Effects of pretreatment with clonidine, lithium and quinine on the activities of antidepressant drugs in the mouse tail suspension test

Are Noradrenergic Transmission Reducing Drugs Antidepressants?

Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains a significant public health problem worldwide, and revised treatment strategies are therefore urgently needed, including the creation of novel antidepressant compounds or using existing molecular entities in new ways. Etiologic theories of MDD from decades ago have suggested that synaptic deficiencies of monoaminergic neurotransmitters play a causative role in this neuropsychiatric disorder, and that boosting monoamines with drugs such as SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, and MAOIs has antidepressant effects and in some individuals can even induce hypomania or mania. While other factors, such as various intracellular molecular pathways and hippocampal neurogenesis, undoubtedly also play a role in MDD, monoaminergic boosting drugs nonetheless have clearly demonstrated antidepressant properties. There is also, however, a body of studies in the preclinical literature suggesting that monoaminergic transmission reducing drugs, including noradrenergic ones, also have antidepressant-like behavioral properties in rodents. Given that there is increasing evidence that the monoamines have u-shaped or Janus-faced dose-response properties, in which a mid-range value is "optimal" in a variety of behavioral and physiological processes, it is plausible that either too much or too little synaptic norepinephrine in key circuits may exacerbate MDD in some individuals. Here we briefly review rodent depression-related behavioral data, focusing on the forced swim test, from three major classes of noradrenergic transmission reducing drugs (alpha2 agonists, beta blockers, alpha1 antagonists), and find much support for the hypothesis that they have antidepressant-like properties. Whether these drugs are antidepressants in human subjects remains to be determined.

Lithium and cognitive enhancement: leave it or take it?

RATIONALE

Lithium is established as an effective treatment of acute mania, bipolar and unipolar depression and as prophylaxis against bipolar disorder. Accumulating evidence is also delineating a neuroprotective and neurotrophic role for lithium. However, its primary effects on cognitive functioning remain ambiguous.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to review and combine the relevant translational studies, focusing on the putative cognitive enhancement properties of lithium, specifically on learning, memory, and attention.

DISCUSSION

These properties are also discussed in reference to research demonstrating a protective action of lithium against cognitive deficits induced by various challenges to the nervous system, such as stress, trauma, neurodegenerative disorders, and psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested on the basis of the evidence that the cognitive effects of lithium are best expressed and should, therefore, be sought under conditions of functional or biological challenge to the nervous system.

Involvement of AMPA receptors in the antidepressant-like effects of lithium in the mouse tail suspension test and forced swim test

In addition to its clinical antimanic effects, lithium also has efficacy in the treatment of depression. However, the mechanism by which lithium exerts its antidepressant effects is unclear. Our objective was to further characterize the effects of peripheral and central administration of lithium in mouse models of antidepressant efficacy as well as to investigate the role of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors in these behaviors. We utilized the mouse forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST), intracerebroventricular (ICV) lithium administration, AMPA receptor inhibitors, and BS3 crosslinking followed by Western blot. Both short- and long-term administration of lithium resulted in robust antidepressant-like effects in the mouse FST and TST. Using ICV administration of lithium, we show that these effects are due to actions of lithium on the brain, rather than to peripheral effects of the drug. Both ICV and rodent chow (0.4% LiCl) administration paradigms resulted in brain lithium concentrations within the human therapeutic range. The antidepressant-like effects of lithium in the FST and TST were blocked by administration of AMPA receptor inhibitors. Additionally, administration of lithium increased the cell surface expression of GluR1 and GluR2 in the mouse hippocampus. Collectively, these data show that lithium exerts centrally mediated antidepressant-like effects in the mouse FST and TST that require AMPA receptor activation. Lithium may exert its antidepressant effects in humans through AMPA receptors, thus further supporting a role of targeting AMPA receptors as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of depression.

The behavioral actions of lithium in rodent models: leads to develop novel therapeutics

For nearly as long as lithium has been in clinical use for the treatment of bipolar disorder, depression, and other conditions, investigators have attempted to characterize its effects on behaviors in rodents. Lithium consistently decreases exploratory activity, rearing, aggression, and amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion; and it increases the sensitivity to pilocarpine-induced seizures, decreases immobility time in the forced swim test, and attenuates reserpine-induced hypolocomotion. Lithium also predictably induces conditioned taste aversion and alterations in circadian rhythms. The modulation of stereotypy, sensitization, and reward behavior are less consistent actions of the drug. These behavioral models may be relevant to human symptoms and to clinical endophenotypes. It is likely that the actions of lithium in a subset of these animal models are related to the therapeutic efficacy, as well the side effects, of the drug. We conclude with a brief discussion of various molecular mechanisms by which these lithium-sensitive behaviors may be mediated, and comment on the ways in which rat and mouse models can be used more effectively in the future to address persistent questions about the therapeutically relevant molecular actions of lithium.

