Effects of tedisamil (KC-8857) on cardiac electrophysiology and ventricular fibrillation in the rabbit isolated heart

Tedisamil: a new novel antiarrhythmic

Solvay Pharmaceuticals is currently developing tedisamil (KC-8857), a novel antiarrhythmic with additional anti-ischaemic properties, which acts via potassium channel blockade. This drug can be categorised as a class III antiarrhythmic agent due to its effects of action potential and QT interval prolongation in these patients. This agent was initially developed for its anti-ischaemic properties and Phase I trials have shown tedisamil to be an effective bradycardic agent, as well as causing a reverse rate-dependent QT interval prolongation. Subsequent Phase II results have confirmed that in patients with ischaemic heart disease, tedisamil had beneficial haemodynamic and anti-ischaemic effects. Phase III studies in patients with ischaemic heart disease indicated that tedisamil is an effective agent for the treatment of angina, resulting in a dose-dependent increase in anginal threshold (with a decrease in anginal attacks, increased exercise capacity during treadmill exercise and decreased electrocardiographic signs of exercise induced ischaemia) in comparison to placebo. Although tedisamil has been shown to be an effective anti-ischaemic agent, with Phase III trials for angina pectoris now completed, the company are now pursuing the use of tedisamil for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, for which tedisamil is still in Phase II/III clinical trials. Launch data are not yet known.

Tedisamil attenuates foetal transformation of myosin in the hypertrophied rat myocardium

1 Reduction in repolarizing potassium currents has controversial effects on hypertrophic responses in cardiomyocytes of transgenic models and cultured cardiomyocytes. It remains thus unknown whether a blockade of potassium channels with tedisamil (N,N'dicyclopropylmethylene-9,9-tetramethylene-3,7-diazabicyclo(3.3.1)nonane dihydrochloride) has any effects on cardiac growth during postnatal development or pressure overload. 2 To test the hypothesis that a treatment with tedisamil affects cardiac growth or protein phenotype, sham-operated rats and rats with ascending aorta constriction were treated with tedisamil (36 mg kg day(-1)) for 7 weeks. Left ventricular mass and geometry, relative expression of myosin isoforms, hydroxyproline concentration and isovolumic ventricular function were assessed. 3 Rats with aortic constriction exhibited a marked increase in left ventricular weight and the diastolic pressure-volume relationship was shifted to smaller volumes. The hydroxyproline concentration remained unaltered. The proportion of alpha-myosin heavy chains was, however, reduced (P<0.05). Hypertrophied left ventricles manifested an enhanced overall performance but depressed myocardial contractility. 4 Administration of tedisamil was associated with decreased heart rate (P<0.05). In contrast, cardiac growth in sham-operated rats and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy of pressure-overloaded animals was not significantly altered. Hypertrophied hearts from rats treated with tedisamil expressed more alpha-myosin heavy chains (65+/-4 versus 57+/-4%; P<0.05). Also, maximal rate of wall stress rise and decline was higher (P<0.05) in tedisamil-treated pressure-overloaded rats. 5 In the rat model of pressure-overloaded hypertrophy, tedisamil had no effect on cardiac growth but partially corrected myocardial dysfunction. Postulated mechanism of this effect is the phenotype modification of myosin filaments in hypertrophied myocardium.

Atrial fibrillation: epidemiologic considerations and rationale for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm

Atrial fibrillation is now the most common cardiac arrhythmia for which a patient is hospitalized. Clinically, it presents in a form that is paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent and may be symptomatic or asymptomatic, occurring in the setting of either no cardiac disease ("lone atrial fibrillation") or, most often, in association with an underlying disease. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality and, in the United States alone, causes over 75,000 cases of stroke per year. The annual prevalence of stroke is 5% to 7%, but the use of adequate anticoagulation can reduce this to less than 1%. Atrial fibrillation is a disorder of the elderly, with almost equal prevalence in men and women. In the United States, 80% of atrial fibrillation occurs in patients over the age of 65 years, and its prevalence tracks that of heart failure, which may be the cause, as well as the result, of the arrhythmia. Both conditions are increasing in epidemic proportions in the aging population. The most common causes of atrial fibrillation are hypertensive heart disease, coronary artery disease, and heart failure with a miscellany of lesser conditions, with about 10% lacking structural heart disease. Unlike other supraventricular arrhythmias, cure by the use of catheter ablation and surgical techniques has not been a reality except in a relatively small number of cases. However, restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm remain the initial goal of therapy for most patients. Pharmacologic approaches remain the mainstay of therapy for rate control and anticoagulation as well as for maintenance of sinus rhythm following pharmacological or electrical conversion. The changing epidemiology of atrial fibrillation is highlighted, with the focus on its conversion by the use of newer and novel antifibrillatory agents relative to the mechanisms of the arrhythmia, to restore the stability of sinus rhythm.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation: focus on new agents

