Different formulations of botulinum toxin type A have different migration characteristics: a double-blind, randomized study

Consensus on the therapeutic management of rosacea - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

BACKGROUND

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin, relatively more frequent in women over 30 with a low phototype and proven genetic predisposition. Although its etiology is unknown and possibly multifactorial, the immunological abnormality, associated with neurovascular dysregulation and triggering factors, are important elements in its pathophysiology, which lead to the main changes of inflammation, vasodilation, and angiogenesis that are responsible for the clinical manifestations. Despite the lack of cure, numerous therapeutic options are available for the different clinical presentations of the disease, with satisfactory responses.

OBJECTIVE

To reach a consensus, with recommendations from experts, on the therapeutic management of rosacea suitable to the Brazilian setting.

METHODS

The study was conducted by five specialized dermatologists from university centers, representatives of the different Brazilian regions, with experience in rosacea, who were appointed by the Brazilian Society of Dermatology. Based on the adapted DELPHI methodology, the experts contributed through an updated bibliographic review of the scientific evidence, combined with personal experiences.

RESULTS

The group of experts reached a consensus on the relevant aspects in the therapeutic management of rosacea, providing information on epidemiology, pathophysiology, triggering factors, clinical condition, classification, quality of life, and comorbidities. Consensus was defined as approval by at least 90% of the panel.

CONCLUSION

Despite the impossibility of cure, there are several therapeutic alternatives specific to each patient that provide excellent results, with chances of total improvement and long periods of remission, promoting a positive impact on quality of life. This consensus provides detailed guidance for clinical practice and therapeutic decisions in rosacea.

Botulinum Toxin in Aesthetic Medicine: Myths and Realities

Several formulations of Botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT-A) for aesthetic indications are available, with numbers likely to increase. Preparations are not interchangeable, based on dose unit comparisons.

Injectable and topical neurotoxins in dermatology: Basic science, anatomy, and therapeutic agents

Botulinum toxin is a potentially deadly anaerobic bacterial toxin that acts by inhibiting release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction, thereby inhibiting contraction of the exposed striated muscle. There are currently 4 botulinum toxin preparations approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): onabotulinumtoxin, abobotulinumtoxin, incobotulinumtoxin and rimabotulinumtoxin. While significant overlap exists, each product has unique properties and specifications, including dosing, diffusion, and storage. Extensive physician knowledge of facial anatomy, coupled with key differences of the various neurotoxin types, is essential for safe and successful treatments. The first article in this continuing medical education series reviews key characteristics of each neurotoxin, including new and upcoming agents, and provides an anatomic overview of the most commonly injected cosmetic sites.

The Dilution Confusion: Easy Dosing for Botulinum Toxins

Aesthetic practitioners prefer various reconstitution volumes for botulinum toxins (BoNTAs). Some injectors prefer larger volumes of bacteriostatic normal saline (NaCl) to achieve a larger diffusion in certain areas and a smaller volume for more precise administration of the BoNTA. Some practitioners believe dilution volumes do not matter at all in relation to spread or diffusion, asserting the diffusion area is simply dose-related. It can get confusing when there is more than one injector in an office, different volumes of saline, and more than one type of syringe to administer the neurotoxin. This leaves possibilities for confusion and dosage errors. This article explores four steps to take the confusion out of reconstituting BoNTAs and delivering accurate and consistent doses within a medical office.

Technical Considerations for Filler and Neuromodulator Refinements

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background: The toolbox for cosmetic practitioners is growing at an unprecedented rate. There are novel products every year and expanding off-label indications for neurotoxin and soft-tissue filler applications. Consequently, aesthetic physicians are increasingly challenged by the task of selecting the most appropriate products and techniques to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Methods: We employed a PubMed literature search of facial injectables from the past 10 years (2005–2015), with emphasis on those articles embracing evidence-based medicine. We evaluated the scientific background of every product and the physicochemical properties that make each one ideal for specific indications. The 2 senior authors provide commentary regarding their clinical experience with specific technical refinements of neuromodulators and soft-tissue fillers.

