1
|
Kember AJ, Anderson JL, House SC, Reuter DG, Goergen CJ, Hobson SR. Impact of maternal posture on fetal physiology in human pregnancy: a narrative review. Front Physiol 2024; 15:1394707. [PMID: 38827993 PMCID: PMC11140392 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1394707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
In numerous medical conditions, including pregnancy, gravity and posture interact to impact physiology and pathophysiology. Recent investigations, for example, pertaining to maternal sleeping posture during the third trimester and possible impact on fetal growth and stillbirth risk highlight the importance and potential clinical implications of the subject. In this review, we provide an extensive discussion of the impact of maternal posture on fetal physiology from conception to the postpartum period in human pregnancy. We conducted a systematic literature search of the MEDLINE database and identified 242 studies from 1991 through 2021, inclusive, that met our inclusion criteria. Herein, we provide a synthesis of the resulting literature. In the first section of the review, we group the results by the impact of maternal posture at rest on the cervix, uterus, placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic fluid, and fetus. In the second section of the review, we address the impact on fetal-related outcomes of maternal posture during various maternal activities (e.g., sleep, work, exercise), medical procedures (e.g., fertility, imaging, surgery), and labor and birth. We present the published literature, highlight gaps and discrepancies, and suggest future research opportunities and clinical practice changes. In sum, we anticipate that this review will shed light on the impact of maternal posture on fetal physiology in a manner that lends utility to researchers and clinicians who are working to improve maternal, fetal, and child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan J. Kember
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Shiphrah Biomedical Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer L. Anderson
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Sarah C. House
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David G. Reuter
- Cardiac Innovations, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Craig J. Goergen
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Sebastian R. Hobson
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effect of upright and ambulant positions versus lying down during the active first stage of labor on birth outcomes among nulliparous women: randomized controlled clinical trial. FRONTIERS OF NURSING 2020. [DOI: 10.2478/fon-2020-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To examine the effect of upright and ambulant positions versus lying down during the active first stage of labor on birth outcomes for nulliparous women.
Methods
This is a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the delivery department of Damanhour Educational Institute, El Behira Governorate, Egypt. The study sample involved 150 parturient women equally divided into intervention and control groups using randomization block technique. The researchers used four tools for data collection: Demographic data interview schedule, World Health Organization Partograph, Apgar's score, to evaluate neonatal outcomes, and visual analogue pain intensity scale. For the study group, the parturient women were encouraged to assume one of the upright positions or ambulating around the bed so as to maintain the pelvis in vertical plane as far as possible for 20–25 min for every 1 h. The control group received routine hospital care, which includes lying down in bed. IBM SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data.
Results
Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the study and control groups in relation to cervical dilation, fetal head descent, uterine contractions interval, and frequency. The duration of the first stage of labor significantly reduced (P = 0.018) in the intervention group compared with control group. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between both groups in term of emergency cesarean birth rates, oxytocin use, and neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions
This study proves that upright and ambulant positions significantly enhance uterine contractility, cervical dilatation, and fetal head descent and reduce the first stage duration.
Collapse
|
3
|
Alhafez L, Berghella V. Evidence-based labor management: first stage of labor (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2:100185. [PMID: 33345911 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
There are several interventions during the first stage of labor that have been studied. Vaginal disinfection with chlorhexidine cannot be recommended. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for group B streptococcus-positive women. Antibiotic therapy can be considered in women with term prelabor rupture of membranes whose latency is expected to be >12 hours. Aromatherapy with essential oils through inhalation or back massage can be considered. Immersion in water can be considered. Oral restriction of fluid or solid food is not recommended. In the setting of oral restriction, intravenous fluid containing dextrose at a rate of 250 mL/h is recommended. Upright positions and ambulation are recommended in women without regional anesthesia, and women with regional anesthesia can adopt whatever position they find most comfortable and choose to ambulate or not ambulate. Continuous bladder catheterization cannot be recommended. There is no recommended frequency of cervical examinations or sweeping of membranes. The use of a partogram cannot be recommended as a routine intervention. Routine use of the peanut ball cannot be recommended. Antispasmodic agents cannot be recommended. Routine amniotomy alone in normally progressing spontaneous first stage of labor cannot be recommended. Oxytocin augmentation is recommended to shorten the time to delivery for women making slow progress in spontaneous labor, and higher doses of oxytocin can be considered. Early intervention with oxytocin and amniotomy for the prevention and treatment of dysfunctional or slow labor is recommended. Routine use of intrauterine pressure catheter and ultrasound cannot be recommended. Cesarean delivery for arrest should not be performed unless labor has arrested for a minimum of 4 hours with adequate uterine activity or 6 hours with inadequate uterine activity in a woman with rupture of membranes, adequate oxytocin, and ≥6 cm cervical dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leen Alhafez
