Virological profiles in hepatitis B virus inactive carriers: monthly evaluation in 1-year follow-up study

Fluctuation of Viremia in Hepatitis B Virus–Infected Healthcare Workers Performing Exposure-Prone Procedures in the Netherlands

Objective

To determine the longitudinal changes in viral load of hepatitis B virus (HBV)–infected healthcare workers (HCWs) and its consequences for exclusion of infected HCWs performing exposure-prone procedures, various HBV DNA safety thresholds, and the frequency of monitoring.

Design

Retrospective cohort study June 1, 1996–January 31, 2013.

Participants

In the Netherlands, chronically HBV-infected HCWs performing exposure-prone procedures are notified to the Committee for Prevention of Iatrogenic Hepatitis B. Of the 126 notified HCWs, 45 had 2 or more HBV DNA levels determined without antiviral therapy.

Methods

A time-to-event analysis for HBV-infected HCWs categorized in various viremia levels surpassing a HBV DNA threshold level of 1×105 copies/mL, above which exposure-prone procedures are not allowed in the Netherlands.

Results

Fluctuations of HBV DNA in follow-up samples ranged from −5.4 to +2.2 log10 copies/mL. A high correlation was seen for each HBV DNA level with the 3 previous levels. In a time-to-event analysis, after 6 months 7.2%, 6.5%, and 14.3% of individuals had surpassed the threshold of 1×105 copies/mL for viral load categories 4.8×103 to 1.5×104; 1.5×104 to 4.0×104; and 4.0×104 to 1.0×105, respectively.

Conclusions

We propose standard retesting every 6 months, with more frequent retesting just below the high threshold value (1×105 copies/mL), and prolonging this standard interval to 1 year after 3 consecutive levels below the threshold in policies with lower safety thresholds (1×103 or 1×104 copies/mL).

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:655–660

Total Hepatitis B Core Antigen Antibody, a Quantitative Non-Invasive Marker of Hepatitis B Virus Induced Liver Disease

Non invasive immunologic markers of virus-induced liver disease are unmet needs. We tested the clinical significance of quantitative total and IgM-anti-HBc in well characterized chronic-HBsAg-carriers. Sera (212) were obtained from 111 HBsAg-carriers followed-up for 52 months (28-216) during different phases of chronic-HBV-genotype-D-infection: 10 HBeAg-positive, 25 inactive-carriers (HBV-DNA≤2000IU/ml, ALT<30U/L), 66 HBeAg-negative-CHB-patients and 10 with HDV-super-infection. In 35 patients treated with Peg-IFN±nucleos(t)ide-analogues (NUCs) sera were obtained at baseline, end-of-therapy and week-24-off-therapy and in 22 treated with NUCs (for 60 months, 42-134m) at baseline and end-of-follow-up. HBsAg and IgM-anti-HBc were measured by Architect-assays (Abbott, USA); total-anti-HBc by double-antigen-sandwich-immune-assay (Wantai, China); HBV-DNA by COBAS-TaqMan (Roche, Germany). Total-anti-HBc were detectable in all sera with lower levels in HBsAg-carriers without CHB (immune-tolerant, inactive and HDV-superinfected, median 3.26, range 2.26-4.49 Log₁₀ IU/ml) versus untreated-CHB (median 4.68, range 2.76-5.54 Log₁₀ IU/ml), p<0.0001. IgM-anti-HBc positive using the chronic-hepatitis-cut-off" (0.130-S/CO) were positive in 102 of 212 sera (48.1%). Overall total-anti-HBc and IgM-anti-HBc correlated significantly (p<0.001, r=0.417). Total-anti-HBc declined significantly in CHB patients with response to Peg-IFN (p<0.001) and in NUC-treated patients (p<0.001); the lowest levels (median 2.68, range 2.12-3.08 Log₁₀ IU/ml) were found in long-term responders who cleared HBsAg subsequently. During spontaneous and therapy-induced fluctuations of CHB (remissions and reactivations) total- and IgM-anti-HBc correlated with ALT (p<0.001, r=0.351 and p=0.008, r=0.185 respectively). Total-anti-HBc qualifies as a useful marker of HBV-induced-liver-disease that might help to discriminate major phases of chronic HBV infection and to predict sustained response to antivirals.

Rates and risk factors for hepatitis B reactivation in a cohort of persons in the inactive phase of chronic hepatitis B-Alaska, 2001-2010

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of reactivation of hepatitis B has been documented among immunosuppressed individuals in the inactive phase of chronic hepatitis B; However, the proportion of and the risk factors for reactivation are largely unknown among non-immunosuppressed persons.

OBJECTIVES

Estimate the incidence rate of and risk factors for hepatitis B reactivation in a population-based cohort of persons in the inactive phase of chronic hepatitis B in Alaska.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort of 414 Alaska Native Persons in the inactive phase of hepatitis B (HBV DNA<2000 IU/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) for 12 months) was followed-up for 10 years. Reactivation of hepatitis B was defined as HBV DNA≥2000 IU/mL and ALT≥40 IU/L. Cox-proportional hazards regression models were used to identify factors associated with reactivation.

RESULTS

A total of 36 (9%) persons had reactivation during 2984 person-years of follow-up, with an annual incidence of 1.2%. Persons aged ≥50 years (1.8%) at study entry had the highest incidence rates of reactivation although incidence rates were not significantly different by age group. Risk factors for hepatitis B reactivation were male sex (Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.17-4.96), HBV DNA≥1000 IU/mL at study entry (HR=7.61; 95% CI: 2.81-20.6), and HBV genotype B (HR=6.08; 95% CI: 1.32-28.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of hepatitis B reactivation was low during the 10 years of follow-up. However, given the higher risk of reactivation than their counterparts, males, and those with HBV DNA≥1000 IU/mL need to be followed-up more frequently.

