Complete response after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplatation in metastatic breast cancer results in survival benefit

Does the use of targeted agents in advanced gastroesophageal cancer increase complete response? A meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials

Purpose

We aimed to investigate whether the use of targeted agents (TAs) in advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) increased the complete response (CR) and to assess the surrogate endpoints for survival in the targeted treatment of GEC by using a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Eligible studies were identified using Medline, PubMed, and meeting abstracts. Searches were last updated on April 30, 2018. We calculated the incidence and Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) of CR events in patients assigned to TAs compared with controls. Simple linear regression models were fitted for median overall survival (OS) and each surrogate [median progression-free survival (PFS), CRs, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR), respectively].

Results

A total of 7,892 GEC patients from 18 RCTs were included for analysis. The incidence of CR in GEC patients treated with TAs was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.3%–3.0%) compared with 1.7% (95% CI, 1.0%–2.7%) in the control arms. The use of TAs in advanced GEC had a tendency to improve the possibility of archiving CR (Peto OR 1.42; 95% CI, 0.98–2.04; P=0.064) compared with controls. Subgroup analysis according to treatment TAs showed that the addition of antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to chemotherapy in GEC significantly improved the CR rate in comparison with control (Peto OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.02–3.09; P=0.044), but not for other molecular TAs (P=0.49 for angiogenesis inhibitors, P=0.66 for mesenchymal-epithelial transition inhibitors). We also found that the addition of TAs to first-line therapy (Peto OR 1.41; 95% CI, 0.94–2.11; P=0.098) had a tendency to increase the chance of obtaining a CR, but not for second-line therapy (Peto OR 1.47; 95% CI, 0.60–3.55; P=0.40). In addition, correlation analysis indicates that PFS, ORR, and DCR were strongly correlated with OS for GEC patients receiving TAs (r=0.85 for PFS; r=0.86 for ORR; r=0.81 for DCR). No marked correlation was found between OS and CRs (r=0.43; P=0.18).

Conclusion

Although the CR is a rate event in advanced GEC patients, adding the TAs to therapies, especially for anti-EGFR agents, increases the chance of archiving CR in comparison with the controls. PFS, ORR, and DCR are significantly correlated with OS and could be used as surrogate endpoints in patients with GEC who have received TA therapy, but not for CR.

Does the addition of targeted biological agents to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer increase complete response? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The study assessed whether the addition of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) increases the complete response (CR) compared with controls.

METHOD

PubMed was reviewed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with approved MoAbs (bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab) vs non-MoAbs as first-line therapy for patients with advanced CRC. The incidence and ratio of CR events were calculated in patients assigned to MoAbs compared with controls.

RESULTS

A total of 3790 patients from nine RCTs were included for analysis. The overall incidence of CR in patients treated with MoAbs was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.7-3.3%) compared with 1.3% (95% CI: 0.8-2.2%) in controls. Comparison of the different types of MoAbs showed that the incidence of CR was higher for bevacizumab (3.1%, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3%) than for cetuximab (0.8%, 95% CI: 0.4-1.8%). The addition of MoAbs to chemotherapy significantly increased the OR of obtaining a CR compared with controls (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.12-3.46; P = 0.02). No significant differences in the OR were observed in any of the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The CR is a rare event in advanced CRC; however, the addition of MoAbs to first-line chemotherapy significantly increases the curative rate of metastatic disease compared with controls.

Genetic engineering of hematopoiesis for targeted IFN-α delivery inhibits breast cancer progression

The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment represents a major hurdle to cancer therapy. We developed a gene transfer strategy into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to target transgene expression to tumor-infiltrating monocytes/macrophages. Using a combination of transcriptional and microRNA-mediated control, we achieved selective expression of an interferon-α (IFN-α) transgene in differentiated monocytes of human hematochimeric mice. We show that IFN-α transgene expression does not impair engraftment and long-term multilineage repopulation of NSG (NOD/LtSz-scidIL2Rγ(null)) mice by transplanted human HSCs. By providing a source of human cytokines in the mice, we improved the functional reconstitution of human myeloid, natural killer, and T cell lineages, and achieved enhanced immune-mediated clearance of transplanted human breast tumors when hematopoiesis was engineered for tumor-targeted IFN-α expression. By applying our strategy to mouse breast cancer models, we achieved inhibition of tumor progression and experimental metastases in an autologous setting, likely through enhanced generation of effector T cells and their recruitment to the neoplastic tissues. By forcing IFN-α expression in tumor-infiltrating macrophages, we blunted their innate protumoral activity and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment toward more effective dendritic cell activation and immune effector cell cytotoxicity. Overall, our studies validate the feasibility, safety, and therapeutic potential of a new cancer gene therapy strategy, and open the way to test this approach as adjuvant therapy in advanced breast cancer patients.

