1
|
Rascol O, Cochen de Cock V, Pavy-Le Traon A, Foubert-Samier A, Thalamas C, Sommet A, Rousseau V, Perez-Lloret S, Fabbri M, Azulay JP, Corvol JC, Couratier P, Damier P, Defebvre L, Durif F, Geny C, Houeto JL, Remy P, Tranchant C, Verin M, Tison F, Meissner WG. Fluoxetine for the Symptomatic Treatment of Multiple System Atrophy: The MSA-FLUO Trial. Mov Disord 2021; 36:1704-1711. [PMID: 33792958 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no effective treatments for multiple system atrophy (MSA). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (40 mg/d) for the symptomatic treatment of MSA. METHODS This was a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in patients with "probable" MSA. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to week 12 in the mean total score of the Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS Parts I + II). Secondary outcomes included change from baseline to week 6 in total UMSARS, and change from baseline to week 12 in the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson Disease-Autonomic Dysfunction, Beck Depression Inventory, and different domains of the MSA-Quality of Life Questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes included change from baseline to week 12 in the UMSARS Parts I and II separately and change from baseline to week 24 in the total UMSARS score. RESULTS A total of 81 patients were randomly assigned, with no significant difference in the primary outcome (-2.13 units [95% confidence interval, CI, -4.55 to 0.29]; P = 0.08). There was a greater reduction on fluoxetine in the change from baseline to 12-week in UMSARS Part II (exploratory outcome: -1.41 units [95% CI, -2.84; 0.03]; p = 0.05) and in MSA-QoL emotional/social dimension (secondary outcome: -6.99 units [95% CI, -13.40; -0.56]; p < 0.03). A total of 5 deaths occurred (3 on fluoxetine and 2 on placebo). CONCLUSION The MSA-FLUO failed to demonstrate fluoxetine superiority over placebo on the total UMSARS score, whereas trends in motor and emotional secondary/exploratory outcomes deserve further investigation. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Rascol
- French Reference Center for MSA, Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC1436, Departments of Neurosciences and Clinical Pharmacology, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, NeuroToul COEN Center, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Valérie Cochen de Cock
- Department of Neurology, Beau Soleil Clinic, Montpellier, France
- EuroMov Digital Health in Motion, University of Montpellier IMT Mines Ales, Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Pavy-Le Traon
- French Reference Center for MSA, Department of Neurosciences, Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC1436, UMR 1048, Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (I2MC), University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Alexandra Foubert-Samier
- French Reference Centre for MSA, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, University Hospital Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Claire Thalamas
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC 1436, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Agnes Sommet
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC 1436, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Vanessa Rousseau
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC 1436, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Santiago Perez-Lloret
- Centro de Altos Estudios en Ciencias Humanas y de la Salud (CAECIHS), Universidad Abierta Interamericana (UAI)-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Margherita Fabbri
- Department of Neurosciences, Toulouse Parkinson Expert Center, Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC1436, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Philippe Azulay
- Aix-Marseille Université et Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille; Movement Disorders Unit, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Corvol
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Inserm, CNRS, Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Department of Neurology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Neurosciences, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Couratier
- Centre de compétence AMS, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Philippe Damier
- CHU Nantes, Inserm, Centre d'investigation clinique 0004, Hôpital Laennec, Nantes, France
| | - Luc Defebvre
- Service de Neurologie et Pathologie du Mouvement, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU Lille, INSERM 1172, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Franck Durif
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France; NS-Park/FCRIN Network, Equipe d'Accueil 7280 Clermont Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Christian Geny
- Department of Neurology, EuroMov, University of Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Luc Houeto
- Service de Neurologie, Centre Expert Parkinson, centre de compétence AMS, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU de Limoges, Limoges cedex, France
| | - Philippe Remy
- Centre Expert Parkinson, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Equipe NPI, IMRB, INSERM et Faculté de Santé UPE-C, Créteil, France
| | - Christine Tranchant
- Service de Neurologie, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, INSERM-U964/CNRS-UMR7104; Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc Verin
- Centre Expert Parkinson-Bretagne, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, University Hospital of Rennes, EA 4712 "Behavior and Basal Ganglia", University of Rennes 1, Institut des Neurosciences Cliniques de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - François Tison
- Service de Neurologie des Maladies Neurodégénératives, French Reference Center for MSA, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wassilios G Meissner
