1
|
Khaddour K, Murakami N, Ruiz ES, Silk AW. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Solid-Organ-Transplant-Associated Immunosuppression. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3083. [PMID: 39272941 PMCID: PMC11394667 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immunotherapy. Yet, successful treatment with immunotherapy relies on an adequate antitumor immune response. Patients who are solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a higher incidence of CSCC compared to the general population. This review discusses the current knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of patients with CSCC who are immunocompromised because of their chronic exposure to immunosuppressive medications to prevent allograft rejection. First, we discuss the prognostic impact of immunosuppression in patients with CSCC. Next, we review the risk of CSCC development in immunosuppressed patients due to SOT. In addition, we provide an overview of the biological immune disruption present in transplanted immunosuppressed CSCC patients. We discuss the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy and provide a framework for the management approach with SOTRs with CSCC. Finally, we discuss potential novel approaches that are being investigated for the management of immunosuppressed patients with CSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karam Khaddour
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Center for Cutaneous Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Naoka Murakami
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Emily S Ruiz
- Center for Cutaneous Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ann W Silk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Center for Cutaneous Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akhtar K, Sravanthi MV, D’Angelo J, Sivapiragasam A. Cemiplimab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series of 3 Unique Scenarios. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2022; 10:23247096221121408. [PMID: 36017984 PMCID: PMC9421057 DOI: 10.1177/23247096221121408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cemiplimab, a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), has shown promising results in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). In a nonrandomized trial where cemiplimab 3 mg/kg was given every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks, a 44% response rate was noted. This case series discusses 3 unique scenarios of patients with advanced cSCC treated with cemiplimab. The first case is of an end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient with failed living donor kidney transplant who had developed recurrent cSCC despite several excisions and topical 5-flurouracil and acitretin therapy. He received 8 cycles of cemiplimab leading to resolution. This case serves as an example of the safety and efficacy of cemiplimab in a complex patient who is a kidney transplant recipient on hemodialysis. The second case describes an elderly gentleman with inoperable cSCC initially treated with radiotherapy who later received 9 cycles of cemiplimab for recurrent metastatic disease with excellent response. This case supports the safe and effective use of cemiplimab in an elderly patient. In the third case, cSCC presented itself as a large fungating mass that would have otherwise necessitated limb amputation and was successfully treated with 18 cycles of cemiplimab. This case highlights the dramatic response to cemiplimab obviating the need for surgical intervention and resulting in limb salvage.
Collapse
|
3
|
Massey PR, Schmults CD, Li SJ, Arron ST, Asgari MM, Bavinck JNB, Billingsley E, Blalock TW, Blasdale K, Carroll BT, Carucci JA, Chong AH, Christensen SR, Chung CL, DeSimone JA, Ducroux E, Escutia-Muñoz B, Ferrándiz-Pulido C, Fox MC, Genders RE, Geusau A, Gjersvik P, Hanlon AM, Harken EBO, Hofbauer GF, Hopkins RS, Leitenberger JJ, Loss MJ, Del Marmol V, Mascaró JM, Myers SA, Nguyen BT, Oliveira WRP, Otley CC, Proby CM, Rácz E, Ruiz-Salas V, Samie FH, Seçkin D, Shah SN, Shin TM, Shumack SP, Soon SL, Stasko T, Zavattaro E, Zeitouni NC, Zwald FO, Harwood CA, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Prevention of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Consensus Statement. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:1219-1226. [PMID: 34468690 PMCID: PMC9937447 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is a paucity of evidence to guide physicians regarding prevention strategies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). OBJECTIVE To examine the development and results of a Delphi process initiated to identify consensus-based medical management recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. EVIDENCE REVIEW Dermatologists with more than 5 years' experience treating SOTRs were invited to participate. A novel actinic damage and skin cancer index (AD-SCI), consisting of 6 ordinal stages corresponding to an increasing burden of actinic damage and CSCC, was used to guide survey design. Three sequential web-based surveys were administered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Pursuant to Delphi principles, respondents thoroughly reviewed all peer responses between rounds. Supplemental questions were also asked to better understand panelists' rationale for their responses. FINDINGS The Delphi panel comprised 48 dermatologists. Respondents represented 13 countries, with 27 (56%) from the US. Twenty-nine respondents (60%) were Mohs surgeons. Consensus was reached with 80% or higher concordance among respondents when presented with a statement, question, or management strategy pertaining to prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. A near-consensus category of 70% to less than 80% concordance was also defined. The AD-SCI stage-based recommendations were established if consensus or near-consensus was achieved. The panel was able to make recommendations for 5 of 6 AD-SCI