Ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness in patients with and without intradialytic hypertension

BACKGROUND

Increased arterial stiffness is suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of intradialytic-hypertension (IDH). Ambulatory pulse-wave-velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor for all-cause-mortality in haemodialysis and its prognostic power is better than office PWV. This is the first study examining ambulatory central blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness parameters in patients with and without IDH.

METHODS

This study examined 45 patients with IDH (SBP rise ≥10 mmHg from pre- to post-dialysis and post-dialysis SBP ≥150 mmHg) in comparison with 197 patients without IDH. All participants underwent 48-h ABPM with Mobil-O-Graph-NG; parameters of central haemodynamics, wave reflection and PWV were estimated.

RESULTS

Age, dialysis vintage and interdialytic weight gain did not differ between-groups. IDH patients had higher 48-h cSBP (131.7 ± 16.2 vs. 119.2 ± 15.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), 48-h cDBP (86.7 ± 12.7 vs. 79.6 ± 11.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and 48-h cPP (45.5 ± 10.4 vs. 39.8 ± 10.0 mmHg, p = 0.001) compared to patients without IDH. Similarly, during day- and nighttime periods, cSBP/cDBP and cPP levels were higher in IDH-patients compared to non-IDH. Forty-eight-hour augmentation pressure and index, but not AIx(75) were higher in IDH patients; 48-h PWV (10.0 ± 2.0 vs. 9.2 ± 2.1 m/s, p = 0.017) was significantly higher in patients with IDH. The two study groups displayed different trajectories in central BP and PWV over the course of the recording; IDH patients had steadily high values of the above variables during the 2 days of the interdialytic-interval, whereas non-IDH patients showed a gradual elevation, with significant increases from the 1st to 2nd 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

IDH patients have significantly higher levels of ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness parameters and a different course over the 48-h period compared with non-IDH patients. Increased arterial stiffness could be a prominent factor associated with the high burden of cardiovascular disease in this population.

Management of intradialytic hypertension: current evidence and future perspectives

Intradialytic hypertension (IDH), that is, a paradoxical rise in blood pressure (BP) during or immediately after a hemodialysis session, affects approximately 10-15% of the hemodialysis population. It is currently recognized as a phenomenon of major clinical significance as recent studies have shown that BP elevation extends to the whole interdialytic interval and associates with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The pathophysiology of IDH is complex involving volume and sodium overload, endothelial dysfunction, excess renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system activation, and other mechanisms. For several years, there was a scarcity of studies regarding IDH treatment; recently, however, several attempts to examine the effect of nonpharmacological and pharmacological measures on BP levels in IDH are made. This review attempts to summarize this latest evidence in the field of management of IDH and discuss areas for future research.

Intradialytic hypertension: epidemiology and pathophysiology of a silent killer

The term intradialytic hypertension (IDH) describes a paradoxical rise in blood pressure (BP) during or immediately after the hemodialysis session. Although it was formerly considered a phenomenon without clinical implications, current evidence suggests that IDH may affect up to 15% of hemodialysis patients and exhibit independent associations with future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, during the last decade, several studies have tried to elucidate the complex pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon. Volume overload, intradialytic sodium gain, overactivity of the sympathetic-nervous-system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, endothelial dysfunction and dialysis-related electrolyte disturbances have been proposed to be involved in the pathogenesis of the BP increase during hemodialysis. This review attempts to summarize existing evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of the distinct phenomenon of IDH.

Dry-weight reduction improves intradialytic hypertension only in patients with high predialytic blood pressure

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional volume reduction by ultrafiltration can improve blood pressure in patients with intradialytic hypertension (IDH) defined as at least 10 mmHg systolic blood pressure (SBP) rise during hemodialysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, open-label, single-center study included 11 IDH patients with normal predialytic blood pressure (BP) (group A), 11 IDH patients with high predialytic BP (group B), and 18 patients without IDH as control. Serum angiotensin-II, aldosterone (ALD), angiotensin-converting enzyme, endothelin-1, nitric oxide, and asymmetric dimethylarginine were measured before and after the treatments.

