Binding of the radioligand [3H]-SCH 58261, a new non-xanthine A2A adenosine receptor antagonist, to rat striatal membranes

Programmable stopped-flow injection analysis: A comparative study on the effects of adenosine and its aptamer on respiratory burst of salivary and circulatory neutrophils

Neutrophils play a pivotal role in innate immunity by releasing ROS through respiratory bursts to neutralize various pathogenic factors. However, excessive ROS release can cause tissue damage. Adenosine is an endogenous anti-inflammatory molecule inhibiting respiratory burst to protect the host. Adenosine aptamers with antibody-like properties and good stability are expected to act as adenosine antagonists with functional modulation capability. This study compares the effects of adenosine and its aptamer on the respiratory bursts of salivary polymorphonuclear leukocytes and circulating polymorphonuclear leukocytes using a programmable stopped-flow injection approach, ensuring rapid and efficient analysis while maintaining the neutrophils' viability. The results show that primed salivary polymorphonuclear leukocytes exhibit specificities that differ from circulating polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Adenosine aptamer can function as an inhibitory antagonist that distinguishes between physiologically controlled and excessive priming of neutrophils, showing potential application prospects in immunotherapy.

Targets of Immune Escape Mechanisms in Cancer: Basis for Development and Evolution of Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has emerged as a novel therapeutic tool for cancer therapy in the last decade. Unfortunately, a small number of patients benefit from approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, multiple studies are being conducted to find new ICIs and combination strategies to improve the current ICIs. In this review, we discuss some approved immune checkpoints, such as PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4, and also highlight newer emerging ICIs. For instance, HLA-E, overexpressed by tumor cells, represents an immune-suppressive feature by binding CD94/NKG2A, on NK and T cells. NKG2A blockade recruits CD8+ T cells and activates NK cells to decrease the tumor burden. NKG2D acts as an NK cell activating receptor that can also be a potential ICI. The adenosine A2A and A2B receptors, CD47-SIRPα, TIM-3, LAG-3, TIGIT, and VISTA are targets that also contribute to cancer immunoresistance and have been considered for clinical trials. Their antitumor immunosuppressive functions can be used to develop blocking antibodies. PARPs, mARTs, and B7-H3 are also other potential targets for immunosuppression. Additionally, miRNA, mRNA, and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated immunotherapeutic approaches are being investigated with great interest. Pre-clinical and clinical studies project these targets as potential immunotherapeutic candidates in different cancer types for their robust antitumor modulation.

Adenosine-A2A Receptor Pathway in Cancer Immunotherapy

A2A receptors (A2AR), a typical GPCR with a high affinity for adenosine, was expressed in many immune cells, such as regulatory T cells, cytotoxic T cells, macrophages, etc. Adenosine binding to the A2AR receptor activates the typical G protein and triggers the cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway. The adenosine-A2AR pathway plays an important role in protecting normal organs and tissues from the autoimmune response of immune cells. However, many solid tumors hijack the adenosine-A2AR pathway by promoting adenosine accumulation. The activation of the A2AR pathway inhibited the immune response of immune cells and then promotes the immune escape of tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Recently, both animal experiments and clinical trials indicated that blocking the adenosine pathway can inhibit the progression of a variety of solid tumors. In addition, it is encouraging that A2AR blockade combined with CAR T cells therapy showed better anti-tumor efficacy. Therefore, this review will discuss the role of the adenosine-A2AR pathway in the tumor microenvironment and summarize recent advances of A2AR-cancer related studies.

Expression of a short antibody heavy chain peptide effectively antagonizes adenosine 2A receptor in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND

Adenosine 2A receptor (A_2AR) is involved in many physiological and pathological functions and serves as an important drug target. Inhibition of A_2AR may alleviate symptoms associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the currently used A_2AR antagonists have specificity limitations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A Fab fragment (Fab2838) of an A_2AR mouse monoclonal antibody can specifically bind to A_2AR to form a complex and inhibit the activity of its receptor. We constructed the vector AntiA_2AR, a small-molecule peptide that binds to and inhibits A_2AR based on Fab2838.

RESULTS

Experiments in HEK293T cells showed that peptide AntiA_2AR of 29 peptides was the most effective among the synthesized peptides in inhibiting the A_2AR downstream signal cAMP/PKA/CREB. In neurons, the AntiA_2AR reversed the calcium flow change induced by the A_2AR agonist CGS21680 (1 μM). Furthermore, AntiA_2AR expression in the mice striatum weakened the p-PKA/p-CREB signal, enhanced locomotor abilities and increased time spent in the center area in the home-cage observation experiment and increased anxiolytic behavior in the elevated-plus maze test.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonistic peptide AntiA_2AR can effectively block the A_2AR signaling pathway. This provides a new strategy for the specific inhibition of A_2AR and provides information needed for drug development.

Effects of intra-accumbal or intra-prefrontal cortex microinjections of adenosine 2A receptor ligands on responses to cocaine reward and seeking in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Many studies indicated that adenosine via its A_2A receptors influences the behavioral effects of cocaine by modulating dopamine neurotransmission. The hypothesis was tested that A_2A receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) or the prefrontral cortex (PFc) may modulate cocaine reward and/or cocaine seeking behavior in rats.

METHODS

The effects of local bilateral microinjections of the selective A_2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 or the A_2A receptor antagonists KW 6002 and SCH 58261 were investigated on cocaine self-administration on reinstatement of cocaine seeking.

RESULTS

The intra-NAc shell, but not intra-infralimbic PFc, administration of CGS 21680 significantly reduced the number of active lever presses and the number of cocaine (0.25 mg/kg) infusions. However, tonic activation of A_2A receptors located in the NAc or PFc did not play a role in modulating the rewarding actions of cocaine since neither KW 6002 nor SCH 58261 microinjections altered the cocaine (0.5 mg/kg) infusions. The intra-NAc but not intra-PFc microinjections of CGS 21680 dose- dependently attenuated the reinstatement of active lever presses induced by cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and the drug-associated combined conditioned stimuli using the subthreshold dose of cocaine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.). On the other hand, the intra-NAc pretreatment with SCH 58261, but not with KW 6002, given alone evoked reinstatement of cocaine seeking behavior.

