Tumor growth-promoting cellular host response during liver atrophy after portal occlusion

Acute portal hypertension using portal vein ligation abrogates TRAIL expression of liver-resident NK cells

The effects of acute portal hypertension (PHT), which is reported as poor prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, are not well known on the liver immune system, including natural killer (NK) cells. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate how acute PHT influences the functions and characteristics of liver‐resident NK (lr‐NK) cells using an acute PHT mouse model. Acute PHT decreased the number of tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis‐inducing ligand (TRAIL⁺) lr‐NK cells by about 20% and attenuated cytotoxic activity against the Hepa1‐6 cell line by about 40%. Among various cytokine, only interleukin‐33 (IL‐33), which inhibits NK activity, significantly increased after portal vein ligation (PVL). Because lr‐NK cells highly expressed ST2/IL‐33R, IL‐33 co‐culture significantly suppressed TRAIL expression on lr‐NK cells by about 50%, and IL‐33 administration markedly decreased TRAIL expression and cytotoxic activity of lr‐NK cells. Furthermore, the TRAIL⁺ NK cells population was maintained by anti‐IL33 antibody or following portosystemic shunt procedure even after PVL. Finally, we demonstrated that IL‐33 decreased TRAIL expression in lr‐NK cells via AKT–forkhead box O (FoxO) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Conclusion: This work demonstrates that PHT suppresses the TRAIL⁺ lr‐NK cell population and antitumor activities in the liver. Additionally, Akt‐FoxO and MAPK signaling pathways attenuate the TRAIL expression in lt‐NK cells via IL‐33 receptor in mice.

[Contralateral hepatic hypertrophy following unilateral yttrium-90 radioembolization : Implications for liver surgery]

BACKGROUND

Preservation of an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) is the principal limitation to liver surgery in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies. Hence, methods to increase the volume of the FLR in preparation for liver resection are gaining in importance.

OBJECTIVE

In addition to the traditional methods for induction of FLR hypertrophy, such as portal vein embolization (PVE) or portal vein ligation (PVL) with or without parenchymal dissection (ALPPS, in situ split), radioembolization (RE) using yttrium-90 microspheres also leads to a volume increase of non-embolized liver parenchyma. This review outlines its potential role as an alternative procedure for induction of liver hypertrophy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Synopsis and critical discussion of the available literature on the mechanisms of induction of liver hypertrophy, the advantages and drawbacks of the traditional methods, and current research on volume changes associated with RE as well as their implications for possible clinical use in preparation for liver surgery.

RESULTS

Both PVE and PVL can achieve a substantial contralateral volume gain of up to 70 %. The development of contralateral hypertrophy can be accelerated by dissecting the liver parenchyma along the intended plane of resection in addition to PVL (in situ split). Compared to these methods, RE achieves less contralateral liver hypertrophy; however, this effect should not be disregarded as RE provides effective treatment of ipsilateral liver tumors along with induction of hypertrophy and may be associated with a reduced risk of tumor progression compared to PVE and PVL.

CONCLUSION

The available data suggest that RE can complement the armamentarium of methods for induction of FLR hypertrophy in specific situations. Further studies are needed to establish its definitive role for this indication and are in preparation.

Tumour progression and liver regeneration--insights from animal models

Surgery remains the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases. For patients with multiple bilobar spread, extended hepatectomy might be required to achieve complete margin-free resection. In such cases, portal vein occlusion has been developed to induce preoperative hypertrophy of the future remnant liver and increase the resectability rate. Evidence now suggests that liver regeneration after hepatectomy and portal vein occlusion has a protumorigenic role, either through an upregulation of growth factors and cytokines or by haemodynamic changes in the blood supply to the liver. Experimental studies have reported a stimulatory effect of liver regeneration on the tumoral volume of liver metastases and on the metastatic potential of cells engrafted in the liver; this effect seems to depend on the timing of hepatectomy and portal vein occlusion. However, the variability of animal tumour models that are used for research in experimental colorectal liver metastases might account for some of the inconsistent and conflicting results. This Review presents clinical and experimental data pertaining to whether liver regeneration causes proliferation of tumour cells. We also analyse the different animal models of colorectal liver metastases in use and discuss current controversies in the field.