RESULTS

Basic angiotensin-converting enzyme, ALD, endothelin-1, and asymmetric dimethylarginine serum levels were significantly increased in group B compared with control (P < 0.05). On comparing the results from the first and 13th dialysis sessions in group A, the dry weight was reduced by - 0.15 ± 0.16 kg after 12 sessions and the predialytic SBP increased by 3.18 ± 6.25 mmHg before and by 7.37 ± 14.90 mmHg at 4 h during the 13th session. In group B, the dry weight was reduced by 0.67 ± 0.53 kg (P = 0.006 vs. group A) at the 13th session and they had - 12.09 ± 16.20 mmHg less SBP before (P = 0.009 vs. group A) and - 11.82 ± 14.66 mmHg at 4 h of the 13th session. The decrease in dry weight was associated with significantly higher decreases in angiotensin-II and ALD serum levels in group B compared with group A.

CONCLUSION

Reducing fluid overload in IDH patients with high predialytic BP can effectively improve their BP, but had no effect on BP in normal predialytic BP IDH cases.

Postdialysis Hypertension: Associated Factors, Patient Profiles, and Cardiovascular Mortality

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A postdialytic increase in blood pressure (BP) is a recognized but often an overlooked complication. The epidemiology and predisposing factors are still not well defined. We studied a large sample of Italian dialysis patients to assess the prevalence of postdialysis hypertension (PDHYPER), defined as any increase of systolic BP (SBP) >10mm, Hg above the predialysis value, the associated factors and its role in cardiovascular (CV) mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this observational study, we assessed dialysis associated changes in BP in 4,292 hemodialysis (HD) patients over 1 month (51,504 sessions). We compared the clinical characteristics of the patients with stable BP values during the HD session with those with PDHYPER. We also assessed the impact of PDHYPER on CV mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 994 (23.1%) patients had PDHYPER. Patients with PDHYPER were more likely to be hypertesive, older, have a shorter dialysis vintage, be male, have lower SBP, lower changes in weight during HD, and receive more antihypertensive medications. These predictive factors were shown to be associated with an interaction between weight loss and dialysis, suggesting a volume-related mechanism in its pathogenesis. PDHYPER was also associated with CV mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study on a large Italian cohort of dialysis patients, the prevalence of PDHYPER was higher than what was previously reported and is a significant risk factor for CV mortality in dialysis patients. The pathogenesis is multifactorial but hypertensive state, antihypertensive medications, and extracellular volume expansion appear to play a major role.

Increased postdialysis systolic blood pressure is associated with extracellular overhydration in hemodialysis outpatients

Recently, intradialytic hypertension was reported to be associated with increased mortality for hemodialysis patients. To determine whether volume status plays a role in dialysis-associated hypertension, we prospectively audited 531 patients that had volume assessments measured by multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance during their midweek dialysis session. Mean pre- and postdialysis weights were 73.2 vs 71.7 kg, and systolic blood pressures (SBPs) 140.5 vs. 130.3 mm Hg, respectively. Patients were divided into groups based on a fall in SBP of 20 mm Hg or more (32%), an increased SBP of 10 mm Hg or more (18%), and a stable group (50%). There were no differences in patient demographics, dialysis prescriptions, predialysis weight, total body (TBW), and extracellular (ECW) and intracellular water (ICW). However, the change in weight was significantly less in the increased blood pressure group (1.01 kg vs. stable 1.65, and 1.7 hypotensive). The ratio of ECW to TBW was significantly higher in the increased blood pressure group, particularly post dialysis (39.1 vs. stable 38.7% and fall in blood pressure group 38.7%). ECW overhydration was significantly greater in the increased blood pressure group post dialysis (0.7 (0.17 to 1.1) vs. stable 0.39 (-0.2 to 0.95) and fall in blood pressure group 0.38 (-0.19 to 0.86) liter). We found that patients who had increased blood pressure post dialysis had greater hydration status, particularly ECW. Thus, patients who increase their blood pressure post dialysis should have review of target weight, consideration of lowering the post-dialysis weight, and may benefit from increasing dialysis session time or frequency.