The precise mechanisms of clinical effect of antiarrhythmic agents and the ideal "molecular targets" against arrhythmias, in particular atrial fibrillation, are poorly understood. Current antiarrhythmic drug development, particularly for drugs expected to be active against atrial fibrillation, has focused on drugs with multiple ionic mechanisms of action, in particular on those that block multiple potassium channels. Investigation of antiarrhythmic agents is complicated by the diversity of animal-disease models studied, by the potential multiple mechanisms of arrhythmias, and by the incompletely understood relationships between risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Furthermore, rhythm control strategies in large groups of patients with atrial fibrillation have failed to show substantial clinical benefit. Nevertheless, drugs that block multiple potassium channels and appear to have relatively little organ toxicity, such as tedisamil, may represent an important new avenue in the therapeutic approach to highly symptomatic arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation.

Effects of tedisamil on cardiovascular tissues isolated from normo- and hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to characterize the effects of tedisamil on isolated rat cardiovascular tissues, and identify actions that could be beneficial or detrimental in the treatment of cardiac disease.

RESULTS

Tedisamil prolonged the Wistar Kyoto normotensive rat (WKY) left ventricular action potential and augmented the force of contraction of left ventricle strips. On the 12-month-old SHR model of cardiac hypertrophy, the augmenting effects of tedisamil at 10(-6) and 3 x 10(-6) M were reduced. On the 21-month-old SHR model of heart failure, the augmenting effects of tedisamil at 10(-6) and 3 x 10(-6) M were further reduced. The augmenting effect of tedisamil at 10(-5) M was reduced to 47%. The rate of the right atrium of 16- to 17-month-old WKY was reduced by tedisamil at 10(-5) and 10(-4) M, and tedisamil had a similar effect on the SHR right atrium. Tedisamil at 10(-6)--3 x 10(-5) M contracted the portal veins of WKY and aortae of 12-month-old WKY and SHR.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effects of tedisamil in the rat, which are partially or fully maintained in hypertrophied or failing myocardium would be beneficial in the treatment of heart failure. In contrast, the vasoconstrictor action of tedisamil will be detrimental in heart failure.

Tedisamil and dofetilide-induced torsades de pointes, rate and potassium dependence

1. Tedisamil is a bradycardiac agent that prolongs the QT interval of the ECG and prevents cardiac arrhythmias. Given this profile, tedisamil might be expected to have proarrhythmic actions similar to Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. To address this question, the actions of dofetilide and tedisamil were examined in rabbit isolated hearts in which bradycardia was induced by AV ablation. 2. The QT interval was prolonged in a reverse rate-dependent fashion by dofetilide (3 and 30 nM) and tedisamil (0.3 and 3 microM). 3. Torsades de pointes was observed in 1/7 hearts treated with 3 nM dofetilide and 0/7 hearts treated with 0.3 microM tedisamil. The incidence of torsades de pointes was increased to 5/7 in hearts treated with 30 nM dofetilide and to 7/7 in hearts treated with 3 microM tedisamil (both P < 0.05 vs control). 4. The actions of 30 nM dofetilide and 3 microM tedisamil were also examined in hearts paced at 50, 100, 200 and 50 beats min(-1) successively. Both drugs caused torsades de pointes in 5/5 hearts paced at 50 beats min(-1); however, the incidence was reduced to 0/5 during pacing at 200 beats min(-1). Thus, drug-induced proarrhythmia was bradycardia-dependent. 5. Drug-induced prolongation of the interval between the peak and end of the T-wave (QTa-e) was reverse rate-dependent and was associated with the occurrence of torsades de pointes (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). 6. The results suggest that tedisamil, like dofetilide, presents a risk for development of torsades de pointes.

Tedisamil: master switch of nature?