Impact of portal branch ligation on tissue regeneration, microcirculatory response and microarchitecture in portal blood-deprived and undeprived liver tissue

Partial ligation of portal branches leads to atrophy of the deprived lobes and hypertrophy of the intact lobes. In this study we investigated the microcirculatory response and their consequences on tissue regeneration after left-sided portal branch ligation (PBL) in Sprague-Dawley rats. At day 1 and 3 after PBL the hepatic microcirculation was assessed by intravital microscopy (IVM). In addition histological, immunohistochemical and biochemical techniques were used to determine alterations of hepatic microarchitecture. IVM analysis of the microcirculation of the ligated hepatic lobes revealed significant alterations with a reduction in sinusoidal perfusion rate, a decrease of red blood cell velocity, an increase of sinusoidal diameter and a marked reduction in shear stress at days 1 and 3 after PBL. On the contrary, the non-ligated lobes presented with higher blood flow velocities, marked sinusoidal vasoconstriction and thus, shear stress elevation. In consequence, ligated liver lobes exhibited marked cell apoptosis and necrosis, being accompanied by massive intrahepatic leukocyte accumulation and a ~30% weight loss. The non-ligated liver tissue showed marked PCNA expression and thereby completely compensated weight loss. Beside full restoration of liver mass, sinusoidal blood flow was comparable in ligated and non-ligated lobes as well as in sham-treated controls. This study shows that the liver aims at constant tissue mass and blood flow, most probably for maintenance of adequate clearance function. In addition, it supports the hypothesis that shear stress plays a pivotal role in triggering liver hypertrophy in the non-ligated lobes.

Tumour growth following portal branch ligation in an experimental model of liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Portal branch ligation (PBL) is being used increasingly before hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. This study evaluated the effect of PBL on angiogenesis, growth factor expression and tumour growth in a mouse model of hepatic colorectal metastases.

METHODS

CT26.WT cells were implanted into the left liver lobe of BALB/c mice. Animals underwent PBL of the left liver lobe or sham treatment. Angiogenesis, microcirculation, growth factor expression, cell proliferation and tumour growth were studied over 14 and 21 days by intravital multifluorescence microscopy, laser Doppler flowmetry, immunohistochemistry and western blotting.

RESULTS

Left hilar blood flow and tumour microcirculation were significantly diminished during the first 7 days after PBL. This resulted in tumour volume being 20 per cent less than in sham controls by day 14. Subsequently, PBL-treated animals demonstrated recovery of left hilar blood flow and increased expression of hepatocyte growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha, associated with increased cell proliferation and acceleration of growth by day 21.

CONCLUSION

PBL initially reduced vascular perfusion and tumour growth, but this was followed by increased growth factor expression and cell proliferation. This resulted in delayed acceleration of tumour growth, which might explain the stimulated tumour growth observed occasionally after PBL.

Induction of tumor growth after preoperative portal vein embolization: is it a real problem?

Although preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is an effective means to increase future remnant liver (FRL) volume, little has been published on possible adverse effects. This review discusses the clinical and experimental evidence regarding the effect of PVE on tumor growth in both embolized and nonembolized liver lobes, as well as potential strategies to control tumor progression after PVE. A literature review was performed using MEDLINE with keywords related to experimental and clinical studies concerning PVE, portal vein ligation (PVL), and tumor growth. Cross-references and references from reviews were also checked. Clinical and experimental data suggest that tumor progression can occur after preoperative PVE in embolized and nonembolized liver segments. Clinical evidence indicating possible tumor progression in patients with colorectal metastases or with primary liver tumors is based on studies with small sample size. Although multiple studies demonstrated tumor progression, evidence concerning a direct increase in tumor growth rate as a result of PVE is circumstantial. Three possible mechanisms influencing tumor growth after PVE can be recognized, namely changes in cytokines or growth factors, alteration in hepatic blood supply and an enhanced cellular host response promoting local tumor growth after PVE. Post-PVE chemotherapy and sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) before PVE have been proposed to reduce tumor mass after PVE. We conclude that tumor progression can occur after PVE in patients with colorectal metastases as well as in patients with primary liver tumors. However, further research is needed in order to rate this risk of tumor progression after PVE.

Comparative study of portal vein embolization versus portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant using a mini-pig model

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The extent of hepatectomies is limited by the functional reserve of the remnant liver. The introduction of preoperative portal vein occlusion techniques to induce a preoperative hyperplasia of the future liver remnant has reduced the risk of postoperative liver failure. However, it has remained a matter of debate whether partial portal vein embolization (PVE) or suture ligation of the portal branches during exploration is the preferred technique. We compared both techniques under standardized experimental conditions in a large animal model by means of effectiveness and pathophysiologic differences.

METHODS

Thirteen mini-pigs underwent portal vein ligation (PVL), 11 mini-pigs underwent PVE of 75% of the liver volume, and 6 underwent a sham operation. The animals were killed after 28 days. Laboratory liver function and damage parameters, lobar liver-to-body weight indices, portal and arterial flow alterations, and histologic changes were assessed. Ex situ arteriograms and portograms were performed to examine adaptive changes in the macroarchitecture of both vascular systems.

