Measurement of glare sensitivity in cataract patients using low-contrast letter charts

[Methods of surgical treatment of keratectasia and analysis of postsurgical quality of vision]

Keratectasias are non-inflammatory dystrophic diseases of the cornea characterized by progressive bilateral thinning of the cornea that lead to deterioration in the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of vision reducing patient's quality of life. The changes can be asymmetrical and destructive. A number of surgeries have been proposed to reduce the negative effects of keratectasia including penetrating keratoplasty and its modifications, implantation of corneal ring segments, corneal cross-linking - alone and in combination with other methods, intrastromal keratoplasty. These methods can improve visual acuity to a certain degree and help slow the progression of keratectasia. This article studies various surgical methods used for treating keratectasia and analyses possible assessment of the quality of vision before and after the treatment.

Impact of Oncoming Headlight Glare With Cataracts: A Pilot Study

Purpose: Oncoming headlight glare (HLG) reduces the visibility of objects on the road and may affect the safety of nighttime driving. With cataracts, the impact of oncoming HLG is expected to be more severe. We used our custom HLG simulator in a driving simulator to measure the impact of HLG on pedestrian detection by normal vision subjects with simulated mild cataracts and by patients with real cataracts. Methods: Five normal vision subjects drove nighttime scenarios under two HLG conditions (with and without HLG: HLGY and HLGN, respectively), and three vision conditions (with plano lens, simulated mild cataract, and optically blurred clip-on). Mild cataract was simulated by applying a 0.8 Bangerter diffusion foil to clip-on plano lenses. The visual acuity with the optically blurred lenses was individually chosen to match the visual acuity with the simulated cataract clip-ons under HLGN. Each nighttime driving scenario contains 24 pedestrian encounters, encompassing four pedestrian types; walking along the left side of the road, walking along the right side of the road, crossing the road from left to right, and crossing the road from right to left. Pedestrian detection performances of five patients with mild real cataracts were measured using the same setup. The cataract patients were tested only in HLGY and HLGN conditions. Participants' visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were also measured in the simulator with and without stationary HLG. Results: For normal vision subjects, both the presence of oncoming HLG and wearing the simulated cataract clip-on reduced pedestrian detection performance. The subjects performed worst in events where the pedestrian crossed from the left, followed by events where the pedestrian crossed from the right. Significant interactions between HLG condition and other factors were also found: (1) the impact of oncoming HLG with the simulated cataract clip-on was larger than with the plano lens clip-on, (2) the impact of oncoming HLG was larger with the optically blurred clip-on than with the plano lens clip-on, but smaller than with the simulated cataract clip-on, and (3) the impact was larger for the pedestrians that crossed from the left than those that crossed from the right, and for the pedestrians walking along the left side of the road than walking along the right side of the road, suggesting that the pedestrian proximity to the glare source contributed to the performance reduction. Under HLGN, almost no pedestrians were missed with the plano lens or the simulated cataract clip-on (0 and 0.5%, respectively), but under HLGY, the rate of pedestrian misses increased to 0.5 and 6%, respectively. With the optically blurred clip-on, the percent of missed pedestrians under HLGN and HLGY did not change much (5% and 6%, respectively). Untimely response rate increased under HLGY with the plano lens and simulated cataract clip-ons, but the increase with the simulated cataract clip-on was significantly larger than with the plano lens clip-on. The contrast sensitivity with the simulated cataract clip-on was significantly degraded under HLGY. The visual acuity with the plano lens clip-on was significantly improved under HLGY, possibly due to pupil myosis. The impact of HLG measured for real cataract patients was similar to the impact on performance of normal vision subjects with simulated cataract clip-ons. Conclusion: Even with mild (simulated or real) cataracts, a substantial negative effect of oncoming HLG was measurable in the detection of crossing and walking-along pedestrians. The lowered pedestrian detection rates and longer response times with HLGY demonstrate a possible risk that oncoming HLG poses to patients driving with cataracts.