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vincenzo Berghella
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bick D, Briley A, Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Lynch L, MacArthur C, Moore P, Nolan M, Rivero-Arias O, Sanders J, Shennan A, Wilson M. A multicentre, randomised controlled trial of position during the late stages of labour in nulliparous women with an epidural: clinical effectiveness and an economic evaluation (BUMPES). Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-176. [PMID: 29110753 DOI: 10.3310/hta21650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidural analgesia leads to increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD). There is debate about whether or not posture in second-stage labour influences the incidence of spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB). OBJECTIVES In nulliparous women with epidural analgesia, does a policy of adopting an 'upright position' throughout second-stage labour increase the incidence of SVB compared with a policy of adopting a 'lying-down' position? DESIGN Two-arm randomised controlled trial. SETTING Maternity units in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS Nulliparous women aged ≥ 16 years, at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation with singleton cephalic presentation and intended SVB, in second-stage labour with an epidural providing effective pain relief. INTERVENTIONS (1) Upright position to maintain the pelvis in as vertical a plane as possible; and (2) lying-down position to maintain the pelvis in as horizontal a plane as possible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was incidence of SVB. Secondary outcomes included augmentation, interventions to maintain blood pressure, duration of labour, episiotomy, genital tract trauma, post-partum haemorrhage, maternal satisfaction, neonatal metabolic acidosis, 5-minute Apgar score of < 4, resuscitation at birth and admission to neonatal unit. At 1 year for (1) women: urinary or faecal incontinence, dyspareunia and health-related quality of life; (2) for infants: major morbidity. A cost-consequences analysis with a time horizon of 1 year after the birth from a NHS perspective. RESULTS Between October 2010 and January 2014, 3236 women were randomised from 41 centres in England and Wales. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of SVB between groups, with 35.2% of women achieving a SVB in the upright group, compared with 41.1% in the lying-down group (adjusted risk ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.94). There was no evidence of differences in most of the secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes, or in long-term outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. No significant overall cost differences were observed between upright and lying-down positions for mothers or their babies. LIMITATIONS Measurement of adherence was challenging in this unmasked trial, and adherence could be influenced by midwives' beliefs about the allocated positions. If adherence was poor, this would have diluted the difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS There is clear evidence of the benefit of adopting a lying-down position in second-stage labour in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia, with no apparent disadvantages in either short- or long-term outcomes for mother or baby, and this is cost neutral for the NHS. FUTURE WORK Questions remain about whether or not other positions could increase the incidence of SVB further in this group of women. The results also raise questions about the role of maternal position in second-stage labour in women without an epidural. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35706297. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in Health Technology Assessment, Vol 21, No. 65. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Bick
- Department of Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Annette Briley
- Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter Brocklehurst
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pollyanna Hardy
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edmund Juszczak
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lynn Lynch
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christine MacArthur
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Phillip Moore
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mary Nolan
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | | | - Julia Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Division of Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matt Wilson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taavoni S, Abdolahian S, Haghani H, Neysani L. Effect of Birth Ball Usage on Pain in the Active Phase of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011; 56:137-40. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00013.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
6
|
Ranasinghe JS, Birnbach DJ. Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks. Int J Womens Health 2010; 1:31-43. [PMID: 21072273 PMCID: PMC2971703 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s4552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuraxial analgesia is widely accepted as the most effective and the least depressant method of providing pain relief in labor. Over the last several decades neuraxial labor analgesia techniques and medications have progressed to the point now where they provide high quality pain relief with minimal side effects to both the mother and the fetus while maximizing the maternal autonomy possible for the parturient receiving neuraxial analgesia. The introduction of the combined spinal epidural technique for labor has allowed for the rapid onset of analgesia with minimal motor blockade, therefore allowing the comfortable parturient to ambulate. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia techniques have evolved to allow for more flexible analgesia that is tailored to the individual needs of the parturient and effective throughout the different phases of labor. Computer integrated systems have been studied to provide seamless analgesia from induction of neuraxial block to delivery. New adjuvant drugs that improve the effectiveness of neuraxial labor analgesia while decreasing the side effects that may occur due to high dose of a single drug are likely to be added to future labor analgesia practice. Bupivacaine still remains a popular choice of local anesthetic for labor analgesia. New local anesthetics with less cardiotoxicity have been introduced, but their cost effectiveness in the current labor analgesia practice has been questioned.