- Service de Neurologie des Maladies Neurodégénératives, French Reference Center for MSA, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, and New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Role of serotonin and norepinephrine transporters in antidepressant-induced arterial hypertension: a pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 76:1321-1327. [DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02913-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
3
|
Eschlböck S, Wenning G, Fanciulli A. Evidence-based treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and related symptoms. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2017; 124:1567-1605. [PMID: 29058089 PMCID: PMC5686257 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-017-1791-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, postprandial hypotension and exercise-induced hypotension are common features of cardiovascular autonomic failure. Despite the serious impact on patient’s quality of life, evidence-based guidelines for non-pharmacological and pharmacological management are lacking at present. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on therapeutic options for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and related symptoms with evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Patient’s education and non-pharmacological measures remain essential, with strong recommendation for use of abdominal binders. Based on quality of evidence and safety issues, midodrine and droxidopa reach a strong recommendation level for pharmacological treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. In selected cases, a range of alternative agents can be considered (fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, yohimbine, atomoxetine, fluoxetine, ergot alkaloids, ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, octreotide, indomethacin, ibuprofen, caffeine, methylphenidate and desmopressin), though recommendation strength is weak and quality of evidence is low (atomoxetine, octreotide) or very low (fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, yohimbine, fluoxetine, ergot alkaloids, ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, indomethacin, ibuprofen, caffeine, methylphenidate and desmopressin). In case of severe postprandial hypotension, acarbose and octreotide are recommended (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence). Alternatively, voglibose or caffeine, for which a weak recommendation is available, may be useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Eschlböck
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Wenning
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alessandra Fanciulli
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huot P, Fox SH, Brotchie JM. Monoamine reuptake inhibitors in Parkinson's disease. PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2015; 2015:609428. [PMID: 25810948 PMCID: PMC4355567 DOI: 10.1155/2015/609428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 12/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The motor manifestations of Parkinson's disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review article summarises all of the available literature on use of 50 MAUIs in PD. The compounds are divided according to their relative potency for each of the monoamine transporters. Despite wide discrepancy in the methodology of the studies reviewed, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) selective serotonin transporter (SERT), selective noradrenaline transporter (NET), and dual SERT/NET inhibitors are effective against PD depression; (2) selective dopamine transporter (DAT) and dual DAT/NET inhibitors exert an anti-Parkinsonian effect when administered as monotherapy but do not enhance the anti-Parkinsonian actions of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA); (3) dual DAT/SERT inhibitors might enhance the anti-Parkinsonian actions of L-DOPA without worsening dyskinesia; (4) triple DAT/NET/SERT inhibitors might exert an anti-Parkinsonian action as monotherapy and might enhance the anti-Parkinsonian effects of L-DOPA, though at the expense of worsening dyskinesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Huot
- Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8
- Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8
- Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal and Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Susan H. Fox
- Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8
- Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8
| | - Jonathan M. Brotchie
- Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sánchez-Ferro A, Benito-León J, Gómez-Esteban JC. The management of orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease. Front Neurol 2013; 4:64. [PMID: 23772219 PMCID: PMC3677136 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Accepted: 05/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common and disabling symptom affecting Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. We present the effect of the different therapies commonly used to manage PD on this clinical manifestation. For this purpose, we describe the relationship between OH and the current treatments employed in PD, such as L-DOPA, dopaminergic agonists, and continuous dopaminergic stimulation therapies. Additionally, we review the therapeutic measures that could be used to ameliorate OH. There are different approaches to deal with this manifestation, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, although none of them is specifically aimed for treating OH in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvaro Sánchez-Ferro