Glare susceptibility test results correlate with temporal safety margin when executing turns across approaching vehicles in simulated low-sun conditions

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of a laboratory glare susceptibility test with the execution of turns at an intersection (turns that required the driver to cross a lane containing approaching traffic). We measured glare susceptibility by means of low and high-contrast letter charts with and without a glare source. Driving performance in the absence and presence of simulated low sun was assessed using a simulator. In particular, we measured the difference between the time taken to complete a turn across the path of an approaching vehicle and the time to collision (TTC) with the approaching vehicle (the safety margin). The presence of glare resulted in a significant reduction in the safety margin used by drivers (by 0.65 s on average) and the mean number of collisions was significantly higher in the glare conditions than in the non-glare conditions. The effect of glare was larger for low-contrast than for high-contrast oncoming vehicles. Older drivers (45-60 years) had a significantly greater reduction in safety margin than younger drivers (19-29 years), though there was a large inter-individual variability in both age groups. We suggest that the reduction in retinal image contrast caused by low-sun caused drivers to overestimate the TTC with approaching vehicles.

Treated amblyopes remain deficient in spatial vision: a contrast sensitivity and external noise study

To evaluate residual spatial vision deficits in treated amblyopia, we recruited five clinically treated amblyopes (mean age=10.6 years). Contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) in both the previously amblyopic eyes (pAE; visual acuity=0.944+/-0.019 MAR) and fellow eyes (pFE; visual acuity=0.936+/-0.021 MAR) were measured using a standard psychophysical procedure for all the subjects. The results indicated that the treated amblyopes remained deficient in spatial vision, especially at high spatial frequencies, although their Snellen visual acuity had become normal in the pAEs. To identify the mechanisms underlying spatial vision deficits of treated amblyopes, threshold vs external noise contrast (TvC) functions--the signal contrast necessary for the subject to maintain a threshold performance level in varying amounts of external noise ("TV snow")--were measured in both eyes of four of the subjects in a sine-wave grating detection task at several spatial frequencies. Two mechanisms of amblyopia were identified: increased internal noise at low to medium spatial frequencies, and both increased internal noise and increased impact of external noise at high spatial frequencies. We suggest that, in addition to visual acuity, other tests of spatial vision (e.g., CSF, TvC) should be used to assess treatment outcomes of amblyopia therapies. Training in intermediate and high spatial frequencies may be necessary to fully recover spatial vision in amblyopia in addition to the occlusion therapy.

Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: The Nexus Between Corneal Wavefront Aberrations and Visual Performance

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and optical performance after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus to normal patients and to examine the relationship between corneal wavefront aberrations and visual performance in patients with PK.

METHODS

Visual performance testing, with optimal refractive correction, included low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity with and without glare, and high contrast visual acuity. Corneal first surface wavefront aberrations were calculated from EyeSys topography data using VOL-Pro software v7.00 for a 4.0-mm pupil as a 10th order Zernike expansion and converted into single value metrics. Normal patients were compared to patients with PK using analysis of variance, and linear regression was used to compare wavefront aberration metrics to visual performance.

RESULTS

Patients with PK (n=14, age 41.6 +/- 7.0 years) and normal patients (n=14, age 36.7-9.0 years) were of similar age (F(1, 26) = 2.54, P = .12). Normal patients saw significantly better on all visual performance measures and had better optical performance for total higher order root-mean-square corneal wavefront aberration (mean-SD): PK, 0.67 +/- 0.41 microm; normal, 0.09 +/- 0.02 microm (F(1,26) = 28.41, P < .001) and across all Zernike orders and modes. Wavefront aberrations in PK eyes were dominated by trefoil 0.35 +/- 0.27 microm, coma 0.47 +/- 0.37 microm, spherical aberration 0.17 +/- 0.10 microm, and tetrafoil 0.12 +/- 0.07 microm. The relationships between corneal wavefront aberration and visual performance metrics were strongest for LCVA = 0.30-0.98 Pupil fraction for wavefront (tessellation) -0.04 Half width at half height, R2=0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, patients with PK had poorer visual performance compared to normal patients, which is due to increased corneal wavefront aberrations. Outcomes research in corneal transplantation should include measurement of wavefront aberrations and visual performance in the contrast domain.