CONCLUSION

The results strongly support the involvement of accumbal shell A_2A receptors as a target, the activation of which exerts an inhibitory control over cocaine reward and cocaine seeking.

BDNF-induced presynaptic facilitation of GABAergic transmission in the hippocampus of young adults is dependent of TrkB and adenosine A2A receptors

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adenosine are widely recognized as neuromodulators of glutamatergic transmission in the adult brain. Most BDNF actions upon excitatory plasticity phenomena are under control of adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs). Concerning gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated transmission, the available information refers to the control of GABA transporters. We now focused on the influence of BDNF and the interplay with adenosine on phasic GABAergic transmission. To assess this, we evaluated evoked and spontaneous synaptic currents recorded from CA1 pyramidal cells in acute hippocampal slices from adult rat brains (6 to 10 weeks old). BDNF (10-100 ng/mL) increased miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current (mIPSC) frequency, but not amplitude, as well as increased the amplitude of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) evoked by afferent stimulation. The facilitatory action of BDNF upon GABAergic transmission was lost in the presence of a Trk inhibitor (K252a, 200 nM), but not upon p75(NTR) blockade (anti-p75(NTR) IgG, 50 μg/mL). Moreover, the facilitatory action of BDNF onto GABAergic transmission was also prevented upon A2AR antagonism (SCH 58261, 50 nM). We conclude that BDNF facilitates GABAergic signaling at the adult hippocampus via a presynaptic mechanism that depends on TrkB and adenosine A2AR activation.

Biosensor-based affinities and binding kinetics of small molecule antagonists to the adenosine A(2A) receptor reconstituted in HDL like particles

The options for investigating solubilised G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by biophysical techniques have long been hampered by their instability. A thermostabilised adenosine A2A receptor expressed in insect cells, purified in detergent and reconstituted into high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles was immobilised onto a Surface Plasmon Resonance sensor chip. This allowed measurement of affinities and kinetics for A2A antagonists with affinities ranging from 50 pM to almost 2 μM. Compared with other formats, reproduction of affinities, and dissociation and association rate constants are good, reasonable and poor respectively, indicating stabilised receptors in HDL particles are useful for investigating specific aspects of GPCR-ligand interactions.

History and perspectives of A2A adenosine receptor antagonists as potential therapeutic agents

Growing evidence emphasizes that the purine nucleoside adenosine plays an active role as a local regulator in different pathologies. Adenosine is a ubiquitous nucleoside involved in various physiological and pathological functions by stimulating A1 , A2A , A2B , and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). At the present time, the role of A2A ARs is well known in physiological conditions and in a variety of pathologies, including inflammatory tissue damage and neurodegenerative disorders. In particular, the use of selective A2A antagonists has been reported to be potentially useful in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). In this review, A2A AR signal transduction pathways, together with an analysis of the structure-activity relationships of A2A antagonists, and their corresponding pharmacological roles and therapeutic potential have been presented. The initial results from an emerging polypharmacological approach are also analyzed. This approach is based on the optimization of the affinity and/or functional activity of the examined compounds toward multiple targets, such as A1 /A2A ARs and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B), both closely implicated in the pathogenesis of PD.

Functional efficacy of adenosine A₂A receptor agonists is positively correlated to their receptor residence time

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The adenosine A(2A) receptor belongs to the superfamily of GPCRs and is a promising therapeutic target. Traditionally, the discovery of novel agents for the A(2A) receptor has been guided by their affinity for the receptor. This parameter is determined under equilibrium conditions, largely ignoring the kinetic aspects of the ligand-receptor interaction. The aim of this study was to assess the binding kinetics of A(2A) receptor agonists and explore a possible relationship with their functional efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH We set up, validated and optimized a kinetic radioligand binding assay (a so-called competition association assay) at the A(2A) receptor from which the binding kinetics of unlabelled ligands were determined. Subsequently, functional efficacies of A(2A) receptor agonists were determined in two different assays: a novel label-free impedance-based assay and a more traditional cAMP determination. KEY RESULTS A simplified competition association assay yielded an accurate determination of the association and dissociation rates of unlabelled A(2A) receptor ligands at their receptor. A correlation was observed between the receptor residence time of A(2A) receptor agonists and their intrinsic efficacies in both functional assays. The affinity of A(2A) receptor agonists was not correlated to their functional efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This study indicates that the molecular basis of different agonist efficacies at the A(2A) receptor lies within their different residence times at this receptor.

Adenosine A₂A and A₂B receptors are both required for adenosine A₁ receptor-mediated cardioprotection

All four adenosine receptor subtypes have been shown to play a role in cardioprotection, and there is evidence that all four subtypes may be expressed in cardiomyocytes. There is also increasing evidence that optimal adenosine cardioprotection requires the activation of more than one receptor subtype. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adenosine A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors modulate adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection. Isolated perfused hearts of wild-type (WT), A(2A) knockout (KO), and A(2B)KO mice, perfused at constant pressure and constant heart rate, underwent 30 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 200 nM) was administrated 10 min before ischemia and for the first 10 min of reperfusion. Treatment with CHA significantly improved postischemic left ventricular developed pressure (74 ± 4% vs. 44 ± 4% of preischemic left ventricular developed pressure at 60 min of reperfusion) and reduced infarct size (30 ± 2% with CHA vs. 52 ± 5% in control) in WT hearts, effects that were blocked by the A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (100 nM). Treatments with the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 (200 nM) and the A(2B) agonist BAY 60-6583 (200 nM) did not exert any beneficial effects. Deletion of adenosine A(2A) or A(2B) receptor subtypes did not alter ischemia-reperfusion injury, but CHA failed to exert a cardioprotective effect in hearts of mice from either KO group. These findings indicate that both adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors are required for adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection, implicating a role for interactions among receptor subtypes.

Selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists and antagonists protect against spinal cord injury through peripheral and central effects

BACKGROUND

Permanent functional deficits following spinal cord injury (SCI) arise both from mechanical injury and from secondary tissue reactions involving inflammation. Enhanced release of adenosine and glutamate soon after SCI represents a component in the sequelae that may be responsible for resulting functional deficits. The role of adenosine A2A receptor in central ischemia/trauma is still to be elucidated. In our previous studies we have demonstrated that the adenosine A2A receptor-selective agonist CGS21680, systemically administered after SCI, protects from tissue damage, locomotor dysfunction and different inflammatory readouts. In this work we studied the effect of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH58261, systemically administered after SCI, on the same parameters. We investigated the hypothesis that the main action mechanism of agonists and antagonists is at peripheral or central sites.

METHODS

Spinal trauma was induced by extradural compression of SC exposed via a four-level T5-T8 laminectomy in mouse. Three drug-dosing protocols were utilized: a short-term systemic administration by intraperitoneal injection, a chronic administration via osmotic minipump, and direct injection into the spinal cord.

RESULTS

SCH58261, systemically administered (0.01 mg/kg intraperitoneal. 1, 6 and 10 hours after SCI), reduced demyelination and levels of TNF-α, Fas-L, PAR, Bax expression and activation of JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) 24 hours after SCI. Chronic SCH58261 administration, by mini-osmotic pump delivery for 10 days, improved the neurological deficit up to 10 days after SCI. Adenosine A2A receptors are physiologically expressed in the spinal cord by astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes. Soon after SCI (24 hours), these receptors showed enhanced expression in neurons. Both the A2A agonist and antagonist, administered intraperitoneally, reduced expression of the A2A receptor, ruling out the possibility that the neuroprotective effects of the A2A agonist are due to A2A receptor desensitization. When the A2A antagonist and agonist were centrally injected into injured SC, only SCH58261 appeared neuroprotective, while CGS21680 was ineffective.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the A2A antagonist protects against SCI by acting on centrally located A2A receptors. It is likely that blockade of A2A receptors reduces excitotoxicity. In contrast, neuroprotection afforded by the A2A agonist may be primarily due to peripheral effects.

Adenosine inhibits paraventricular pre-sympathetic neurons through ATP-dependent potassium channels

Adenosine produces cardiovascular depressor effects in various brain regions. However, the cellular mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. The pre-sympathetic neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) play an important role in regulating arterial blood pressure and sympathetic outflow through projections to the spinal cord and brainstem. In this study, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings on retrogradely labeled PVN neurons projecting to the intermediolateral cell column of the spinal cord in rats. Adenosine (10-100 microM) decreased the firing activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with a marked hyperpolarization in 12 of 26 neurons tested. Blockade of A(1) receptors with the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine or intracellular dialysis of guanosine 5'-O-(2-thodiphosphate) eliminated the inhibitory effect of adenosine on labeled PVN neurons. Immunocytochemical labeling revealed that A(1) receptors were expressed on spinally projecting PVN neurons. Also, blocking ATP-dependent K(+) (K(ATP)) channels with 100 microM glibenclamide or 200 microM tolbutamide, but not the G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) channels blocker tertiapin-Q, abolished the inhibitory effect of adenosine on the firing activity of PVN neurons. Furthermore, glibenclamide or tolbutamide significantly decreased the adenosine-induced outward currents in labeled neurons. The reversal potential of adenosine-induced currents was close to the K(+) equilibrium potential. In addition, adenosine decreased the frequency of both spontaneous and miniature glutamatergic excitatory post-synaptic currents and GABAergic inhibitory post-synaptic currents in labeled neurons, and these effects were also blocked by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. Collectively, our findings suggest that adenosine inhibits the excitability of PVN pre-sympathetic neurons through A(1) receptor-mediated opening of K(ATP) channels.

The adenosine A2A receptor antagonist ZM241385 enhances neuronal survival after oxygen-glucose deprivation in rat CA1 hippocampal slices

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Activation of adenosine A(2A) receptors in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices during oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD), a model of cerebral ischaemia, was investigated.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We made extracellular recordings of CA1 field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fepsps) followed by histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques coupled to Western blots.

KEY RESULTS

OGD (7 or 30 min duration) elicited an irreversible loss of fepsps invariably followed by the appearance of anoxic depolarization (AD), an unambiguous sign of neuronal damage. The application of the selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, ZM241385 (4-(2-[7-amino-2-{2-furyl}{1,2,4}triazolo{2,3-a}{1,3,5}triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol; 100-500 nmolxL(-1)) prevented or delayed AD appearance induced by 7 or 30 min OGD and protected from the irreversible fepsp depression elicited by 7 min OGD. Two different selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists, SCH58261 and SCH442416, were less effective than ZM241385 during 7 min OGD. The extent of CA1 cell injury was assessed 3 h after the end of 7 min OGD by propidium iodide. Substantial CA1 pyramidal neuronal damage occurred in untreated slices, exposed to OGD, whereas injury was significantly prevented by 100 nmolxL(-1) ZM241385. Glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) immunostaining showed that 3 h after 7 min OGD, astrogliosis was appreciable. Western blot analysis indicated an increase in GFAP 30 kDa fragment which was significantly reduced by treatment with 100 nmolxL(-1) ZM241385.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In the CA1 hippocampus, antagonism of A(2A) adenosine receptors by ZM241385 was protective during OGD (a model of cerebral ischaemia) by delaying AD appearance, decreasing astrocyte activation and improving neuronal survival.