The role of mood stabilisers in the treatment of the depressive facet of bipolar disorders

It was previously shown that available mood stabilisers are used to treat bipolar depression. As part of the natural course of illness, patients with bipolar disorder often suffer from episodes of depression more frequently and for longer durations than mania. A major challenge in the treatment of bipolar depression is the tendency for antidepressant medications, particularly tricyclic antidepressants, to precipitate episodes of mania, or to increase cycle frequency or symptom intensity. Thus, exploring the utility of mood stabilisers as monotherapy for bipolar depression is important. The aim of this review it to collate data involving the effects of some mood stabilisers like lithium, carbamazepine, valproate and lamotrigine in depressive aspects of bipolar disorder, but as well using an animal model of depression, to understand their mechanism of action.

α2-Adrenergic agonists antagonise the anxiolytic-like effect of antidepressants in the four-plate test in mice

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) has been reported to be efficient in anxiety disorders. Some animal models have demonstrated an anxiolytic-like effect following acute administration, however, it is not yet known how noradrenergic receptors are implicated in the therapeutic effects of antidepressants (ADs) in anxiety. The effects of two alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (clonidine, guanabenz) on anxiolytic-like effect of two SSRIs (paroxetine and citalopram) and two SNRIs (venlafaxine and milnacipran) were evaluated in the four-plate test (FPT) in mice. Paroxetine (4 mg/kg), citalopram (8 mg/kg), venlafaxine (8 mg/kg), and milnacipran (8 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) increased the number of punishments accepted by mice in the FPT. Clonidine (0.0039-0.5 mg/kg) and guanabenz (0.03-0.5mg/kg) had no effect on the number of punishments accepted by mice. Clonidine (0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg) and guanabenz (0.125 and 0.5 mg/kg) (i.p. -45 min) reversed the anti-punishment effect of paroxetine, citalopram, venlafaxine and milnacipran (i.p. -30 min). But if the antidepressants are administered 45 min before the test and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists 30 min before the test, alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists failed to alter the anti-punishment effect of antidepressants. The results of this present study indicate that alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists antagonise the anxiolytic-like effect of antidepressants in mice when they are administered 15 min before the administration of antidepressant suggesting a close inter-regulation between noradrenergic and serotoninergic system in the mechanism of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety-like behaviour.

The tail suspension test as a model for assessing antidepressant activity: review of pharmacological and genetic studies in mice

Since its introduction almost 20 years ago, the tail suspension test has become one of the most widely used models for assessing antidepressant-like activity in mice. The test is based on the fact that animals subjected to the short-term, inescapable stress of being suspended by their tail, will develop an immobile posture. Various antidepressant medications reverse the immobility and promote the occurrence of escape-related behaviour. This review focuses on the utility this test as part of a research program aimed at understanding the mechanism of action of antidepressants. We discuss the inherent difficulties in modeling depression in rodents. We describe how the tail suspension differs from the closely related forced swim test. Further, we address some key issues associated with using the TST as a model of antidepressant action. We discuss issues regarding whether it satisfies criteria to be a valid model for assessing depression-related behavioural traits. We elaborate on the tests' ease of use, strain differences observed in the test and gender effects in the test. We focus on the utility of the test for genetic analysis. Furthermore, we discuss the concept of whether immobility maybe a behavioural trait relevant to depression. All of the available pharmacological data using the test in genetically modified mice is collated. Special attention is given to selective breeding programs such as the Rouen 'depressed' mice which have been bred for high and low immobility in the tail suspension test. We provide an extensive pooling of the pharmacological studies published to date using the test. Finally, we provide novel pharmacological validation of an automated system (Bioseb) for assessing immobility. Taken together, we conclude that the tail suspension test is a useful test for assessing the behavioural effects of antidepressant compounds and other pharmacological and genetic manipulations relevant to depression.