stages. Key recommendations include the following: cryotherapy for scattered actinic keratosis (AK); field therapy for AK when grouped in 1 anatomical area, unless AKs are thick in which case field therapy and cryotherapy were recommended; combination lesion directed and field therapy with fluorouracil for field cancerized skin; and initiation of acitretin therapy and discussion of immunosuppression reduction or modification for patients who develop multiple skin cancers at a high rate (10 CSCCs per year) or develop high-risk CSCC (defined by a tumor with approximately ≥20% risk of nodal metastasis). No consensus recommendation was achieved for SOTRs with a first low risk CSCC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Physicians may consider implementation of panel recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs while awaiting high-level-of-evidence data. Additional clinical trials are needed in areas where consensus was not reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R. Massey
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chrysalyne D. Schmults
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara J. Li
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah T. Arron
- Sarah Arron MD, A Professional Corporation, San Mateo, California
| | - Maryam M. Asgari
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Travis W. Blalock
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katie Blasdale
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Bryan T. Carroll
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio,Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John A. Carucci
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Alvin H. Chong
- Skin Health Institute, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine (Dermatology), St Vincent’s Hospital Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sean R. Christensen
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christina Lee Chung
- Montgomery Dermatology, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania,Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Emilie Ducroux
- Dermatology Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | | | - Carla Ferrándiz-Pulido
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matthew C. Fox
- Division of Dermatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Roel E. Genders
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Geusau
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Petter Gjersvik
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,Department of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Allison M. Hanlon
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - R. Samuel Hopkins
- Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | | | - Manisha J. Loss
- Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - José M. Mascaró
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sarah A. Myers
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bichchau T. Nguyen
- Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Dermatology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Walmar R. P. Oliveira
- Department of Dermatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Clark C. Otley
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Charlotte M. Proby
- Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Emőke Rácz
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Veronica Ruiz-Salas
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Faramarz H. Samie
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Deniz Seçkin
- Department of Dermatology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Syed N. Shah
- Department of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Thuzar M. Shin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Seaver L. Soon
- Scripps Green Hospital, Private Practice (The Skin Clinic MD), San Diego, California
| | - Thomas Stasko
- Department of Dermatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Elisa Zavattaro
- Dermatology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Nathalie C. Zeitouni
- Medical Dermatology Specialists, Phoenix, Arizona,Division of Dermatology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix
| | - Fiona O’Reilly Zwald
- Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia,O’Reilly Comprehensive Dermatology Inc, Atlanta, Georgia,Mount Vernon Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Catherine A. Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts, United Kingdom,The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thet Z, Lam AK, Ranganathan D, Aung SY, Han T, Khoo TK. Reducing non-melanoma skin cancer risk in renal transplant recipients. Nephrology (Carlton) 2021; 26:907-919. [PMID: 34240786 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
With an increasing number of renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and improving patient survival, a higher incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has been observed. NMSC in RTRs are often more numerous and biologically more aggressive than the general population, thus contributing towards an increase in morbidity and to a lesser degree, mortality. The resultant cumulative health and financial burden is a recognized concern. Proposed strategies in mitigating risks of developing NMSC and early therapeutic options thereof include tailored modification of immunosuppressants in conjunction with sun protection in all transplant patients. This review highlights the clinical and financial burden of transplant-associated skin cancers, carcinogenic mechanisms in association with immunosuppression, importance of skin cancer awareness campaign and integrated transplant skin clinic, and the potential role of chemoprotective agents. A scheme is proposed for primary and secondary prevention of NMSC based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaw Thet
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alfred K Lam