Autoradiographic comparison of in vitro binding characteristics of various tritiated adenosine A2A receptor ligands in rat, mouse and pig brain and first ex vivo results

The adenosine A(2A) receptor in the basal ganglia is involved in the control of movement and plays a role in movement disorders such as Parkinsonism. Developing ligands to evaluate that receptor by noninvasive methods such as positron emission tomography has a high priority. In vitro radioligand binding guides the selection of ligands for in vivo application. This study measured the binding of the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist [(3)H]MSX-2 (3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-m-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthine) to rat, mouse and pig brain by autoradiography. Other studies measured binding to membranes from PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. Those binding parameters were compared to those of the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist [(3)H]ZM241385 (4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino)ethyl)phenol), the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist [(3)H]CGS21680 (2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) and the unselective adenosine receptor agonist [(3)H]NECA (5'N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine). The potency order (K(d)) in the three species was [(3)H]ZM241385<[(3)H]MSX-2<[(3)H]NECA<[(3)H]CGS21680. The density of [(3)H]MSX-2 binding sites was greater in the striatum than in the cortex. Preliminary ex vivo experiments showed that by 10min after iv injection, [(3)H]MSX-2 and [(3)H]CGS21680 crossed the blood-brain barrier to the extent of almost 1% ID/g brain tissue, but [(3)H]NECA and [(3)H]ZM241385 to only 0.2% ID/g. The prior administration of unlabeled ZM241385 significantly lowered brain uptake of [(3)H]MSX-2. In conclusion, [(3)H]MSX-2 has a high affinity and sufficient selectivity for the adenosine A(2A) receptor. It penetrates the blood-brain barrier. Sensitivity to photoisomerization is a limitation. Further investigations assess its suitability as a ligand for imaging the brain adenosine A(2A) receptor.

Adenosine receptor ligands and PET imaging of the CNS

Advances in radiotracer chemistry have resulted in the development of novel molecular imaging probes for adenosine receptors (ARs). With the availability of these molecules, the function of ARs in human pathophysiology as well as the safety and efficacy of approaches to the different AR targets can now be determined. Molecular imaging is a rapidly growing field of research that allows the identification of molecular targets and functional processes in vivo. It is therefore gaining increasing interest as a tool in drug development because it permits the process of evaluating promising therapeutic targets to be stratified. Further, molecular imaging has the potential to evolve into a useful diagnostic tool, particularly for neurological and psychiatric disorders. This chapter focuses on currently available AR ligands that are suitable for molecular neuroimaging and describes first applications in healthy subjects and patients using positron emission tomography (PET).

Recent developments in adenosine A2A receptor ligands

The development of potent and selective agonists and antagonists of adenosine receptors (ARs) has been a target of medicinal chemistry research for several decades, and recently the US Food and Drug Administration has approved Lexiscan, an adenosine derivative substituted at the 2 position, for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Currently, some other adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)AR) agonists and antagonists are undergoing preclinical testing and clinical trials. While agonists are potent antiinflammatory agents also showing hypotensive effects, antagonists are being developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.However, since there are still major problems in this field, including side effects, low brain penetration (for the targeting of CNS diseases), short half-life, or lack of in vivo effects, the design and development of new AR ligands is a hot research topic.This review presents an update on the medicinal chemistry of A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, and stresses the strong need for more selective ligands at the human A(2A)AR subtype, in particular in the case of agonists.

Adenosine A(2A) receptors, dopamine D(2) receptors and their interactions in Parkinson's disease

Future therapies in Parkinson's disease may substantially build on the existence of intra-membrane receptor-receptor interactions in DA receptor containing heteromeric receptor complexes. The A(2A)/D(2) heteromer is of substantial interest in view of its specific location in cortico-striatal glutamate terminals and in striato-pallidal GABA neurons. Antagonistic A(2A)/D(2) receptor interactions in this heteromer demonstrated at the cellular level, and at the level of the striato-pallidal GABA neuron and at the network level made it possible to suggest A(2A) antagonists as anti-parkinsonian drugs. The major mechanism is an enhancement of D(2) signaling leading to attenuation of hypokinesia, tremor, and rigidity in models of Parkinson's disease with inspiring results in two clinical trials. Other interactions are antagonism at the level of the adenylyl cyclase; heterologous sensitization at the A(2A) activated adenylyl cyclase by persistent D(2) activation and a compensatory up-regulation of A(2A) receptors in response to intermittent Levodopa treatment. An increased dominance of A(2A) homomers over D(2) homomers and A(2A)/D(2) heteromers after intermittent Levodopa treatment may therefore contribute to development of Levodopa induced dyskinesias and to the wearing off of the therapeutic actions of Levodopa giving additional therapeutic roles of A(2A) antagonists. Their neuroprotective actions may involve an increase in the retrograde trophic signaling in the nigro-striatal DA system.

Functional coupling of the Galpha(olf) variant XLGalpha(olf) with the human adenosine A2A receptor

A recently identified novel Galphaolf variant, XLGalphaolf, is shown to functionally couple to the human adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR). In Sf9 cells expressing A2AR, beta1, and gamma2, co-expression of XLGalphaolf increased NECA-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding from approximately 130% to 300% of basal levels. Pharmacological characteristics of A2AR ligands on these cells were evaluated by using [3H]ZM241385- and [35S]GTPgammaS- binding assays. The rank order of the equilibrium binding constants (Kd or Ki) of adenosine receptor ligands were [3H]ZM241385 approximately CGS15943 < MRS1220 < < CV1808 approximately NECA < CGS21680 approximately adenosine < IBMECA < HEMADO approximately CPA approximately CCPA. The rank order of EC50 values for agonists were CV1808 approximately NECA < adenosine approximately CGS26180 < IBMECA < HEMADO approximately CPA approximately CCPA. This pharmacology is consistent with the literature for A2AR and suggests that Sf9 cells co-expressing A2AR, beta1, gamma2, and XLGalphaolf could serve as a heterologous expression system for A2AR drug screening.

6-(2-Furanyl)-9H-purin-2-amine derivatives as A2A adenosine antagonists

Structure-activity relationships have been investigated through substitutions at the 9-position of the 2-amino-6-(2-furanyl) purine (5) to identify novel and selective A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonists. Several potent and selective antagonists were identified. In particular, compounds 20, 25, and 26 show very high affinity with excellent selectivity.

Synthesis of alkyne derivatives of a novel triazolopyrazine as A2A adenosine receptor antagonists

A novel [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyrazine core was synthesized and coupled with terminal acetylenes. The structure-activity relationship of the alkynes from this novel template was studied for their in vitro and in vivo adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism. Selected compounds from this series were shown to have potent in vitro and in vivo activities against adenosine A(2A) receptor. Compound 12, in particular, was found to be orally active at 3mg/kg in both a mouse catalepsy model and a 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model.