Results: Neurotoxins and fillers are characterized by unique physical characteristics that distinguish each product. This results in subtle but important differences in their clinical applications. Specific indications and recommendations for the use of the various neurotoxins and soft-tissue fillers are reviewed. The discussion highlights refinements in combination treatments and product physical modifications, according to specific treatment zones.

Conclusions: The field of facial aesthetics has evolved dramatically, mostly secondary to our increased understanding of 3-dimensional structural volume restoration. Our work reviews Food and Drug Administration–approved injectables. In addition, we describe how to modify products to fulfill specific indications such as treatment of the mid face, décolletage, hands, and periorbital regions. Although we cannot directly evaluate the duration or exact physical properties of blended products, we argue that “product customization” is safe and provides natural results with excellent patient outcomes.

Incorporating Minimally Invasive Procedures into an Aesthetic Surgery Practice

Minimally invasive procedures in an aesthetic practice have grown over the past decade. Plastic surgery practices are embracing the incorporation of injectables and lasers as adjuncts to their surgical procedures. The use of botulinum toxin, hyaluronic acid fillers, and lasers has made a significant impact on the authors' practice. The authors describe the important considerations, consultation goals, and procedural steps with injectables and fillers. The novel use of deoxycholic acid injections is also described. The authors strongly think that as options continue to expand, plastic surgeons will benefit from taking an active role in adopting these new innovations.

Botulinum toxin type A products are not interchangeable: a review of the evidence

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) products are injectable biologic medications derived from Clostridium botulinum bacteria. Several different BoNTA products are marketed in various countries, and they are not interchangeable. Differences between products include manufacturing processes, formulations, and the assay methods used to determine units of biological activity. These differences result in a specific set of interactions between each BoNTA product and the tissue injected. Consequently, the products show differences in their in vivo profiles, including preclinical dose response curves and clinical dosing, efficacy, duration, and safety/adverse events. Most, but not all, published studies document these differences, suggesting that individual BoNTA products act differently depending on experimental and clinical conditions, and these differences may not always be predictable. Differentiation through regulatory approvals provides a measure of confidence in safety and efficacy at the specified doses for each approved indication. Moreover, the products differ in the amount of study to which they have been subjected, as evidenced by the number of publications in the peer-reviewed literature and the quantity and quality of clinical studies. Given that BoNTAs are potent biological products that meet important clinical needs, it is critical to recognize that their dosing and product performance are not interchangeable and each product should be used according to manufacturer guidelines.

Understanding the functional anatomy of the frontalis and glabellar complex for optimal aesthetic botulinum toxin type A therapy

BACKGROUND

Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) is approved for the treatment of glabellar lines and also is commonly injected in an off-label fashion in the frontalis (i.e., frontalis epicranius) muscle to improve the appearance of horizontal forehead lines. This study aimed to review and discuss both the anatomy and physiology of the frontalis muscle and its relationship with antagonist muscles in the upper face and to provide a guide for the use of BoNTA to treat forehead rhytides while minimizing the occurrence of complications such as brow ptosis.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted to identify practitioner opinion and clinical publications on the efficacy and safety of BoNTA for aesthetic treatment of the upper face.

RESULTS

The use of BoNTA produces durable improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe horizontal forehead lines. Dose and injection technique must be adjusted and individualized based on the variable anatomy and function/mass of muscles in the forehead and upper face as well as on patient goals. Optimal aesthetic outcomes can be achieved by skillfully balancing the opposing effects of the frontalis muscle and its intricate interactions with the procerus, corrugator supercilii, depressor supercilii, and orbicularis oculi muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BoNTA to improve the aesthetic appearance of horizontal forehead lines is optimized when clinicians take into account variations in frontalis muscle function and position, anatomy of the brow, and proper injection technique when they devise individualized treatment regimens.

A comparative assessment of three formulations of botulinum toxin A for facial rhytides: a systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A is a commonly used biological medication in the field of facial plastic surgery. Currently, there are three distinct formulations of botulinum toxin A, each with their purported benefits and advantages. However, there is considerable confusion as to the relative efficacy and side-effects associated with each formulation. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to systematically assess published studies and perform a meta-analysis to determine if there is a significant advantage of any of the individual formulations.