Analysis of carriers of hepatitis B virus from a tertiary referral hospital: does the viral load change during the natural course of infection?

This study was designed to determine the prevalence, forms of transmission, mutational profile and viral load at baseline of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in Delhi. HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients were enrolled and evaluated clinically for liver function, serological markers for hepatitis B and HBV DNA quantitation. Tests were carried out again 1 year later and the results were compared. Liver biopsy was carried out on all carriers with active viral replication. HBV DNA-positive samples were subjected to polymerase chain reaction single-stranded conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) to screen mutations in the Precore, core, and the X-gene prior to sequencing analysis. Among the 100 patients examined, HBeAg was detected in 23% and 40% were HBV DNA-positive. Of the 40 HBV DNA-positive cases, 8 had precore/core mutations, [G1896A (10%), T2066A (12.5%), T2050C (10%), and G1888A (7.5%)]. No X gene mutants were detected. Reduction in viral load was higher in HBeAg-positive patients, as compared to HBeAg-negative patients, over 1 year. At follow-up, 2/8 HBV mutants corresponded with altered liver function and morphological changes suggestive of chronic hepatitis. One patient was re-designated as DNA-negative on follow-up and had wild-type virus infection with a relatively low viral load. The predominant route for HBV transmission was determined to be parenteral. Twenty percent of the HBV carriers were infected with precore and core mutant HBV. Although the clinical and biochemical profiles of these HBV carriers remained largely stable on follow-up, there was evidence of spontaneous reduction in the mean viral load over the 1-year study period.

Performance characteristics of microparticle enzyme and chemiluminescence immunoassays for measurement of anti-HBc immunoglobulin M in sera of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection

The IMx, AxSym, and Architect immunoglobulin M anti-HBc assay systems for detecting hepatitis B virus e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection were compared. Despite good intra- and interassay coefficients of variation, significantly different values and low correlation (overestimation by AxSym and underestimation by Architect) were observed. Association and cutoff values for distinguishing patients with viral replication should be established for all methods.

Quantitative analysis of HBsAg, IgM anti-HBc and anti-HBc avidity in acute and chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We evaluated hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers by novel, quantitative immunoassays in order to study their behaviours and possible role in the various phases of HBV infection.

STUDY DESIGN

The quantitative determination of HBsAg and anti-HBc/IgM by chemiluminescent immunoassays (Abbott Architect) and the calculation of anti-HBc avidity index have been carried out on repository specimens from patients with acute or chronic hepatitis B.

RESULTS

In acute hepatitis the levels of HBsAg were generally >10,000 UI/mL and decreased sharply in the recovery phase. In 35 anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis cases HBsAg levels were generally lower than 10,000 UI/mL (mean: 2655), whereas in five HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis patients the mean value was 78,756 UI/mL and 90% of specimens exceeded 10,000 UI/mL. The lowest values (mean: 1029 IU/mL) were found in the seven patients with minimal hepatic damage. IgM anti-HBc antibodies were positive in all acute cases and in 68/207 samples (32.85%) from patients with chronic hepatitis, with significantly lower levels (average sample/cutoff (S/CO) ratio: 2.95 in chronic cases versus 25.96 in acute cases; p<0.005). A S/CO value of 10 for anti-HBc IgM had a 100% negative predictive value and a 99.13% positive predictive value for acute hepatitis B. The study of anti-HBc avidity by an experimental procedure showed that an avidity index (AI) threshold of 0.7 had a good efficacy to discriminate the cases of chronic hepatitis, among whom only 2 specimens out of 193 (1.04%) had an AI<0.7.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative determination of HBsAg, anti-HBc/IgM and anti-HBc avidity provides additional information and may be useful in the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic HBV infections and in the follow-up of chronically infected patients.

Clinical and virological improvement of hepatitis B virus-related or hepatitis C virus-related chronic hepatitis with concomitant hepatitis A virus infection

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical and virological characteristics of hepatitis A virus infection in persons concomitantly infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV).

METHODS

We enrolled 21 patients with acute hepatitis A and chronic hepatitis with no sign of liver cirrhosis, 13 patients who were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (case B group), 8 patients who were anti-HCV positive (case C group), and 21 patients with acute hepatitis A without a preexisting liver disease (control A group). Two control groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (control B group) or C (control C group) were also chosen. All control groups were pair-matched by age and sex with the corresponding case group.

RESULTS

Fulminant hepatitis A was never observed, and hepatitis A had a severe course in 1 patient in the case B group and in 1 patient in the control A group. Both patients recovered. On admission, HBV DNA was detected in 1 patient in the case B group (7.7%) and in 13 patients (50%) in the control B group; HCV RNA was found in no patient in the case C group and in 16 patients (81.2%) in the control C group. Of 9 patients in the case B group who were followed up for 6 months, 3 became negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, 2 remained positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and negative for HBV DNA, and 4 became positive for HBV DNA with a low viral load [corrected] Of 6 patients in the case C group who were followed up for 6 months, 3 remained negative for HCV RNA, and 3 had persistently low viral loads.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant hepatitis A was always self-limited, associated with a marked inhibition of HBV and HCV genomes, and possibly had a good prognosis for the underlying chronic hepatitis.