Differences in intravenous and subcutaneous application of recombinant human erythropoietin: a multicenter trial

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anaemia in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their use has been associated with cardiovascular events. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of ESAs (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, and biosimilar ESAs against each other, placebo, or no treatment) to treat anaemia in adults with CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 29 April 2022 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included a comparison of an ESA (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, a biosimilar epoetin or a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa) with another ESA, placebo or no treatment in adults with CKD were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors screened the search results and extracted data. Data synthesis was performed using random-effects pairwise meta-analysis (expressed as odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI)) and network meta-analysis. We assessed for heterogeneity and inconsistency within meta-analyses using standard techniques and planned subgroup and meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity or inconsistency. We assessed certainty in treatment estimates for the primary outcomes (preventing blood transfusions and death (any cause)) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-two new studies (9237 participants) were included in this update, so the review now includes 117 studies with 25,237 participants. Most studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in most methodological domains. Overall, results remain similar in this update compared to our previous review in 2014. For preventing blood transfusion, epoetin alfa (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.61; low certainty evidence) and epoetin beta (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47; low certainty evidence) may be superior to placebo, and darbepoetin alfa was probably superior to placebo (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.67; moderate certainty evidence). Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.02; very low certainty evidence), a biosimilar epoetin (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03; very low certainty evidence) and a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.91; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on preventing blood transfusion compared to placebo. The comparative effects of ESAs compared with another ESA on preventing blood transfusions were uncertain, in low to very low certainty evidence. Effects on death (any cause) were uncertain for epoetin alfa (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.22; low certainty evidence), epoetin beta (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.20; low certainty evidence), methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.71; very low certainty evidence), a biosimilar epoetin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.36; low certainty evidence) and a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.23; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo. There was probably no difference between darbepoetin alfa and placebo on the odds of death (any cause) (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; moderate certainty evidence). The comparative effects of ESAs compared with another ESA on death (any cause) were uncertain in low to very low certainty evidence. Epoetin beta probably increased the odds of hypertension when compared to placebo (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.00; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, epoetin alfa (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.59; very low certainty evidence), darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.14; low certainty evidence) and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.74; low certainty evidence) may increase the odds of hypertension, but a biosimilar epoetin (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.67; low certainty evidence) and biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 4.66; low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hypertension. The comparative effects of all ESAs compared with another ESA, placebo or no treatment on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular access thrombosis, kidney failure, and breathlessness were uncertain. Network analysis for fatigue was not possible due to sparse data.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effects of different ESAs on blood transfusions, death (any cause and cardiovascular), major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular access thrombosis, kidney failure, fatigue and breathlessness were uncertain.

Erythropoietin Administration for Anemia Due to Chronic Kidney Disease - Subcutaneous OR Intravenous, What Do We Know So Far?

The prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is almost twice that of the normal population and its severity increases exponentially as the disease worsens, dramatically affecting the quality of an individual’s life. The advent of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) in the 1980s saw a revolutionary change in the treatment of anemia in CKD patients, drastically improving quality of life (QoL), overall health and reducing the need for blood transfusions. Numerous ESAs have been developed ever since and are in current use, with the primary routes of administration being intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) injections. Their use, however, has stirred significant controversy over the last two decades. Additionally, despite numerous studies and trials, the latest international recommendations for their use do not provide clear cut guidance with well-grounded evidence on the recommended route of administration for different sets of patients. Instead, this decision has mainly been left up to the physician’s discretion, whilst keeping certain key factors in mind. This review shall summarize, discuss and compare the findings of previous studies on various factors governing the two aforementioned routes of administration and identify areas that need further exploration.

Administration of the same dose of epoetin-beta intravenously and subcutaneously to patients with renal anaemia

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of erythropoietin (EPO) is recommended over the intravenous (i.v.) route to reduce doses and costs. Optimal iron treatment is important for the optimal EPO effect. This study investigated whether the haemoglobin (Hb) level of a single patient could be preserved with the same dose of EPO given i.v. as given s.c.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One-hundred and forty-five haemodialysis patients with the same weekly EPO dose s.c. for 3 months and a stable Hb (maximum fluctuation of 1 mmol/l) were randomized in a crossover study to group A (4 months i.v. then 4 months s.c. EPO) or group B (4 months s.c. then 4 months i.v. EPO, with unchanged EPO dose). Ferritin had to be 300-800 μg/l or transferrin saturation ≥ 20%. Patients with a fall in Hb >1 mmol/l were withdrawn.