METHODS/DESIGN

A systematic literature search was performed for all relevant English language randomized controlled trials using Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, European Union (EU) Clinical Trials Register, Cochrane Library databases of clinical trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Inclusion criteria included any randomized controlled trial (RCT) that assessed the use of botulinum toxin for cosmetic purposes. The included articles were also analyzed for bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in RCTs.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review will provide clinicians with an unbiased, high level of evidence of the comparative efficacy of individual preparations of botulinum toxin A.

Current aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice: an evidence-based consensus review

The amount and complexity of scientific and clinical evidence for aesthetic use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has expanded rapidly in recent years, especially for abobotulinumtoxinA, necessitating reassessment of current knowledge about aesthetic use of abobotulinumtoxinA and other BoNT-A preparations. A committee of 13 plastic surgeons, facial plastic surgeons, and dermatologists engaged in a live discussion of information from a systematic literature review and an Internet-based survey of their beliefs and practices. The committee achieved consensus on most issues. It was concluded that doses of different BoNT-A preparations cannot be interconverted with a fixed ratio. The size of the "field of effect" is difficult to measure, and comparisons between preparations have yielded equivocal results. Nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies appears exceedingly rare with currently available BoNT-A preparations and of little concern clinically. BoNT-A dose, injection depth, and injection technique should be adjusted according to the anatomic area being treated and each patient's individual characteristics and goals. Aesthetic use of BoNT-A has a good safety profile. Most adverse events are minor and related to the trauma of injection, although special care is needed in certain anatomic areas. Detailed recommendations for treatment of different anatomic areas are presented. BoNT-A products are often used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (eg, fillers and resurfacing), but little agreement was reached on best practices. The findings reported in this consensus document may serve as a practical guide for aesthetic practitioners as they apply the latest knowledge about BoNT-A in providing their patients with optimal care.

Lower-face and neck antiaging treatment and prevention using onabotulinumtoxin A: the 2010 multidisciplinary French consensus--part 2

BACKGROUND

Onabotulinumtoxin A has been used for many years in the aging face treatment. A survey was organized to identify current practices in France.

OBJECTIVE

To develop consensual recommendations for treating aging lower face and neck with onabotulinumtoxin A.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-seven participants to six regional surveys reviewed practices and techniques for each individual treatment indication. From conference summaries and data from a questionnaire, consensual recommendations were developed.

RESULTS

General considerations, key treatment rules, injection specifics (dose, site, and techniques), associated procedures/treatments, and procedure follow-up were defined by indication, i.e., nasolabial angle, nasal tip repositioning, dilated nostrils, lips and perioral area, Marionette lines and depressor anguli oris, gingival smile, risorius and zygomatic perioral muscles, masseters, chin, and platysma. For the consensus participants, current onabotulinumtoxin A use is a global preventive and corrective treatment. Overall, judicious treatment of multiple sites and adjunctive modalities, such as fillers, peels, and laser, leads to satisfactory results with a youthful, harmonious, animated, and natural-looking face.

CONCLUSION

Years of experience using onabotulinumtoxin A result in sophisticated treatment approaches, more specific targeted injections, and better understanding of lower facial and neck aging, leading to satisfying therapeutic results for patients and clinicians.

Field effect of two commercial preparations of botulinum toxin type A: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The dose equivalence of commonly used commercial preparations of botulinum toxin type A, Dysport (abotulinumtoxinA [ABO] 500 U, Ipsen Biopharm Limited, Wrexham, United Kingdom) and Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA [ONA] 100 U, Allergan, Irvine, CA), remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the field effect for ABO and ONA at dose equivalences of 2.5:1.0 U and 2.0:1.0 U, in both muscular and sweat gland activity.

METHODS

In all, 59 female patients with forehead wrinkles were enrolled. Patients were randomized for dose equivalence between ABO and ONA, group A (2.0:1.0 U, ABO:ONA) or group B (2.5:1.0 U, ABO:ONA) administered in the frontalis muscles. Clinical assessment, Minor test, and electromyography evaluations were performed at baseline, 28 days, and 112 days.

RESULTS

In group B, the field of anhidrotic effect of ABO showed a greater area and larger horizontal diameter than ONA at 28 and 112 days. At maximum frontalis muscle activity (day 112) patients receiving ABO demonstrated greater improvement based on the Wrinkle Severity Scale. No differences were found in frontalis muscle activity at rest between groups A and B based on results of Wrinkle Severity Scale, electromyography, and interindividual variability data at 28 and 112 days.

