on the type of coupling G proteins, using various combinations of mGlu1 constructs that lack glutamate binding and/or G-protein coupling. The cis- or trans-activation alone was confirmed to trigger the Gq-coupled intracellular Ca(2+) transient. In contrast, the Gi/o-coupled G protein-dependent inward rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels were not activated either through the cis- or trans-activation alone. When one subunit of dimeric mGlu1 lacked the G-protein coupling, a significant decrease in the glutamate-induced GIRK current density was also observed. As the G protein-coupling-deficient subunit did not decrease the cell surface expression of mGlu1 and the Gq-coupled Ca(2+) transient, it was suggested that the coupling deficiency in one subunit of mGlu1 attenuates the Gi/o but not Gq coupling. In conclusion, multiple G-protein signaling was differentially activated by different intra-molecular activation mechanisms of the dimeric mGlu1.

Comparative fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of metabotropic glutamate receptors: implications about the dimeric arrangement and rearrangement upon ligand bindings

Dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors has received much attention as a regulatory system of physiological function. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are suitable models for studying the physiological significance of G protein-coupled receptor dimers because they form constitutive homodimers and function through dimeric rearrangement of their extracellular ligand binding domains. However, the molecular architecture of the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and their rearrangement upon agonist binding are still largely unknown. Here we show that the two helix Vs are arranged as the closest part in the dimeric TMDs and change their positions through synergistic control by the binding of two glutamates. The possibility that helix V is involved in an inter-protomer communication was first suggested by the finding that constitutively active mutation sites were identified on both sides of helix V. Then, comprehensive fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis using mGluRs whose cytoplasmic loops were labeled with donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins revealed that the third intracellular loop connecting helices V and VI of one protomer was in close proximity to the second and third intracellular loops of the other protomer and that all the intracellular loops became closer during the activation. Furthermore, FRET analysis of heterodimers in which only one protomer had ligand binding ability revealed the synergistic effect of the binding of two glutamates on the dimeric rearrangements of the TMD. Thus, the glutamate-dependent synergistic relocation of the helix Vs in the dimer is important for the signal flow from the extracellular ligand binding domain to the cytoplasmic surface of the mGluR.

Ligand-induced rearrangements of the GABA(B) receptor revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (GABA(B)R), one of the family C G-protein-coupled receptor members, exists as a heterodimer comprised of subunits GB1 and GB2. To clarify the ligand-induced activation mechanism of the GABA(B)R, each subunit was fused with either Cerulean or enhanced yellow fluorescent protein at its intracellular loop, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) changes upon agonist application were monitored. As a result, FRET decreases were observed between GB1a loop 2 and GB2 loop 2 and between GB1a loop 2 and GB2 loop 1, suggesting the dissociation of intracellular domains during the receptor activation. Both intersubunit FRET pairs were expected to faithfully capture the activation of the original receptor as their pharmacological properties were highly similar to that of the wild-type receptor. However, the intrasubunit data suggest that the receptor activation does not involve major structural changes within the transmembrane domain of each subunit. By combining the results obtained from two different levels, it was concluded that the GABA(B)R activation by agonist is associated with an asymmetrical intersubunit rearrangement of GB1a and GB2 on the membrane. This type of activation mode, an intersubunit rearrangement without apparent intrahelical structural changes, appears commonly shared by the GABA(B)R and the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1alpha, another family C G-protein-coupled receptor previously studied by our group. Nevertheless, the directions of intracellular domain movements and its asymmetry observed here highlight the qualitative difference between the two receptors.

Activation switch in the transmembrane domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), members of family 3 G protein-coupled receptors, play pivotal roles in the modulation of synaptic transmission and are important drug targets for various neurological diseases. The structures of the extracellular ligand-binding domain (ECD) of mGluRs and its changes upon ligand binding have been well studied by various techniques, including X-ray crystallography. In contrast, little is known about the structure and structural changes of the seven-transmembrane domain (TMD). Here we searched for constitutively active mutation (CAM) sites in the TMD of mGluR8 to get insight into the epicenter of the structural changes in TMD, a potential target for allosteric ligands. Mutational analyses based on the knowledge of activating mutations of calcium-sensing receptor showed the presence of several CAM sites in the TMD of mGluR8. Among them, the site at position 764 in helix V, where threonine is present, is unique in that any substitution resulted in elevation of the basal activity, and some substitutions caused a loss of responsiveness to agonist. Further comprehensive mutational analyses indicated that the additional mutation of the CAM site at position 663 in helix III, where a tyrosine residue is present, generated a revertant phenotype. Mutations at these sites also increased the agonist binding affinity, although these sites are far from the ECD. These results indicated that the specific pair of amino acids at these CAM sites forms an activation switch that stabilizes the inactive state of mGluR8 and mediates the signal flow from the ECD to the cytoplasmic G protein-interacting site.