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid , Spain ; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University , Madrid , Spain ; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Madrid , Spain ; Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid , Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative and disabling disease in which medical providers focus mainly on ameliorating problems in day-to-day functioning. This review summarizes current knowledge about the efficacy and tolerability of psychopharmacological agents in the treatment of depression, anxiety, psychosis, and insomnia in patients with PD. Recommended or promising nonpharmacological interventions are also reviewed. METHOD Studies were identified using computerized searches, with further references obtained from the bibliographies of the reviewed articles. RESULT Findings in the research literature provide growing evidence concerning the antidepressant treatment of patients with PD. Psychoeducational interventions for managing depression and anxiety symptoms also appear promising. Music therapy has proven to be particularly effective for patients with PD. Psychosis is common in patients with PD. When psychosis is induced by antiparkinson drugs, a dose reduction can be considered, but it is seldom successful. Patients with PD do not generally tolerate conventional antipsychotic medications, justifying evaluation of newer atypical agents in this population. Cholinesterase inhibitors have also become increasingly important in the treatment of PD in recent years. Finally, insomnia is a very frequent complaint in patients with PD and may also contribute to the development of depression. Patients should be encouraged to improve sleep hygiene and use behavioral interventions. Definitive trials of treatments for sleep disorders in this population are also warranted. CONCLUSION Therapeutic approaches to the treatment of PD and its associated psychiatric symptoms must be individualized and may involve a combination of antiparkinson drugs, psychopharmacological treatment, and/or psychotherapeutic interventions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Karayannis G, Giamouzis G, Cokkinos DV, Skoularigis J, Triposkiadis F. Diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: clinical implications. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013; 10:747-65. [PMID: 22894631 DOI: 10.1586/erc.12.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (DCAN), the impairment of the autonomic balance of the cardiovascular system in the setting of diabetes mellitus (DM), is frequently observed in both Type 1 and 2 DM, has detrimental effects on the quality of life and portends increased mortality. Clinical manifestations include: resting heart rate disorders, exercise intolerance, intraoperative cardiovascular lability, orthostatic alterations in heart rate and blood pressure, QT-interval prolongation, abnormal diurnal and nocturnal blood pressure variation, silent myocardial ischemia and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Clinical tests for autonomic nervous system evaluation, heart rate variability analysis, autonomic innervation imaging techniques, microneurography and baroreflex analysis are the main diagnostic tools for DCAN detection. Aldose reductase inhibitors and antioxidants may be helpful in DCAN therapy, but a regular, more generalized and multifactorial approach should be adopted with inclusion of lifestyle modifications, strict glycemic control and treatment of concomitant traditional cardiovascular risk factors, in order to achieve the best therapeutic results. In the present review, the authors provide aspects of DCAN pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and an algorithm regarding the evaluation and management of DCAN in DM patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamarre-Cliche M. Drug treatment of orthostatic hypotension because of autonomic failure or neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004; 2:23-35. [PMID: 14727996 DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200202010-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension either because of autonomic failure or neurocardiogenic syncope can be very incapacitating and should be treated accordingly. Drug therapy is frequently needed to alleviate orthostatic symptoms. The physiopathological basis of neurocardiogenic syncope and of autonomic failure is completely different and their treatment should be distinct. In the past 5 years, many randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shed light on the efficacy of specific pressor drugs. In patients with orthostatic hypotension because of autonomic failure, alpha-adrenoceptor agonists, and midodrine in particular, have been shown to increase standing blood pressure and decrease orthostatic symptoms. Other drugs such as octreotide, indomethacin or ergotamine have also been shown to elevate standing blood pressure and/or orthostatic tolerance. Fludrocortisone is a well known and frequently used pressor drug but randomized controlled studies are needed to measure its efficacy. In patients with orthostatic hypotension associated with neurocardiogenic syncope, clinical trials have demonstrated that beta-blockers, especially beta(1)-selective agents without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity such as atenolol, midodrine and paroxetine can decrease recurrence of syncope. Treatment algorithms, such as those presented in this review, should always be interpreted in the light of individual patient characteristics. Many of the drugs used for orthostatic hypotension have multiple indications and contraindications that should influence therapeutic decisions. Little is known about the effectiveness and tolerability of specific combinations of pressor drugs. Consequently, sound clinical judgment and close follow-up of patients should always guide combination therapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Maule S, Tredici M, Del Colle S, Chiandussi L. Treatment of Patients with Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2003. [DOI: 10.2165/00151642-200310020-00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
10
|