LIMITATIONS

Currently, there are no objective measurements other than electromyography to evaluate the field effect of botulinum toxin type A in muscles.

CONCLUSION

At a dose equivalence of 2.0:1.0 U (ABO:ONA), similar field effects were found for both muscle and sweat gland activity. At a higher dose equivalence of 2.5:1.0 U (ABO:ONA), injections of ABO showed greater area and larger horizontal diameter in field of anhidrotic effect at 28 and 112 days than ONA.

Comparison of the spread of three botulinum toxin type A preparations

Botulinum toxins are frequently used in esthetics to improve the appearance of facial wrinkles. In this setting, precise localization of the neurotoxin is required to produce the desired clinical effects. Unwanted effects can occur if the neurotoxin diffuses into untargeted muscle. Therefore, a neurotoxin with low and predictable spread would be preferable for esthetic applications. The aim of this study was to investigate the spread of three approved botulinum toxin type A preparations, with and without complexing proteins, by measuring and comparing the size of the anhidrotic halos they produced following injection of equivalent doses in an identical volume into the forehead of patients. The results showed that incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA displayed comparable spread at 6 weeks (maximal area of anhidrosis within 6 weeks) and area under the effect curve (AUEC) over 6 months. However, abobotulinumtoxinA, when assuming a 1:2.5 injection volume ratio, produced a statistically significantly greater maximal area of anhidrosis within 6 weeks and AUEC over 6 months compared with incobotulinumtoxinA. All preparations were well tolerated. The results of this study demonstrate that incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA have comparable spread, while abobotulinumtoxinA has significantly greater spread than incobotulinumtoxinA.

Botulinum toxin in facial rejuvenation: an update

Since its initial approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 20 years ago for the treatment of strabismus, hemifacial spasm, and blepharospasm in adults, botulinum toxin (BTX) has become one of the most frequently requested products in cosmetic rejuvenation around the world. After years of clinical success and consistent safety in the upper face, the use of BTX has expanded and evolved to include increasingly complicated indications. In the hands of adept injectors, the focus has shifted from the treatment of individual dynamic rhytides to shaping, contouring, and sculpting, alone or in combination with other cosmetic procedures, to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the face. Although recent reports have questioned the safety of BTX, 25 years of therapeutic and over 20 years of cosmetic use has demonstrated an impressive record of safety and efficacy when used appropriately by experienced injectors.

Update on botulinum toxin and dermal fillers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The art and science of facial rejuvenation is an ever-evolving field of medicine, as evidenced by the continual development of new surgical and nonsurgical treatment modalities. Over the past 10 years, the use of botulinum toxin and dermal fillers for aesthetic purposes has risen sharply. Herein, we discuss properties of several commonly used injectable products and provide basic instruction for their use toward the goal of achieving facial rejuvenation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The demand for nonsurgical injection-based facial rejuvenation products has risen enormously in recent years. Used independently or concurrently, botulinum toxin and dermal filler agents offer an affordable, minimally invasive approach to facial rejuvenation.

SUMMARY

Botulinum toxin and dermal fillers can be used to diminish facial rhytides, restore facial volume, and sculpt facial contours, thereby achieving an aesthetically pleasing, youthful facial appearance.

Dosing, efficacy and safety plus the use of computerized photography for botulinum toxins type A for upper facial lines

INTRODUCTION

Several studies confirm that botulinum toxins type A (BTX-A) are effective for reducing facial lines caused by hyperactive muscles. Two different commercial types of BTX-A currently available are BTX-A-1 (Botox) and BTX-A-2 (Dysport). This paper reports further comparison of dosing, efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Sites treated: glabellar, horizontal forehead lines and crow's feet. Different dilutions and dosages were studied with BTX-A-1 and BTX-A-2. The reduction of facial lines was evaluated by investigators and patients. Computerized photographic numerical assessment was also studied in determining the efficacy of BTX-A for crow's feet lines.

