Discrimination by benextramine between the NPY-Y1 receptor subtypes present in rabbit isolated vas deferens and saphenous vein

Discovery of Multi-Target Agents for Neurological Diseases via Ligand Design

The incidence of neurological disorders in the developed world is rising in concert with an increase in human life expectancy, due in large part to better nutrition and health care. Even as drug discovery efforts are refocused on these disorders, there has been a dearth in the introduction of new disease-modifying therapies to prevent or delay their onset, or reverse their progression. Mounting evidence points to complex and heterogeneous etiopathologies that underlie these diseases. Therefore, it is unlikely that disorders in this class will be mitigated by any single drug that acts exclusively on a single pathway or target. The rational design of novel drug entities with the ability to simultaneously address multiple drug targets of a complex pathophysiology has recently emerged as a new paradigm in drug discovery. Similarly to the concept of multi-target agents within the psychopharmacology field, ligand design has gained an increasing prominence within the medicinal chemistry community. In this chapter we discuss several examples of select chemical scaffolds (polyamines, alkylxanthines, and propargyl carbamates) wherein these concepts were applied to develop novel drug candidates for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Marked neuropeptide Y-induced contractions via NPY-Y1 receptor and its desensitization in rat veins

The aim of this study was to investigate neuropeptide Y (NPY)-induced vasoconstrictions in rat blood vessels and which NPY receptor subtype is involved in vasoconstrictions. NPY produced marked contractions in rat common jugular, brachial, portal, femoral and tail veins, and vena cava inferior, whereas it produced little or no contractions in rat common carotid, brachial, femoral and tail arteries, and thoracic and abdominal aortae. The maximal NPY-induced contractions were larger than maximal phenylephrine (PE)-induced contractions in the veins. These NPY-induced contractions were blocked by the Y1 antagonists, SRL-21, and BIBP3226 but not by the Y5 antagonist, L-152804. A Y2 agonist, NPY (13-36), did not produce contractions. RT-PCR showed that NPY-Y1 was the only receptor subtype in the veins indicating that NPY-induced contractions are mediated through the Y1 receptor. Pretreatment with NPY showed a rapid and long-lasting desensitization of these contractions. The marked NPY-induced contractions and its desensitization in the veins suggest the physiological relevance of NPY in the venous circulation.

Functional methods for quantifying agonists and antagonists

The development of occupancy theory has allowed the formulation of a series of mathematical models that describe the interaction of agonists and antagonists with their receptors, in terms of affinity and efficacy. These models provide a framework for the analysis and interpretation of E/[A] curve data and have proved to be useful tools in quantitative pharmacology. Unfortunately, despite the proven utility of this approach and the widespread availability of powerful computer-based curve-fitting programs [BMDP (41), Microsoft Excel. etc.], which greatly facilitate analysis, the application of mathematical modeling remains the exception rather than the rule in pharmacological studies.

Neuropeptide Y-mediated constriction and dilation in rat middle cerebral arteries

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is an important vasoconstrictor in the cerebral circulation. Its constrictor response is because of activation of NPY receptors on the vascular smooth muscle (VSM). Little is known regarding the effects of NPY on the endothelium. In the current study, the authors tested the hypothesis that NPY can either constrict or dilate rat middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). Constriction is elicited by stimulating receptors on the VSM; dilation is elicited by stimulating receptors on the endothelium. Middle cerebral arteries were isolated, cannulated with micropipettes, pressurized to 85 mm Hg, and luminally perfused. The extraluminal application of NPY (mixed agonist), [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY (Y1 agonist), or NPY-[13-36] (Y2 agonist) produced concentration-dependent constrictions. BIBP 3226 (Y1 selective antagonist) significantly attenuated the NPY- and [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY-induced constrictions. The luminal application of NPY, [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY, and NPY-[13-36] produced concentration-dependent dilations of MCAs. The maximum dilation produced by the NPY receptor agonists was approximately 40% of the dilation elicited by the luminal administration of 10(-5) mol/L ATP. Dilations elicited by luminal NPY, [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY, or NPY-[13-36] were abolished by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with 10(-5) mol/L Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or removal of the endothelium. Dilations produced by luminal NPY or luminal [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY were not affected by BIBP 3226. Stimulation of NPY receptors on vascular smooth muscle constricted MCAs. Stimulation of an NPY receptor other than the Y1 subtype on endothelium dilated the MCAs by releasing nitric oxide.