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Pathology Queensland, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dwarakanathan Ranganathan
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Soe Yu Aung
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Oncology, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thin Han
- Department of Nephrology, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tien K Khoo
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schauder DM, Kim J, Nijhawan RI. Evaluation of the Use of Capecitabine for the Treatment and Prevention of Actinic Keratoses, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Basal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156:1117-1124. [DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jinwan Kim
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Rajiv I. Nijhawan
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nemer KM, Council ML. Topical and Systemic Modalities for Chemoprevention of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. Dermatol Clin 2019; 37:287-295. [DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
7
|
Rhee J, Jo J, Han SH, Kwon JM. Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Combination Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma. Ann Dermatol 2019; 31:201-203. [PMID: 33911569 PMCID: PMC7992662 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.2.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
No effective systemic chemotherapy is well-established in basal cell carcinoma. We report a case with three simultaneous malignancies: colon cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and smoldering multiple myeloma. The patient was treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin after surgery for colon cancer. Surprisingly, he achieved a complete response for basal cell carcinoma. This is the first report of this chemotherapy regimen in basal cell carcinoma. This finding suggests that combination capecitabine and oxaliplatin can be a treatment option for patients unable to receive local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyoung Rhee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| | - Jaemin Jo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| | - Sang-Hoon Han
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| | - Jung-Mi Kwon
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandes AR, Santos AC, Sanchez-Lopez E, Kovačević AB, Espina M, Calpena AC, Veiga FJ, Garcia ML, Souto EB. Neoplastic Multifocal Skin Lesions: Biology, Etiology, and Targeted Therapies for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2017; 31:59-73. [PMID: 29262420 DOI: 10.1159/000479529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Neoplastic skin lesions are multifocal, diffuse skin infiltrations of particular relevance in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative, nodular, or crusting skin lesions. Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), namely, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and also actinic keratosis (AK), are the most common malignant tumors in humans. BCCs do not proliferate rapidly and most of the times do not metastasize, while SCCs are more infiltrative, metastatic, and destructive. AKs are precursor lesions of cutaneous SCCs. The classical therapy of NMSCs makes use of photodynamic therapy associated with chemotherapeutics. With improved understanding of the pathological mechanisms of tumor initiation, progression, and differentiation, a case is made towards the use of targeted chemotherapy with the intent to reduce the cytotoxicity of classical treatments. The present review aims to describe the current state of the art on the knowledge of NMSC, including its risks factors, oncogenes, and skin carcinogenesis, discussing the classical therapy against new therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana R Fernandes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra (FFUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy in the USA, with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) constituting approximately 20 % of all NMSC. While cSCCs typically behave in an indolent fashion and can be cured with local destructive or surgical methods, a small subset metastasizes and induces significant morbidity and mortality. Identifying and aggressively treating these "high-risk" cSCCs (HRcSCCs) is thus paramount. Recent improvements in staging cSCCs appear to offer better risk stratification than earlier staging criteria. Radiologic imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsy may be beneficial in certain cases of HRcSCC, although more studies are needed before these techniques should be uniformly incorporated into management. Surgery with complete margin control, such as that offered by the Mohs micrographic technique, represents the first-line treatment for these tumors. Radiation therapy is likely most beneficial in the adjuvant setting. Chemotherapy is typically best reserved for patients with metastatic or locally advance disease that is not controllable with surgical and/or radiation therapies. Newer targeted treatments, such as EGFR inhibitors and immunotherapies may offer greater efficacy in these settings, although further evaluation is needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Krisl JC, Doan VP. Chemotherapy and Transplantation: The Role of Immunosuppression in Malignancy and a Review of Antineoplastic Agents in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:1974-1991. [PMID: 28394486 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