RESULTS

Study 1: Injecting glabellar lines at doses of BTX-A-1 (30 units) and BTX-A-2 (75 units) (2.5:1 ratio BTX-A2:BTX-A1) showed similar efficacy. Study 2: BTX-A-2 (256 units total) was significantly more effective than BTX-A-1 (64 units total) (i.e. a dose ratio of 4:1) for upper face lines. No differences in the side-effect profiles between the two toxins were observed in either study. Study 3: A computerized photographic numerical assay was an objective assessment of crow's feet severity. Using a dose ratio of BTX-A-2 to BTX-A-1 of 3:1 showed a trend towards BTX-A-2 superiority.

CONCLUSION

Two different botulinum toxins type A were shown to be effective and safe for hyperfunctional facial lines. The choice of dose, dilution and placement is critical for each individual toxin. Computerized photography gave numerical severity scores of crow's feet severity.

Treating glabellar lines with botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex: a review of the science, the clinical data, and patient satisfaction

Botulinum toxin type A treatment is the foundation of minimally invasive aesthetic facial procedures. Clinicians and their patients recognize the important role, both negative and positive, that facial expression, particularly the glabellar frown lines, plays in self-perception, emotional well-being, and perception by others. This article provides up-to-date information on fundamental properties and mechanisms of action of the major approved formulations of botulinum toxin type A, summarizes recent changes in naming conventions (nonproprietary names) mandated by the United States Food and Drug Administration, and describes the reasons for these changes. The request for these changes provides recognition that formulations of botulinum toxins (eg, onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA) are not interchangeable and that dosing recommendations cannot be based on any one single conversion ratio. The extensive safety, tolerability, and efficacy data are summarized in detail, including the patient-reported outcomes that contribute to overall patient satisfaction and probability treatment continuation. Based on this in-depth review, the authors conclude that botulinum toxin type A treatment remains a cornerstone of facial aesthetic treatments, and clinicians must realize that techniques and dosing from one formulation cannot be applied to others, that each patient should undergo a full aesthetic evaluation, and that products and procedures must be selected in the context of individual needs and goals.

[Different botulinum toxins and their specifications]

Botulinum neurotoxin A was the first developed for therapeutic and then esthetic uses, Botox first and then Dysport. These two products differ on a few points, explaining their nonequivalence of units: American and British tests of the mouse LD50 units based on solutions that were not identical and 500microg vs 150microg serum albumin dose in the excipient. The neurotoxin- accessory protein complexes were also different: 900 kDa homogeneous for Botox, 500 kDa heterogeneous for Dysport, giving greater diffusion for Dysport, but this is under debate and could result from an excessive conversion ratio. Clinical comparative studies, often with weak methodology, have defined an ideal ratio between these two products, guaranteeing efficacy, but without an overly pronounced diffusion. In the first publications for neurological and ophthalmological indications, the conversion ratio between Dysport and Botox was high, 4:1, and sometimes higher. However, today, particularly for cosmetic indications, the trend is toward a much lower ratio, 2.5:1, or perhaps less for dyshidrosis. This lower ratio has an economic incidence: Dysport is less expensive and therefore more competitive. The price of Dysport's cosmetic product, Azzalure, compared to the price of Vistabel, which is Botox's cosmetic presentation, has not yet been defined in France. The other A toxins, Xeomin, and the Asian toxins, MyoBloc (botulinum toxin type B), tested compared to Botox, have a slightly lower efficacy.

Impact on facial rejuvenation with dermatological preparations

The treatment options for facial rejuvenation using dermatological, nonsurgical techniques have dramatically increased in the past 10 years. This follows the introduction of botulinum toxin and a variety of dermal fillers. The public interest in noninvasive treatments has changed the market beyond recognition with more physicians involved in providing services to satiate the demand. The impact on the public and medical profession is discussed.

Dysport: pharmacological properties and factors that influence toxin action

The pharmacological properties of Dysport that influence toxin action are reviewed and compared with other botulinum toxin products. In particular, the subject of diffusion is examined and discussed based upon the evidence that currently exists, both from laboratory studies and from clinical data. Diffusion of botulinum toxin products is not related to the size of the toxin complex in the product since the complex dissociates under physiological conditions, releasing the naked neurotoxin to act. The active neurotoxin in Type A products is the same and therefore diffusion is equal when equal doses are administered.