Hemodynamic and pathophysiological characteristics of intradialytic blood pressure elevation in patients with end-stage renal disease

An increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) after hemodialysis (intradialytic-HTN) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients on regular hemodialysis. However, the hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic characteristics of intradialytic-HTN and its impact on clinical outcomes are unclear. A retrospective analysis of 84 patients (45 men, 70±9 years) stratified into three groups on the basis of SBP response from pre- to post-hemodialysis: GHTN (intradialytic-HTN, SBP increase 10 mm Hg), GDROP<15 mm Hg (SBP drop <15 mm Hg), and GDROP15 mm Hg (SBP drop 15 mm Hg). Hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessments were performed pre- and post-hemodialysis, and patients were followed for 41±17 months. GHTN had higher blood glucose and lower baseline SBP, serum potassium and total cholesterol. Cardiothoracic ratio was smaller, and peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') was lower in GHTN. During hemodialysis, SBP and diastolic blood pressure increased only in GHTN. After hemodialysis, left ventricular (LV) filling pressure (E/E' ratio) decreased only in GDROP15 mm Hg, resulting in a higher E/E' ratio in GHTN than GDROP15 mm Hg. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between blood glucose and intradialytic-HTN, whereas cardiothoracic ratio, pre-hemodialysis SBP and the change in E/E' ratio with hemodialysis were negatively related to intradialytic-HTN. During follow-up, GHTN had more cardiovascular deaths than GDROP15 mm Hg (P=0.03). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lower serum potassium and previous coronary artery disease, but not intradialytic-HTN, were associated with cardiovascular deaths. A higher LV afterload and elevated filling pressures after hemodialysis, indicative of increased cardiovascular stiffening and impaired diastolic filling, may contribute in part to an increased cardiovascular burden in patients with intradialytic-HTN.

Intradialytic hypertension: a less-recognized cardiovascular complication of hemodialysis

Intradialytic hypertension, defined as an increase in blood pressure during or immediately after hemodialysis that results in postdialysis hypertension, has long been recognized to complicate the hemodialysis procedure, yet often is largely ignored. In light of recent investigations suggesting that intradialytic hypertension is associated with adverse outcomes, this review broadly covers the epidemiologic characteristics, prognostic significance, potential pathogenic mechanisms, prevention, and possible treatment of intradialytic hypertension. Intradialytic hypertension affects up to 15% of hemodialysis patients and occurs more frequently in patients who are older, have lower dry weights, are prescribed more antihypertensive medications, and have lower serum creatinine levels. Recent studies associated intradialytic hypertension independently with higher hospitalization rates and decreased survival. Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension are uncertain, it likely is multifactorial and includes subclinical volume overload, sympathetic overactivity, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, endothelial cell dysfunction, and specific dialytic techniques. Prevention and treatment of intradialytic hypertension may include careful attention to dry weight, avoidance of dialyzable antihypertensive medications, limiting the use of high-calcium dialysate, achieving adequate sodium solute removal during hemodialysis, and using medications that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or decrease endothelin 1 levels. In summary, although intradialytic hypertension often is underappreciated, recent studies suggest that it should not be ignored. However, further work is necessary to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of intradialytic hypertension and its appropriate management and determine whether treatment of intradialytic hypertension can improve clinical outcomes.

The growing problem of intradialytic hypertension

Intradialytic hypertension is not a rare complication of dialysis, with a prevalence of 5-15% among hemodialysis patients, and it seems to be associated with adverse outcomes. This complex phenomenon is not well understood, and many uncertainties exist regarding its pathophysiologic mechanisms and appropriate treatment strategies. Mechanisms that might be involved in the pathogenesis of intradialytic hypertension include extracellular volume overload, increased cardiac output, changes in electrolyte levels (particularly sodium), activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, and endothelial cell dysfunction. Most current treatment strategies are based only on expert opinion and not on the results of randomized clinical trials, as very little data on the therapy of intradialytic hypertension are available. The most important treatment is adequate sodium and water removal, but reducing sympathetic hyperactivity and reducing endothelin-1 levels should also be considered. Well-designed, randomized clinical trials are urgently needed to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms of this complex phenomenon and to improve its diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.