Sympathetic and parasympathetic interaction in vascular and secretory control of salivary glands in anaesthetised dogs

The present study was undertaken to examine sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions in the regulation of salivary gland function, with special reference to the possible role of the sympathetic cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY). In dogs anaesthetised with pentobarbitone, electrical stimulation of the parasympathetic nerve to the submandibular gland evoked an increase in glandular blood flow and salivary secretion. Sympathetic nerve stimulation evoked a significant prolonged attenuation of vasodilator and secretory responses to subsequent parasympathetic stimulation. This attenuation was not significantly altered by alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Systemic administration of the sympathetic cotransmitter, NPY, mimicked the effect of the sympathetic stimulation by significantly attenuating vasodilatation and salivary secretion. The NPY Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu31, Pro34]NPY and the specific NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu28, Leu31]NPY 24-36 both significantly attenuated the vasodilatation and salivary secretion evoked by stimulation of the parasympathetic nerve. The NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, GR231118 significantly antagonised the attenuation of vasodilatation caused by both sympathetic stimulation and the NPY Y1 receptor agonist. GR231118 also inhibited the pressor response of NPY. Intra-arterial injection of methacholine and stimulation of the parasympathetic nerve both caused local vasodilatation in the gland which was significantly attenuated by pretreatment with sympathetic stimulation or the NPY Y1 agonist. The NPY Y2-specific agonist did not attenuate methacholine-induced vasodilatation but did attenuate vasodilatation evoked by parasympathetic stimulation. The results indicate that NPY as a sympathetic cotransmitter may have a role in the regulation of vascular secretory function of salivary glands.

Heterogeneity of prejunctional NPY receptor-mediated inhibition of cardiac neurotransmission

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been proposed as the candidate inhibitory peptide mediating interactions between sympathetic and vagal neurotransmission in several species, including man. Here, we have defined the NPY receptors involved in modulation of cardiac autonomic neurotransmission using receptor-selective agonists and antagonists in the rabbit and guinea-pig isolated right atria. In isolated atrial preparations, sympathetically-mediated tachycardia (ST; with atropine 1 microM) or vagally-mediated bradycardia (VB; with propranolol 0.1-1 microM) in response to electrical field stimulation (EFS, 1-4 pulses) were tested 0-30 min after incubation with single concentrations of vehicle, NPY (0.01-10 microM), the Y2 receptor agonist N-Acetyl-[Leu28,31]NPY(24-36) (termed N-A[L]NPY(24-36)) or the Y1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (LP). The effect of NPY on the concentration-chronotropic response curves to isoprenaline and bethanechol were also assessed. Guinea-pig atria: NPY and N-A[L]NPY(24-36) caused concentration-dependent inhibition of VB and ST to EFS. Both peptides caused maximal inhibition of VB and ST within 10 min incubation and this remained constant. LP caused a concentration-dependent, transient inhibition of ST which was antagonized by the Y1-receptor antagonist GR231118 (0.3 microM), with apparent competitive kinetics. Rabbit atria: NPY (1 or 10 microM) had no effect on VB at any time point, but both NPY and LP caused a transient (approximately 10 min) inhibition of sympathetic tachycardia. This inhibition could be prevented by 0.3 microM GR231118. N-A[L]NPY(24-36) had no effect on ST. NPY had no effect on the response to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation by isoprenaline nor muscarinic-receptor stimulation by bethanechol in either species. Thus, in the guinea-pig, NPY causes a stable inhibition of both VB and ST to EFS via Y2 receptors and transient inhibition of ST via Y1 receptors. In contrast in the rabbit, NPY has no effect on the cardiac vagus and prejunctional inhibition of ST is transient and mediated by a Y1-like receptor (rather than Y2). Therefore it would be surprising if NPY plays a functional role in modulation of cardiac neurotransmission in the rabbit.