It is estimated that solid organ transplant recipients have a two- to fourfold greater overall risk of malignancy than the general population. Some of the most common malignancies after transplant include skin cancers and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. In addition to known risk factors such as environmental exposures, genetics, and infection with oncogenic viruses, immunosuppression plays a large role in the development of cancer through the loss of the immunosurveillance process. The purpose of this article is to explain the role of immunosuppression in cancer and to review the classes of chemotherapeutics. The field of anticancer drugs is continually expanding and developing, with limited data on use in transplant recipients. This article aims to provide information on class review, adverse effects, dose adjustments, and drug interactions that are pertinent to the care of transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Krisl
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - V P Doan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tufaro AP, Azoury SC, Crompton JG, Straughan DM, Reddy S, Prasad NB, Shi G, Fischer AC. Rising incidence and aggressive nature of cutaneous malignancies after transplantation: An update on epidemiology, risk factors, management and surveillance. Surg Oncol 2015; 24:345-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
12
|
Rudnick EW, Thareja S, Cherpelis B. Oral therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with advanced disease and large tumor burden: a review of the literature with focus on a new generation of targeted therapies. Int J Dermatol 2015; 55:249-58; quiz 256, 258. [PMID: 26566923 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Revised: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common cancer in patients and includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Treatments useful for SCC and BCC include surgical, topical, and in advanced cases systemic chemo-radiation. This review of the literature aims to describe previous and current treatment options for oral therapy in locally advanced and metastatic NMSC otherwise unamenable to standard treatment. Oral Smoothened (Smo) inhibitors Vismodegib, Sonidegib, and Taladegib have shown to be effective in several trials. Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors Erlotinib and Gefitinib, which target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), have early supporting data and are currently undergoing large multicenter trials. Other less studied oral therapies which have shown at least partial efficacy include 5-Fluorouracil, capecitabine, and picropodophyllin. In vitro studies have elucidated new targets for dual combination oral therapy targeting both EGFR and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R). It is important to stratify treatment options based on patient risk of advanced disease, failure of conservative treatment, and ill-tolerated intravenous chemotherapy adverse events. Oral therapy in NMSC is useful in high risk patients with recurrent and aggressive disease who may not tolerate other systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Rudnick
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sumeet Thareja
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Basil Cherpelis
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parikh SA, Markovic SN, Brewer JD. Oral capecitabine to prevent recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a lung transplant recipient. Int J Dermatol 2014; 54:e358-60. [DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
14
|
Parikh SA, Patel VA, Ratner D. Advances in the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. F1000PRIME REPORTS 2014; 6:70. [PMID: 25165569 PMCID: PMC4126542 DOI: 10.12703/p6-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common non-melanoma skin cancers worldwide. While most cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas are easily managed, there is a high-risk subset of tumors that can cause severe morbidity and mortality. Tumor characteristics as well as patient characteristics contribute to the classification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas as low-risk vs. high-risk. Advances in the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas largely relate to the management of this high-risk subset. Surgical and non-surgical management options, including newer targeted molecular therapies, will be discussed here. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to determine the exact significance of individual risk factors with respect to aggressive clinical behavior and the risks of metastasis and death, as well as the role of surgical and adjuvant therapies in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal A. Parikh
- Columbia University Department of Dermatology161 Fort Washington Ave. 12th FloorNew York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Vishal A. Patel
- Columbia University Department of Dermatology161 Fort Washington Ave. 12th FloorNew York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Desiree Ratner
- Mount Sinai Beth Israel Cancer Center West325 W. 15th streetNew York, NY 10011, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Endrizzi B, Ahmed RL, Ray T, Dudek A, Lee P. Capecitabine to reduce nonmelanoma skin carcinoma burden in solid organ transplant recipients. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39:634-45. [PMID: 23379978 DOI: 10.1111/dsu.12049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solidorgan transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at greater risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) than the general population, in large part because of their immunosuppression. Select individual SOTRs demonstrate a rate of tumor development at the upper end of their cohort. Capecitabine, a prodrug converted in the body to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), may alter the risk for development of NMSC in an individual SOTR with a high rate of tumor development. OBJECTIVE To report observations of a series of 10 SOTRs treated with capecitabine as adjuvant prevention for high-incidence NMSC. METHODS Ten SOTRs were administered cycles of low-dose oral capecitabine (0.5-1.5 g/m(2) per day) for days 1 to 14 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Measurements (skin screenings, laboratory and toxicity