Decreasing heart rate is potentially useful in ischaemic heart disease. Tedisamil is a bradycardic agent resulting from its ability to inhibit transient outward current (I(to)) in atria. Tedisamil inhibits I(to), potassium current (IK), K(ATP) and the protein kinase A-activated chloride channel in ventricles as well as vascular IK and Ca(2+)-activated IK (IK((Ca))). Tedisamil prolongs cardiac action potentials and the corrected QT (QTc) of the ECG and also increases cardiac refractoriness. Tedisamil is anti-arrhythmic in animal models of ventricular arrhythmias and atrial flutter. The bradycardic effect of tedisamil is associated with a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand. On isolated rat ventricle, tedisamil is a positive inotrope and on isolated rabbit atria, tedisamil reverses the negative inotropic effect of pinacidil. Tedisamil contracts the isolated rat portal vein and aorta, reduces cromakalim-induced relaxations of contracted rat aorta and increases blood pressure in animals and humans. Tedisamil is 96% bound to plasma proteins, has a plasma half-life of about 10 h and is cleared from the kidney unchanged. Clinical trials have shown that the electrophysiology of tedisamil is that of a class III anti-arrhythmic. In coronary artery disease, tedisamil has no effect on inotropism and increases the threshold for angina. Potassium channel blockade with tedisamil may have advantages over calcium channel blockers or K(ATP) channel openers as an anti-ischaemic mechanism in coronary artery disease. In exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia, beta-blockers are probably favourable to tedisamil, as they will limit the increase in heart rate, contractility and blood pressure caused by sympathetic stimulation, whereas tedisamil will not. In heart failure patients, tedisamil reduces heart rate, but increases blood pressure. The usefulness of tedisamil as a bradycardic agent is limited by the increase in blood pressure. A drug that is bradycardic without increasing blood pressure would be an improvement on tedisamil as the master switch of nature for ischaemic heart disease.

RSD1019 suppresses ischaemia-induced monophasic action potential shortening and arrhythmias in anaesthetized rabbits

The electrophysiological actions of lidocaine, tedisamil and RSD1019 were assessed on normal and ischaemic cardiac tissue using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) recorded from the epicardium of anaesthetized rabbits. Drug effects on ischaemia-induced arrhythmias were assessed simultaneously in the same rabbits. Lidocaine, infused at 2.5, 5 and 10 micromol kg(-1) min(-1) i.v., accelerated and worsened the electrophysiological derangement caused by ischaemia, had profibrillatory actions and reduced the time to the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) relative to controls. Tedisamil, infused at 0.063, 0.125 and 0.25 micromol kg(-1) min(-1) i.v., prolonged MAP duration at 90% repolarization (MAPD(90%)) before induction of ischaemia in a dose-related manner; however, this effect was not maintained 5 min after induction of ischaemia. Tedisamil had no significant antiarrhythmic actions over the dose-range tested. RSD1019, infused at 2, 4 and 8 micromol kg(-1) min(-1) i.v., produced a small increase in MAPD(90%) before induction of ischaemia and only at the highest dose tested. In contrast to tedisamil, RSD1019 suppressed ischaemia-induced MAP shortening assessed 5 min after induction of ischaemia. This effect was dose-related. RSD1019 completely prevented ischaemia-induced tachyarrhythmias at the mid and highest infusion levels tested. The results of this study illustrate a pathologically targeted approach for preventing ischaemia-induced arrhythmias. Suppression of ischaemia-induced MAP shortening, demonstrated herein for RSD1019, represents a novel antifibrillatory approach.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.

Tedisamil in a chronic canine model of atrial flutter

Tedisamil inhibits several cardiac potassium channels including Ito, Ikr, and the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channel (I(KATP)), which may be important in the initiation and maintenance of atrial arrhythmias. We herein report the efficacy of tedisamil in terminating and protecting against the reinduction of atrial flutter (AFL) in a conscious canine model. Sustained AFL (> 15 min) was induced in eight of 10 mongrel dogs by programmed atrial stimulation (PAS) 2-41 days after producing a surgical barrier to conduction in the right atrium. At the time of surgery, an epicardial electrode was attached to the right atrial appendage for pacing and recording. Normal saline, 1 ml/kg, was infused after 15 min of AFL as placebo. Tedisamil (1.0 mg/kg) was given intravenously after 30 min of sustained AFL while recording surface ECGs and atrial electrograms. Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 10 of 10 trials (eight dogs) in a mean time of 20.5 s (SD, +/- 11.8 s). Tedisamil had a negative chronotropic effect lasting > or =2 h and was protective against the reinduction of AFL. In five dogs, PAS was able to induce AFL in only two of seven trials 2 h after drug infusion. The corrected QT interval (QTc) was lengthened for the first 15 min after tedisamil administration (mean, +/- 39.3 ms; p < 0.05), but thereafter returned to baseline. The QRS interval was not altered by tedisamil. Saline alone, given after 15 min of sustained AFL, converted AFL in one of 11 trials (eight dogs) but did not alter the RR interval, QTc, or QRS interval compared with values measured during AFL. No significant adverse effects of tedisamil were observed. The results indicate that tedisamil is effective in interrupting and/or preventing reinduction of canine AFL, possibly by prolonging atrial refractoriness through inhibition of one or more potassium ion repolarizing currents in atrial muscle. Further studies are required to address the exact mechanism by which tedisamil exerts its antiarrhythmic effect.

What should we expect from the next generation of antiarrhythmic drugs?