RESULTS

Ferritin and transferrin saturation remained within the target range, and mean Hb in the range of 1 mmol/l. Mean EPO doses were unchanged in both groups, and no difference was found between the dropouts due to Hb fall >1 mmol/l in the i.v. and s.c. groups during the first period of the trial.

CONCLUSION

In iron-replete haemodialysis patients the same EPO dose given intravenously is just as effective as given subcutaneously.

A comparison of haemoglobin levels and doses in haemodialysis patients treated with subcutaneous or intravenous darbepoetin alfa: a German prospective, randomized, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The different efficacy of subcutaneous and intravenous rHuEPO results in higher doses and costs in intravenously treated patients. Darbepoetin alfa has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared to rHuEPO, and previous clinical experience suggests that subcutaneous and intravenous darbepoetin alfa may have similar efficacy. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous and subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa regarding haemoglobin levels and doses.

METHODS

Patients treated with subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa for at least 6 months were randomized 1:1 to continue with subcutaneous treatment of darbepoetin alfa or to switch to the intravenous administration route. The application frequency was not altered. Darbepoetin alfa dose as well as haemoglobin concentrations were evaluated as per patient average at baseline (Week -3 +/- 1), Week 24 +/- 3 and Week 48 +/- 3.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients in 9 German dialysis centres were included. Fifty-three patients were treated intravenously and 61 patients continued the subcutaneous therapy. Mean haemoglobin levels and mean weekly darbepoetin alfa dose did not change significantly in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the darbepoetin alfa dose can be kept constant if patients are switched from subcutaneous to intravenous treatment.

Switching from subcutaneous to intravenous erythropoietin α in haemodialysis patients requires a major dose increase

BACKGROUND

A change in the licensing arrangements for the use of erythropoietin alpha in haemodialysis patients has required a switch in the route of administration from subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV). Previous work suggested that the IV route was less efficacious but studies since the enforced switch have not confirmed this.

METHODS

We studied haemoglobin levels and the mean weekly dose of erythropoietin alpha in 86 haemodialysis patients at monthly intervals over the 6 month period before and after a change in the route of administration of erythropoietin alpha from SC to IV. Changes in other parameters known to be associated with erythropoietin response were also monitored.

RESULTS

Mean haemoglobin level fell following the switch from 11.9 g/dl+/-1.4 at baseline to 11.3 g/dl+/-1.4 at 1 month (P = 0.001) and to a trough of 11.0 g/dl+/-1.3 at 2 months (P<0.001) before partial recovery to 11.4 g/dl+/-1.2 (P = 0.007) at 6 months. Mean weekly dose of erythropoietin after 2 months was significantly higher than baseline (8791 IU+/-5314 vs 8035 IU+/-4893). The dose continued to increase and by 6 months was 10605 IU (P<0.001), 32% higher than baseline. There was a small reduction in residual renal function, which was an independent predictor of change in dose requirement. There was a small increase in parathyroid hormone levels, but no change in serum ferritin, dosing frequency, total Kt/V, serum albumin, normalised protein catabolic rate, C-reactive protein, hospitalization rate and dialyser reuse rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from SC to IV erythropoietin alpha caused a significant fall in haemoglobin levels in the first 2 months. This was partially reversed by 6 months at the expense of a 32% dose increase in the dose of erythropoietin alpha by 6 months. The economic impact may be considerable.

Haemoglobin response to subcutaneous versus intravenous epoetin alfa administration in iron-replete haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Numerous prior studies have reported that a substantially higher dose of epoetin is required to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) concentration when patients are switched from a subcutaneous (s.c.) to intravenous (i.v.) route of administration. Many of the reported trials, however, involved patients who did not have adequate serum iron levels. It was hypothesized that patients with adequate iron stores who are switched from one route of administration to the other without a change in dose will experience substantially less change in their Hb concentration.