monitoring) were performed every 1 to 3 months. Incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) before and during treatment were determined and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS The average incidence rate (mean ± SD) of SCC before treatment (0.56 ± 0.28 SCCs/month, range 0.17-1.17 SCCs/month) declined to 0.16 ± 0.11 SCCs/month (range 0-0.33 SCCs/month) during the first 12 months of treatment (mean reduction 68 ± 30.0%, range 0-100%, p < .005). Reduction in actinic keratosis was observed. Common side effects included fatigue, nausea, hand-and-foot syndrome, gout, and poor renal function. Seven of 10 participants required dose adjustment, and two of these were discontinued from the study drug because of side effects. LIMITATIONS Case series design, small observational population. CONCLUSIONS SOTRs experienced a clinically and statistically significant decline in incident SCCs during treatment with low-dose oral capecitabine, with varying degrees of side effects. Larger randomized trials will determine the dose and efficacy of capecitabine for adjuvant treatment of NMSC in SOTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Endrizzi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Shoreview, MN 55126, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bangash HK, Colegio OR. Management of non-melanoma skin cancer in immunocompromised solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2012; 13:354-76. [PMID: 22592596 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-012-0195-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The management of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs) presents a variety of clinical challenges for physicians. OTRs are at a 65-fold increased risk for developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), the most common NMSC that develops after transplantation. Risk factors contributing to the development of NMSCs in OTRs include a past medical history of any previous skin cancer, a personal history of significant sun exposure and a fair skin complexion or phototype. Further, greater immunosuppressive medication levels lead to an increased risk of NMSCs. Among immunosuppressants, specific older agents such as azathioprine and cyclosporine may increase the risk of developing NMSCs in contrast to newer agents such as sirolimus. Early skin biopsy and treatment of premalignant and malignant lesions are essential for treating these patients successfully. In this regard, the concept of field cancerization has been instructive in broadening treatments to include entire affected areas rather than individual lesions given that the areas with significant ultraviolet irradiation will continue to develop numerous individual precancerous and cancerous lesions. Field therapy with photodynamic therapy or topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod or diclofenac is often used in OTRs according to individual patient tolerability. Prompt excision or Mohs micrographic surgery is the standard of care of primary, uncomplicated squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas. For patients with in-transit or metastatic squamous cell carcinomas, adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, and staging by sentinel lymph node dissection may be employed. For patients who develop numerous SCC per year, chemoprophylaxis can be effective in limiting the burden of disease. In consultation with the multidisciplinary transplant team, the immunosuppressive regimen can be revised to lower overall immunosuppression or altered to include newer drugs that have decreased oncogenic potential in OTRs. The greatest impact may be made by the prevention of NMSCs through simple, but rigorous, patient education on the benefits of UV protection, periodic self-skin examinations, and regular follow-ups. Accordingly, vitamin D and calcium supplementation should also be incorporated in transplant recipients. Management of OTRs requires patient education, frequent motivation for vigilance, regular follow-up, and interdisciplinary collaboration between transplant surgeons, nephrologists, hepatologists, cardiologists, transplant nurses, dermatologists, oncologists, pharmacists, and other relevant physicians ideally orchestrated by the essential transplant coordinators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haider K Bangash
- Transplant Dermatology Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8059, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tessari G, Girolomoni G. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: update on epidemiology, risk factors, and management. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38:1622-30. [PMID: 22805312 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02520.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) are the most frequently observed cancers in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) and may have a significant disease burden. OBJECTIVE To provide an update regarding the epidemiology and management of NMSC in SOTR. RESULTS Ten-year incidence rates range from 10% in Italy to 20% in Northern Europe to 70% in Australia. More than 50% of NMSC are located on sun-exposed areas (head, dorsum of hands). Many risk factors have been identified, including age at transplantation, fair skin, type of immunosuppressive drugs, cumulative sun exposure, viral infections, and various genetic markers. Patients with a first NMSC have a 49 times higher risk of developing a subsequent NMSC. Skin self-examination and photoprotection should be encouraged in all transplanted patients. Long-term skin surveillance, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of any suspicious lesion, reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, and conversion to m-TOR inhibitors can be also effective measures for reduction of NMSC incidence. CONCLUSIONS NMSC is the most frequent cancer observed in SOTR. Early diagnosis, patient education, and modification of immunosuppression are effective measures for reduction of NMSC incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Tessari