Senard JM, Brefel-Courbon C, Rascol O, Montastruc JL. Orthostatic hypotension in patients with Parkinson's disease: pathophysiology and management. Drugs Aging 2002; 18:495-505. [PMID: 11482743 DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200118070-00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension is common in elderly patients, and is now considered to be an important prognostic factor for cognitive decline and mortality. In patients with Parkinson's disease, the prevalence of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension may be as high as 20%. Two factors could explain this high prevalence. First, dopaminergic drugs may induce or worsen orthostatic hypotension. Secondly, Parkinson's disease is a cause of primary autonomic failure with an involvement of the peripheral autonomic system as shown by the ubiquitous distribution of Lewy bodies and reduced iobenguane [metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG)] cardiac uptake. These pathological and pharmacological characteristics clearly differentiate autonomic failure of Parkinson's disease from multiple system atrophy. If autonomic abnormalities appear to be present from the first stage of the disease, early onset (within the first year) of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in the course of parkinsonism can be considered as an exclusion criteria for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. No specific clinical trials have evaluated the effects of antihypotensive drugs in patients with Parkinson's disease and thus no specific therapeutic strategy can be recommended. The management of orthostatic hypotension in patients with Parkinson's disease should always start with patient education and nonpharmacological treatment. Drug therapy should be reserved for symptomatic patients who do not get benefit from nonpharmacological management. Among the available drugs, alpha1-adrenergic agonists (mainly midodrine) or plasma volume expanders (mainly fludrocortisone) are the most frequently used. There are also some drugs that are currently investigational such as yohimbine and droxidopa. Other drugs such as desmopressin or octreotide may be of interest in some situations. Domperidone is widely used in patients with parkinsonism with no proven effect on orthostatic hypotension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Senard
- Laboratory of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, INSERM U317, Faculty of Medicine, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tesei S, Antonini A, Canesi M, Zecchinelli A, Mariani CB, Pezzoli G. Tolerability of paroxetine in Parkinson's disease: a prospective study. Mov Disord 2000; 15:986-9. [PMID: 11009210 DOI: 10.1002/1531-8257(200009)15:5<986::aid-mds1034>3.0.co;2-i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression is a common finding in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, depression has been treated with tricyclic antidepressants, which are often associated with undesirable side effects that may limit their use in PD. Few studies have been performed with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in these patients. We assessed the tolerability of the SSRI antidepressant paroxetine (10-20 mg once per day) in 65 outpatients with PD and depression for a period of at least 3 months. Treatment was continued for 125.3+/-89.6 days (mean +/- standard deviation) in 52 patients. In these subjects the Hamilton Disease Rating Scale improved from 21.7+/-6.4 to 13.8+/-5.8 (p <0.001). Overall, 13 patients stopped paroxetine after 9.6+/-10.6 days because of adverse reactions. Two patients reported increased "off" time and tremor that reversed after treatment was stopped. No risk factors for intolerance were identified. Paroxetine is a safe and effective drug to treat depression in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Tesei
- Parkinson Center, Department of Neuroscience, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lazartigues E, Brefel-Courbon C, Bagheri H, Costes S, Gharib C, Tran MA, Senard JM, Montastruc JL. Fluoxetine-induced pressor response in freely moving rats: a role for vasopressin and sympathetic tone. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2000; 14:443-51. [PMID: 11129084 DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00426.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The present study was performed in order to assess, in freely moving rats, the cardiovascular effects of central administration of fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Two kinds of experiments were performed: 1) acute central administration of fluoxetine. and 2) chronic intraperitoneal administration of fluoxetine plus selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of fluoxetine (5-50 microg) induced an increase in blood pressure. This fluoxetine-induced pressor response reached its maximal 1 hour after injection without any significant change in heart rate. At the dose of 10 microg i.c.v., fluoxetine significantly increased mean blood pressure by 16 +/- 4 mmHg. This pressor response was reduced by an intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (500 microg kg(-1)) (+ 7 +/- 4 mmHg, P <0.05) or with the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (20 microg kg(-1)) (+5 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). The pressor response was completely abolished by a concomitant pretreatment with prazosin plus the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist. Pretreatment with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.), or the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserine (5 mg kg(-1) i.v.), did not modify the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. In freely moving rats receiving fluoxetine (10 microg i.c.v.), vasopressin plasma levels were significantly higher (39 +/- 5 pg mL(-1) than in rats receiving 10 microL i.c.v. saline (14 +/- 4 pg mL(-1)). A 30 day intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of fluoxetine in association with selegiline induced an increase in noradrenaline plasma levels and locomotor activity without any significant change in blood pressure and heart rate. These data suggest that, the pressor response elicited by central acute administration of fluoxetine is mediated by both an increase in sympathetic tone and vasopressin release. This observation could suggest the putative interest of alpha1-adrenoceptor and or V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonists in the treatment of "Serotonin Syndrome".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lazartigues
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Inserm U317 and Centre Midi-Pyrénées de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidémiologie et d'Informations sur le Médicament, Faculté de Médecine, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|