The effects of clozapine on behavioural responses to the selective 'D1-like' dopamine receptor agonist, A 68930, and to the selective 'D2-like' agonist, RU 24213

Examination of clozapine and haloperidol in improving ketamine-induced deficits in an incremental repeated acquisition procedure in BALB/c mice

RATIONALE

Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, causes locomotor hyperactivity, aberrant prepulse inhibition and impaired reversal learning among other deficits. There are numerous clinical and pre-clinically uses of NMDAR antagonists and a growing need to characterize their neurobehavioral effects.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was designed to characterize 1) ketamine's effect on incremental repeated acquisition (IRA), a procedure that taps multiple neurobehavioral functions and has performance measures correlated with IQ in humans, and 2) the extent to which clozapine (CLZ) and haloperidol (HAL) block ketamine's detrimental effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In experiment 1 (Exp. 1), BALB/c mice nose-poked under an IRA procedure for sucrose pellets. Systemic ketamine (1-30 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased measures of cognitive and motor function. CLZ pretreatment (CLZ 0.1-4.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated ketamine-induced (30 mg/kg) deficits; the effective dose range of CLZ was 0.3-1.0 mg/kg. HAL pretreatment (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) did not attenuate any ketamine-induced deficits. In experiment 2 (Exp. 2), BALB/c mice lever-pressed under an IRA procedure for sweetened condensed milk. Ketamine (30 mg/kg) produced a global impairment in the IRA procedure and CLZ pretreatment (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently attenuated that impairment; motor-based performance recovered to a greater extent than cognitive performance. When tested alone, these doses of CLZ had little effect on IRA performance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the notion that CLZ is more effective than HAL at blocking ketamine-induced deficits. The IRA procedure may be beneficial for distinguishing the efficacy of drugs that seek to alleviate deficits in complex behavior that result from acute NMDAR antagonism.

Differential response of central dopaminergic system in acute and chronic unpredictable stress models in rats

We aimed to evaluate the response of dopaminergic system in acute stress (AS) and chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) by measuring dopamine (DA) levels, its receptor densities in the frontal cortex, striatum, hippocampus, amygdala and orbito-frontal cortex regions of rat brain, and investigated the corresponding behavioral locomotor changes. Involvement of D(1) receptor was also examined during AS and CUS using A 68930, a D(1) selective agonist. Rats were exposed to AS (single immobilization for 150 min) and CUS (two different stressors for 7 days). AS significantly decreased the DA levels in the striatum and hippocampus, and A 68930 pretreatment significantly reverted these changes. However, in the frontal cortex significantly increased DA levels were remain unchanged following A 68930. CUS led to a decrease of DA levels in the frontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus, which were normalized by A 68930. Saturation radioligand binding assays revealed a significant decrease in the number of D(1)-like receptors in the frontal cortex during CUS, which were further decreased by A 68930 pretreatment. However, in the striatum and hippocampus, A 68930 pretreatment reduced the CUS induced increase in the number of D(1)-like receptors. No significant changes were observed in the amygdala and orbito-frontal cortex during AS and CUS, while D(2)-like receptors were unchanged in all the brain regions studied. Locomotor activity was significantly decreased in both the stress models, A 68930 pretreatment significantly increased stereotypic counts and horizontal activity. Thus, present investigation provide insights into the differential regional response of dopaminergic system during AS and CUS. Further, neurochemical and behavioral effects of D(1) agonist pretreatment suggest specific modulatory role of D(1) receptor under such stressful episodes.

Behavioral effects of clozapine and dopamine receptor subtypes

The atypical neuroleptic clozapine (CLZ) is an extremely effective antipsychotic that produces relatively few motoric side effects. However, CLZ displays limited antagonism at the dopamine (DA) D2 receptor, the receptor commonly thought to mediate the antipsychotic activity of neuroleptics. The mechanism of action behind the efficacy of CLZ remains to be determined. Miller, Wickens and Beninger [Progr. Neurobiol., 34, 143-184 (1990)] propose a "D1 hypothesis of antipsychotic action" that may explain the antipsychotic effects of CLZ. This hypothesis is built on the interactions between D2, cholinergic and D1 mechanisms in the striatum. These authors assert that although typical neuroleptics block D2 receptors, it is through an indirect action on D1 receptors that their antipsychotic action is manifest. The extra-pyramidal side effects produced by typical neuroleptics are hypothesized to be due to an indirect action on cholinergic receptors. It is argued that the anticholinergic properties of CLZ negate the D2 (motor side effects) action of CLZ, allowing CLZ to diminish psychotic symptoms through a direct action on D1 receptors. Thus, CLZ may function as a D1 receptor antagonist in behavioral paradigms. The current paper reviews and compares the behavioral profile of CLZ to those produced by D2- and D1-selective antagonists with specific reference to unconditioned and conditioned behaviors in order to more fully evaluate the "D1 hypothesis of CLZ action". Although the actions of CLZ remain unique, they do share some striking similarities with D1 receptor antagonists especially in tests of unconditioned behavior, possibly implicating the D1 receptor in the action of this antipsychotic drug.