Targeted therapies and complete responses in first line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A meta-analysis of published trials

Antiangiogenic agents (AAs) have reported grater efficacy compared to interferon. Despite these advances, radiological complete response to therapy is rare. We meta-analyzed the incidence of complete response in patients treated with AAs and in controls in main randomized clinical trials for first-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PubMed was reviewed for phase II-III randomized clinical trials with AAs vs. non-AAs in patients with good or intermediate prognosis. We calculated the relative risk of events in patients assigned to AAs compared to control. Five RCTs were found; four were phase III and one was phase II. A total of 2747 patients was valuable for final analysis and randomized to receive AAs or control. Patients in the control-group had interferon (85%) or placebo (15%); patients in the AAs-group received bevacizumab (48%), sunitinib (26%), pazopanib (20%) or sorafenib (6%). The incidence of complete response in patients treated with AAs was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2-2.8) compared to 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7-2.1) in the control arm. Comparing the different type of AAs, the incidence of complete response was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.2-3.8) in the bevacizumab group and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.1-2.5) in the TKIs group. The relative risk to have a complete response was 1.52 (95% CI, 0.85-2.73; p=0.16) in patients treated with AAs compared to controls; this was found higher in patients treated with TKIs compared to bevacizumab. The complete response is a rare event in metastatic kidney tumor, even if AAs reported greater efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and of overall response rate, they did not increase the curative rate of metastatic disease. Probably, some biologic factors other than angiogenesis may influence the complete response in this disease.

Critical issues on high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (AHPCT) for high-risk (HR) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is no longer an option.

AREAS COVERED

An expert panel including medical oncologists and hematologists produce an opinion paper on the use of HDC and AHPCT in BC patients and they explain why they believe that; despite inconclusive results thus far, this treatment should have an ongoing role in breast cancer management under clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

HDC with AHPCT has become a safe treatment modality and an advantage in disease-free survival has been observed in most of the studies with HDC, with the caveat that today, even a limited relapse-free survival and progression-free survival benefit is sufficient for the approval of new antineoplastic agents. Moreover, in HRBC, an overall survival benefit by HDC could be achieved in the HER2-ve and triple-negative populations and, in this setting, HDC with AHPCT represents a therapeutic option that can be proposed to well-informed patients. In MBC, the HDC approach should be investigated further in selected patients with HER2-ve, chemosensitive disease. This paper is not intended to give any conclusion, but rather to open a debate on the value of HDC in HR and MBC.

Long-term survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving intensified chemotherapy and stem cell rescue: data from the Italian registry

The median survival of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is 18-24 months, and fewer than 5% are alive and disease free at 5 years. We report toxicity and survival in a cohort of MBC patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) in Italy between 1990 and 2005. Data set for survival analysis has been obtained for 415 patients. Clinical parameters including probability of transplant-related mortality (TRM), PFS and OS. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 0-172), OS and PFS at 5 and 10 years in the whole population were 47/23 and 32/14%, respectively. A total 239 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 33 months (range 2-174). Survival was significantly more pronounced in patients harboring hormone receptor positive tumors (P=0.028), without visceral metastases (P=0.009) and in women with chemosensitive disease (P<0.0001). Sixty eight patients (20.4%) who received HDC in partial response, stable or progressive disease underwent conversion to CR. TRM was 2.5% overall and 1.3% since 2000. Our findings suggest that could be a role for HDC and AHSCT in delaying disease progression and possibly cure a subset of MBC patient harboring chemosensitive tumors.

International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: can metastatic breast cancer be cured?

A distinctive subset of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is oligometastatic disease, which is characterized by single or few detectable metastatic lesions. The existing treatment guidelines for patients with localized MBC include surgery, radiotherapy, and regional chemotherapy. The European School of Oncology-Metastatic Breast Cancer Task Force addressed the management of these patients in its first consensus recommendations published in 2007. The Task Force endorsed the possibility of a more aggressive and multidisciplinary approach for patients with oligometastatic disease, stressing also the need for clinical trials in this patient population. At the sixth European Breast Cancer Conference, held in Berlin in March 2008, the second public session on MBC guidelines addressed the controversial issue of whether MBC can be cured. In this commentary, we summarize the discussion and related recommendations regarding the available therapeutic options that are possibly associated with cure in these patients. In particular, data on local (surgery and radiotherapy) and chemotherapy options are discussed. Large retrospective series show an association between surgical removal of the primary tumor or of lung metastases and improved long-term outcome in patients with oligometastatic disease. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, removal of the primary tumor or isolated metastatic lesions may be an attractive therapeutic strategy in this subset of patients, offering rapid disease control and potential for survival benefit. Some improvement in outcome may also be achieved with optimization of systemic therapies, possibly in combination with optimal local treatment.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors in adults

Supported by experimental evidence and convincing results of early phase II studies, since the 1980s high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (AHSCT) has been uncritically adopted by many oncologists as a potentially curative option for several solid tumors. As a result, the number (and size) of randomized trials comparing this approach with conventional chemotherapy initiated (and often abandoned before completion) in this setting was limited and the benefit of a greater escalation of dose of chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation in solid tumors remains, with the possible exception of breast carcinoma (BC) and germ cell tumors (GCT), largely unsettled. In this article, we review and comment on the data from studies to date of HDC for solid tumors in adults.