Overcoming Immunologic Incompatibility: Transplanting the Difficult to Transplant Patient

Antibody testing strategies for deceased donor kidney transplantation after immunomodulatory therapy

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulatory protocols including intravenous immunoglobulin/rituximab (IVIG/R) are employed to decrease anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody levels for patients broadly sensitized to HLA and increase chances for transplantation with a compatible deceased donor (DD). The aim of our study was to identify the optimal antibody levels allowing for selection of compatible DDs for these sensitized patients.

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2009, 108 patients broadly sensitized to HLA who had reached the top of the DD waitlist were treated with IVIG/R. Antibody levels were monitored monthly by Luminex-based single-antigen bead assay. The antigens identified to produce positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (XMs; >200,000 standard fluorescence intensity [SFI]/10,000 median fluorescence intensity [MFI]) were determined to be unacceptable and entered into the United Network for Organ Sharing database generating the calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA). The mean CPRA (mCPRA) for this group was more than 80. DDs were selected based on T-cell flow XMs (FXMs) less than 250 MCS and B-cell FXMs less than 300 mean channel shifts (MCS).

RESULTS

Monthly Luminex-based single-antigen assays showed that the IVIG/R therapy decreased antibody levels for a period of 30 to 120 days. Of the 108 patients treated, 80 (74%) were transplanted and 28 (26%) were not (mCPRA 96 ± 11). Forty-two (53%) patients were transplanted with a positive FXM; 28 (35%) patients (mCPRA 84 ± 25) were transplanted with a negative FXM; and 10 patients (12%; mCPRA 90 ± 19) received zero HLA ABDR mismatched grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

After therapy, careful selection of acceptable DD involves the antibody profiling strength and XM results. These approaches provide patients broadly sensitized to HLA with an opportunity for compatible DD transplantation.

The strength of donor-specific antibody is a more reliable predictor of antibody-mediated rejection than flow cytometry crossmatch analysis in desensitized kidney recipients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCCM) as tools for predicting antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in desensitized kidney recipients. Sera from 44 patients with DSA at the time of transplant were reviewed. Strength of DSA was determined by single antigen Luminex bead assay and expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). T- and B-cell FCCM results were expressed as mean channel shift (MCS). AMR was diagnosed by C4d deposition on biopsy. Incidence of early AMR was 31%. Significant differences in the number of DSAs (p = 0.0002), cumulative median MFI in DSA class I (p = 0.0004), and total (class I + class II) DSA (p < 0.0001) were found in patients with and without AMR. No significant difference was seen in MCS of T and B FCCM (p = 0.095 and p = 0.307, respectively). The three-yr graft survival in desensitized patients with DSA having total MFI < 9500 was 100% compared to 76% with those having total MFI > 9500 (p = 0.022). Desensitized kidney transplant recipients having higher levels of class I and total DSA MFI are at high risk for AMR and poor graft survival. Recipient DSA MFI appears to be a more reliable predictor of AMR than MCS of FCCM.

Perception versus reality?: Virtual crossmatch--how to overcome some of the technical and logistic limitations

The goal of this work was to evaluate concordance between (a) actual flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) that is performed by the OPO laboratory servicing our transplant center and (b) virtual XM (vXM) prediction based on antibody identification by solid-phase methods performed in our laboratory. A total of 1586 FCXM, performed between June 2007 and September 2008, between all potential deceased donors in our region and sera from patients awaiting kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant, listed at Northwestern Memorial Hospital were evaluated. A key finding of this analysis was the understanding that a thorough vXM cannot be performed in some donor/recipient pairs due to the lack of certain antibody profile data specific to the donor in question. Obtaining more in depth and stringent information regarding antibody specificities, we demonstrate an excellent sensitivity and specificity of the vXM assays- 86.1% and 96.8%, respectively, with a positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratios of 26.9 and 0.14, respectively. The vXM can serve as an outstanding tool to predict HLA compatibility between donor and recipient, with the caveat that the presence/absence of all antibodies against the potential donor and their strength have been thoroughly investigated.

Survival in Allosensitized Children After Listing for Cardiac Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the effect of pre-transplant alloantibody in the pediatric cardiac transplant population.

METHODS

All cardiac listings (n = 298) at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh from January 1990 through February 2006 were reviewed to determine the impact of allosensitization on transplantation outcomes. Analysis focused on: (1) wait list outcomes; (2) survival from the time of listing, regardless of subsequent transplantation; (3) post-transplant graft and patient survival; and (4) post-transplant freedom from graft vasculopathy. Institutional policy required a negative, prospective crossmatch for candidates with panel-reactive antibody >20%.

RESULTS

Alloantibody data were available for 252 (85%) listings. Median time to transplantation was greater for sensitized vs non-sensitized subjects (2.7 months vs 1.3 months; p = 0.02). At 1 year after listing, sensitized subjects had a higher incidence of death (22% vs 8.4%; p = 0.055). Survival at all time-points after listing (regardless of transplantation) was worse for sensitized subjects (p = 0.04). Although no statistically significant differences in post-transplant graft or patient survival were noted, pre-transplant allosensitization was associated with decreased freedom from graft vasculopathy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 6.45; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

A policy requiring a negative, prospective crossmatch for highly sensitized candidates is associated with longer wait list time and higher mortality after listing. The development of graft vasculopathy appears to be influenced by the presence of pre-transplant alloantibody.

Desensitization strategies enabling successful renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Currently, the number of highly sensitized patients awaiting a renal transplant is increasing on the waiting lists of different organ exchange organizations. Due to the presence of antibodies against a broad variety of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specificities, highly sensitized patients have a markedly reduced chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative organ. It has long been recognized that hyperacute rejection is associated with the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplantation. Meanwhile treatment protocols have been developed to achieve successful transplantation across antibody barriers. Therefore, the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and a positive serological crossmatch are no longer considered as an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation. Mainly, two desensitization protocols have been established in order to overcome a positive crossmatch or to enhance the chance of highly sensitized patients to receive a crossmatch-negative organ: high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or low-dose IVIg in combination with plasmapheresis. Herein, we summarize the characteristics of these two treatment regimes along with other alternative approaches that are currently used for the management of kidney graft recipients with broad alloantibody reactivity against potential kidney donors.