RESULTS

The liver-to-body weight index of the nonoccluded lobe was highest after PVE (0.85) versus 0.6 (P < 0.05) after PVL. There was no significant reduction in global serum parameters reflecting total liver function. After 4 weeks, the PVL group consistently exhibited hepatopetal portal flow in the ligated lobes, which was present but significantly decreased after PVE. The ex situ angiography after PVE and PVL revealed the development of portal neocollaterals in the portal-occluded liver parts.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PVL and PVE are able to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. In comparison, PVE is the more effective technique to increase the future liver remnant. This is due to a more effective, durable occlusion of the portal branches. Formation of collaterals between occluded and nonoccluded liver parts seems to be the cause of inferior regeneration in the ligation group.

Major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: is preoperative portal occlusion an oncological risk factor?

BACKGROUND

This study investigates oncological risks and benefits of portal occlusion (PO) in major resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2004, 107 patients were scheduled for major hepatectomy for CLM. Of these, 53 patients were selected for PO due to insufficient future liver remnant (FLR), and 54 patients had straightforward hepatectomy. Associations of clinicopathologic factors with resectability, and outcome after PO were analyzed.

RESULTS

21 of 53 patients (39.6%) after PO were unresectable. These patients had a significant smaller volume of the FLR than the 32 resected patients after PO (P = .029). In total, 17 patients (80.9%) did not undergo resection due to cancer progression. Among these, 11 patients (52.4%) exhibited either a progression of known metastases located in the occluded lobes, or new metastases in the nonoccluded portion of the liver. In another 4 individuals (19%), the decision against resection resulted from insufficient hypertrophy of the FLR. Following major hepatectomy, the 5-year survival was 43.66%. Although there was a significantly higher rate of extended hepatectomies versus formal hepatectomies (P < .001), more bilobar distributed metastases versus unilobar manifestations (P = .015), and a smaller resection margin (P = .01) in patients who had PO, no adverse effect on mortality, morbidity, recurrence and survival was observed.

CONCLUSION

Unresectability after PO is a major problem that warrants multidisciplinary improvements, and randomization to resection with or without PO remains ethically problematic. However, following adequate patient selection, PO may provide a significant survival benefit for patients with prior unresectable CLM.

Liver regeneration and tumor stimulation--a review of cytokine and angiogenic factors

Liver resection for metastatic (colorectal carcinoma) tumors is often followed by a significant incidence of tumor recurrence. Cellular and molecular changes resulting from hepatectomy and the subsequent liver regeneration process may influence the kinetics of tumor growth and contribute to recurrence. Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that factors involved in liver regeneration may also stimulate the growth of occult tumors and the reactivation of dormant micrometastases. An understanding of the underlying changes may enable alternative strategies to minimize tumor recurrence and improve patient survival after hepatectomy.

Portal branch ligation induces a hepatic arterial buffer response, microvascular remodeling, normoxygenation, and cell proliferation in portal blood-deprived liver tissue

Portal branch ligation (PBL) may prevent liver failure after extended hepatic resection. However, clinical studies indicate that tumors within the ligated lobe develop accelerated growth. Although it is well known that tumor growth depends on the host's microvascularization, there is no information about how PBL affects the hepatic microcirculation. Our aims were to determine hepatic artery response, liver microcirculation, tissue oxygenation, and cell proliferation after PBL. Therefore, we used intravital multifluorescence microscopy, laser-Doppler flowmetry, immunohistochemistry, and biochemical techniques to examine microcirculatory responses, microvascular remodeling, and cellular consequences after left lateral PBL in BALB/c mice. During the first 7 days, PBL induced a reduction of left hilar blood flow by approximately 50%. This resulted in 80% sinusoidal perfusion failure, significant parenchymal hypoxia, and liver atrophy. After 14 days, however, left hilar blood flow was found to be restored. However, remodeling of the microvasculature included a rarefaction of the sinusoidal network, however, without substantial perfusion failure, compensated by a hepatic arterial buffer response and significant sinusoidal dilatation. This resulted in normalization of tissue oxygenation, indicating arterialization of the ligated lobe. Interestingly, late microvascular remodeling was associated with increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression, significant hepatocellular proliferation, and weight gain of the ligated lobe. Thus PBL induces only an initial microcirculatory failure with liver atrophy, followed by a hepatic arterial buffer response, microvascular remodeling, normoxygenation, and hepatocellular proliferation. This may explain the accelerated tumor progression occasionally observed in patients after PBL.