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Patients with autoimmune and inflammatory conditions often receive long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Some of the largest patient populations with iatrogenic immunosuppression include patients who have received solid-organ transplants or who have rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis. Although treatments improve patient outcomes, individuals with immunosuppression subsequently may have an increased risk of skin cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L DePry
- Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, 1750 Independence Ave, Kansas City, MO 64106, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Behshad R, Garcia-Zuazaga J, Bordeaux JS. Systemic treatment of locally advanced nonmetastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:1169-77. [PMID: 21777215 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10524.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a small subset of locally advanced nonmetastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) for which local therapy is not curative or feasible, making systemic therapy a possible treatment option. OBJECTIVES To calculate overall response rates (ORR), median time to response (TTR) and median duration of response (DOR) of locally advanced nonmetastatic cSCC to systemic therapy [targeted agents, biological response modifiers (BRM) and chemotherapy]. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medline and PubMed were searched for reports of nonmetastatic locally advanced cSCC treated with systemic therapy from 1970 to 2011. No limits were placed on study design. ORR, TTR and DOR were calculated for systemic therapy overall and for each treatment category. RESULTS Twenty-eight observational studies yielded 119 patients for analysis. The ORR for systemic therapy was 72% (TTR 9 weeks, DOR 42 weeks). Targeted therapy and BRM achieved ORR of 100% (TTR 12 weeks, DOR 20 weeks) and 86% (TTR 10 weeks, DOR 20 weeks), respectively, and oral chemotherapy, intravenous chemotherapy and intra-arterial chemotherapy achieved ORR of 20% (TTR 10 weeks, DOR 24 weeks), 68% (TTR 3 weeks, DOR 44 weeks) and 100% (TTR 15 weeks, DOR 112 weeks), respectively. A limitation of this study was that no controlled data were identified and sample sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS Systemic treatment leads to objective responses in locally advanced cutaneous SCC that are not amenable to local cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Behshad
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Lakeside 3500, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
O'Reilly Zwald F, Brown M. Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: advances in therapy and management: part II. Management of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:263-279. [PMID: 21763562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2010] [Revised: 10/30/2010] [Accepted: 11/20/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The management of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients is a challenge to both the dermatologist and transplant physician. Part II of this continuing medical education review offers an approach to the management of this increasing problem. The importance of specialty dermatology clinics providing access to transplant patients, frequent skin cancer screening, patient education, and multidisciplinary care is discussed. The management of low risk squamous cell carcinoma with topical therapies, photodynamic therapy, systemic retinoids, and capecitabine is reviewed. Revision of immunosuppression in the management of high-risk patients is discussed in association with the potential role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for aggressive disease. Finally, management of in-transit and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma is reviewed, with a discussion of the role of more recent innovative therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in advanced squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona O'Reilly Zwald
- Department of Dermatology and Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Marc Brown
- Department of Dermatology and Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Greenberg JN, Zwald FO. Management of Skin Cancer in Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Dermatol Clin 2011; 29:231-41, ix. [DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2011.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Leiter U, Garbe C. [Skin cancer in organ transplant patients. Epidemiology and management]. Hautarzt 2010; 61:207-13. [PMID: 20145902 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-009-1862-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Transplant recipients are at significantly increased risk of cancer development as a long term complication. Skin cancer is the most common cancer, representing 40-50% of post transplant malignancies. In the first 10 years post transplantation, some 15%-40% of patients develop skin cancer, primarily squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma, but also melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma and virally-induced Kaposi sarcoma. The management of skin cancer includes secondary prophylaxis and address attention to areas of widespread actinic damage, usually with topical agents. In high risk skin cancer or metastatic disease a substantial reduction in immunosuppression to switching to mTOR inhibitors appears to substantially improve the prognosis. The management of the individual tumor types is discussed; in general it follows the current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Leiter
- Zentrum für Dermato-Onkologie, Universitäts-Hautklinik, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tübingen.
| | | |
Collapse
|