Binding of the prototypical adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 to the cerebral cortex of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice

1. 2-p-(2-carboxyethylphenethylamino-5'-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) (CGS 21680) is considered the reference compound to study adenosine A(2A) receptors. However, CGS 21680 binding in the cerebral cortex, where adenosine A(1) receptors are predominant, displays a mixed A(2A)/A(1) receptor pharmacology. We now use adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor knockout mice to investigate the characteristics of cortical [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding. 2. [(3)H]CGS 21680 binding to the cerebral cortex was strongly reduced in adenosine A(1) receptor knockout mice, but only slightly reduced in A(2A) receptor knockout mice compared with the corresponding wild-type littermates. 3. Another selective A(2A) receptor ligand, [(3)H]-5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine ([(3)H]SCH 58261), displayed a saturable binding to mouse cortical membranes, albeit with a binding density 20 times lower than that of striatal membranes, and this [(3)H]SCH58261 binding was abolished in both striatal and cortical membranes of A(2A) receptor knockout mice and unchanged in A(1) receptor knockout mice. 4. The presence of A(2A) receptors in cortical neurons was further confirmed by Western blot in mouse cortical nerve terminal membranes. 5. It is concluded that, although A(2A) receptors are present in the cerebral cortex, the purportedly selective A(2A) receptor agonist [(3)H]CGS 21680 binds in the cerebral cortex to an entity that requires the presence of adenosine A(1) receptors. Thus, CGS 21680 should be used with care in all preparations where adenosine A(1) receptors out-number A(2A) receptors.

Interactive role of adenosine and dopamine in the opiate withdrawal syndrome

Adenosine reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms by activating A(1) adenosine receptors, probably by inhibiting excitatory amino acid release. Since blockade of A(2A) adenosine receptors seems to enhance dopaminergic striatopallidal transmission, we evaluated the role of the purinergic system in the opiate withdrawal syndrome by using two A(1) receptor agonists [ N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine, CHA and 2-chloro- N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine, CCPA], and two A(2A) receptor antagonists (SCH 58261 and 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine, CSC). Male adult rats received increasing doses of morphine sulphate suspended in 5 ml/kg of a sustained release preparation (40-100 mg/kg s.c.) daily for 4 days and 20 h after the last administration, the withdrawal syndrome was evoked by naloxone (5 mg/kg i.p.). Animals were observed for 30 min for signs of opiate withdrawal. Other groups of rats were implanted with concentric probes for microdialysis and dopamine levels were measured in the nucleus accumbens. CHA and CCPA (0.05, 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) significantly reduced "wet-dog" shakes, diarrhoea, teeth chattering, jumping and writhing. SCH 58261 and CSC (0.1, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg i.p.), given 10 min before naloxone, also reduced signs of opiate withdrawal. CHA plus SCH 58261 and CCPA plus CSC greatly enhanced the reduction of withdrawal signs observed with CHA and CCPA or CSC and SCH 58261 alone. In vivo microdialysis showed that naloxone significantly decreased DA release; this effect was prevented by pretreatment with systemic SCH 58261 and CSC, but not with CHA and CCPA. Our results demonstrate that A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors mediate the effect induced by adenosine in opiate withdrawal syndrome and suggest that adenosine A(1) agonists and adenosine A(2A) antagonists may be beneficial in the treatment of this syndrome.

Recent developments in the field of A2A and A3 adenosine receptor antagonists

In the last years adenosine receptors have been extensively studied, and mainly at present we understand the importance of A(2A) and A(3) adenosine receptors. A(2A) selective adenosine receptors antagonists are promising new drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, while A(3) selective adenosine receptors antagonists have been postulated as novel anti-inflammatory and antiallergic agents; recent studies also indicated a possible employment of these derivatives as antitumour agents. Lately different classes of compounds have been identified as potent A(2A) and A(3) antagonists. In this article we report the past and present efforts which led to development of more potent and selective A(2A) and A(3) antagonists. Our group has mainly worked on the pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine nucleus both as A(2A) and A(3) antagonists, aiming to improve the affinity, selectivity and the hydrophilic profile. In fact, we have synthesised several compounds endowed with high affinity and selectivity versus A(2A) adenosine receptors, as 2, 2a-c (K(i)A(2A)=0.12-0.19 nM), or A(3) adenosine receptors, as 4p (K(i)A(3)=0.01 nM) and 4q (K(i)A(3)=0.04 nM).

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of C9- and C2-substituted pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines as new A2A and A3 adenosine receptors antagonists

In the past few years, our group has been involved in the development of A(2A) and A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists which led to the synthesis of SCH58261 (5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine, 61), potent and very selective at the A(2A) receptor subtype, and N(8)-substituted-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines-N(5)-urea or amide (MRE series, b), very selective at the human A(3) adenosine receptor subtype. We now describe a large series of C(9)- and C(2)-substituted pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines to represent an extension of structure-activity relationship work on this class of tricyclic compounds. The introduction of a substituent at 9 position of the tricyclic antagonistic structure led to retention of receptor affinity but a loss of selectivity in respect to the lead compounds b, N(8)-substituted-pirazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines-N(5)-urea or -amide. The substitution of the furanyl moiety of compound 61, necessary for receptor binding, with a phenyl or a substituted aromatic ring (compounds 5a-d, 6-8), caused a complete loss of the affinity at all the adenosine receptor subtypes, demonstrating that the furanyl ring is a necessary structural element to guarantee interaction with the adenosine receptor surface. The introduction of an ethoxy group at the ortho position of the aromatic ring to mimic the oxygen of the furan (compound 5c, 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-ethoxyphenyl)pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine) did not enhance affinity. The introduction of the cycloaminomethyl function by Mannich reaction at the 5' position of the furanyl ring of 61 and the C(9)-substituted compound 41 (5-amino-8-methyl-9-methylsulfanyl-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine) resulted in complete water solubility but a loss of receptor affinity. We can conclude that modifications or substitutions at the furanyl ring are not allowed and the introduction of a substituent at the 9-position of the core pyrazolo-triazolo-pyrimidine structure caused a severe loss of selectivity, probably due to an increased steric hindrance of the radical introduced.

