Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Use of Aptamers as Diagnostics Tools and Antiviral Agents for Human Viruses

Appropriate diagnosis is the key factor for treatment of viral diseases. Time is the most important factor in rapidly developing and epidemiologically dangerous diseases, such as influenza, Ebola and SARS. Chronic viral diseases such as HIV-1 or HCV are asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic and the therapeutic success mainly depends on early detection of the infective agent. Over the last years, aptamer technology has been used in a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications and, concretely, several strategies are currently being explored using aptamers against virus proteins. From a diagnostics point of view, aptamers are being designed as a bio-recognition element in diagnostic systems to detect viral proteins either in the blood (serum or plasma) or into infected cells. Another potential use of aptamers is for therapeutics of viral infections, interfering in the interaction between the virus and the host using aptamers targeting host-cell matrix receptors, or attacking the virus intracellularly, targeting proteins implicated in the viral replication cycle. In this paper, we review how aptamers working against viral proteins are discovered, with a focus on recent advances that improve the aptamers' properties as a real tool for viral infection detection and treatment.

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interferon Monotherapy or Combined with Different Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of interferon (IFN) with or without different nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Methods: The PubMed, Wan Fang and CNKI databases were searched to identify relevant trials up to May 2015. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0. The stability and reliability were evaluated by publication bias tests. Results: Fifty-six studies fulfilled the criteria for the meta-analysis. Compared with IFN monotherapy, combination therapy were superior in HBV DNA undetectable rate (Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44–1.66, p < 0.00001), HBeAg and HBsAg loss rate (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22–1.56, p < 0.00001; RR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.03–2.78, p = 0.04, respectively) at the end of week 48 treatment. Sub-analysis showed the RRs of virological response for entecavir (ETV), adefovir (ADV), and lamivudine (LAM) were 1.64, 1.61 and 1.52, respectively; RRs of HBeAg loss rate were 1.34, 1.71 and 1.34, respectively. However, at the end of follow-up, IFN plus NAs therapy was better than IFN monotherapy only in terms of HBV DNA undetectable rate (p = 0.0007). Conclusions: Combination therapy was better than IFN monotherapy in virological and serological responses at the end of treatment. After follow-up, only HBV DNA undetectable rate was superior for combination therapy.

Hepatitis B and elders: An underestimated issue

As the world's population becomes older, the burden of hepatitis B virus in elderly has to be considered. The liver changes with aging and its function is eventually altered. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus is paradoxically more important in elderly in areas having vaccination programs, because of a loosening of the prevention in older patients. Some differences in hepatitis B presentation must be enhanced in elderly: lower spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen clearance after a recent contamination, major risk of cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma. Acute hepatitis B seems to be more often symptomatic, with a great risk of chronicity. Hepatocarcinoma linked to hepatitis B virus has a higher prevalence and a different presentation in elderly. Its treatment is the same as in younger people but is less often possible. Liver transplantation is contraindicated after 70 years old. Hepatitis B treatment panel is the same as in younger people (pegylated interferon, nucleoside or nucleotide agents). It gives identical results with no particular adverse events if the precautions for use are followed. Vaccination is less efficient, as in immunocompromised patients, and needs specific protocols.

Inhibition of alpha interferon (IFN-α)-induced microRNA-122 negatively affects the anti-hepatitis B virus efficiency of IFN-α

Alpha interferon (IFN-α)-based therapy can effectively treat chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, which causes life-threatening complications. Responses to IFN-α therapy vary greatly in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, but underlying mechanisms are almost unknown. In this study, we found that IFN-α treatment induced a marked decrease of microRNA-122 (miR-122) expression in hepatocytes. We next showed that IFN-α-induced miR-122 downregulation was only partly due to transcriptional suppression. One IFN-stimulated gene (ISG), NT5C3, which was identified as a miR-122 target, efficiently inhibited miR-122 by binding and sequestering miR-122 with its mRNA 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR), indicating that this ISG is involved in IFN-α-mediated miR-122 suppression. Notably, the inhibitory effect of IFN-α on miR-122 was completely abolished by blocking IFN-α-induced upregulation of NT5C3 mRNA expression by RNA interference (RNAi). Meanwhile, we observed that miR-122 dramatically inhibited HBV expression and replication. Finally, we showed that IFN-α-mediated HBV-inhibitory effects could be enhanced significantly by blocking IFN-α-induced downregulation of miR-122. We therefore concluded that IFN-α-induced inhibition of miR-122 may negatively affect the anti-HBV function of IFN-α. These data provide valuable insights for a better understanding of the antiviral mechanism of IFN-α and raise further potential interest in enhancing its anti-HBV efficacy.

Viral hepatitis in the elderly

As life expectancy continues to rise, elderly adults represent a rapidly growing proportion of the population. The likelihood of complications of acute and chronic liver disease and overall mortality are higher in elderly populations. Several physiological changes associated with aging, greater prevalence of co-morbid conditions, and cumulative exposure to hepatotropic viruses and environmental hepatotoxins may contribute to worse outcomes of viral hepatitis in the elderly. Although pharmacotherapy for hepatitis B and C continues to evolve, the efficacy, tolerability, and side effects of these agents have not been studied extensively in elderly adults. Immunization against hepatitis A and B in naïve elderly adults is an important public health intervention that needs to be revised and broadened.

Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis evaluating the relative efficacy of nucleos(t)ides for treatment of nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Five nucleoside/nucleotide treatments are now available for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the relative efficacy of adefovir, entecavir, lamivudine, telbivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and nucleos(t)ide combinations in the treatment of CHB.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE and the Cochrane library was conducted to identify all studies evaluating these nucleos(t)ides in adults with CHB. Randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis if they reported the proportion of patients with undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA or hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss/seroconversion at 1 year. Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses were conducted in WinBUGS to assess relative efficacy.