Analysis of receptor inactivation experiments with the operational model of agonism yields correlated estimates of agonist affinity and efficacy

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the operational model of agonism can yield independent estimates of agonist affinity (pK(A)) and efficacy (log tau) when Furchgott's method of irreversible receptor inactivation is employed. For this purpose, the interaction between noradrenaline and phenoxybenzamine was studied in rat small mesenteric artery using a paired-curve design. Phenoxybenzamine pretreatment produced a significant rightward shift and depression of the upper asymptote of the noradrenaline concentration-effect (E/[A]) curve. Although the operational model of agonism appeared to provide an adequate fit of the individual E/[A] curves, a highly significant correlation was found between the estimates of pK(A )and log tau (r = -0.80, p < 0.0001), inconsistent with the assumption that affinity and efficacy are independent parameters (best line fit: pK(A) = -0.96 x log tau + 6.75). The pK(A) and log tau estimates were not correlated with either the pEC50s of the control curves or upper asymptotes of the phenoxybenzamine-treated curves. Simulations showed that the correlation between affinity and efficacy can be explained by the effect on the outcome of the analysis of random errors in the response measurements. Therefore, although in theory the operational model of agonism should provide independent estimates of agonist affinity and efficacy, this is unlikely to be the case with experimental data.

Bioassays for NPY receptors: old and new

Classical pharmacology performed on isolated organ preparations is an essential tool for receptor characterization and classification. Basic pharmacological parameters (e.g. ED50, ID50, pD2, pA2 as measures of apparent affinities) obtained by relating the agent concentration with the biological effect are the final results of the various steps required for drug action and necessarily reflect the complex mechanisms of cell function. Results obtained with bioassays are therefore a useful and essential part in the assessment of endogenous systems, in the present case, the NPY family of peptides and their receptors. An attempt has been made, in the present review, to present a choice of isolated organs that may provide a starting point towards the construction of a solid classical pharmacology of receptors for NPY and congeners. Some of these organs appear to be 'monoreceptor systems' (e.g. the rabbit saphenous vein) whose response is contributed by a single receptor type, others (e.g. the rat colon) are 'multiple receptor systems' and their pharmacology is much too complex and requires the use of a variety of compounds from the naturally occuring peptides, to some selective agonists and when available, specific and selective antagonists. Such compounds have been utilised by us and other workers to detect specific biological responses to NPY and congeners in peripheral tissues: such responses have been quantified, carefully analysed in pharmacological terms and characterized as biological effects mediated by Y1 (the rabbit saphenous vein), Y2 (dog saphenous vein, rat vas deferens, rat colon), Y4 (rat colon) and Y5 (rabbit ileum) receptors. Compared to findings obtained with binding assays and molecular biology experiments, the results of the bioassays show very interesting similarities. Much remains however to be done in view of providing the classical pharmacological bases that are needed in the field of NPY.

BIBP3226 inhibits neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide potentiated neurogenic vasoconstriction

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) potentiates the contractile response of the rat caudal artery to adrenergic nerve stimulation in-vitro. The NPY Y1 selective antagonist BIBP3226 ((R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-argininami de), inhibited the vascular effects of NPY in rat caudal artery preparations in-vitro (IC50 =126 nM). BIBP3226 also inhibited the effects of the selective Y1 agonist [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and completely abolished the effects of avian pancreatic polypeptide that was shown to be capable of potentiating neurogenic vasoconstriction in this preparation. These effects were reversible and are most likely mediated by the Y1 receptor subtype since we failed to observe any functional evidence of a Y2 receptor subtype in rat caudal artery. The caudal artery provides a useful functional assay for pharmacological analysis of NPY and NPY antagonists.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) effects in the epididymis of the guinea-pig: evidence of a pre-junctional PYY-selective receptor