Synthesis, biological activity, and molecular modeling investigation of new pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine derivatives as human A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists

A new series of pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines bearing different substitutions on the phenylcarbamoyl moieties at the N5 position, being highly potent and selective human A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists, is described. The compounds represent an extension and an improvement of our previous work on this class of compounds (J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4473-4478; J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4768-4780). All the synthesized compounds showed A(3) adenosine receptor affinity in the subnanomolar range and high levels of selectivity in radioligand binding assays at the human A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors. In particular, the effect of the substitution and its position on the phenyl ring have been studied. From binding data, it is evident that the unsubstituted derivatives on the phenyl ring (e.g., compound 59, hA(3) = 0.16 nM, hA(1)/hA(3) = 3713, hA(2A)/hA(3) = 2381, hA(2B)/hA(3) = 1388) showed the best profile in terms of affinity and selectivity at the human A(3) adenosine receptors. The introduction of a sulfonic acid moiety at the para position on the phenyl ring was attempted in order to design water soluble derivatives. However, this substitution led to a dramatic decrease of affinity at all four adenosine receptor subtypes. A computer-generated model of the human A(3) receptor was built and analyzed to better interpret these results, demonstrating that steric control, in particular at the para position on the phenyl ring, plays a fundamental role in the receptor interaction. Some of the synthesized compounds proved to be full antagonists in a specific functional model, where the inhibition of cAMP-generation by IB-MECA was measured in membranes of CHO cells stably transfected with the human A(3) receptor with IC(50) values in the nanomolar range, with a statistically significative linear relationship with the binding data.

7-Substituted 5-amino-2-(2-furyl)pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines as A2A adenosine receptor antagonists: a study on the importance of modifications at the side chain on the activity and solubility

It was demonstrated in the early 1990s that adenosine exerts many physiological functions through the interaction with four different receptors, named A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. In the past few years, our group has been involved in the development of A2A antagonists, which led to the synthesis of SCH 58261 (1), the first potent and selective adenosine A2A antagonist, which has been widely used as a reference compound. In this paper, we present an extended series of pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines synthesized with the aim to investigate the influence of the substitutions on the pyrazole ring. The choice of the substituents was based on their capability to improve water solubility while retaining high affinity and selectivity at the human A2A adenosine receptor subtype. In this series, some structural characteristics that are important for activity, i.e., tricyclic structure, free amino group at 5-position, furan ring, and substituent at 7-position on the pyrazole moiety, have been maintained. We focused our attention on the nature of the phenyl ring substituent to improve water solubility. Following this strategy, we developed new compounds with good affinity and selectivity for A2A adenosine receptors, such as 8d (K(i) 0.12 nM; hA1/hA2A ratio = 1025; R(m) = 2.8), 8h (K(i) 0.22; hA1/hA2A ratio = 9818; R(m) = 3.4), 8i (K(i) 0.18 nM; hA1/hA2A ratio = 994; R(m) = 2.8), 8k (K(i) 0.13 nM; hA1/hA2A ratio = 4430; R(m) = 3.6), and 14b (K(i) 0.19 nM; hA1/hA2A ratio = 2273; R(m) = 2.7). All the new synthesized compounds have no significant interaction with either A2B or A3 receptor subtypes. This new series of compounds deeply enlightens some structural requirements to display high affinity and selectivity for the A2A adenosine receptor subtype, although our goal of identifying new compounds with increased water solubility was not completely achieved. On this basis, other strategies will be devised to improve this class of compounds with a profile that appears to be promising for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson's disease.

Evaluation of [4-O-methyl-(11)C]KW-6002 as a potential PET ligand for mapping central adenosine A(2A) receptors in rats

KW-6002, a xanthine-based adenosine A(2A) antagonist, was labelled with the positron emitter carbon-11 by O-methylation of its precursor, KF23325, using [(11)C]iodomethane and was evaluated in rats as a putative in vivo radioligand for positron emission tomography (PET). Following intravenous injection of [(11)C]KW-6002, radioactivity was measured in blood, plasma, peripheral tissues, and in discrete brain tissues over a 2-h time period commensurate with PET scanning. In brain, [(11)C]KW-6002 showed highest retention in striata, with evidence of saturable binding, and lowest retention in frontal cortex (a tissue low in adenosine A(2A) receptors). PET scanning with [(11)C]KW-6002 demonstrated a specific signal in the striata which could be described using compartmental modelling. Specific binding was, however, also detected in extrastriatal regions, including brain areas reported to have low adenosine A(2A) receptor density. Blocking studies with the A(1) selective antagonist KF15372 and the non xanthine-type A(2A) antagonist ZM 241385 failed to elucidate the nature of this binding. Thus, although [(11)C]KW-6002 shows some potential for development as a PET ligand for quantifying striatal adenosine A(2A) receptor function, its in vivo selectivity requires further investigation.

In vivo labelling of the adenosine A2A receptor in mouse brain using the selective antagonist [3H]SCH 58261

The selective A2A receptor antagonist [3H]SCH 58261 was injected intravenously in mice and the radioactivity accumulating in various brain regions was determined by tissue sampling. Radioactivity levels in regions of interest such as the striatum were highest 15 min after injection and quickly declined thereafter (30 min and 1 h postinjection) in a time-dependent manner. The amount of labelling was ranked as follows: striatum (4.6 +/- 0.3 fmol/mg protein) >> cortex > hippocampus > pons = hypothalamus > cerebellum (0.5 +/- 0.05 fmol/mg protein). Specific labelling of the A2A receptor occurred in striatum and cortex because significantly less radioactivity accumulated in these areas from adenosine A2A receptor knockout mice as compared to wild-type littermates. In control outbred CD1 mice, a striatum-to-cerebellum ratio of 7.6 +/- 0.6 was found. At 30 min postinjection, the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine reduced the radioactivity due to [3H]SCH 58261 in the striatum by 32% at 1 mg/kg i.p. and by 66% at the stimulant dose of 6.25 mg/kg i.p. Radioactivity in the striatum was lowered, respectively, by 66 and 86% 30 min after injection of 3 or 10 mg/kg i.p. doses of unlabelled SCH 58261. The present results indicate that [3H]SCH 58261 directly labels striatal A2A receptors in vivo. Thus [3H]SCH 58261 is an excellent tool for studying brain distribution and A2A receptor occupancy of various compounds ranging from xanthines, such as caffeine, to other A2A antagonists.