METHODS

Haemodialysis patients who were iron replete (ferritin 300-800 microg/L, transferrin saturation (TSAT) 25-50%) participated in a prospective, randomized cross-over trial receiving epoetin for 3 months either by s.c. or i.v. injection followed by a further 3 months of epoetin via the other route. The principal aim was to determine changes in Hb concentration without altering the weekly epoetin dose. The secondary aim was to assess whether the frequency of dosing (once, twice or thrice weekly) influenced the Hb concentration response.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (mean age 62 years, 60% male) entered the study and 15 withdrew prior to study completion. Forty-three patients began s.c. epoetin alfa administration (group A) and 38 on i.v. (group B). Median ferritin and TSAT at entry for groups A and B were 409 and 394 microg/L (NS) and 31 and 32% (NS), respectively, which remained within the target range during the study. Median epoetin doses for groups A and B were similar (90 vs 93 IU/kg per week, NS). After 3 months, the mean Hb concentration rose for group A (SC; 118.7-121.9 g/L (P = 0.03)) but it fell for group B (i.v.; 119.1-116.0 g/L (P = 0.019)). Following the change in route of administration, the Hb concentration for group A (i.v.) fell by 5.1% over 3 months (121.9-115.4, P < 0.001) and rose by 2.8% for group B (s.c.) over 3 months (116.0-119.7, P = 0.001). Similar significant changes in the Hb concentration were seen at different dosing frequencies.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous administration of epoetin produces a significant, although slight clinical change in Hb concentration compared with i.v. administration in stable, iron replete, haemodialysis patients. A similar effect appears to prevail regardless of the frequency of injections given.

Meta-analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous epoetin in maintenance treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies have shown that target hemoglobin or hematocrit levels can be maintained using a reduced recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) dosage by switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) administration.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of comparative studies of epoetin administered IV versus SC to assess the relative costs of these administration routes. Twenty-seven prospective clinical studies involving 916 patients were included in the analysis. The average difference between IV and SC doses of epoetin and average difference in drug costs between administration routes were determined.

RESULTS

The average reduction in dose in patients treated with SC versus IV epoetin was 48 IU/kg/wk (P < 0.001), representing an average annual cost savings with SC administration of US $1,761 +/- $1,080 (SD) per patient. The difference between SC and IV doses was similar in both parallel- and crossover-design studies. A retrospective US survey showed a dose reduction of 26 IU/kg/wk (P < 0.001) with SC administration, translating to an annual savings of $946 per patient.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the cost of epoetin is reduced substantially when administered SC in comparison to IV. Recommendations of current US and European guidelines, which encourage the use of SC administration, not only have a sound rationale in terms of efficacy and safety, but also have a sound economic basis.

Subcutaneous compared with intravenous epoetin in patients receiving hemodialysis. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Erythropoietin in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that if recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously, a lower dose may be sufficient to maintain the hematocrit at a given level.

METHODS

In a randomized, unblinded trial conducted at 24 hemodialysis units at Veterans Affairs medical centers, we assigned 208 patients who were receiving long-term hemodialysis and epoetin therapy to treatment with either subcutaneous or intravenous epoetin. The dose was initially reduced until the hematocrit was below 30 percent and then was gradually increased to a level that would maintain the hematocrit in the range of 30 to 33 percent for 26 weeks. We compared the average doses in the 26-week maintenance phase and the discomfort associated with the two routes of administration.

RESULTS

For the 107 patients treated by the subcutaneous route, the average weekly dose of epoetin during the maintenance phase was 32 percent less than that for the 101 patients treated by the intravenous route (mean [+/-SD], 95.1+/-75.0 vs. 140.3+/-88.5 U per kilogram of body weight per week; P<0.001). Only one patient in the subcutaneous-therapy group withdrew from the study because of pain at the injection site, and 86 percent rated the pain associated with subcutaneous administration as ranging from absent to mild.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving hemodialysis, subcutaneous administration of epoetin can maintain the hematocrit in a desired target range, with an average weekly dose of epoetin that is lower than with intravenous administration.