1. The effects of peptide YY (PYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and structurally related peptides upon field stimulation-induced and phenylephrine-mediated contractile responses in the cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig were investigated. 2. Preparations of cauda epididymis responded to field stimulation with contractions which were completely attenuated by both the neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin (500 nM), and also by the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, phentolamine (3 microM). PYY (n=7) and the truncated peptide analogue PYY(3-36) (n=5) inhibited field stimulation-induced contractions (pIC50+s.e.mean: 8.9+/-0.2 and 9.4+/-0.2, respectively). Pancreatic polypeptide (PP, up to 1 microM, n=6), NPY (up to 100 nM, n=6) and the NPY analogues [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (n=6) and NPY(13-36) (both up to 1 microM, n=5) had no significant effect. 3. The NPY Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP3226 ((R)-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-N[(4-hydroxyphenyl)-methyl]-argininami de) at 750 nM (n=6) and 7.5 microM (n=6) did not affect the PYY-mediated inhibition of field stimulation-induced contractions (pIC50 8.9+/-0.3 and 9.0+/-0.3, respectively). In the presence of BIBP3226 (7.5 microM), NPY (n=6) inhibited field stimulation-induced contractions (pIC50 8.0+/-0.2). 4. NPY, PYY and PYY(3-36) inhibited [3H]-noradrenaline release from preparations of epididymis (pIC50 values 7.9+/-0.7, 9.6+/-0.8 and 10.0+/-0.9, respectively, all n=6). The agonists PP and [Leu31,Pro34]PYY (both up to 100 nM) were without significant effect (both n=6). 5. In preparations of cauda epididymis, stimulated with threshold concentrations of the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine (1 microM), both NPY (n=6) and PYY (n=7) elicited concentration-dependent increases in contractile force (with pEC50 values of 8.9+/-0.2 and 8.6+/-0.1, respectively). The effects of both NPY (n=6) and PYY (n=6) were antagonized by preincubation with BIBP3226 (75 nM; apparent pK(B)+/-s.e. values 8.3+/-1.0 and 8.2+/-0.6, respectively). The peptide analogues NPY(13-36) (n=5), PYY(3-36) (n=7) and [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (n=5) did not significantly augment responses to threshold concentrations of phenylephrine. 6. These results are consistent with the proposal that distinct NPY receptors mediate the (prejunctional) inhibition of field stimulation-induced contractions and the (postjunctional) potentiation of responses to phenylephrine in the cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig. The rank order of agonist potency (NPY > or = PYY >> NPY(13-36), [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and PYY(3-36) and the high potency of BIBP3226 indicate that the postjunctional receptor may be Y1-like. The rank orders of agonist potency in inhibiting field stimulation-induced contractile responses and [3H]-noradrenaline release (PYY(3-36) > or = PYY > NPY >> PP, NPY(13-36), [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and PYY(3-36) > or = PYY > NPY >> PP, [Leu31,Pro34]PYY, respectively) are consistent with the action of these peptides at a PYY-preferring receptor subtype, which may be distinct from the presently characterized NPY receptor subtypes.

On the reliability of affinity and efficacy estimates obtained by direct operational model fitting of agonist concentration-effect curves following irreversible receptor inactivation

Recently, Zernig and colleagues (1996) (J Pharmacol Toxicol Meth 35: 223-237) suggested that for the estimation of agonist affinity and efficacy, the method of simultaneously fitting of concentration-effect curves from control and irreversible antagonist-treated tissues to the operational model of agonism is superior to other analytical approaches. In the present study, we have evaluated the limitations of this simultaneous curve fitting method. Simulation studies showed that this method can be only employed with confidence when the upper asymptotes of the control curves display minimal variation between tissues, which makes its practical utility rather limited. The unreliability of the simultaneous fitting procedure was further underscored with the analysis of experimental data obtained from the interaction between noradrenaline and phenoxybenzamine in rat isolated aorta. The lack of robustness of the parameter estimates showed that under standard experimental conditions the outcomes of simultaneous model fitting are highly dependent on between-tissue variations of the upper asymptotes of the control curves and, therefore, may be unreliable. Therefore, whenever possible, a multiple curve design should be adopted, in which control and treated curves are obtained in one tissue and provide enough information for an independent estimation of affinity and efficacy that is free of intertissue differences.

Effects of the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-receptor antagonist BIBP3226 on vascular NPY-receptors with different ligand requirements

The aim was to examine effects of a newly developed neuropeptide Y (NPY)-receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 and to characterize NPY-receptors in the isolated guinea pig caval vein and human subcutaneous artery, respectively. BIBP3226 < or = 1 microM did not affect the basal tension. Pretreatment with increasing concentrations of BIBP3226 (10 nM-1 microM) resulted in a progressive rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to the Y1-receptor selective agonist [Pro34]NPY in the guinea pig caval vein. Regression analysis of the Schild plot gave a pA2-value of 7.58 (7.20-8.33, 95% confidence interval), slope of regression line 0.96 (0.52-1.39, 95% confidence interval) and a correlation coefficient of 0.78. NPY and the C-terminal NPY 2-36 evoked equipotent concentration-dependent contractions, both of which were sensitive to BIBP3226. Although less potent than NPY 2-36, also the contraction induced by NPY 5-36 was antagonized by BIBP3226. In the human subcutaneous artery [Pro34]NPY but not NPY 2-36 (< or = 0.3 microM) evoked a concentration-dependent contraction. Pretreatment with BIBP3226 (0.1 microM) resulted in a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to [Pro34]NPY (from 7.38 +/- 0.10 to 6.95 +/- 0.16 (P < 0.05, n = 6). The present study has shown that the Y1-receptor-selective antagonist BIBP3226 potently antagonizes vascular NPY-receptors with different ligand requirements in the guinea pig caval vein and human subcutaneous artery, respectively. It appears that the guinea pig Y1-receptor is much less stringent in its demand on the N-terminal part of NPY than that of human Y1-receptors.