Five drugs currently constitute approximately 70% of the world market for antiarrhythmic medications. Since the publication of studies documenting that certain Class I drugs may increase mortality in high-risk postinfarction patients, basic science and clinical studies have focused on Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. However, drugs that prolong repolarization and cardiac refractoriness are sometimes associated with potentially lethal torsades de pointes. Amiodarone, a multichannel blocker, may be the exception to this observation, but it nevertheless fails to reduce total mortality compared with placebo in high-risk patients following myocardial infarction. However, Class III agents remain the focus of drug development efforts because they lack the negative hemodynamic effects, affect both atrial and ventricular tissue, and can be administered as either parenteral or oral preparations. Developers of newer antiarrhythmic agents have focused on identifying antiarrhythmic medications with the following characteristics: appropriate modification of the arrhythmia substrate, suppression of arrhythmia triggers, efficacy in pathologic tissues and states, positive rate dependency, appropriate pharmacokinetics, equally effective oral and parenteral formulations, similar efficacy in arrhythmias and their surrogates, few side effects, positive frequency blocking actions, and cardiac-selective ion channel blockade. New and investigational agents that more closely approach these goals include azimilide, dofetilide, dronedarone, ersentilide, ibutilide, tedisamil, and trecetilide. In the near future, medications will increasingly constitute only part of an antiarrhythmic strategy. Instead of monotherapy, they will often be used in conjunction with an implanted device. Combination therapy offers many potential advantages. Long-term goals of antiarrhythmic therapy include upstream approaches, such as identification of the biochemical intermediaries of the process and, eventually, of molecular and genetic lesions involved in arrhythmogenesis.

Antifibrillatory efficacy of long-term tedisamil administration in a postinfarcted canine model of ischemic ventricular fibrillation

The electrophysiologic and antifibrillatory properties of tedisamil (KC-8857) were studied in vivo in a conscious canine model of sudden cardiac death. Male mongrel dogs were anesthetized, and surgical anterior myocardial infarction was induced by a 2-h occlusion, with reperfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Three to five days after infarction, dogs were subjected to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) to identify those at risk for ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation. Previous studies documented that dogs with a significant anterior-wall infarction develop ventricular tachycardia in response to PES and are at an increased risk for sudden cardiac death on imposition of a transient ischemic event in a region remote from the infarct-related artery. PES-inducible animals were randomized to either oral placebo or oral tedisamil treatment (3 mg/kg, b.i.d for 4 days, Group 1, n = 8). Control animals received empty gelatin capsules (Group 2, n = 8). The effective refractory period and QTc interval were unchanged after 3 days of oral placebo or tedisamil dosing. Arrhythmic activity after drug administration was not observed in dogs treated with tedisamil. PES induction of ventricular tachycardia was reduced significantly in the tedisamil-treated group (100% inducible before drug vs. 9% inducible after drug; p < 0.05). In the sudden-cardiac-death protocol, tedisamil reduced the incidence of lethal ischemic arrhythmias developing in response to acute posterolateral myocardial ischemia. Tedisamil-treated animals exhibited a 100% compared with a 25% survival rate in the control group (p < 0.05). Anterior-wall infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the left ventricle, did not differ between groups: Group 1 = 20 +/- 1%; Group 2 = 22 +/- 1%. Our findings suggest that tedisamil might be useful in the prevention of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in myocardial ischemic injury.

Tedisamil Attenuates Ventricular Fibrillation in a Conscious Canine Model of Sudden Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic and antifibrillatory properties of tedisamil (KC-8857;3,7-di-(cyclopropylmethyl)-9,9-tetramethylene-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]-nonane dihydrochloride) were studied in a conscious canine model of sudden cardiac death. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three to five days after surgically induced myocardial infarction (2-hour occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery), animals were subjected to programmed electrical stimulation to identify those at risk for ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation. Sixty minutes after tedisamil (10 mg/kg, administered orally) PES was repeated. Tedisamil increased the ventricular effective refractory period from 106 +/- 6 to 134 +/- 7 ms (P <.05) compared to placebo treatment, which did not alter the ERP (123 +/- 6 to 116 +/- 5 ms). Tedisamil prolonged the QTc interval, from a predrug value of 308 +/- 14 to 327 +/- 14 ms, postdrug. The extent of the surgically induced anterior wall myocardial infarct did not differ between groups, tedisamil, 29 +/- 2%, and placebo, 28 +/- 2% of the left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: Tedisamil conferred protection against ischemia induced ventricular fibrillation; 7 of 10 tedisamil-treated dogs survived, compared to 4 of 14 surviving in the vehicle treated group (P <.05). Although we observed instances of vomiting and/or diarrhea in several dogs after a single oral administration of tedisamil, the data indicate that oral administration of tedisamil provides protection from ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation in the postinfarcted conscious canine. The mechanism by which tedisamil achieves its antifibrillatory effect may be related to its ability to prolong the ERP of the ventricular myocardium without altering ventricular conduction velocity.