1
|
Douma LG, Crislip GR, Cheng KY, Barral D, Masten S, Holzworth M, Roig E, Glasford K, Beguiristain K, Li W, Bratanatawira P, Lynch IJ, Cain BD, Wingo CS, Gumz ML. Knockout of the circadian clock protein PER1 results in sex-dependent alterations of ET-1 production in mice in response to a high-salt diet plus mineralocorticoid treatment. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2020; 98:579-586. [PMID: 32437627 DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Previously, we showed that global knockout (KO) of the circadian clock transcription factor PER1 in male, but not female, mice fed a high-salt diet plus mineralocorticoid treatment (HS/DOCP) resulted in nondipping hypertension and decreased night/day ratio of sodium (Na) excretion. Additionally, we have shown that the endothelin-1 (ET-1) gene is targeted by both PER1 and aldosterone. We hypothesized that ET-1 would exhibit a sex-specific response to HS/DOCP treatment in PER1 KO. Here we show that male, but not female, global PER1 KO mice exhibit a decreased night/day ratio of urinary ET-1. Gene expression analysis revealed significant genotype differences in ET-1 and endothelin A receptor (ETA) expression in male, but not female, mice in response to HS/DOCP. Additionally, both wild-type and global PER1 KO male mice significantly increase endothelin B receptor (ETB) expression in response to HS/DOCP, but female mice do not. Finally, siRNA-mediated knockdown of PER1 in mouse cortical collecting duct cells (mpkCCDc14) resulted in increased ET-1 mRNA expression and peptide secretion in response to aldosterone treatment. These data suggest that PER1 is a negative regulator of ET-1 expression in response to HS/DOCP, revealing a novel mechanism for the regulation of renal Na handling in response to HS/DOCP treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren G Douma
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - G Ryan Crislip
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Kit-Yan Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Dominique Barral
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Sarah Masten
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Meaghan Holzworth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Emilio Roig
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Krystal Glasford
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Kevin Beguiristain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Wendy Li
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Phillip Bratanatawira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - I Jeanette Lynch
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.,North Florida/South Georgia Malcolm Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Brian D Cain
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Charles S Wingo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.,North Florida/South Georgia Malcolm Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Michelle L Gumz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.,North Florida/South Georgia Malcolm Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Becker BK, Feagans AC, Chen D, Kasztan M, Jin C, Speed JS, Pollock JS, Pollock DM. Renal denervation attenuates hypertension but not salt sensitivity in ET B receptor-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2017; 313:R425-R437. [PMID: 28701323 DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00174.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hypertension is a prevalent pathology that increases risk for numerous cardiovascular diseases. Because the etiology of hypertension varies across patients, specific and effective therapeutic approaches are needed. The role of renal sympathetic nerves is established in numerous forms of hypertension, but their contribution to salt sensitivity and interaction with factors such as endothelin-1 are poorly understood. Rats deficient of functional ETB receptors (ETB-def) on all tissues except sympathetic nerves are hypertensive and exhibit salt-sensitive increases in blood pressure. We hypothesized that renal sympathetic nerves contribute to hypertension and salt sensitivity in ETB-def rats. The hypothesis was tested through bilateral renal sympathetic nerve denervation and measuring blood pressure during normal salt (0.49% NaCl) and high-salt (4.0% NaCl) diets. Denervation reduced mean arterial pressure in ETB-def rats compared with sham-operated controls by 12 ± 3 (SE) mmHg; however, denervation did not affect the increase in blood pressure after 2 wk of high-salt diet (+19 ± 3 vs. +16 ± 3 mmHg relative to normal salt diet; denervated vs. sham, respectively). Denervation reduced cardiac sympathetic-to-parasympathetic tone [low frequency-high frequency (LF/HF)] during normal salt diet and vasomotor LF/HF tone during high-salt diet in ETB-def rats. We conclude that the renal sympathetic nerves contribute to the hypertension but not to salt sensitivity of ETB-def rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan K Becker
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Amanda C Feagans
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daian Chen
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Malgorzata Kasztan
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Chunhua Jin
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Joshua S Speed
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jennifer S Pollock
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - David M Pollock
- Cardio-Renal Physiology and Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qingyan Z, Xuejun J, Yanhong T, Zixuan D, Xiaozhan W, Xule W, Zongwen G, Wei H, Shengbo Y, Congxin H. Efectos beneficiosos de la simpatectomía renal sobre el remodelado vascular pulmonar en la hipertensión arterial primaria experimental. Rev Esp Cardiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2014.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
4
|