Neuropeptide Y depresses GABA-mediated calcium transients in developing suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: a novel form of calcium long-term depression

In contrast to its inhibitory role in mature neurons, GABA can exert excitatory actions in developing neurons, including mediation of increases in cytosolic Ca2+. Modulation of this excitatory activity has not been studied previously. We used Ca2+ digital imaging with Fura-2 to test the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) would depress GABA-mediated Ca2+ rises in neurons cultured from the developing suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). SCN neurons were chosen as a model system for this study because SCN neurons are primarily GABAergic, they express high levels of NPY and GABA receptors, and functionally, NPY causes profound phase-shifts in SCN-generated circadian rhythms. Vigorous GABA-mediated Ca2+ activity was found in young SCN neurons that were maintained in vitro for 4-14 d. NPY showed a dose-dependent rapid depression of the amplitude of Ca2+ rises generated by GABA released from presynaptic SCN axons. NPY exerted a long-term depression of cytosolic CA2+ in the majority of neurons tested, which lasted more than 1 hr after NPY washout. The magnitude of the NPY depression was dose-dependent. NPY did not affect Ca2+ levels when GABAA receptor activity was blocked by bicuculline; however, when bicuculline and NPY were withdrawn from the perfusion solution, the subsequent CA2+ rise was either significantly reduced or completely absent, suggesting that the NPY receptor was activated in the absence of elevated intracellular Ca2+ and GABAA receptor activity, and that the latent effect of NPY was revealed only after depolarizing GABA stimulation was renewed. Pretreating neurons with pertussis toxin greatly reduced the ability of NPY to depress GABAergic Ca2+ rises, suggesting that the NPY modulation of the GABA activity was based largely on a mechanism involving pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/Go proteins. NPY receptor stimulation depressed (< 30%) postsynaptic Ca2+ rises evoked by GABA (20 microM) application in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX). The effects of NPY were mimicked by the NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Pro34,Leu31] NPY and the Y2 receptor agonist NPY 13-36 and by peptide YY (PYY). Together, our data suggest that the Y1 and Y2 type NPY receptors act both presynaptically and postsynaptically to depress GABA-mediated Ca2+ rises. If related mechanisms exist in peptide modulation of inhibitory GABA activity in mature neurons, this could underlie long-term changes in the behavior of neurons of the SCN necessary for phase-shifting the circadian clock by NPY, NPY also modulated GABA responses in neuroendocrine neurons from the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. NPY thus can play an important role in evoking long-term depression of GABA-mediated Ca2+ activity in these developing neurons, allowing NPY-secreting cells to modulate the effects of GABA on neurite outgrowth, gene expression, and physiological stimulation. This is the first example of such a cellular memory: that is, long-term Ca2+ depression based on modulation of depolarizing GABA activity.

Neuropeptide Y depresses GABA-mediated calcium transients in developing suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: a novel form of calcium long-term depression