Comparison of the new atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and ICI 204,636 with clozapine on behavioural responses to the selective "D1-like" dopamine receptor agonist A 68930 and selective "D2-like" agonist RU 24213

The effects of the putative atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and ICI 204,636 on behavioural responses to the selective "D2-like" dopamine receptor agonist RU 24213 and to the selective "D1-like" agonist A 68930 were compared with those of the prototype atypical antipsychotic clozapine, the selective D1-like antagonist SCH 23390 and the selective D2-like antagonist YM 09151-2. Olanzapine (0.4-2.0 mg/kg) and ICI 204,636 (4.0-36.0 mg/kg), like clozapine (4.0-36.0 mg/kg) and SCH 23390 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg), effected at best modest reduction in typical sniffing and locomotor responses and, with the exception of ICI 204,636, released episodes of atypical myoclonic jerking to RU 24213 (12.5 mg/kg); a high dose of olanzapine (10.0 mg/kg), like YM 09151-2 (0.005-0.5 mg/kg), blocked all responsivity to RU 24213. Conversely, olanzapine (0.4-2.0 mg/kg) and ICI 204,636 (4.0-36.0 mg/kg), like clozapine (4.0-12.0 mg/kg) and SCH 23390 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg), readily blocked typical grooming responses to A 68930 (0.5 mg/kg); YM 09151-2 failed to block grooming and exerted more variable effects. Olanzapine and, to a lesser extent, ICI 204,636 share with clozapine a preferential action to attenuate D1-mediated function; given their lack of selective affinity for D1-like receptors, this common effect may be exerted at an alternative level of synaptic function. The action of olanzapine and particularly ICI 204,636 to release additional episodes of atypical vacuous chewing to A 68930 indicates some deviation from a wholly clozapine-like profile, the clinical significance of which remains to be specified.

Pharmacological characterization of behavioural responses to SK&F 83959 in relation to 'D1-like' dopamine receptors not linked to adenylyl cyclase

1. Behavioural responses to the new benzazepine derivative, SK&F 83959, a compound that both fails to stimulate adenylyl cyclase and inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase induced by dopamine, were characterized in detail. 2. In rat striatal membrane preparations, radioligand binding studies with [3H]-SCH 23390 and [3H]-spiperone indicated SK&F 83959 had a high affinity and >250 fold selectivity for D1 over D2 receptors. 3. Using a rapid time-sampling behavioural check list technique, SK&F 83959 (0.01-1.25 mg kg(-1)) induced grooming in the manner of all known D1 receptor agonists, together with some vacuous chewing, which declined at higher doses with the emergence of directed chewing and rearing as an adjunct to prominent sniffing; no stereotyped behavioural was evident. 4. Grooming to SK&F 83959 (0.05 mg kg(-1)) was blocked by the selective D1 receptor antagonists, SCH 23390 (0.01-1.0 mg kg(-1)) and BW 737C (0.04-5.0 mg kg(-1)) and was attenuated by the selective D2 receptor antagonist, YM 09151-2 (0.005-0.5 mg kg(-1)); vacuous chewing to SK&F 83959 was not influenced by either SCH 23390 or BW 737C and was enhanced by YM 09151-2. 5. The paradoxical induction of typical D1 receptor agonist-induced grooming by SK&F 83959, an agent satisfying criteria for a D1 receptor antagonist as classically defined, together with its blockade by typical D1 antagonists, strongly suggests mediation via a 'D1-like' site that appears to respond similarly to agents independent of whether they exert agonist or antagonist actions at the classical adenylyl cyclase-coupled D1 receptor. This direct functional evidence for a 'D1-like' site that is not linked to adenylyl cyclase readily complements neurochemical data suggesting the existence of a cyclase-independent 'D1-like' receptor that may be coupled to phosphoinositide hydrolysis.

The antisecretory effects of clozapine, a dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, are blocked by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390

Dopaminergic compounds affect gastric secretion and response to experimental gastric mucosal injury. We showed previously that the novel dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, clozapine, significantly reduces gastric acid secretion and restraint stress-induced gastric lesions. Because the selectivity of clozapine for D4 receptors has recently been questioned, we tested the ability of a known D1 receptor blocker, SCH23390, to affect clozapine-induced reduction in gastric acid secretion. SCH23390 given i.p. or i.c.v., at doses that did not affect gastric acid secretion, significantly blocked the anti-secretory effect of clozapine, administered either peripherally or centrally. These data suggest that neither clozapine nor SCH23390 exhibit as high a degree of selectivity for the dopamine D4 and D1 receptor, respectively, as previously believed.