[(3)H]ZM241385--an antagonist radioligand for adenosine A(2A) receptors in rat brain

Binding of the novel adenosine A(2A) receptor-selective antagonist radioligand [2-(3)H]-4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)(1,2,4)triazolo(2,3-a)(1,3,5,)triazin-5-yl amino]ethyl)phenol ([(3)H]ZM241385) was examined using particulate preparations and frozen sections of rat brain. In membranes from the rat striatum, binding was saturable, reversible and temperature-dependent. Analysis of saturation isotherms indicated that [(3)H]ZM241385 bound with high affinity (K(d) of 0.84 nM), high density (1680 fmol mg protein(-1)) and with a high proportion of specific binding (93% at 1 nM radioligand). Examination of competition profiles indicated that [(3)H]ZM241385 bound to sites with an A(2A) adenosine receptor-like rank order. The presence of guanosine 5'-(3-thio)-triphosphate failed to alter either [(3)H]ZM241385 binding or agonist competition for [(3)H]ZM241385 binding. Autoradiographic analysis of [(3)H]ZM241385 binding to frozen sections of rat brain indicated specific binding to the rat striatum of similar affinity (K(d) of 0.43 nM) and susceptibility to adenosine receptor ligands. At 2 nM [(3)H]ZM241385, specific binding comprised 95+/-1% total binding. In the hippocampus and frontal cortex, binding of [(3)H]ZM241385 failed to saturate and was of lower density. Taken together, these results indicate that [(3)H]ZM241385 should prove to be a useful radioligand in the characterisation of adenosine A(2A) receptors.

Pyrazolo[4,3-e]1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine derivatives as highly potent and selective human A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists: influence of the chain at the N(8) pyrazole nitrogen

An enlarged series of pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines previously reported, in preliminary form (Baraldi et al. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4473-4478), as highly potent and selective human A(3) adenosine receptor antagonists is described. The synthesized compounds showed A(3) adenosine receptor affinity in the sub-nanomolar range and high levels of selectivity evaluated in radioligand binding assays at human A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) adenosine receptors. In particular, the effect of the chain at the N(8) pyrazole nitrogen was analyzed. This study allowed us to identify the derivative with the methyl group at the N(8) pyrazole combined with the 4-methoxyphenylcarbamoyl moiety at the N(5) position as the compound with the best binding profile in terms of both affinity and selectivity (hA(3) = 0.2 nM, hA(1)/hA(3) = 5485, hA(2A)/hA(3) = 6950, hA(2B)/hA(3) = 1305). All the compounds proved to be full antagonists in a specific functional model where the inhibition of cAMP generation by IB-MECA was measured in membranes of CHO cells stably transfected with the human A(3) receptor. The new compounds are among the most potent and selective A(3) antagonists so far described. The derivatives with higher affinity at human A(3) adenosine receptors proved to be antagonists, in the cAMP assay, capable of inhibiting the effect of IB-MECA with IC(50) values in the nanomolar range, with a trend strictly similar to that observed in the binding assay. Also a molecular modeling study was carried out, with the aim to identify possible pharmacophore maps. In fact, a sterically controlled structure-activity relationship was found for the N(8) pyrazole substituted derivatives, showing a correlation between the calculated molecular volume of pyrazolo[4,3-e]1,2, 4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine derivatives and their experimental K(i) values.

Binding of [3H]MSX-2 (3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-7-methyl-8-(m-methoxystyryl)-1-propargylxanthine) to rat striatal membranes--a new, selective antagonist radioligand for A(2A) adenosine receptors

The present study describes the preparation and binding properties of a new, potent, and selective A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) antagonist radioligand, [3H]3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-7-methyl-8-(m-methoxystyryl)-1-propargy lxanth ine ([3H]MSX-2). [3H]MSX-2 binding to rat striatal membranes was saturable and reversible. Saturation experiments showed that [3H]MSX-2 labeled a single class of binding sites with high affinity (K(d)=8.0 nM) and limited capacity (B(max)=1.16 fmol.mg(-1) of protein). The presence of 100 microM GTP, or 10 mM magnesium chloride, respectively, had no effect on [3H]MSX-2 binding. AR agonists competed with the binding of 1 nM [3H]MSX-2 with the following order of potency: 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA)>2-[4-(carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxami doaden osine (CGS-21680)>2-chloroadenosine (2-CADO)>N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA). AR antagonists showed the following order of potency: 8-(m-bromostyryl)-3, 7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (BS-DMPX)>1, 3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX)>(R)-5, 6-dimethyl-7-(1-phenylethyl)-2-(4-pyridyl)-7H-pyrrolo[2, 3-d]pyrimidine-4-amine (SH-128)>3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX)>caffeine. The K(i) values for antagonists were in accordance with data from binding studies with the agonist radioligand [3H]CGS21680, while agonist affinities were 3-7-fold lower. [3H]MSX-2 is a highly selective A(2A) AR antagonist radioligand exhibiting a selectivity of at least two orders of magnitude versus all other AR subtypes. The new radioligand shows high specific radioactivity (85 Ci/mmol, 3150 GBq/mmol) and acceptable nonspecific binding at rat striatal membranes of 20-30%, at 1 nM.