Beneficial Effects of Renal Denervation on Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling in Experimental Pulmonary Artery Hypertension. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 68:562-70. [PMID: 25804321 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Activation of both the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is closely associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We hypothesized that renal denervation decreases renin-angiotensin-aldosterone activity and inhibits the progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS Twenty-two beagles were randomized into 3 groups. The dogs' pulmonary dynamics were measured before and 8 weeks after injection of 0.1mL/kg dimethylformamide (control dogs) or 2mg/kg dehydromonocrotaline (pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension + renal denervation dogs). Eight weeks after injection, neurohormone levels and pulmonary tissue morphology were measured. RESULTS Levels of plasma angiotensin II and endothelin-1 were significantly increased after 8 weeks in the pulmonary arterial hypertension dogs and were higher in the lung tissues of these dogs than in those of the control and renal denervation dogs (mean [standard deviation] angiotensin II: 65 [9.8] vs 38 [6.7], 46 [8.1]; endothelin-1: 96 [10.3] vs 54 [6.2], 67 [9.4]; P < .01). Dehydromonocrotaline increased the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (16 [3.4] mmHg vs 33 [7.3] mmHg; P < .01), and renal denervation prevented this increase. Pulmonary smooth muscle cell proliferation was higher in the pulmonary arterial hypertension dogs than in the control and pulmonary arterial hypertension + renal denervation dogs. CONCLUSIONS Renal denervation attenuates pulmonary vascular remodeling and decreases pulmonary arterial pressure in experimental pulmonary arterial hypertension. The effect of renal denervation may contribute to decreased neurohormone levels.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kohan DE. Role of collecting duct endothelin in control of renal function and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2013; 305:R659-68. [PMID: 23986358 DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00345.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Over 26,000 manuscripts have been published dealing with endothelins since their discovery 25 years ago. These peptides, and particularly endothelin-1 (ET-1), are expressed by, bind to, and act on virtually every cell type in the body, influencing multiple biological functions. Among these actions, the effects of ET-1 on arterial pressure and volume homeostasis have been most extensively studied. While ET-1 modulates arterial pressure through regulation of multiple organ systems, the peptide's actions in the kidney in general, and the collecting duct in particular, are of unique importance. The collecting duct produces large amounts of ET-1 that bind in an autocrine manner to endothelin A and B receptors, causing inhibition of Na(+) and water reabsorption; absence of collecting duct ET-1 or its receptors is associated with marked salt-sensitive hypertension. Collecting duct ET-1 production is stimulated by Na(+) and water loading through local mechanisms that include sensing of salt and other solute delivery as well as shear stress. Thus the collecting duct ET-1 system exists, at least in part, to detect alterations in, and maintain homeostasis for, extracellular fluid volume. Derangements in collecting duct ET-1 production may contribute to the pathogenesis of genetic hypertension. Blockade of endothelin receptors causes fluid retention due, in large part, to inhibition of the action of ET-1 in the collecting duct; this side effect has substantially limited the clinical utility of this class of drugs. Herein, the biology of the collecting duct ET-1 system is reviewed, with particular emphasis on key issues and questions that need addressing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Kohan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Since its discovery in 1988 as an endothelial cell-derived peptide that exerts the most potent vasoconstriction of any known endogenous compound, endothelin (ET) has emerged as an important regulator of renal physiology and pathophysiology. This review focuses on how the ET system impacts renal function in health; it is apparent that ET regulates multiple aspects of kidney function. These include modulation of glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow, control of renin release, and regulation of transport of sodium, water, protons, and bicarbonate. These effects are exerted through ET interactions with almost every cell type in the kidney, including mesangial cells, podocytes, endothelium, vascular smooth muscle, every section of the nephron, and renal nerves. In addition, while not the subject of the current review, ET can also indirectly affect renal function through modulation of extrarenal systems, including the vasculature, nervous system, adrenal gland, circulating hormones, and the heart. As will become apparent, these pleiotropic effects of ET are of fundamental physiologic importance in the control of renal function in health. In addition, to help put these effects into perspective, we will also discuss, albeit to a relatively limited extent, how alterations in the ET system can contribute to hypertension and kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Kohan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kohan DE, Rossi NF, Inscho EW, Pollock DM. Regulation of blood pressure and salt homeostasis by endothelin. Physiol Rev 2011; 91:1-77. [PMID: 21248162 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00060.2009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Endothelin (ET) peptides and their receptors are intimately involved in the physiological control of systemic blood pressure and body Na homeostasis, exerting these effects through alterations in a host of circulating and local factors. Hormonal systems affected by ET include natriuretic peptides, aldosterone, catecholamines, and angiotensin. ET also directly regulates cardiac output, central and peripheral nervous