RESULTS

A random-effects meta-analysis of trials on treatment-naive patients with HBeAg-positive CHB demonstrated that 94% of patients will achieve HBV DNA < 300 copies/ml after 1 year with TDF, compared with 73% for entecavir, 50% for adefovir, and 38% for lamivudine. There was a 97.7% probability that TDF enabled a greater proportion of patients to achieve HBV DNA < 300 copies/ml at 1 year than all other treatments considered in the analysis. TDF was significantly superior to all nucleos(t)ides for this outcome at the 0.05 level. There were no statistically significant differences between nucleos(t)ides in HBeAg seroconversion at 1 year, based on a fixed-effects meta-analysis in the same population. More trials on HBeAg-negative and drug-resistant patients are required to facilitate meta-analyses for these subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with HBeAg-positive CHB, TDF is associated with the highest probability of achieving undetectable HBV DNA at 1 year of all nucleos(t)ides considered.

Dynamics of memory T cells during treatment with interferon-alpha in patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

To investigate the association of memory T cell subsets with viral response during treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha).

METHODS

To address this issue, the dynamics of memory T cell subsets was monitored in 57 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during treatment with pegylated IFN-alpha through testing the phenotypes of memory T cells with flowcytometry.

RESULTS

There were clear differences in the phenotypes of these cells during therapy. Memory T cells converted from the major subsets to the minor in the process of treatment with IFN-alpha. Patients who presented a response showed significantly higher percentages of CD8+ T(EM) at 0 and 24 weeks (both P < 0.05), and lower frequency of CD8+ T(CM) than non-responders at 0 and 24 weeks (both P < 0.05). Moreover, the average dosage of IFN-alpha applied to patients with viral response to treatment was 1.43 +/- 0.18 microg/kg, significantly higher than 1.31 +/- 0.25 microg/kg in nonresponders (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity and quality of memory T cell subsets fluctuates during treatment with IFN-alpha. High frequency of T(EM) subsets may be associated with response to treatment with IFN-alpha. A better knowledge of mechanisms underlying the response to therapy may be important for development of new immunotherapeutic strategies to increase CD8 T-cell effectiveness in CHB infection.

Avoiding and managing lamivudine resistance in chronic hepatitis B: current approaches and potential strategies including pegylated interferon

Since its approval for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in 1998, lamivudine (LAM) has been used extensively throughout the world, because of its relatively low costs and favourable tolerability. However, clinical trials and cohort studies have demonstrated that a high rate of resistance to this drug develops and, as a result, it is no longer included as a first-line therapy in most current treatment guidelines. Nevertheless, because of its low cost, this drug continues to be used in many countries and the pool of patients who have developed resistance to LAM continues to increase. Thus, there is a clear need to develop coherent management strategies to treat such patients as well as limit the emergence of resistance in the first instance. The purpose of this review is to highlight the need to aim for long-term treatment success while limiting the emergence of drug resistance and its consequences for the future. In addition to add-on/switch strategies with other nucleos(t)ide analogs, currently available data suggest that interferon-based therapies, with their potential to induce a sustained response, are worthy of consideration not only for reducing de novo resistance but as an option for the management of those patients in whom drug resistance has already developed.

Meta-analyses on viral hepatitis

This article summarizes the meta-analyses of interventions for viral hepatitis A, B, and C. Some of the interventions assessed are described in small trials with unclear bias control. Other interventions are supported by large, high-quality trials. Although attempts have been made to adjust for unclear bias control, analysis of publication bias and other biases is difficult when only few trials are available. It is possible that some of the meta-analyses presented in this article are biased. Furthermore, performing updated cumulative meta-analyses also may introduce random error.3,4 The extent and direction of bias may vary. On average, however, bias leads to overestimated intervention benefits.1 Accordingly, the benefit of some of the interventions suggested in this article may be exaggerated by systematic and random errors. Additional research including large, randomized trials is necessary to clarify the true intervention effects.

Pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of lamivudine in hepatitis B virus infection

Lamivudine was the first nucleoside analog for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It is well-tolerated and induces a decrease in serum HBV DNA levels associated with normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. However, a sustained response with hepatitis B 'e' antigen to anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion is obtained in a smaller proportion of patients and hepatitis B surface antigen loss is exceptional. The response is maintained during therapy, and needs to be continued indefinitely in the majority of patients since withdrawal of treatment is generally followed by a rapid reappearance of the virus. However, mutations can be induced in long-term treatment.

Systematic review: combination therapies for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

There is a renewed interest in use of combination therapies in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) because of limitations of monotherapies.

AIM

To discuss the current status of combination therapies in treatment-naïve CHB.

METHODS

PubMed search was done using 'combination', 'sequential' and 'chronic hepatitis B' as the search terms.

RESULTS

The two most popular combination therapies include 'combination of nucleos(t)ide analogues' and 'combination of interferons and nucleos(t)ide analogues'. Combination therapies using two nucleos(t)ide analogues do not lead to higher long-term efficacy. However, addition of a nucleos(t)ide analogue with a good resistance profile to a nucleos(t)ide analogue with a lower genetic barrier to resistance decreases the risk of emergent resistance to the latter. Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates are observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional interferon, but pegylated-interferon monotherapy is equally effective as combination with lamivudine. Again, resistance to lamivudine is lower with its combination with interferons.

CONCLUSIONS

The answer to the question whether hepatitis B can be treated better with combination or monotherapy remains largely unknown. Additional trials are warranted of combination therapies of peginterferon and potent nucleos(t)ide analogues or therapies with the combined use of nucleos(t)ide analogues or immunomodulators.