Antidepressant-like effects in various mice strains in the tail suspension test

Several studies have reported rodent strain differences in the response to antidepressants in animal models of depression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential contribution of genetic factors to antidepressant response in an animal model of depression: the tail suspension test (TST). For this study four mice strains (Swiss and NMRI, two outbred strains and DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj, two inbred strains) were submitted to the TST after acute administration of five antidepressants: the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) imipramine and desipramine, the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) paroxetine and citalopram and the dopamine reuptake inhibitor bupropion. The C57BL/6J Rj strain had a longer baseline immobility time in comparison to the other strains. All antidepressants studied in this work decreased immobility time in the Swiss and C57BL/6J Rj strains. However, the Swiss strain displayed greater sensitivity to citalopram (from 2mg/kg) and C57BL/6J Rj to paroxetine (from 0.5mg/kg). This latter presented a greater size-effect with citalopram than with other strains and reached more than 60% from 8mg/kg. Moreover the size-effect of desipramine, paroxetine and bupropion in Swiss mice was greater than in the other strains in the TST. The NMRI and DBA/2 mice only responded to 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, both selective (paroxetine, citalopram) or non-selective (imipramine). The NMRI strain was more sensitive to imipramine and presented a size-effect (43% at 8mg/kg) superior to those of other strains. DBA/2 strain was more sensitive to citalopram than paroxetine and imipramine. Our results suggest that response to an antidepressant treatment is under control of genetic factors and that the strain of mouse is an important parameter to consider.

Additive effect of clonidine and fluoxetine on apomorphine-induced aggressive behavior in adult male Wistar rats

BACKGROUND

Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has been reported to be superior in its antiaggressive properties as compared with other antidepressants. The objective of the study was to investigate whether the effect of a minimal effective dose of fluoxetine could be potentiated by the alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine.

METHODS

Vehicle (1.0 mL/kg), clonidine (0.1 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), and their combination [clonidine (0.1 mg/kg) plus fluoxetine (10 mg/kg)] were injected into apomorphine-pretreated (1.0 mg/kg, once daily during 12 days) aggressive adult male Wistar rats.

RESULTS

Repeated apomorphine treatment induced a gradual development of aggressive behavior. Combined clonidine and fluoxetine treatment attenuated the intensity of aggressive behavior, while these drugs alone had only a weak tendency toward reduction of aggression. Latency before the first attack was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiments confirm that combined clonidine and fluoxetine treatment elicits an additive antiaggressive effect on apomorphine-induced aggressive behavior in rats.

Are there gender differences in the temperature profile of mice after acute antidepressant administration and exposure to two animal models of depression?

Numerous studies have reported gender differences in the rates of depression in humans, but few behavioural observations of antidepressant drug effects have been investigated in female mice. The forced swimming test (FST) is widely used as a predictor of antidepressant activity in rodents, as is the tail suspension test (TST), where immobility is objectively measured and in this last test, no hypothermia is induced by immersion in cold water. The present study investigated gender differences in the temperature profile of mice after acute antidepressant administration (imipramine and paroxetine) and exposure to two animal models of depression. Imipramine and paroxetine were active at 32 mg/kg in male mice in the FST, whereas they were active at 8, 16 and 32 mg/kg in female mice. In the TST, for both antidepressants immobility duration was reduced at a dose of 16 and 32 mg/kg in male mice and at 32 mg/kg in female mice. No significant difference was observed between male and female mice for immobility duration. Imipramine administration, but not paroxetine, decreased the temperature at the higher dose (32 mg/kg) in male and female mice in the FST. The body temperature was reduced in male and female mice for all treatment groups after FST challenge. Imipramine (16 and 32 mg/kg in male and 32 mg/kg in female mice), paroxetine (4, 16 and 32 mg/kg in male and 4 to 32 mg/kg in female mice) attenuated the reduction in temperature due to the FST. In the TST, imipramine tends to decrease the temperature in male and female mice, even though only imipramine at a dose of 32 mg/kg in female mice significantly decreases the temperature. Paroxetine had no effect on temperature. The TST enhanced the body temperature in male and female mice. In mice, there was no difference between the sexes after imipramine or paroxetine administration in the FST and TST. Both tests can be used to predict the activity of antidepressants as the decrease or enhancement of temperature is not correlated with a reduction in immobility duration.

Clonidine potentiates the effects of 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A/2C antagonists and 8-OH-DPAT in the mouse forced swimming test

The present study was undertaken to identify the receptor subtypes involved in clonidine's ability to enhance the effects of antidepressant drugs in the mouse forced swimming test. Clonidine (0.06 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the antidepressant-like effects of subactive doses of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (1 mg/kg, i.p.; P<0.01); the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, NAN 190 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.; P<0.01); the 5-HT1A/1B autoreceptor antagonist, (+/-) pindolol (32 mg/kg, i.p.; P<0.01); the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin (4 mg/kg, i.p.; P<0.01). Pretreatment with clonidine failed to increase mobility when administered in combination with the 5-HT1B receptor agonist, RU 24969 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, ketanserin (8 mg/kg, i.p.). In conclusion, clonidine-induced anti-immobility effects are more likely mediated by 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptors, as well as alpha-2-adrenergic autoreceptors situated on noradrenergic neurones. The results of the present study also demonstrate that serotonergic receptor function can influence alpha-2-adrenoreceptor mediated responses in the mouse forced swimming test.