system activity, renal Na and water excretion, systemic vascular resistance, and venous capacitance. ET regulation of these systems is often complex, sometimes involving opposing actions depending on which receptor isoform is activated, which cells are affected, and what other prevailing factors exist. A detailed understanding of this system is important; disordered regulation of the ET system is strongly associated with hypertension and dysregulated extracellular fluid volume homeostasis. In addition, ET receptor antagonists are being increasingly used for the treatment of a variety of diseases; while demonstrating benefit, these agents also have adverse effects on fluid retention that may substantially limit their clinical utility. This review provides a detailed analysis of how the ET system is involved in the control of blood pressure and Na homeostasis, focusing primarily on physiological regulation with some discussion of the role of the ET system in hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Kohan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Endothelin receptor blockade does not affect blood pressure or angiotensin II levels in CYP1A1-Ren-2 transgenic rats with acutely induced hypertension. Vascul Pharmacol 2009; 50:194-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2009.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2008] [Revised: 12/08/2008] [Accepted: 01/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
9
|
Navar LG, Arendshorst WJ, Pallone TL, Inscho EW, Imig JD, Bell PD. The Renal Microcirculation. Compr Physiol 2008. [DOI: 10.1002/cphy.cp020413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
10
|
Abstract
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) exerts a wide range of biologic effects that can influence systemic blood pressure. Recent studies indicate that increased activity of the ET system in the vasculature, with resultant activation of primarily ET A receptors, can contribute to hypertension. In contrast, decreased production of ET-1 in the renal medulla, and reduced activation of collecting duct ET B receptors, can also elevate systemic blood pressure. Both ET A and combined A/B receptor blockers reduce blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Several important questions remain with respect to the ET system in hypertension, including how ET receptor antagonists will interact with other antihypertensive agents, which receptor subtypes should be targeted, and what the effect of ET blockade will be on hypertension-related end-organ damage as opposed to blood pressure alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Kohan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 1900 East 30 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Navar LG, Arendshorst WJ, Pallone TL, Inscho EW, Imig JD, Bell PD. The Renal Microcirculation. Microcirculation 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374530-9.00015-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
|
12
|
Schneider MP, Boesen EI, Pollock DM. Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2007. [PMID: 17002597 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105134.contrasting] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus P Schneider
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schneider MP, Boesen EI, Pollock DM. Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2007; 47:731-59. [PMID: 17002597 PMCID: PMC2825895 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus P Schneider
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boesen EI, Anderson WP, Evans RG, Kett MM. Endogenous endothelins and the response to electrical renal nerve stimulation in anaesthetized rabbits. Auton Neurosci 2007; 132:8-15. [PMID: 16978927 DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2006] [Revised: 07/25/2006] [Accepted: 08/07/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The influence of endogenous endothelins on the neural control of renal function is poorly understood. We therefore studied the effects of endothelin blockade (combined ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism using TAK-044) on the acute and prolonged effects of renal nerve stimulation in rabbits, measuring renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine flow and sodium excretion. Brief (3 min) stimulation over 0.5-8 Hz produced frequency-dependent reductions in total renal blood flow, cortical blood flow and, less markedly, medullary blood flow. TAK-044 did not significantly alter basal total renal blood flow or cortical blood flow, or their responses to nerve stimulation, but significantly increased basal medullary blood flow (P<0.01) and increased the slope of the stimulation frequency-medullary blood flow relationship (P<0.05). Prolonged (20 min) stimulation at 0, 0.5 and 2 Hz produced frequency-dependent reductions in total renal blood flow, GFR, urine flow and sodium excretion, but not medullary blood flow. Pretreatment with TAK-044 did not significantly alter these responses. Thus, endogenous endothelins do not appear to either augment or lessen the effects of renal nerve activation on total renal blood flow, cortical blood flow, GFR or sodium excretion. The apparent ability of TAK-044 to enhance medullary blood flow responses to renal nerve stimulation may reflect an action of endogenous endothelins to blunt neurally mediated vasoconstriction in the medullary circulation. Alternatively, it may simply be secondary to the effects of endogenous endothelins on basal medullary blood flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika I Boesen
- Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Girchev RA, Bäcker A, Markova PP, Kramer HJ. Interaction of Endothelin with Renal Nerves Modulates Kidney Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Kidney Blood Press Res 2006; 29:126-34. [PMID: 16864980 DOI: 10.1159/000094571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2006] [Accepted: 06/08/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS We investigated kidney function, renal endothelin-1 concentration, prepro-endothelin-1 mRNA as well as endothelin receptor A and B mRNA expression and receptor properties in normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with intact renal nerves and 7 days after renal denervation. In addition, responses of renal function to the non-selective ETA/ETB receptor blocker bosentan (10 mg/kg i.v. bolus injection) were studied. RESULTS In SHR, renal papillary prepro-endothelin-1 mRNA expression, endothelin-1 tissue concentrations and endothelin receptor density were significantly lower than in normotensive rats. Renal denervation was associated with a decrease in papillary tissue prepro-endothelin-1 mRNA and in WKY rats also with a significant reduction in papillary endothelin-1 content without affecting ET receptor density. Bosentan did not alter renal blood flow or glomerular filtration rate but decreased urine flow rate in both intact normotensive and hypertensive rats, whereas it decreased urine sodium and potassium excretion only in intact WKY. Bosentan had no effects on renal function in renal denervated rats. CONCLUSION Since renal papillary endothelin-1 appears to counteract the fluid and sodium retaining effects of renal nerve activity, an impaired renal endothelin-1 synthesis in SHR may contribute to excessive sodium retention and thus to the pathogenesis of hypertension in SHR.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kohan DE. The renal medullary endothelin system in control of sodium and water excretion and systemic blood pressure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2006; 15:34-40. [PMID: 16340664 DOI: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000186852.15889.1a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endothelin-1 is a multifunctional peptide that is produced by the kidney and may regulate a variety of renal functions. This review discusses recent developments in understanding the role of the medullary endothelin-1 system in regulating renal salt and water excretion and systemic blood pressure. RECENT FINDINGS The renal medulla is the major site of endothelin-1 synthesis and receptor expression in the kidney. Endothelin-1 in vitro can inhibit sodium or water transport in the collecting duct and thick ascending limb through autocrine pathways. Endothelin-1 also can increase medullary blood flow. These effects of endothelin-1 are partially mediated by nitric oxide and cyclooxygenase metabolites which are produced by most medullary cells. Mice with collecting duct-specific knockout of the endothelin-1 gene have impaired sodium excretion in response to sodium loading and have hypertension which worsens with high salt intake. The mice also have heightened sensitivity to vasopressin and decreased ability to excrete an acute water load. Mice with collecting duct-specific endothelin A receptor knockout have normal blood pressure and sodium excretion, but have reduced vasopressin responsiveness. Medullary endothelin-1 content is reduced in many forms of experimental hypertension. SUMMARY Medullary endothelin-1 regulates renal sodium and water transport and medullary blood flow. In particular, the medullary collecting duct is important in this process, but the medullary endothelin system involves complex interactions, through autocrine and paracrine pathways, between most cell types in the region. Medullary endothelin-1 is fundamentally important in physiologic regulation of renal sodium and water excretion and maintenance of normal systemic blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Kohan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 1900 East 30 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Girchev R, Bäcker A, Markova P, Kramer HJ. Renal endothelin system and excretory function in Wistar-Kyoto and Long-Evans rats. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2006; 186:67-76. [PMID: 16497181 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2005.01501.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM The role of the kidney endothelin system in the renal regulation of fluid and electrolyte excretion was investigated in Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Long-Evans (LE) rats in which we found previously marked differences in the renal excretory responses to endothelin A receptor blockade. METHODS The selective endothelin A and B receptor antagonists BQ-123 (16.4 nmol kg(-1) min(-1)) and BQ-788 (25 nmol kg(-1) min(-1)) were infused i.v. for 50 min in conscious chronically instrumented WKY and LE rats and their renal function and renal endothelin system were studied. RESULTS Without effects on glomerular filtration rate or renal blood flow, BQ-123 and BQ-788 decreased by more than 50% (P < 0.01) both urine flow rate and electrolyte excretion in WKY rats but only urine flow rate (P < 0.05) in LE rats. Endothelin-1 content, preproET-1/GPDH mRNA ratio, B(max) and K(d) of total endothelin receptors in renal cortex did not differ between the two strains. In contrast, plasma endothelin-1 concentration (0.58 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.01 femtomol mL(-1); P < 0.01), renal papillary ET-1 concentration (68 +/- 5 vs. 478 +/- 62 fmol mg(-1) protein; P < 0.01) and preproET-1/GPDH mRNA ratio (0.65 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.88 +/- 0.05; P < 0.05) as well as total endothelin receptor number in renal papilla (B(max) 5.3 +/- 0.4 vs. and 9.0 +/- 1.2 pmol mg(-1) protein; P < 0.05) were markedly lower in LE than in WKY rats. In vitro studies showed that in both strains ET(B) receptors on renal cortical membranes amounted between 65% and 67% and on papillary membranes between 85% and 88%. CONCLUSION The present data show that the selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor blockade differentially affects tubular water and salt handling, which becomes apparent in conditions of low renal papillary endothelin receptor number and tissue endothelin-1 concentration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Girchev
- Department of Physiology, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|