Is there a role for endothelin-1 in the hemodynamic changes during hemodialysis?

BACKGROUND

The etiology of hemodialysis (HD)-induced hypotension and hypertension remains speculative. There is mounting evidence that endothelin-1 (ET-1) may play a vital role in these hemodynamic changes. We examined the possible role of intradialytic changes of ET-1 in the pathogenesis of hypotension and rebound hypertension during HD.

METHODS

The present study included 45 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on regular HD. They were divided according to their hemodynamic status during HD into three groups (group I had stable intradialytic hemodynamics, group II had dialysis-induced hypotension, and group III had rebound hypertension during HD). In addition, 15 healthy volunteers were included as a control group. Pulse and blood pressure were monitored before, during (every half hour), and after HD session. ET-1 level was measured at the beginning, middle, and end of HD. ET-1 was measured in the control group for comparison.

RESULTS

Pre-dialysis levels of ET-1 were significantly higher in dialysis patients compared to the controls (P < 0.001); however, they were comparable in the three HD groups. The post-dialysis ET-1 level was not changed significantly in group I compared with predialysis values (14.49 +/- 2.04 vs. 14.33 +/- 2.23 pg/ml; P = NS), while the ET-1 concentration decreased significantly in group II and increased in group III in comparison to predialysis values (8.56 +/- 1.44 vs. 11.75 +/- 2.51; 16.39 +/- 3.12 vs. 11.93 +/- 2.11 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Altered ET-1 levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of rebound hypertension and hypotension during HD.

Physiological changes during hemodialysis in patients with intradialysis hypertension

Intradialysis hypertension is a frustrating complication among hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study was conducted to investigate the physiological changes during intradialytic hypertension. The beat-to-beat continuous heart rate, hematocrit (Hct) changes during HD, serum levels of nitric oxide, plasma levels of catecholamine, renin, endothelin (ET-1), cardiac output (CO), and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) were measured before and after HD in patients prone to develop intradialysis hypertension (n = 30) and from age, sex-matched control HD subjects (n = 30). It was found that the baseline values of Hct, serum levels of nitric oxide, plasma levels of catecholamine, renin, and ET-1, CO, PVR, and power index (low frequency/high frequency ratios) of heart rate variability were not significantly different between the patients and control subjects. In the hypertension-prone group, the plasma levels of catecholamine, renin, and the serial measurements of power index, did not show significant changes. However, the patients showed a significant elevation of systemic vascular resistance (56.8 +/- 9.2% vs 17.7 +/- 9.5; P < 0.05), ET-1 (510.9 +/- 43.3 vs 276.7 +/- 30.1 pg/ml; P < 0.05) and a significant decrease of nitric oxide (NO)/ET-1 balance (0.018 +/- 0.003 vs 0.034 +/- 0.005; P < 0.05) at the end of HD compared with the control patients. It was found that the physiological changes in intradialysis hypertension patients were characterized by inappropriately increased PVR through mechanisms that did not involve sympathetic stimulation or renin activation but might be related with altered NO/ET-1 balance.

UNRESOLVED ISSUES IN DIALYSIS: Management of Intradialytic Hypertension: The Ongoing Challenge

There is no widely accepted definition of intradialytic hypertension. Arbitrary clinical definitions have included an increase in blood pressure during or immediately after hemodialysis, a rise in blood pressure during the second or third hour of dialysis, and an increase in blood pressure that is resistant to ultrafiltration. To date, no studies have evaluated the prevalence and prognostic importance of intradialytic hypertension. The pathogenesis of intradialytic hypertension is complex and is due in part to extracellular fluid volume expansion, increased cardiac output, activation of the renin-angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system, increased circulating vasoactive substances resulting in peripheral vasoconstriction, erythropoietin use, and fluctuations in electrolytes and removal of antihypertensive medications during the dialysis procedure. Management strategies of intradialytic hypertension are based on expert opinion using the pathophysiologic principles described above. We conclude that additional epidemiologic, basic science, and interventional studies are needed to further elucidate the prevalence, prognostic importance, pathophysiology, and potential treatment of intradialytic hypertension.