In contrast to its inhibitory role in mature neurons, GABA can exert excitatory actions in developing neurons, including mediation of increases in cytosolic Ca2+. Modulation of this excitatory activity has not been studied previously. We used Ca2+ digital imaging with Fura-2 to test the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) would depress GABA-mediated Ca2+ rises in neurons cultured from the developing suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). SCN neurons were chosen as a model system for this study because SCN neurons are primarily GABAergic, they express high levels of NPY and GABA receptors, and functionally, NPY causes profound phase-shifts in SCN-generated circadian rhythms. Vigorous GABA-mediated Ca2+ activity was found in young SCN neurons that were maintained in vitro for 4-14 d. NPY showed a dose-dependent rapid depression of the amplitude of Ca2+ rises generated by GABA released from presynaptic SCN axons. NPY exerted a long-term depression of cytosolic CA2+ in the majority of neurons tested, which lasted more than 1 hr after NPY washout. The magnitude of the NPY depression was dose-dependent. NPY did not affect Ca2+ levels when GABAA receptor activity was blocked by bicuculline; however, when bicuculline and NPY were withdrawn from the perfusion solution, the subsequent CA2+ rise was either significantly reduced or completely absent, suggesting that the NPY receptor was activated in the absence of elevated intracellular Ca2+ and GABAA receptor activity, and that the latent effect of NPY was revealed only after depolarizing GABA stimulation was renewed. Pretreating neurons with pertussis toxin greatly reduced the ability of NPY to depress GABAergic Ca2+ rises, suggesting that the NPY modulation of the GABA activity was based largely on a mechanism involving pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/Go proteins. NPY receptor stimulation depressed (< 30%) postsynaptic Ca2+ rises evoked by GABA (20 microM) application in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX). The effects of NPY were mimicked by the NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Pro34,Leu31] NPY and the Y2 receptor agonist NPY 13-36 and by peptide YY (PYY). Together, our data suggest that the Y1 and Y2 type NPY receptors act both presynaptically and postsynaptically to depress GABA-mediated Ca2+ rises. If related mechanisms exist in peptide modulation of inhibitory GABA activity in mature neurons, this could underlie long-term changes in the behavior of neurons of the SCN necessary for phase-shifting the circadian clock by NPY, NPY also modulated GABA responses in neuroendocrine neurons from the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. NPY thus can play an important role in evoking long-term depression of GABA-mediated Ca2+ activity in these developing neurons, allowing NPY-secreting cells to modulate the effects of GABA on neurite outgrowth, gene expression, and physiological stimulation. This is the first example of such a cellular memory: that is, long-term Ca2+ depression based on modulation of depolarizing GABA activity.

Benextramine acts as an irreversible noncompetitive antagonist of U46619-mediated contraction of the rat small mesenteric artery

We have studied the effects of benextramine on the U46619 (11 alpha,9 alpha-epoxymethano-15S-hydroxy-prosta-5Z,13E-dienoic acid)-mediated contraction of the rat isolated small mesenteric artery. U46619 (10 nM-10 microM) produced a concentration-dependent contraction of the small mesenteric artery. The selective prostanoid TP receptor antagonist, SQ 30,741 ([1S-[1 alpha,2 alpha(5Z),3 alpha,4 alpha]]-7- [[[[[(oxaheptyl)amino]acetyl]amino]-methyl]-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hep t-2-yl]-5- heptenoic acid; 1 microM), produced a parallel, rightward shift of the U46619 curve with an associated pA2 value of 7.43 +/- 0.09. Treatment of tissues with 100 microM benextramine depressed the maximum response to U46619 in a time-dependent manner. However, neither SQ 30,741 (10 microM) nor U46619 (10 microM) incubation significantly protected against this effect. Thus, benextramine acts as an irreversible noncompetitive antagonist of U46619. The mechanism of this action is not yet clear.

Failure of the putative neuropeptide Y antagonists, benextramine and PYX-2, to inhibit Y2 receptors in rat isolated prostatic vas deferens

1. The pharmacological activity of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and some analogues in inhibiting the twitch contractions induced by electrical stimulation (single pulses at 25 V, 0.15 Hz, 1 ms) in the prostatic portion of the rat isolated vas deferens was investigated. The rank order of agonist potency was: PYY > NPY2-36 > NPY >> NPY13-36 >> NPY18-36 >> [Leu31,Pro34]NPY = hPP, which is consistent with the activation of a Y2 receptor. 2. The putative Y1 and Y2 antagonist, benextramine (BXT), incubated at 100 microM for 10 or 60 min, was ineffective against PYY-induced inhibition of the twitch response, suggesting that the prejunctional Y2 receptor in this tissue is different from the postjunctional one reported in the literature to be sensitive to BXT blockade. 3. The putative NPY antagonist, PYX-2, incubated at 1 microM for 20 min, was completely ineffective in antagonizing PYY-induced inhibition of twitches. 4. The twitch response was totally inhibited by suramin (100 microM) but was little affected by prazosin (1 microM). Furthermore, NPY was without effect on the dose-response curve to ATP in resting conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that in our paradigm, NPY inhibits the release of a purinergic neurotransmitter which mediates contraction of the prostatic portion of the rat vas deferens.