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Kruger L, Schoombee C. The other side of caring: abuse in a South African maternity ward. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/02646830903294979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Viswanathan M. Tailoring systematic reviews to meet critical priorities in maternal health in the intrapartum period. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22 Suppl 1:10-7. [PMID: 18237347 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00907.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Health care practitioners and researchers commonly call for greater reliance on evidence as a means to achieve improvement in quality of care. Systematic reviews provide a means to accelerate the use of evidence-based clinical interventions and public health practices. The extent to which these time- and resource-intensive systematic reviews currently address critical maternal health priorities in the intrapartum period is unclear. This analysis summarises key maternal health and research priorities, maps these priorities to existing reviews, identifies gaps in the literature that can be addressed with systematic reviews, and highlights key methodological concerns in conducting systematic reviews. The analysis draws on published data on maternal morbidities and an overview of 108 systematic reviews in Medline in the past 5 years using the MeSH terms 'Delivery, Obstetric,' to draw the links between health priorities, research priorities, existing evidence and missing evidence. Key causes of morbidity during labour and delivery in the United States include haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, obstetric trauma and infection. Analyses of maternal morbidity and mortality suggest that key concerns include racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes and the prevention of adverse events. Systematic reviews, however, generally tend to focus on the reduction of harms associated with interventions, are frequently limited to randomised designs, and do not address issues of health disparities. The results suggest that advances in evidence-based care in maternal health require that systematic reviews address issues of prevention of adverse events, include a larger variety of study designs when necessary and pay closer attention to health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera Viswanathan
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ley L, Ikhouane M, Staiti G, Benhamou D. Complication neurologique après posture obstétricale «en tailleur» lors d'un travail sous analgésie péridurale. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 36:496-9. [PMID: 17482772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2006] [Revised: 10/04/2006] [Accepted: 03/20/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Obstetrical positioning is used more and more often because of the supposed or proven benefits although side effects are not well known. We therefore report the case of a patient who presented with a postpartum neurological deficit after a seven hour hip-flexed posture during labour under epidural analgesia. The parturient did not complain of pain or discomfort during labour. The neurological injury was suspected because of delayed recovery of epidural analgesia induced-motor block. Neurological examination disclosed sensory and motor abnormalities in the left femoral and sciatic nerve distribution areas. The early performed lumbar CT scan did not show any complication and electromyographic evaluation performed on the ninth postpartum day was normal. Three months after delivery, some degree of neuropathic pain in the sciatic nerve distribution remained. The risk of neurological injury directly related to obstetrical positioning is discussed. Prolonged positioning using a posture which can induce nerve stretching should be avoided. This is especially true when the patient is receiving epidural analgesia which can mask pain or discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ley
- Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, APHP, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 92141 Clamart cedex, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ley L, Ikhouane M, Staiti G, Benhamou D. Complication neurologique après posture obstétricale «en tailleur» lors d'un travail sous analgésie péridurale. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 26:666-9. [PMID: 17574376 DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2006] [Accepted: 04/03/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Obstetrical positioning is used more and more often because of the supposed or proven benefits although side effects are not well known. We therefore report the case of a patient who presented with a postpartum neurological deficit after a seven hour hip-flexed posture during labour under epidural analgesia. The parturient did not complain of pain or discomfort during labour. The neurological injury was suspected because of delayed recovery of epidural analgesia-induced motor block. Neurological examination disclosed sensory and motor abnormalities in the left femoral and sciatic nerve distribution areas. The early performed lumbar CT-scan did not show any complication and electromyographic evaluation performed on the ninth postpartum day was normal. Three months after delivery, some degree of neuropathic pain in the sciatic nerve distribution remained. The risk of neurological injury directly related to obstetrical positioning is discussed. Prolonged positioning using a posture which can induce nerve stretching should be avoided. This is especially true when the patient is receiving epidural analgesia which can mask pain or discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ley
- Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, APHP, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart cedex, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bibliography. Current world literature. Women's health. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18:666-74. [PMID: 17099340 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e328011ef42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Roberts CL, Algert CS, Cameron CA, Torvaldsen S. A meta-analysis of upright positions in the second stage to reduce instrumental deliveries in women with epidural analgesia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84:794-8. [PMID: 16026407 DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00786.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidural analgesia is associated with an increased risk of instrumental delivery. We, in this study, present a systematic review in order to assess the effectiveness of maintaining an upright position during the second stage of labor to reduce instrumental deliveries among women choosing epidural analgesia. The study population included women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term with epidural analgesia established in the first stage of labor. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and the Cochrane Trials Register up to July 2003 and cross-checked the reference lists of published studies. Trial eligibility and outcomes were pre-specified. Group tabular data were obtained for each trial and were analyzed by using meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS Only two studies were included with data on 281 women (166 upright and 115 recumbent). Upright positions in the second stage were associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of both instrumental delivery (relative risk (RR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46-1.28) and cesarean section (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.28-1.16). Both studies reported a statistically significant reduction in labor duration associated with upright positions. Data on other outcomes, including perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal satisfaction, and infant well-being, were insufficient. CONCLUSIONS There were insufficient data to show a significant benefit from upright positions in the second stage of labor for women who choose epidural or to evaluate safety aspects. However the magnitude of the reductions in instrumental delivery and cesarean section warrants an adequately powered randomized, controlled trial to fully evaluate the practice of upright positions in the second stage for women with an epidural.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine L Roberts
- Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, Building D02, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|