Influence of Exposure Time and Pupil Size on a Shack-Hartmann Metric of Forward Scatter

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of exposure time and pupil size on a Shack-Hartmann (S/H) derived metric of forward scatter (MAX_SD) using a physical model of nuclear cataract.

METHODS

A physical model eye was developed and mounted to a S/H wavefront sensor. The eye model consisted of a lens, variable pupil, simulated cataract, and retina. Located behind the pupil, a cuvette contained one of five polystyrene microsphere solutions simulating five levels of nuclear cataract severity. Cataract severity was described using a S/H derived metric of forward scatter (MAX SD), which measures aspects of forward scatter contained in the S/H lenslet point spread functions (PSF). To determine the impact of exposure time and pupil size, measurements of MAX_SD were regressed against cataract severity for three different exposure times and three different pupil sizes.

RESULTS

MAX_SD was well correlated to cataract severity. Exposure time had the largest influence, and pupil size had the smallest influence on the forward scatter metric. When pupil size and exposure time were allowed to vary and image saturation was allowed to occur, MAX SD explained 83% of the variance in cataract severity. Excluding images where saturation occurred, holding optimal exposure time constant, and varying pupil size, MAX_SD explained 97% of the variance in cataract severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of the forward scatter metric derived from S/H measurements to predict cataract severity for a longitudinal study is optimized by selecting a patient-specific exposure at the initial cataract assessment to avoid saturation and maximize the dynamic range of the system. This patient-specific exposure should be used in all future visits.

Contrast and glare testing in keratoconus and after penetrating keratoplasty

AIM

To compare the performance of keratoconus, penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and control subjects on clinical tests of contrast and glare vision, to determine whether differences in vision were independent of visual acuity (VA), and thereby establish which vision tests are the most useful for outcome studies of PK for keratoconus.

METHODS

All PK subjects had keratoconus before grafting and no subjects had any other eye disease. The keratoconus (n = 11, age 35.0 (SD 11.1) years), forme fruste keratoconus (n = 6, 33.0 (13.0)), PK (n = 21, 41.2 (7.9)), and control (n = 24, 33.7 (8.6)) groups were similar in age. Vision testing, conducted with optimal refractive correction in place, included low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity (PRCS) both with and without glare, as well as VA.

RESULTS

Normal subjects saw better than PK subjects who in turn saw better than keratoconus subjects on all raw measures. However, when adjusted for VA, the normal group only saw significantly better than the keratoconus group on LCVA (low contrast loss 0.05 (0.04) v 0.15 (0.12), F(2,48) = 6.16; p<0.01, post hoc Sheffé p<0.05), and the decrements to glare were no worse than for normals. The forme fruste keratoconus group were indistinguishable from normals on all measures.

CONCLUSIONS

PK subjects have superior vision to keratoconus subjects, but not as good as normal subjects. Including mild keratoconus subjects within a keratoconus group could confound these differences in vision. While VA is an excellent test for comparing normal, keratoconus and PK groups, additional information can be provided by LCVA and PRCS, but not by glare testing. Outcomes research into keratoconus management should include a measure in the contrast domain.

Reproducibility of morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing with the Visual Capacity Analyzer

PURPOSE

To determine the reproducibility of morphoscopic contrast sensitivity test values in healthy subjects using the Visual Capacity Analyzer (VCA) (L2 Informatique).

SETTING

Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yong-Dong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

METHODS

Five healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. With the VCA, 1 eye of each person was tested with different sized letters displayed on a computer screen at 11 spatial frequencies ranging from low (3.0 cycles/deg [cpd]) to high (30.0 cpd). The measurement was repeated 5 times under 2 screen luminance levels (maximum and 3 cd/m2).

RESULTS

Under maximum luminance background, the coefficient of variation (CV) and reliability coefficient (RC) at the spatial frequencies examined ranged from 4.3% to 35.0% and 89.1% to 99.8%, respectively. Under a screen luminance of 3 cd/m2, the CV ranged from 0.5% to 15.9% and the RC, from 97.5% to 100.0%.

CONCLUSION

At the spatial frequencies examined, morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing using the VCA had a high level of reproducibility and may be useful in measuring a patient's visual function in the actual environment.

Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery

A certain percentage of patients complain of "glare" at night after undergoing a refractive surgical procedure. When patients speak of glare they are, technically, describing a decrease in quality of vision secondary to glare disability, decreased contrast sensitivity, and image degradations, or more succinctly, "night vision disturbances." The definitions, differences, and methods of measurement of such vision disturbances after refractive surgery are described in our article. In most cases of corneal refractive surgery, there is a significant increase in vision disturbances immediately following the procedure. The majority of patients improve between 6 months to 1 year post-surgery. The relation between pupil size and the optical clear zone are most important in minimizing these disturbances in RK. In PRK and LASIK, pupil size and the ablation diameter size and location are the major factors involved. Treatment options for disabling glare are also discussed. With the exponential increase of patients having refractive surgery, the increase of patients complaining of scotopic or mesopic vision disturbances may become a major public health issue in the near future. Currently, however, there are no gold-standard clinical tests available to measure glare disability, contrast sensitivity, or image degradations. Standardization is essential for objective measurement and follow-up to further our understanding of the effects of these surgeries on the optical system and thus, hopefully, allow for modification of our techniques to decrease or eliminate post-refractive vision disturbances.

Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test

PURPOSE

To define normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in different age groups.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

METHODS

Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in 87 persons (60 women and 27 men) with a mean age of 34.5 years +/- 20.8 (SD) (range 6 to 75 years). Results were studied by age group (years): 6 to 9, 10 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 and older. Of 163 eyes, both were healthy in 76 persons and 1 was healthy in 11. Study participants consisted of members of the staff of the Kuopio University Hospital Eye Clinic, medical students at the Kuopio University, and patients of the Strabismus and General Ophthalmology Units of the Eye Clinic and their accompanying persons. Two test distances were used: 1 m and 3 m. Eyes were tested individually; thereafter, the test was done binocularly.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in logarithmic contrast sensitivity values among the age groups except on the test of the left eye at 1 m. The P values for the right eye at 1 m and 3 m, left eye at 1 m and 3 m, and both eyes at 1 m and 3 m were 0.003, 0.002, 0.19, 0.043, 0.037, and 0.003, respectively. The mean test results in 1 eye varied from 1.68 in the 60 year and older group to 1.84 in the 20 to 29 and 30 to 39 year groups. Binocularly, the variation was from 1.73 in the 40 year group to 1.99 in the 30 year group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test is a quick and reliable method in a clinical setting. Normal values of the test can be of help in evaluating cataract patients or patients having refractive surgery.

Visual performance requirements for post-PRK police recruits

BACKGROUND: New Zealand Police regulations (1996) allow the unaided visual acuity requirement of 6/12 to be achieved following refractive surgery (except radial keratotomy or keratoplasty) provided applicants also achieve normal (95 per cent confidence limit data from the literature): glare disability, contrast sensitivity, and low luminance visual acuity, one year or more after treatment. METHODS: To confirm the limits adopted, 80 young normal adults were subjected to the tests in the regulations. To examine the operation of the current standards, the results of 34 post-photorefractive keratectomy (post-PRK) police applicants are reported. Glare disability was the loss of high contrast visual acuity (VA) with the Mentor Brightness Acuity Tester at medium intensity. Contrast sensitivity (CS) was examined using both Melbourne Edge Test thresholds and the VA difference between high and low contrast Bailey-Lovie charts. Low luminance VA was measured using high contrast Bailey-Lovie charts viewed through a one per cent transmittance filter. RESULTS: The 95 per cent confidence limits found for normal performance were as follows. Glare disability: no more than 10 letters worse than VA without glare. Contrast sensitivity: no more than 12 letters difference between high contrast and low contrast letter acuity together with an edge contrast threshold of not less than 20 dB (CS = 100). These results were close to the values adopted for the current standard. The 95 per cent confidence limit for low luminance VA was a loss of 24 letters (almost five lines) and not the three lines of loss estimated from the literature. Two of the 34 post-PRK applicants failed. One was unable to achieve 6/6 acuity with best refraction. The second could not meet the low luminance VA limit (loss no more than three lines). No failures have been due to glare disability or poor contrast sensitivity even though one applicant had obvious corneal haze.

Management of cataract

Images