Further characterization of a CNS adenosine A2a receptor ligand [11C]KF18446 with in vitro autoradiography and in vivo tissue uptake

PET assessment of the adenosine A2a receptors localized in the striatum offers us a potential new diagnostic tool for neurological disorders. In the present study, we carried out in vitro receptor autoradiography of a newly developed PET ligand [11C]KF18446 ([7-methyl-11C]-(E)-8-(3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)-1,3,7-trimethylxanthin e) with rat brain sections. [11C]KF18446 showed a high striatum/cortex binding ratio (5.0) and low nonspecific binding (<10%), suggesting that [11C]KF18446 has characteristics comparable or slightly superior to [3H]CGS 21680 or [3H]SCH 58261, which are currently available representative A2a receptor ligands. Scatchard analysis indicated a Kd of 9.8 nM and a Bmax of 170 fmol/mm3 tissue in the striatum and a Kd of 16.4 nM and a Bmax of 33 fmol/mm3 tissue in the cortex. Seven xanthine-type and four nonxanthine-type adenosine receptor ligands with an affinity for the adenosine A2a receptors significantly reduced the in vitro binding of [11C]KF18446 to the brain section. The blocking effects were much stronger in the striatum than in the cortex, but did not necessarily parallel their affinity. On the other hand, four xanthine-type ligands and one nonxanthine-type ligand (SCH 58261) of the 11 ligands studied reduced the in vivo uptake of [11C]KF18446 in mice, but other ligands, including A1-selective and nonselective ligands and three nonxanthine-type A2a-selective antagonists did not. We conclude that [11C]KF18446 is a promising adenosine A2a receptor ligand for PET study.

Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of [3H]-MRE 3008-F20: the first high affinity radioligand antagonist for the human A3 adenosine receptors

The synthesis and the preliminary biological evaluation of the first high affinity radioligand antagonist for the human A3 adenosine receptor, named [3H]-MRE 3008-F20 are reported. [3H]-MRE 3008-20 bound human A3 receptors expressed in CHO cells with K(D) and Bmax value of 0.82 +/- 0.08 nM and 297 +/- 28 fmol/mg of protein, respectively. [3H]-MRE 3008-F20 represents a useful tool for a further characterization of A3 adenosine receptor subtype.

Reciprocal interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells co-transfected with the two receptors

Human adenosine A2A and rat dopamine D2 receptors (A2A and D2 receptors) were co-transfected in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to study the interactions between two receptors that are co-localized in striatopallidal gamma-aminobutyric acid-(GABA)ergic neurons. Membranes from transfected cells showed a high density of D2 (3.6 pmol per mg protein) and A2A receptors (0.56 pmol per mg protein). The D2 receptors were functional: an agonist, quinpirole, could stimulate GTPgammaS binding and reduce stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. The A2A receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) decreased high-affinity binding of the agonist dopamine at D2 receptors. Activation of adenosine A2A receptors shifted the dose-response curve for quinpirole on adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) to the right. However, CGS 21680 did not affect dopamine D2 receptor-induced GTPgammaS binding, but did cause a concentration-dependent increase in cAMP accumulation. The maximal cAMP response was decreased by the D2 agonist quinpirole in a concentration-dependent manner, but there was no change in EC50 and no effect in cells transfected only with adenosine A2A receptors. A2A receptor activation also increased phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein and expression of c-fos mRNA. These effects were also strongly counteracted by quinpirole. These results show that the antagonistic actions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors noted previously in vivo can also be observed in CHO cells where the two receptors are co-transfected. Thus, no brain cell-specific factors are required for such interactions. Furthermore, the interaction at the second messenger level and beyond may be quantitatively more important than A2A receptor-mediated inhibition of high affinity D2 agonist binding to the receptor.

Adenosine and dopamine receptor antagonist binding in the rat ventral and dorsal striatum: lack of changes after a neonatal bilateral lesion of the ventral hippocampus

There is experimental evidence from radioligand binding experiments for the existence of strong antagonistic interactions between different subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum, mainly between adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 and between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. These interactions seem to be more powerful in the ventral compared to the dorsal striatum, which might have some implications for the treatment of schizophrenia. The binding characteristics of different dopamine and adenosine receptor subtypes were analysed in the different striatal compartments (dorsolateral striatum and shell and core of the nucleus accumbens), by performing saturation experiments with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist [125I]SCH-23982, the dopamine D2-3 receptor antagonist [3H]raclopride, the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist [3H]DPCPX and the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist [3H]SCH 58261. The experiments were also performed in rats with a neonatal bilateral lesion of the ventral hippocampus (VH), a possible animal model of schizophrenia. Both dopamine D2-3 and adenosine A2A receptors follow a similar pattern, with a lower density of receptors (40%) in the shell of the nucleus accumbens compared with the dorsolateral caudate-putamen. A lower density of adenosine A1 receptors (20%) was also found in the shell of the nucleus accumbens compared with the caudate-putamen. On the other hand, dopamine D1 receptors showed a similar density in the different striatal compartments. Therefore, differences in receptor densities cannot explain the stronger interactions between adenosine and dopamine receptors found in the ventral, compared to the dorsal striatum. No statistical differences in the binding characteristics of any of the different adenosine and dopamine receptor antagonists used were found between sham-operated and VH-lesioned rats.

Differences in the order of potency for agonists but not antagonists at human and rat adenosine A2A receptors

To examine possible species differences in pharmacology, rat adenosine A2A receptors were studied in PC12 (pheochromocytoma) cells, and human receptors in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the cloned human A2A receptor cDNA. Using [3H]-5-amino-7(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine ([3H]-SCH 58261) as radioligand, the estimated Bmax (maximal binding) was 538 and 2085 fmol/mg in CHO and PC12 cells, respectively. The Kd (dissociation constant) values for [3H]-SCH 58261 were 1.05 and 5.6 nM in the two cell types, respectively. The order of potency of antagonists and most agonists was the same in both cell types, but 2-phenylaminoadenosine and 2-chloroadenosine were relatively less potent in PC12 cells than in CHO cells. In the functional assay, using cyclic AMP accumulation, all agonists tested were more potent in CHO than in PC12 cells, but this could not be readily explained by differences in adenylyl cyclase or in the expression of G proteins. As in the case of binding, the relative agonist potencies were similar for most compounds, but 2-phenylaminoadenosine and 2-chloroadenosine were more potent at human A2A receptors in CHO cells than predicted from the data obtained on rat A2A receptors in PC12 cells. Antagonists were approximately equipotent in the two cells. These results show that, despite only small differences in amino acid sequences and no difference in antagonist pharmacology, the relative order of potency of receptor agonists can differ between species homologues of the adenosine A2A receptor.